Rhode Island Public Sector Unions Form New Coalition

Rhode Island Retirement Security Coalition Website
www.RhodeIslandRetirementSecurity.org

Rhode Island Public Sector Unions Form New Coalition

Group to Study and Advocate for Public Employees in Pension Change Debate

Providence, RI — A new coalition of public sector unions was announced today to advocate for public employees in the ongoing pension change debate. The Rhode Island Retirement Security Coalition was created to educate and inform the members of the coalition’s unions on the potential changes to the state retirement system that are being discussed this summer at General Treasurer Gina Raimondo’s Pension Advisory Commission and this fall in a special session of the General Assembly.

The Rhode Island Retirement Security Coalition is composed of: the Rhode Island AFL-CIO, AFSCME Council 94, the Rhode Island Federation of Teachers and Health Professionals, the National Education Association Rhode Island, the Service Employees International Union- Locals 580 and 401, the Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional Officers, the International Brotherhood of Police Officers- NAGE/SEIU, the Laborers International Union of North America, and the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers- Local 400.

“With so much information coming out almost daily many of the rank-and-file members are understandably confused and scared about what is going on with their pensions, which they have faithfully paid into week after week and year after year,” said coalition spokesperson George Nee, President of the Rhode Island AFL-CIO. “The Rhode Island Retirement Security Coalition was put together so the unions could provide timely and relevant information to their members and the public.”

In an effort to reach their members quickly, the Rhode Island Retirement Security Coalition launched a website (www.RhodeIslandRetirementSecurity.org) today that allows union members and the public to access information, news stories, reports, and give their input into the discussion on the pension situation in Rhode Island.

New National Report Highlights RI Public Defender

Back in February I posted about the fact that underfunded Public Defenders are a smokescreen for the real issue: underfunded prosecutors and courts cannot handle the number of crimes coming at them.  A new report by Justice Policy Institute, System Overload: The Costs of Under-Resourcing Public Defense, continues the one-sided argument- although making some excellent points.

The latest report (continuing the BJS findings, as did I) notes the costs to “people” and “taxpayers” through pre-trial detention, and how hasty defense increases wrongful convictions.  Yet it does not point out who benefits.  Any analysis should be a “Cost-Benefit Analysis,” and factor into account those beneficiaries who care neither about people nor taxpayers.  They care about their own bottom line, and their own power.

Those who enjoy and utilize statistics will find a wealth in the new JPI report, such as: 64% of wrongful rape convictions, exonerated from DNA evidence, are Black, although only 12% of America is Black.  I love numbers, but a popular Movement will not be based on numbers.  Simple facts, simple understandings, and a simple view of what the criminal justice system is actually doing will cause the creature to crumble.

Rhode Island and others (including Bronx Defenders and in D.C.) are lauded for taking the entire person into account, including pre-trial and post-release issues that arise from criminal justice contact.

Other than the obvious recommendation, to implement standards of representation as outlined by the American Bar Association, the report recommends two other vital pieces:

  1. Public Defenders should engage in the policy debate.  It is shameful that in a country where so many vital services are conducted through the state, those workers are generally forbidden to speak up or are living in fear for their jobs.  This is a waste of insight and experience, provided they are capable of speaking openly.
  2. Seek input from those who have been served by the Public Defender.  To move our society in any productive way on criminal justice, the “Client” relationship must be seen as a “partnership.”  Are we all in this together?  Or are the poor communities being controlled by an upper-class colonial mentality?  I have gotten more requests from my internet provider to see how they are doing than I have had from anyone in the criminal justice sphere over the past two decades.

This report still fails to pay even a passing reference to the problem of underfunded prosecutors.  I don’t believe it is intentional, it is the product of an arms race.  Funding must keep up with the other side, rather than funding must be reduced to the other side.  In a down economy, nobody will accept sweeping increases for prosecutions… but nor will we see any massive increases to Public Defense.

By making the issue about public defense, one can argue about “coddling criminals” or “can we really afford this?”  But if the argument were about whether the Attorney General and Courts should be 50% of the budget… what then?

My RIPTA conversation with Gordon Fox


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Yesterday I wrote to Gordon Fox, asking him to help defend, not defund RIPTA. This is what I wrote:

I am writing to you because now is not the time to cut funds to RIPTA, now is the time to increase them. I know this sounds counter-intuitive, but a functioning public transportation system is a strength for the community. Portland Oregon has a strong system, and they are better for it.

Please work on behalf of your constituents and all of RI to strengthen, rather than to weaken RIPTA.

This is perhaps the fourth or fifth email I have sent Gordon Fox. For the first time, he answered me:

Thank you very much for writing to me in support of an amendment to the state budget offered by Representative Jay O’Grady regarding funding at DOT and RIPTA.  Although I could not support the amendment this year due to the severe budget constraints, I have pledged to work with Reps. O’Grady, Arthur Handy and Teresa Tanzi in the future to continue our efforts to improve our state’s transportation system.

Meanwhile, I was proud to support Article 22 of the budget, which has now been signed into law, which creates a transportation trust fund and provides that incremental increases of transportation-related surcharges will be dedicated to the fund.  It will also reduce DOT’s reliance on borrowing and transition us to a pay-as-you-go system.

I appreciate your sentiments, and I thank you again for taking the time to write about this important issue.

The response was of course unsatisfactory, and indicative of the kind of politician Gordon Fox is. It is unsatisfactory because it does nothing to answer Fox’s complicity in the cuts RIPTA is planning. The loss of revenues to RI businesses and families will be devastating to our already fragile economy. It is indicative of the way Gordon Fox oprates because he does not take a stand on an issue, he simply pledges to “work with” those who have decided to.

Fox’s support for Article 22 of the budget is a rather silly statement. he voted for the budget, so he tacitly supported all the provisions therein. In owning the one small part of the budget that will give some of the funds from the Registry of Motor Vehicles to the DOT and RIPTA, he hopes to artificially inflate his support in the public’s eyes.

There’s a curious thing about Article 22. Under it, 20% of the monies collected in 2012 by the Registry of Motor Vehicles will go towards the “Intermodal Surface Transportation Fund” and this figure will increase each year by 20% until all collected monies are so directed. Fair enough. But this year we also passed the Voter ID bill, so we can expect that, under the increased onus of free IDs, revenues from the Registry will go down. After all, free means more people, longer lines, and less monies collected.

Top Ten Reasons Wyatt Prison is an Epic Scandal


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

With the recent bankruptcy filing by Central Falls, RI, many are asking what will happen to the city’s most notorious flagship, the Wyatt Detention Facility.  The city will not disappear, no more than Bridgeport, CT disappeared along route 95 ten years ago.  Bridgeport is roughly the size of Providence, is Connecticut’s largest city, and some feared their bankruptcy in 1991 would drag the entire state into collapse.  Central Falls is Rhode Island’s smallest city, and apparently home to large scale corruption.  Here are the Top10 Reasons the privately owned, municipally managed, prison is a fitting ground zero to understand the situation.

10:  The Interest Payments- The Wyatt financial fiasco is a case study in collecting interest, as they have long since been underwater on their loans.  The Central Falls Detention Facility Corporation refinanced their loan (bonds owned by investors) so they could build an addition, and have $229 million in liabilities at the start of 2011, while their prison was independently assessed at $45 million.  With the “homeowners” barely able to make their payments now, they will surely face a “loan modification” in a very short period of time.  I wonder if anyone is willing to take over the payments?  I wonder if anyone is dumb enough to take over the prison and pay five times as much in annual interest than principal?

9:  Brown University- John Birkelund, as CEO of Dillon Read, sold the Wyatt prison bonds to John Birkelund, as Chairman of Brown’s endowment; making a profit (surely) for John Birkelund and friends.  Ever heard the phrase “Pump & Dump?”

8:  AVCORR- Anthony Ventetuolo was a founding father of the Wyatt prison, and former blue-blood of the ACI.  He learned that moving from public to private services, one can literally make millions of dollars for the same work.  AVCORR ultimately took over management of the prison, and recent financial audits have expressed serious issues with the financial controls.  He has been dismissed; and in a state where everyone is connected, an in depth state investigation by Lynch or Kilmartin is inconceivable.

7:  RDW-  Mike Doyle, a top lobbyist in Rhode Island is another founding father, greasing the wheels for a prison to legally become a for-profit enterprise and ensuring a base of lobbying efforts to create more prisoners, more crime, and more clientele.  With an office 100 yards from the statehouse, some would say it’s a nice fit.

6:  Federal Lobbying- After paying $10,000 a month to Dutko Worldwide to do D.C. lobbying, Wyatt still couldn’t keep the ICE contract after this shoestring operation (where all money has to pay off bond interest) could not keep Jason Ng alive.  One has to appreciate there is a billion dollar industry that needs to encourage incarceration through lobbying efforts.  And here you thought people only went to prison because of their own behavior.  Meanwhile, AIG holds the bond agreement, and Halliburton was the construction company; companies who merely pay fines when caught stealing.

5:  Fiscal Impact Statement- Is $50,000 a month lots of money?  $10,000?  Depends.  The Wyatt is not only Tax Free, but it also gets free water and garbage from the City, and who knows what else.  What is the water bill for 1000 people?  What is the trash bill for Providence’s four largest hotels?  Without a Fiscal Impact Statement, the hoped for, yet denied (“Suckers”) charity that Wyatt dangles may not even make up for the charity they receive from CF and the people of Rhode Island.

4:  Mayor Moreau- This is the guy who was getting $10k contracts for friends to board up foreclosed houses.  He appointed every member of the CFDFC Board (who are charged with managing the money).  If anyone has “Federal Investigation” written all over them, it would be Mayor Moreau- who is known as a long-time friend of Patrick Lynch.  Of course, if the Bush and Obama administrations would ever take some of their White Collar investigators back from the “War on Terror,” and put them back to the “War on White Collar Crime”…

3:  Judges Pfeifer and Flanders- Connected as they come in RI (long time judiciary) and respected enough to be appointed receivers of Central Falls.  Although CFDFC, the municipal corporation created to manage Wyatt, is a “distinct legal entity” from the city, these judges fail to point this out.  Instead they allow the success or failure of this business to be seen as tied to the city, and the state.

2:  Former A.G. Patrick Lynch is more embedded in Wyatt than just a friendship with Moreau.  Of all the attorneys in RI to be Wyatt’s chief legal counsel, Lynch’s sister got the job when he was the Attorney General.  What are the connections between current A.G. Kilmartin (also from Pawtucket) and the Wyatt?  Perhaps that is an easy question for some.

1:  Congressman Cicillini a rival to Mayor Moreau on leaving a city in shambles, and now that Wyatt represents “jobs” in his congressional district…  We shall see how much he supports tax dollars being diverted to private investors’ financial scandal.  Is there a protection of taxpayer funds?  Is there a concern for human rights?  For civil rights?  Any concern for the families and communities being used to finance this business deal?

The For-Profit privately owned Wyatt prison is not the Alamo.  It is not Bunker Hill, nor Ground Zero.  Its just a bad business deal- and investors know that it doesn’t always work out.  Ciao.