Whitehouse Intros Super PAC DISCLOSE Bill


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

RI Future first reported this story Monday morning, but we thought you might want to know that it has now actually happened. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse introduced the DISCLOSE Act, which would require Super PACs and other anonymous political donors to stand by their TV ads by requiring that they put their names on them.

“The American people deserve to know who is really behind these ads,” said Whitehouse, according to a press release from his office.  “This legislation will require organizations involved in elections to tell the public where they are getting their money, and what they are spending it on – shining a badly needed light into the activities of these groups.”

Here are more quotes from some of Whitehouse’s 34 co-sponsoring senators:

“In the age of super PACs, it is more important than ever for citizens to understand who is financing political campaigns and negative attack ads. Voters must be able to make informed decisions, and this legislation provides rules that will prevent this unregulated influx of money from compromising the transparency of our electoral process.”
– Senator Jeanne Shaheen, D-New Hampshire

“Republicans and Democrats have both touted disclosure in the past and the ideas in this bill have earned broad support. There’s a lot we need to fix with campaign finance, but at a minimum, the American people at least deserve to know where the deluge of money financing these new shadow campaign operations is coming from.”
– Senator Tom Udall, D-New Mexico

“Citizens United unleashed a wave of corporate campaign cash that threatens to drown out the voice of the people.  This is a serious threat to our democracy and we cannot stand by while it happens.”
– Senator Jeff Merkley, D-Oregon

“We believe that all of the unlimited cash allowed by the Citizens United decision must at least be disclosed.”  “This legislation seeks to limit the damage of the Supreme Court decision that has given corporations and the very wealthy unprecedented sway over our elections, and represents one of the most serious threats to the future of our democracy.”
– Senator Charles E. Schumer, D-New York

Video: Why Flat Tax Hasn’t Worked For Rhode Island


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Rhode Islanders for Tax Equity release a powerful new video today that explains why un-flattening the income tax code and increasing the rate that the richest residents pay would help to solve many of the issues that are currently plaguing the state.

The group, made up of many unions and economic activist groups from around the state, is pushing for passage of the Cimini-Mill bill which would increase income taxes for those who make more than $250,000 a year.

You’ll notice the video says the tax rate was lowered in 2006. And if you’re a regular reader of RI Future, you’ll remember that House speaker Gordon Fox told me recently he wouldn’t consider this bill this session because it is the first year that the new tax rate was in place. In actuality, the tax rate has been getting flatter since 2007 and this is the first year it is completely flat at the top.

Here’s a chart showing unemployment going up as the top tax rate goes down:

RITE has an interesting slogan on its website: “Rebuild RI the RITE Way.” Not too far off from the Projo’s new series of the state of the state’s economy, “Reinvent RI.” Interestingly, both efforts are designed to help Rhode Island get out of the economic mess it is in.

George Nee, president of the AFLO-CIO and a member of the group, added in a press release that such a move would be a boon for Rhode Island’s struggling economy:

“Only the top 2% of income earners in Rhode Island will be affected by this bill. Our hope is that the other 98% will benefit through this increased revenue, which could be used to lower property taxes, help small business owners create jobs, stop college tuition increases, restore funding to programs for the neediest Rhode Islanders, and fix our roads and bridges. This is a bottom up campaign. We are hoping this video helps educate and motivate lower and middle-income Rhode Islanders and helps create a groundswell of support for this bill.”

 

Homeless and Advocates Fight for Help at Senate Hearing


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
The ACI
Sen. John J. Tassoni, Jr.
Sen. John J. Tassoni, Jr., Chair of the Senate Housing and Municipal Government Committee (via Smithfield Democrats)

The State Senators of the Committee on Housing and Municipal Government met to hear testimony from homeless people and their advocates about the state’s emergency winter shelter and the move of the men’s shelter currently situated at Harrington Hall to the Gloria MacDonald building at the ACI.

Homeless people, advocates, service providers, and their supporters packed the room, with a number of people remaining standing throughout the roughly hour and a half long meeting where it was made clear that the state cannot continue on its present path.

With 88 beds, Harrington Hall is unable to meet demand and is often over capacity. Men looking to reserve a bed can do so if they agree to follow conditions laid out in a contract, about 40 have done so; another contract allows use of the 30 lockers available, all of which are currently reserved. Four showers are available.

When asked about the state of the bathrooms, which serve far more than 88 men each day, Sean Trott, a shift supervisor, said they are horrendous, but by shelter standards “we’re considered clean.” Trott described some shelter residents starting their days at 3:00 am to avoid waiting for the bathroom; “they are the hardest workers I know,” he said. When he ended his testimony, Trott received an ovation from the crowd for his full description of the conditions. Sen. John Tassoni, a Lincoln Democrat, said, “I wouldn’t even let my dog stay in that shelter.”

Sen. Tassoni and Sen. DeVall both spoke about being appalled by the conditions of Harrington Hall. Sen. DeVall expressed frustration that a year after viewing the shelter, conditions hadn’t improved and a solution had not yet been found. “The leadership needs to go over there and see what it’s like,” said Sen. Tassoni.

The senators also expressed surprise when a worker at Emmanuel House said that the shelter run by Crossroads Rhode Island on Broad St. in Providence maintained a policy of keeping half its beds empty, a revelation which was met by murmurs of knowing displeasure from the viewing crowd. The senators agreed to call a representative of Crossroads Rhode Island to the next meeting.

John Freitas, a member of the Rhode Island Homeless Advocacy Project (RIHAP) who is himself homeless said that shelter was not the solution, “housing is the solution.” Mr. Freitas stepped away from the podium without fielding a question from the senators. Indeed, not a single currently homeless or recently homeless person who gave testimony was questioned by any of the senators. The senators were more willing to engage with advocates, whom they often asked pointed questions to.

Early on, Sen. Hanna Gallo (D – Cranston) entered the meeting and was invited to ask questions. Most pressing to the senator from Cranston were five sex offenders who currently reside at Harrington Hall. Citing walking distance to a library and a baseball field, Sen. Gallo opposed moving the shelter to the new location. Sen. Gallo received support from Sen. Pinga and Sen. Maher. Jean Johnson, Executive Director of the House of Hope, responded by noting that House of Hope registers the sex offenders as residing there. If any fail to return at night, the police are notified. Thus, the location of said offenders is known and watched from 7 pm at night to 5 am in the morning. No such protection exists for sex offenders not registered with the shelter. Sen. Tassoni said that this was the result of a few residents in Cranston getting their neighbors worked up over nothing, noting that 82 sex offenders currently reside in Cranston.

Sen. Crowley asked Ms. Johnson what happens to a typical resident in the morning. “They get on a bus and go to where we know people usually congregate, such as Providence,” replied Ms. Johnson.

“What’s to stop them from getting off at Pine St.?” said Sen. Crowley.

The ACI
The ACI in Cranston

“Nothing,” said Ms. Johnson. She went on to note that in House of Hope’s time running Harrington Hall, sixteen sex offenders had found housing, while seven were returned to prison. However, only the one of those was due an incident of recidivism; the others were due to parole violations.

Jim Ryczek, Executive Director of the Rhode Island Coalition for the Homeless, gave testimony to the committee where he said that many of the issues with the sex offenders were problems that the House of Hope had taken on upon themselves, providing a service to the state that the Department of Corrections would otherwise have to fill. Sen. Maher acknowledged that the senators were aware of this lack in the Department of Corrections. Sen. Pinga also expressed a desire to separate the five sex offenders from the rest of the residents at Harrington Hall. Neither senator offered suggestions for how such a thing might be done. Mr. Ryczek, a resident of Cranston and father of two young children, noted the jarring experience of receiving a sex offender notice in the mail, but asked the senators to look beyond that to dealing with people who need assistance.

Sen. Pinga did note that all towns and cities in Rhode Island are required to have 10% of their housing stock be affordable housing, which would help in alleviating homelessness. Sen. Tassoni pointed said that only 40% to 50% of municipalities had so far met that goal.

John Joyce, co-director of RIHAP, delivered some of the last testimony. “It seems like year after year the conversation about homelessness ends when the winter shelters end,” said Mr. Joyce. He said that the state’s commitment to the homeless doesn’t end, and pointed out that Dr. Eric Hirsch, a Professor of Sociology at Providence College, had calculated it cost the state $8,000 more to keep someone in a shelter than in permanent supportive housing with wraparound services (Dr. Hirsch also gave testimony earlier in the meeting). “We can end homelessness in Rhode Island,” said Mr. Joyce.

Committee Considers Legalized Marijuana


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Marijuana would be legal, and available at designated stores, if a bill being heard at the State House tonight were to become law.

“It would be a brave new world,” said Rep. Edith Ajello, a Providence Democrat who is sponsoring the legislation. “It would be taxed. There would be stores that sold marijuana, legally licensed by the state just as stores are licensed to sell alcohol.”

Ajello, it should be noted, doesn’t think that brave new world will come to fruition this session. Not only does she not think her bill would pass this year, she doesn’t think the federal government would allow the change.

But a related bill, which would decriminalize marijuana, might. This bill, she said, has healthy support in both chambers and is similar to the law in Massachusetts and Connecticut.

That decriminalize bill, sponsored by Rep. John Edwards, D- Tiverton, Portsmouth, would lessen the punishment for possession of less than an ounce of pot a ticket and a $150 fine. Oh yeah, and “forfeiture of the marijuana,” according to the bill that will also be heard tomorrow night.

Law enforcement is expected to oppose the legislation.

Maine, Massachusetts, Connecticut and New York have all decriminalized possession of small amounts of pot. In total, 13 states have such reduced penalties for possession.

Ajello said she expects marijuana will be legal in the near future once more people realize how harmless it is.

I do think it is where we will be,” she said. “Marijuana is not thought to be any more dangerous than alcohol and we have legalized and taxed alcohol. I think ultimately we can move through decriminalization to legalizing and taxing.”