Remember the Battle of the Gravestones in Saylesville


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

In 1934, during the height of the Depression and one of the largest national strikes in history, 4 unarmed Rhode Island workers were killed by State Police and Militia Men called out by Governor TF Green to protect the Saylesville Bleachery in Lincoln, Rhode Island. It wasn’t a “strike,” he declared, but a “communist insurrection.”

Militia attacking striking workers from behind gravestones in Saylesville, Rhode Island.

Whatever. Four workers were cut down in the street. You can still see the bullet holes in the gravestones from the high powered guns used against the strikers and each labor day some of us gather to remind the powers that be that we are not all dead and buried. This year Maureen Martin, Secretary-Treasurer of the Rhode Island AFL-CIO will deliver the address at the memorial to the martyrs created by the Rhode Island Labor History Society to memorialize what is known as The Battle of the Gravestones.

The monument is located in Moshassuck Cemetery, 978 Lonsdale Avenue in Central Falls.

All are invited to a ceremony honoring the event and those who lost their lives.

You can register for the event on Facebook.

If you like, you can see actual newsreel video of the street battle here.

CIVIL WAR AT SAYLESVILLE

 

Don Carcieri’s 38 Studios Silence: Selfish and Foolish


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

It turns out even Republicans are miffed at Don Carcieri for hiding from the media when one of his signature decisions as governor blew up in the face of Rhode Island.

“Former Gov. Donald L. Carcieri’s long silence on the 38 Studios bankruptcy wound up putting fellow Rhode Island Republicans on the spot this week at Mitt Romney’s nominating convention,” wrote correspondent John Mulligan in today’s ProJo. “Carcieri, the delegation’s most prominent exponent of running a government according to sound business principles, declined to be interviewed Wednesday about his role in a state-backed loan guarantee for former Boston Red Sox star Curt Schilling’s company. The failed deal may leave Rhode Island voters on the hook for up to $102 million.”

That Carcieri broke his long silence on the 38 Studios debacle once it “wound up putting fellow Rhode Island Republicans on the spot” speaks to our post on Carcieri from Thursday in which we wrote: “Carcieri always represented conservatives first and then Rhode Islanders somewhere after that.”

Carcieri broke his silence on 38 Studios not when Rhode Island was most desperate for answers about it, but when Republicans were most desperate for cover.

Apparently that cover didn’t come quick enough.

Because Carcieri thought he could dodge the issue indefinitely, it ended up becoming a story when other Republicans had to answer for him. So not only was Carcieri’s tack on 38 Studios selfish, it was foolish too.

Here’s what some prominent Republicans told Mulligan about how Carcieri handled the situation:

“I would probably have spoken about my role” in such a loss of taxpayer dollars and Rhode Island jobs, said John Robitaille, Carcieri’s former communications chief.

“A lot of people are wondering” what went into Carcieri’s “business judgment” that the 38 Studios venture was a good investment of Rhode Island tax dollars, [Cranston Mayor Allan Fung] said.

Rhode Island’s incoming GOP national committeeman, Steven Frias, said Carcieri’s support of Schilling’s video venture will dog the state’s Republicans for a long time…

 

Occupy Providence Returns


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Artemis Moonhawk, left, and two other occupy Providence activists re-attach their banner to the statue of General Burnside. (submitted)

Occupy Providence is back in Burnside Park. But there are a couple of things different about this incarnation of the local 99 Percent movement.

One difference is they aren’t camping this time around. Not yet, anyways. But they have been meeting daily in what activists call the People’s Park for a little over a week now.

And for another, they aren’t getting along as well with Providence police as they did the first time around.

“A police officer shoved me,” said Artemis Moonhawk, who was a strong presence with the first incarnation of Occupy Providence and who has been organizing events and meet-ups throughout the winter, spring and summer in anticipation of the second one.

She said seven activists met in the park Thursday and attached the iconic Occupy Providence banner to a fence. Officers asked them to take it down saying there is a new rule banning signs in Burnside Park. Instead they attached it to some chairs and another officer came by and was a little more aggressive with his request. Moonhawk said he was angry the banner was still up and that she was shoved when she got up to remove it.

“This is the first time we have ever had any problems with the Providence police,” she said. “This opened up a big can of worms.”

Police confiscated the banner, she said. But activists plan to get it back from police tomorrow. They’ve organized a march from Burnside Park to the police station to retrieve it. Police said they could have it back.

There will also be a sidewalk occupation in front of the former home of 38 Studios starting at 2 p.m. on Saturday. Activists plan to meet at Burnside and march to the office building on Empire Street. On Monday, there is a vigil in Roger Williams Memorial Park on South Main Street from noon to 6 p.m. and again on Tuesday from noon to 5.

Across the nation, Occupy groups have been rekindling their protest against corporate greed and income inequality. On September 17, Occupy Wall Street plans a large, sit-in in front of the New York Stock Exchange on the one-year anniversary of the first night of camping in Zuccotti Park.

EG Church Kicks Out Cub Scouts For Discrimination


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
St. Luke’s Church in downtown East Greenwich. (Photo courtesy of EG Patch)

An Episcopal church in East Greenwich told a local Cub Scout group it can’t use its facilities to meet because it doesn’t agree with the Boy Scouts of America decision to discriminate against gay people, according to East Greenwich Patch.

Tim Rich, the priest at St. Luke’s Episcopal Church, told EG Patch that the decision to not let local Cub Scouts to use its facilities to meet was a “unanimous conclusion.”

He said, “From the lens of faith, which is how I view things, it rejects that certain of God’s children are unworthy to be included. It’s quite the modern-day representation of everything I think Jesus fought against. So, from a faith standpoint I just really reject their decision.”

Rich is new to the church in June. The congregation is somewhat liberal, but has many conservative members as well. It will be interesting to see how the “unanimous” decision will play with parishioners and with East Greenwich residents, who aren’t known for their commitment to social justice.

The Episcopal Church is the largest denomination in the United States to sanction same sex relationships, though it has a tiered system not unlike Rhode Island’s marriage for heterosexual couples and civil unions for same sex couples. In the Episcopal Church same sex marriages are called: “The Witnessing and Blessing of a Lifelong Covenant,” according to NPR and the AP.

Gov. Chafee To Address Democratic Convention


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Governor Chafee addressing a much smaller crowd at Bryant University earlier this year. (photo by Bob Plain)

Governor Lincoln Chafee, a reformed Republican-turned-independent, will be a speaker at this year’s Democratic Nation Convention. He’s scheduled to address the Democrats Tuesday night in prime time, the opening night of the convention. He’ll preceeed First Lady Michelle Obama.

“I am honored to be attending the 2012 Democratic National Convention,” Chafee said in an prepared statement. “President Obama has been a friend to Rhode Island, his policies have brought valuable benefits to the people of our state during historically difficult times, and I am proud to explain to the convention audience why I – a former Republican – and lots of people like me are supporting the President’s re-election.”

Chafee has been friendly with President Obama since the two served in the U.S. Senate together. While Obama didn’t endorse Chafee for governor, he also didn’t endorse Democrat Frank Caprio. Caprio then told Obama to “shove it,” on talk radio – a campaign blunder that ultimately helped Chafee prevail in the three-way race.

Christian Vereika, a spokesman for the governor, said Chafee is speaking to support the president, but not necessarily the Democratic party. He said Chafee’s speech or his attendance at the convention, does not mean the governor is considering joining the Democratic party.

“Difficult as it is, I think he is happy where he is,” Vereika said.

WPRI reports Chafee was invited about three weeks ago and has been crafting a seven-minute speech in the meantime.

Inviting Chafee to speak seems to be part of Democrats agenda to appeal to moderates and undecided voters. Florida Republican Charlie Christ will also speak at the DNC.

Perhaps most interesting about the announcement is that you won’t find it it’s very hard to find in today’s Providence Journal. Local reporters were sent an embargoed press release about the news at 6:11 Thursday afternoon. I’m assuming Journal reporters got a copy of the email, but have not confirmed that yet.

Similarly, when Chafee traveled to Afghanistan earlier this year, the news did not make the front page of the newspaper so maybe the ProJo just doesn’t like when Chafee leaves the state. Oh wait, but they did report pretty extensively on when he went on vacation, so maybe it’s something else…

Overzealous Security Guard at Hinckley Fundraiser


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Raging Grannies protest outside a Barry Hinckley fundraiser at the Ocean House in Westerly (Photo by Danielle Dirocco)

While Barry Hinckley was inside the Ocean House wining and dining with Steve Forbes, the only man richer than Mitt Romney to run for president since Ross Perot, I was being verbally accosted outside by a security detail while the Raging Grannies sang a catchy tune.

I had shown up at the Ocean House, a posh establishment in the Watch Hill area of Westerly, to take some pictures of the Raging Grannies, who were protesting Barry Hinckley’s fundraiser. Hinckley’s exceptionally wealthy guests happened to include multi-millionaire and two-time failed Republican Presidential candidate Steve Forbes.

I had been asked if I would go down there and make sure the Grannies got some great pictures and video. A chance to be supportive of little old ladies singing protest songs about the 99% in front of one of the wealthiest individuals in the country? I thought, “Count me in!” and headed down there for what was sure to be an enjoyable time.

After taking some pictures and a little video, I decided to wander a little bit. Normally, this wouldn’t be a reason to be alarmed, but it turned out that I had unwittingly wandered onto private property– specifically, I walked into the parking lot across the street from Ocean House. Faster than you can say “DON’T TAZE ME, BRO!” I had two individuals– a man and a woman– charging toward me, demanding to know what I was doing there. I initially greeted them with a smile and a hello, not realizing they were coming at me aggressively. The woman got up in my face, yelling that she had “already told me” that I wasn’t allowed to be there.

I had never met this woman before in my life, so my gut reaction was to explain myself- I didn’t know I wasn’t supposed to be there, I hadn’t been told this prior to that point. She went on, threatening me, shouting that I was on private property, roaring for me to “GET OUT NOW.”

I was entirely baffled, stunned into feeling like I had to tell this woman that I was innocent, that I meant no harm, that I was just meandering. She mocked me, chiding that I wasn’t exiting the premises fast enough, demanding I get out. Was I supposed to leave entirely? Could I go back to where I was before she had decided I was some kind of horrible person, or was I being commanded to leave the entire area? Was I about to be manhandled? Arrested? I gave up trying to explain, let out a confused sound, and walked back to where the grannies were serenading the privileged American aristocracy from afar.

I’m not exactly sure what I did to provoke so much anger from this woman, but a simple “Excuse me, ma’am, you aren’t supposed to be here” would have been more than enough to elicit an apology for being in  the wrong place and my immediate compliance with her rational request that I leave the area. The immediate and overwhelming aggressive posturing displayed toward an innocent citizen was more reminiscent of the modus operandi of the TSA than that of a security detail for a political candidate and his wealthy friends. And we all know how much you hate the TSA, Mr. Hinckley.

I would imagine the explanation for this person’s aggression would be that I was asking for it, that I should have known better, and that I should have immediately complied with her demands, but the truth is that I had no idea what those demands were at the time– I was too overwhelmed with her irrational behavior to understand the situation. Upon reflection, I am quite sure that if this woman had been an armed police officer, I would’ve been tazed (or worse) before I would’ve had a damn clue what she was asking of me.

What rational discourse can be had when dealing with those primarily concerned with protecting their own wealth and privilege rather than being concerned with treating the rest of us as human beings who deserve as much respect as the mighty “job creators”?

For me, I’ll stick with cheering for the Raging Grannies. I’d rather be old, gray and raging than coddling Hinckley’s aristocratic friends any day.

Will Gemma Denounce Slurs by Top Adviser?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Charles Drago

As I’ve previously reported, the Gemma campaign has for months been plagued by desperate stunts. But the most troubling pattern that has surfaced is what a former Gemma staffer describes as pervasive homophobia.

Charles Drago has been a key Gemma adviser and vocal surrogate since 2010 and has received $10,500 from the Gemma campaign. Recently, the Gemma campaign rightfully denounced a disgusting tweet by staffer Anthony Sionni.

Later that evening, I posted a couple of homophobic slurs made by Charles Drago directed at David Cicilline in 2009. Below are a couple more slurs made by Drago around the same time. If this kind of bile is coming from one of the campaign’s top advisers, then I can only imagine what kind of conversations are taking place at the water cooler. Kind of makes you cringe.

In the first example, Drago refers to Providence Councilman Terry Hassett as someone who has an “ankle-gripping obseisance” to Cicilline. In the next example, Drago says the term teabagging is in reference to a date between Cicilline and radio host John DePetro. Drago clearly has no shame nor decency.

Will the Gemma campaign denounce these horrible homophobic slurs?


=
=====================================================

Carcieri Always Represented Conservatives, Not RI


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

It should come as no surprise to see former Governor Don Carcieri, the architect of the 38 Studios fiasco, yucking it up at the Republican Convention even though he has yet to answer questions about his role in state’s biggest economic blunder in a generation.

After all, Carcieri always represented conservatives first and then Rhode Islanders somewhere after that. We’re talking about a governor who gave more interviews to WPRO shock jocks than the rest of the local media combined!

But, like Scott MacKay of RIPR, we were surprised that Carcieri had the gall to be offering an economics lecture to President Obama. Here’s how MacKay put it:

Well, governor, what say you about a purported conservative Republican  Rhode Island governor who gambled with the taxpayers money, made the most reckless  crony capitalism economic development loan in the state’s history (38Studios, which is now bankrupt) and left the taxpayers hanging for $100 million in loan guarantees. Then this very same governor leaves office, goes into virtual hiding, refuses to answer to anybody to justify his actions and finally turns up in Tampa at the Republican National Convention to lecture the president on business.

The reality is many of Rhode Island’s economic sore spots are Carcieri’s fault. 38 Studios is only the most obvious example. Another is the state’s epidemic of failing cities. When Carcieri cut off state aid to the state’s poorest communities he virtually guaranteed at least some of them would have no other option than to go through an expensive reorganization.

As governor, he also focused his energies on cutting the state payroll instead of growing the state economy. And he fought really hard against obvious economic development winners like a casino and a port at Quonset.

One missed opportunity that few people recall is when Carcieri had the old Jamestown Bridge demolished instead of turning it into what would have been one of the most beautiful – and probably well-visited – bike paths in the world. Environmentalists and transportation advocates fought hard for the idea at the time, though the local media largely ignored the idea. Imagine how many additional people who visit and vacation in the Ocean State if they could ride their bikes from the South County beaches, through scenic Saunderstown over Narragansett Bay and right out to Beavertail and Fort Wetherill.

It’s well worth noting that Carcieri had a beach house in Saunderstown  – it’s his legal address these days, though we get the feeling he spends more time at his place in Florida than in Rhode Island – and many of the uber-affluent residents on both sides of the bridge deplored the idea of sharing their slice of Rhode Island with the masses.

The best thing Carcieri probably did for Rhode Island is give us proof positive that business acumen doesn’t translate to political acumen.

And now here is campaigning for a businessman for president.

That should be all the evidence Rhode Island and the nation needs to know that Mitt Romney is the wrong guy to be president. After all, Carcieri has proven no more effective at picking winners in politics than he has in the video game business.

A Strong New Voice for Providence’s East Side


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Gayle Goldin, A Strong New Voice for State Senate – District 3

On July 2nd, I joined a large crowd as Governor Chafee opened birth records for a group of people who have never been allowed to see them: people who were adopted in Rhode Island. It was an extraordinary moment for the people who had fought to have access to a little bit of information we all take for granted – their names at birth, who gave birth to them, at what time, and where.

I know many lives were changed that day. I could see it on all of their faces. And that moment made the years of work we put into it all worthwhile. I am honored to be one of the many people who worked to change that law, to create equal rights for those who are adopted in our state.

I am running for State Senator because, like that day in July, I know that our legislators’ decisions have a direct impact on the lives of all of us.

I have spent my whole career in Rhode Island working on public policies that impact our right to health care, equality, economic opportunity, and that protect some of our most vulnerable populations.

I believe strongly that good public policy – based on a thorough analysis of the facts, coupled with compassion and a dedication to progressive values -can bring about real, positive change in our state. Through the breadth and diversity of my work, I have seen the many places where policy areas intersect. We need legislators at the General Assembly who see these intersections, understand how to make decision based on fact not anecdotes, and that advocate to protect all of our rights.

I am lucky to live on the East Side. Our neighborhood is filled with people who care about each other, care about our state, and care about electing someone who will fight for the true progressive values that we share.

When I knock on my neighbors’ doors, I’m proud to say that I not only believe in creating an equitable society, I am lucky enough to do it every day through my work. If elected your State Senator, I will fight to protect women’s reproductive rights. I will push our General Assembly to finally pass marriage equality. I will work to build our economy back by supporting small businesses, investing in our infrastructure, and making our state an attractive place for people to live and work. I will work to build a strong public school system that values every child and I will support health care that is accessible and affordable to everyone.

We need to make sure our next state senator from the East Side carries on our values of integrity, equality, and opportunity to the State House, and that she represents the voices of the East Side. If I haven’t already met you, I hope we can before the September 11th primary. I encourage you to reach out to me with ideas at www.gaylegoldin.com or on Facebook at GayleGoldinforRI. I know that together we will create a stronger, fairer and more equitable Rhode Island for all of us.

Poor Edumacation In CD1 Democratic Debate


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Education. We spend a lot of time arguing about this. Wave after wave of education reformer has appeared, each with their own unique (and often uniquely wrong) method of “solving” education. And boy, if you cared at all education issues, the CD1 Democratic debate was not your night.

Public Schools

The Journal‘s Edward Achorn asked a leading question about supplying school vouchers. Thankfully, neither David Cicilline or Anthony Gemma support those. But if you thought Democrats were staunch defenders of public schools, you might be asking yourself if you could get some new defenders.

Gemma Says Providence Public School Grads Are Stupid

This had to be the point when I, personally, wanted to strangle Mr. Gemma, because he wasn’t just attacking Mr. Cicilline (I don’t particularly care about that), he was attacking me and my friends. He attacked pretty much anyone who passed through Providence Schools from the years of 2003 and 2010. Actually, RI Future contributor Steve Ahlquist has the best line on this, so let me quote his tweet:

#WPRIdebate Gemma says my kids were failed by Providence School system. I’ll call my daughter at Cornell, break the news to her.

— steveahlquist (@steveahlquist) August 29, 2012

Full disclosure, I attended the same schools as Mr. Ahlquist’s daughter for 12 years. Unlike Mr. Gemma’s descriptions of us, we can, in fact, “read and write and do math” and are not in need of adult education. A great many Providence school grads are, contrary to the rumors produced by the haters, “productive members of society.” In fact, I can do statistical analysis, and my writing skills are on display here, and I’ve graduated from a four-year college in four years. Actually, from the time I graduated high school in the fifth year of Mr. Cicilline’s term, to 2010, four year high school graduation rates in Providence were higher by 10 percentage points (increasing from 58% to 68%). What probably keeps Providence grads from being even more productive members of society is the lack of jobs.

No one from this school could possibly aspire to be Mayor of Providence or Governor of Rhode Island.

But the big problems with Mr. Gemma’s statements are that he over-relies on testing data, which is a crappy way of measuring education success. Kristina Rizga, of Mother Jones, recently published an article entitled “Everything You’ve Heard About Failing Schools Is Wrong“. In it she discusses just how distorting testing data is. And just how detrimental it is to good schools that people love. Her key line about getting good information other than testing data about how schools are doing: “It’s easier for a journalist to embed with the Army or the Marines than to go behind the scenes at a public school.”

And then, while trying to blame Mr. Cicilline for Providence’s problems, Mr. Gemma notes the issue is across the urban core. So either Mr. Cicilline is part of a trend of RI’s urban areas doing poorly on tests (speaking to structural/environmental issues), or he’s responsible for all of the urban areas doing poorly. I’d say the biggest problem with Mr. Cicilline’s tenure over my schools is that the department would hire a bunch of people who aren’t in the schools but seem to have all the answers to show up for like two years, and then leave when a higher paying job opens up. No one deigns to ask the students what’s going wrong. And here’s the thing, students have identified all the problems in the day-to-day operation of their schools. They know just what’s going wrong for them. No one in power is asking teachers what problems they’re having (other teachers are).

Hopefully the collaboration between the teachers’ union and the administration in Providence will yield some results. If they engaged the students via any one (but hopefully all) of the great student organizations in Providence, the schools would probably see incredible improvements.

Cicilline Says Kids Need to Compete

A couple of masters in engineering help a lady out.

I hear this a lot, George W. Bush said it as he inaugurated No Child Left Behind, tons of people talk about the need for children to compete. And it’s stupid. Look, if you want future American workers to be competitive with kids in India and China, educating them more is not the way to go. Notice how no one ever says we have to have our compete with top-ranked nations for education like Finland or South Korea. It’s always Mexico, Indonesia, and China we have to struggle against. That’s because the most competitive workers are the ones who don’t know any better.

I mean, what’s the cheapest worker? A slave or a serf. No one ever heard a slave owner or a feudal lord go, “man, if only my peons were more educated. Then they’d be more competitive.” No. It was “keep those books away from them. If they get too knowledgeable, they won’t know their place. No one wants to purchase an unruly worker.”

We used to understand this (ironically, back when there was actual slavery in this country’s living memory). We didn’t put public schools in place to produce workers. Horace Mann, the father of our public school system, wanted good American citizens. That’s the purpose of public education; to provide intelligent citizens. You know what doesn’t produce good citizens? Testing that demands that kids only know rote writing, reading, and math; and teaching that only supplies that. You want competitive workers, privatize and revert back to the past when only the wealthy got education. Then you’ll get people who don’t know any better but to take bad jobs at terrible wages.

You want good citizens who will build a strong America? Teach them how to think and question and argue and study. Teach them history and literature and philosophy and government and economics and science. Teach them how to be people, and not drones.

College Costs

Are you in debt? Yes? For that college education you got? Still? You mean, you didn’t graduate college and get that $40,000 a year job your college told you their average grad makes a year out of college? Weird. It’s almost like there’s terrible unemployment or something, and government no longer cares about full employment. Well, you can always go bankrupt. What? You can’t discharge your debt with bankruptcy? Good luck with that. When WPRI’s Ted Nesi asked this question to the candidates, they weren’t much help to the college student/graduate (full disclosure: I graduated college in debt).

Cicilline: Boy, That’s a Big Challenge

Damn right it is; college is where they teach both rocket science and brain surgery. Mr. Cicilline sure noted it was difficult, it would absolutely get more difficult much faster under Republican proposals, but he seemed mightily befuddled about how to solve the fact that over the last 30 years, the cost of college has risen 1120%. I suppose it’s worth noting that in 1980, Pell Grants covered 69% of a four-year, public university degree. In 2013, they’ll cover less than a third, a level of coverage that is the “lowest in history.” This despite their maximum amount being increased. Mr. Cicilline’s “that’s a difficult question, let’s have a conversation about this” approach doesn’t seem to me to signal the correct response to the immediacy of this problem. We could’ve talked about this in the late ’80s or early ’90s when the costs outstripped the Consumer Price Index. We should’ve been marshaling solutions in the early 2000s when it broke a 500% increase from 20 years before. But in 2012, we gotta say, “enough is enough, college costs are going to come down.” If that’s more government investment, or government interference, or a debt jubilee, or whatever, it doesn’t matter. By any means necessary, we cannot have colleges creating a new cohort of debtors every year. Frankly, a college education is not worth the amount we are paying for it.

Harvard is well known for being frugal with its money.

Gemma: Race to the Top!

Faced with this, Mr. Gemma could only go with “benchmarking against other institutions.” When Mr. Nesi pointed out that Harvard University is the top ranked college in the world, and its costs are ludicrously high, Mr. Gemma said something like, “well, benchmark against savings on paper goods.” Paper goods. Seriously. You know where we could save a ton of money on a paper good? Ending the cartel of book publishers which keep textbooks outrageously high (your seventeenth edition of Econ 101 is not worth $500, by any measure).

Mr. Gemma pointed out Race to the Top as an example of a way to benchmark. Now, all due respect to President Obama, but Race to the Top is George W. Bush’s No Child Left Behind-lite. It’s privatize, privatize, privatize. And private colleges are the ones that are really getting outrageously expensive, as the amount (and salaries) of administrative positions bloat budgets and colleges focus on amenities rather than professors to attract wealthy students. And that’s not to even get into for-profit colleges, which offer often fraudulent degrees at prices far above any other higher education institutions. So in the face of increased costs from the private sector, Mr. Gemma would look to the private sector for solutions on cutting costs?


Claiborne Pell, we need you now, more than ever.

Chris Christie’s Mom Didn’t Teach Him Enough


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Photo courtesy of humanevents.com

Chris Christie of New Jersey spoke last night at the RNC. I am not sure whose agenda he was pushing … his own or Mitt Romney’s.

Interesting that after I turned off the RNC speech made by Gov. Christie, I should see this in today’s Dr Diane Ravitch’s blog:

I will protect your pensions. Nothing about your  pension is going to change when I am governor. – Chris Christie, “An Open  Letter to the Teachers of NJ” October, 2009

In his speech, he mentions several times for dramatic effect, I supposed, by repeating it over and over was “that the greatest lesson his mother of Sicilian descent taught him was that there would be times in your life when you have to choose between being loved and being respected.  She said to always pick being respected-love is fleeting.”

Well, I have neither, for this hypocrite who slammed the NJ teacher union (where was the respect, Mr.Christie?) in his speech last night. He also called his mother “the enforcer” and that  “he was his mother’s son.”

My mother was an Italian Brooklyn mother, tough as nails, too. And her father, my grandfather was from Sicily….And I am my mother’s daughter, tough as nails. I speak my piece and  I let nothing go by that I feel is wrong. But my mother taught me not to insult people like he does; my mother taught me to be humble not arrogant like he is; my mother taught me to stand up for my rights but not be VAIN like he is; my mother taught me to stand up for my principles but not shove them down people’s throats like he did last night in his RNC speech.

And as far as I am concerned the only trip he is going to be on, in his future is his ego trip, not any political one.

Chris Christie is too high and mighty for his own good to capture the vote of anyone who has had to work hard to get and keep what they have, and I thank God every day I was never a New Jersey teacher working under cavalier, cocky and conceited Christie…

Raging Grannies Protest Forbes, Hinckely Event


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Steve Forbes, a multi-failed candidate for the presidential nomination of the Republican Party, will be hosting a fundraiser for Barry Hinckley’s campaign and the Raging Grannies of Greater Westerly will be present at 4:45pm to welcome them.

The event will be at The Ocean House in Watch Hill on Wednesday, August 29.

Mr. Forbes is famous for supporting many proposed reforms of entitlement plans. He has been a time-honored supporter of a program called Trickle-Up Economics, one of the major bipartisan productions that, during the last thirty years, has allowed the rich to appropriate a disproportionate fraction of the wealth of the USA, where the richest 400 people now own more collective wealth than the bottom 150 million.

Mr. Hinckley’s candidacy will continue in this tradition of entitlement programs designed to serve the wealthy. For instance, he told the Providence Journal in April of 2011 that he would cut Social Security benefits: “Citing Social Security as an example, [Hinckley] said he would not change benefits for people already collecting, but would change the assumptions for people who are still years away from collecting. ‘Future generations that are not in the program have to have their expectations reset. End of story,’ he said.”

Instead of receiving social security, in the world according to Mr. Hinckley, people will be doing their own private investing. In so doing, they will pay for an entitlement program for unearned income and bonuses of Wall Street bankers.

Mr. Hinckley is also on record supporting plans to turn Medicare into yet another entitlement program for the 1% by transforming Medicare into a voucher system as of 2022. This will leave seniors at the mercy of private insurers. His plans would do for Medicare what has already been accomplished for the health care insurance industry, where 20 cents of every premium dollar goes toward administrative costs and profit, so that only 80 cents is left to pay for actual health care. Medicare, by comparison, currently pays out more than 98 cents of each premium dollar for actual health care. The difference between the current corporate health care system, on the one hand, and Medicare For All, if it existed, on the other, costs every single one of us about $2,000 per year.

The Raging Grannies note that in spite of the already excessive contribution of the People to entitlement programs benefiting the wealthy, Mr. Hinckley and Mr. Forbes plan to hand over more and more of the nation’s wealth to their corporate paymasters and their criminal Wall Street friends.

Baldelli-Hunt, Brien Plead Dumb on 38 Studios Vote

The Cicilline-Gemma debate at Rhode Island College wasn’t the only question and answer session for candidates on Tuesday. In Woonsocket, constituents were invited to attend a candidate forum hosted by MyWoonsocket.com and WNRI radio to meet the candidates for General Assembly seats in the city.

Radio host Roger Bouchard moderated while local reporters Sandy Phaneuf of the Valley Breeze, Russ Olivo of the Woonsocket Call and Rob Borkowski of the Woonsocket Patch asked the questions.

While the candidates for Senate seats addressed the crowd first, the real fun began when the candidates for Representative came to the stage. Coming later in the questioning, Chris Roberts had the quote of the night when asked what he could get accomplished in the General Assembly as the only Republican running. “There are plenty of people in the the State House who are Republicans in hiding,” he replied while giving a slight glance back to the incumbents on the stage.

Rep. Baldelli-Hunt opened by stating she didn’t owe anyone anything, she was there as a watchdog and that you can’t spend what you don’t have. However, when she was called on her record later, she got very defensive about voting for the bill that authorized $75 million dollars for 38 Studios and the fact that she voted for tax breaks for the rich in 2010. More than once she complained that her opponent was misleading voters but her voting record is documented.

Michael Morin, her opponent in Rep. 49 admitted he would have voted for the supplemental tax bill if he had been in office because by not doing so, the members of the General Assembly, and especially those representing Woonsocket just kicked the can down the road and that he didn’t want Woonsocket to become another Central Falls, where the tax rate spiked to a 35 percent increase after they went into receivership. Despite Baldelli-Hunt’s protestations otherwise, Morin rightly pointed out that even if she never actually came out and advocated for bankruptcy for the city, her failure to act, along with the rest of the city’s delegation, led to a de facto course that would indeed lead to the city now being governed by a budget commission.

In the race for Rep. 50, Rep. Jon Brien pointed out the fact he championed the new Voter ID law and that he led the charge for pension reform but had to play defense on his role in co-sponsoring the 38 Studios legislation. His opponent, Steve Casey, pointed out that he would have worked to negotiate change rather than have pension change foisted upon employees and Morin jumped on the issue as well, stating that the mortality tables they used for firefighters were skewed, with legislators being led to believe the average life expectancy of a firefighter is 87 years old when in fact it is actually 72 years old.

Brien’s default position was that they needed “shared sacrifice” and that the taxpayers should be the last resort. Morin and Casey both jumped on that, saying that they should have worked over the course of the last two years to find $7.5 million in savings for the city. Roberts also jumped into the fray by stating that as a member of the school committee he’s been heavily involved in the budget commission hearings and that he’s not seen an elected Senator or Representative at any of the meetings. He even pointed out that the chairman of the commission has extended invitations to the General Assembly delegation from the city but none has taken him up on his offer to participate in discussions on the city’s future.

In a question about how they could bring more business into the city, Rep. Brien made a stunning statement that the city should do all it can to keep the right people while getting rid of the wrong people and that the first place to start would be to get rid of all the low income housing in the city.

Brien also stated later that Woonsocket, “was the Mill City,” and that they “should get back to their roots,” as he would work to enact legislation to get a waiver so the city could burn sludge in a waste to energy plant. There was no follow up on the question to ask Rep. Brien how that would lead to bettering the quality of life in the city.

Prior to the the House candidates, the candidates for the two Senate seats addressed the crowd. Roger Picard is unopposed and got two minutes to introduce himself and tell his constituents he’d be there if they needed him. After he left the stage to applause, the candidates for Senate seat 24 took the stage as incumbent Marc Cote and challenger Lew Pryeor answered questions.

Even as the newcomer, when asked, Pryeor was the one with quick answers, calling for more neighborhood participation, just like he organized in Warwick when he served on the City Council there. He stressed the need for involvement from the whole community and pushed for the formation of neighborhood associations that would build understanding. He offered that Fifth Avenue School could have been saved if the school department hadn’t hired two administrators for $200,000 but stated that since it was already done, he accepted it and would move forward.

Senator Cote, on the other hand, described his greatest achievements, among them being Woonsocket no longer being a toll call because of legislation he sponsored. He also touted his bill to alleviate taxes on businesses in the city. There was no follow up question about how that had worked out since there are many fewer businesses in Woonsocket since he sponsored that legislation.

In closing, Cote stated his opponent hadn’t made the case for change and that the voters should vote to keep things the same while Pryeor followed him by stating that after 18 years with the same man in office, nothing had really changed and that re-electing the same man would lead to no change.

While the candidates for Senate seats addressed the crowd first, the real fun began when the candidates for Representative came to the stage. Coming later in the questioning, Chris Roberts had the quote of the night when asked what he could get accomplished in the General Assembly as the only Republican running. “There are plenty of people in the the State House who are Republicans in hiding,” he replied while giving a slight glance back to the incumbents on the stage.

Rep. Baldelli-Hunt opened by stating she didn’t owe anyone anything, she was there as a watchdog and that you can’t spend what you don’t have. However, when she was called on her record later on, she got very defensive about voting for the bill that authorized $75 million dollars for 38 Studios and the fact that she voted for tax breaks for the rich in 2010. More than once she complained that her opponent was misleading voters but her voting record is documented.

Michael Morin, her opponent in Rep. 49 admitted he would have voted for the supplemental tax bill if he had been in office because by not doing so, the members of the General Assembly, and especially those representing Woonsocket just kicked the can down the road and that he didn’t want Woonsocket to become another Central Falls, where the tax rate spiked to a 35 percent increase after they went into receivership. Despite Baldelli-Hunt’s protestations otherwise, Morin rightly pointed out that even if she never actually came out and advocated for bankruptcy for the city, her failure to act, along with the rest of the city’s delegation, led to a de facto course that would indeed lead to the city now being governed by a budget commission.

In the race for Rep. 50, Rep. Jon Brien pointed out the fact he championed the new Voter ID law and that he led the charge for pension reform; reform that is now in question. His opponent, Steve Casey, pointed out that he would have worked to negotiate change rather than have it foisted upon them and Morin jumped into the fray as well, stating that the mortality tables they used for firefighters were skewed, with legislators being led to believe the average life expectancy of a firefighter is 87 years old when in fact it is actually 72 years old.

Brien’s default position was that they needed “shared sacrifice” and that the taxpayers should be the last resort. Morin and Casey both jumped on that, saying that they should have worked over the course of the last two years to find $7.5 million in savings for the city. Roberts also jumped into the fray by stating that as a member of the school committee he’s been heavily involved in the budget commission hearings and that he’s not seen an elected Senator or Representative at any of the meetings. He even pointed out that the chairman of the commission has extended invitations to the General Assembly delegation from the city but none has taken him up on his offer to participate in discussions on the city’s future.

In a question about how they could bring more business into the city, Rep. Brien made a stunning statement that the city should do all it can to keep the right people while getting rid of the wrong people and that the first place to start would be to get rid of all the low income housing in the city.

As for the production of the forum itself, it was very difficult to hear the questioners and Russ Olivo was barely audible. Several of the questions were duplicated and one from Rob Borkowski about accessibility was roundly criticized by several in the crowd as a softball. The questioners also did a disservice to the voters who attended by not asking Rep. Baldelli-Hunt if she would pledge to serve out the entire two year term and not run for mayor next year.

The one thing taken away from this forum is that incumbents Brien and Baldelli-Hunt cried foul over and over again and did so in very loud and accusatory tones while their opponents remained humble and stated fact. In the end it will all come down to if the assembled voters recognized the loud, bullying tactics of the experienced incumbents for what they were.

Gemma-Cicilline Debate: The Crowd Has No Rules


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Cicilline Interviewed At WPRI Debate
Cicilline Interviewed At WPRI Debate
Rep. David Cicilline cracks a smile as he takes questions from the press.

This debate was a pissing-match. But not between the candidates. Rather, their supporters, gathered together in a room, attempted to dominate one another by shouting out “liar” when either candidate spoke, booing, chanting their candidate’s name, etc.

For those sitting in the room trying to listen, it made for an unpleasant evening trying to hear their candidates over the shouting. I gather that at home, it was a more enjoyable experience (if you find debates enjoyable).

I question the decision (I assume by The Journal) to put Edward Achorn on the panel, which seems to be the wrong kind of person to put on a Democratic Party debate. Perhaps a Democrat might’ve been better suited to ask Democrats questions. That said, I can see the other side, which is that any Democrat would’ve been compromised in their support, and a right-winger is unlikely to care either way (personally, I think there are enough disaffected Democrats who dislike both candidates to find one willing to ask fair questions).

David Cicilline won this debate, but not as strongly as he should’ve. Without the hour spread out over four candidates, Anthony Gemma was without a doubt an opposition candidate. But not an ideal one. Mr. Gemma was unable to name a single policy or vote of Mr. Cicilline’s that he would’ve done differently, nor was he able to remember the name of a Republican he admired (someone from Texas who does legislation around breast cancer).

Interestingly, Mr. Gemma’s most forceful attack on Mr. Cicilline’s time as Mayor of Providence appeared to be attacking the stewardship of the education system. He also proposed that a program similar to “Race to the Top” be instituted to reduce higher education costs. He was short on specifics, but so was Mr. Cicilline, who said it was a difficult issue.

There were a couple of questions that seemed like neither candidate did well. For instance, when asked about what specifically they would cut, neither candidate came out in favor of massive defense spending cuts; even though a May 2012 poll by the Program for Public Consultation found that on average, 76% of Americans favored a 23% defense spending cut. Mr. Cicilline made a decent point about tax expenditures being spending rather than revenue, but he wasn’t able to name a specific tax expenditure other than the 40 billion in oil tax credits.

Both candidates seemed not too far apart on Iran (do everything possible to prevent war, then go to war). It would’ve been nice if a discussion of Syria had come up, since that conflict doesn’t offer the easy answer of “we have to stop nuclear weapons proliferation.” A real divisive issue was the USPS. Mr. Gemma took the businessman strategy: “streamline” the agency, and cut Saturday service. Mr. Cicilline attacked the laws that force the USPS to pre-fund their pension system, which puts it at a disadvantage with its private-sector competitors.

Oddly, a question on extending the terms of U.S. Representatives raised two viewpoints which were completely valid. Mr. Gemma chose the term-limits argument (cribbing from Bill Lynch’s playbook from the 2010 primary). Mr. Cicilline chose the campaign finance reform argument. Mr. Gemma’s viewpoint aligns with that of Jack Abramoff, who recommends it as a way to prevent the kind of corruption he was convicted as. And campaign finance reform was a bipartisan solution up until the moment Republicans decided they didn’t like it (plus it’s the right thing to do). Mr. Cicilline said exactly the right line in talking about this: “corporations are not people.” Mr. Gemma wasn’t as convincing trying to thread the needle on the need for term limits, yet acknowledging the implication is that good Congress people will be thrown out.

In fairness to Mr. Gemma, I thought it was wrong of the moderator Tim White to push on him for making RI-specific proposals that seem irrelevant to the U.S. House when one question asked specifically about who in the state deserves blame for 38 Studios (neither candidate blamed anyone specific), and another asked to grade Lincoln Chafee for no apparent reason (Mr. Cicilline refused to answer saying he wouldn’t grade anyone he had a working relationship with, Mr. Gemma said “C”). That said, Mr. Gemma does need to be pushed on it, because it’s stupid.

Finally voter fraud. For the crowd, this was the issue to intervene in. There isn’t much to say here. Either you believe Mr. Gemma or you think he’s a liar. Moderator Tim White eventually cut Mr. Gemma’s explanation of the issue short, saying that Mr. Gemma was still failing to provide actual evidence. We learned that Mr. Gemma has spent about $40,000 in campaign cash on his investigation of Mr. Cicilline. Mr. Cicilline eventually waggled his finger in Mr. Gemma’s face, saying that Mr. Gemma was not focusing on the correct issue at hand, instead talking about people holed up in their attics.

And that’s ultimately where the candidates differed. Mr. Cicilline returned numerous times to arguing against the Republican plan for America. Mr. Gemma remained focused on voter fraud and conspiratorial election-rigging, neglecting the Providence attack line that really worries voters, and makes even Mr. Cicilline’s supporters worried about his prospects in November.

But Mr. Cicilline never turned Mr. Gemma’s own talking points against him; he never said something like “how can Mr. Gemma talk about trust and integrity when he’s lying to Rhode Islanders about voter fraud and inflating his social media presence?”

Perhaps that was intentional; Mr. Cicilline’s focus on defeating the Republican Party led to two moments where he trumped Mr. Gemma. Mr. Cicilline would remain loyal to the Democratic candidate, even if his opponent who had so smeared him won; and Mr. Cicilline also admired the respect and honor Mr. Gemma has shown to his mother through the Gloria Gemma Foundation. In comparison, Mr. Gemma only like Mr. Cicilline’s tie, and would not vote for Mr. Cicilline.

I think the WPRI poll was more important to the coverage of this race than this debate.

Notes:

  • No handshake between the candidates.
  • Sorry I only got a picture of Mr. Cicilline. Mr. Gemma left before I could snap a photo with my iPhone camera.
  • I hope that the WPRI employee who was carried off the stage is okay.

North Kingstown School Committee Silences Crowd


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Unon members and residents packed a North Kingstown School Committee meeting.

About 300 people packed the North Kingstown High School auditorium for the school committee meeting, many of whom planned to address committee members about their decision to outsource custodians’ jobs to an out-of-state company.

And if you think they were upset at the beginning of the meeting when Dick Welch made a motion to move public comment to the end of the agenda, you should have heard them when the committee closed the meeting without letting the people have their say.

“Shame on you, shame on you,” chanted the crowd, filled with both local residents and union members from around the state.

School committee member Don Boscardin said they adjourned because the crowd was getting too rowdy. Welch declined to comment to RI Future.

Throughout the meeting, members bickered with each other over issues as small as how much toilet paper should be purchased for the next fiscal year.

Committee members Bill Mudge and Melvoid Benson played to the crowd by stalling the meeting with a myriad of mundane questions. School staff and Committee President Kim Page responded by talking down to them and sometimes cutting them short.

Mudge said in an email earlier in the day that the other committee members have frozen he and Benson out of the negotiating process. During the meeting, he threatened to reveal discussions from executive session.

“For the record, I was never advised by phone, e-mail or while I speaking with Mrs. Berglund and/or Mrs. Benson that a negotiations meeting had been convened and was underway in the superintendent’s office between ESP Union officials, Dr. Auger and School Committee Members Mrs. Page, Mr. Ceresi, Mr. Boscardin, and Mrs. Avanzato,” he wrote.

Earlier in the day, the union agreed to return to work on Wednesday, according to Judge Brian Stern, who was hearing a request for an injunction to end the work stoppage. In exchange, the school department agreed to continue working towards a resolution with the union.

The school committee still has some 30 days to nullify its contract with the out-of-state company hired to clean the public schools, though union officials expressed doubt that an agreement could be reached outside of a court decision. There are still some grievances and unfair labor practice complaints that could reverse the decision.

NK Evades Responsibility With Custodian Contract


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

I woke up today to an automated phone call from the school superintendent telling me that the first day of school in North Kingstown has been delayed by a strike. The Educational Support Personnel (ESP) union has walked out over the School Committee’s action to outsource the jobs of all 26 janitors, and so my daughter is home today instead.

As is usual, there is a welter of claims and counter-claims. The ESP union offered some pretty substantial concessions this spring. They say they met the dollar figure the School Committee had insisted was necessary. The Committee responded that they were close, but the superintendent had already budgeted some of the savings the union was offering so they needed more. An arbitrator was called in and that report offered a way to save $1.3 million over two years, but again that was measured over the previous year, not over the proposed budget, which already included some of those savings, so it wasn’t enough.

In response, the School Committee voted 5-2 to outsource the 26 custodian jobs. They did insist that the new contractor hire back as many of the custodians as possible, and I gather that 21 of them took the new deal: their old jobs at about 70% of salary, minus the health insurance and pension. In other words, around a 40-45% pay cut, give or take. Would you take that?

I talked to my daughter about this, and she told me about the custodian at the middle school who had encouraged her with a model car she and some classmates built for a Science Olympiad competition in seventh grade (their team won the state event, and went to the national event in Wisconsin that year), and about the elementary school custodian who talked and joked with the children in the cafeteria, but also knew them all, even the first graders. Those are the kind of people you get when the jobs are good jobs.

But I guess that kind of thing is to be part of the past now. Instead of jobs that can support a family, we’ll have jobs that people move through. We’ll have custodial staff stretched thinner, and we’ll have an outsourcing company that is making good money off the deal, that indispensable part of what some people call progress.

Will the district save money?  Maybe this year. But the teacher contract comes up in the fall. What do you suppose will be their level of enthusiasm when the School Committee requests concessions to get through this fiscal storm?

Oh yes, that storm. In all the ire directed at the School Committe in this dispute, let’s not forget that it was the actions of the Town Council that precipitated this crisis. The School Committee told them last winter that they weren’t going to be able to meet the property-tax caps imposed by the state without severe pain. In response, the Town Council cut the school budget even further than the property tax cap demands. North Kingstown has a notoriously dysfunctional School Committee, but it was Council President Elizabeth Dolan, and members Michael Bestwick, Charlie Stamm, Carol Hueston, and Charles Brennan who have effectively put the screws to the custodians.

Council members I’ve spoken to seem proud that they’re willing to hold the line on taxes, but at what cost?  North Kingstown’s taxes are already lower than average in the state, according to the tax effort formula defined in state law (75.5% of the average). In a conversation one summer evening this past July, one council member told me with certainty about the waste that could be cut out of the school budget. As I usually notice when people decry government waste to me, the member could supply no specific suggestion to cut beyond the job of an assistant to the superintendent, a cost of less than one fifteenth the amount they insisted be cut.

The custodian contract wasn’t the only change this year. Just looking at the high school (where my family’s attention is focused, for better or worse), the foreign language offerings have been slashed, school supplies cut way back, and graduation requirements lowered, all for budget reasons.

One of the curiosities of government around here that we take for granted is that we elect School Committee members, and don’t give them the independence to make their own decisions. I’m doing policy consulting work in other states lately, and I’ve noticed that in lots of states — maybe the majority outside New England — school departments are a parallel government, operated independently of the city or county where they are located, often with separate tax bills. School Committee members there are directly responsible to voters for the decisions they make. Around here, by contrast, the School Committee is subservient to the City or Town Council. The North Kingstown Council has spoken, its members are largely responsible for the budget crisis in the school department, but they take no heat for that. Union press releases inveigh against the School Committee, but ignore the Town Council. This, it seems to me, is the opposite of taking responsibility.

So, Liz Dolan: Your Council cut the school budget. You overruled the opinions of the people supposedly responsible for that budget. Where exactly is the waste?  Michael Bestwick: Precisely what would you cut? Charles Brennan: Where else do we find savings?  Please be specific. Carol Hueston: What other jobs are to be outsourced?  Charlie Stamm: How do we settle this dispute?  It is the straightforward consequence of your decisions: how will you defend those choices?  Or will you just hope no one notices that you were behind the hard choices made by someone else?

VIDEO: Labor Strike Cancels School in North Kingstown


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

North Kingstown cancelled school today as a result of all school personnel striking in solidarity with the custodians whose jobs were outsourced to a private company earlier this summer.

About 70 school employees marched and formed a picket line in front of North Kingstown High School this morning, and plan to rally again tonight at a school committee meeting.

Several union members said negotiations ended with Superintendent Phil Auger ended at about 10:30 last night, even though they were willing to keep working towards a deal. School was not cancelled until 6:30 this morning. One parent at the high school this morning, a non-union member, said his family got the call just 15 minutes before the school bus was supposed to arrive.

Earlier this summer the school committee rejected the decision of an arbitrator that would have saved the district more than $1.3 million over the next two years and instead fired the school custodians and outsourced their jobs to an out-of-state company. Some custodians were hired back but at an approximately 30 percent cut in salary.

Teachers were not on the picket line this morning, but voted unanimously yesterday afternoon not to cross it either. While teachers voted to do so for at least two days, several union members at the high school this morning said they expect a court injunction will remand employees back to work as early as today.

Union officials said they will not ask members to defy a court order. Instead, they hope today’s action will ignite the interest of the people, who may be more persuasive in changing school committee members’ minds that union intermediaries have been.

Bill Mudge, a member of the school committee, has filed an Open Meetings Act complaint with the Attorney General’s office and has implored his colleagues to come back to the negotiating table.

Here’s a video of Nancy Ferencko, president of the education support professionals union in the North Kingstown school system addressing those on the picket line this morning:

Cicilline vs. Gemma in the Rumble At RIC Tonight


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
David Cicilline and Anthony Gemma
David Cicilline (L) and Anthony Gemma (R)

Tonight, Representative David Cicilline and Anthony Gemma will face each other head-to-head in WPRI’s televised debate. Unlike two years ago, it will only be the two of them, meaning that voters will be presented with a clear choice.

And this may be one of the most heated, or ugly, debates ever.

In comparison to two years ago, Mr. Gemma’s attacks on Mr. Cicilline have been beyond the pale. Yet, Mr. Cicilline appears to be the weakest in his electoral career since his loss to then-Sen. Rhoda Perry in 1992, two decades ago. Though a new WPRI poll shows Cicilline with a 12 point lead over Gemma, three times what it was for the last poll.

Going into this debate, both candidates have vastly different goals. Mr. Cicilline must project confidence while addressing voters’ fears about Providence. It’s a precarious position he’s in, the city of Providence is entirely out of his hands, yet his fate is inextricably tied up with it. He needs to address the fear of dishonesty voters have about him. Essentially he must use the debate to as a dry run against attacks likely to be used against him by Republican candidate Brendan Doherty in a general election; while at the same time focusing the race on national issues. And yet, he needs to do all this while warding off Mr. Gemma who will be standing right next to him.

Mr. Gemma, on the other hand, needs to project that his campaign has not come untethered. Unsupported allegations of voter fraud, an attack by an unpaid campaign worker comparing Mr. Cicilline to convicted child rapist Jerry Sandusky condemned not only by the state Democratic Party but also by his former field director (no fan of Mr. Cicilline’s) who accused Mr. Gemma’s campaign of rampant homophobia… and finally, Monday’s polling data from WPRI which put Mr. Cicilline with a comfortable 12 point lead over Mr. Gemma among likely Democratic primary voters. Plus, with nearly half of those voters unable to give him a favorability rating, this debate will virtually be Mr. Gemma’s only chance to introduce himself to the primary electorate.

Perennial candidate Chris Young polls 4.3% in the poll, within the +/- 5.7% margin of error. Mr. Young probably acts as a slight spoiler on Mr. Gemma’s campaign, though his effects are probably negligible.

Mr. Gemma now faces long odds. More than a campaign season has passed between this and the last poll of this election. That lack of polling actually served Mr. Gemma, since the lack of contrary evidence meant he could claim to be capable of defeating Mr. Cicilline. But now, that’s called into serious doubt. Not helpful was Monday’s flap about his campaign worker’s tweet, it looks as though Mr. Gemma’s campaign organization is disorganized, and the story of why his field director left is still unknown.

Mr. Cicilline, while certainly capable of winning the nomination, is in no way a shoo-in. He still has to win over voters who are unhappy with his performance as mayor, or skeptical of him as a Congressman. Call them loyalist-skeptics. The sort of people dismayed at the choices awaiting them: a vulnerable incumbent in Mr. Cicilline or a supremely unqualified insurgent in Mr. Gemma. And either will go up against Mr. Doherty, who will be considered “moderate” or a “maverick” if he only votes with his increasingly radical right-wing party 80% of the time. Polling bears this out. 48.1% of these loyalist-skeptics are uncertain of who they’d vote for if Mr. Cicilline loses the Democratic primary. Faced with a choice between Mr. Gemma and Mr. Doherty, many may well decide not to vote in the CD1 race.

Logo for RI Democratic PartyMr. Cicilline is further damaged by the reluctance of Mr. Gemma’s supporters to vote for him. I’ve long labelled Mr. Gemma’s supporters as a loose “anti-Cicilline coalition.” The WPRI poll supports this label. 52.1% of his voters would back Mr. Doherty in November. Merely 28.7% would stay loyal to the Democratic candidate (and Republicans accuse RI voters of undue party tribalism towards the Democrats). Had this anti-Cicilline coalition been able to field a more credible candidate than Mr. Gemma, it seems likely they would be polling ahead of Mr. Cicilline, and might well be in shape to maintain Democratic control of CD1.

Unfortunately for them, their candidate is Anthony Gemma. Mr. Gemma has taken what appeared to be a simple task: annihilate Mr. Cicilline on Providence’s financial straits and Mr. Cicilline’s previous statements about its health and then pivot to national issues after the primary; and turned it into a mess involving theoretical (and near impossible) mass conspiracy to defraud elections on the part of the Democratic Party. He also has failed to woo the press, a key need for an insurgent candidate short on cash. Instead, Mr. Gemma’s strategy has been to slowly string the press along; over-hyping campaign events and under-delivering. The press hates this. Mr. Gemma’s “it’s about jobs” campaign slogan is attached to a promise of 10,000 jobs, the sort of promise a gubernatorial candidate might make is simply not sticking. And at times, it’s seemed like he’s the third wheel in this race; Mr. Doherty’s campaign has never even deigned to attack him, instead gearing their whole campaign against David Cicilline.

Make no mistake or quibble about it, the Rhode Island Democratic Party finds itself in the tightest spot in CD1 it’s been in in a long time. This is an election it should, by all rights, be able to easily win. Its Republican counterpart is woefully weak, its voters are reliably Democratic under normal circumstances, the national Republican Party is seen as the party of the rich and fueled by a Tea Party movement which has surpassed atheists as the most hated group in America. Its inability to deal with the flaws of its incumbent, either by defusing the attack or removing the incumbent, speaks to broader issues in the Party.

This will not be the election in which it finally has a conversation about those issues. Instead, it will be one where it hobbles on, regardless.

NK School Committeeman Cries Foul On Outsourcing


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Bill Mudge, North Kingstown School Committee (Photo courtesy of NKSD)

North Kingstown School Committee member Bill Mudge said the school committee and superintendent have not negotiated in good faith with the custodians and its union and said at “Tuesday night’s meeting I will request a vote of the entire S/C to hold a special/open meeting to consider the unions June 26, 2012 proposal” in an email he sent out to state and town officials Monday evening.

“Unfortunately, I believe that there has been complete breakdown in the negotiation process, absence of School Committee leadership and that school committee erred, when it failed to consider the union’s proposal presented to Attorney Carroll on June 26,” he wrote in the email.

All school personnel have decided either to strike or not cross a picket line today, which was supposed to be the first day of school. They are protesting the huge wage cuts custodians took when their jobs were outsourced to a private company.

The school committee meets tonight.

Mudge has been critical of the way the school committee has handled the situation with the 26 custodians, whose jobs were outsourced to the private company GCA and took an average pay cut of about $13,000.

“What happened was most unethical,” he said in a phone interview earlier in the day. “I don’t know what the ultimate result would have been but we didn’t bargain in good faith and I am ashamed to be on the school committee.”

Mudge said the school committee received a decision from an arbitrator on June 26 that would save the district more than $1.3 million over two years. Later on the same day, the school committee agreed in executive session to proceed with privatizing school custodial services.

“We had all received a copy of arbitrators award and we had a meeting that night,” he said. “Nobody really looked at it and the superintendent said he disagreed with it.”

Mudge walked out of that meeting, he said, because he didn’t think the school committee followed open meetings rules when it went into executive session. He later filed a complaint with the Attorney General.

“My issue is not necessarily the result, it’s the process,” he said.

The school committee ultimately signed a contract with the out-of-state company rather than agree to the terms laid out by the arbitrator.

School Committee Chair Kim Page indicated in a reply email to Mudge that she does not think he has the votes to pass his motion at Tuesday’s meeting.

“Poll the committee all you want Bill,” she wrote in reply to his email. “If you get even 3 votes to attend your meeting, I would be shocked.”

Here’s Mudge’s entire email:

I am writing you because I am concerned about the subject notice posted on the NKSD website which states “While School Committee labor negotiations continue with the NK Educational Support Professionals, there remains a possibility that this union may strike on Tuesday and force the closure of school.  Right now both sides continue to meet, and we are doing all we can to avert a work stoppage, but I am writing to you to give you some advance notice to make contingency plans for your children’s care should the NKESP go forward with a strike.”

First, as a member of the school committee, I (and I believe Mrs. Benson) am unaware of any continuing labor negotiations currently ongoing with the NK Educational Support Professionals.  Regardless, to the best of my knowledge, on June 26, 2012 NKESP union officials did provide additional contract concessions to Mary Ann Carroll, attorney for the North Kingstown School Committee’s (NKSC), with the understanding that Attorney Carroll would present the new proposal to the NKSC that evening.  It is also my understanding, Attorney Carroll attempted to present the unions proposal to the school committee, however it was rejected out of hand by committee members Welch, Page, Avanzato and Boscardin.

Second, I am also unaware of any ongoing negotiations with ESP union officials since March 13, 2012, when at that time a motion was made by Lynda Avanzato and seconded by John Boscardin to dissolve the Negotiations Sub-Committee and subsequently passed by a 4 to 1 vote.  Mrs. Avanzato’s and Mr. Welch’s rationale to dissolve the committee was predicated on their assertion that when the committee moves into arbitration, it’s the entire committee that becomes involved.  Thus, any interface or discussion with union officials by a School Committee Member or members and Superintendent Auger were not authorized and therefore not representative of the School Committee.  Additionally, Attorney Carroll has not been authorized to represent the school committee in any matters concerning union negotiations.

Third, since the June 26, 2012 school committee meeting I have attempted on several occasions, to poll all NKSC members to hold a special or emergency school committee meeting to address the unions latest proposal; however, Chairperson Page has continually rejected each of my requests, in violation of our own school committee policy.  Because of Chairperson Page’s in transient’s and unwillingness to bargain in good faith, on August 12, 2012, I filed several Open Meetings Act complaints with the Atty. Gen.’s office regarding the procedural conduct of the June 26 meeting and because the school committee voted, in essence, to rejected the unions new proposal in violation of the OMA.

Fourth, I would like to point out that on the evening of June 25, 2012, during executive session, and after only a 20 minute discussion of an arbitrator’s 25 page decision and award which had just been received and included $621,000 and $687,000 of budget savings in FY13 and FY14 respectively, the school committee voted to fire the janitorial staff.  Furthermore the decision was predicated and accepted “without question” on Superintendent Auger’s assertion that the amount of savings cited by the arbitrator was incorrect and would not be realized, despite the fact that the arbitrator’s written statement that “most of the values were provided by the school committee as part of its evidence in this case.”  I feel the S/C owed its valued long time employees the professional courtesy to at least validate the accuracy and/or disparity between the arbitrators and Dr. Auger’s calculated savings.

As outlined above, I have done everything possible since February, when I was first appointed to the now defunct negotiations committee, to ensure that School Committee and the ESP union were bargaining in good faith.  Unfortunately, I believe that there has been complete breakdown in the negotiation process, absence of School Committee leadership and that school committee erred, when it failed to consider the union’s proposal presented to Attorney Carroll on June 26, 2012.  As such, and in regard to the rumored statement there “will be a work stoppage” resulting in school closure,  I respectfully request that all union employees continue to work their normal work day schedules until the S/C meets this Tuesday.  In turn, I give you my word of honor that  at the Tuesday night’s meeting I will request a vote of the entire S/C to hold a special/open meeting to consider the unions June 26, 2012 proposal.  I believe this is a win, win proposal for both parties and the parents and children of our community, even if only for a day.

 

Troubling Patterns Plague Gemma Campaign

Dating back to March, RIFuture has taken the lead in exposing the troubling patterns of deceit and desperate political stunts by the Gemma campaign. But today’s hateful homophobic comment by Gemma staffer Anthony Sionni, which compares David Cicilline to a convicted child molester, is a new low.

The RI Democratic Party’s LGBTQ Caucus issued the following release:

RI Dems LGBTQ Caucus: Gemma Should Denounce Homophobic Innuendo
by Rhode Island Democratic Party on Monday, August 27, 2012 at 6:49pm ·
News Release issued Aug. 27, 2012

Rhode Island Democratic Party LGBTQ Caucus Chair Anthony DeRose, speaking on behalf of the caucus members, today issued the following in response to the comments by Gemma staffer Anthony Sionni and the subsequent statement issued by the Gemma campaign:

“We call on Mr. Gemma to strongly and publicly denounce this kind of hateful and homophobic innuendo. There is no question that the statement made by Anthony Sionni, a member of ‘Team Gemma’ is more than just ‘inappropriate’ it is despicable,” said DeRose. “At a time when the economy, public safety and equality for all Rhode Islanders should be the true focus of the congressional campaign, Mr. Gemma and his staff have chosen to take the lower road of insults and personal attacks instead. This type of dirty politics has no place in Rhode Island or in the process of the American democracy.”

Sadly, this is not the first case of a Gemma staffer using such despicable homophobic innuendo. Charles Drago, who was paid $10,500 for political consulting services to Gemma in 2010 and continues to be one of Gemma’s most vocal surrogates, has also referred to David Cicilline in a deplorable manner. Drago has had a longstanding grudge with Cicilline because he felt that Cicilline promised him a city job that never materialized.

Here is an excerpt from RIFuture dating back to 2009 from Drago describing why he holds a grudge against Cicilline. Note the homophobic innuendo right from the offset:

 

In the comments section of another RIFuture post from 2009, Drago makes another homophobic statement:

After refusing to stop making such hateful comments, Drago was subsequently banned from RIFuture.

It’s also interesting to note that Drago worked on the 2002 Cicilline campaign that he is now claiming orchestrated massive voter fraud. Drago has made other outlandish claims, such as “[I]t is David Cicilline who, for a decade, has conducted a reign of terror in Hispanic communities.” It is baffling that Anthony Gemma would hire someone like Drago to be one of his top advisers.

I hope that the mainstream media finally starts giving some serious scrutiny to Gemma’s staffers and surrogates, many of whom have enormous credibility issues and take no issue with making nasty homophobic comments.

Update: Scott MacKay reports that a former Gemma staffer left the campaign due to homophobia.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387