Israel’s Policies Similar to South African Apartheid


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Photo by Wissam Nassar

Severe civilian death tolls in the siege of Gaza and calls for war with Iran by Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu call attention to the reality of the Apartheid state imposed by Israel on the Palestinian people.

The existence of Apartheid was verified recently in a poll of 503 Jewish Israelis published by Haaretz, of which 58% said they believe that there is Apartheid in Israel.  They are not alone.  A plethora of Jewish and non-Jewish activists, political leaders, and philosophers have likened the condition in Israel and the occupied territories to South African Apartheid.

Those who reject the notion that Israel is an Apartheid state argue that within Israel, a liberal democracy functions with participation in government by multiple parties including Arab parties. Also, Arab citizens of Israel are treated in hospitals next to Jews, share the same drinking fountains and so forth, which never could have occurred under South African Apartheid.

Israel, however, maintains control of how many non-Jews are allowed inside its borders. Palestinians, many of whom are, or are children of the 711,000 Arabs forcibly removed in 1948 from lands inside Israel’s borders, live in the Israeli occupied territories of Gaza and the West Bank.  Those who try to enter Israel are considered illegal immigrants and are sometimes shot when they even approach the border.  In the occupied West Bank, Palestinians are subjected to severe restriction of movement, being forced to drive on a separate road system from Jewish settlers there. Palestinian settlements there are being surrounded with high concrete walls which destroy farmland and make it difficult to access.  Palestinian residents of these lands under Israeli control have no rights of Israeli citizenship, access to services, or representation in the government.

Apartheid in S. Africa bore an uncanny resemblance. Blacks were removed from the white areas and forced on to “Bantustans” or “Townships” which were declared to be independent nations. There, blacks were deprived of the rights of citizenship and were made to carry passports to visit white areas. Israel was the only country, except for S. Africa, to recognize these “Nations”, institutions of the Apartheid state.

Israel and S. Africa have different histories but are implementing the same policies. President Jimmy Carter, author of Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid stated “that the system of Apartheid in Palestine is not based on racism but the desire of a minority of Israelis for Palestinian land and the resulting suppression of protests that involve violence.”  However, both countries were established in the colonial model, both forcibly relocated indigenous populations, and each formed a nation around a racial identity.  In both systems the threat of violent resistance to Apartheid policies has been used to justify separation.

The growing realization that Israel operates an Apartheid state will eventually cause that state to succumb under the threat of international divestment as S. Africa did. Israel faces the choice that President F.W. de Klerk of S. Africa faced, to end Apartheid and share power with those of another race or face growing international isolation.

In EG, DePetro, RI Future’s Hometown, It’s a Holiday Tree


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Photo courtesy of EG Patch.

The decorated tree in front of East Greenwich Town Hall, like the one on the State House rotunda, is called a holiday tree, reports East Greenwich Patch.

“Was this a Christmas Tree lighting?” wrote editor Elizabeth McNamara. “Not according to the notation on the town’s calendar, which referred to a ‘holiday tree lighting.'”

Ironically enough, East Greenwich is the hometown of both John DePetro, who has repeatedly attacked Gov. Chafee for continuing the tradition of terming the State House decoration with a secular monicker, and me, who has defended the governor for doing so.

Who would have thought East Greenwich, with its all-GOP Town Council, would side with progressive RI Future over conservative WPRO!?!

Well me, actually … not only did I tip off EG Patch to this last night, but also as was reported in Patch earlier in the week, East Greenwich is actually a lot more liberal than the local elected officials would have people believe. This dynamic is evident on this very issue: the town calls it a holiday tree but Council President Michael Isaacs says it’s a Christmas tree after the fact.

It will be telling if this goes unreported on WPRO today as that would lend credence to the criticism that the station is using the issue to beat up on Chafee, who generally snubs WPRO talk show hosts.

Maybe the holiday tree issue has something to do with the 02818 zip code area. Not only do DePetro and I live here, but Chafee lives in nearby Potowmut, which is technically part of Warwick but closer in geography and demographics to East Greenwich. Former Governor Don Carcieri lived here in East Greenwich when he called it a holiday tree as governor, too.

It’s also interesting that this issue would bubble up at the municipal level here in the 02818 zip code, as Chafee is also a neighbor of me and DePetro. He lives in the Potowomut section of Warwick that is actually closer to East Greenwich than Warwick.

RI—What Went Wrong: Competitiveness


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The devastating effect of property tax hikes and the less significant effect of a high unemployment insurance tax, discussed in previous columns, probably explain most of the portion of the unemployment gap that’s not explained by austerity. However, there is one more factor that might play a minor role in weakening our economy with respect to other states’. That factor is competitiveness. By competitiveness, I am not referring to the argument popular among conservatives that Massachusetts somehow has a more “competitive” individual income tax rate than Rhode Island. All that’s necessary to debunk that myth is to plot the tax rates:

Income tax rates in Massachusetts and Rhode Island.
Income tax rates in Massachusetts and Rhode Island.*
List of states by median household income, including Washington DC. Data from the Census Bureau.

What I am referring to is actual competitiveness. Although the Ocean State GOP would have you think otherwise, Rhode Island is not the poorest state in the union. Actually, we rank a bit above the average. The issue is that we are much poorer than the other blue states that surround us, as the rankings of states by median household income show.

As a blue state with a long history of unusually conservative government, this is to be expected. It does, however, have some consequences for our economy. By being a moderately wealthy state surrounded by much more successful states, we get many of the disadvantages of affluence with few of its benefits. One way this manifests itself is the strength of our currency. Because the Northeast is a wealthy region, it has a strong dollar, but this is more of a regional trend than a state-based one. A strong currency makes it harder for a state to compete in trade, which is why we want the Chinese to let their currency strengthen. This probably results in a trade deficit for Rhode Island, but the government does not track the trade positions of individual states, so it is impossible to know for sure. At the same time, we also suffer from competition with wealthier neighboring states, which can offer both lower taxes and better government services because of their wealth, as Josh Barro points out in Forbes. Competition probably explains a small portion of our unemployment gap, but the bulk of the blame falls on massive austerity and unusually silly tax polices.

There is little we can do about these structural disadvantages, but we can definitely learn from our mistakes.  Read tomorrow’s column, the last in this series, to find out how.
(Due to an editorial error, this piece ran out of order. It should have ran on Friday.)
*Graph updated to correct for an error (an out of date Massachusetts tax rate).