Linc, Gina At Odds Again


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Gina Raimondo, Linc Chafee and Allan Fung, at an event to launch the campaign to cut pensions in 2011. (Photo by Bob Plain, courtesy of WPRO.)

It’s interesting that both Gov. Linc Chafee and General Treasurer Gina Raimondo will be far flung tomorrow, talking about Rhode Island’s success in slashing public sector pensions.

For one thing, the issue is far from resolved. In fact, the courts only begin to consider the matter this Friday. And if precedent from other states is any indication, the matter of pension reform is still far from resolved.

And for another, Chafee and Raimondo are far from being on the same page on the matter. Shocker, I know.

I got an email from Gina the other day saying the public sector pension system had been “fixed … once and for all.”

Then Tim White reported last night that Chafee wants to work on a compromise with labor as the issue winds its way through the court system.

“In any litigation it’s common practice to have negotiations,” Chafee told WPRI. “I’m in favor of that: of having negotiation as litigation goes forward.”

To recap: as far as Gina is concerned, the issue has been put to bed. Linc, on the other hand, prefers the more proactive approach. And, just in case you were wondering, these two oft-adversaries probably aren’t playing good cop/bad cop with the unions.

Speaker of the House Gordon Fox is so far siding with Raimondo. His spokesperson Larry Berman sent me the same exact statement he gave to WPRI a day earlier.

“I am extremely proud of the process which led to the historic enactment of comprehensive pension reform that I sponsored in the House of Representatives.  After months of review, which included 30 hours of open public testimony, we enacted a bill that we believe will withstand the challenge currently pending in our courts.”

Which was one better than what I got from Senate President Teresa Paiva Weed’s spokesperson, who didn’t get back to me.

Providence Mayor Angel Taveras weighed in on the issue, seeming to suggest the state should negotiate while it’s still in the driver’s seat.

“A loss in the litigation will eliminate any leverage that the state has to negotiate,” Taveras told Ian Donnis of RIPR. “And it’s going to require negotiation if you lose, but you’re going to be negotiating without leverage so I think it’s important to be doing it from a position of strength.”

As far as organized labor is concerned, they are pleased Chafee hasn’t closed the door on their interests.

“If the treasurer doesn’t want to talk and the governor does, we’ll sit down with anyone in the executive branch who is willing to sit down,” said Bob Walsh, the executive director of NEA-RI, the state’s largest teachers’ union. “The governor has the right to lead those talks.”

Plenty of Christmas Trees at State House, and Creches


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
State House Holiday Tree

The Governor has banned Christmas from the State House! Except, of course, he hasn’t.

There is hardly a building in Rhode Island more decorated for the coming Christmas season than the RI State House.

Sure, the tree at the center of the State House rotunda (and also at the center of the fake controversy being promulgated by the likes of John DePetro, Doreen Costa, Bishop Tobin and Fox News) has been designated a “Holiday Tree” in deference to the wide range of religious and non-religious beliefs held by the citizens of our state, but there are almost two dozen other trees scattered around the State House, all but one of which are clearly intended to be, if not outright identified as, Christmas Trees.

An Atheist Tree?


But for those who might feel that Christmas Trees just aren’t Christmas-y enough, that they don’t really get into the anti-Grinch-like meaning of the holiday, which is after all about the baby Jesus, well you are in luck. There are plenty of manger scenes scattered about as well.


For years now the second floor of the State House has been the location of Guatemalan, Puerto Rican, German, Irish and Chilean Christmas trees positioned next to tables that display the cultural heritage of these groups. These Christmas trees are often loaded with religious symbols, and the tables more likely than not contain nativity scenes centered around the birth of Jesus.

Perhaps DePetro forgoes mentioning these displays because they celebrate Rhode Island’s proud immigrant cultures, and we all know that DePetro has little patience for immigrants and immigrant rights.

There is one other decorated evergreen in the State House, located in the formal State Room, next to a delicious smelling gingerbread house in front of which a Santa Claus figure has landed his sleigh. You won’t hear a peep from the Governor’s critics on this tree, even though it is “clearly a Christmas tree” to borrow their common phrasing, “and should be called a Christmas Tree.”

Heroes Tree

This is the Heroes Tree, erected and decorated to honor military families. And it is a Heroes Tree, not a Christmas tree, because Christians are not the only American heroes. This tree is not placed in such a special spot because we are interested in only honoring those military families that happen to be Christian and celebrate Christmas. This tree is meant to honor the military families that might identify as Christian but don’t celebrate Christmas, as well as non-Christian military families including, but not limited to Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Humanists, Pagans, Atheists, and any other belief system you can imagine.

As a symbol to honor military families, the Heroes Tree is imperfect. Decorated evergreens are far too commingled with the Christian celebration of Christmas to ever be considered truly inclusive symbols. The brouhaha over the Governor’s decision is ample proof of this. Non-Christians may rightly feel that the symbol does not truly represent their beliefs. Founding father John Adams said, “The United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion” and we would do well to remember that when we cavalierly assert Christian privilege at this time of the year.

Daily Show Declares ‘War on Christmas’ a Joke


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Sometimes only the court jester can successfully call out the king for wearing no clothes. While Fox News, John DePetro, Bishop Tobin and Rep. Doreen Costa are hardly still royalty in post-tea party America, John Stewart can still shed some sanity on their completely fabricated and self-indulgent “war on Christmas.”

After all, I’m certain the vast majority of us agree this annual holiday assault from the right has more comedic value than cultural. Watch the very funny and insightful Daily Show segment here:

Doreen Costa, the last elected member of the tea party standing in the Rhode Island, was even featured in the Daily Show segment. Stewart pulls a clip of a Fox News personality asking Costa if they are “nuts” for thinking there is a war on Christmas.
Stewart’s response: “As a general rule, if you are trying to tell if you and one other person are nuts, ask a third person. Preferably someone from outside the asylum.”
Stewart’s talent is offering up social truisms in the form of jokes. Such as:
Yes you are fucking nuts. Because for whatever annoying, local ticky-tack Christmas-abolishing story you and your merry band of persecution-seeking researches can scour the wires to turn up the rest of can’t swing a dead elf without knocking over a inflatable snow globe or a giant blinking candy cane.
For God’s sakes, Fox News itself is located in midtown Manhattan, the epicenter of all that is godless, secular, gay, jewy and hell-bound and, yet, even here, all around your studio, it looks like Santa’s balls exploded.
He goes on to enumerate just a few of the ways in which Christmas completely dominates the month of December in our society.
Even at the Rhode Island State House there are no fewer than 12 manger scenes on display, I was told yesterday by someone who works there (I’ll try to get some pictures of them all later today). But one tree doesn’t contain the word Christmas and the religious right declares war.
That is a joke.

Which Side of the Tent Should You Be On?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

I have been thinking about the RI GOP situation for a while. I’m one of those people who agree that it would probably be better if the Republicans were a stronger party, that they could actually threaten the Democratic agenda in the state, etc., etc. A problem, I think, is that there are plenty of people who feel this way, but simply would never vote for a Republican. And they’re not wrong to do that (despite what Republicans might say). A great number of Rhode Island voters legitimately dislike Republican policies. Believing in multiparty democracy won’t change that.

Combined with this are perpetual complaints that Rhode Island voters are too unthinkingly partisan, pulling the master lever (metaphorically) the moment they see “Democratic Party”. We also have John Loughlin pointing out that Democrats like Arthur Corvese would be Republicans in any other state; essentially saying they can’t overcome Democratic inertia in the state. Likewise, there are plenty of Democratic voters who point out that Democratic success in RI has led to more than a few Democrats-In-Name-Only. I’m sure the accused Democrats would beg to differ.

Anyhow, if the RI GOP legitimately believes this is the case, I have a proposal for the Republicans: disband and become Democrats.

By adhering to this philosophy of entryism, Republicans would achieve all of their current aims. They would gain more power by being able to ally with conservative Democrats. They would gain the ability to check Democratic policy. They would functionally remove the master lever as a political evil. Essentially, they’d make the Democratic Party a nonpartisan political party. Yes, the primary would become the election, but it pretty much has been anyway, with the battle between the left and right wings of the Democratic Party.

Who knows, they might actually get one of their own made Speaker or Senate President.

Here’s the issue at heart: do Republicans care more about their party or more about their ideals? If they care more about their party, they’ll remain Republicans, essentially declaring tribal identity superior to principles. If they care more about their principles, they’ll do what it takes to win. They’ve tried the separate party thing, and it failed.

Liberals learned the same lesson in 2000. Since that point, liberals and progressives have eschewed third party politics in favor of primary battles for control of the Democratic Party. RI Republicans could use the same tactic.

Another way to look at this is as the “Andrew Jackson” strategy. RI Republicans could be described as ascribing to a “Rhody Reagan” strategy, in which a true conservative arrives to lead them to glory. But a Jackson strategy, forcing a split within the single dominant party based on ideology might be more successful; much as Andrew Jackson did with the Democratic-Republican Party, leading to the formation of the Democratic and Whig Parties.

At the end of the day, it’s about where you’d rather be in the political world: inside the tent pissing out, or outside the tent getting pissed on.