NOM’s RI Senate Push Poll


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

This afternoon, at least one residence in Portsmouth received a robo poll that identified itself as being from Chris Plante and the National Organization for Marriage. With the recent vote in the RI House, the message began, the focus has “shifted to the Senate, where it’s on a knife’s edge.”

Then came the poll: “Do you believe marriage should be between a man and a woman?” The system was unable to process the answer that this reporter provided, and the call terminated, with the usual disclaimer that this was not paid for by any candidate, etc.

This was the second time they called. Back on January 11, they asked the same “man and a woman” question, and that time, I made it through the screen and they asked for gender, and posed an oddly specific question: “Are you over 50?” That time, the phone number identified itself as 401 228 7602 but Caller ID showed it coming from 202 810 1454.

Everyone in *this* house supports full marriage equality, so they must be working off lists from when my parents owned the house.

Marijuana Advocates Predict RI May Legalize


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The Marijuana Policy Project says Rhode Island is likely to be among the next wave of states to legalize marijuana as Colorado and Washington have already done, reports The Nation today.

“The Marijuana Policy Project (MPP) tells The Nation that  the next round of marijuana legalization measures is most likely to come from Alaska, Maine, Oregon, California, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Nevada,” according to the country’s oldest progressive publication.

“With drug law reform, it’s the states that move federal policy,” said Paul Armentano, deputy director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML). “There’s going to continue to be increased efforts at the state level to bring about additional reforms—legislative in 2013, or possible citizen initiatives in 2014 or 2016.”

To that end, the Students for a Sensible Drug Policy are asking Rhode Islanders to sign this petition calling on the General Assembly “take the lead on marijuana legislation.”

RIers, Church Council Support Marriage Equality


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Reverend Don Anderson

A new poll released today shows that Rhode Islanders overwhelmingly support marriage equality with almost 60 percent of the state in favor of same sex marriage.

“…voters in the state strongly support legalizing gay marriage- 57% support it to 36% who are opposed,” according to a summary of the poll results. “When we polled the state on this issue in February 2011 there was 50/41 support for it, and the 12 point increase in the margin in favor of same sex marriage reflects the national movement on this issue over the last few years.”

Said Ray Sullivan, campaign director for Rhode Islanders United for Marriage, of the positive new poll numbers:

“The poll released today by Public Policy Polling finding 57 percent of Rhode Islanders want to extend the unique protection and recognition of marriage to all Ocean State families mirrors the strong support our grassroots campaign has been hearing for months now. Support for marriage equality is strong and growing every day, as we tell the stories of our friends and neighbors who are unfairly unable to access the rights and benefits marriage bestows. Our broad coalition of organizations supporting equality looks forward to continuing to tell those stories and fight for all Rhode Island families.”

However … the other news of the day on marriage equality is that the conservative scare tactic is true: Rhode Island’s marriage laws are affecting some religion’s ability to practice how they want to. It’s just true in the opposite way they want you to believe it’s true. Rev. Don Anderson, executive director of the Rhode Island State Council of Churches explains.

“While there is broad diversity within communities of faith on this issue, many traditions choose to welcome same-sex relationships to the covenant of marriage,” he said in a statement released today. “Under current law, those open and affirming traditions are unable to do so in Rhode Island. While No church or clergy would be required by this law to contradict the teachings of their particular faith, the State Council of Churches believes those congregations who wish to perform same-sex marriages should be able to do so. We believe this is an issue of tolerance and religious liberty.”

The state Council of Churches implored the General Assembly to get on board with the rest of the state and support same sex marriage. The House passed the bill last week (watch the video here) and Gov Chafee is eager to sign it into law. Public opinion polls show Rhode Islanders overwhelmingly support marriage equality. And the Providence Journal reported yesterday that even the socially conservative state Senate would be a close vote. Meaning, the fate of marriage equality in Rhode Island rests squarely on the shoulders of Senate President Teresa Paiva Weed.

Supporters are hoping she will be swayed by the more than 300 churches represented by the state Council who feel that is “an issue social justice, civil rights and conscience,” according to the press release.

“Their endorsement is an important recognition that many Rhode Island faith traditions welcome and affirm same-sex marriages,” said Sullivan.

Things To Do At The State House, Early 2013 Edition


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Pass Marriage Equality

Ok, so Marriage Equality is a half step away from becoming law. The General Assembly has gotten things rolling quickly for a change.

But Marriage Equality isn’t enough.

America’s Best Public Schools

On her FaceBook Page, Commissioner Deborah Gist posted a picture bragging—or promising—”Welcome to Rhode Island Home of America’s Best Public School.”

This was my response:

The best public schools in America are not about having students who do well on tests… The best schools are ones that allow teachers to teach with creativity, that allow students to learn at their own pace. They push students to go beyond where they are comfortable. The best schools may have the best facilities, where the roof doesn’t leak and the heat works, but that’s not the point. The point is that in the classroom, young people are listening, talking, excited, working, writing, creating and asking questions. And the question isn’t, “Is this going to be on the test?” The best schools in America don’t prepare students for the jobs of today, they prepare them for the work that has yet to be invented, which is to say they trust the teachers to teach the students how to learn. No teacher can force a student to learn or perform on a test, but every teacher can nudge the student along. The best schools in the country aren’t worried and fearful about being “left behind”. Can Rhode Island have the best schools in the country? Yes. Are these the policies that will take us there? I don’t know.

My opinion on what would work?

  • Use tests to help students, not evaluate teachers
  • Make superintendents and commissioners accountable for the results of their districts. There is a 3 year revolving door policy on district superintendents. Every three years someone new is put in charge, with a raft of new policies (same as the old, but different). Two and a half years later, they are ready to move to the next district where they can tout the progress they’ve made and blame the administration they’ve left of the mistakes that remain.
  • Allow principals to quarantine poor-performing teachers. They do exist, and they wreck learning for students today. Perhaps make them do duty as administrators.
  • Allow principals to reward the best teachers. There are so many of you out there. Keep it up.
  • Eliminate the fear factor in our schools. High testing is used to dominate, manipulate and control teachers. Teachers pass this fear to their students. How many of you fondly remember testing? What did you learn from those tests? Every few weeks I get a robocall from the school system saying, “Testing tomorrow is important. Make sure your child is on time and gets a good night sleep.”
  • Permit, but do not require, every school to have accelerated and remedial tracks. Our children are not being challenged to reach beyond “Grade Level Expectations.” Those who need help must get it. Those who need nudging must be inspired.
  • Restore arts, sports, theater and everything that makes school fun. Science and Math are great. Where are the science fairs? English is important. What about school plays? Rather than buying computers for schools, teach the students how to build them.

Reform Payday Lending

I’ve said this before. 260% interest on short term loans is usury. It is debilitating and addictive.  We’ve made Heroin illegal to buy and sell. It’s time to stop permitting large out of state companies to profit from our state’s poverty.

Either Investigate 38 Studios or Drop it

Looking into the mechanism of what didn’t work with the 38 Studios Disaster won’t help if it’s an internal look at the people who made the mistakes by the people who made the mistakes. It certainly won’t work if they aren’t held liable or accountable.

We know what didn’t work.

  • Back Room Deals
  • Razzle Dazzle by Sports Hero
  • Bet the farm on something unproven
  • Overpay for borrowing (we’re not allowed to pre-paydown the loan)
  • Don’t take responsibility when things fail and blow up
  • Lack of boldness in negotiating with bond holders
  • Assume that a big company from out of state is better than little companies in state
  • Assume that the Government can actually make good decisions about which businesses will work and which won’t
  • Offer tax incentives to the wealthy and big (hello CVS!)

What could work?

  • Tax incentives for businesses that create infrastructure
  • Penalties for businesses that default on their obligations to produce results
  • Stop bribing companies to come to Rhode Island (they’ll just leave when someone gives them a better deal)
  • Invest in our roads, internet, education
  • Create collaboratives between businesses and schools to produce workers for today’s jobs.
  • Invest in teaching students how to learn and master new skills — not just perform on the test (Yes, I know I’m repeating myself. This is key.)

Reform Election Finances

I spent $12,000 on my election. My opponent spent ten times that. Both figures are, in my opinion, too much for a job that would have paid me $14,500. Our state legislators are probably the worst paid employees in the government. I don’t blame them for hanging onto their “free” health care.

Here are a few suggestions…

  • No campaign contributions during the legislative session. (Thanks John Lombardi and Spenser Dickinson)
  • Eliminate the Master Lever (Thanks Ken Block). If you can’t get someone to mark your name, then you don’t deserve their vote.
  • Make casting a ballot mandatory and fine the folk who don’t vote. Use this funding to publicly finance elections. This is the system that works in Australia. We ought to try it here. (Note: Special exemptions for weird scenarios like Central Falls’ 300 elections this year.)

Got it? Now go!

Nesi Takes On Tax Policy!


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Chart courtesy of WhoPays.org

To my way of thinking, there are few things that would be better medicine for the debate on how to fix Rhode Island’s economy than for WPRI’s uber-influential blogger Ted Nesi to delve into the state’s tax policy in the same way he did for the pension debate.

And lately, he has!

Note the the last three headlines on Nesi’s Notes (as well as a number of posts on tax equity last week and the week before):

While all of Nesi’s posts haven’t furthered the liberal legislative agenda, that really isn’t what progressives want from the mainstream media; we want to have an intellectually honest and respectful debate about the issues that affect the community – be they tax policy, civil rights or social justice.

Nesi has a tough beat  because he has to cover politics AND the economy – and these two forces of nature often collide in odd ways. But if he devotes a fraction of the pixels to tax policy that he gave to pension reform (or even just Raimondomania!), progressives, and everyone else, will get a great deal of very valuable information by which to measure the success and/or failure of our tax policies, which I think people of all political stripes can agree is of tantamount importance to the state.

The zeitgeist here in the Ocean State is that Keynsian economics doesn’t exist. That’s what happens when there are very few progressive pundits and a great many conservative pundits posing as economists. Even self-described moderate Ken Block traffics in this talking point.

A little bit of sunlight from the mainstream media will go a long way to dispelling some of these myths.

Students Call On Chafee To Stop High Stakes Tests


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Photo by Sam Valorose

Public high school students, teachers, and other community members staged a press conference today to protest Rhode Island’s new high-stakes testing graduation requirement, calling on Governor Chafee to end a policy they described as unjust and ineffective.

“We are here today to explain why we believe this graduation requirement will do nothing to improve the quality of our schools or our education,” said Priscilla Rivera, a member of the youth organization the Providence Student Union (PSU) and a junior at Hope High School. “Instead, it will cause real harm to the lives of many students like me.”

Starting with the class of 2014, Rhode Island’s new policy requires students to score at least “partially proficient” on the New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) in order to graduate from high school. Students stressed the widespread implications this policy could have, pointing out that last year, 44 percent of all students across the state did not score high enough on the NECAP to have graduated under the current requirement. Seventy-one percent of black students and 70 percent of Latino students in Rhode Island did not score high enough last year to have graduated, and in Providence, 86 percent of students with disabilities in Individualized Education Programs and 94 percent of students with limited English proficiencies would not have graduated.

“We believe in high expectations,” said Kelvis Hernandez, another PSU member. “We believe that we should graduate with a high-quality education. But this policy is not the right way. Punishing students—particularly those who haven’t had the opportunity to receive the great education we deserve—is neither effective nor just. It is ineffective because we have spent 10, 11, or 12 years in schools that are underfunded, under-resourced, and unable to give us the support we need to do well on the NECAP. And it is unjust because the students who have received this inadequate support are the ones being put on trial.”

Speakers at the press conference also pointed to other harmful effects of high-stakes testing. “Test prep is not what we mean when we say education,” said Dawn Gioello, a family member attending the press conference in support of her niece. “I want my niece to be going to school to learn critical thinking and problem-solving skills, to become a young woman with the confidence and abilities to succeed in college and her career. I don’t want her to go to school to get really good at taking this one test so that she will be able to graduate. I don’t want her whole school experience—her curriculum, her class work, her time after school—to become dedicated to drilling for one exam when she will need so much more than that to achieve her dreams in life.”

“What’s even worse,” added Tamargejae Paris, a junior in high school and a member of PSU, “the NECAP was not designed to be used as a high-stakes test. The makers of the NECAP themselves have said that the test should not be used as a graduation requirement.”

After delivering hundreds of messages to the Governor’s office in opposition to this policy, students called on Governor Chafee to support them. “In just one week, the results of this year’s NECAP test will be released,” said Kelvis Hernandez. “It’s our hope that everyone in Rhode Island passes. But it’s more likely that thousands of students will not score high enough to pass this graduation requirement, particularly among the state’s most vulnerable populations—English Language Learners, students with disabilities, students of color, and low-income students. Will you support this policy that takes away so many of our futures? Or will you join us in calling on the Board of Education—whose members you nominate—to end this discriminatory and misguided graduation requirement? We hope you’ll make the right decision.”

A People’s History: Jan. 31


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Ida May Fuller, of Brattleboro, Vermont, receiving the first ever social security check.

In 1865 … the House of Representatives takes a giant step towards making the United States a nation where “all men are created equal” by ratifying what would become the 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution. It passed 119 to 56 and by December of the next year the state’s ratified it and slavery was officially abolished.

In 1940 … Ida May Fuller, of Brattleboro, Vermont is issued the first ever social security benefits check. It was for $22.50.

Happy birthday, Norman Mailer, born today in 1923 … author, activist, mayoral candidate and one of the godfathers of the New Journalism. Anyone into creative ways to tell a story should read “Armies of the Night” And he’s pretty entertaining when he got a little tipsy before doing the Dick Cavett Show too!

Guy Fawkes “the only man to ever enter Parliament with honest intentions” was hanged and quartered (read: cut into pieces) on this day in 1606 … but he continues to influence British politics

In 1963 … Defense Secretary Robert McNamara says, “The war in Vietnam is going well and will succeed.” …On this day five years later, Day 2 of the “cease-fire” for the Tet Lunar New Year

In 1912 … William Randolph Hearst’s New York Evening Journal first published a full page of comics.

In 1992 … America honors W.E.B. du Bois on a postal stamp … I’m not sure but I’d bet this is the first time the US ever put a card-carrying communist on a government note…

Legendary lefty journalist Molly Ivins passed away today in 2007 … Here’s what the Texas Observer wrote about her at the time: “She remained convinced that Texas needed a progressive, independent voice to call the powerful to account and to stand up for the common folk.”

Catholics Don’t Even Agree With Church Anymore

Bernard Healey is the executive director of the Rhode Island Catholic Conference, the lobbying arm of the Providence Diocese under the direction of Bishop Thomas Tobin. Due to the unparalleled access granted to the church’s representative by some members of our General Assembly, Lobbyist Healey wields political influence incommensurate with the present status of the Catholic Church.

Between 2000 and 2010 the number of Catholics declined by 14% in Rhode Island, making Massachusetts the most Catholic state by default. Meanwhile, Catholics are breaking ranks with the church on all manner of social issues. A recent poll indicated that 49% of Catholics favor marriage equality legislation, of the kind currently being considered by the RI Senate.  A whopping 82% of Catholics believe that birth control is morally acceptable, in direct contravention to their church’s position. Finally, though most Catholics feel that abortion is morally wrong, 62% of Catholics support keeping abortion safe and legal.

Despite the evidence, Healey continues to speak out and advocate for a Catholic position on social issues that few Catholics, and fewer Rhode Islanders find compelling. Worse, despite the fact that Healey commands an ever decreasing following, he continues to be granted special privileges and access to our democratic system.

At the recent marriage equality hearings in the House Judiciary Committee Healey was allowed to speak for over six minutes, three times as long as Governor Chafee. Other religious leaders, leaders of advocacy groups, union organizers and average citizens on both sides of the issue were allowed no more than three minutes to speak and most were limited to two minutes.

Healey is not just a lobbyist at the the State House, he is also a priest, a representative, he would claim, of God’s Church here on Earth. As such he is granted the extraordinary privilege of opening and closing various and official State House functions with prayer, which is Constitutionally suspect, to say the least. This blending of church and state cuts against the very principles upon which Rhode Island and the United States was founded. Yet Healey continues to to be granted what can only be called clerical privilege.

This morning Healey had a letter published in the Providence Journal titled “Sad defense of abortion” which took Neil Corkery to task for his editorial “Roe v. Wade’s ideals are Rhode Island’s” in the January 24th edition. Healey pretends to have just learned from Corkery’s editorial that the man favors keeping abortion safe and legal, this despite the fact that on April 11th of last year both Healey and Corkery testified on as series of abortion bills in front of the House Judiciary Committee.

Corkery testified in his capacity as the head of the RI branch of Catholics for Choice, and Healey as the diocesan lobbyist. In an editorial published on the Rhode Island Catholic website following those hearings, Healey wrote, “The American Civil Liberties Union, Planned Parenthood, the Humanist Society of Rhode Island, Rhode Island Medical Society, Brown Medical Students for Choice and even the erroneously named and highly misleading ‘Catholics for Choice’ all turned out to stop the so-called ‘War on Women’ at last week’s R.I. House Judiciary Committee’s hearing on legislation concerning women and unborn children.” In the same piece Healey referred to those in support of abortion rights, including Corkery, as “radical promoters of death.”

Yet in his letter to the Journal, not only does Healey act surprised at Corkery’s viewpoint, he disingenuously claims that Corkery has “always impressed me as a man of compassion for those so often neglected by our society.” One might wonder how many other radical promoters of death impress Healey as people of compassion?

Healey closes his letter with a familiar refrain, that the Catholic Church has maintained a “consistent and constant defense of the sanctity of all human life.” Consistent is a strong word for a church that has altered its position on abortion no less that eight times.  From 1591 to 1869 the soul was thought to enter the body of the fetus upon “the quickening” the first movements of the fetus in the mother’s womb, or about 16 weeks into the pregnancy. It was Pope Pius IX in 1869 who decided that the soul entered upon conception and Pope Leo XIII in 1878 who prohibited abortion even if done to save a woman’s life. Apparently concern for the sanctity of human life does not apply to women.

A consistent position is one that does not change. Don’t get me wrong, I am not in favor of a consistent position that is immune to change based on better evidence. Consistency is too often a negative, not a positive, but Healey’s position is that the Catholic Church has had a consistent, unchanged, God-inspired view of abortion for millennia, and the evidence does not bear that out.

Healey’s use of falsehoods to advance his political positions threatens to vanquish whatever is left of the scandal-plagued Catholic Church’s so-called moral authority. Healey, quick to quote Theodore Roosevelt, might instead want to heed the words of Thomas Paine who said, “It is better, far better, that we admitted, if it were possible, a thousand devils to roam at large, and to preach publicly the doctrine of devils, if there were any such, than that we permitted one such impostor and monster as Moses, Joshua, Samuel, and the Bible prophets, to come with the pretended word of God in his mouth, and have credit among us. .”

Context Important With Term ‘Openly’ Gay


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Truth be told, I was surprised that my post yesterday on the term “openly” gay caused such a stir. I had honestly thought that one was a long settled issue.

In fact, I remember in 2006 having that debate in the newsroom of the Ashland (Ore.) Daily Tidings and the only one who thought we should refer to a City Council candidate as being “openly” gay was our very “openly” Christian online editor – who also though climate change, 9/11 and the moon landing were all hoaxes.

I was even more surprised at how many people defended it. But as I looked closely at the different examples cited, I realized that context is very important on this one.

Meredyth Whitty, who works in the Legislative Press Bureau at the State House, points out in a comment on the previous post that she sometimes uses the term “openly” gay. But read her comment and you’ll notice the difference in context:

Generally, I agree with you about the use of “openly,” but with an exception: I’ve actually used “openly gay” in some of our press releases about this issue. We say that Speaker Fox is the first openly gay person to hold the top leadership position in either chamber in Rhode Island. We don’t really know that no one else in one of those positions over the course of history was gay. Actually, just based on the percentage of the population that is gay, I’d bet you some were. We just know that no one else spoke publicly about it. So for the sake of accuracy and honesty, openly gay makes sense in that case.

 

Similarly – it was pointed out to me by a number of ProJo defenders – the New York Times even uses the term in this headline. And The Advocate, the New York Times of the gay community, if you will, uses the term openly gay to describe David Cicilline.

But just because there are a certain number of openly gay legislators in America doesn’t mean we should describe any of them individually as being openly gay. One use implies there are lawmakers who have not gone public with their sexual preferences; the other implies there is reason not to.

RI’s Charter First To Codify Religious Freedom


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

A “lively experiment” indeed.

Rhode Island’s colonial charter, which celebrates its 350 anniversary this June, “holds a unique place in the evolution of human rights in the modern world,” says Rhode Island College emeritus professor Dr. Stanley Lemons.

“When King Charles II approved the Charter in July 1663,” Lemons writes, “it marked the first time in modern history that a monarch signed a charter guaranteeing that individuals within a society were free to practice the religion of their choice without any interference from the government.”

Pieter Rods, of the Newport Restoration Society, calls our colonial charter, “the first document anywhere in the history of the English empire that guarantees freedom of religion as a matter of law. Religious freedom and separation of church and state both things that we think of as being very important american values and here they are first set forth in a Rhode Island document.”

Both historians share their thoughts on our world-changing charter as Governor Chafee sets to unveil the state’s plans to honor its birthday today at the State House. Hat tip to Andy Cutler for posting this video to Facebook yesterday.

According to a press release:

The activities to be announced include creating a new exhibit space in the State House, a State House gala, a series of educational events, as well as plans for the conservation and preservation of the Charter. Color guards, colonial militia, and an actor playing the role of Roger Williams will also be on hand for tomorrow’s event.

The press release about the announcement notes the charter is the “source of the phrase ‘lively experiment.'” Chafee uses this phrase often when combating the Christian dogma that often invades modern Rhode Island’s political debate.

The announcement also comes one day after two RI Future correspondents (read them here and here) took issue with a GoLocal piece that said Roger Williams would be a Republican.

Report Confirms Rhode Island Taxes Are Regressive


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Chart courtesy of WhoPays.org

A new report confirms what progressives have saying for several legislative sessions now: Rhode Island needs tax equity.

According to the nonpartisan Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy report the poorest Rhode Islanders will pay more than twice as much in percentage of income than will the richest residents of the Ocean State. Rhode Island has the eighth highest taxes on the poor in the nation, according to the report.

Executive Director of ITEP and an author of the study Michael Gardiner said:

We know that governors nationwide are promising to cut or eliminate taxes, but the question is who’s going to pay for it. There’s a good chance it’s the so-called takers who spend so much on necessities that they pay an effective tax rate of 10 or more percent, due largely to sales and property taxes. In too many states, these are the people being asked to make up the revenues lost to income tax cuts that overwhelmingly benefit the wealthiest taxpayers. Cutting the income tax and relying on sales taxes to make up the lost revenues is the surest way to make an already upside down tax system even more so.

 

The report also lists as one of the most regressive features that the state “Fails to require combined reporting to calculate the corporate income tax.” Gov. Chafee’s proposed budget last year suggested implementing combined reporting but the legislature decided to study the issue instead.

Read the entire report here. Or read the Kathy Gregg’s front page ProJo here and Ted Nesi’s blog post here. Nesi and Gregg are Rhode Island’s two most influential journalists, and influential progressives often complain that both have editorial biases against liberal economic policies.

This report forces both writers to acknowledge Rhode Island’s very regressive tax structure, which is something progressives feel is often ignored by the local media even though it is very popular in both the General Assembly – where almost half of the legislature co-signed a tax equity bill last session – and among Rhode Islanders in general – a Fleming poll last year showed almost 70 percent favored a less regressive income tax structure.

This alone will be regarded as a small victory for progressive Rhode Islanders who feel that the mainstream media turns a blind eye to Keynsian economics.

But the Providence Journal’s story goes one step farther, implying in the very first sentence that the report could affect the politics of tax equity at the State House. “As the tax debate begins anew on Smith Hill, a new study has identified Rhode Island as one of 10 states with the highest taxes on the poor,” writes Gregg, who is widely regarded as the most astute handicapper of local politics.

The ProJo story quoted Kate Brewster of the Economic Progress Institute to illustrate how the new report could tip the scales toward tax equity this legislative session.

Kate Brewster, executive director of The Economic Progress Institute in Rhode Island, viewed the report as ammunition for the campaign by organized labor and others to persuade state lawmakers to ask the wealthy to “pay a little more” by creating a new tax bracket. Advocates are drafting a bill that would raise the top rate from 5.99 percent to 7.9 percent on those whose household income tops $250,000.

“This report provides clear evidence that our tax structure is very regressive and policies are needed to improve fairness for the state’s low- and modest-income taxpayers,” Brewster said of the study titled “Who Pays?”

Brewster acknowledged that the sales tax hits the poor more heavily than any of the other taxes do, but she voiced hope lawmakers would look at the “combined impact of all state and local taxes.”

“If you look at the overall impact, it appears there is more room to ask upper-income households to pay more, through the personal income tax,” and to help the poor by increasing the size of the refund available through the state’s earned-income tax credit, she said Tuesday.

Providence Is Recovering


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Providence Mayor Angel Taveras delivering his 2012 State of the City address. (Photo by Bob Plain)

Governor, Mr. President, honorable members of the Providence City Council, distinguished guests, and my fellow residents of our great Capital City –

One year ago I stood before you in this Chamber with an urgent message for our City and the entire State of Rhode Island. Providence was in peril. Despite many difficult decisions and painful sacrifices made to pull Providence back from the brink, we were still $22 million short of closing a $110 million structural deficit.

Crucial steps necessary to navigate our City safely through our Category 5 fiscal hurricane had not yet come to pass. We still needed to reform our unsustainable pensions. And we needed Providence’s large, tax-exempt institutions to contribute more.

As I stood before you on February 13, 2012, Providence was running out of cash, and running out of time. In the months that followed, there were some who said Providence could not avoid filing for bankruptcy.

BACK FROM THE BRINK

Today it is my privilege to deliver a much more hopeful report on the State of our City: Providence is recovering.

Through collaborative efforts and shared sacrifice, we have all but eliminated our City’s $110 million structural deficit, and we expect to end this year with a balanced budget. Working together, we have accomplished what few believed possible.

We were determined to address the root causes of Providence’s fiscal emergency and prepared to act unilaterally if necessary. And we knew our City would never achieve a lasting recovery without addressing our unsustainable and spiraling pension costs.

In April, following months of actuarial analysis and public testimony, this City Council unanimously approved a pension reform ordinance that put Providence’s pension system on a sustainable path.

We recognized that passing the ordinance would likely lead to a high-stakes lawsuit with no real winners – because a decision in favor of the status quo would push our City over the brink. However, faced with the challenge of negotiating pension changes with more than 2,000 retirees who were not represented by a single entity, we saw no alternative.

Fortunately, Superior Court Judge Sarah Taft-Carter ordered all parties into mediation, and an unlikely path to pension reform presented itself. Negotiations continued with our unions and our retirees, as we all committed to addressing Providence’s challenges collaboratively and in a way that pulls us together instead of tearing us apart.

Last month, Providence’s police officers – who serve and protect our City every single day and have not had a raise in six years – joined with Providence’s firefighters and retirees in agreeing to a landmark reform of our City’s pension system.

The agreement caps pensions, eliminates 5 and 6% compounded COLAs that were strangling our system, suspends all other cost of living raises and moves retirees over 65 into Medicare. It saves our pension system from eventual, inevitable insolvency, and reduces Providence’s unfunded liability by an estimated $200 million.

We owe deep thanks to our City workers from Laborers Local 1033, who were the first to agree to contract concessions to help our City, and then stepped up again to negotiate on pension reform. Thank you to Donald Iannazzi, Ron Coia, Vicki Virgilio and Local 1033.

Thank you to Providence’s firefighters and to Paul Doughty, Phil Fiore and Local 799. Thank you to the
Providence Police, and to Taft Manzotti, Clarence Gough and FOP Lodge 3. Thank you to Providence’s teachers and to Steve Smith and the Providence Teachers Union.

We extend a very special thank you to our retirees, who served our City honorably and have been called upon to accept pension changes in their golden years to help save our City. And let us not forget Providence’s homeowners and business owners for the sacrifices they have made.

I say it again. Providence is recovering.

Following our dire warnings a year ago that we would fall into the dark hole of insolvency without help from every stakeholder in our City, all of our major tax-exempt institutions joined us in pulling Providence back from the brink.

In a demonstration of leadership for which I will be forever grateful, Johnson & Wales University was the first to heed our call – committing to at least triple their contribution to Providence.

Brown University, a world-renowned institution and an engine of our City’s economy, stepped forward with a commitment of $31.5 million over 11 years.

The Rhode Island School of Design, recently named the best design school in the world, committed to more than double its annual contribution to our City.

And Providence College agreed to contribute an additional $3.84 million in the coming decade.

For the first time in Providence’s history, our three major health care institutions – Lifespan, Care New England and CharterCARE – agreed to contribute a combined $1.15 million a year in addition to the millions of dollars in uncompensated care they already provide.

Collectively, Providence’s major tax-exempt institutions have committed more than $48 million in new contributions to our City over the next 11 years.

Thank you to Johnson & Wales, Brown, RISD, and Providence College. Thank you to Lifespan, Care New England and CharterCARE. On behalf of the residents of Providence and all of Rhode Island, thank you.

The General Assembly was critical in helping the City reach new agreements with our tax-exempt institutions. We owe a debt of gratitude to our legislative leaders, without whom Providence’s recovery would not have been possible. Thank you to House Speaker Gordon Fox, Senate President Teresa Paiva Weed, Majority Leader Dominick Ruggerio, Majority Whip Maryellen Goodwin, Representative John Carnevale and the entire Providence delegation, along with legislators from across Rhode Island for believing in Providence and helping our Capital City.

And thank you, Governor Chafee, for advocating for cities and towns and for your commitment to Providence.

As a City and State we have demonstrated that even when the stakes are at their highest and the path forward is beset with obstacles, reasonable people can get things done when they are committed to working together. There’s nothing we cannot accomplish when we are united.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Today I ask you to keep standing with me as we continue moving Providence forward, from peril to recovery and boldly into a future of new opportunities and the promise of greater prosperity.

We have survived the worst of our fiscal storm, but we must remain vigilant. Just weeks ago, Moody’s Investor Service said several years of year-end deficits have left our City “with little room for error in the event of future operating pressures.”

Providence’s reserve funds have been depleted, and we must manage our City’s finances responsibly and transparently, and work to replenish our reserves and restore our credit ratings in the coming months and years.

At the same time, we must act with all urgency to build our City’s economy, improve public education and public safety, and make our City healthier and more sustainable. We must address the devastating impacts of our nation’s foreclosure crisis and the worst economic recession since the Great Depression.

As with the national recovery, Providence’s recovery is slow. But we are headed in the right direction and there are clear signs of hope on the horizon. Though Providence’s unemployment rate is still unacceptably high, today we have the most Providence residents working since 2008. Four years after the burst of the housing bubble, foreclosure filings are finally going down in our City.

Next month, we will release a comprehensive plan to accelerate Providence’s positive momentum. I will have much more to say about economic development at that time, but there are a few strategies I will highlight here.

We must have a focused and coordinated approach to building on our assets. Our City is home to first-class research hospitals and universities and a developing Knowledge District. We have one of the largest industrial deep-water ports in the Northeast. We have one of most vibrant artistic communities in America. Small businesses act as anchors in every neighborhood of our City. Our young and diverse workforce is eager for training and opportunity.

We are already seeing signs of Economic Recovery. Projects representing tens of millions of investment are underway in the heart of our Capital City, including the revival of the historic Arcade – America’s first indoor mall – into a mixed-use development of retail shops and micro-lofts; a project transforming the former Providence Gas buildings into residences; Johnson & Wales University’s construction of a new parking garage and physician assistant building; and the creation of six new retail shops on the ground floor of the Biltmore Garage on Washington Street.

Last Wednesday, I attended events to celebrate the opening of Andy, Jr.’s, an Italian restaurant in the heart of Providence’s historic Federal Hill; Ellie’s, a Parisian-style bakery that recently opened its doors at the Biltmore Garage; Ameriprise Financial’s new offices downtown; Citizens Bank’s grant to help revitalize our City’s Olneyville neighborhood; and a topping-off ceremony for Brown University’s new, state-of-the-art environmental research and teaching facility.

Providence is recovering.

EDUCATION

Plans to grow our economy can never be divorced from efforts to improve our schools, and we are working to provide every child in Providence with a first-class education.

There is much work to be done. Only 46 percent of Providence’s fourth graders were reading on grade level last year. We have set an ambitious goal to have 70 percent of our students reading on grade level at the end of third grade in 2015. The ability to read on grade level is one of the greatest predictors of a
student’s future success. Up to third grade, children are learning to read. After third grade, they are reading to learn.

This fall, we launched Providence Reads – an initiative in partnership with more than a dozen businesses and organizations to increase grade-level reading, promote school readiness, improve school attendance and support summer learning in Providence.

GTECH and Walgreens are the lead sponsors of Providence Reads. Today, 160 volunteers are serving as mentors and helping students learn to read in Providence’s schools. GTECH Senior Vice President Bob Vincent and other representatives from GTECH and Walgreens are here with us this evening. I ask you to please stand for a moment so we can thank you for your commitment to our City and our children.

Tonight, I invite all of you to join us in our effort to ensure that every child in Providence reads proficiently by the end of third grade. Any of you who are interested in becoming a Providence Reads volunteer should please contact the Mayor’s Office.

It takes an entire community to transform public education. We are working closely with the Providence Children and Youth Cabinet, a diverse team of 130 community leaders helping to guide the future of education in our City. In October, the Children and Youth Cabinet released its ‘Educate Providence: Action for Change’ report, which provides baseline data and 11 indicators to measure our progress in educating children from cradle to career.

Our innovative idea to set low-income children on a path toward lifelong achievement by increasing the number of words they hear by their fourth birthday has been selected from more than 300 submissions across the country as a finalist in Bloomberg Philanthropies’ Mayors Challenge. Bloomberg Philanthropies has also awarded our City a grant to launch Leyendo, an initiative to teach reading to students whose first language is not English.

Our public education efforts were also recognized last year with numerous awards and recognitions: the White House Office of Faith Based Initiatives, the National Civic League, America’s Promise Alliance, and the Annie E. Casey Foundation.

We are working to transform Providence into the best urban school district in America.

PUBLIC SAFETY

Public safety is a top priority for me as Mayor. One crime is too much crime, and the job of keeping our City safe never ends. Along with so many other cities across our nation, Providence has experienced far too much gun violence.

Most other categories of crime in our City went down last year or remain among the lowest they’ve been in many years. The Providence metropolitan region is ranked the No. 6 most peaceful area in the country by the Institute for Economics and Peace, using an index that measures homicides, violent crime, incarceration, the number of police and the availability of small arms.

We must credit the Providence Police, who put their lives at risk every day and who serve and protect our City with dedication and professionalism. To help our brave men and women on the frontlines, this year we will use federal funds to conduct a Police Academy and hire a diverse class of up to 18 more officers. We are also conducting a Firefighter Academy and will hire up to 50 new firefighters, which will save the City up to $1 million annually by bringing down overtime costs.

We are working to improve public safety in direct partnership with our City’s residents and community leaders. Since last summer, we have been working with faith leaders to coordinate efforts in ex-offender re-entry programs and explore the creation of a Boston-style Ten Point Coalition in Providence.

We have more than tripled the number of Neighborhood Crime Watch groups in Providence to 15. And I am assisting a fundraising effort to support the Nonviolence Institute’s work to prevent violence and bring peace to our streets.

The availability of summer jobs and recreational activities play an important role in our public safety efforts. Last summer, the Providence Department of Parks and Recreation provided jobs to more than 700 teens in partnership with Workforce Solution and the Rhode Island Department of Labor and Training, and increased its sports and recreation programs across the City. We also worked with Project Night Vision and PASA to help them expand their summer programs.

Finally, I am committed to passing reasonable, common-sense gun control legislation this year that puts Rhode Island in line with our neighboring Massachusetts and Connecticut. I have reached out to every Mayor and municipal leader in Rhode Island to work together on this issue. As the leaders of our state’s cities and towns, we will be most effective if we coordinate our local efforts and speak with one voice at the State House and in Washington, D.C.

CITY SERVICES

One of the most important things the City of Providence can do to help grow our local economy is to deliver the core functions of City government with excellence. Often, City employees – our neighbors, friends and family members – go above and beyond to render extraordinary service. I recently learned of one example that I would like to share with you.

On the Friday before Christmas, Joe Elliott and Bill Newell – inspectors in the Office of Inspections and Standards – learned that an elderly woman in our City was living without heat. Inspecting the property, they found out that the problem wasn’t just a lack of oil or an unpaid gas bill, but that the woman’s home required significant mechanical work that would cost thousands of dollars.

Mr. Elliott and Mr. Newell thought that without some kind of intervention, the City might need to condemn this woman’s house and relocate her in order to prevent her from suffering. So they worked around the clock Friday, and kept working when they were off duty on Saturday and Sunday to make sure this resident’s heating problem was fixed.

They coordinated with National Grid and with contractors who volunteered their time and expertise to have the heating problem fixed at no charge. They weren’t being paid, and they weren’t even asked to do it. They did it because it was the right thing to do for this woman and for our City.

Mr. Elliott and Mr. Newell are here with us tonight, and I’d like to ask them to stand for a moment so we can thank them for their service to our City.

These two gentlemen are not the exception. Our City employees do great work every day, and they are doing more with less. Today, the number of people who work for the City is at its lowest level in more than 10 years.

Good city services matter – along with running an open, accountable and transparent government. A couple of weeks ago, the Open Providence Commission – a panel of city employees, Providence residents and good-government experts chaired by Common Cause Rhode Island Executive Director John Marion – released their report on how our City government can better serve its residents. My administration will work with the City Council to implement their recommendations in the coming months to continue moving Providence forward.

More than a year ago, when we stepped in to save ProCAP from closing its doors due to flagrant mismanagement, I described the agency as an important part of Providence’s human services safety net that deserved to be put on a path to recovery. Today, I’m very gratified that ProCAP has accomplished its reorganization and is once again providing vital services to our community under new management. Thank you, President Solomon, for your commitment to save ProCAP.

HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE

One needs only to drive a few blocks to see the pressing need to address the continuing impacts of the foreclosure crisis in our neighborhoods. Together with the City Council, we have worked to implement new measures to protect our neighborhoods from the blight of abandoned and neglected properties. Using these new tools, our Nuisance Task Force is successfully dealing with properties responsible for creating danger and fear on residential streets that children and hardworking families call home.

There is much work to be done to improve Providence’s roads, and that is why we put a $40 million roads bond on the ballot last year. The roads bond was overwhelmingly approved by voters in November, with 89.5% voting yes. That is a mandate, and we are moving forward to begin repaving more 62 miles of roadway in the coming months and years.

We will continue to remake our infrastructure for the 21st century with Phase III of the Downtown Providence Circulator Project, which will install decorative street lights and restore two-way travel to more streets, improving travel in the heart of our City.

And we worked in 2012 with Governor Chafee and our Congressional delegation to bring cargo cranes to the Port of Providence. That infrastructure investment will be a vital piece of the puzzle as we work to turn Providence’s working waterfront into a hub of our state’s economy. Providence is recovering.

HEALTHY, SUSTAINABLE CITY

Together with our environmental community, we are taking bold steps to transform Providence into one of the greenest cities in the nation. The “Big Green Can” recycling program that we launched in the fall has already dramatically increased Providence’s recycling rate from 15% to 25% – a 67% improvement. As a result, we expect to save $250,000 this year.

This spring, our Lots of Hope initiative will begin converting vacant lots into urban gardens maintained by residents. We are also moving forward to implement a citywide biking plan and a pilot plan for composting across our City.

And, mark your calendars now, we are working to coordinate what we hope will be the largest volunteer, citywide cleanup that Providence has ever mobilized on Saturday, April 20. Please contact our Office of Sustainability if you would like to participate in our citizens’ effort to give Providence a spring cleaning worthy of Earth Day.

Last month, we won an important court victory against Big Tobacco when a judge ruled against the industry’s attempt to block Providence’s new ordinances that ban the sale of flavored tobacco products and store discounts aimed at children.

Thank you, Council President Solomon, Majority Leader Yurdin and members of this honorable City Council, for championing these ordinances that protect our children from the harmful effects of tobacco and the deceitful tactics of the tobacco industry. Thank you to City Solicitor Jeff Padwa, for your team’s strong legal defense of these important measures. We hope our success inspires other communities to follow our lead and take a stand against Big Tobacco.

Our Office of Healthy Communities is not just protecting children and families from the harmful effects of tobacco. It is also promoting farmers markets across our City and pursuing policy initiatives to make healthy, affordable food available in every neighborhood of Providence. Healthy students make good students, and healthy residents make for a stronger City.

ARTS AND CULTURE

We are successfully attracting large conventions and events to Providence such as X-Factor, Netroots Nation, Alpha Kappa Alpha, and the Dunkin’ Donuts AHL All-Star Classic that brought thousands of visitors into downtown Providence this weekend. Last summer, Providence’s hotel occupancy rate reached its highest level since 2004.

At the same time, the economic activity generated by our thriving arts and culture community is having a big impact on our economy. WaterFire has established Providence as a global city, and in September I was excited to join with WaterFire’s creator Barnaby Evans in bringing our signature event to Rome for the first large-scale lighting in Europe.

In the coming year, we will work with our partners at the Providence Warwick Convention & Visitors Bureau to promote our wonderful museums, restaurants, theaters and zoo. We will do a better job marketing our signature brands like WaterFire and the excellent First Works Festival that transformed Kennedy Plaza in September into an artistic and musical party the likes of which we have not experienced before in our City.

Thank you Senator Whitehouse and the rest of our Congressional delegation for securing the National Endowment for the Arts ‘Our Town’ grant that funded the FirstWorks festival. This grant is also supporting a planning effort to reconfigure Greater Kennedy Plaza – it is an exciting project that you will hear more about in the coming months.

Just last week, Rocco Landesman – who recently retired as the NEA’s chairman – wrote that “some of the most rewarding places I visited during my term were places that are very engaged in the arts, that have a great arts infrastructure and commitment to the arts. Providence, Rhode Island, would probably be at the top of the list.”

Our city has so much to offer and it is the reason that creative, entrepreneurial and visionary people see the promise in Providence.

PROVIDENCE’S RECOVERY

Almost two years ago, in my May 2011 budget address, I expressed my belief that together we would make history, saying: “As we move forward, let it be said of us that we came together and rose to the occasion. Let it be said that we set aside politics for the greater good. Let it be written that while others went into receivership, we solved our problems. Let it be written that while some looked to Providence’s fiscal crisis and saw nothing but darkness and foreboding, we seized this opportunity to show that hard work and shared sacrifice brought about Providence’s finest hour.”

Governor, Mr. President, honorable members of the City Council, distinguished guests, and my fellow residents of our great Capital City – we have made history. And the nation is taking notice.

The pension protection ordinance that this Council approved has been cited by the Wall Street Journal. Moody’s called our pension reform agreement, “a precedent other struggling Rhode Island cities and towns can follow.” And Governing magazine recently wrote that Providence “has become a leader among the many state and local governments that have acted recently to make their retirement systems more sustainable.”

Make no mistake; we expect to face challenges in the months ahead. But every day, I am reminded that Providence is truly the beating heart of our state.

Despite the crisis that has battered our Capital City these past two years, our colleges and universities continue to attract talented and entrepreneurial people from every corner of the world. The caliber of our restaurants, theaters and hotels has earned Providence a national reputation as the Creative Capital.

The state of our City is getting stronger. Providence is recovering.

Tonight, I ask you to envision a Providence in which jobs are plentiful on a path of grassy land leading through the heart of our City where a highway once stood; a City where crime is low, our schools teach with excellence and our diverse neighborhoods share an exceptionally high quality of life; a City known across our nation for its strong infrastructure and efficient public transit, its network of urban farms and its commitment to sustainable and healthy living.

We have laid the foundation to make this a reality. The promise of a new era of vitality and prosperity in our Capital City is within our reach.

On behalf of everyone who has worked so hard and sacrificed so much for the City we love, it is my pleasure to extend a heartfelt invitation to our neighbors throughout Rhode Island and across New England and our nation –

We invite you to be part of Providence’s comeback story.

Protest Cuts to Rental Assistance Program Today


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Rental Property
Rental Property
(image via NYTimes Examiner)

Goveror Chafee gets more guff today because of his reluctance to help the most struggling Rhode Islanders as housing advocates rally at the State House today, 3pm, to call for more funding to a rental assistance program.

“Because of State cuts to Rhode Island Housing Authority, tenants in seven apartment complexes in Providence, Central Falls and Woonsocket are in jeopardy of losing their subsidized apartments,” according to a press release from the Committee to Save Tenant Housing. “The Governor and other politicians campaigned this year on the Plan to End Homelessness Platform.  Yet, 234 households are being affected by this cut back and could potentially end up homeless.”

Chafee has drawn considerable ire of those who advocate for the most at-risk Rhode Islanders.

Two weeks ago the RI Coalition for the Homeless was highly critical of the governor because his proposed budget didn’t include any additional funding to end homelessness in RI.

“The Governor is turning a deaf ear and a blind eye to the needs of the most vulnerable Rhode Islanders,” said Jim Ryczek, executive direcotrt of the Rhode Island Coaltion for the Homeless.”He had the power to do something to alleviate the homeless crisis, to help those Rhode Islanders experiencing homelessness, and instead, he chose to do nothing. I don’t know how he sleeps at night knowing that while he sleeps in comfort there are hundreds of Rhode Islanders who have no place to call home.”

ProJo Should Stop Using ‘Openly’ Gay


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Cheers to both the Providence Journal and Fall River Herald News editorial boards, both of whom reaffirmed their support for marriage equality in Rhode Island and called for swift passage of this long-overdue equal rights legislation before it becomes part of the political horse-trading on Smith Hill in the springtime.

This is an important point. Soon enough Rhode Island will learn whether Senate President Teresa Paiva Weed’s opposition to same sex marriage runs stronger than her desire for continued political power. I don’t imagine it does. Not when you factor in that she alone will bear the biggest political crosses, if you will, if Rhode Island rejects marriage equality.

While she is certainly seeking something in return for her support – it could be something giant like control of the powerful Joint Committee on Legislative Services or something smaller like support for binding arbitration – she also risks going down in the books as the Rhode Island’s 21st century version of George Wallace, the Alabama governor, known as “the most influential loser” who fought against civil rights in the early 60’s. Such a legacy would certainly affect her ability to become a judge in the future.

Openly? gay

There’s another point about these two editorials that’s worth noting – this one a difference in them.

The ProJo refers to House Speaker Gordon Fox as being “openly gay” while the Herald News more simply points out that Fox is gay. I think it’s prejudicial to refer to someone as being “openly” gay. There’s a great Wikipedia page on this for those who want to explore this more. For our purposes, I’ll keep it local:

Gordon Fox is no more (or less) openly gay than Ed Achorn is openly heterosexual. They are both – to my limited knowledge – in loving, long-time, committed relationships with two primary differences: one is gender and the other involves equal protection under the law.

When the media refers to gay people as being “openly” gay it implies there is still some cause to be closed about such sexual identity. There isn’t. Not here in mainstream Rhode Island there isn’t.

There are surely some hate groups, churches and other such outliers who still think it’s noteworthy that someone doesn’t hide their affection for people of the same gender. But by and large this ceased being a big deal to most people a long time ago.

We’re just waiting for the law to catch up with rest of society…

Roger Williams Would Be… Roger Williams


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Roger Williams and the Narragansetts
Roger Williams and the Narragansetts
Roger Williams and the Narragansetts, as published in 1856, 170+ years after Williams’ death. (Via Wikimedia Commons)

The political opinions collected at GoLocalProv have always been a bit of a mystery to me. A lot of it doesn’t seem to reflect the city that I know, which is a pretty nice cosmopolitan city with a number of issues.

Don Roach, a Brown University grad, fine. Travis Rowley always seems to inhabit a different Rhode Island than the one the rest of us are living in (his version of this state makes me afraid for his blood pressure), but at least he’s here in Rhode Island. But this takes the cake for about the worst thing that I’ve seen published in GoLocalProv’s political opinions.

It’s a ridiculous screed about the supposed ruin of Rhode Island by the Democratic Party entitled “Roger Williams Would Be a Republican in RI”, written by a Californian. Totally “local” right? There’s even a point where he vaguely compares the Democrats to witches. He does know Roger Williams wasn’t dissenting from witches, right?

Roger Williams (and Anne Hutchinson) features for all of eleven sentences before the screed just repeats the same b.s. about Democrats; they’re corrupt, they’re destroying Rhode Island, etc., etc. My favorite line:

Instead of casting hexes on the unsuspecting citizens, the Democratic Party cult has cursed the minds and the hearts of the Rhode Island citizenry, convincing them that Republicans have no power, no solutions, and no ideas beyond running against the Democratic machine.

Anyhow, the account is factually wrong on at least a couple of points:

1. Rhode Island is the most impoverished state in the nation. No, it’s not. Mississippi continues to retain that honor, with other southern states. Most impoverished in New England; but that’s a bit like being a short giant. Short, for a giant, but still very much a giant. That we’re tied with Nevada for highest unemployment, however, that remains true. We also rank around 17th for highest average income as of 2011.

2. Anne Hutchinson was going to be executed for witchcraft. Anne Hutchinson was advocating doctrines heretical to the Church in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, but witchcraft doesn’t seem to have been among her crimes. The major issue seems to have been her articulation of antinomianism, hence the name “Antinomian Controversy” for the events surround her trial and not “Hutchinson Witch Trial”. Since Anne Hutchinson was both imprisoned by the Massachusetts Bay Colony and then found guilty in both civil and religious trials if the colony intended to execute her they had the perfect moment: when they sentenced her. Hutchinson was excommunicated and banished. Her supporters suffered similar fates.

They’d already written to Roger Williams, who advised them to purchase land from the Narragansett. That eventually became Portsmouth.

That gets me to the major point; that Roger Williams would have been a Republican today. The answer is: who knows? Roger Williams was a classic English dissenter; he ultimately died without belonging to a church, looking for one that matched the purity of his ideals. He was a man apart. If Roger Williams were alive today his first response would probably be “whoa! How are your houses lit without candles? How are they heated without fire? Why is Providence built entirely from stone?!” Things have changed, Roger. Our entire political system is different from Roger Williams’ day. Who’s to say where he would stand once he figured it out.

Unless you actually are practicing witchcraft, specifically necromancy, you can’t possibly know what a dead person would think of today. People exist in specific historical places and times. Certainly, you can utilize their ideas and words; everyone does. It’s why the New Deal’s patron saint was James Madison even though the post-Constitutional Convention Madison opposed large-scale governmental policies in his own day. It’s why the Tea Party uses Tom Paine even though Paine specifically advocates for things like social welfare (and in the 18th Century as well).

We politicize history because it’s convenient to cast ourselves in the legacy of great people. To place ourselves in a historical context and seek justification for it from history. But Roger Williams can’t legitimize the Republican Party in Rhode Islanders’ eyes, anymore than he can do that for the Democratic Party. If Roger Williams were here today, he would be Roger Williams; a complex dissenter who helped found our state and gave us a body of thought that continues to be debated today. The man didn’t even leave behind an authentic image of himself. If he doesn’t have a face, how could he possibly have an affiliation with a political party that arose over 150 years after his death?

Population Decline and Progressive Witchcraft

Witches drinking tea.
A recent meeting of RIFuture contributors (Bob Plain last on right).

There’s an oft repeated falsehood told in Rhode Island that is repeated enough that those parroting it no longer feel the need to justify the logic of it. This factoid goes something like this, people are leaving the Rhode Island, which proves something is dreadfully wrong (and certainly the fault of Democrats, progressives, unions, fisher cats, whatever).

The latest iteration of this comes from the Arthur Christopher Schaper, “guest mindsetter” at GoLocal, who notes with grave concern that “more people are leaving the state than entering.”

The problem, according the Schaper, is that the Democratic Party like a coven of witches “casting hexes on the unsuspecting citizens” has “cursed the minds and the hearts of the Rhode Island citizenry, convincing them that Republicans have no power, no solutions, and no ideas beyond running against the Democratic machine.”

Yes, that’s right. It’s not Republicans lack of viable ideas. It’s only the appearance of that! Clearly someone has fooled you gullible voters. Lucky for you, smart folks like Mr. Schaper are still around to tell you about it. It’s funny, but it’s also what passes for serious political analysis on Rhode Island’s right.

But what of the idea that we should be concerned that “more people are leaving the state than entering?” This one is a bit more pernicious than the rest of the nonsense in Schaper’s anti-progressive rant because it seems a logical premise:  People gravitate towards “good” places and away from “bad” ones. But just how important an indicator is population growth for prosperity? Turns out, there’s no connection between the two.  Richard Florida of the Martin Prosperity Institute looked for just such an association. What he found was that:

Economists of all stripes agree that rising productivity – fueled by more efficient business practices, more highly skilled and flexible workers, new technology and higher rates of innovation – is the main driver of economic growth.

Productivity and prosperity always go together; prosperity and population not so much… there was no statistical association whatsoever between population growth and productivity growth.

This not only challenges, it definitively disproves, the conventional wisdom that a growing population equals a growing economy. Population growth, in fact, can create a false illusion of prosperity.

Florida explains, that while migration patterns may have mattered in the agricultural and industrial past, what’s import now are those things that matter in the new economy “like education, skills, innovation and creativity.” Unfortunately ideas to promote an environment supportive of those things that matter are among the very things Schaper dismisses out of hand as a focus on “inane and non-pressing matters,” for instance legislation promoting the progressives values of tolerance and equality, which have been positively linked to higher levels of economic growth. That’s not progressive voodoo. It’s simple economic fact.

Competitive Cities Care About Equality
Members of the creative class – the 40 million workers, a third of the American workforce – the scientists and engineers, innovator and entrepreneurs, researchers and academics, architects and designers, artists, entertainers and media types and professionals in business, management, healthcare and law who power economic growth – place a huge premium on diversity. In fact, they use it as a proxy to determine whether a city will provide a welcoming and stimulating environment for them.

Cities that demonstrate such attributes gain a competitive edge, as evidenced by their consistently higher levels of economic growth. As the journalist and demographer Bill Bishop put it, “Where gay households abound, geeks follow.”

I’m hopeful that analysis by economists like Florida will help to convince RI Republicans to abandon their flawed metrics of the past and to begin seriously considering ideas that will make Rhode Island competitive in the future. Hopeful, yes, but in the case of progressive witch hunters like Mr. Schaper, it may take some time.

RI: Not As ‘Blue State’ As It Is ‘Not A Red State’


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

House Minority Leader Brian Newberry had some simple wisdom when the Providence Journal asked him why Democrats do better than Republicans in Rhode Island.

“The answer to that is easy: there’s a lot more Democrats than Republicans,” he was quoted as saying.

Of course this is true. The Journal then went on to surmise that this is because “Rhode Island is often called the bluest of blue states, and numbers from the secretary of state’s office bear that out.”

This, on the other hand, is not true … nor is there any way for Rhode Island voting rolls to bear out a comparison with the rest of the country. Nevertheless, the ProJo goes on to cite the data: “As of Jan. 24, the state had 295,971 registered Democrats and 74,959 registered Republicans. Also in the mix: 1,311 voters aligned with the Moderate Party, and a whopping 358,637 who were undeclared.”

A Gallup study from last year (the ProJo used 2012 election data) actually compared the 50 states and found that seven of them and the District of Columbia all have higher percentages of Democrats and/or those who lean that way. We are tied with Vermont at 47.8 percent.

Where Rhode Island is almost unmatched, on the other hand, is in the low number of Republicans and those leaning that way. Only Hawaii has fewer Republicans than Rhode Island, according to Gallup. Hawaii has 25.4 percent Republicans/lean rights and RI has 27.5 percent.

In other words, it’s not that Rhode Island isn’t the bluest of the blue states, it’s that we are the second least red state. Said yet another way, when compared to other states we’re more anti-Republican than we are pro-Democrat.

No state north of the old Mason Dixon line has higher percentage of Republicans living there than the national average, which is 40%. Conservative ideology just isn’t all that popular around here anymore. We can and should debate why – and I’m more than happy to participate in that debate! – but we should not pretend that Democrats dominate here like no where else in the nation.

In fact, the Gallup data indicates 24.7 percent of Rhode Islanders identify themselves as liberals. That’s almost as many as define themselves as either Republican or leaning that way. This shouldn’t surprise those who follow State House politics closely as there are far more progressive Democrats than any kind of Republican in either chamber.

EPI on Gov’s Budget: Right Problems, Wrong Solutions


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The Economic Progress Institute, Rhode Island’s lone progressive economic think tank, has released a report that is largely critical of Gov. Chafee’s budget proposal.

Like our analyses of Chafee’s speech and proposal, it acknowledges that the governor has identified the right problems, but not the right solutions.

According to the Institute’s report released this morning:

Unfortunately, the proposal fails to make meaningful improvements and investments in programs that address the needs of lower-income Rhode Islanders including housing, child care, and cash assistance for families that fall on hard times.  Furthermore, the budget proposes to reduce the corporate income tax rate which will cause our state to lose millions of dollars in the coming fiscal year and future years.

While many important investments are proposed, there is little in the budget to address the needs of families who are struggling in our state.  With our community partners we will advocate for funding for affordable housing, improving the child care assistance program so that working parents can earn a little more and retain their subsidy and addressing the immediate needs of homeless Rhode Islanders.

You can read the entire report here.

This wasn’t exactly a ringing endorsement of the Governor’s tax policy changes.

The Governor’s proposal to reduce the corporate tax rate, designed to improve the state’s business climate, may be well intentioned, but the state cannot t afford to lose so much revenue when there are so many pressing needs.

We will work with the General Assembly to ensure that any changes to the corporate tax rate are revenue neutral by revising the proposed rate reduction and/or reforming or eliminating other tax expenditures.

A tax expenditure is money the state gives away in revenue in hopes of a greater economic gain.

Protest High-Stakes Testing Wednesday At State House


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Are you fed up with the standardized test-ification of our public schools? Think that high-stakes testing has distorting effects on education? Or do you just believe that it is wrong to punish individuals for larger systemic failures?

If you answered “yes” to any of these question, then be sure to join the Providence Student Union this Wednesday at 4:00pm at the State House for a press conference protesting Rhode Island’s new high-stakes testing graduation requirement!

Rhode Island is currently implementing a new high-stakes testing graduation requirement that requires students, starting with the class of 2014, to get a certain score on the NECAP to receive a diploma (a test, by the way, that was not designed to measure individual achievement). The Providence Student Union believes this policy will do nothing to improve our schools, while doing a great deal of harm to a great many students. 

Last year, 44 percent of students statewide did not score high enough to have graduated, with even higher rates in some of our more vulnerable populations (for example 86 percent of students with disabilities and 94 percent of English Language Learners in Providence did not score high enough last year to have graduated under this policy). In addition to unfairly punishing all of these individual students, we know that policies like these increase teaching to the test, particularly in the districts with the lowest scores–so the schools that most need engaging, creative learning will turn even more to drill-and-kill test prep.

For these reasons and more, members of the Providence Student Union, along with other high school students, teachers, parents, and community members are speaking out. Come add your voice this Wednesday at 4:00pm at the Statehouse!

We will be delivering messages to Governor Chafee, so if you cannot make it Wednesday but still want to make your voice heard on this critical issue, feel free to send us a short message you would like us to deliver to the Governor at: contact@providencestudentunion.org.

Political Spectrums Part II: The Criteria


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Justin Katz was understandably unhappy about my previous post. So in the interest of making him unhappier (joke, Mr. Katz, though probably one that contains the truth) I’ll engage with the criteria that he used to arrange his political chart.

The Left-Right Question

The Left-Right question, in essence, is: To whatever degree authority of people over each other is legitimate, should the guidelines be written into the law, or should they be expressed through the interpersonal forces of voluntary social interactions? Very few people will have pure answers to that question, but one or the other option will ultimately prove to dominate; the culture may apply some pressure through the law, but it ultimately understands the authority to derive from the beliefs of the people who make up the society, not the conclusions of the people who control the government.

 

So this is an interesting way of framing the Left-Right question. As I previously pointed out, the Left-Right question has historically been if power derives from a mandate of the people or the mandate of heaven. That was the debate during the French Revolution which settled it; power derives from the people (even Napoleon didn’t derive his power from the church, relying on the people as the backing of his empire). It took a while for the rest of the world to come around, but mostly today, there’s broad consensus that power is people-derived.

There’s a lot of little social contract issues hiding behind all this. But I think you would be hard-pressed to find someone who believes that authority doesn’t derive from the masses. Hard-core communists would say that power can only derive from the masses, and that the demise of the state is the logical outcome of the self-empowered people. Hard-core anarchists and libertarians wouldn’t be that far off. This is why many political spectrums frame this as to what extent should the state have control, rather than is power derived from the people or from the law; which might be a good parlor question, but is a false dichotomy. The people give power, the law manages that power.

The False Human Perfectibility vs. “Economics” Dichotomy

One of the two axes that define vertical placement is essentially a belief about human nature. Progressives and those on the far right tend to see humankind as able to be made perfect, whether that’s through social engineering (on the Left) or purging and racial purity (on the Right). The apotheosis of this belief is the totalitarian, wherein the dictators or ruling classes find themselves to be so infallible that they ought to be permitted to control every aspect of everybody’s lives. As the spectrum approaches this point, the distinction between government and culture breaks down, because the government is all.

The X marks on the vertical axes are meant to indicate that the spectrum continues on, but that there is some line that can be crossed after which the person will pick one side over the other. In the case of the left-hand line, the upper segment is a belief in the constancy of human nature and fallibility.

This doesn’t mean humanity cannot be improved or changed, but that it’s not possible to perfect it, and that any social system must take that reality into account. Ultimately, this is an underlying assumption of economics, which premises its studies of the causes and effects of human behavior on the principle that the results will be relatively consistent.

 

This is why I said Mr. Katz has an agenda. He’s got two false beliefs: 1) that progressives believe in the perfectibility of humankind and 2) that economics doesn’t support progressive thought. Obviously progressives don’t believe that human beings are perfect (I shouldn’t have to tell you that) but the idea that somehow economics is a purely moderate or conservative pursuit is so patently false that it belies the nature of that social science. Economics is as imperfect as people. We have the financial collapse to prove to us how poorly economics works as a predictor of human behavior. If you ever hear someone say “no economist in the world would believe xxxx” you have my permission to slap them silly, because some economist right now is working to “prove” that’s how things work. Again, it’s clear that Mr. Katz is attempting to put progressives outside of the mainstream by suggesting they don’t believe in economics, and somehow connect with totalitarians on the right.

Mr. Katz seems to suggest that at some point, libertarians and anarchist align around anarchy and that progressives and far-right thinkers align around totalitarianism, regardless of the beliefs that brought them there. First, progressives aren’t equivalent of the far-right unless you think that loving democracy and hating it (respectively) are the same thing. Here’s former Vice-President of the United States Henry Wallace warning of the dangers of American fascism. It’s pretty clear that Wallace, who ran for the presidency under the banner of the Progressive Party, believes the antidote to far-right fascism is democracy.

The other issue is that Mr. Katz seems to think that totalitarian states can align based on a few salient features of their regimes. King Louis XVI was an absolute monarch, a totalitarian as we’d understand it today; who received his mandate to rule from God. He wouldn’t find much in common with Joseph Stalin, who received his mandate to rule explicitly by force, as the vanguard party, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union had the right to ignore the people in favor of preparing them for communism (the end state where the state itself would cease to exist). Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini didn’t lose much love for Stalin; both were focused on building up their people; Hitler initially killed communists and socialists in Germany before moving on to Jews and Slavs; Mussolini was eventually executed by communist rebels. Merely because a regime has similar methods to another doesn’t make them best buds. Just as democracies don’t swoon over each other because they’re all democrats.

The Community vs. The Individual

The other vertical axis concerns one’s emphasizing the individual over the community, or vice versa. Again, the spectrum is ultimately unbroken, but there is a line that can be crossed from libertarian to moderate, on the left, and to conservative, on the right. For instance, I would consider myself to be pretty much on the line that separates right libertarian from conservative, and it would be a matter of some difficulty for me to choose between the individual and the community in a final analysis. (I strike that balance through theology, more on which in a moment.) But I absolutely don’t think communal goods should be wrested from the individual without consent, nor that individualism oughtn’t be argued against when it threatens the society.

 

We’re back again in the social contract. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes couldn’t really agree over this (of course they were speaking at opposite ends of the English Civil War, so I suppose that’s understandable). But I suspect it would be difficult for anyone to choose between the individual and the community. I’ve always argued that we seek a more equal community so as to strengthen the liberty of the individual. My emphasis is on the individual, but the method works on the community. There’s no dividing line for that philosophy, the kind that sees equality and liberty as two sides of the same coin. I fully expect people to criticize that point of view, but it’s the one I hold. So how do you place that?

Look I understand that it’s useful to classify and divide and categorize different political thought and people. But that’s ultimately the problem I see. People are messy. We have at least three separate sciences for understanding why people do things the way they do, and each science has further schools of thought that are wholly at odds with the other schools of thought. Sometimes people take a position merely because the other side is so unpleasant they don’t want to be associated with it. How do you classify personal relations into political theory?

I once read a passage about doing qualitative interviews of people, and the author noted that people are usually unable to explain why they did something. That we seek order and patterns in chaos is a perfectly alright endeavor. But it’s an imperfect endeavor.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387