Arming URI Campus Police: Bullet Points

On April 4, the URI campus was locked down for a couple of hours after, as the Providence Journal states it “people in a lecture hall said they heard someone say they had a gun. Police found no gun or a shooter.”

Today, there was a forum at URI about arming campus police. In his invitation to the event President David Dooley wrote:

Chafee Hall under siege, April 4, 2013

Our desire is to have an informed dialogue about the issue on May 8. Our goal is NOT to attempt to reach consensus, but to assist our community in developing a thorough understanding of the issue and its implications. If additional forums are needed to foster broader dialogue about approaches, strategies, or potential improvements, we will arrange for such meetings.

Does that not sound a little condescending? The timing is a tad unsettling too: this is a time when students are taking finals and faculty are desperately trying to wrap up the semester. Oh, cranky old me, I must be just having a really bad day! However that may be, I attended the forum and made the following points:

  • I am concerned about the preliminary report about an individual who allegedly had a gun in URI’s Chafee Social Science Center on April 4, 2013.
  • Why am I concerned?
    • Here is the essence of the report: police entered Chafee with a five-minute delay caused by the fact that campus police is unarmed and had to wait for armed assistance.
    • To solve this “problem” URI will spend $300,000 per year to arm campus police.
  • I am concerned because the report provides little more than violence- and fear-enhancing recommendations.
  • The report fails to acknowledge that fear on the part of armed police leads to the shooting of unarmed people, often people of color.
  • The report ignores that the UK has an unarmed police force and a fire arm fatality rate that is 40 times lower per capita than in the US.
  • Campus security should be based on nonviolent conflict resolution. Not a dime in the proposal for that approach. Why were the experts of our own Center for Nonviolence & Peace Studies at URI not consulted? [Here is a link to Paul Bueno de Mesquita’s, the center’s director, input for this forum.]
  • Do we really need to spend $300,000 per year just to avoid a five minute delay?  A delay is often good; it allows for a considered response rather than one dictated by panic.
  • I am concerned about the proposed solutions; they are symptomatic of a hysterical, hyper-violent society.
  • I am concerned about solutions that seem to come straight from the Homeland Security Academic Advisory Council of which President Dooley is a member. [What I did not mention at the forum is that Chancellor Linda Katehi was on this very same council when she infamously had Occupy UC Davis students pepper sprayed in the fall of 2011.]
  • This proposal is an agenda looking for an opportunity, all in the spirit of never letting a good crisis go to waste.

More was said at the forum, but not much time was left after two URI administrators had claimed fifteen minutes “developing a thorough understanding of the issue and its implications,” leaving the rest of the hour for Jane and John Campus Public.

Also the Board of Education has been talking about arming campus police. The board had as one of agenda items of today’s meeting: “Establish a Policy Enabling URI, RIC and CCRI to Make Individual Institutional Decisions to Arm Campus Police.”  See also House Bill Number 6005, which is on tomorrow’s agenda of the House Committee on Judiciary.

In defense of my niece Jessica Ahlquist


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Jessica AhlquistMy niece, Jessica Ahlquist, has received dozens of awards for her brave stance in challenging the constitutionality of a Christian prayer affixed to the wall of her Cranston high school. In the wake of winning her case, the outcome of which was never in doubt given the strong, 50 years of legal precedent, she faced death threats and rape threats and abhorrent treatment from the media, her mayor, her state representative, school department officials, teachers, fellow students and complete strangers.

Online, in comments and in news articles, Jessica has been accused of doing it for the money, even though she only asked for damages amounting to five dollars. On the radio, John DePetro and his callers have been particularly nasty, and DePetro does nothing to discourage the trivialization and sexualization of my niece on his show. DePetro’s unhealthy obsession with my niece began with him tweeting her when she was just 16 years old, odd behavior for a man with children her age.

Recently news broke that Jessica will be receiving another award, this one from Playboy Magazine founder Hugh Hefner. This has led to another round of hyperbolic media and accusations that this is all some sort of money grab on her part, even though the award she’s winning did not even exist when she began her case.

But reason was never something Jessica’s critics made use of.

Last year the same award was given to Zack Kopplin, another high school atheist, this time from from Louisiana, who fought against the teaching of Biblically based and oxymoronically entitled “creation science” in his schools. No hue and cry was raised when this young man went to California to receive his award.

But Jessica is an attractive young woman. Critics seem unable to avoid the sexualization of my niece, never mind that she is not even eighteen years old. Callers on John DePetro’s show practically salivate as they create lurid fantasies about my niece visiting the Playboy Mansion to receive the Hugh Hefner First Amendment Award for Education. Their religious repression and inability to articulate sentences with meaning are on full display.

This is all the more ironic considering the fact that even now John DePetro is fighting off accusations that he made inappropriate sexual advances towards an employee. For a man of DePetro’s low character and reputation to call into question the dignity and honor of my niece is a sad stain on Rhode Island media. If DePetro were capable of shame, he would become a cave hermit, permanently removing himself from the sight of his fellow humans. Unfortunately for us all, DePetro continues his endless assault on public decency with my niece as his target.

And let’s be clear about what Jessica did to earn Depetro’s wrath:

She stood up for the Constitution of the United States, the same document public officials swear to uphold and for which our young soldiers die every week in two ongoing foreign wars. Not only did she stand up for what she believed in, but she had the temerity to win her case, with a judge’s decision that was unequivocally in her favor.

Jessica was right.

And for that, to this day, she is the target of those who don’t understand or don’t care that this is a nation that protects religious conviction from government intrusion and protects government from theocratic laws.

Those who attack my niece display the worst excesses and ugliness of religion in America today. They are beneath contempt.

DePetro, Carcieri, Healey in East Greenwich tonight


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

depetroI saw my ideological nemesis and neighbor John DePetro on Main Street here in East Greenwich the other day. “What’s going on, John?” I said to him. To which he replied, “I have nothing to say to you.”

Then he added as he walked away, “I’ll see you in court.”

I’m assuming he means for the sexual harassment suit our former colleague Dee DeQuattro has filed against him, but who knows. Experience tells me the truth is usually the opposite of what John DePetro says it is, so perhaps I won’t see him in court. Though I do know he appeared before the state Human Rights Commission for the allegation recently. So on the other hand, maybe I will see him in court.

Either way, I plan to see him tonight night when he hosts a panel discussion with former governor Don Carcieri, Catholic priest and State House lobbyist Bernard Healey and former GOP state senator and Alix and Ani CEO John Feroci at the Odeum Theater, also on Main Street in East Greenwich.

This is a pretty tight-knit group. The evening is being sponsored by Besos, a new local restaurant. The owners are very good friends with both Feroce and the Carcieri family (in fact, they bought the former governor’s downtown mcmansion from him). All of participants belong to the local Catholic church, where Healey is the priest.

Coincidentally, these conservative Catholics were booked by a liberal Jew. Frank Prosnitz, former ProJo and Providence Business News editor, has been leading the local effort to revitalize the Odeum for years. He’s managed to get the doors open, but with renovation bills now due he’s turned to this conservative cabal to help bring in some revenue. It will certainly be interesting to see what kind of crowd this group attracts.

I don’t know Feroce too well, though I did meet him years ago when I was in college and he was in the state senate. Bernie Healey is best known for lobbying State House leaders against marriage equality. Carcieri used his two terms as governor to advocate against immigrants, equality, poor people and the public sector. Few Republicans have been willing to defend him since he left office and his infamously failed scheme to give his friend Curt Schilling public money to make a video game has rendered him one of the least popular local politicians in recent memory. DePetro is widely regarded as the most mean-spirited and dishonest person in Rhode Island politics and/or media.

Alex and Ani aside, it’d be hard to put together a trio that has done more damage to Rhode Island than Carcieri, DePetro and Healey. I wish the local theater much luck, but this seems like more evidence things aren’t going well for the Odeum.

Patch abandons community journalism business model


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

patchThere’s been a lot of changes at Patch, the network of local news websites, since I left the company two years ago.

Back then, the AOL-owned company was launching new sites nationwide with reckless abandon. It preached the gospel of community journalism and prided itself on outfitting its editors with tools and resources to cover their towns. It was a fun place to work and morale among my co-workers was very high.

Now all that has changed. For the worse.

When I worked there, Patch employed 19 full-time journalists to staff 15 sites in Rhode Island. Each site had a healthy freelance budget and a part-time community editor. Now, there are only 10 full-time journalists working for the 15 local sites; freelance budgets and community editors have been eliminated altogether.

And as of today, Patch’s initial business model of having one editor dedicated to a community is gone too.

Every local editor in Rhode Island is now responsible for multiple sites. This has been happening through attrition for about a year, but Patch in RI is undergoing a big reshuffle this week.

Many local employees have been discussing the changes on social networks, but to my knowledge there has been no formal announcement from the company. Suffice to say, the folksy pictures of local editors at the top of each site now have little to no relationship to the reality of the staffing situation anymore.

Patch invested heavily in Rhode Island when it needed to develop an audience. Now that it is a known commodity, the company is dramatically scaling back. Employees are being given fewer resources and are expected to produce more results. Many openly complain about their jobs and their community on Facebook. Sales staff is gaining influence over editorial decisions.

This isn’t the model for community journalism, this is the model for corporate journalism.

House Finance will hear tax equity bills today


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

tax rate v unemploymentThe powerful House Finance Committee will hear two bills on income tax equity today. One sponsored by Rep. Maria Cimini of Providence would raise income taxes on the richest Rhode Islanders by 2 percent and would mean $60 million for the state. The other, sponsored by Rep. Larry Valencia, who represents Exeter, Hopkinton and Richmond, would raises income taxes on the rich by 4 percent.

Both bills are targeted to reverse income tax cuts for those who make more than $200,000 a year, or families that make more than $250,000. Legislative leaders, specifically House Speaker Gordon Fox, and former Governor Don Carcieri sold these tax cuts to the public on the basis that they would help improve Rhode Island’s economy. The state economy got worse with each subsequent tax cut.

Here’s Valencia explaining the difference between the two bills being heard today: