Immigration reform won’t draw Latinos to GOP


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

legalize-my-momSenator Lindsey Graham recently said that without immigration reform the Republican Party would be in a “demographic death spiral.” Unfortunately for the Republican Party, even if the House of Representatives manages to pass a similar immigration bill as the Senate did, Republicans are unlikely to win over Hispanics, particularly young Hispanics who make up the future of the Latino vote and are the largest segment of the voter-eligible Latino population.

Although 55% of Latinos report that immigration is the most important issue facing the Hispanic community, once immigration reform is passed, Latino voters will have to choose their candidates based on other issues and given where they fall on the vast array of social and economic policy issues, Latinos are unlikely to vote for the current Republican lineup anytime soon.

Let’s look at where Latinos stand on the issues. We’ll start with social issues since that is often the place where Republicans claim they will resonate with Latino voters. Indeed, Latinos are more religious than the population at large and are more likely to be members of socially conservative denominations (approximately 68% identify themselves as Roman Catholics and 15% say they are evangelical Protestants). However, even given this fact, the numbers don’t look good for Republicans:

  • 68% of Latinos ages 18-29 support same-sex marriage. In fact, over 50% of all Latinos favor allowing gays and lesbians to marry and 60% of Latinos say that homosexuality should be accepted and not discouraged.
  • Young Latinos are very pro-choice. 53% of those 18-29 say abortion should be legal in all or most cases.

However, Latinos overwhelmingly say that it is not these “moral” issues that they care about. In 2011, 75% of Latinos polled said that politicians should be focusing on economic issues such as jobs, taxes, and the minimum wage. So let’s look at where they stand on the size of government and economic issues. Again, the picture is not good for Republicans.

  • 75% of Latinos say they would rather have a larger government that provides more services than a smaller government with fewer services.
  • 82% say they think the government needs to do more to solve problems. Only 18% think that a smaller government is better.
  • 60% say that the government should ensure that everyone has access to health care (and 60% say Democrats are closer to their position on health care). More to the point, very few Latinos support repealing Obamacare and 73% oppose reducing spending on Medicare.
  • 84% say they want the Environmental Protection Act to do more to limit air pollution and 86% say they support President Obama using executive powers to limit pollution that causes global warming.
  • 77% say they support raising taxes on the wealthy as a way to balance the budget (including over 50% of those Latinos who identify as Republican) and only 8% say they would support a spending cuts only approach.

Although 43% of Latinos say they would be more open to voting for a Republican if “they take a leadership role” in passing immigration reform, only 14% of Latinos say they identify with the Republican Party.  Given where the Latino electorate appears to fall on other salient issues, this number is unlikely to change anytime soon, even if immigration reform manages to get through the political labyrinth of Congress.

Family leave TDI is good for equality and the economy


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

MomsRisingLGA new piece in The Atlantic says the legislature did Rhode Island a strong service when it passed a bill extending TDI to family leave. Rhode Island is only the third state to do so, but we are helping the Us to catch up with the rest of the industrialized world in granting paid leave for new parents; out of 178 countries worldwide only the United States, Swaziland and Papua New Guinea do not.

“Family-friendly policies such as Rhode Island’s new law prompt a broader positive result than their specific legal requirement targets,” writes Nanette Fondas. “Caregivers receive a direct benefit from family leave programs: time off. But all employees reap the indirect benefit of a fairer workplace.”

The whole piece is well worth a read. But perhaps even more interesting is a May post from Forbes.com called: 3 Reasons Why Card-Carrying Capitalists Should Support Paid Family Leave.

“In business school, we were taught that a solid strategy recognizes the exogenous (external) and endogenous (internal) challenges facing your business and addresses them,” writes Cali Williams Yost. “Employee child care and eldercare responsibilities are not only two major external business challenges, but they become internal issues the minute an employee walks in the door or signs onto his or her computer.”

Her three reasons are:

  • Paid family leave acknowledges and addresses a reality that directly impacts every business and, therefore, should be planned for strategically, uniformly and deliberately;
  • Paid family leave is NOT a tax, but income replacement insurance program funded by employees at minimal cost and
  • We are paying for a cost for caregiving already, albeit indirectly and inefficiently.

Fertile Underground co-op backs bicycle efforts


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Click on the image to learn more about Fertile Underground.
Click on the image to learn more about Fertile Underground.

Fertile Underground, the West End’s community grocery cooperative, decided at its General Assembly recently to support two great transportation reform endeavors:  Park(ing) Day and Bike-to-FUG-Sundays.

In cooperation with the Recycle-a-Bike bike valet, Fertile Underground will use two of its front parking spots for temporary bike parking on Sunday mornings in order to encourage families to cycle in.  The store will feature a different discount or special offer for cyclists each week.  Recycle-a-Bike will offer the service for free, but suggests a donation of $1 for the valet attendant to watch each bike.

As we’ve previously pointed out on this blog, bikes take up so much less space than cars, that removing the parking spots in favor of bike parking actually greatly increases the number of people who can shop at the store.

FUG has also become the first business in Providence to make a hard commitment to be part of Park(ing) Day on September 20th.  Park(ing) Day is when businesses temporarily use their parking spaces for something other than parking.  It highlights the huge amount of space used to store cars–an East Providence-sized area in Rhode Island alone, and an area the size of Puerto Rico (or about three Rhode Islands) nationally–and how that space can be used for more creative purposes like public gardens, outdoor seating, sales areas, or bike amenities.  As a temporary model, Park(ing) Day is low-risk, but sometimes the changes are so popular that they get adopted permanently, as in my old neighborhood of West Philly, where the Green Line Cafe instituted outdoor parklets with seating.

I’m really excited that Transport Providence has been able to partner with FUG on both these projects.

This piece is reposted by James Kennedy from his blog TransportProvidence.