Brainwashed to Buy

By now I’m sure everyone has torn open their gifts and are watching television before preparing today’s Christmas meal. And that includes many of my non-Christian friends who now celebrate the holiday. That’s quite a change from when I was a kid and it was a religious holiday, celebrated by Christians in a solemn and respectful way. However, that isn’t the case any more and it bears some investigating.

In the 60’s and 70’s, as a kid gBlack Friday Shoppingrowing up in Providence in a family of modest means, we used to make handmade gifts in woodworking and ceramics classes and exchange them with family members and those close to us. No one ever went into debt for buying everyone something for a holiday that was supposed to be about the birth of Christ.

A couple of generations have passed since then, generations who through no fault of their own grew up bombarded with advertising at almost every turn of their heads. Maybe because not everyone had televisions when I was young, or maybe because we spent more time playing outside, we weren’t exposed to it as much. Now, though, the last generations have grown up in the public relations age and not enough of them were warned about the nature of that business, to influence them to buy, buy, buy.

Radio and print advertising were easy to gloss over, we could change the channel or flip the page, even early TV ads were easy to ignore. But, as the years rolled on, advertisers got more clever and the opportunities arose to hone their skills with television ads, online ads and now ads on smartphones, the succeeding generations got overwhelmed and now by into what advertisers are doing without giving it much thought.

The FCC ruled subliminal advertising illegal in 1974, but think about the aggregate damage the use of non-subliminal advertising has had on our culture. Today, advertisers have the carte blanche right to run just about any ad they want. Corporate America pumps more into advertising their products than it does to produce the goods, thereby pumping up the cost of the product and no one seems to realize the fact.

A marketing student told me just the other day that courses teach students now, just to market to the high-end buyers since the middle class and lower income ranges are already brainwashed into their buying patterns. If this cynical view is being taught in classrooms, imagine the conversations taking place in the marketing departments and board rooms all over America and beyond.

The key is education. When I was a senior at Classical High School, my English teacher, Mr. John Sharkey, took almost two weeks to explain to us the nature of advertising and the need for us to be cynical and critical of every ad we saw since the primary objective was for that ad to separate us from every dollar in our pocket. I have no idea if anyone is still including that lesson in any curriculum, my guess is that since most teachers spend way too much time teaching to a test, that this is one lesson that falls by the wayside.

Our kids need this knowledge. They need to know the difference between the Wamart commercial with paid actors playing associates telling the world what a great place Walmart is to work; and the actual working conditions and bare subsistence level most associates live while Walmart is one of the greatest recipients of corporate welfare. Young men need to know that using Axe spray isn’t going to get them attacked by a group of young women. Young women especially need to know they don’t need to look like fashion models. And everyone should know, they don’t have to go spend money for spending money’s sake just because of the birth of Christ more than 2000 years ago. Christ isn’t getting any of the money spent, it’s all going into corporate coffers.

Merry Xmas, all; and to all a good life!

 

The Christmas Truce, 99 years later


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Christmas Truce Photo
Christmas Truce Photo
Soldiers of the 134 Saxon Regiment (Germany) & the Royal Warwickshire Regiment (UK) on 12/26/1914 (via Wikimedia Commons, Imperial War Museum collection)

In December of 1914, around 100,000 soldiers from Britain and Germany spontaneously left their trenches during World War I and fraternized in no man’s land. They exchanged gifts (such as they had) and sang songs. This event is known as the Christmas Truce. The truces were varied; in some sectors there was still fighting, in others the truce lasted until New Year’s Day. To a lesser extent, there were also truces between the French and Germans elsewhere on the Western Front and the Austrians and the Russians on the Eastern front.

It’s important to emphasize the spontaneous nature of this truce. Despite attempts by Pope Benedict XV, the belligerents of World War I refused to call a temporary cessation of hostilities. While of course the commanding officers opposed the truce, other notable opponents were a young Charles DeGaulle and a young Adolf Hitler. But thousands of rank and file soldiers, acting against orders and in violation of military discipline, chose to recognize their combatants as fellow human beings.

In military lingo, this is “fraternization” a serious problem for fighting a war. Mostly, when we hear that word in our culture, it’s associated with risk of leaking sensitive information, a problem for a military that could lead to lives lost. But the Christmas Truce represents another issue with fraternization: it can lead to lives saved.

That’s a problem when you’re trying to fight a war. “I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country,” George C. Scott as Gen. George Patton tells us in the eponymous film. Fraternization makes it extremely difficult to do the latter; and this was during a war when only about 15 to 20 percent of soldiers fired their guns at enemies in view (it’s a testament to our ability to commit carnage that close to 31 million soldiers were killed or wounded during the four years of the war).

That’s ultimately the problem. The blame for a big disastrous war like World War I definitively falls on the shoulders of the warmongering politicians who rattled sabers and pushed it forward and negotiated the secret alliance system that made it inevitable. But it’s impossible to fight without millions of acts of cooperation from ordinary, everyday soldiers. When that cooperation isn’t there, the war doesn’t happen.

What the Christmas Truce demonstrates is that “peace on earth” is more than just a Christmastime slogan; it’s an actual possibility. And that’s not pie-in-the-sky thinking. We live in perhaps the most peaceful time in all human history. For example, the amount of military casualties in both the Afghan and Iraq wars (a nearly 13-year long period of conflict) are far fewer than the amount of military casualties that were snuffed out in seven days in World War I.

It’s possible because we make it so. We may lament the distancing of the average American from the average soldier, but in many ways, this is a reflection of the peaceable nature that’s now seized hold of us; one where war is a ridiculous way to solve global problems.

Play us out, John McCutcheon: