Huge Win: Gordon Fox Reverses on Voter ID!


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
George Nee and Gordon Fox get reacquainted with each other on election night. (Photo by Bob Plain)
George Nee and Gordon Fox get reacquainted with each other on election night. (Photo by Bob Plain)

Gordon Fox, the conservative Speaker of the Rhode Island House of Representatives, sent shock waves through the Democratic Party when he got a voter ID law passed.  Ignoring a plea from the Chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, Fox created a publicity nightmare for the Democrats and a beloved talking point for the right.  That is why it is so critical that he’s now reversed his position, according to reporting from Ian Donnis of NPR.  This is a huge win for the Rhode Island left!

I want to thank the more than 1,800 concerned citizens who signed our petition to repeal the law.  I want to thank Jim Vincent and the NAACP for their tireless work fighting to restore voting rights.  I want to thank the new Providence DSA chapter, which made repealing voter ID their top priority.  But most of all, I want to thank every member of Fox’s liberal district who called him to ask him to change his position.  When DSA and the Progressive Democrats canvassed Fox’s district to pressure him to change his position, I was overwhelmed by the response we got on the doors.  People really understood the issue, they were furious about it, and they made their voices heard.  This victory belongs to them.

Experienced observers of the state house will note that Fox routinely blocks legislation he publicly supports.  In 2013, although he endorsed an assault weapons ban, he still denied it a vote, effectively killing the extremely popular bill and earning himself some glowing praise from Tea Party Representative Doreen Costa.  (I personally suspect the thousands of dollars he took from the NRA might have had something to do with it.)

During the 2012 election, he promised to introduce a sunset to the voter ID law.  In 2013, not only did he break that promise, but he actually tried to tighten the law even further.  By keeping the amended version of the repeal bill secret until right before the House Judiciary Committee voted on it, Fox tricked the pro-voting members of the committee into voting for a bill that would allow even fewer IDs to be accepted at the polls in 2014.  Fortunately, Representative Larry Valencia, who sponsored the bill, was able to pull it before it reached the floor.

So we will still have a huge fight ahead of us.  But Fox’s reversal means we might just win this battle.

Is Taylor Swift Stealing Public Property? [UPDATED]


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Photo courtesy of WJAR/NBC 10. Click on image for original.
Photo courtesy of WJAR/NBC 10. Click on image for original.

Well, it’s not 2014 yet, but Taylor Swift is already making a bid to be on GoLocalProv’s “14 who made a difference in RI in 2014” list, mainly by making RI a little smaller.

Reporter David Collins of The Day describes the scene around the Nashville country star’s mansion:

Not only is the Swift contractor plucking and moving around big ocean boulders, but they have added a whole new line of rock sea wall on what had previously been a public beach, at a location that appears to be below mean high tide.

Just a note, if it’s below mean high tide, it’s public property in RI, specifically to prevent folks like Swift whose reach might exceed their grasp from grasping up our waters and beaches.

Collins also points out that the wall is permitted only by the RI Coastal Resources Management Commission, not Westerly:

After touring the Swift construction site Friday from the public perimeters, I headed to Town Hall, thinking the permits on file there would better explain what’s going on.

So imagine my surprise when the first person I encountered at the building office said the only work she knew of at the Swift mansion was the installation of a generator.

I then asked to speak with Building Official David Murphy, who acknowledged that he does indeed know of the extensive work going on at the Swift house.

Indeed, when I suggested it must be costing more than a million dollars, he raised his eyebrows and said it is probably costing a lot more than that.

Still, he said, he has decided that no building permit is needed.

That means, of course, that there are no plans for the work on file in the building office. And there will be no building permit sent along to the tax assessor, to trigger a property tax increase.

And no permit fee, assessed at the rate of $7 per thousand spent, was charged.

I don’t know, maybe this is typical Watch Hill behavior. They say good fences make good neighbors, so I imagine a fence made out of boulders will make very good neighbors indeed. Hey, and a fence down below the mean high tide mark, well, that might be even better.

Gawker decided to run with the story in this manner: “Taylor Swift is Fucking Up the Rhode Island Coastline

 

UPDATE: CRMC Says It’s All Okay, Swings on 1982 Court Case