The State of Education, in Deborah Gist’s own words


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

I missed Deborah Gist’s speech at the State House tonight (read RI Future alum Dan McGowan’s coverage on WPRI here), but I did put the text of her speech into Wordle and it spit out this pretty neat word cloud of her remarks:

gist speech narrowHere are a few words you won’t see in the above graphic depiction of her speech, which I think belong in any talk about the state of education in Rhode Island:

  • achievement gap
  • NECAP
  • Common Core
  • 27 percent

A few other observations:

  • “Students” was the most prominent word, along with “Rhode Island”
  • “STEM” seem to have the same prominence as “learning”
  • “Technology” seems to have a greater prominence than “teachers”

I’d love to hear from our readers in the comments about what observations you all have about her speech, or this depiction of it.

Oxfam Report: Half of world’s wealth controlled by 1%


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

oxfam richJust a week before the 44th annual gathering of the global elite at World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Oxford, England-based Oxfam International released a scathing report claiming that global wealth rests in the hands of just a few very rich people.

According to the report released on Jan. 20, co-authored by Ricardo Fuentes-Nieva, Head of Research, Oxfam Great Britain and Nicholas Galasso, Research and Policy Advisor, Oxfam America, 85 of the wealthiest people own the same amount of wealth as the bottom half of the world’s population.

Widening Income Gap Between Wealthy and Poor

Oxfam’s 31 page report, “Working for the Few,” warns that almost half of the world’s wealth concentrated in just one percent of the population, is a real threat to inclusive political and economic systems, and compounds other economic inequalities – such as those between women and men. The authors say, left unchecked, political institutions are undermined and governments overwhelmingly serve the interests of economic elites – to the detriment of the poor and middle class.

Today the gap between the rich and poor has become wider, with the wealth of the one percent richest people in the world amounting to $110 trillion, adds the report, around 65 times the total wealth of the bottom half of the world’s population. In the United States, the wealthiest one percent captured 95 percent of post-financial crisis growth since 2009, while the bottom 90 percent became poorer.

“Without a concerted effort to tackle inequality, the cascade of privilege and of disadvantage will continue down the generations,” warns Oxfam’s Executive Director, Winnie Byanyima, in her statement announcing the release of her group’s report. She leads the world-wide development organization comprised of 17 organizations working in 90 countries to find solutions to poverty and related injustice around the world.

Byanyima, a grass-roots activist, human rights advocate and a world recognized expert on women’s rights, who plans to attend the Davos meeting, observes, “It is staggering that in the 21st Century, half of the world’s population owns no more than tiny elite whose numbers could all sit comfortably in a single train carriage.”

“We cannot hope to win the fight against poverty without tackling inequality. Widening inequality is creating a vicious circle where wealth and power are increasingly concentrated in the hands of a few, leaving the rest of us to fight over crumbs from the top table,” says Bryanyima.

Bryanyima adds, “In developed and developing countries alike, we are increasingly living in a world where the lowest tax rates, the best health and education and the opportunity to influence are being given not just to the rich but also to their children.”

“Without a concerted effort to tackle inequality, the cascade of privilege and of disadvantage will continue down the generations,” states Bryanyima, noting that “We will soon live in a world where equality of opportunity is just a dream.”

Specific policies have widened the income gap between the rich and poor over the last decades, including financial deregulation, tax havens and secrecy, anti-competitive business practice, lower tax rates on high incomes and investments and cuts or underinvestment in public services for the majority. For instance, since the late 1970s, tax rates for the richest have fallen in 29 of the 30 countries for which data are available. In these places the rich not only get more money but also pay less tax on it.

Oxfam’s report calls on those gathered at this week’s World Economic Forum to take tackle inequity by cracking down on financial secrecy and tax dodging, including investing in universal education and healthcare; demand a living wage in all companies, and agreeing a global goal to end extreme inequality in every country.

Inequity in Our Back Yard, Too

Commenting on Oxfam’s report release, Robert B. Reich, former Secretary of Labor under President Bill Clinton who now serves as Chancellor’s Professor of Public Policy at the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley, notes that inequality in the United State is not “that far off” from other countries. “Here, the 400 richest Americans have more wealth than the bottom 150 million Americans put together. We’re getting close to a tipping point where inequality undermines our economy (because the vast middle class doesn’t have the purchasing power to keep the economy going), hurts our democracy (because a handful of extremely rich individuals can control politics), and causes most people to feel the dice are loaded against them, he says.

Reich’s award-winning documentary “Inequality for All” — now out on iTunes, DVD, and On Demand — explains the roots of inequality, in the U.S. and around the world. For details, go to http://www.inequalityforall.com.

Kate Brewster, Executive Director of Rhode Island’s The Economic Progress Institute, notes that Oxfam’s report puts the growing problem of inequality on the world stage. “As the experts point out, inequality is not inevitable, but a man made problem that can be tackled with policies that reward everyone for hard work, not just a few,” she says.

“Rhode Island has not escaped this disturbing trend,” states Brewster. According to a report issued by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the Ocean State experienced the 9th largest increase in income inequality in the country between the late 1970s and mid-2000s. During this time the income of the top fifth rose by 99 percent while the bottom fifth grew by only 12 percent, she says.

Legislative Fixes to Reduce Income Gap

Brewster says there are two “two concrete policies” that the Rhode Island General Assembly could enact this legislative session that would immediately boost the income of low-income Rhode Islanders and begin to reverse this trend, specifically increasing the state’s minimum wage and increasing the refund available through the state’s Earned Income Tax Credit. “The latter would not only boost the income of low-wage workers but also bring more equity to a tax structure that has provided significant tax breaks to wealthy individuals and businesses for years,” she says.

Advocate Susan Sweet, a former state official and lobbyist for nonprofit groups, notes that while Rhode Island and the nation don’t have an overwhelming majority of citizens suffering the worst extremes of poverty such as starvation, homelessness and societal abandonment that exists in some other countries, we have our share. We also have a large and expanding underclass of counter culture and underground economy that serves to hurt the cohesiveness of society,” says the Rumford resident.

Sweet worries about the income gap between the poor and wealthy that will happen in years to come because of state policies. “The state took millions away from retired people who are receiving an average of $25,000 a year in their state pension and are in their seventies on average. The state gambled on the Studio 38 boondoggle, sold these risky bonds to unknown parties, and want to pay these gambling debts back to the investors because they have a ‘moral obligation’ to do so. Where is the moral obligation to those who performed their responsibilities by working for the state for many years with the promise of a secure retirement?” she says.

And what does she expect to see coming out of the General Assembly? “This year we will hear rhetoric to raise the absurdly low minimum wage in the nation and in the state, but not enough to give workers a decent living wage; we will hear promises to improve education, while students that have tried to achieve under great odds will be denied high school diplomas while the educational infrastructure remains in place and unchanging; we will be assured that the key to R.I.’s unyielding high unemployment rate has been found – again; and we will continue on the path of inequality.”

Oak Hill resident, Lisa Roseman Beade, an academic tutor who is been active in Progressive causes, says the U.S. has the widest income gap of any developing nation. “’Trickle down economics’ has turned into “vacuum upwards economics”. We need fair wages and fair and equitable taxation rates to circulate the money. That’s what puts people to work and will reduce the widening income gap between the nation’s wealthy and poor. Instead, workers, who have been breaking the bar in productivity year after year, now receive only 1 percent of the record breaking profits.”

Beade calls for keeping corporate dollars out of politics and supports the creation of a single payer healthcare system that would make healthcare a civil right.

She believes that change will only come when “we all stop the scape-goating teachers and workers and public employees and demand that we all have good wages, good benefits and good pensions and by restoring state levels to those pre-1998. If lower taxes create jobs, and taxes have never been lower…where are the jobs?”

“A vibrant, safe and livable community with good community services can only come if everyone earns enough and everyone pays their fair share of taxes. Let’s make paying taxes patriotic again,” says Beade.

A Final Note…

It’s time to hammer out a comprehensive legislative fix to reducing the wide income gap between the Ocean State’s wealthy and poor. Let those declared candidates for Governor come out with detailed briefing papers, unveiling their comprehensive approach to enable Rhode Islanders to finally make a living wage. That is tell the voters how you will close the income gap between the state’s have and have nots. Let the debate begin.

Herb Weiss, LRI ’12, is a writer who covers aging, health care, medical issues and Rhode Island’s political scene.

EPA’s McCarthy says Obama may use executive order to regulate CO2


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Obama SOTU 14 Since President Obama’s State of the Union lacked details on he was going to address the accelerating climate change problems while touting his “all-of-the above” energy policy that was buoyed up by domestic “fracking” of oil and gas and the need to Fast Track trade deals like the Trans Pacific Partnership that “protect the environment (the opposite of what leaked documents indicated)”, I was not excited when he later said “if congress won’t act, then I will.”

However, when I (along with 15,000 people) got on a conference call last night with EPA Director Gina McCarthy, I was pleasantly surprised to hear her say that Obama was serious about using executive orders to strengthen the EPA, indicating that he had already issued one when he asked when-not if- she would be ready to start regulating Greenhouse Gas emissions.

RIPTA Eco pass  Gina also said there will be “creative funding sources” in the pipeline to help do things like expand mass transit, “one of the most important sources that receives too little attention” along with smart sustainable solutions like biomass waste facilities that capture methane at dump sites.

The call was sponsored by the Environmental Defense Fund, who McCarthy said will help make the argument that “addressing Climate Change is the key to controlling the the new economy,” an approach that RI St. Rep. Art “Climate Change Solutions Guy” Handy is trying to take with the new Climate Change Bill in RI.

In an important notice to the Rhode Island State House, when McCarthy was asked “where to start,” she said “the first thing is to look up your states, cities and towns Climate Change Plan.” She used her hometown Boston as an example and said “you will be amazed what you find in there.”

This underscores the need for Rhode Island to get a Climate Change Bill passed this year, one that has targets like Sierra Club’s Fossil Free by 2030 that reflect the realities of the challenge; regulators have more power when state and municipalities have laws with targets and a plan of action that the EPA can help by enforcing Federal standards.

Word cloud_sotu_2014_word_cloud_605  McCarthy said that to be successful, environmental groups will have to invest time and money into spreading the word on the benefits of making necessary changes sooner than later.

Also, that water pollution and air pollution are just plain bad for everyone everywhere, and carbon pollution, which is a byproduct of burning fossil fuels, can be addressed at the source by replacing them with renewable technologies as quickly as possible.

The EDF website shows a media campaign being developed for a Valentines Day launch that will include television advertising.

McCarthy said, “now, that like in the ’70’s when real legislation was passed¦it’s all about the grassroots” – the EPA has a lot of tools for this on their website but it is up to activists to get this information out.

West-Virginia-chemical-spill   Another concern was chemical pollution, and Gina stated that the West Virginia’s Freedom Industries spill demonstrates how weak Toxic Chemical regulations are and the dangers it presents to public health.

This is one tragedy that could have been avoided but there are many more happening every day and disasters in waiting. She urged the immediate passage of the Toxic Chemical Safety Improvement Act- now reintroduced by Barbara Boxer in the Senate.

Tying this together with Climate Change, was for activists to emphasis the health benefits of C02 standards, green energy and a green energy lifestyle, something the American Lung Association has worked on for a long time.

“Climate change is the biggest challenge we face in terms of public health. In addition to the benefits of reducing CO2, It causes ozone depletion which makes the air harder to breath” McCarthy noted, going on to say that this “is a economic issue as well as it disproportionally hurts the poor and people of color.”

“A green energy lifestyle is better because cleaner air and water is better.” Even small things like urban community gardens can be big things. In DC McCarthy said she went to one that was put in an abandoned lot in a poor urban area and now “the people have fresh food and a connection to the land.”

sotu_solar 5 fold increase   This will take new technology is new jobs – “Green is all about jobs that will keep the economy and our communities sustainable (it is a win-win).”

Peter Galvin from the RI Sierra Club commented “ we have known this for a long time, action on this now could open the door to making this an election issue which will reinforce the growing renewable/sustainable businesses that are happening now.

She mentioned that caring about how what we do effects other countries is an olive branch from a foreign policy perspective and advised “to go easy one China bashing-1/3 of one region of China has a cap & trade policy working well,” and pollution is a big issue there.

In closing McCarthy reiterated- “power plants are not the only source (of green house gasses)…addressing transportation is a key issue adding  “keep people excited about building a green sustainable economy.”

Gina ended by thanking the grass roots activists that were already working for this, don’t wait for politicians to act, and remember “we are all in this together.”

This sheds a different light on Obama’s statements in the State of the Union-”Climate change is a fact…And when our children’s children look us in the eye and ask if we did all we could to leave them a safer, more stable world, with new sources of energy, I want us to be able to say yes, we did.”

When he made a commitment to protecting our pristine wilderness areas and reiterated his commitment to have the Environmental Protection Agency implement those carbon pollution limits was he “showing his cards” to environmental groups like EDF, Natural Resources Defense Council Obama (Reaffirms Commitment to Climate Action in State of the Union http://huff.to/1egu16w) and Sierra Club?

As Michael Brune, Sierra Club Executive Director, stated in his response:

“As the president put it…we must act on the climate crisis ‘before it’s too late.’ We couldn’t agree more. The Sierra Club thanks President Obama for his strong words in his State of the Union address, and we applaud his vow to prioritize innovative climate solutions, including investments in jobs-producing solar and wind energy as well as a focus on energy and fuel efficiency. These are critical steps forward in the fight against climate disruption, but that progress would be rolled back by more destructive oil drilling and gas fracking, and the burning of toxic tar sands.

This opening directive to the EPA to get busy regulating CO2 is an encouraging sign, but there is still work to do on Obama’s over all approach.

Note: In a poll by Generation Progress, Millennial’s rated addressing Climate Change with Green Jobs 2nd in their concerns, tied with Healthcare. First was “creating a Fair Economy” and 4th was student debt.

8 Actions Young Americans Want To Hear President Obama Discuss In …

Melleneal responces to SOTU

Ken Block, ideological stringency and the People’s Pledge


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Ken Block

I read with interest Ken Block’s rejection of the People’s Pledge on the following basis:

“I support comprehensive campaign-finance reform,” Block said. “But I won’t do it piecemeal.” And a People’s Pledge wouldn’t address the disadvantage he’d face against incumbents such as Raimondo, “who has spent three full years as treasurer raising money for this race,” he said.

Ken BlockSomething similar to “I won’t do it piecemeal” is a common refrain I hear among supporters of change or reform; most notably among left-wing opponents of the ACA (it didn’t go far enough!). I have no desire to rehash that particular battle, but suffice it to say, we have to deal in political realities, not political desires.

It’s a weird thing for a Republican candidate to oppose the People’s Pledge on the grounds of it doesn’t do enough to address the problem. Republicans of the Citizen’s United-era have been generally anti-campaign-finance reform. And if Block is keeping his previous position of “moderate,” a People’s Pledge would be in line with the model New England “moderate” Republican Scott Brown.

The argument that the Pledge is piecemeal is particularly flimsy. Citzen’s United has made the goals of the campaign-finance reform movement relatively unachievable; the striking down of McCain-Feingold’s section of unlimited corporate and union spending has made so-called “dark money” an increasing reality in all campaigns. And the People’s Pledge is proven to work at reducing that dark money spending.

Ideological stringency can be well and good. Refusing to support something over a matter of principle can be quite admirable. Opposing things as not going far enough when they would be ineffective or damaging is sensible. But this is neither of those cases. The Pledge notably advances the campaign-finance reform movement’s goals while providing proof to skeptical citizens that reform has an impact. Furthermore, while Block’s support of reform is proven and well-known, his ability to get it passed is non-existent. Democratic efforts, notably those under Rep. Chris Blazejewski, have been far more successful (unsurprisingly), though they often run into First Amendment issues and sometimes work indiscriminately when a targeted approach is called for.

One factor gone unsung in this is that the People’s Pledge has been a defining issue of the Democratic primary campaign, I think largely because the campaign-finance reform movement in the Democratic Party is far greater than that in the Republican Party (which is next to non-existent as far as I know). Block’s refusal to support it keeps him from supporting a “Democratic” issue, but also gives him space to keep up his usual attack line of the “ineffectiveness” of Democratic policies. However, it also provides the opening for Block’s primary opponent Allan Fung from having to take a stand on the Pledge one way or the other until the general election (should he beat Block, which seems likely).

As a final thought, Block’s criticism of Raimondo rings hollow. After all, what are we to believe Block was doing for the last three years, not preparing to run for governor?

How a stink tank manipulates the apparatus of scholarship


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

A few years ago, the Ocean State Policy Research Institute put out a very funny study that tried to use IRS migration data to demonstrate how high taxes were going to cost Rhode Island millions of lost dollars when people were driven from the state. The document had lots of footnotes, so it looked like a study, but the authors hadn’t noticed the IRS data they cited was about the movement of people, not money. That is, the OSPRI report only proved the authors hadn’t read the technical report on the IRS data before sending out the press releases.

OSPRI is gone now, joining the Education Partnership, ripolicyanalysis.org, the Citizens Foundation, and many more in that angry Valhalla of conservative Rhode Island think tanks. But don’t despair!  The RI Center for Freedom, Prosperity, Motherhood and Apple Pie (CFPMAP) is here to fill this terrible void. As I’ve written, researchers at CFPMAP are behind the ongoing discussion, such as it is, of the sales tax decrease.

When you go read the supporting documentation behind the CFPMAP claims about the economic impacts of the sales tax decrease, you find they use an economic modeling tool they call RI-STAMP.

ooh!  impressive, isn't it?
Equation 7 from the STAMP technical report. This is not a presentation intended to elucidate, but to obscure, how the model works.

The RI-STAMP model is based on the STAMP model, developed by the Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University. Beacon Hill has done us all the service of publishing a lovely technical report on the model, filled with dense and intentionally impressive equations like the one here, which might distract the unwary from sentences like these:

“The savings rates for households at each income level were adjusted based on professional judgement [sic]…” [p.15]

“The trade data for the state are not particularly reliable; we have used our judgement [sic]…” [p.21]

“As with export demand we have used our judgement [sic], combined with BEA data, to arrive at sensible estimates [for import demand].” [p.21]

“Information on flows between the state and the rest of the world is difficult to piece together, and is an area where considerable professional judgment is required.” [p.11]

“We used professional judgment in determining the proper elasticities for each household group.”[p.16]

This last one was an estimate of how likely poor people are to avoid work if welfare payments increase. They described this professional judgment:

“The participation rate for low‐income households is assumed to be highly sensitive to the level of transfer payments, but relatively insensitive to changes in taxes or the [wa]ge rate. On the other hand, high‐income households are assumed to respond substantially to changes in the taxes and wage rates they face.”

In other words, a rise or fall in wages has a large impact on the behavior of high-income households, but a much lower impact on the behavior of low-income households. The latter are, however, assumed to be quite sensitive to the level of welfare payments. This is, shall we say, a debatable proposition, even in the economics literature. As are the other propositions on which they exercised their “judgment.”

There are also questionable assumptions about how federal dollars are spent in Rhode Island, whether all sellers of labor and capital can find buyers (unemployed much?), the extent to which businesses who have profit here also have owners here, and much more. One can go on at some length, but why bother?  The model is, like most models (including the ones I use), a collection of predictions developed from the assumptions of the researchers who put it together. Dependence on assumptions is nothing extraordinary. It’s burying those assumptions under a collection of poorly-explained and almost parodic equations that is nothing more than intellectual bullying.

The performance of a model like this can be tuned on past events. We’ve had lots of tax cuts these guys could have practiced on. Did their model say tax collections went up despite the tax cuts of 1997-2002, 2001, 2005, or 2007-2011?  If so, they don’t say. If the model can properly model those past realities, then you’ll potentially have something useful to predict future ones. Without that, all the fancy equations in the world can’t sell your results.

Hide the bias

The RI CFPMAP writers praise “dynamic” modeling of tax policy changes over “static” models because the former takes into account secondary effects of the tax change. In theory, they are quite right. Any change in tax policy typically has lots of secondary effects, and a competent modeler at least has to keep them in mind, and take them into account if they’re big enough. The kinds of dynamic tax models at issue here have been used widely in California since a law mandated them from 1996-2000. The record there was pretty mixed. A report by Jon Vasche, the director of Economics and Taxation in their state legislative research agency, pointed out these models didn’t do away with debate, and their results were “very sensitive to their underlying assumptions.”

And that’s the key: dynamic models are often just a convenient way to hide researcher biases behind technical snowdrifts few reporters can or will wade through. Issues like how many people move due to changes in tax rates or the sensitivity of investment decisions to economic conditions are the subject of ongoing research and debate. Hiding those issues allows model owners to assume the results they believe will be true without admitting that’s what they’re doing. It’s more elaborate to be sure, but no different from the butcher blocking your view of his thumb on the scale. Beacon Hill built a model that assumes the existence of a tax-cut fairy, and shockingly, the CFPMAP guys have found that model to show a sales tax cut would create an economic boom for Rhode Island. Who would have thought it?

In his landmark 1963 speech about the common strains among conservative movements in the US, historian Richard Hofstadter pointed out that certain elements of the right wing in America dote on the “apparatus of scholarship” even while they seemed to miss the point. Like the footnotes in that old OSPRI report, the CFPMAP authors use the apparatus of scholarship to mask partisan assumptions in the guise of documentation. Unfortunately, it’s not enough just to have footnotes and equations; it matters what they say.

Reports like these are little more than snares for gullible reporters. The strategy usually works: the snares get set, reporters step in them, and presto, the findings appear in news headlines and on talk shows. And then there are legislative commissions and hearings and pretty soon what seems like a crazy idea seems normal, and that’s the point.

Beyond the problem of defending our state against another bad idea, the real issue is that there is a moral dimension to lobbying. This is not a game. What happens up at the State House really matters. It is hardly unheard of for lives to be ruined and people to die because of bad decisions made there. Advocates, it seems to me, have a heavy responsibility to tread lightly on uncertain ice — someone might actually take their advice. The sales tax proposal on offer here invites us to stroll confidently out on that ice with nothing more than the CFPMAP’s word to say it will be safe. The question isn’t just would you take this advice, but with sourcing as thin and deliberately obfuscatory as this, would you feel good about giving it?

Anti-Depetro group gets 14 politicians to boycott advertising on WPRO


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

depetroInitially the campaign targeting shock jock John DePetro focused on one advertiser. But now the group has organized at least 14 high-level politicians who say they won’t spend their campaign dollars on WPRO until DePetro is off the air.

“We’ve appealed to WPRO and Cumulus Media’s sense of decency in requesting that they sever their relationship with a man who degrades women by calling them whores, but it appears the only way to achieve a permanent solution is to further demonstrate just how bad this individual is for business,” said labor leader Maureen Martin, who has been the public face of For Our Daughters, the group that is trying to get DePetro off the air. “We expect others candidates and businesses will join them as our campaign grows in strength and numbers every day.”

In September, DePetro called two female labor activists whores on his WPRO morning radio show. Additionally, he’s made untrue and unfair accusations about many Democrats and left-leaning community and political groups. He was fired from a radio station in Boston for calling a gubernatorial candidate a “fat lesbian.” He and WPRO are bieng sued by a WPRO employee for sexual harassment. His wife took blame for a ratings scandal in which someone from his home address faked industry reporting forms.

Even before this campaign DePetro was widely disliked, untrusted  and often even ostracized among the political class in Rhode Island, as well among almost all of his coworkers at WPRO, but station management maintains that he still draws listeners.

Here’s the list of candidates (and one PAC) who said they will not advertise with WPRO:

  • US Senator Jack Reed
  • US Rep. Jim Langevin
  • US Rep. David Cicilline
  • Providence Mayor and Gubernatorial Candidate Angel Taveras
  • Gubernatorial Candidate Clay Pell
  • Secretary of State and Lt. Governor Candidate Ralph Mollis
  • Secretary of State Candidate Guillaume de Ramel
  • Secretary of State Candidate Nellie Gorbea
  • General Treasurer Candidate Seth Magaziner
  • General Treasurer Candidate Frank Caprio
  • Providence Mayoral Candidate Brett Smiley
  • Providence City Council President and Mayoral Candidate Michael Solomon
  • Providence Mayoral Candidate Jorge Elorza
  • Providence Mayoral Candidate Lorne Adrain
  • American LeadHerShip PAC Chair Kate Coyne-McCoy

Malcus Mills of DARE: Just Cause bill would protect RIers instead of big banks


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

just cause“Just Cause” legislation “is a response to the foreclosure crisis that would keep tenants in their homes,” Malcus Mill, a DARE activist, told me yesterday in a phone interview. “See, when the bank takes over a home, when they foreclose on a home, they are usually asking the tenants to leave and a lot of the time that puts the tenant in danger of being homeless.”

The bill was considered last session, but was left on the cutting room floor after lobbyists had what Mills called “a poison pill” inserted into the bill. This session, Mills, DARE and others are planning a full-court press to pass the bill to protect Rhode Islanders instead of big banks.

Listen to our conversation:

Brown alumni say school handled Ray Kelly protest poorly


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

ray kelly protestA group of Brown graduates have sent a letter to the university expressing their disappointment with the way the school reacted to students and community members protesting NYC top cop Ray Kelly in October. The architect of New York City’s controversial stop and frisk policy, Kelly was shouted down at a Brown presentation in October and the University reacted by admonishing the protesters.

“We are impressed and inspired by the actions of the students who protested Commissioner Kelly’s speech,” says the letter. “We agree that the university must promote open discourse, but we also believe that peaceful protest and, yes, even disruptive protest, are bedrock expressions of free speech. We urge you not to limit the protections of speech to polite discourse.”

The Ray Kelly protest not only divided the Brown community, but also the progressive left in Rhode Island. For example, Bob Walsh head of the state’s most influential teachers’ union castigated the protest on Facebook calling it an ineffective tactic, while Aaron Regunberg, head of the state’s most influential student union, defended the direct action saying such a tactic was the only way to get the community’s attention.

Andrew Tillit-Saks wrote this compelling op/ed about the reaction to the protest.

Here’s the letter the alumni group sent to their school:

Dear President Paxson and Professor Anthony Bogues:

We, the undersigned alumni of Brown University, write to you to express our serious concern about the manner in which the University is addressing the events surrounding New York Police Department (“NYPD”) Commissioner Ray Kelly’s speech. We have reviewed the video footage of the event, as well as ensuing news coverage, and we believe that the students who protested Commissioner Kelly – both inside of and outside of the event – behaved admirably in denouncing Commissioner Kelly’s actions and in calling out injustice.

Brown University has a long and proud history of student protests. During the Vietnam War, students walked out on a lecture by General Earle Wheeler, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, while others protested by shouting at General Wheeler. When the University invited Henry Kissinger to speak during Commencement in 1969 and awarded him an honorary degree, students stood up during Kissinger’s speech and turned their backs on him. In 1981, students picketed a speech by William Casey, director of the Central Intelligence Agency; during Casey’s lecture, numerous students stood up and disrupted Casey’s speech by reciting Lewis Carroll’s Jabberwocky. In these and countless other moments, Brown students have used peaceful protest and direct action to challenge injustice. We are proud to be a part of an institution that has such a strong and inspiring history of student protest.

In President Paxson’s November 6, 2013 letter to the Brown community, she wrote: “Brown’s core value of promoting the free and open exchange of ideas is bedrock to our capacity to fulfill our mission as a university. This value applies not only when ideas are agreeable and aligned with our own. Protecting the right to free expression and promoting open discourse is even more essential when ideas are divergent, abhorrent or even hurtful.”

We agree that the university must promote open discourse, but we also believe that peaceful protest and, yes, even disruptive protest, are bedrock expressions of free speech. We urge you not to limit the protections of speech to polite discourse. Rather, we urge Professor Bogues, as well as the other members of the disciplinary committee that has been convened, to understand that the freedom of expression encompasses a much broader range of speech: heated discussion, chants and protests, intemperate remarks, and speech that makes many of us uncomfortable.

Protecting the freedom of expression is a messy endeavor, but we hope that you and the disciplinary committee do not undermine the role of protest and direct action in Brown’s intellectual community.

We are impressed and inspired by the actions of the students who protested Commissioner Kelly’s speech. The Taubman Center had invited Kelly to deliver the Noah Krieger ’93 Memorial Lecture. We note that, in inviting Kelly to give a named lecture at a preeminent university, the Taubman Center lent Kelly legitimacy, prestige, and the opportunity to burnish his troubled public image. Kelly presided over countless violations of civil rights during his tenure as NYPD Commissioner – including the stop-and-frisk program, the unlawful detention of protestors at the 2004 Republican National Convention, the surveillance of mosques and Muslim citizens, among others.

We support the students’ actions and we hope that the Committee will not discipline them for their use of peaceful protest to challenge injustice. Instead, we urge you to support students who take a stand against institutional racism and structural violence.

Sincerely,

Cristina Gallo ‘02
Molly Thomas-Jensen ‘02
Sharif Corinaldi ‘00
Keren Wheeler ‘00
Peter Asen ‘04
Martha Oatis ‘03
Damali Campbell ‘01
Annabelle Heckler ‘08
Amber Knighten ‘02
Seth Leibson ‘05
Sara Nolan ‘01
Riana Good ‘03
Abena Asare ‘02
Melissa Sontag Broudo ‘01.5
Kaizar Campwala ‘02
Anne Lessy ‘13
Rocket Caleshu ‘06
Ida Moen Johnson ‘05
Sam Musher ‘01
Molly Geidel ‘03
Rebecca Rast ‘13.5
Martha Patten ‘02
Alexa Engelman ‘03.5
Alisa Gallo ‘93
Karen Pittelman ‘97
Marisa Hernández-Stern ‘05
César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández ‘02
Maria Walker ‘02
Matthew Palevsky ‘07
Emma Clippinger ‘09
Ariel Werner ‘09
Rachel Judge ‘07
Robert Smith III ‘09
Nicholas Chung ‘09
Sheila Thomas ‘70
Chloe Holzman ‘02
Bruktaweit Addis ‘11
Janet Santos ‘02, ‘07 M.A.
Nicholas Werle ‘10
Jonathan Allmaier ‘02
Michael Enriquez ‘11
Darshan Patel ‘09
Caroline Young ‘05.5
Alison Klayman ‘06
Amy Joyce ‘01.5
Alex Werth ‘09

Providence Student Union says the state is using kids as lab rats for testing policy


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC06659Mining a tradition that stretches back to Athenian democracy and probably much earlier, members of the Providence Student Union (PSU) engaged in political theater to protest the “the ill-conceived experiment” of “Rhode Island’s new high-stakes testing graduation requirement” yesterday in the State House rotunda.

The event was timed to occur two days before the release of the NECAP results which will reveal which students will not be earning a diploma and graduating this year.

In “Operation: Guinea Pig” students dressed as guinea pigs and lab rats because, as PSU member Jose Serrano said, “that is how we are being treated.” Serrano continued, “The Department of Education hypothesized that high-stakes testing alone, without the extra resources our schools need, would solve our education problems. But this was an unproven gamble, which is becoming clearer with every exemption and waiver and backtrack that RIDE releases. This crazy experiment is playing with our futures, and we are here to say this needs to stop!”

State Representative Teresa Tanzi also spoke at the event, urging her fellow legislators to pass bills that would change the NECAP from a requirement for graduation to a diagnostic tool, or put aside the NECAP requirement pending a five year study of its efficacy. “I have spent time in five different schools in my community,” said Tanzi, “The themes that appeared through all of these hours of conversations have been stark. Learning has taken a back seat to test preparation, the culture of the classroom has changed dramatically, and the quality of education suffers.”

Rounding out the speakers was PSU member Sam Foer who lead the students and their supporters in chants of “High stakes testing is not right! That is why we have to fight!” after telling legislators, “You have the final say: do you support treating students like nothing more than guinea pigs in an experiment, or do you want to put an end to this gamble with our lives? We leave it up to you.”

DSC06655

DSC06656

DSC06657

DSC06660

DSC06662

DSC06668

DSC06670

DSC06671

DSC06675

DSC06676

DSC06680

DSC06683

DSC06692

DSC06693