Taveras, Raimondo vie for Democratic endorsements


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Public polling is neck-and-neck as Gina Raimondo and Angel Taveras campaign to be Rhode Island’s next governor. But the battle for endorsements tells a different story.

Perhaps the surprise story of the campaign so far has been the amount of union support Raimondo has garnered. She’s been endorsed by 9 labor unions and Taveras only 3.

Gina Raimondo Angel Taveras
Unions Bricklayers’ and Allied Craftsmen Local 3 Rhode Island State Association of Firefighters
Ironworkers’ Local 37 American Association of University Professors, URI Chapter
Plumbers’ & Pipefitters’ Local 51 United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 328
Plasterers’ and Cement Masons’ Local 40
Roofers’ and Waterproofers’ Local Union No. 33
Sprinkler Fitters Local 669
Operating Engineers’ Local 57
Sheet Metal Workers Local 17
United Steelworkers Local 12431

Given the candidates’ very different reputations on pension reforms one may expect this skew to be the other way around. But the things to keep in mind here is that all of Raimondo’s backing comes from private sector unions and two of Taveras’ endorsements come from public sector unions. While this might not be a clear referendum on pension policy, it goes a long way to refuting the myth of the unified labor movement in the Ocean State.

Here’s a comparison of the city and town committees who have endorsed either Raimondo or Taveras so far:

Gina Raimondo Angel Taveras
Town Committees Barrington Providence
East Greenwich Pawtucket
Foster Smithfield
New Shoreham North Kingstown
North Smithfield Coventy
Scituate Hopkington
Tiverton Westerly
Warren
Cumberland

Raimondo has captured more city and town Democratic committees than Taveras. But there’s also something interesting about where the endorsements are coming from: Raimondo, who has 8* town committees so far (no cities) seems to be attracting the suburban endorsements while Taveras is attracting more urban support, with 7 cities and towns. There’s a practical difference here: the 9 towns (no cities yet) in the Raimondo column only have a combined population of 102,329. The seven city and town committees that gave their support to Taveras have a total population of 362,468.

On the other hand, a municipal committee endorsement certainly does not guarantee the support of party members. For example, the East Greenwich Dems have about as much political juice as the local animal protection league. And while Taveras may have won the endorsement of the Providence Democratic Committee, three Democrats on the City Council are supporting Raimondo: Davian Sanchez, Louis Aponte and Sabina Matos.

When it comes from endorsements of state legislators, it isn’t even close. With endorsements from 9 of 32 Senate Democrats and 24 of the 69 House Dems, Taveras already has significant chunks of both chambers on lock down. Raimondo only has three legislative endorsements so far.

Gina Raimondo Angel Taveras
State Senators Donna Nesselbush, Pawtucket Maryellen Goodwin, Providence
Juan Pichardo, Providence
Gayle Goldin, Providence
Daniel Da Ponte, East Providence
Elizabeth Crowley, Central Falls
Roger Picard, Woonsocket
James E. Doyle, Pawtucket
Leonidas Raptakis, Coventry
Adam Satchell, West Warwick
State Reps Grace Diaz, Providence John DeSimone, Providence
Anastasia Williams, Providence Joseph Almeida, Providence
Scott Slater, Providence
Tom Palangio, Providence
Helio Melo, East Providence
Gregg Amore, East Providence
Katherine Kazarian, East Providence
Ray Johnston, Pawtucket
Mary Messier, Pawtucket
Frank Ferri, Warwick
David Bennett, Warwick
Stephen Casey, Woonsocket
Michael Morin, Woonsocket
James McLaughlin, Central Falls
Agostinho Silva, Central Falls
Patricia Serpa, West Warwick
Marvin Abney, Newport
Robert Craven, North Kingstown
Scott Guthrie, Coventry
Lisa Tomasso, Coventry
Deborah Fellela, Johnston
John Edwards, Tiverton
Larry Valencia, Richmond/Exeter
Donna Walsh, Charlestown

Another interesting comparison of former politicians who have endorsed so far. Make of this what you will:

Gina Raimondo Angel Taveras
Former pols Myrth York, former gov. candidate U.S. Senator Tom Harkin
former RI Gov. Philip Noel former Pawtucket Mayor James E. Doyle
former state Senator Rhoda Perry

* This post has been updated to reflect new information from the Raimondo campaign, namely that the Cumberland Democratic Party has also endorsed her.

Providence Democrats back Taveras


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

taveras_sotcProvidence Mayor Angel Taveras has won the endorsement of the Providence Democratic Party, his campaign announced today.

“For the past three and a half years our committee has been witness to the Mayor’s tireless efforts on behalf of our city,” said state Senator said Maryellen Goodwin, the committee chairwoman. Goodwin works in City Hall for the planning department and served as Taveras’ acting chief of staff after Matt Jerzyk and Arianne Lynch left his administration.

“He has been honest, straightforward and has worked to bring people together and build consensus in order to put Providence on the right path. Providence’s Road Improvement Project which began last year and invests $40 million to pave over 60 miles of road in our Capital City is a tangible example of this,” she said. “We know these are values he will bring with him to the State House and could not be happier to offer him our endorsement in the race for Governor.”

Providence is the sixth town/city Democratic committee to endorse Taveras. Previously, he was backed by the Democratic town committees from Pawtucket, Smithfield, North Kingstown, Coventry and Hopkinton. He has also won the endorsement of 9 state senators and 24 House members, listed below.

  • Senator Elizabeth Crowley,
  • Senator Daniel Da Ponte,
  • Senator James E. Doyle II,
  • Senator Gayle Goldin,
  • Senator Maryellen Goodwin,
  • Senator Roger Picard,
  • Senator Juan Pichardo,
  • Senator Leonidas Raptakis,
  • Senator Adam Satchell,
  • Representative Marvin Abney,
  • Representative Joseph Almeida,
  • Representative Gregg Amore,
  • Representative David Bennett,
  • Representative Stephen Casey,
  • Representative Robert Craven Sr.,
  • Representative John DeSimone,
  • Representative John Edwards,
  • Representative Deborah Fellela,
  • Representative Frank Ferri,
  • Representative Scott Guthrie,
  • Representative Ray Johnston,
  • Representative Katherine Kazarian,
  • Representative James McLaughlin,
  • Representative Helio Melo,
  • Representative Mary Messier,
  • Representative Michael Morin,
  • Representative Tom Palangio,
  • Representative Patricia Serpa,
  • Representative Agostinho Silva,
  • Representative Scott Slater,
  • Representative Lisa Tomasso,
  • Representative Larry Valencia,
  • Representative Donna Walsh,

When does the right to petition become lobbying?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Candidate for Democratic nominee for Secretary of State Guillaume de Ramel in The Providence Journal 5/26/14 (emphasis added):

Rhode Island’s special distinction for “limited activity” lobbyists has created A gray area in the law prone to causing confusion or even unintentional noncompliance. Anyone who lobbies state government should be registered with the secretary of state’s office, regardless of how little he or she does so.

Article I, Section 21 of the Rhode Island State Constitution (emphasis added):

Section 21. Right to assembly — Redress of grievances — Freedom of speech. — The citizens have a right in a peaceable manner to assembly for their common good, and to apply to those invested with the powers of government, for redress of grievances, or for other purposes, by petition, address, or remonstrance. No law abridging the freedom of speech shall be enacted.

de ramelPlenty of organizations make calls to action to legislators’ constituents, asking them to write or call or meet with their representatives to request action on a specific issue. By definition, that’s lobbying. Change.org has even made it as simple as simply putting your name, email, and address in a form and hitting “submit” – no more action is required from the person doing the lobbying. So, are these people supposed to register as lobbyists?

To be fair to de Ramel, even the current Secretary of State’s “Am I a Lobbyist” page is pretty unclear on such people – which of the five exemptions do they fall under? Some will probably argue that there’s a precedent for dealing with those people, and in practice they’re never going to be effected by lobbying laws. But if such a grey area exists (in practice), that highlights the problems with the current system; and what de Ramel’s proposing.

The simpler and more elegant solution that I’ve heard proposed is to simply required state officials to keep lists of everyone they meet with or are contacted by and make those public. That would probably inconvenience officials to some extent (which is probably why such a proposal has zero chance of passing the legislature), but transparency is kind of inconvenient, isn’t it? And it’s probably a bit better than hunting down constituents for requesting their legislator vote this way or that on a gun control bill.

Larry Summers: It’s not the rich, it’s the ROBOTS!


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

RobotThe popularity of Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the 21st Century has conservatives and economic elites in a bit of lather. As they try to refute an economic reality that has become obvious to most everybody, they end up making some transparently deceptive arguments.

Take Larry Summers, who headed up the US Treasury Department at the end of the Clinton Administration and has served as a top economic advisor to Barack Obama. This PBS News Hour piece in which Piketty refutes the criticisms quotes Summers, saying:

Even where capital accumulation is concerned, I am not sure that Piketty’s theory emphasizes the right aspects. Looking to the future, my guess is that the main story connecting capital accumulation and inequality will not be Piketty’s tale of amassing fortunes. It will be the devastating consequences of robots, 3-D printing, artificial intelligence, and the like for those who perform routine tasks. Already there are more American men on disability insurance than doing production work in manufacturing. And the trends are all in the wrong direction, particularly for the less skilled, as the capacity of capital embodying artificial intelligence to replace white-collar as well as blue-collar work will increase rapidly in the years ahead.

This argument is specious in the extreme. It says, in essence, “It’s not that elites like me are accumulating all this wealth; it’s that the ROBOTS are making us accumulate all this wealth.” Summers would have us think that robots are marching in from Robotland and taking over factories in some evil plot to destroy the middle class.

The reality is that economic elites have specifically developed these technologies to eliminate paid workers and increase profits for themselves. They know this, and now many other people know this. That second part kind of scares them because if enough people figure this out, they might actually do something about it.

Nota Bene: At no point does Summers actually say that wealth accumulation is not happening or that this factor is not what’s driving economic inequality or that economic inequality is not a big, big problem. He just says that it’s the robots that did it.

PVD City Council considers hotel minimum wage bill tonight


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Hotel Workers Providence City Hall 012As the Procaccianti Group moves ahead with plans for a new hotel in downtown Providence, employees at another one of its downtown hotels will take their fight for fair wages to the City Council tonight. Employees and activists are requesting the Council pass a $15 an hour minimum wage ordinance for local hotel workers.

The Providence City Council will hold a public hearing to consider the idea today at 6:00 pm.

“I hope the Providence City Council does what is best for the average working mother like me and passes this ordinance,” said Santa Brito, a housekeeper at the Renaissance Providence hotel. “As elections come around, it’s a perfect opportunity to see who’s in the pocket of big business and who actually stands with regular working people of Providence, people from the neighborhoods, people who vote and who they are supposed to represent.”

Hotel employees at two Procaccianti Group-owned Providence hotels – the Renaissance and the Hilton – have been fighting to organize a union for years. The effort gained global attention in 2011, when local brass band What Cheer Brigade played backup to Joey DeFrancesco quitting his job at the Hilton. This year the employee strife has moved to the Renaissance, where activists say two employees have been fired for publicly protesting for higher wages.

Watch what Providence City Councilors are saying about the proposed minimum wage ordinance.


The Procaccianti Group, a property management company that owns and operates hotels globally, receives millions of dollars in tax breaks for the Renaissance hotel. Steve Ahlquist recently reported it lost its TAG accreditation for being LGBTQ friendly in 2013. The company would not comment on the matter. Today, the Providence Journal reports the Procaccianti Group would like to develop a third hotel in downtown.

“As a housekeeper in the Hilton Providence Hotel, I do grueling physical work and make only slightly above $9.00 per hour after eight years of service,” Hilton housekeeper Andrea Hernandez said. “On this paltry wage, I live paycheck to paycheck and can only afford the bare necessities. If I earned just $1.85 more per room cleaned, I could shop at local businesses and invest in my home. The whole city would benefit. There are hundreds of hardworking women like me in Providence hotels who deserve better. We hope the City Council will step up for working women in Providence.”

Hotel workers and their supporters will begin to gather in front of Providence City Hall today at 5:30. See the Facebook invite here.

Green Party challenges campaign finance laws


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Greg Gerritt

I will appear at the RI Board of Elections meeting on Wednesday May 28 at 3:30 PM at Board of Election headquarters, 50 Branch Avenue in Providence to contest a ruling that The Green Party  of Rhode Island can not accept a $75 contribution from the Green Party of the United States.

In an age awash with political money, with Citizens United and related rulings giving more and more groups the opportunity to spend unlimited amounts of money and to hide the donors, How can it be that the Green Party of Rhode Island can not accept money that was donated by Rhode Islanders and is being returned to the Green Party in RI for party building activities? If this rule is not unconstitutional, it at least makes no sense in the current context.

The GPRI has since learned that it is relatively easy for the GPUS to register, and has been informed that the GPUS will register, but believes that a public discussion of these issues is critical for the functioning of democracy and is always happy to do its part to point out the hypocrisy in the political system.

Caprio: Ratings agencies hands weren’t clean in 38 Studios deal


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Frank_CaprioFormer Treasurer (and current candidate for Treasurer) Frank Caprio reached out to me concerning my stories about the deceptive ratings practices of the ratings agencies.

According to Caprio, the ratings agencies hands weren’t clean in the 38 Studios deal because they did in fact overrate the bonds. Furthermore, Caprio asserts that if he is re-elected as Treasurer, that he will dig into the ratings agencies.

As Ian Donnis reported in August 2010, Caprio visibly fought to prevent the 38 Studios deal from happening by going directly to the ratings agencies and investors. Unfortunately, his efforts were circumvented by the EDC, who had the discretionary power to issue the bonds. Some people have criticized Caprio for his initial support for 38 Studios and then changing his stance in opposition of the deal. In my opinion, it was courageous for Caprio to change his mind and he demonstrated leadership qualities by standing up for the taxpayers of Rhode Island.

To take action, Caprio said he would follow similar steps that he took in 2009 regarding the mismanagement scandal at the Central Landfill. Although he didn’t have an official oversight role as Treasurer, he pressured the State to take action. The result was that the right outside experts and attorneys were hired and without even having to file a lawsuit, his work led to a recovery against the Central Landfill board’s directors liability insurance of its policy limit of $5 million dollars.

Concerning the misdeeds by the ratings agencies, Caprio believes RI can look to the actions taken by the Obama administration and states such as CT and CA in seeing which law firms could be possible partners to work with RI against the ratings agencies.

Caprio also claims that the State can save substantial money by not voluntarily repaying the 38 Studios bonds. Instead, the State needs to call the bond insurer (Assured Guaranty) and the bond holders (large institutional investors) to the negotiating table to negotiate a settlement.  He thinks that under the threat of non-payment by the State the insurer (who faces an $80 million dollar payout) and the bondholders would entertain the following:

  1. Since the bondholders have received over $20 million in payments already and the fact they can agree to a waiver of default per the bonds, the state should get the waiver (holders of 50 percent of aggregate principal of bonds have to agree – which is USAA and Transamerica) and start a deliberate negotiation.  Caprio says, “I believe the bondholders will see it in their interest to take a haircut on future payments. The institutional holders of these bonds don’t want the national attention on this minimal investment they have in their multi-billion dollar portfolios.”
  2. The bond insurer should then be asked to be part of the solution with paying the new negotiated reduced amount to the bondholders and in return include them as leading the civil lawsuit currently being litigated against First Southwest, Wells Fargo, executives of EDC, etc. The bond insurer will then be in position to recover any payments it makes as part of this process.

All along this process the rating agencies will be briefed and updated by the State and it’s leaders. No default will happen since we will get time to negotiate per the waiver of default process allowed in the 38 Studio bonds (see page B-46: Waivers of Events of Default).

“I believe the State taxpayers will be relieved of having to make payments now for this failed deal. Remember that the RI taxpayers are not legally obligated to pay this bill per the bond nor by state law,” maintains Caprio.

Caprio has been outspoken on this issue for a while now. Last June, GoLocalProv reported:

Caprio says state, not Wall Street, has leverage

At a minimum, before making a decision on payment, Caprio said the state [needs to] convene a meeting of interested parties—including the bondholders and the insurer on the bonds—to attempt to negotiate a deal using the fact that it is not legally obligated to pay as leverage.

“I’m not going to lead the fight to defend multi-billion [dollar] insurance companies who are sophisticated investors to make sure they are made whole,” Caprio said, adding that the burden of paying back the bonds would fall on the average Rhode Island taxpayer. “If this money was coming out of every legislator’s personal pocket, would they be so quick to pay on debt which they have no legal obligation to pay?”

It seems to me that Caprio has a thorough understanding of the complexities of this issue and I commend him for that. I’ve been frustrated with a lot of other candidates and pundits who have simply been using Wall Street’s own talking points to bully Rhode Islander’s into thinking they have a bogus “moral obligation” to the 1%.

In my next feature, I’ll post candidate for Treasurer Seth Magaziner’s thoughts on how to deal with the ratings agencies.