Angel Taveras, Frank Ferri: Hobby Lobby decision was wrong


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

angel_taverasRhode Island’s elected officials are outraged by the United States Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby decision handed down today.

First Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and Congressman David Cicilline critiqued the high court’s reasoning. Now Providence Mayor Angel Taveras and Lt. Gov. hopeful Warwick Rep. Frank Ferri have also weighed in.

Here’s Mayor Taveras’ statement:

I am deeply disappointed in today’s Supreme Court decision in the Hobby Lobby case. Giving employers the right to decide what type of contraception a woman should have access to is outrageous and sets a dangerous precedent that allows for discrimination. Corporations are not people, and their rights should not trump a woman’s right to receive contraceptive health care coverage.

Ferri, a Warwick state representative running for lt. governor has an interesting take. He’s a small business owner who owns and runs a bowling alley. In a fundraising email Ferri said:

Today’s decisions by a conservative majority of the US Supreme Court to impede women’s access to healthcare and curtail the rights of unions to represent their members should serve as an important reminder of what’s really at stake in this election.

As a small business owner, I would never presume to influence my employees’ health care decisions. That is just wrong.

I’m angry about the Court’s rulings, but being angry isn’t enough. We need to organize and work to make sure a conservative court and right-wing politicians don’t turn back the clock on all the progress we’ve made over the last two decades.

I’m proud to be the only candidate in this race to put his name on the line to defend a woman’s right to choose. When I’m Lt. Governor, our office will unabashedly fight to support women and working families, and stand up to the right wing politicians who will surely look to capitalize on today’s rulings.

 

Cicilline condems SCOTUS for Hobby Lobby decision


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

cicilline primary victoryIn a pointed and detailed statement, Congressman David Cicilline called out the United States Supreme Court for its Hobby Lobby decision made public today saying, “women, not their bosses, should be in charge of their own personal health care choices.”

The controversial SCOTUS decision sent ripples through progressive Rhode Island today. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse also released a statement critical of the high court.

Here is Cicilline’s full statement:

Women, not their bosses, should be in charge of their own personal health care choices. While much work remains, we have made tremendous progress in affording women full equality over many years and this decision rolls back that progress by limiting women’s access to contraceptive health care services.

The Affordable Care Act is designed to ensure women have access to quality, affordable health care, including contraception and family planning — services that are critical to a woman’s health care needs. In fact, an overwhelming majority of women use birth control or contraceptives at some point in their lives and the idea that they should be denied access to these basic health care services because their boss finds it religiously objectionable is ridiculous. While today’s ruling will not undo all the benefits under the Affordable Care Act that allow millions of women to access birth control, it wrongly dictates that a CEO’s religious beliefs outweigh a woman’s right to access affordable contraception. This unfair discrimination contradicts the values of a majority of Americans and has no place in the 21st century. Importantly, today’s decision also sets a bad precedent encouraging other for-profit corporations to deny health care coverage to their employees based on their owners’ religious beliefs.

I am deeply disappointed with the Supreme Court’s ruling and will continue working to stop attacks on women’s access to complete health care services and to advance women’s basic rights. This fight is not over.

20+ community groups urge veto of ‘criminal street gang’ bill


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

State HouseOn the last day of the 2014 legislative session, the General Assembly approved legislation that could place at-risk youth in prison for more than a decade–for a crime as simple as graffiti. The legislation (H-7457 as amended and S-2639 as amended) allows up to 10 additional years on the sentence of anyone convicted of any felony “knowingly committed for the benefit, at the direction of, or in association with any criminal street gang or criminal street gang member.”

More than 20 community groups, including the Institute for the Study and Practice of Nonviolence, Providence Youth Student Movement, and the Rhode Island Civil Rights Roundtable, have come together to urge Governor Chafee to veto this dangerous legislation.

In a letter to Governor Chafee, the groups note that this legislation offers an overly broad definition of “criminal street gangs,” does not differentiate between a “gang” that engages in occasional random acts of vandalism and one that has been involved in murders and other serious felonies, and will likely target at-risk youth who have made a mistake.

Here are excerpts from the groups’ letter to Governor Chafee calling for a veto: 

“Young people may often be coerced into committing crimes for a gang, facing threats of punishment and harm if they fail to do so. Under this bill, they would bear the brunt of the enhanced sentencing provisions. The bill could even have the unintended effect of encouraging gang leaders to make more use of teens in this position, and help insulate the leaders themselves from the enhanced sentences envisioned by this legislation.”

“Instead of assisting youth who are at risk of becoming involved with dangerous individuals, this legislation puts the state in the position of locking up these at-risk youth for lengthy periods of time with exactly the kind of individuals we should be trying to help them avoid.”

“It is the minority community that suffers the most from gang violence. But it is also our community that suffers the most from overly harsh sentencing laws that, either in purpose or effect, target inner city youth and adults. Rather than imposing more and harsher punishment on offenders, including teenagers, the state should be much more focused on prevention, education and mediation activities.”

There’s still time for you to join the effort to stop this legislation. Call or email Governor Chafee and tell him you want this legislation vetoed.

Sheldon on SCOTUS Hobby Lobby decision


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse at Forward on Climate rally
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse at Forward on Climate rally
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse at Forward on Climate rally. (Photo by Jack McDaid.)

The Supreme Court dealt a blow to Obamacare today when it ruled the government can’t force companies to pay for contraceptive coverage if it violates the owners religious sensibilities.

Rhode Island Senator Sheldon Whitehouse said the so-called Hobby Lobby decision is another in a long line of pro-corporate rulings from the high court.

In a statement, he said:

This is just the latest example of the activist Roberts Court siding with the narrow interests of corporations over those of the American people.  Ignoring the clear will of Congress, the Court’s five conservative justices today ruled that corporations have religious beliefs that they can put ahead of the medical well-being of the women who work for them.  The decision sets a dangerous precedent by allowing for-profit corporations to meddle in decisions that should be left between a woman and her doctor, and I’m deeply disappointed in the Court’s ruling.  It follows an increasingly predictable pattern of five activist, conservative Supreme Court justices deciding in 5-4 decisions that the Constitution and our laws mean whatever the Republican Party and big corporations want them to mean

Why felons can run for office, Buddy Cianci edition


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

obey buddyBuddy Cianci, the 73-year-old former mayor can probably think of no better way to go out than dying on a Kennedy Plaza throne and being brought down to Waterfire on a shield. Many people thought they have seen the last of him following five years in prison, but I’m pleased he is eligible to run for office regardless of his criminal history.

Buddy’s political career couldn’t be defeated after his first conviction, when some legal and political wrangling got the law bent for him to get back in office. His first conviction was, in some ways, like many others in Rhode Island: a guy loses his temper and gets violent.  Whatever the true details, it had nothing to do with his mayoral duties or ability to run the city. Nobody but a Buddy Cianci, surrounded by a political machine, could possibly have gotten reelected for office after being sentenced to five years felony probation in 1984. In fact, a constitutional amendment was passed just a year later- amending the lifetime ban down to one where Cianci would need to wait three years after completing his probation.

In 1990, Cianci’s machine returned to power. A court even ruled that the three-year wait didn’t apply to people convicted prior to 1985.  His criminal history, however, did not influence his political views. He didn’t push for new policies that took a rehabilitative approach to social problems. Many mayors do not, and typical to the position the Providence Police served their role in responding to the social dilemmas we still face, i.e. poverty, substance abuse, unemployment, lack of affordable housing, mental illness, and crumbling public education.  Arrests lead to convictions lead to lifetimes of de-citizenship for those other than Buddy Cianci.

In 2005, a group of activists in Rhode Island came together to promote a more inclusive democracy and expand voting rights to people on probation and parole. This was especially important as Rhode Island disenfranchised people of color at higher numbers than the Deep South and is a national leader in lengthy probation sentences. Tens of thousands of Rhode Islanders lived and worked in the state, raising children, being good neighbors, yet could not take part in the democracy.

Buddy was not quite yesterday’s news in 2006, when the final proposals were being crafted. He had been indicted in 2001 after “Operation Plunderdome” exposed a classic political kickback scheme. He was amidst his five-year federal prison sentence for racketeering when we drafted the constitutional amendment regarding voting rights – and we considered the right to run for office as well. Based on some people’s well-founded concerns, and the need to avoid a “Buddy” debate, the limitation on running for office was left in place. Back then we just wanted to vote, and none of us wanted to be a politician anyway.

The three-year post-sentence ban ensured that Buddy would be ineligible for the last mayoral race. People expected that to be the end of him. After all, he wouldn’t be eligible for another mayoral run until he was 73. Who even makes it to 73?

The most fundamental aspect of a democracy is the right for a community to choose its own leaders. Eligibility requirements, such as residency for instance, should be limited to things ensuring that a person truly is a representative of the constituency. It may make sense to create policies that bar people with particular criminal histories from being barred from specific occupations. We do this all the time, and it is only the blanket bans that push the bounds of legitimacy and legality (well framed by the EEOC guidelines on employment for people with criminal convictions).

The poetic irony of those up in arms over Buddy’s eligibility is the fact that tens of thousands of Providence residents also have felony convictions. A significant percentage of children in Providence schools have a parent in prison, on probation, parole, or long since moved on from that past. Walk into any business and there is a good chance that someone with a conviction history is working there. They are cooking your food, fixing your vehicle, selling you products, and every other imaginable thing. Buddy did not take up the mantle for the challenges of other folks with conviction histories, thus he is not “representative” in that regard – but at this point we are all so intertwined that, generally, the conviction itself is irrelevant as to one being a good or bad person for the job.

People are free to elect bad leaders. Employers are also free to give people second chances. I confess to having never listened to Buddy Cianci’s radio show since his release from prison, nor have I tried his pasta sauce. He very well may be an out-of-touch old man who would surround himself with cronies, and the children of former cronies. He may paralyze the city, as it expends half its resources trying to be sure he doesn’t corruptly exploit the other half.

The city had over a decade to create a policy that barred people convicted for malfeasance in office for getting that same job back. Look to Cicilline, Lombardi, Taveras, Solomon and the like regarding that issue. It was really that simple and, who knows: perhaps there is still time?

I know first hand that people change. Some change through prison, others just pass adolescence, mourn the passing of a loved one, spend time in quite meditation, or any of the myriad ways we grow as human beings. Some people may not even want a “changed” Buddy as mayor; in fact, they want the same guy back in office.  Either way, views on the integrity of every candidate belong in the campaign.

In the end, his eligibility is just like freedom of speech: I may not like what you say, but I’ll defend your right to say it.

Sunshine and methane pipeline expansion


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Exploding gas pipeline

A recent post congratulated our RI Governor Linc Chafee, who won an award for “exceptional destruction” and “his support of the Spectra fracked gas pipeline expansion and the natural gas industry as a whole.”  NOPE, the grass roots-Green party coalition to stop natural gas pipeline expansion, seems to have been onto something in its act of gubernatorial recognition.

Let’s see what happened since.  Let sunlight disinfect!

Exploding gas pipeline
Toast: from New England Governors & the meth industry with love!

CLF, the Conservation Law Foundation, published documents obtained by means of a Freedom of Information Act request.  The documents show that the New England States Committee on Electricity (NESCOE) and the representatives of the NE governors have tried hard to avoid a transparent process and have put in place a massive infrastructure initiative that gambles not only with tax payer funds but with the global climate in its totality.  The following sums it all up:

In January, the New England Governors announced a regional infrastructure plan to finance new gas pipelines and electric transmission lines with billions of dollars in funding from residents and businesses. Documents obtained by CLF through public records requests show:

  • Details worked out “behind closed doors.” The states and the agency in charge of implementing the Governors’ plan – the New England States Committee on Electricity (NESCOE) – are deciding on the elements, scale, and costs of the plan in secret and have repeatedly shielded technical and legal analysis regarding the plan from public scrutiny.
  • Self-interested industry insiders shaping the plan outside public view. NESCOE and state representatives have been and are currently working out many of the most important details of the plan in private discussions with gas pipeline companies and the gas and electric utilities that would earn billions from the plan. The states are using talking points directly from industry and allowing electric and gas utilities to help define their roles as middlemen who stand to profit from the plan .
  • Ignoring smaller , more affordable solutions. Despite public statements to the contrary, NESCOE and the states agree in private that they “ are not looking for market adjustments as alternatives to our current infrastructure investment path” that could be far less costly. According to the executive in charge of the region’s electric grid, the point of the plan is to use public money to “ overbuild ” gas pipeline.
  • NESCOE claims that it is not subject to public records laws and is refusing to provide any documents to CLF. Several states also are withholding their documents about the plan. CLF is considering legal action to force compliance and bring these document to light.

The dedicated reader may follow this link to learn more about the details.  A document that reveals NOSCOE’s own, detailed summary of its stunning ignorance is here.

Finally, it should be reiterated that supporting decisions without understanding the details now seems to be the strategy of choice of the representatives of the Corporate States of America.

Jorge Elorza says he wants to be mayor for working families


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

jorge elorzaJorge Elorza, a 38-year-old former housing court judge and faculty member at Roger Williams University, may be short of political experience as he bids to become the next mayor of Providence, but he’s long on life experiences. I asked him how he got involved in politics, and he told me a story of childhood friend’s murder, and leaving a Wall Street job fresh out of the University of Rhode Island.

Elorza is full of such amazing stories. His parents were undocumented workers who crossed the border illegally from Guatemala. His father decided to come to the United States after being approached by Guatemalan guerrillas during political unrest of the mid-1970’s.

He speaks fondly of his hardscrabble upbringing on Cranston Street, on Providence’s West Side.

Elorza is a longtime Angel Taveras supporter – he worked on the current mayor’s first campaign for congress and briefly as Taveras ran for mayor. When he was first approached about the idea, Elorza said he was initially uninterested in running for mayor but eventually decided it was a great way to help the community.

We talked a lot about education policy, and Elorza’s idea to keep schools open through the summer and restructuring them to be more akin to community centers.

In some regards, Elorza would mimic Mayor Taveras on education policy. Though Elorza said he wouldn’t have fired the teachers as Taveras did.

Elorza is on the board of directors of Achievement First, and spoke highly of the effect charter schools can have on traditional public schools.

Forget Buddy Cianci, I wanted to know how an Elorza administration would be different than a Smiley administration. I asked him about their differences.

I asked him about the biggest issue for Providence? Of course he said, education and the economy, but he reiterated what he said at his announcement. “I’m running for mayor for one reason: because I want Providence to be a place where working families can succeed.”

“Sometimes I truly believe that we all just don’t interact enough to know that we all want the exact same thing, we want better schools, we all want a stronger economy and we want safe and vibrant neighborhoods,” Elorza said when we were talking about working together.

Smiley vs. Cianci: a bully meets his match on the political playground


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

RI Future PicFormer Providence mayor, Vincent A. Cianci, is a bully. He is not “just what Rhode Island’s capital city needs.” He is not the man who “never stopped caring about Providence.” He is an indomitable ego with a history and a talent for prioritizing power over people and results over integrity.

“I challenge Mr. Cianci to a debate,” said Democratic mayoral candidate, Brett Smiley, “at the time and place of his choosing — on questions of ethics, government accountability, and the cost of corruption to our city’s reputation and economy. We are still recovering from the damage inflicted by the widespread and systematic corruption that defined Buddy Cianci’s tenure as mayor.” A debate is not an unreasonable request among political candidates in a land that calls itself a democracy. It is a civilized discussion between individuals who seek the same office, but hold different opinions on how to perform the job. By leveling the playing field and offering a public forum in which to support their respective claims, a civil discourse can be staged to allow the people to determine which man or woman best suits the values and abilities of the future that the majority of the people want. Smiley even offered to give Cianci home-field advantage by allowing Cianci to choose both the time and place.

But bullies of the Cianci variety are rattled by having to relinquish even the slightest control. Their egos overpower their capacity to reason when they, themselves, do not call the plays.  Possibly best represented by RIPR’s political reporter Ian Donnis, in a now classic Cianci story, Donnis, at the time reporting for the Phoenix, had scheduled an interview with then mayor Cianci on two topics: the mall and police. Cianci flew into an unwarranted rage, pounding the desk and crying that his staff had approved only one question and, “I’m the one who sets the rules here, not you!” He then proceeded to discuss the second question to Donnis’s satisfaction. This typifies the Cianci-style bully. The first time I heard Donnis tell this story, he went on to discuss an unprompted anecdote about Cianci’s show of force against the unionized sanitation workers by hiring private workers to break the ranks and placing shotgun-wielding police on the trucks to protect the scabs. “What the unions didn’t know was that the guns weren’t loaded.”

I know something about bullies. Growing up, I was always the small-framed, intellectual child. I was picked on. I was sensitive. I was artistic. I was the stereotypical victim for the stereotypical bully. Maybe it was just to make those like us feel better about ourselves or maybe, at the time, people actually believed the explanation that bullies were really more insecure than any of us and acted out as a means of overcompensating for their own, perceived insufficiencies. Now, however, studies have shown this not to be the case. According to Jaana Juven, a professor of developmental psychology at UCLA and an expert on bullying, “Most bullies have almost ridiculously high levels of self-esteem.” Furthermore, they are often viewed by their peers, not as pariahs, but rather as popular, effective and untouchable.

But what I learned growing up was that the best way to shake up a bully is to steal his or her feeling of control. Don’t back down. Call the person out. Steal his or her spotlight by turning the tables of his or her audience.

And that is exactly what Brett Smiley did. Brett called him out to the metaphoric schoolyard on the very issue that is the foremost concern of anyone who considers Cianci a viable candidate: ethics, government accountability, and corruption. And, predictably, Cianci responded by taking a cheap shot at Smiley’s late father in law by making a disparaging joke with regard to Brett’s husband’s father being part owner of a locally well known exotic dance nightclub. Brett’s husband, James DeRentis, for the record, is one of the most generous, kind, talented and intelligent people I know. For Cianci to make a mean joke about the late father of the spouse of a political opponent as a response to a request for political debate shows that there are still few moral levels to which Cianci will not sink. Brett asked for a civilized discussion and Cianci made the circumstantial equivalent to a “your momma’” joke.

Ethics, government accountability, and corruption. According to the Brown Daily Herald, “Patronage, bribes and city employees being required to buy tickets to Cianci fundraisers were all investigated, leading to the indictment of 24 city officials and the jailing of 19, including several top Cianci aides.” But Cianci has the gall to try and insinuate that Brett’s late father in law’s partnership in an exotic dance nightclub somehow equates to multiple felony convictions for criminal acts while in the office Cianci held when convicted.

Cianci won’t stoop to debating a Democratic primary candidate. This is the same cowardly style he uses on his radio show guests: charm them until they leave the studio and then take cheap shots when they can’t swing back. I deviated from his audience-demographic of “get off my lawn! Kid’s these days … when I was young!” crowd to tune in to his talk radio program a few times. I know how he operates. There is a part of me that’s relieved that he won’t have to be torn apart in a public forum by someone who can actually separate the facts from the fiction and the myth from the man who still rubs the sore spots where the handcuffs rubbed his wrists.

I will fully disclose that I help with Brett Smiley’s campaign. I work with Brett because he is, without a doubt, one of the most honest, authentic and genuine people I have ever met. Brett wants to win. But he would rather lose with integrity that win dishonorably. Brett lives his truth. My job is to promote him as a candidate. But I would lay down in traffic for him as a person. He inspires me. I work with a number of elected officials and candidates for office. But none have taught me as much about uncompromising ethics within politics as Brett Smiley. Yes, he’s “the man with a plan.” But, as much as I am invested in what he plans to do, I am even more inspired by why he plans to do it. He loves this city. He wants to make everyone love it as much as he does and he just happens to be skilled and driven enough to do it … honestly. For the record, neither he, nor his campaign, solicited me in any way to write this. In fact, I may incur some repercussions for “going rogue.” But, had Cianci not taken such a cheap shot at a man in whom I believe, and his family. I would not have penned a word.

So, the line has been toed. Cianci has been weighed. Cianci has been measured. And, maybe, he’s just plain scared of stepping into the ring with someone so far above his moral weight-class. If I were Cianci, I would be too.

More opportunity than danger for legislative progressives


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

state house lawnFor a state that claims its General Assembly members are too ensconced, there certainly are a lot of legislators running unopposed. More than 44 percent of incumbents will be alone on the ballot.

But in the contested races, there seems to be more opportunity than risk for the progressive caucus in the General Assembly. Here are some of the battlegrounds around Rhode Island where liberal candidates can either pick up a seat or may be in danger.

Providence

The most high profile legislative race pits activist Aaron Regunberg, best known for helping to organize the Providence Student Union, against Heather Tow-Yick, and others. It’s Gordon Fox’s East Side district, and liberals would like to replace the former speaker with a died-in-the-wool progressive such as Regunberg – whose successful effort to suspend the NECAP graduation requirement leaves him with tons of political capital.

Senator Gayle Goldin faces a tough primary challenge from Chris Wall, a local real estate agent as does Rep Maria Cimini by Daniel McKiernan. Rep Scott Slater, District 10, has two primary opponents.

Portsmouth

Linda Finn is the progressive incumbent in House District 72, but two years ago she narrowly beat then-incumbent Republican Dan Reilly. Reilly is well-liked across the isle, but Finn is loved by the left.

Central Falls

Hunger striker, former Peace Corp member and City Councilor Shelby Maldonado is challenging incumbent Rep. Gus Silva. Now that would be quite a voice to add to the House progressive caucus!

Coventry

Republican firebrand Patricia Morgan has bet big on being a thorn in the side of leadership and taking on local firefighters. Now, she’ll face a tough reelection campaign against Nick Denice. He’s a certified fraud inspector. Morgan is a longtime GOP insider with a bad habit of misstating facts and trashing the working class. Also in Knotty Oaker Country, Rep. Scott Guthrie will face Republican Bobby Nardolillo, of the Nardolillo Funeral Home family.

On the senate side, The left’s best chance of gaining a seat in the Senate is with Margaux Morriseau. She’s challenging Coventry Sen. Nick Kettle. Morriseau is best known for leading the charge for payday loan reform, but she is also a leader of the New Leaders Council, and a longtime employee with NeighborWorks Blackstone River Valley. Kettle is best known for creating a fake Facebook page on a State House computer or disparaging homeless people.

North Kingstown

Julie Casimiro, development director at Family Service of Rhode Island, is challenging tea party extremist Doreen Costa. This would be a good swap for the left.

Newport

Rep. Peter Martin, a Democrat and Fifth Ward throwback, faces a tough challenge from environmentalist Lauren Carson.

Which race did we forget to flag? Let us know in the comments below.

Unitarian Universalists come out big in support for fair wages in Rhode Island


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_1193The Unitarian Universalist Association (UUA) is having their annual General assembly in Providence this weekend, and today around noon they held a rally outside the Renaissance Hotel near the State House to support worker’s rights to a fair and just living wage, and to demonstrate against the draconian and anti-democratic tactics used by state officials to stop hotel workers from raising the minimum wage in Providence. Well over two hundred people made the trek from the Convention Center, where the UUA GA is being held, to the empty lot outside the Renaissance to chant, hear speeches and sing for economic and social justice.

Pastor Santiago Rodriguez, of the Gloria Dei Lutheran Church located between the Providence Place Mall and the Renaissance Hotel, emceed the event, introducing speakers and leading the crowd in chants of “Show Your Love to the Workers” and “Fair Wages.”

Also speaking was local legend Yilenny Ferreras, hotel worker and one of the four hunger strikers who shamed the Rhode Island legislature into making a small gesture of raising the minimum wage in the state to $9. Her speeches are full of fire, and her story resonated with the crowd.

Reverend James Ford of the First Unitarian Church in Providence and Reverend Ellen Quaadgras of the Westminster Unitarian Church in East Greenwich spoke next. It was under the leadership of Ford that the UUA General assembly made the difficult decision to boycott the 850 rooms they had originally asked for at the Renaissance. Given the hotel’s refusal to fairly engage with its employees over union and salary, plus its loss of LGBTQ friendly TAG Approved status, it would have been hypocritical to do any less. Still, 850 rooms were a lot to make up for, and the UUA GA had to scramble to find adequate lodging for all their attendees.

Speaking next was B Doubour, a fast food worker at Wendy’s who spoke of the difficulty she has paying bills and supporting her kids on the minimum wages the company pays.

Lauren Jacobs, National Organizing Director for Restaurant Opportunities Centers United spoke next, reminding the audience that the real minimum wage in Rhode Island is not $8, it’s $2.89. That’s what tipped workers in Rhode Island are entitled to. Often, their checks from the company they work for are for $0 after taxes are taken out. “Do you know what they call a worker who works for free?” Jacobs asked. “A slave!” answered the crowd.

The Rev. Amy Carol Webb, Musician and Minister at River of Grass UU Congregation in Ft. Lauderdale then lead the crowd in a song.

Rabbi Jonathan Klein, Executive Director of Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice in Los Angeles spoke next about the need for organizing around social justice issues. He hopes Rhode Islanders can get past difference is race, class and union divides to work together for a fair living wage for everyone.

Donald Anderson, of the RI Council of Churches, told the crowd that his group fully supported the efforts of workers in Rhode Island to earn a living wage.

After the speakers were finished Jesse Strecker, Executive Director of Rhode Island Jobs With Justice asked the crowd to follow Pastor Santiago Rodriguez into the hotel to speak with Renaissance Hotel Manager Angelo DePeri about an employee who faces termination due to their involvement with the unionization effort. As the crowd moved from the field to the parking lot, Providence Police and hotel security intercepted telling the leaders that the hotel, a public building receiving over a million dollars in tax breaks from the City of Providence every year, was not letting anyone from the crowd inside. In fact, DePeri was not interested in meeting even one person from the crowd as a representative.

The fact is, good and moral people want fair wages for all workers. The battle for economic justice has begun.

DSC_1091

DSC_1122

DSC_1127
Rev. Donald Anderson

DSC_1128

DSC_1131

DSC_1134

DSC_1143

DSC_1150

DSC_1151

DSC_1169
Yilenny Ferreras

DSC_1185

DSC_1217

DSC_1241

DSC_1250
Rev. James Ford

DSC_1267

DSC_1271

DSC_1280

DSC_1287

DSC_1289

DSC_1292

DSC_1297
Rev. Ellen Quaadgras
DSC_1317
Pastor Santiago Rodriguez
DSC_1341
B Doubour, Wendy’s worker
DSC_1386
Lauren Jacobs, National Organizing Director, Restaurant Opportunities Centers United

DSC_1393

DSC_1399
Rev. Amy Carol Webb

DSC_1406

DSC_1409

DSC_1410

DSC_1416

DSC_1434
Rabbi Jonathan Klein, Executive Director, Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice

DSC_1445

DSC_1485
Jesse Strecker, Executive Director, Rhode Island Jobs With Justice
DSC_1503
Confronted by hotel security

DSC_1516

DSC_1521

DSC_1525

DSC_1526

DSC_1530

DSC_1540

DSC_1547

DSC_1548

All pictures and video above are available for use under the Creative Commons license. Please use them far and wide.

(cc) 2014 Steve Ahlquist

NBC10 Wingmen: Bell and Morse spar on Cianci


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

bell wingmenCan Buddy Cianci really win an election, or will he simply garner a lot of media attention? Sam Bell, of the Rhode Island Progressive Democrats, and Andrew Morse, of Anchor Rising, tackle these questions with Bill Rappleye on NBC 10 Wingmen this week.

“Don’t underestimate the importance of the Democratic primary,” said Bell in closing. “We’re going to have a fresh face and someone who can beat Cianci.”

News, Weather and Classifieds for Southern New England

Climate change and human extinction at URI


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Guy McPherson gave a talk Climate Change — The End? at URI on April 12 of this year. The first part of his provocative presentation is now available as an annotated video, put together by Robert Malin.

This sums up the main points of this installment:

  • Earth is headed for a temperature increase exceeding 3.5C (6.3F) above baseline, the average global temperature at the beginning of the industrial revolution.
  • There have never been humans on Earth in that temperature range.
  • Human extinction will result and come about as a result of absence of habitat.
  • The main-stream media and governments are complicit in covering up decades worth of scientific research and predictions.

My view on climate change is: “The 1% will survive climate change just fine. Thank you.”  How much does the thought cheer you up that Guy might be wrong and that I might be right?

Stay tuned!

Nurses to Women & Infants Hospital: stop hiring scabs (‘travel nurses’)


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_0636An all day picket was held at Women & Infants Hospital yesterday to call attention to the problem of temporary, out-of-state “travel nurses” filling scheduling holes than hiring in-state nurses graduating from one of the many fine colleges offering nursing degrees in Rhode Island.

“There are many qualified graduates from our numerous nursing programs looking for jobs,” said Patrick Quinn, executive vice president of 1199 SEIU New England, “so it baffles me that Care New England management would take advantage of all the tax breaks of a non-profit but not give back to the community when we have such a high unemployment crisis.”

Care New England is the company presently managing Women & Infants.

Hiring travel nurses means that the salaries leave the state when the nurses are done. There are no savings in terms of wages as travel nurses make two and three times the standard rate of pay. Further, all full-time permanent nurses are given weeks of in house training and orientation that the temporary travel nurses skip. They are simply plugged into scheduling holes without any real orientation or training in hospital specific policies. This creates even more work for the regular staff, who spend time correcting the mistakes of the travel nurses.

Given these issues, why use travel nurses? To avoid hiring more union workers, of course.

This is just another example of a company engaging in dangerous, impractical strategies to avoid treating workers with respect and dignity. Even as the ACA funnels millions of new dollars into the health care industry, private companies, eager to squeeze ever more profits for their shareholders and overpaid CEOs, take shortcuts at the expense of their staff and patients.

My wife and I went to Women and Infants over 20 years ago to have our three children. The experience was top notch, and the nurses were fabulous. To think that the new management might threaten the reputation of such a fine hospital by playing games with the quality of the staff is appalling. As Wendy Laprade, a Registered Nurse in the Labor and Delivery Room said, “Women & Infants… will only remain the premier women’s hospital in Southern New England if we hire and train the next generation of RN’s.”

With all the talk surrounding a new nursing school being built in Rhode Island, and knowing that there will be a huge demand for nurses as the population ages over the next decade, Care New England’s policy decisions seem extremely short-sighted and counterproductive. Currently there are 30-35 traveling nurses estimated to be working at Women & Infants. This Pro Publica piece from 2009 highlights some of the dangers these policies exacerbate.

Supporting the union effort at Women & Infants were several other unions, as well as gubernatorial candidate Clay Pell and many other candidates for office. Also out in full support of the union’s efforts were three of the four hunger strikers, Shelby Maldonado, Mirjaam Parada and Yilenny Ferrares, and other hotel workers who worked so hard for a living wage in Providence, only to be cut down by backroom dealings in the General Assembly.

Quinn
Patrick Quinn, 1199 SEIU

nurses

pell nurse
Clay Pell

DSC_0672

DSC_0687

DSC_0688

DSC_0705

DSC_0717

DSC_0720

DSC_0725

DSC_0738

DSC_0748

DSC_0762

DSC_0767

DSC_0782

DSC_0788

DSC_0800

DSC_0813

DSC_0835

DSC_0838

DSC_0848

DSC_0872
Seth Magaziner
DSC_0899
Guillaume de Ramel
DSC_0904
Frank Caprio
DSC_0916
George Nee, AFL-CIO RI
Stan Israel
Stan Israel, retired SEIU 1199 organizer

DSC_0931

DSC_0937
Shelby Maldonado, former hunger striker
DSC_0938
Mirjaam Parada, former hunger striker
DSC_0947
State Rep. Frank Ferri

DSC_0952

DSC_0955

DSC_0956

DSC_0958
Maureen Martin

DSC_0962

DSC_0968
Aaron Regunberg
DSC_0972
State Rep. David Bennett
DSC_0975
Yilenny Ferrares, former hunger striker

DSC_0981

“Criminal Street Gang” legislation is the wrong direction for Rhode Island


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Hudson Police Department Holding CellWell meaning but dangerously inept legislation has a bad habit of passing in the General Assembly in the eleventh hour and this year is no exception as both the House and the Senate passed an amendment to the general laws that adds “up to ten years of extra jail time for any person convicted of a felony (which now includes a third offense of graffiti), if that person is subjectively determined to be part of a ‘criminal street gang,’ or three or more people who have an identifiable sign, color, or symbol.”

The actual language of the bill defines membership in a street gang subjectively, giving judges and juries wide latitude in determining membership, which might entail an additional decade of jail time:

Criminal street gang” means an ongoing organization, association, or group of three (3) or more persons, whether formal or informal, having as one of its primary activities the commission of criminal or delinquent acts; having an identifiable name or common identifiable signs, colors or symbols; and whose members individually or collectively engage in or have engaged in a pattern of criminal gang activity.

Further, one does not have to be a member of the “street gang” for these penalties to apply. “Any person” convicted of a felony  that is “ knowingly committed for the benefit, at the direction of, or in association with any criminal street gang or criminal street gang member” can be subject to these increased penalties. The ACLU concludes that “As a result, the bill’s greatest impact could be on young people coerced into engaging in criminal conduct on behalf of a gang.”

This bill does nothing to reduce the number of young people who voluntarily join or are coerced into joining a gang. It’s hard to imagine a kid, aged 12-17, being dissuaded from gang violence because of this legislation. All this legislation does is further criminalize the difficult lives of urban youth, predominantly youth of color. This bill was part of a package of bills coming out of Attorney General Peter Kilmartin’s office and the subjective nature of the definition used in determining gang membership will certainly lead to abuse at the hands of state prosecutors.

We don’t need more penalties. We need more intervention. Too often the General Assembly tackles a problem through expensive, wasteful and dehumanizing incarceration rather than through humanistic intercession.

We can be better than this legislation. We can tackle the problem of gangs and gang violence without destroying lives in our most vulnerable communities.

I am urging Governor Chafee to veto this legislation, so that the General Assembly can go back to the drawing board and craft an appropriate response to the problems of gang violence. Please join me in sending a clear message to the Governor and our legislators. We want legislation that helps, not hurts, our kids.

Call him:
(401) 222-2080

Email him:
governor@governor.ri.gov

Annoy him on Twitter:
@LincolnChafee
@ChafeeNews

Hotel worker interviews are required reading


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Santa Brito

Though the first round of the Fight for a $15 minimum wage appears to be over, due to the anti-democratic efforts of a right-wing General Assembly more concerned with feathering the beds of the rich and entitled than easing the burden of the poor and disenfranchised, the hotel workers targeted by the Mattiello budget are not going away or shutting up. A pair of interviews over at Bluestockings Magazine, a Brown University based publication writing “about issues from a gender aware perspective” has given voice to hotel workers Santa Brito and Miguelina Almanazar.

Both have been vocal leaders in the fight for fair and decent wages, and their interviews need to be more widely read.

Miguelina Almanazar

When asked about the General Assembly’s pre-emptive move to prevent the hotel workers from achieving a $15 minimum wage, Almanazar said, “The truth is, we were expecting it because this is what the state and the state politicians always do. Whenever we’re asking for something, they always take the side of the rich. When we’re entering bankruptcy, they raise the taxes on our houses. When something is wrong, the minority has to pay for that. They never want to invest in the minority. They never want to invest in poor people, and that is what we are. So the truth is, we were expecting it, and so it doesn’t have us down. We are going to keep fighting it, and we are going to change the law.

Santa Brito, who once said that “House leadership is moving to jail us in poverty” is at her direct and uncompromising best, saying, “The truth is, I’m really mad, because these are people that are supposed to be providing for us, and in fact what they’re doing is denying us opportunity when we’re just trying to provide for ourselves. We’ve taken it upon ourselves to provide for our families and now they’re just trying to block us. And, the truth is, that if they don’t do their job and provide for us, then we are going to have no other option but to take to the streets to try and reclaim the rights they are trying to take from us.”

These are important interviews from important Rhode Island women that deserve the widest possible audience.

Pride: We decided to refuse the shame


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

RI-PRIDEGay Pride’s origins lie in protest, not celebration. And to this day, defiance is core to what Gay Pride is all about.

The first Gay Pride march took place in the West Village in New York City on the first anniversary of the Stonewall Uprising. It was a taking-back-the-streets action against a world in which the gay communities had been abused, bullied, isolated, marginalized and oppressed. Stonewall was a declaration of war against oppression. It will be nice when Gay Pride is a victory march, but we are far from there yet.

It wasn’t pride back then. Gay people needed to know their place and keep their heads down if they wanted any measure of safety. Being gay was understood to be a matter of shame. The very fact of our existence was an offense against the public order ─ and remains so today in much of the world. So our part of the existing social contract was to avoid giving offense by remaining invisible. By definition, gay life existed in a demi-monde.

Because gay life centered on families of choice, and the families’ living rooms were the gay bars, these places reflected the marginalization of their inhabitants: seedy, tawdry. Stonewall Tavern was mob-run, not surprisingly. Even the mob disliked being associated with the gay world, but not so much as to refuse our money. Politicians made headlines by periodically attacking these homes, with inspectors and vice squads and the police, destroying lives and careers but making political hay among the nice people.

It’s Pride because with the uprising we decided to refuse the shame. The world turned upside-down. We’re here and we’re queer. Instead of hiding, we would parade. Instead of the seedy and tawdry, we would dress up in rainbows and sparkles. Straight parades have cheerleaders and majorettes in skimpy outfits twirling rifles. Our parade has skimpy outfits, but they’re Speedos. Our cheerleaders are drag queens. People get offended. But they always were.

We won’t take it anymore. We want our homes, our families, our safety, our lives and our loves. Just like everybody else. No more shame. Pride.

“We won’t die secret deaths anymore. . . . We will be citizens. The time has come”

– Prior Walter, Angels in America

Bell Street understands pride, and Pride. Join us at the June 21st Rhode Island PrideFest in Providence, at dusk.

– Brian Kovacs

RI delegation weighs in on situation in Iraq


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

reed burnettAs President Obama prepares to deploy some 300 “military advisers” to Iraq in hopes of quelling the Sunni-led violence there, Rhode Island’s congressional delegation is mixed on the move.

Senator Jack Reed and Congressman Jim Langevin said they support the president’s decision. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse said he will “cautiously support” the president’s decision. Congressman David Cicilline, on the other hand, said he would “continue to urge the Obama Administration to proceed cautiously.”

Each offered a detailed statement to RI Future about the escalating strife in Iraq. Assuming the progressive position is opposing war and violence, here are their statements in order of how opposed they seemed to me based on their statements alone:

Congressman David Cicilline:

I am very concerned about the implications of any new U.S. military engagement in Iraq and strongly oppose sending American combat forces to this country.

The resolution of the current crisis in Iraq is ultimately the obligation of the Iraqi people. Their leaders have the responsibility to establish a pluralistic and inclusive government that will provide stability in Iraq. America has spent more than $1.7 trillion and sacrificed 4,486 American lives in this terrible war.  After nearly a decade of war in Iraq, Rhode Islanders and most Americans think it’s time to focus on nation building right here in America.  I will continue to closely monitor this situation and continue to urge the Obama Administration to proceed cautiously.

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse:

I will cautiously support the Administration’s efforts to help Iraqis regain control of their territory. This insurgency could become a real threat to our interests and we need to find ways to support the Iraqis who seek a peaceful democracy.  But that should not mean sending American troops into combat.  The Iraqi government needs to include all its citizens – not just the Shiite majority – in their democracy if they wish it to last.

Congressman Jim Langevin:

The violence in Iraq is very disturbing, and it is something we must monitor closely. Like the President, I am opposed to sending any new combat troops into the area, but I respect and agree with his decision to provide additional security to the United States embassy in Baghdad and Special Operations advisors to better assess the situation on the ground. Going forward, we must continue to explore all of our options as the situation develops. However, U.S. actions must not be in any way a substitute for meaningful action on the part of the Iraqi government to mend the rifts between Sunni, Shi’a, and Kurdish leaders.

Senator Jack Reed:

Iraq represents a very difficult situation.  The U.S. needs to be vigilant when it comes to ISIS, which is so ruthless that even Al Qaeda disavows it, and we obviously need to protect our diplomatic personnel and other assets.  But the responsibility to maintain the security and stability of Iraq belongs to the Iraqi government.  We can’t be their air force and U.S. combat troops are not the solution.  Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has so far managed to politicize Iraq’s military and militarize its politics, a dangerous approach that will only breed more instability.  To even begin to solve this conflict, Maliki must make serious political reforms to build an inclusive and stable Iraq.  This country’s future must be decided by every segment of its society, not just by certain groups, and certainly not by the United States.

Reed also spoke with CNN’s Erin Burnett Wednesday about the issue.

Hunger strikers helped win $9 minimum wage for all


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
DSC_0429
Hunger Strikers hear that Governor Chafee signed the budget.

With  a stroke of his pen Governor Chafee signed into law the 2015 budget, marking what House Speaker Nick Mattiello endlessly referred  to as a new era in regional “competitiveness” for Rhode Island. Simultaneously the Governor dashed the hopes of Providence hotel workers who were cavalierly targeted by a measure inserted into the bill that eliminated the ability of cities and towns in the state from deciding their own minimum wages.

DSC_0320
Governor Chafee

While the governor, Senate President Paiva-Weed and the Speaker were inside the State House giving self-congratulatory speeches about the bold new budget and the bold new economic direction the state was taking, outside the State House Mirjaam Parada, Yilenny Ferrares, Santa Brito and Shelby Maldonado continued their hunger strike, hoping to convince the governor to veto.

DSC_0354
House Speaker Mattiello

Were the efforts of the hotel workers and the hunger strikers ultimately futile? I think not. Both houses of the General Assembly just passed a bill to raise the minimum wage to $9 in 2015. Given the priorities of the Mattiello House this year, in which lowering estate and corporate taxes was seen as more important than helping the economically vulnerable, and given the open hostility some legislators had evinced towards the idea of raising the minimum wage so soon after the last increase, the $9 minimum wage is an important victory.

It was only the efforts of the hotel workers and the hunger strikers that shamed members of the General Assembly into doing something akin to the right thing for minimum wage workers. In fact, I heard rumors yesterday that the only way the Senate would approve Mattiello’s corporate kiss-up budget was for the Speaker to see his way clear to a slight increase in the minimum wage, but of course the exact mechanisms by which the legislature conducts its business are always hidden from public view.

DSC_0387
Senate President Paiva-Weed

Even as the Mattiello budget was signed into law and the $9 minimum wage was passed in Rhode Island, the Massachusetts legislature, in a move lauded by President Obama, acted to raise its state’s minimum wage to $11 an hour. (Note to Rhode Islanders: This is how real Democrats behave.) For all of Speaker Mattiello’s talk of being regionally competitive, the failure to set our state’s minimum wage to a similar standard demonstrates a lack of economic understanding and leadership. Following the economic logic on evidence at the State House, one should now expect the best minimum wage workers in Pawtucket and East Providence to cross the border into Massachusetts for the $11 an hour fast food jobs, leaving the $9 jobs here in Rhode Island to the second tier workers. The extra $80 a week will be worth the extra five to ten minutes it will take to get to work in the morning for most workers.

Budget architect Ray Gallison
Budget architect Ray Gallison

The hotel workers here in Providence were fighting for $15. They fought and won here in the city, only to have the state come in and snatch victory from their grasp. At that point, the fight switched from a battle for fair wages to a battle for access to democracy. It was only the efforts of the hunger strikers and their supporters, calling attention to the miscarriage of justice and the abuse of legislative power, that shamed the General Assembly into doing anything to alleviate the suffering of the most economically vulnerable.

Mirjaam Parada, Yilenny Ferrares, Santa Brito and Shelby Maldonado are heroes of democracy, bravely showing the way forward in the fight for economic justice in Rhode Island. But more than that, they are just good, kindhearted people, putting the concerns of others ahead of their own. I am better for knowing them, and glad there are such people working to make the world a better place.

Their hunger strike is over, and I can’t wait to see what they’ll come up with next.

DSC_0288

Seth Magaziner: only real Democrat in the treasurer’s race


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Seth Magaziner - the only TRUE Democrat running for General Treasurer
Seth Magaziner – the only TRUE Democrat running for General Treasurer

The Rhode Island Democratic State Convention will take place on Sunday, June 22. My wife Cathy and I are both State Committee members so both of us will be there and voting for the candidates our town committee, the Charlestown Democrats, have endorsed.

For General Treasurer, we like Seth Magaziner because he has a record of success as an investor and fresh ideas for how to get Rhode Island’s economy growing again. Plus, we think he’s a helluva guy. South County residents can find that out for themselves this Saturday when he comes to the Charlestown Gallery for a fund-raiser party being hosted by friends and supporters. Please bring your checkbook.

As if all of Seth’s positive qualities weren’t enough, Cathy and I would still be voting for him at the State Convention because he is, in our opinion, the only actual Democrat among the three candidates running for the state party endorsement.

His two opponents are former General Treasurer and failed candidate for Governor Frank Caprio and former RI Auditor General Ernie Almonte. Neither Caprio nor Almonte are real Democrats, and I don’t simply mean they aren’t our particular brand of Democrat, which is the progressive variety. Nor are they qualified to be General Treasurer.

Frank Caprio

Frank Caprio, you may recall, ran for Governor in 2010 and came in third because he ran one of the most awful campaigns in Rhode Island history. His biggest headlines came when he told the President of the United States to take his endorsement and “shove it.” Right after his crushing defeat, Caprio actually disaffiliated from the Democratic Party.

Frank Caprio’s term as General Treasurer (2006-2010) was blissful on the surface despite the national economic crash that wrecked the Rhode Island economy and trashed its public pension funds. He kept reassuring us there was no cause for alarm and that he was juggling the state’s portfolio to keep our pension funds solvent. What he failed to do was insist, as was his job, that the General Assembly keep its promises to deposit money in the pension funds as they were required to do.

Caprio only discovered that the pension funds were in trouble as he was leaving office and gearing up for his run for Governor. He then took a sharp turn to the right and used public workers as the scapegoats. He even openly shopped himself to the Republican Party in 2009 before deciding to run for Governor as a Democrat

Though he easily won the party endorsement and primary, the Caprio campaign came off the rails. Caprio couldn’t figure out whether he needed to go further to the right to counter the Republican John Robitaille and Moderate Party Ken Block, or try to tack left to counter then-independent Lincoln Chafee who had gathered support from most of the traditional Democratic base.

For all practical purposes, the end came for Caprio’s campaign when he got into a fight with President Obama over Obama’s reluctance to endorse him over his long-time friend Lincoln Chafee. Caprio actually told the President to “take his endorsement and shove it.

In 2012, apparently after stewing about his defeat for two years, Caprio disaffiliated from the Democratic Party, changing his voter registration to “unaffiliated.” In May 2013, after either deciding or being talked into it, Caprio announced his bid to run for another term as General Treasurer. However, it took until October for Caprio to say he would be doing so as a Democrat.

However, I would like to actual see his current voter registration card, just to be sure.

Since declaring for his old job, Caprio has been spinning some revisionist history about what a great job he did last time and is trying to find the right non-specific ways to address the on-going issues of public worker pensions and the 38 Studios deal, issues he failed to address in 2010.

Caprio did such a lousy job as General Treasurer that current Treasurer Gina Raimondo noted on her website that Caprio left more 900 victims owed compensation from the state’s Crime Victim’s Compensation Fund hanging.

He’s also trying to paint himself as a regular guy and now spins a yarn about how he grew up in modest circumstances on the outskirts of Federal Hill, twisting his actual history as a son of privilege and wealth due to his famous father Judge Caprio. In this video when asked about income inequality Caprio says, “When it comes to opportunity and equality, my feeling and my experience is that in our society there are no limitations and there is no reason for anybody to feel as though they are being held back.”

As a state committee member, I’ve been getting swamped with letters and e-mails from Caprio, but frankly, after reading all his stuff, I don’t know what he stands for, other than wanting a chance to redeem himself through a return to the Treasurer’s office. To that, I say “shove it.”

Ernie Almonte

The other fake Democrat running for General Treasurer is former Rhode Island Auditor Ernie Almonte. He was the first to declare his candidacy, deciding in 2012 to run for Governor but later changed his mind and switched to General Treasurer when he realized he would get crushed in the primary if he ran for Governor. I doubt he’ll do any better for General Treasurer. He’s one of the nicest people in the race, a pleasure to talk to. He prides himself on his honesty and integrity.

It’s too bad he has made such a big deal about that because there’s ample evidence that he’s lying. The worst evidence of Almonte’s deception is this video of him speaking at a seminar to other accountants in October 2012.

It occured near the end of the Romney challenge to President Obama and Romney’s campaign was floundering because of his gaffes, such as claiming that half of all Americans pay no taxes. Romney’s famous 47% claim was a lie because even if people are too poor to pay federal income tax, they still pay Social Security, Medicare, excise taxes and state and local taxes. Romney’s false claim contributed to his resounding defeat in the 2012 election.

In the video, Ernie Almonte spins out almost exactly the same line as Mitt Romney and doesn’t stop there. He calls for drastic cuts to Medicare and Social Security to cut budget deficits and poo-poos even the thought of raising taxes on the wealthy.

At the time of this videoed presentation, Almonte was a declared candidate for Rhode Island Governor. As a Democrat. Yet, he sounds like Mitt Romney with a Rhode Island accent.

This isn’t the only problem with Almonte. As long-time state Auditor General, it was his job to watch the books and count the money to make sure it was all there. One of his most important functions was monitoring the health of the public pension funds.

I read his audit reports for 2007 through 2010 when he resigned. In not one of these reports does Almonte sound the alarm about the state of public pension funds. He blandly notes the market losses the funds took during the recession but said it could have been worse. The first time the Auditor General sounded the alarm was in the first audit report issued after he left.

I asked Almonte to explain this and he told me that, well, he did testify to say there were problems when he went before some General Assembly committees. Period.

When Almonte met with Charlestown Democrats, he also flunked another key test. He was asked if he had any experience investing large sums of other people’s money, which is one of the main things the General Treasurer must do. He paused for a long time and had no answer other than to say he sat on a couple of boards of groups that had money.

There are other primary races to watch, especially the Governor’s race. But there is special significance to the General Treasurer’s race where only one candidate, Seth Magaziner, is a real Democrat we can trust to do right by the people of Rhode Island.

San Fran’s Archbishop’s decision to speak at anti-LGBTQ rally has Rhode Island roots


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
SJC photo-resized
Archbishop Cordileone

San Francisco Archbishop Cordileone’s decision to speak at the “March for Marriage” an anti-gay marriage rally organized by NOM (National Organization for Marriage) on June 19 has caused quite a stir in Catholic circles. Many are imploring the Archbishop to reconsider his decision to speak at the event, citing Pope Francis’s “Who am I to judge?” attitude towards homosexuality, though it is doubtful that the Pope’s words marked a new understanding in the Catholic Church on the issue.  Cordileone’s willingness to ignore liberal trends in the church and to partner with more extreme anti-gay groups such as the National Organization for Marriage (NOM) should not come as a surprise to those following the Catholic Church’s involvement in the marriage equality battle here in Rhode Island.

Bishop Thomas Tobin trailblazed these efforts over a year ago.

Back in January 2013 I reported that the Providence Diocese made the unfortunate decision to partner with NOM and MassResistance as part of a group calling itself the Faith Alliance to Preserve the Sanctity of Marriage as Established by God. At the time, I was surprised to see the Catholic Church openly aligning itself with MassResistance, a Southern Poverty Law Center certified hate group.

Mark Potok, a senior fellow with the Southern Poverty Law Center told me “In our experience, it is highly unusual for the Catholic Church to work with groups like MassResistance, which has repeatedly, and utterly falsely, linked homosexuality to pedophilia, among other things. This is a group that lumps homosexuality in with criminal behaviors like bestiality, claims gay people are dangerous to children, and says, again falsely, that no gay people were murdered in the Holocaust. I should add, however, that we’ve not seen any real history of the Catholic Church working with hate groups. It may be that in this case they’ve simply failed to look into the background of the group they’re allying themselves with. At least I hope so.”

Whether or not NOM is a hate group on par with MassResistance is an open question to some, (though I am of the opinion that they are just sneakier in broadcasting their hate and intolerance, constantly skirting the line.) The one unifying presence in both the Rhode Island and San Francisco cases is NOM operative Christopher Plante, who led the coalition in a failed bid to prevent marriage equality in Rhode Island, and said to the Christian Post in April, that the March on Marriage event is aimed at showing ‘the world, the media, members of Congress and the Supreme Court that the marriage debate is not over. There is a huge groundswell of popular support, popular belief in traditional marriage. And despite what the polls may say, the reality is the majority of Americans believe marriage is between one man and one woman.”

Cordileone, defending his decision to attend the march in Washington, weakly claims that the event is “not ‘anti-LGBT’ … it is not anti-anyone or anti-anything,” but if the history here in Rhode Island is any indication, NOM operatives like Christopher Plante seek the endorsement of institutions like the Catholic Church to provide cover for their alliances with hate groups like MassResistance and other groups that spread ugly smears and lies about our LGBTQ brothers and sisters. Cordileone should weigh the political consequences of selling his status as a church leader so cheaply.

This weekend, as Rhode Island celebrates Pride, we should continue to encourage tolerance and acceptance rather than bigotry and hate, and we can only hope that in the future the Catholic Church will be on the right side of that equation.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387