Who gets to pick the next party chairperson?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DavidcaprioThe last time there was a Democrat in the governor’s office and a party chairperson vacancy, it was the Bruce Sundlun – not the Speaker of the House – who recommended a replacement to the state committee.

“Sundlun took the lead and went to great lengths to cultivate consensus, which he did rather quickly,” said David Preston, a Sundlun confidant who worked for the former governor and was executive director of the Democratic Party at the time. It was 1991 and Mark Weiner was appointed as the new chairman of the state Democratic Party.

This time, though, Governor Linc Chafee, who won office as an independent and then became a Democrat, said he would cede the responsibility to more senior members of the party.

“Despite my status as a Democratic Governor,” Chafee said in a prepared statement, “as a new Party member, I will defer these decisions to more veteran members.”

Jonathan Boucher, current executive director for the party, said the chair is elected by the majority vote of the state committee. There are 243 members.  “A candidate for chair has to get nominated and obtain a majority vote of those present,” he said. “At this time Grace Diaz will be the acting chair and will continue in that role until a meeting is called to elect a new chair, or the current term expires.”The Speaker of the House is said to have much influence over who becomes chairperson of the party.

The Young Democrats of Rhode Island, who can be said to represent the more progressive wing of the the Rhode Island Democratic caucus, said the next chairperson should reflect “both the best interests of Rhode Island and the principles of the national Democratic Party.”

“That includes,” the group said in an email, “firm commitments to reproductive justice, gun safety reforms, repealing voter ID, and making government more accessible and transparent.”

Should Rep. Peter Palumbo resign?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Palumbo
Palumbo models the tee shirt he helped design

Representative Peter Palumbo, is perhaps best-known for calling my niece, Jessica Ahlquist, an “Evil Little Thing” on the John DePetro Show and in the process creating an internet meme demonstrating the casual way in which politicians dehumanize atheists and women with their rhetoric. Or maybe he’s better known for the hateful anti-refuge letter he recently sent to Governor Chafee, or his .

But now he’s in the news because there’s an investigation involving beach concession stands he managed for now-former Democratic Party chairman David Caprio. Palumbo won the bid to manage the three concession stands, and then declined the contract. It was assumed, at a lower price by Caprio, who then hired Palumbo to manage the concession stands. The people lost out on $266,000 in revenue as a result. Caprio resigned Tuesday.

This, in the middle of an election season.

Rhode Island Republicans Mark Smiley, Chairman of the Rhode Island GOP and Executive Director Robert Paquin III have issued a press release calling “for State Representative Peter Palumbo to step down and aside from his race for re-election while he is investigated by the RI State Police.” If Palumbo steps down his Democratic primary opponent, Kirk McDonough will be running unopposed in the primary (Update: McDonough did not qualify for the primary ballot, so if Palumbo doesn’t run the seat would go to a Republican). The Republicans are fielding two candidates for Palumbo’s seat.

Should Peter Palumbo step down? If he and David Caprio colluded to profit $266,000 at the people’s expense, then yes he should. Certainly everyone is entitled to a presumption of innocence, and no one is sure as of yet that this entire affair involves anything precisely illegal, but the stench of insider politics and profits at the expense of taxpayers hovers over this mess in a way familiar to those who follow Rhode island politics. At the very least it should move the citizenry to demand that the Ethics Commission be granted oversight of the General Assembly, and we should all be wondering why elected officials are free to bid on state contracts, an obvious preventable conflict of interest.

[Edit: Common Cause RI tweeted to me, “the Ethics Commission still has jurisdiction over GA for not legislative actions such as this.”]

Scandal aside, Palumbo’s policy proscriptions are wrong for Rhode Island.

Politically, Palumbo is to the right of most Republicans in this state. His conservative voting record paints him as a true Rhode Island DINO, a Democrat in name only. Palumbo has a 100% rating from the NRA, voted for Voter ID, is rated at 22% on Civil Rights by the ACLU and somehow avoided voting for or against marriage equality when it passed last year.

How conservative is Palumbo?  In 2010 Palumbo a he introduced that mirrored a controversial immigration bill from Arizona. Palumbo ended his appearance saying, “Thank God for Fox News.”

That’s pretty conservative.

Young Dems: replace Caprio with a liberal party chair


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Young Democrats President Mark Gray.
Young Democrats of RI President Mark Gray.

The Young Democrats of Rhode Island says the next chairperson of the state Democratic Party should reflect “both the best interests of Rhode Island and the principles of the national Democratic Party.”

“That includes,” they said in an email, “firm commitments to reproductive justice, gun safety reforms, repealing voter ID, and making government more accessible and transparent.”

David Caprio resigned yesterday from the post after an NBC 10 Parker Gavigan scoop about his beach concession stand contract. Gavigan reported that Caprio assumed the contracts after Cranston state Rep. Peter Palumbo won the bid, dropped out and then took a job managing the concession stands for Caprio.

Caprio is a conservative Democrat who was ousted from his legislative seat by progressive Democrat Teresa Tanzi in 2010. Caprio was recommended as chairman by former Speaker Gordon Fox.

Here’s the Young Democrats full press release:

Like many in the state, the Young Democrats of Rhode Island were surprised to learn of David Caprio’s resignation from the crucial role of Rhode Island Democratic Party Chair. We wish to sincerely thank him for his hard work and his many years of service to Rhode Island.

We now must look to the future; YDRI congratulates Representative Grace Diaz on her elevation to Acting Chair, and we wish her the best of luck during this time of transition.

The RI Democratic Party Chair plays a powerful but underappreciated role. The Chair facilitates connections between candidates and incumbents at every level of our state’s democracy, from our city and town committees up through the Governor’s office. The Chair wields and distributes both financial and informational resources, including fundraising support and access to our party’s voter tracking database.

Most importantly, the Chair must act as a visible embodiment of and vigorous advocate for the ideals of the Democratic Party.

It is with these responsibilities in mind that the Young Democrats of Rhode Island urges that we, as soon as possible, nominate a new chair that reflects both the best interests of Rhode Island and the principles of the national Democratic Party. That includes firm commitments to reproductive justice, gun safety reforms, repealing voter ID, and making government more accessible and transparent, positions that are keystones of the national Democratic Platform and popular with Rhode Islanders. As always, we are confident that a Rhode Island Democratic Party built on these principles will help level the playing field, expand economic opportunities, and raise the quality of life for Rhode Islanders—young and old—across our state.

New Seth Magaziner TV characters are Caprio-esque


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

insider politicsOn the day his opponent’s brother is resigning amid scandal as chair of the state Democratic Party, general treasurer candidate Seth Magaziner comes out swinging against the status quo with his second TV ad of the campaign.

“Seth introduces ‘Insider Politics’ and ‘Mismanagement’, two consummate practitioners of the old politics that is ruining Rhode Island,” said campaign manager Evan England in an email. Here they are:

England didn’t exactly answer when I asked him if “Insider Politics” and “Mismanagement” were meant to be represent his primary opponent Frank Caprio.

“The characters represent the old politics that have brought Rhode Island the highest unemployment in the country,” England wrote. “Seth’s frustration with insider politics and mismanagement – a position many Rhode Islanders share – has been a consistent theme of his campaign.”

The commercials will be airing on TV as Rhode Islanders learn more about Frank’s brother David Caprio resigning as chairman of the state Democratic Party after an NBC10 Parker Gavigan scoop. Gavigan reported that David Caprio assumed the contracts for three state beach concession stands after the winning bidder, Cranston Rep. Peter Palumbo, dropped out and went to work for Caprio. The state police are investigating, reported Gavigan.

In the email from the Magaziner camp, England writes, “It’s time to kick ‘Insider Politics’ and ‘Mismanagement’ out and elect new leaders who will give Rhode Island a fresh start at creating jobs.”

Where did Congressional climate change deniers go?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

sheldon

How do you know Democrats are slowly starting to win the hearts and minds of Americans when it comes to addressing climate change?

When every witness at a Congressional committee hearing – even those invited by Republicans – can agree that climate change is real and caused carbon emissions.

To kick off the hearing on the costs of climate change, Rhode Island Senator Sheldon Whitehouse asked everyone: “It appears to me that everybody on this panel agrees that climate change is real, it’s really happening, and it relates to carbon emissions. Is that true across the board of all five of you?”

They all said yes. Here’s the video:

It was a Budget Committee hearing titled: “The Costs of Inaction: The Economic and Budgetary Consequences of Climate Change” and you can see a list of the witnesses here.

Tackling beach erosion with two sticks and a string


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Jon Boothroyd and Bryan Oakley, Geologists with the Rhode Island Geological Survey provide a historical account of coastal erosion in South Kingstown. (Photo Tracey C. O'Neill)
Jon Boothroyd and Bryan Oakley, Geologists with the Rhode Island Geological Survey provide a historical account of coastal erosion in South Kingstown. (Photo Tracey C. O’Neill)

Matunuck –  Armed with just two sticks and a string,  a group of 15 environmentalists took to South Kingstown Town Beach to tackle one of the biggest issues facing Rhode Island: eroding barrier beaches.

“The reason we can hold this kind of workshop is that the technique we use to actually monitor, to create these (profiles) is with a very simple technique,” said Bryan Oakley, University of Rhode Island graduate and Asst. Professor of Environmental Earth Sciences at Eastern Connecticut State University. “We don’t have anything that costs more than $30 to build these sticks. It literally is as we call it two sticks and a string.’ ”

The training is sponsored by the Coastal Resources Management Council in collaboration with the Rhode Island Geological Survey at URI, the beach gathering was intended to encourage volunteers to actively participate in monitoring changes and collecting data on the state’s barrier beaches.

The Emory Board Method

“We like it because it doesn’t require a lot of fancy equipment, “ said Oakley. “So in this day and age of funding, we can go out and set up a new profile for very little money. It’s just time to go run the data.”

20140723_095925
Bryan Oakley (l) and Rob Hollis (c) instruct a group on the science of beach profiling. (Photo Tracey C. O’Neill)

Dubbed the Emery Board method, the profile technique was formulated by the late Kenneth O. Emery, (K.O.), Scientist Emeritus at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute.

“Anybody can learn how to do it. It’s just a matter of consistency and really practice,” said Oakley. “You get better, you get faster, you get more efficient the more you do it.”

“It’s a field driven technique, we like that because its easy to sit and look at GIS and look at long-term changes, to the shoreline, but a lot of the detail is, you’re out here the day after a storm, you collect the data and you can say something about how much the shoreline went away,” he said.

Janet Freedman, CRMC Coastal Geologist helps Dori Boardman with her beach sketch. (Photo Tracey C. O'Neill)
Janet Freedman, CRMC Coastal Geologist helps Dori Boardman with her beach sketch. (Photo Tracey C. O’Neill)

Assisting the two professors in instruction were Janet Freedman, CRMC Coastal Geologist and Rob Hollis, URI Graduate Student.

The two sticks method was also the more practical choice for volunteer profiling as the more technical, kinematic GPS systems cost anywhere from $30,000 to $60,000.

Volunteers were also given tracking, plotting and sketching instruction for future use on their chosen beaches across the state.

Spearheading the training was Dr. Jon Boothroyd, State Geologist and Research Professor Emeritus at URI’s Rhode Island Geological Survey.

“Things are about to happen here,” said Boothroyd. “They are already happening.”

Pointing to South Kingstown Town Beach, where Boothroyd established a profile in 1996, he said, “This is a highly erodible place. It’s eroding at the same rate that some of the beaches are eroding and even more. And we think, we don’t know yet, and we hope the SAMP will shed some light on it, that there’s wave refraction around the shallower water out here. That’s a focus here.”

“The CRMC asked us to start a profile here in 1996,” Boothroyd said.

“They built this part in 1992,” he said of the town beach’s pavilion. “And they built the shore-parallel boardwalk in 1994. Almost as soon as it was built, people started noticing that the scarp and the bluff were approaching the boardwalk pilings.”

Taking care to school participants on the need for beach profiling, Boothroyd and Oakley walked the group through the history and science of the eroding shoreline. Before heading out onto the beach for hands-on training, the educators presented a basic foundation of changes and profiles generally seen on Rhode Island beaches.

Recovery takes time

Residents from multiple coastal communities took part in the training. (Photo Tracey C. O'Neill)
Residents from multiple coastal communities took part in the training. (Photo Tracey C. O’Neill)

The South Kingstown Town Beach is serving as the subject because it provides both historical and current change lessons in geology and meteorology.

“You know that the storms pass off to the east – that the wind comes in from the northeast – and we have what is known as Nor’easters,” said Boothroyd. “Everybody calls an extra- tropical cyclone a Nor’easter, but here if the storm track passes to the west, we have winds coming in from the southeast, so we really have So’easters on this coast. “[It] depends on which way your coast faces.”

Using Superstorm Sandy as a severe weather gauge, Boothroyd explained Sandy’s path and turn away from the RI coast.

“If Sandy hadn’t turned, we’d look like New Jersey. Not everyone believes it, but we dodged a bullet.”

The historical data for the beach, chronicled the changes since Sandy brought the sea ashore in Matunuck.

“Without this data, we wouldn’t know that the bluff here went back 7 meters during Sandy – the crest of the bluff,” said Oakley.

Engaging the participants, Oakley pointed to the scarp (slope formed by wave action) west of the pavilion. “So that scarp you see down there went back, 23 feet give or take during one storm.”

Natural replenishment and erosion is a long process, with intermittent storms and activity forestalling and contributing, in either positive or negative processes, the construct of the barrier beach.

“We’ve found over the years that there’s a cycle, although I’d hate to call it a cycle, but there’s a pattern,” said Boothroyd. “If you start with a very large beach with a big berm, then you have a moderate storm, severe storm, and post-storm recovery, over time it comes back. But it takes actually years to come back, so we’re still recovering here after Sandy.”

Joining the training were volunteers from Middletown, Little Compton, South Kingstown, Charlestown and Narragansett.The Narrow River Preservation Society in Narragansett, Salt Ponds Coalition,  2nd Beach, Middletown and the South Kingstown Conservation Commission were represented.

CRMC may offer additional beach profiling training sessions in the future, according to Laura Dwyer, spokesperson for CRMC.

The wide gap between Gist’s leadership theory and practice


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

sheehanWhile serving as Rhode Island Department of Education (RIDE) Commissioner, Deborah A. Gist earned her Ed.D. in June of 2012. Her dissertation, “An Ocean State Voyage: A Leadership Case Study of Creating an Evaluation System with, and for, Teachers,” was a reflective leadership study centered on the commissioner’s experiences and lessons learned as she created and implemented a new statewide evaluation system for teachers.

My interest in her paper grew after reading an online article about the difficulty one URI professor was having obtaining a copy. As a member of the Senate’s Education Committee, I requested a copy from the commissioner, who replied that her dissertation had been “embargoed” until June 2014. This July, I again asked Gist to allow me to view her dissertation. She declined, again. Her reluctance to disclose her dissertation fed speculation that it contained some controversial issue(s). Others thought it might contain some insightful material reserved for future publication. Recently, a copy of Dr. Gist’s dissertation was obtained by a reporter who permitted me to review it.

I now believe I know why she chose to keep her work out of the public eye for as long as possible. To guide her efforts to develop and implement a teacher evaluation system, Gist embraced a theory or model of good leadership which eluded her in professional practice.

Gist employed a leadership theory called adaptive change, which involves changing people’s hearts and minds to transform a large-scale system. Unless attitudes, values and behaviors change, people cannot make the adaptive leap necessary to thrive in their new environment. To achieve this critical conversion, she needed to inspire confidence in her evaluation system to get the necessary “buy-in” and support from teachers around the state. Teachers, the commissioner wrote, had to believe that the system ultimately was “valuable” and would need to trust the system was truly “designed primarily for feedback and support.”

Unfortunately, these goals contrast sharply with teachers’ view of the evaluation system.

Educators found it to be time-consuming while providing little in the way of constructive feedback, let alone professional development. More pointedly, teachers complained that the evaluation’s over-reliance on constantly improving student test scores was an unfair measure as teachers cannot control all of the variables affecting student performance, especially the socio-economic background of pupils in urban centers. In her dissertation, the Commissioner touted that she demonstrated flexibility and responsiveness to these teachers in making changes to the evaluation system. In reality, however, the changes made were often more negative than positive. For example, the original design included a Student Learning Score weighting of 51%, RIDE subsequently moved to a 4X5 column matrix giving a heavier weight to the Student Learning score over the Professional Practice score when determining overall teacher effectiveness.

As soon as students underperformed on tests, teachers were blamed for the failure, resulting in unprecedented low morale. The Gist reaction was on national display when all of the teachers at Central Falls High School were fired. The individual merits of the teachers did not matter nor did it matter if students had applied themselves or were disadvantaged. Under Gist’s leadership philosophy (corporate reform), all teachers were held strictly accountable for low school test scores. Educators were again broadsided by the mass firing of all of the teachers in Providence, a year later. What hurt the commissioner’s credibility in Providence was her defense of wholesale firings, calling them a “good and just cause” [ignoring RIDE’s own case law which would have prohibited firing all teachers].

Good leaders lead by example. If Gist were to do so, she would hold herself to the same standard and consequence for performance failure as she does teachers. In the new evaluation, teachers must develop Student Learning Objectives to be used to demonstrate their students are continually making progress based on standardized tests or other measures of student performance. If teachers do not meet this standard, they can be deemed “ineffective”. If teachers do not improve after a year, they face termination as had teachers in Central Falls Ironically, the Department of Education, at Gist’s request, has set 33 targets for statewide student performance. The bulk of them are related to closing the achievement gap while a few involve graduation rates and how students do after high school. In 2012, the state reached just 1 out of those 33 targets. In other years, under Gist’s leadership, RIDE did not fair much better. Yet, the commissioner is not held to account for these dismal results.

The final failure in leadership involved Gist’s penchant to use threats to enforce her will, in an e-mail to her staff, Gist warned them she would not “hesitate to take action against any employee of RIDE who purposefully works to thwart RIDE policy.” This threat was in response to RIDE staff who had intended to attend, on their own time, a vigil for the teachers to be fired in Central Falls. Gist violated the law in attempting to restrict the free speech of her staff, and was cited by the State Labor Relations Board. Gist also threatened legal action against any school superintendents who permitted teachers to be assigned based on seniority, threatening sanctions “up to and including the loss of certification,” withholding state aid and legal action. Irrespective of one’s view on seniority, I think most would agree that withholding state aid would likely hurt the very students the commissioner professes to put first.

In conclusion, Gist failed to get the level of “buy-in” necessary to create a fair evaluation system that would garner the support of a majority of teachers. That failure was not due to teachers’ fear of change or being held accountable, but to the Commissioner’s own poor leadership ability. Befittingly, 82% of public school teachers polled had a negative view of Gist’s job performance! All things considered, I can appreciate why she wanted to keep her dissertation out of the public eye as long as possible.

The economics of refugee children


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

10485375_720845927976565_2796094709728063953_nIf the most important thing in the world is the Economy and all else is secondary in consideration, then human life is only valuable in as much as it contributes to the efficient maintenance of the Economy. In such a world the makers of things and the investors of Capital are of primary importance, while the takers of things and those incapable of meaningful contribution are at best to be considered luxuries and at worst impediments to our great society.

It is easy to understand why Terry Gorman, founder of nativist hate group RIILE, motivated by racism and misanthropy, would be so outraged by the influx of refugee children that he would hold weekly rallies to announce his special kind of awfulness to the world, but it is harder to understand the rationale of those who maintain that they are not motivated by unreasoning hatred, but by simple considerations of market forces and uncontrollable economic reality.

Justin Katz, appearing on Channel 10’s Wingmen recently, maintained that, “illegal immigrants” will put a burden on schools and other social services, even though the group Katz fronts for, the Rhode Island Center for Freedom and Prosperity, actively seeks to cut funds for schools and social services. In his defense, Katz is merely following his economic ideas to their inevitable conclusion: Since the kinds of  policies the Center advocates for have already made it more difficult to adequately care for at-risk children presently living in Rhode Island, how can our state possibly afford to care for even more at-risk children?

What any potential influx of refugee children will reveal about the Rhode Island economy is what economist Robert Reich calls a vicious circle, a complex working of policies that reinforces itself through a feedback loop with ever more negative economic consequences, at least for most of us. (A very few will attain unimaginable wealth.) The rules in Rhode Island have been constructed to deprive the necessities of life to those deemed incapable of meaningful contributions to the all-important Economy. The arrival of hungry children simply makes this fact gallingly apparent.

This is why religious values always fail when stacked up against conservative economic values. Bishop Tobin, of the Providence Catholic Diocese, can quite clearly say, on religious grounds, “If the refugee children come to Rhode Island I hope and pray that all the members of our community will work together, in a thoughtful and compassionate way, to welcome them and care for them to the very best of our ability. The Catholic Church will do its part. Certainly the children should not be the object of our political scorn” but these words are completely ignored by members of groups like RI Taxpayers, who publicly “supports Terry Gorman and his RIILE group.”

Larry Girouard, President of RI Taxpayers, allows his website to carry such pleasantries as, “While the feds may be paying the expenses of these children, we all know it will be a matter of time before that expense will be passed to the state taxpayers. This state is under enough financial pressure with a bloated state budget. This is just another expense the taxpayers didn’t need or expect.”

How small.

What are we to make of an economic system bounded by policies that cannot value the lives of children? Are we to simply shrug our shoulders and resign ourselves to an arbitrary rule system, championed by people like Girouard and Katz, that reduces and dehumanizes refugee children to “objects of our political scorn”? If the rules are such that multitudes of people must suffer so that a very few might live in unimaginable and undeserved opulence, why are we playing by such rules? Why must we reject what is best in ourselves, our empathy, to serve the venal economic wishes of a group of small minded Objectivists more concerned with fostering human greed than human compassion?

Happily, those that would deny food and shelter to refugee children are far outnumbered by the rest of us who see caring for those in need as being essential to our very humanity. Questioning the need to offer assistance to children stuns us. It’s impossible to not see such attitudes as some kind of perverse joke and an abandonment of essential human values. “I’m not going to ruin a perfectly good pair of $200 shoes wading into a puddle to save a drowning two-year old,” is something said by villains, not decent people.

When groups like RI Taxpayers or the RI Center for Freedom and Prosperity tell us what the rules of the economy should be, we hear them talk about fairness and equity, and we assume that they are honest moral players with whom we disagree. When the pain of their policies fall on us, we bear it, because we have been bewildered by their talk of fairness. We believe that our placement in the great Economic game has been determined honestly, and that we are somehow getting what we deserve.

However, at the moment children show up at our door, hungry and without shelter and those that set the rules tell us we are powerless to help, we see the Economy for what it is: a game to keep us poor and powerless.

That’s when we wake up, and tell them we aren’t playing their game anymore.

We need to celebrate Bay Day every day


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
at beach
Click on the image to read the 2014 Watershed Counts report.

It was Governor’s Bay Day this past weekend, where the bonus was free parking and free transportation to the state beaches in Narragansett Bay and along the Atlantic coast, widely acclaimed as some of the most beautiful shoreline in the world. Beaches are not normally free as user fees help maintain and protect these valuable natural assets.

Over the last several years, many towns like Bristol and Newport have invested millions in infrastructure to protect Bristol Town Beach, Easton’s (First) Beach in Newport, and other local beaches. These improvements come at a cost, but they are critical long-term investments to help keep beaches open and avoid costly beach closures. When beaches are open, local economies that rely upon beachgoers and tourists reap measurable returns. Visitors that enjoy these clean beaches also return to enjoy future beach seasons. A new report by Watershed Counts was issued this week that celebrates these investments to protect water quality at our beaches, and gives the public a full assessment of their current health.

The 2014 Watershed Counts Report [RI Future story here] details how the summer of 2013 saw impressive rain totals. Normally, a pattern of excessive rain translates into a large number of beaches closures. This is because rain washes pollution and bacteria into our coastal waters and beaches must be closed by the health departments to protect people from disease. But 2013 was different for those towns that had the foresight and financial backbone to tackle these issues. Newport invested over $6 million to build an ultraviolet plant to disinfect water before it affects beachgoers; and the Town of Bristol transformed Bristol Town Beach by installing numerous green infrastructure safeguards to protect beach water quality. Neither of these beaches was closed last year.

In fact, the report shows that there were fewer beach closures in 2013 compared to past rainy years, which means that investments are paying off through reduced water pollution. All along the shores of Narragansett Bay and the coast, similar plans are emerging. Many local leaders understand that clean and open beaches are important to residents and are a catalyst to a healthy economy. Clean and healthy waters create jobs in the marine trades, fishing, shellfishing, and the tourism and hospitality industries. Property values also benefit from clean waterways.

However, the 2014 Watershed Counts Report also provides a note of caution that the increased challenges of climate change may bring additional threats to our beaches, such as sea level rise, rising temperatures, and more intense and frequent storms. All of these impacts have the potential to close beaches more often due to water quality concerns caused by stormwater and wastewater pollution. Increased temperatures enhance the breeding ground for harmful bacteria, and more frequent and intense storms mean more pollutants are deposited at local beaches. In addition, many of our beaches are bordered by buildings and other hardened surface structures, such as parking lots, that prevent beaches from naturally migrating inland in response to rising sea levels.

Yet another issue raised in the 2014 Watershed Counts Report is a lack of dedicated state funding to allow Rhode Island and Massachusetts health agencies to monitor how clean our beaches really are. We close beaches to protect public health, but we only know when to close them when we test beach water quality. Presently, the vast majority of funding for marine beach monitoring comes from federal support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. While the states appreciate these federal funds to monitor water quality, this federal program has recently been at issue for possible elimination in federal budget talks. In addition, there is no state or federal funding to test water quality at our freshwater beaches, which are central to summer recreation in many Rhode Island and Massachusetts communities.

Watershed Counts, co-led by the University of Rhode Island’s Coastal Institute and the Narragansett Bay Estuary Program, is a partnership of 60 state and federal agencies, non-governmental organizations, municipalities and watershed groups that annually assesses the environmental quality of the Narragansett Bay watershed, 60% of which is in Massachusetts. Watershed Counts constantly stresses the fact that Narragansett Bay and our coastline are not only our leading environmental resource, but its most vital economic asset as well. See the 2014 Watershed Counts Report at www.watershedcounts.org.

Beaches are deeply embedded in the culture of Rhode Island and Massachusetts. Ask any resident why they live here, or ask any visitor why they return year after year, and they will likely say it’s because they enjoy the beautiful waters of the Atlantic Ocean or Narragansett Bay. It is time for other municipalities to follow the examples set by Bristol and Newport and invest in our beaches. It is also time for Rhode Island and Massachusetts to identify a funding source to monitor beach water quality as federal funding will likely wash away with the tide.

By Judith Swift, Nicole Rohr, and Tom Borden. Swift is the Director and Rohr the Assistant Director at the University of Rhode Island’s Coastal Institute. Tom Borden is the Program Director at the Narragansett Bay Estuary Program.

Two communities, two rallies, one war


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_3490Last Saturday afternoon I attended a “” rally in downtown Providence and on the following Wednesday evening I attended an “Emergency Solidarity Rally” for Israel at the Jewish Community Center on the East Side of Providence, near where I live. As one of the few people to have attended both events, I think my observations may be of some value.

It would be easy, and deceiving, to talk about the similarities between the two events. I could talk about how both sides want peace, how both sides have families and friends in very real danger and how both the Jewish and the Palestinian communities here in Rhode Island feel isolated and targeted.

It is more difficult, and I believe more instructive, to contrast the two rallies. How do the differences in venue, political support and money affect public perception of the current conflict? How is the reaction to the conflict shaping communities here in Rhode Island?

I will admit upfront that my sympathies almost always align with the oppressed. I believe strongly in human rights. I think Israel and Palestine must start working together towards a two state solution and a lasting peace. Israel must stop the building and begin the deconstruction of illegal settlements. I think the United Nations Rights Council is wise to investigate Israel for war crimes. As the occupying military power, it is Israel’s responsibility to defend the lives of Gazan civilians, a responsibility Israel has not only repeatedly failed to uphold, but seems to flaunt as unimportant.

***

DSC_4017Burnside Park in downtown Providence is located between City Hall and the Federal Building, next to Kennedy Plaza. It was here that Occupy Providence made camp in 2012, and I saw several members of Occupy at the “Stand with Gaza” rally. I parked a short distance away, and noticed two young Muslim women dressed in brightly colored hijabs heading the same direction I was. As we waited for the light to change for the crosswalk, a man began to mutter something at the women. I didn’t quite hear what he said but it was clear that he did not like the fact that two Muslim women were walking through Providence. The man oozed prejudice and hate.

The light changed, and the women walked away from the man and towards the rally, pretending not to hear him. Here was an example of the prejudice Arab and Muslim people experience in our country every day, the kind of prejudice I never face. It galls me that such a thing could happen in Rhode Island, where religious freedom was first enshrined into law. The women seem unaffected, but I silently seethed.

At the corner of Burnside Park the rally organizers were handing out signs to early arrivals when officers from the Providence Police Department arrived. About half the people assembled for the rally so far were persons of color or dressed in traditional ethnic or religious garments. It was not automatically assumed by those attending that the police were on hand to ensure the safety of the participants.

Rick, the friend who had invited me to cover this event, asked me if I thought the police would try to shut the rally down.

“Of course not,” I replied, like the knuckle-headed white guy with press credentials that I am, “It’s your First and Fourth Amendment right to peaceably assemble and protest.”

Rick did not seem so sure, so I held up my camera and said, “I have my camera. They won’t do anything on camera.”

Later, Rick told me that he had never been at a protest rally where it had occurred to him that the police were there for the protection of the participants. Rick does not see the First and Fourth Amendments as a guarantee of rights for people like him.

The Providence Police did not shut down the protest or interfere, but I did feel as though the police were more interested in monitoring the behavior of the rally participants than in protecting the participants from those who might wish them harm. This rally was outside, on a street corner near a public park, with cars, bikes and pedestrians passing by. Prejudice, as I had just witnessed, is ubiquitous. It takes courage for an American Muslim or Arab to publicly support Gaza. This is not a politically popular position.

Four days later, at the Emergency Solidarity Rally for Israel, the police were unquestionably there to protect the attendees of the rally from outsiders who might wish them harm. The police were positioned inside and outside the Jewish Community Center, located on the East Side of Providence, the wealthiest area of the city. I was told by an officer to have my identification ready or I would not be allowed into the auditorium. Security and safety were very important, and this was reflected in the attendance. More than 400 people crowded into the safety of the Community Center auditorium, three times the number who came out in support of Palestine on Saturday.

***

DSC_3737The most moving part of the Stand with Palestine Rally was the reading of the names of those killed in the war. For over half an hour speakers read the names of the 336 killed in the war so far. As the reading of the names became too emotionally taxing, the list would be handed off to another speaker. The ages of those killed ranged from one to 80 years. Way too many of the dead were children. It was exhausting. Overwhelming.

The last three names read were of the three Israelis who had lost their lives in the conflict. Those in attendance were ask to keep all those killed in their thoughts or prayers.

By the time of the Emergency Solidarity rally four days later, the number of Palestinian dead had more than tripled and the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) had launched a ground invasion. At the Emergency Solidarity rally, Rabbi Elan Babchuck, with all due solemnity, read the names of the now twenty-seven Israelis killed in Gaza so far. It took under five minutes. As I write this I have just heard a news report estimate that 40 Israeli soldiers and three Israeli citizens have died in this confrontation. The Palestinian dead are approaching 800 in number. By the time you read this the number will be higher still, but you can rest assured that the dead Palestinian children will far outnumber the dead Israeli soldiers.

The death of young Israeli soldiers is a tragedy. No life should be cut so short. In the audience gathered inside the Community Center were parents of men and women who are in the IDF. Is there a devil’s calculus for the loss of children? Is there a way to measure the loss of a Palestinian child versus the loss of an Israeli soldier? Is there a ratio of death that seems proper and fair? What is the calculation I should use to value my own son or daughter?

***

DSC_3935A well-planned political rally always has a political ask. The protesters at Burnside Park charged that Israel is an apartheid state, and that the citizens of Gaza live in a virtual prison, without hope for a future. Those organizing for Palestine called upon Rhode Island’s congressional delegation to curtail their support for Israel until the Israeli government lifts sanctions and starts negotiating in good faith with Palestine. In today’s political climate though, no matter how much mail and email Rhode Island’s congressional delegation receive, it unlikely that any of them will change their position on Israel. Representatives Cicilline and Langevin, and Senators Reed and Whitehouse, have all been vocal in their support of Israel, and conventional wisdom is that it is political suicide to support Palestine over Israel.

At the Emergency Solidarity rally, Marty Cooper, director of Community Relations for the Jewish Alliance of Greater Rhode Island, asked those in attendance to send letters and emails thanking the representatives and senators for their continued support of Israel. He asked that those in attendance write letters to the Providence Journal, praising the paper’s recent inclusion of an editorial and an op-ed in support of Israel. In essence, Cooper asked that those in attendance celebrate the political and journalistic support Israel continues to receive.

Supporting Israel is a smart campaign move. That’s why Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Kilmartin attended Wednesday night’s rally, along with three Democratic candidates in the race for mayor of Providence, including City Council President Michael Solomon, Jorge Elorza and Brett Smiley. Ken Block, who is seeking the Republican nomination for Governor, played the crowd, shaking hands. I noticed progressive State Senators Josh Miller and Gayle Goldin in the crowd. There may well have been other politicians that I missed.

There were no candidates glad-handing the crowd at the Stand with Gaza rally on Saturday.

***

DSC_3517At Saturday’s rally I saw a Muslim woman holding a red, white and blue sign that read, ZIONISM IS RACISM. On Wednesday night I saw a woman waving an Israeli flag and wearing a pin that stated, simply, I AM A ZIONIST.

To the Palestinian woman with the sign, Zionism represents the theft of her homeland and the annihilation of her people and culture. To the Jewish woman wearing her pin Zionism is the culmination of the efforts of generations of people working towards a return to the Jewish homeland. The entirety of that promised homeland, however, can only be reclaimed if the Palestinians vacate it or accept their lot as second-class citizens within it, something I suspect most Palestinians see as tantamount to genocide.

Though there were people at the Emergency Solidarity Rally comfortable with identifying as Zionists, positioning themselves with the more extreme right-wing politics of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, there was no one at the pro-Palestinian rally identifying themselves as being aligned with the more extreme elements of Palestine, like Hamas.

Those attending the Stand with Gaza rally were united in their calls for peace, for an end to the violence and for an end to the occupation of Gaza. Together they asked for support, understanding, effective humanitarian aid and human rights. They wanted their children to stop dying.

DSC_3997Those at the pro-Israel rally were less united. They also wanted peace and an end to the violence. But as a group they were divided on the occupation of Gaza. They were divided on whether or not the situation in Gaza amounts to self-defense, occupation, apartheid or genocide.

During the solidarity rally Rabbi Michelle Dardashti, a chaplain at Brown University, read a poem to those in attendance that explored the suffering of first the Israeli and then the Gazan people. Dardashti said, “It’s easier for us to hear the first part of [the poem] about our people suffering, and it’s very scary and hard for us to look at the images of the Gazans crying and bleeding and suffering. We do have a right and an obligation to defend ourselves, and we also have an obligation, I believe, to defend our hearts from hardening.”

In response, a few members of the audience, their hearts hardened, cried “No!” as in “No, I will not allow myself to feel empathy for those who have lost children on the other side of this conflict.”

The term “Emergency Solidarity Rally” takes on a new meaning in this context. The death of Gazan children is a moral outrage that threatens Israeli solidarity. As right wing politicians in Israel utilize ever more hyperbolic rhetoric to defend their attack on Gaza, reasonable people are given pause. What is the ultimate cost, in terms of dead Gazans, for a free and peaceful Israel? Is any amount of death, up to and including genocide, worth paying?

Even as Palestinians find greater solidarity under the duress of being occupied, Israel finds itself fracturing under the moral stress of being occupiers. Such is the difference, it seems to me, between “Standing with Gaza” and the need for “Emergency Solidarity.”

Watershed Counts report: Or why rain is bad for the beach


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
at beach
Click on the image to read the full 2014 Watershed Counts report

Governor’s Bay Day, when all Rhode Island state beaches celebrate the Ocean State by offering free admission and parking, was washed out by a driving rain yesterday. This is bad news for Rhode Island even if you didn’t miss a free beach day yesterday.

“Our beaches will be the bellwether of climate change,” said Judith Swift, executive director of URI’s Coastal Institute. “Not only will we lose beaches due to sea level rise, but increased precipitation will add additional pollutants to our beaches from stormwater runoff.”

Swift was speaking about the new 2014 Watershed Counts report, released today (you can read the full report here). But weather like yesterday’s is one of the reasons we should pay close attention to the report’s findings.

“Beach closures,” according to the press release, “are very much dependent upon rainfall, as stormwater flushes out pollutants and bacteria that close both beaches and shellfishing areas.”

The report explains: “Annual average precipitation … has been increasing over the last century and this trend is projected to continue. When you look at the pattern of rainfall, something else becomes apparent: the frequency of intense rainfall events has also increased. When we get large amounts of precipitation in a short amount of time, the stormwater runoff can overwhelm our treatment facilities and result in sewage being flushed into the Narragansett Bay.”

And shows it in a cartoon, as well:

Click on the image to read the full report.
Click on the image to read the full report.

There were 41 beach closures last summer. This summer there are currently five closures – at First Beach in Middletown, the Bristol and Warren town beaches and two beaches in Tiverton. This rain event will surely lead to even more this week. (RI Future reported on the scientific causes of beach closures, their economic effects and how RI monitors the water last summer).

But the good news is while we had heavy rains last summer, we experienced fewer beach closings than previous summers. There were 86 beach closures in 2009, 55 in 2010 and 45 in 2011. The Watershed Counts report says the counter-intuitive decrease in closures can be attributed because of public investments to control stormwater runoff, sewer overflow.

“Using green infrastructure and other best management practices to protect beach water quality is paying off,” said Department of Environmental Management Director Janet Coit. “DEM welcomes the opportunity to partner with cities and towns to enhance what is a time-honored Rhode Island tradition – enjoying a glorious day at the beach.”

A clean water/open space bond on the November ballot, if approved by voters, would invest $20 million to further clean water and segregate sewage and stormwater overflow, according to the report, but that’s only a fraction of the need. “Municipalities and the Narragansett Bay Commission have identified more than $1.8 billion dollars of needed clean water in frastructure improvements ranging from wastewater treatment upgrades and storm water quality improvements to combined sewer overflow abatement projects,” according to DEM in the report.

“The opportunity to promote and invest in a beautiful Rhode Island is significant, and the need for that investment is immediate,” according to a DEM statement in the report. “Rhode Island’s greatest natural resource and a key driver to economic growth—Narragansett Bay—is threatened by polluted run-off and the damaging effects of climate change. Conversely, local food markets are booming, horticultural, and agricultural and landscape companies are doing more local business than ever, and our $2.26 billion dollar tourism sector is growing.”

According to the press release, there has been a “surprising” lack of support from the state to monitor water quality at local beaches.

“The funding for marine beach monitoring comes mostly from federal sources. The National Beach Program provided over $200,000 to both Rhode Island and Massachusetts in 2013,” it reads. “The state budgets contained no funding, despite the fact that beaches are an economic driver, and that the federal monitoring program for saltwater beaches has recently been at issue for possible elimination in federal budget talks.”

Fecteau to Cicilline: support marijuana reform ‘or be held accountable’


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

fecteauAs a candidate for Congress, I am concerned with the way marijuana has been used to incarcerate and detain people from mostly low income and minority backgrounds.  While I support federal regulation of marijuana, I can settle for what is known as the Respect States’ and Citizens’ Rights Act.

Congressman David Cicilline’s ambivalence on marijuana regulation is concerning.  In 2012, Congressman Cicilline supported regulation of marijuana “so long as you have those kind of protections [similar to alcohol], you should treat it the same.”  However, in a recent interview with Tim White on Newsmakers (12:20), Congressman Cicilline said he is “very conflicted” and is “still studying this.”  Congressman Cicilline seems either incredibly inconsistent or breathtakingly insincere about regulating marijuana at the federal level.

Our beliefs and laws are incrementally progressing, but not far enough.  My former White House employer, President Barack Obama, acknowledged marijuana is “no more dangerous than alcohol.” Attorney General Eric Holder stated the focus will be on the criminal element of marijuana – though that is hard to define.  Despite all of this and its regulation in both Washington and Colorado, marijuana is still a controlled substance.  At the federal level, someone can be prosecuted even if it is regulated in the respective state.  I want to revise this policy, but not if Republicans get there way.

The Republicans could undermine this in two ways: first, a Republican president enforce more stringent marijuana prohibition again and second, the Republicans in Congress could pass the Enforce the Law Act. This act would give Congress the power to sue the President to enforce marijuana prohibition. We need to work together to fight for reasonable laws.

The cost of federal marijuana prohibition is high.  The US has approximately 2.3 million people behind bars or 25% of the world’s prisoners.  These prisoners cost taxpayers at the federal, state, and local level $68 billion annually. This is just the quantifiable cost.

While solving little or nothing, marijuana prohibition rips families apart, destroys individuals’ lives, and causes perennial suffering. According to FBI statistics, of all arrests involving drug abuse violations, roughly 43.3% are people who are arrested for mere possession. Yet, even with these arrests, according to the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse, 34% of teens say it is easier to obtain marijuana than alcohol or tobacco.

While I still favor federal decriminalization and even regulation, I support what is known as the Respect States’ and Citizens’ Rights Act as a reasonable middle ground.  The Respect States’ and Citizens Rights Act does not decriminalize marijuana per se.  Instead, it provides states with the legislative leeway to develop their own laws to regulate marijuana so long as state government regulation does ensue.  It predominantly becomes a state issue instead of a federal issue. Congressman Cicilline should be implored to cosponsor and promote this very reasonable piece of legislation or be held accountable on September 9th 2014.

I support the Respect States’ and Citizens’ Rights Act because for far too long, people have been thrown in jail for infractions that hurt few and cause limited, if any, collateral damage to society at large. From my stand point, this incremental act does not go far enough, but as they say, ‘perfect is the enemy of good enough.’

Regunberg’s pledge: Let’s not go negative in House D4 race


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

RegunbergAaron Regunberg, the progressive candidate to fill Gordon Fox’s vacant District 4 House seat, wants to get the negativity out of the campaign.

So he’s asked his two opponents to sign what he calls a “Clean Campaign Pledge” which a press release from his campaign says “would require signers to refrain from negative attacks and maintain a high level of honest debate in the race to succeed Gordon Fox.”

Regunberg explained in the release: “Everywhere I go in our district, community members are talking about the need for ethics reform and clean elections in Rhode Island, and are fed up with the negative mudslinging that has become too common in politics today. If we believe in open, honest and transparent elections, then let’s commit to refrain from engaging in these attacks. I have enjoyed running alongside the other committed, intelligent candidates in the race for State Representative.”

So far, one of his two opponents has agreed. Heather Tow-Yick, another young Democrat vying for the District 4 House seat, agreed to sign Regunberg’s pledge, according to her spokesman Rob Horowitz.

“Heather Tow-Yick  looks forward to a clean, constructive, but spirited campaign about the major challenges facing the East Side, Providence and Rhode Island and which of the candidates’  real world experience and accomplishments makes them the best prepared to turn progressive values into practical results,” he said. “That is a contest we are confident of winning.”

Miriam Ross, the third Democrat vying for Fox’s former seat, did not respond to an email yesterday.

UPDATE: Ethan Gyles is also running for this seat, as an independent. He reached out on Twitter and said he likes the idea of a clean campaign and would be contacting Regunberg about it.

What did we learn from Gist’s dissertation?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

gistIn Deborah Gist’s dissertation, which the Providence Journal reports on this morning, Rhode Island commissioner of education writes that the firing of the Central Falls teachers was “the most difficult experience and greatest challenge for me personally and professionally throughout the case study period.”

She writes, “Trust was at the heart of the issue in Central Falls… There was also a lack of what is known as ‘collective efficacy’ in which each team member believes that the shared effort of the team will result in a positive result…”

So has Rhode Island’s often polarizing education chief learned much about building trust and engendering collective efficacy since studying this situation as part of her U Penn doctorate?

She lied to teacher and state Sen. Jim Sheehan about it in an email and then told me “I have already spent more time on this than I have or care to spend.”

But she managed to find some time now that Sheehan and I helped bring the matter to the Providence Journal’s attention. Gist gave an interview this week to the Journal this week, which reported the embargo has been lifted on her dissertation (I’m not sure that’s accurate). It’s a puff piece, replete with somewhat misleading passages such as this one:

“Critics have painted Gist as a leader who surrounded herself with like-minded thinkers. But the leader she describes in these pages wants nothing more than the trust of her staff and Rhode Island’s teachers. In fact, she talks about creating a work environment built around love, a place ‘full of joy where people laugh and have fun.'”

As a point of fact, Gist critics (and, really, anyone paying close attention to education politics) know she isn’t surrounded by like-minded thinkers at the Department of Education. Even the dissertation reports that Gist kept current RIDE staff instead of replacing them, as was suggested to her by the Broad Foundation (p. 76). And it’s well-regarded as fact that Gist done little in Rhode Island to create a place “full of joy where people laugh and have fun.”

To this end, Gist’s dissertation and the difficulty the public had in gleaning its substance, is a study in leadership.

Indeed, Gist herself thought to include in her dissertation a quote attributed union leader Marcia Rebak: “Commissioner Gist, teachers in the state of Rhode Island have trust issues with you.”

You can read most of Gist’s dissertation below, save for about 40 pages I wasn’t able to obtain:

Gist Dissertation Select Chapters

Emergency Solidarity Rally in support of Israel


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_4007The Jewish Alliance of Greater Rhode Island held an “Emergency Solidarity Rally” on Wednesday night at the JCC on Elmgrove Avenue in Providence in support of the State of Israel during the present military crisis in Gaza.

The event was marked by prayers and songs from religious leaders as well as reports from Naomi Sommer, an Israeli teen staying Providence and Maor Mintz, who lives in a Kibbutz only a mile or so outside Gaza. Both spoke about the difficulties of living under the threat of rocket attacks and of the fear for their loved ones back home.

Opinions on the policies pursued by the State of Israel in Gaza were mixed. While virtually all of the four hundred people present felt that Israel has a right to defend itself and wished for a peaceful settlement to the current war, there were some disagreements among the attendees as to what exactly Israel’s course of action should be. As Marty Cooper, director of the Community Relations Council pointed out, in a room of 400 people there are probably 800 opinions about Israel in regard to the current crisis.

Rabbi Sarah Mack, president of the Board of Rabbis of Greater Rhode Island, prefaced her opening prayer for peace with the observation that, “We stand with Israel in all its shades of gray.”

Rabbi Michelle Dardashti explored some of the darker shades of gray when she read a poem that explored the suffering of first the Israeli and then the Gazan people. Dardashti told the crowd that, “It’s easier for us to hear the first part of [the poem] about our people suffering, and it’s very scary and hard for us to look at the images of the Gazans crying and bleeding and suffering. We do have a right and an obligation to defend ourselves, and we also have an obligation, I believe, to defend our hearts from hardening.”

In response, there were a very few cries of “No!” as some in the crowd refused the Rabbi’s call for compassion.

Still, as Rabbi Dardashti led those assembled in a prayer for peace, all but a very few stood in prayer with her. In the end, at this rally for solidarity, compassionate hearts prevailed.

Would that such hearts could prevail in the Middle East.

DSC_3935

DSC_3936

DSC_3939

DSC_3946

DSC_3951

DSC_3958

DSC_3960

DSC_3968

DSC_3971

DSC_3975

DSC_3990

DSC_3997

DSC_4017

The full video of the Emergency Solidarity Rally can be seen here:

Nellie Gorbea: experience matters for next secretary of state


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Nellie Gorbea, one of two Democratic candidates for secretary of state, concedes there aren’t many policy differences between her and her from primary opponent Guillaume de Ramel. But experience for the job, the former deputy secretary of state and Housing Works RI executive director says, is another matter.

nellie1

“Because in the end,” Gorbea told me in a 45 minute interview earlier this week, “leadership matters and experience matters and I have a proven track record for doing what I say.”

Later in our conversation she described the experience difference between her and de Ramel as being “fairly striking.”

Gorbea was born and raised in Puerto Rico and moved to the mainland to attend Princeton, where she met her future husband. After she got her master’s degree in public adminstration from Columbia, he got a job as a professor at URI’s world-renowned Graduate School of Oceanography. They now live in near Wickford and have three daughters, ages 10, 8 and 4. We talked about how she became a Rhode Islander, and how RI and PR a lot alike in their cultures.

We talked about election reforms she would push for as secretary as state, such as repealing the voter ID law and implementing online voter registration. She said there are some draw backs to vote-by-mail.

Gorbea has a wealth of public and private sector experience. Before she was the executive director of Housing Works RI she was a deputy secretary of state under Matt Brown. In that capacity, she helped to publish online voting and public meeting information. She sued the General Assembly – and won – over a redistricting infraction in South Providence. And she was in management at the secretary of state’s office when it became a union shop.

She said it helped improve efficiency, employee relations and consumer experience in the office. Listen to her talk about the experience here:

While Gorbea wouldn’t tell me who she is supporting for other statewide offices, she did offer her opinion on how Ralph Mollis has done as secretary of state:

One of the most interesting and candid conversations we had was about her K Street fundraiser with Bill Richardson.

But aside from her experience in the office and a bona fide progressive track record, Gorbea is suffering from a severe fundraising disadvantage. She promised to have a TV presence before the primary, but knows she can’t match de Ramel’s ability to pay for advertising. Instead she boasts that her campaign is grassroots-funded by Rhode Islanders in every city and town in the state.

She said if there’s one thing Rhode Islanders should know about her campaign it’s this:

Here’s our full 45 minute interview (with some minor edits):

Reed fights tax incentives to move jobs overseas


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Sen Reed speaks at New England Tech earlier this week about a new program to train boat builders.
Sen Reed speaks at New England Tech earlier this week about a new program to train boat builders.

“Most folks agree that paying companies to relocate American jobs overseas makes no sense,” said Senator Jack Reed, about Senate Bill 2569, the Bring Jobs Home Act. It would end a tax loophole for compensates companies for moving expenses when they move jobs overseas and instead reward companies that bring jobs back stateside.

But some Senate Republicans didn’t think this made sense when Reed co-sponsored the bill in 2012. In July of that year it was killed by a GOP filibuster in spite having four Republican backers. But Senators Reed and Sheldon Whitehouse are hoping it can pass this summer, free of the politics of a presidential campaign.

“Now, the Senate has a chance to close this loophole and open a new chapter of bipartisan, commonsense cooperation,” Reed said in a statement. “This kind of straight-forward legislation deserves a swift up or down vote.  I hope we can get bipartisan cooperation to improve our economy and give American-based companies and workers a competitive advantage in the global marketplace.”

Here’s how Reed’s office described the bill:

The Bring Jobs Home Act will close a tax loophole that pays the moving expense of companies which send jobs overseas.  Under the current tax code, the cost of moving personnel and components of a company to a new location is defined as a business expense that qualifies for a tax deduction.  The Reed-backed bill will keep this deduction in place for companies that bring jobs and business activity back to the United States, but businesses would no longer be able to claim a tax benefit for shipping jobs overseas.  The bill also creates a new tax cut to provide an incentive for companies to bring jobs back to America.  Specifically, it would allow companies to qualify for a tax credit equal to 20% of the cost associated with bringing jobs back to the United States.

The Senate voted today to re-open debate on the bill. Reed, Whitehouse and their allies now have 30 hours to muster up 60 Senate votes to avoid another filibuster.

Until then, your tax dollars are helping companies leave the country.

“From the Old Slater Mill in Pawtucket to modern submarine production at Quonset Point, the manufacturing sector has always been central to Rhode Island’s economy,” Whitehouse said in a statement.  “It’s time to stop rewarding companies for shipping jobs overseas and start rewarding them for bringing jobs back home.  Rhode Island taxpayers shouldn’t be footing the bill to help create jobs in other countries.”

 

What can RI, ProJo expect from GateHouse?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

ProjoI was a just journalism student at URI when the Providence Journal was sold to Belo in 1997. Linda Levin was the best professor we had, and her schtick was regaling us with stories of her and her husband Len Levin’s glory days in the ProJo newsroom. She was outwardly devastated. I was made to understand this didn’t bode well for my chances of taking over Bill Reynold’s For What It’s Worth Column after graduation.

Before I even had a diploma, I had already been through a newspaper sale myself. The previous summer I interned for the Block Island Times when it was purchased by Jamestown Press owner Jeff McDonough. And ever since then, I’ve spent what seems like the bulk of my career being either bought or sold.

I left the Ashland Daily Tidings when Rupert Murdoch bought our parent company, and ended up at the Brattleboro Reformer, which MediaNews Group had recently acquired. My new beat required the labor two employees performed under the previous owner. I left that job to launch a community news site in East Greenwich, which was soon sold to Patch. So I took a job at WPRO, and was downsized when the talk radio station’s parent company was swallowed by Citadel Broadcasting. In seven years, I’ve been either one step ahead of or behind no fewer than four media mergers and/or acquisitions.

So pardon me if after 17 years of learning that they almost always eventually lead to downsizing, if I’m not as “excited” for the second sale of the Providence Journal as is Michael Reed. He’s the president of New Media Investment Group, the ProJo’s soon-to-be owner. He said in a press release: “We are very excited to welcome the paper, its employees and the community into the growing New Media family.”

He should be excited. He just paid $46 million for what the Metcalf family begrudgingly sold for $1.5 billion in 1997. Belo also got some TV stations when they bought in ’97 (which it has long ago spun off) and will hold on to the Fountain Street real estate in this sale. Some think New Media paid a premium (Rhode Islanders know it got a great deal!).

And how about us Rhode Islanders, and our trusted Providence Journal reporters? We know Reed is excited to have us in his life, but should we be equally excited to have him in ours?

Probably not.

New Media Investment Group is the internet-y sounding alias for GateHouse, and GateHouse is known as one of the worst employers in the newspaper industry. It owns close to 500 newspapers around the country, and I’ve never, ever heard of a newspaper improving when GateHouse takes over. Though I believe they often become more profitable. Google GateHouse and it’s too easy to find tales of rampant layoffs and Dickensian cost cutting – journalists have been known to lose both their newsroom coffee, and also their copy desk!

But the new boss has something very unique in the Providence Journal. Something the Metcalf family was able to tap into much more effectively than Belo ever did. The new boss doesn’t own another metro market-leading news platform, and Rhode Island, with its city-state like community, is unlike any other state-wide media market. It’s very reasonable to assume Michael Reed would want develop a unique approach to this unique asset.

Maybe the new boss will look to John Henry and the Boston Globe for inspiration, and invest in The Providence Journal rather than divest?

Sign up for Park(ing) Day!


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Park(ing) Day was started in San Francisco, but has since spread to every continent except Antarctica. It came to Providence last year, a bit late, but with a bang. For a city of a few hundred thousand people, Providence’s turnout of 35 parklets was head and shoulders above other East Coast cities on a per capita basis, coming close to matching cities like Philadelphia on a numerical one as well.

The purpose of Park(ing) Day is to temporarily repurpose parking spaces as something other than parking, in order to draw attention to the large areas of our cities oriented towards cars. When parking and streets are taken into account, cities like Providence allocate more than fifty percent of their downtowns to cars, and often even more space in the outer neighborhoods. Parking policy has strong correlations to housing affordability (extra parking raises the cost of housing) and transportation sustainability (it also greatly encourages driving).

This year’s Park(ing) Day will be upping the ante, and we need you to be a part of it! Broadway in Providence will be getting the state’s first-ever protected bike lane in the northside parking lane for the day in order to show ways that our streets can be better organized. The hope is that businesses and residents will be able to see ideas tested out without having to commit to them permanently. So-called “tactical urbanism” trumps bureaucracy any day.

Residents and businesses are asked to contribute their ideas and elbow grease to setting up mini-parks called “parklets” next to the protected bike lane. There will also be many parklet locations in Downcity, adding green space to the downtown.

2014’s Park(ing) Day comes on the heals of some let-downs in Providence politics. The state government shoved through a paving of the State House lawn for free state employee parking in fall, ignoring laws on the books requiring it to incentivize employees away from driving to work. Then in May, Halitosis Hall voted to extend $43 million plus interest payments for the as-yet-unbuilt Garrahy Garage. While stopping the garage is a longshot, Park(ing) Day focuses on aligning transportation policies so that cars are not subsidized. These setbacks should embolden us.

Participation in Park(ing) Day is free, but we highly appreciate donations to help pay for materials and permitting costs. You can sign up by visiting the Rhode Island chapter of the American Society of Landscape Architects’ website: rhodeislandasla.org/parkingday.

RIPDA announces legislative endorsements


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

cropped-ripdalogoThe Rhode Island Progressive Democrats last night voted to endorse 17 candidates in General Assembly elections. Here’s the list of the 17 candidates (only six men!) from around Rhode Island who earned their endorsement:

  • Edie Ajello, Providence, House District 1
  • Joe Almeida, Providence, House District 12
  • Dave Bennett, Warwick, House District 20
  • Lauren Carson, Newport, House District 75
  • Maria Cimini, Providence, House District 7
  • Cathie Cool Rumsey, Charlestown, Richmond, Hopkinton, Exeter, West Greenwich, Senate District 34
  • Doris De Los Santos, Providence, N. Providence, Senate District 7
  • Dave Fasteson, Smithfield, North Providence, Johnston, Senate District 22
  • Linda Finn, Middletown, Portsmouth, House District 72
  • Gayle Goldin, Providence, Senate District 3
  • Shelby Maldonado, Central Falls, House District 56
  • Margaux Morisseau, Coventry, Foster, Scituate, West Greenwich, Senate District 21
  • Aaron Regunberg, Providence, House District 4
  • Adam Satchell, West Warwick, Senate District 9
  • Jennifer Siciliano, Warwick, House District 22 (Frank Ferri’s seat)
  • Teresa Tanzi, Narragansett, Peacedale, Wakefield, House District 34
  • Larry Valencia, Richmond, Exeter, Hopkington, House District 39
Here’s their full press release:

Being a real Democrat in the General Assembly is not easy. The Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate both oppose a woman’s right to choose and received endorsements from Right to Life last election cycle. In 2012, they also both received endorsements from the NRA, who gave them A ratings and thousands of dollars of illegal campaign contributions over the course of their careers. Both of them are staunchly opposed to repealing the 2006 income tax cuts for the rich. On far too many core issues, the leadership of the General Assembly Democrats sides with the national Republican Party over the national Democratic Party. But the candidates we have endorsed fight for true Democratic Party values.

The battle between the two wings of the Rhode Island Democratic Party is often characterized as part of the national battle between the progressive wing and the Wall Street wing. We do not see it that way. The issues that divide the Democrats in the General Assembly—issues like reproductive rights, gun safety, and tax fairness—are issues where the national party is united.

When choosing endorsements, we looked for real Democrats who stand with the national Democratic Party on most core values. A few of our endorsees might not be considered particularly liberal in other states, but each one is a real Democrat. We are proud to support them in the battle to return our state to the basic Democratic Party values Rhode Islanders support so strongly.

Following these principles, we have chosen the following seventeen real Democrats, most of them facing competitive races, for our endorsement:


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387