Bus monitors speak out about privatization efforts


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Bus Monitors 03Projecting a tight budget, Providence school officials are considering outsourcing the school bus monitors.

The Providence School Board and Superintendent Susan Lusi are “seeking bids on buses and drivers, and also asking for an additional price for monitors,” said PPSD Director of Communications Christina O’Reilly.

There are nearly 200 bus monitors in Providence, who earn an average of $12.37 per hour. When public education outsourcing occurs a private company often hires back some employees at a lower wage and other new employees at drastically lower wages.

“Seeking this pricing in no way obligates the School Department to have the transportation vendor provide the monitors, but provides us factual information regarding costs,” O’Reilly told me.

“The genesis of this issue precedes the incoming Elorza administration by nearly two years,” she told me. But Elorza transition team spokesperson Marisa O’Gara said “Mayor-elect Elorza supports Superintendent Lusi and the Providence School Board’s decision to seek additional information regarding the cost of bus monitors.”

Mayor-elect Elorza and Superintendent Lusi should realize that it is the total cost of privatization needs to be examined, not just the savings that may accrue in eliminating certain jobs and lowering pay.

In talking to bus monitors on Tuesday morning outside the First Student bus lot on Ricom Way in Providence, I learned that the duties and responsibilities of bus monitors are surprisingly complex. In addition to helping schoolchildren on and off the buses, and making sure that vehicles are complying with traffic laws and stopping when the students are in the street, bus monitors are trained in first aid, trained to deal with special needs students (and parents), are there to help evacuate a bus in the event of an emergency and stand ready to protect children from those who might come onto the bus looking to do students harm.

The bus monitors I talked to have been on the job from anywhere between three and 20 years. They know the children they care for. They know the communities they serve. Parents trust the bus system because they know that the bus monitors are professional and accountable.

Bus Monitors 01When I asked the small crowd of bus monitors how many of them lived in Providence, every hand went up. Many are single mothers and fathers. Make no mistake: being a bus monitor does not pay a lot, but it pays enough so that the men and women I talked to can maintain their homes, afford health care and send their children to school. Bus monitors take pride in their work. They know how important their jobs are. They are aware that they play a key role in the safety, security and wellbeing of our children.

The bus monitors spoke to me about their disappointment in Providence Mayor-elect Jorge Elorza, because they feel that they supported him when he was seeking to be elected, but now feel betrayed that he is looking into putting them all on the unemployment line, or to force them to do the same work they do now but for a private company at a fraction of their current pay. They wondered why cost cutting is always placed on the backs of the poorest citizens. They are appealing to the Elorza’s humanity.

Bus Monitors 02Spaight O’Reilly says that privatization is not yet a done deal. “Seeking this pricing in no way obligates the School Department to have the transportation vendor provide the monitors, but provides us factual information regarding costs.”

The cost of nearly 200 Providence families suddenly without jobs in this difficult economy, signing up for various forms of public assistance, should be balanced against the few dollars an hour savings in salaries. A cost also needs to be found for the extra danger our students will be in as responsible, trained professionals are replaced with minimum wage workers who may lack the experience, motivation and training required to properly prioritize the lives of our students.

Privatization of public services too often results in tiny and temporary savings at the cost irreplaceable expertise and the hollowing out of jobs in vulnerable communities. I hope Mayor Elorza is wise enough to see that destroying people’s livelihoods is not a good first step on the sustainable path towards a revitalized Providence.

Below, a bus monitor makes her case in Spanish.



Support Steve Ahlquist!




Video: PUC protesters call for radical solutions to energy prices


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_8541As economic inequality grows in Rhode Island, the messages being conveyed to our leadership in government is becoming simultaneously more radical and more pragmatic. People are beginning to make the connection between economic, social and climate justice, and the changes they are calling for are nothing short of revolutionary.

At yesterday’s PUC (Public Utilities Commission) hearing on a proposed 24% rate hike by National Grid, state regulators heard testimony from 25 individuals, the vast majority of whom were outraged by the proposal. More than one speaker called the increase “unconscionable.”

Many pointed out the record profits scored by National Grid last year, or the $7 million plus salary paid to National Grid CEO Steve Holliday, as proof that such an increase is unnecessary. Others talked about the effect this rate increase will have on the poor, the elderly and other at risk individuals. Virginia Gonsalves asked if the PUC regulators were comfortable making people “have to choose between eating and paying their utility bills.”

DSC_8558
Santa Claus

John Prince, speaking on behalf of DARE (Direct Action for Rights and Equality) wondered if the PUC was simply a rubber stamp agency for whatever National Grid demands. “There’s no justice in this facility. I hope this doesn’t turn into a dog and pony show where we’re all here and you’ll just do what you’ll do anyway.”

Chris Rotondo, also from DARE, told the regulators that they are “being asked to subsidize National Grid profits,” a theme amplified by Robert Malin of the Sierra Club, who said that in the current economic atmosphere, “We socialize the risk and privatize the profits.”

The idea that this is already a done deal was a frequent refrain. “Why do you think National Grid has the balls, pardon my French, to ask for such an increase if they didn’t think you would approve it?” asked one woman with the George Wiley Center.

It was Jann Campbell of North Smithfield who brought the revolutionary fire.

“We’re facing a real spiritual and economic crisis in this country,” she said, before demanding that the PUC subpena National Grid CEO Steve Holliday so that he might defend this outrageous price increase in person.

In response to the call for a subpena, the PUC board replied, lamely,”We don’t have the  power to.”

Undeterred, Campbell said, “People can only take so much until they can’t take anymore.” And she added, “The day people feel there is no redress will be a very scary day in Rhode Island.”

The PUC will vote on the increase on Tuesday, December 23rd, at 9:30am in an open meeting at the RI PUC, 89 Jefferson Blvd, Warwick, RI. Think about attending, and let your voice be heard and presence be known.

You can watch Jann Campbell’s full testimony below:

Catherine Orloff asked why, if National Grid needs this rate increase, they are still able to contribute to charitable events like Waterfire. As much as we all love Waterfire, she asks, should our utility bills be indirectly subsidizing such efforts? Orloff then went on to compare National Grid to PayDay loan companies.

An expert on the psychological impacts of poverty on children.

“I consider myself to be low income,” said this speaker, “When this increase was suggested, I was terrified.” She went to point out that “very rich people never have enough money.”

“We need the opportunity to breathe.”

One elder care facility will see an an annual increase of $90,000 in their electricity bill, another, in Portsmouth, will see an increase of $72,000, Kathleen Kelly. These are people on fixed incomes, in need of continuous care.

Some of the testimony was filled with righteous anger.

And of course, Santa Claus testified.

Robert Malin, of the Sierra Club



Support Steve Ahlquist!