ACLU wants broader investigation in Cranston Police Dept.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

RI ACLU Union LogoCalling the findings of the Rhode Island State Police (RISP) investigation into the Cranston Police Department likely the “tip of an iceberg,” the ACLU of Rhode Island urged the Cranston City Council to call for further investigations into police practices and possible abuses of power against individuals outside the department.

In a letter sent to city councilors Tuesday, ACLU of Rhode Island executive director Steven Brown noted that while the RISP report was thorough, it focused on a handful of discrete, and largely internal, matters. Further investigation is warranted, the letter argued, because “the public deserves to know whether the improper actions so thoroughly documented in this report were, somewhat incredibly, the only such abuses to take place, or whether there were other unknown victims of these violations of the public trust.”

Steve Brown
Steve Brown

According to the RISP report, former police chief Marco Palombo not only hired private investigators to conduct surveillance of two police officers, but also briefly spied on a contract civilian computer technician. That spying also entailed police improperly accessing a DMV database to obtain information about the technician. The ACLU letter notes that “if police misused their access to state databases for one political purpose, the reasonable question naturally arises whether this was the only time such databases were misused.” As for surveillance of civilians in addition to the technician, another city employee alleged she too had been the subject of police surveillance. Though the RISP report was unable to substantiate her suspicions, Brown noted that under the circumstances, her concerns “cannot be dismissed out of hand either.”

The ACLU’s letter also pointed to RISP findings that police officials “improperly sought” search warrants for phone records of two targeted employees, and that the affidavits “appeared to be misleading to the Court.” At about the same time, Brown noted, a Rhode Island judge, ruling in a completely unrelated criminal case, sharply criticized Cranston police for, among other things, submitting warrant affidavits that contained “false statements that were deliberate or made in reckless disregard for the truth.”  Many of the “dubious practices” cited by the Court, states the letter, “seem eerily similar to some contained in the State Police report.”

These examples lend credence to the possibility that the documented “questionable activities used against fellow officers may have seeped into police activities against non-officers.” As a result, the ACLU letter called it “essential that further investigations be conducted to see if any of these troubling, and potentially unlawful, practices were utilized against others in instances unrelated to Ticketgate and the internal power struggles examined by the report.

The ACLU noted, as the State Police did, that the vast majority of police officers in the Cranston Police Department should not be judged by the bad actions of a few. At the same time, the RISP findings “may represent part of a broader pattern of police misconduct that cannot and should not be ignored lest it unintentionally promote a culture of indifference to basic civil rights that may continue to sprout in other contexts.”

As a result, Brown urged the City Council to “demand answers as to whether the police department, with or without the knowledge of the Mayor, may have engaged in other questionable activities against city residents since 2009, whether it was through improper surveillance, misuse of state databases, or other questionable undertakings such as those that have now been documented.”

This piece is based on a RI ACLU press release.

Protestors combat fracking in Rhode Island with Burriville power plant


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

After a fittingly stormy Tuesday morning, Governor Gina Raimondo announced a controversial plan at the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce to open a natural gas power plant in Burriville amid environmental protests and citizen complaints.

Protestors rally in front of Providence Chamber of Commerce as Gov. Raimondo announces Clear River Energy Center
Protestors rally in front of Providence Chamber of Commerce as Gov. Raimondo announces Clear River Energy Center

The plant, called the Clear River Energy Center, would utilize fracking to generate energy with natural gas. Fracking is a process that involves drilling into the earth, and then shooting a high-pressure water mixture at the rock to release the natural gas inside. Environmentalists have opposed the practice for a number of reasons. First, the process uses huge amounts of water that must be transported to the site. Second, many worry that dangerous chemicals used in the process may contaminate groundwater around the site. There are also concerns that fracking causes small earthquakes.

The company that is sponsoring and privately funding the $700 million project, Invenergy, says that the practice is clean and environmentally friendly because the new plant will prevent older, less efficient plants from emitting pollutants like carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and sulphur oxides into the air.

Invenergy has predicted $280 million in energy savings for Rhode Islanders once the energy center is up and running. There would be an overall economic impact of $1.3 billion between 2016 and 2034. Roughly 300 construction jobs would be added to the state’s workforce to build the facility, over a 30 month time period. There would also be 25-30 permanent, skilled positions to actually run the center.

“The construction of this clean energy generation facility will create hundreds of jobs while delivering more affordable and reliable energy to our businesses and homes,” Governor Raimondo said. “We are tackling our regional energy challenges, committing to cleaner energy systems in the long-term, and putting Rhode Islanders back to work.”

Even with this promise of clean energy, there are still many staunch opponents to the proposed facility. Fighting Against Natural Gas, or FANG, held an emergency rally in front of the Chamber of Commerce as Governor Raimondo unveiled her plan. Some even believed the facility to be a “rape” of Burriville’s air, water, and soil.

Robert Malin from Rhode Island’s chapter of the Sierra Club attended the protest, in opposition to the proposed facility. Malin believes that the government has been less than forthcoming with details for the project, and shouldn’t be trusted.

More protestors rallying against Burriville fracking.
More protestors rallying against Burriville fracking.

“The Governor has been saying that she doesn’t know anything about gas or fracking, and that this whole thing is just one little expansion that they’re doing, and by the way, we don’t have any money to build out the renewables, it’s a wish. Maybe in 20 years we’ll get around to actually doing it,” he said. “Then the next thing you know, they can dig into their pockets, they can pull out $700 million, and this thing that they’re planning, had to be planned in advance. They kept this whole thing under the table. Why wasn’t the public able to decide whether we want an explosive power plant building, bringing fracked gas, a deadly practice that was outlawed in New York state, that’s what we’re bringing.”

Malin explained that even though many don’t consider natural gas a fossil fuel, believing it lacks a carbon footprint, the energy source actually leaves what he called a “ghost footprint,” and still contributes to global warming.

“You’re trying to track a colorless, odorless gas,” he said. “Unfortunately, when it gets into the atmosphere, it’s called an accelerant to global warming. So, if you can imagine, you’ve got a big wood fire, and you take some gasoline and throw it on the fire. It flares up really quick. So if you’re not right there when you’re measuring it, when it flares up, then it’s very hard to track. The bad new is that it has the same carbon footprint as other fossil fuels, like coal and oil when it’s done.”

Stephen Dahl, from Fossil Free Rhode Island, said that Raimondo’s plan is short term, and that there are better options and avenues for the state to undertake.

“I think that is a very short gain that they are playing. In the short term, we’ll have jobs. For the longer term, if we follow countries like Germany and Scandinavia, and their mix of energies, in which we can build a transition to 100 percent wind, water, and solar for all purposes, both residential and commercial, here in Rhode Island, by 2050,” he said. “I understand that she has a limited term in office, and she wants to get something done. The way she’s chosen forward, though, is unfortunately, that short-term prospect, which will bring us more catastrophes. So, I object to it.”

Raimondo, and Invenergy’s Founder and CEO Michael Polsky both insisted that fracking, in combination with renewable energy sources, is only one of many puzzle pieces that can be put together to help slow climate change. According to Invenergy, the Clear River Energy Center will add more than 900 megawatts of new, cleaner energy to the regional energy grid, and will displace older, less efficient plants. It will also invest in well treatment and system upgrades, which will benefit 1,200 Pascoag Utility District water customers by contracting on a long-term basis for industrial water supply. Commercial benefits for the town of Burriville include millions of dollars in tax revenue, as well as the reduction of the property tax burden for homeowners.

Once approved, the Clear River Energy Center will begin construction in 2016, with operations scheduled to begin by summer 2019.

Emily Kawano on the solidarity economy


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
20150802_210634
Emily Kawano and Robert Pollin

Can Capitalism be tamed? Can Capitalism become more caring and socially responsible?

These are the questions Dr. Emily Kawano asked and attempted to answer as the other half of the opening plenary at the Center for Popular Economics 2015 Summer Institute in Northhampton MA, which I am attending all this week. Robert Pollin gave the other half of the plenary talk, and I wrote about that first, because it seemed to relate more to the recent news that Governor Gina Raimondo was announcing a new fracked gas energy plant to be built in Burrillville, RI. But  I didn’t want to pass up the opportunity to write about Kawano’s talk, which was eye opening and filled with possibilities.

Emily Kawano has a doctorate in economics and is the coordinator of the U.S. Solidarity Economy Network and co-director of Wellspring Cooperative. She spoke about transforming our economic system from capitalism to what she calls the solidarity economy.

The biggest problem facing our society is climate change, fueled by capitalism. Kawano mentioned the book The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History by Elizabeth Kolbert, which covers past mass extinctions (like the one that killed the dinosaurs) and argues that we are living through the sixth extinction now, and that the cause of this extinction is humanity, not a stray asteroid.

So, can Capitalism be tamed before the worst effects of climate change damage the planet beyond repair? Kawano thinks not. Capitalism can be reigned in, but that’s not enough. What is needed in a “big shift in our paradigm, a different way of being with each other and the earth and nature,” says Kawano.

We need a solidarity economy.

A solidarity economy is based on values and principles such as solidarity, cooperation, mutualism, sustainability, democracy, equity and pluralism.

The kinds of things that scare the crap out of capitalists.

A solidarity economy focuses on living well and living in harmony with each other and the natural world. It is, says Kawano, “a different way of thinking about the economy.”

The rights of the natural world, people, animals, insects, water, even life itself, would be prioritized. Human social creations, such as knowledge, spirituality (what a Humanist might call conscience) and art would be freely shared.

Governance would include such revolutionary ideas as participatory budgeting, community led development, collective ownership, regulation, restorative justice and democracy. In a solidarity economy unpaid work, such as the care provided by parents for children and families for the elderly, would be considered as part of the economy as a whole. Banks would be public institutions.

It all sounds like a utopian fairy tale, until you consider that once upon a time, a government that guaranteed free speech, freedom of assembly and freedom of religion also sounded impossible.

The concepts of a solidarity economy have been built into the constitutions of Ecuador and Bolivia. There are solidarity economy ministries in Brazil, France and Luxembourg. There is a United Nations task force examining these ideas, as well as the ILO (International Labor Organization).

The environmental encyclical of Pope Francis, Laudato Si’, is full of solidarity economy-like talk.

Climate change is coming fast. Economic planning is the most effective way to shift economies, markets are slow by comparison. Think about WWII, when the economy switched from a civilian to a war economy. That wasn’t markets reacting to end fascism, that was governmental policy.

The solidarity economy is about taking all these different systems, ideas and grassroots work and trying “to pull them together,” says Kawano. “The mainstream economy isn’t seeing it.”

On the local and grassroots level Kawano is talking about networks of worker-owned businesses, job creation in marginalized communities, local purchasing from anchor institutions and de-commodification through community land trusts, to name just a few ideas.

It turns out that economic revolution, like mass extinction, is hard to see from the inside. Did the people living through the end of feudalism and the beginnings of capitalism understand what was happening? Not really. They were buffeted by forces they could not understand or control, and the end result was unparalleled economic growth combined with environmental disaster.

If we had a chance to do it again, we would make different choices. That’s the solidarity economy.

Patreon