Just how racist are ceramic mammys and sambos?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

CO3iz_zWoAA21ZHIt’s been a year of enlightenment for some of us white people, thanks to the horribly illuminating videos of unarmed black people killed by police – nothing new for the African American community, but no longer something the rest of us could ignore.

Black Lives Matter made sure we didn’t miss this moment – reminding us that we as a country have acted as if black lives don’t matter quite as much as white lives and that we have failed to come to terms with the terrible racial injustices upon which we have built our nation.

It’s against that backdrop that I noticed some ceramic “mammys” and “sambos” in the window of a consignment shop the other day in my town of East Greenwich. I was startled. Can these caricatures of happy slaves actually be for sale – at 20 percent off no less – right there on Main Street?

“You treat them as a precious thing. It’s a part of history, a part of American history,” said  Lynda Peters, owner of Consignors, the shop on Main Street. Peters said about half of the people who buy black memorabilia from her are African American.

“What are we supposed to do with it – throw it all away?” she said. “Then it’s lost forever.”

Her store is hardly an outlier. This kind of mass-produced racist kitsch can be found everywhere it turns out.

“It’s a huge market,” said Nanci Thompson, owner of Briarbrook Antiques, an auction company in East Greenwich. “Just check eBay.”

Indeed, a search on eBay for “Black Americana” turned up 15,853 items.

Thompson likened the mammy ceramics to Nazi memorabilia – shocking but a reminder of where we’ve been.

“We should not forget that this happened,” she said. She said she has sold lots of African American memorabilia over the years, but said she draws the line at Ku Klux Klan items, which she referred to as “nasty.”

There are those who think all such items are nasty. In her book from 1994, “Ceramic Uncles & Celluloid Mammies: Black Images and Their Influence on Culture” (Anchor), Patricia A. Turner refered to such items as “contemptible collectibles.”

Turner is black; Thompson and Peters are white. 

Jim Vincent, head of the Providence branch of the NAACP, is black. For him, it’s the context that counts.

“If the person is trying to sell this artifact because of its historical nature … I see no problem with that. If someone is trying to ridicule a whole group of people, I do have a problem with that.”

Vincent does not own any of these mass-produced items but he acknowledges that “people might want to purchase it as a part of history, as negative a history as it may be.”

He added, “There are numbers of collectors, black and white. I don’t know white collectors but I do know black collectors. They’re trying to educate the public to our sordid past.”

James Alexander of West Warwick isn’t having it.

“To me it’s inexcusable for this type of, ah, ‘memorabilia’ to be displayed and or sold in this day and age. There’s no excuse for people to still cling to that as a memory,” said Alexander, who is black and has worked in community development for 50 years. “From my background, having grown up in the segregated South, that’s not how I would react to something like that.”

It’s more about what’s not been saved or memorialized that troubles Providence writer and producer Reza Clifton, who is black.

“One example I can think of, with roots in Rhode Island, is Sissieretta Jones, a famous opera singer who traveled the country and world, but for whom there is no archived recording, and who died ‘penniless.’ She was certainly alive at a time when talented white singers were being recorded and archived, so why not Jones? Why is it that ‘Black Americana’ art, with its racist intents and depictions, could be archived, restored, and passed around even today, while a talented singer – who represents something we can be proud of – was either denied access or deemed unworthy of salvage?”

Clifton said she thought black people might collect Black Americana because there is nothing else to collect (i.e. the nonexistent recordings of Sissieretta Jones). “What else are we to collect if we want to memorialize ourselves, our families, and our history?” she said.

And she equated the collection of mammys and sambos by some black people to the use of the n-word and bitch by others.

“There are many people who feel like, in using these words, they’ve reclaimed what have historically been negative terms. At the same time, there are some people who still feel like the words have strong, derogatory meanings because of their original uses and users,” she said. “I feel it’s important to leave room for both philosophies – especially when the work has been done to understand their origins.”

Phillip J. Merrill, who is black, is a historian, writer, appraiser and collector from Baltimore. He has made it his life’s work to use historical objects to teach Americans about our slaveholding and racist past. Merrill laughed when I explained my discomfort upon seeing the black ceramics.

“All of this material reaches the audience in different ways,” he said. “It’s shocking when you see it in a shop window, but this is an old conversation. It’s an old conversation with new meaning, because of the Black Lives Matter movement and because we have a black president and a black first lady.”

And Merrill thinks that’s a good thing even if it makes some people uncomfortable.

I meet people who are furious – ‘How dare you want to show and talk about stereotypical artifacts from the past!’ In order to understand how we got here, we’ve got to go back and look at the past. So many of us don’t want to tell it like it is,” he said. “All of these artifacts play a tremendous role in helping us deal with the past.”

As for me and my own personal awaking, Merrill had this to say: “You were sleeping like Rip Van Winkle and now you are awake. You should have been awake a long time ago. You were intimately involved with this.”

Friedrichs: The death knell for public sector labor unions


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

public-employees1It is no secret that this country has a miserable record in terms of labor unions. After the passage of the Taft-Harley Act in 1947, a bill that both exiled the Communist Party members that had been the backbone of organization drives in the 1930’s and ’40’s and put multiple prohibitions on labor union actions, they went into a decline.

So-called ‘Right to Work’ laws were rolled out across multiple states and infiltration by the mob created a culture of union bureaucrats who were inept, racist, and disconnected from the majority of their membership, instead set on currying political favors and enriching themselves. Now comes a new case to the Supreme Court, customized and written specifically for the anti-union majority sitting on the bench, that could very well serve as the death knell for public sector labor unions, one of the last great bastions of union activity in a job market that is overwhelmingly non-union.

On September 4, 2015, plaintiffs in the case Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association filed their petition with the Court. On page two, under ‘Questions Presented’, they ask two questions that come from the dreams of a free-market Libertarian:

1. Whether Abood v. Detroit Bd. of Education, 431 U.S. 209 (1977), should be overruled and public- sector “agency shop” arrangements invalidated under the First Amendment.
2. Whether it violates the First Amendment to require that public employees affirmatively object to subsidizing nonchargeable speech by public-sector unions, rather than requiring that employees affirmatively consent to subsidizing such speech.

The power of those two questions may seem obscure to the uninitiated, but they are the death sentence for the public sector unions.

The first part to be understood is the meaning of Abood, a case that has underwritten public sector unions and their rights for a generation. In that case, a group of Michigan teachers filed suit and claimed their free speech rights were impinged on because the union was collecting dues to engage in activities they did not agree with, collective bargaining and political endorsements. The Court found in that case that dues collection for collective bargaining did not infringe on free speech and that, while there were issues regarding free speech and union endorsements of political campaigns, the plaintiffs had failed to properly articulate their differences with the union, thereby nullifying their complaint.

Now comes Friedrichs. In last year’s Harris v. Quinn, a case the public was distracted from by the concurrent Hobby Lobby decision, the ground was laid in a ruling that essentially gave a huge opening for a future case by Justice Alito, who wrote:

The Abood Court’s analysis is questionable on several grounds. Some of these were noted or apparent at or before the time of the decision, but several have become more evident and troubling in the years since then.

From there, he went through a litany of flaws that essentially defined what would be required of a future case to void Abood. The New York Times wrote then:

The majority in Harris saw things differently. Making workers pay anything to a union they oppose is in tension with their First Amendment rights — “something of an anomaly,” in the words of the majority. But the real anomaly lies in according dissenters a right to refuse to pay for the union’s services — services that cost money to deliver, and that put money in the pockets of all employees.
Once selected by a majority of workers in a bargaining unit, a union becomes the exclusive representative, with a duty to fairly represent all of them. That is the bedrock of our public and private sector labor laws.
Unless everyone is required to pay for those services, individual workers can easily become “free riders,” taking the benefits of collective representation without paying their fair share of the costs. Not only dissenters but any employee who wants to save a buck can “free ride.” The net result may be that the union cannot afford to represent workers effectively, and everyone suffers.

In plain terms, the unions would be prevented from garnishing wages to pay dues used for operational costs, instituting a nation-wide Right to Work regime. It would be the end of the public sector labor unions as we know it. And even though he wrote an opinion on marriage equality that is now being nationwide in wedding vows, Justice Kennedy is a staunch libertarian, having sided with the majority of Alito, Thomas, Scalia, and Roberts on Harris.

This is a decision that would have an impact as resounding as a thunderbolt. Almost every federal, state, and municipal employee is part of some union. Professors at Rhode Island College and University of Rhode Island are unionized. The janitors, cooks, and other staffers are likewise. Public school teachers, bus drivers, even the mail man is in a union. After decades of union-busting privatization efforts, the Court would be delivering the anti-union movement not just a gift but a platinum-and-diamond-encrusted victory crown. And because the only remaining unionized jobs are private, that would either result in a mass-privatization drive or a high employee turnover rate as middle-class employees with families retreat to the private sector for better jobs.

What result this would have on the coming election remains to be seen. Hillary Clinton has played a major role in the decline of labor unions in this country, though for reasons that can only be called sheer insanity, the AFL-CIO’s Richard Trumka has indicated his refusal to back Bernie Sanders and has previously tampered down on union members involved in the Sanders campaign. While I have my own criticisms of Sanders that I am not shy about expressing, the Friedrichs case could prove to be the Hail Mary he needs to pull a miracle and sink Clinton come time for the all-important South Carolina primary, a heavily-African American state who most pundits think will halt Sanders for good. If Sanders were smart enough to make this into a campaign issue, he could create a few surprises still.

This Court decision may prove to be one of the most devastating in a generation, Dave Macaray at CounterPunch was not jesting when he wrote “It’s no exaggeration to say that for the American worker, “Friedrichs” could be as significant as Dred Scott.” But within the wreckage of a major defeat could lay the seeds for an American labor union renaissance. After decades of oafish leaders who make political decisions that benefit them more than workers, the American worker could turn a defeat into an opportunity to redefine unionism as we know it. The future is in their hands.

kaGh5_patreon_name_and_message

As the fast continues: Educating Raimondo on climate change


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
PeacePeoplePlanet
Peter Nightingale at the State House (Photo by Pia Ward)

“You can’t negotiate with a beetle. You are now dealing with natural law. And if you don’t understand natural law, you will soon.”

Oren Lyons, a member of the Onandaga Council of Chiefs, quoted by Mary Christina Wood in her book Nature’s Trust, sums up what’s wrong with our self-absorbed political system and its failure to deal with our planetary climate emergency in referring to four million acres of Canadian forest wiped out by beetles now thriving in warmer winter temperatures as a result of global warming.

Unfortunately, but not unexpectedly, our dear governor Gina Raimondo was too busy for an unscheduled intro to the laws of nature.  Too busy to interrupt paying back time for her campaign debts, I guess.  Thanks, ProJo, for your perfectly timed editorial Familiar Odor.   But please remember: Gina is an honorable person; so are they all, all honorable people.

Maybe Gina was doing the hard work of making sure that Providence will not be left behind, as—in city after city—we build what Frank Deford calls “Athletic Taj Mahals,” monuments for the “filthy rich.”  Thanks, Frank; you nailed it: Spending Public Money On Sports Stadiums Is Bad Business.   But do not forget that Gina is an honorable person; so are they all, all honorable people.

We The People who do not revolt against systemic corruption are the problem.

Since August 31, I’ve been trying to make an appointment with Gina to deliver a basic physics message.  It took until September 13 before I got a reply: “Once again, thank you again for being in touch,”  pretty pathetic writing that I should have received within three seconds rather than after two weeks, but no appointment.

The web site of the Office of the Governor is totally dysfunctional, but, dear reader, I’ll spare you details.  I just wonder, why should we trust people to run a state if they cannot manage a web site?  Of course, the problem in Rhode Island is not small-scale incompetence; broken democracy is what we are dealing with, but it’s not Gina, for Gina is an honorable person; so are they all, all honorable people.

Pia Ward, my dear friend, is the engaged artist who made the black-and-white photographs in this post.  Pia and I went to Gina’s office on Wednesday to deliver a pizza, a lunch skipped in support of Beyond Extreme Energy’s No-New-Permits fast in DC.

Peter Nightingale at the State House (Photo by Pia Ward)
Peter Nightingale at the State House (Photo by Pia Ward)

Of course we were told that web site was not the way to make appointments with the governor.  We have to follow procedures, no matter how many people have their lives destroyed or put their lives on the line in DC and elsewhere in the nation.  We are but a nuisance and who cares about Terry Greenwood?

One of Gina’s aids, who dutifully took notes of our story, instructed us that I had to go home and to make an appointment I had to send an email to the gubernatorial scheduler, Kelly Harris (Kelly-Harris@governor.ri.gov).  Never mind that we were already at the State House; the important work for corporate America and the filthy rich should never be interrupted, for they are all, all honorable people.

Report from the No-New-Permits fast in DC

Fasters occupying the side walk for an overnight at the FERC  Gates of Hell in DC.
Fasters occupying the side walk for an overnight at the FERC Gates of Hell in DC.

Ted Glick of ChessapeakeClimate.org and one of the Beyond Extreme Energy water-only fasters in DC had the following exchange with Norman Bay, the chairman of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).  Ted asked if the chairman would come down to receive the five copies of the Pope’s encyclical, Laudato Si’, on September 25th at noon. Bay said he would consider it.  We all know what that means, but let Ted speak:

Then he stopped and we looked each other in the eye. He told me that he respected what we were doing with the fast and the commitment it showed as far as our beliefs. He said he felt this type of action was a good type of action.

However, he went on to say that he really had problems with us disrupting their monthly meetings and asked if we would stop doing that.

I responded: “How can we do that when there’s no change at FERC as far as permitting gas pipelines and fracking infrastructure, one after the other, with virtually no exceptions.”

His response: “These are just pipelines. We’re a regulatory agency. Blaming us is like blaming the steel companies that make pipes. It’s the production of the gas that you need to deal with.”

Keep up the disruption, my friends; irritation makes pearls. Dear reader, if you ever have to explain Hannah Arendt’s “banality of evil,” this exchange would be a perfect starting point.

Events for the rest of our fast

Following up on the pledge to do three Ramadan-style fasts centered on each event in RI, Wednesday’s visit to the State House got Beatrijs, my wife, and me restarted fasting on Tuesday, after a one-day interruption. The following will get us to Friday, the 25th, when Beyond Extreme Energy will end its fast:

Of course, it’s not too late to call Gina’s friends at Invenergy to tell them that fracked gas is not clean and that they should cancel the fracked-gas power plant proposed for Burrillville.  Just keep in mind that Gina signed a contract with Invenergy, but Gina is an honorable person; so are they all, all honorable people.  We The People are the problem, we who think that the next fully-scripted ElecToon will bring system change.

Oh, yes, how about that pizza we took to the Gina’s office? As anticipated, it ended up feeding hungry people on Kennedy Plaza.

Peter Nightingale at the State House (Photo by Pia Ward)
Peter Nightingale at the State House (Photo by Pia Ward)