After the violence at Tolman: ‘What Now?’


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2015-10-15 Tolman High 001The twenty people, parents, activists, concerned citizens and students, gathered in the meeting room at the Pawtucket Public Library Tuesday night agreed that the police officer violently arresting two brothers at Tolman High School last week used, “too much force.”

“I’ve never seen any 14, 15, or 17 year old handled in that way,” said Alexandra, the organizer of the meeting. She opened the meeting by writing the words, “WHAT NOW?!” on the wipe board. It was the question of the evening.

Alexandra arranged the meeting and lead the discussion along with Marco McWilliams, who runs the Black Studies program at DARE (Direct Action for Rights and Equality).

The ensuing discussion was challenging and illuminating. Some of those in attendance were students at Shea, another public high school in Pawtucket. “Having a police officer is necessary,” one student believed, “because what if a student brings a gun to school and intends to use it?”

2015-10-15 Tolman High 007An activist countered that, “safety is different from policing” and then worked to disentangle the two ideas. “Developing forms of keeping each other safe is important,” he said. “We need to ask ourselves ‘Why are our schools unsafe?’

“Having kids packed into an underfunded school leads to tensions that leads to beefs that lead to escalation,” continued the activist.

This struck me as true. When I first went to Tolman after the incidents took place, I encountered students who were plainly nervous about the violence that that had occurred. They felt that the violence would continue, and continue to escalate. According to these students, the tensions surrounding the arrests, subsequent protests and further arrests had lead to tensions growing between various gangs in Pawtucket and nearby cities. The police, always to be avoided, were seen as extra nervous and vigilant.

The expectation of further violence was, “in the air” as one 15 year old put it to me.

2015-10-15 Tolman High 002Back in the meeting room at the Pawtucket Library, someone suggested educating high school kids about their rights and teaching the youth to prevent the kinds of situations where they might be targeted for arrest by police officers. An objection to the second part of this idea was immediately voiced: Framing this as “how kids should behave puts the blame [for police violence] on the kids.”

“Where I’m from we’re harassed by police, all the time, for no reason,” said another participant, “At some point your rights just don’t matter.”

When the topic of the violence at Tolman is brought up by students at Shea, “the teachers say, ‘we don’t know what happened before the video started,’” said a student, “and that means they think the kids deserve it.”

The teachers would have a different point of view if they lived in Pawtucket and sent their kids to public schools, said the student. Like the police in Pawtucket, most teachers are white, and commute to work from nearby or even distant cities. “They don’t come from Pawtucket, most of them, and they don’t care about their impact on the city,” said a student about the teachers and police. There is an attitude among public sector workers that the problems of Pawtucket can be left in Pawtucket.

2015-10-16 Tolman 002“I don’t know how to defend myself and my children as a Hispanic woman,” said a mother. She has come to this meeting because she can imagine her children being arrested by police officers as shown in the video, and she worries. Like everyone in the room, she knows the statistics about students of color being disproportionately suspended from school. She is aware of the school to prison pipeline, and she wants to keep her children out of it.

It is suggested that the presence of police officers in schools causes students to be pushed into the court system, sometimes directly, like the two brothers arrested on video. Policing schools makes schools unwelcoming to students of color. Schools can take on a prison-like atmosphere.

“The reality of being black in America is to fear the police.”

“I’m a black guy with two degrees and I don’t feel safe with the police,” said a college professor attending the meeting, “and that’s because of my lifelong interactions with police.”

The meeting closed with some ideas about goals. Goals include bringing elders into schools, retired grandmothers for instance, to “change the energy of a school.” Another is for schools to be community run.

But the most important goal is to grow the group and begin to effect real change. The tragic events at Tolman have presented opportunities that people are eager to seize.

Patreon

Race, racism, and STAR WARS


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Proving that stupid is a growing currency in our laughable excuse for a culture, there is now a boycott afoot that seeks to challenge the creators of the most successful film franchise in human history for their alleged provocation of “white genocide.”

As the newest STAR WARS film trailer launched Monday night, there also debuted a hashtag, #BoycottStarWarsVII, that protested the creeping authoritarian regime of a film being released by Disney. The Hollywood Reporter, always my personal favorite periodical for dealing with our tremendously racist society, ran this story to explain how high the intelligence of this silliness actually is:

“#BoycottStarWarsVII because it is anti-white propaganda promoting #whitegenocide,” read one tweet from an account calling itself “End Cultural Marxism.” (A subsequent tweet from the same account read “A friend in LA said #StarWarsVII is basically ‘Deray in Space,’ ” — a reference to civil rights activist DeRay Mckesson. “Jewish activist JJ Abrams is an anti-white nut.”)
Another Twitter account, calling itself “Captain Confederacy,” similarly griped that “SJWs [Social Justice Warriors] complain about White artists ‘misappropriating’ culture created by blacks but then celebrate a non-White Star Wars.” Yet another complaint read that the movie should be boycotted “because it’s nothing more than a social justice propaganda piece that alienates it’s core audience of young white males.”

Disney, who is releasing the new STAR WARS film following their purchase of the entirety of the LucasFilm Ltd. corpus from George Lucas some years ago, is now a haven of Marxism, cultural or otherwise? The irony is only matched by the stupidity in this statement.

Disney as a corporation headquartered in Florida is a major donor of the Republican Party, dependent for decades on a series of tax and labor law exemptions that make the operations and maintenance of their various Orlando theme parks tenable. The people who work at Disney are non-union laborers who put up with low pay and even lower benefits. There is a dog-eat-dog culture in the employee pool caused by the economic neoliberalism made manifest on Main Street, USA. Many of the performers who wear the character costumes are in fact low-paid student interns who use their jaunt at Disney World as a resume booster to ascend the ladder in the performing arts, striving one day to work in unionized theater companies. This ethic dates back to the days when Uncle Walt was busting animator labor union efforts and denouncing the union drive leaders as commies before the House Committee on Un-American Activities. The fact that the studio is responsible for a string of unapologetically racist cartoons during the Second World War that demonized Latinos, Asians, and Africans is icing on the cake. There are humans that actually think the folks who brought us SONG OF THE SOUTH, featuring a literal Tar Baby, are now all of the sudden Leninists?

Workers of the world, unite?
Workers of the world, unite?

Perhaps the best critique of Disney comes from Providence native Dr. Henry Giroux, the radical scholar and educator who was denied tenure in 1983 by Boston University President John Silber due to trumped-up charges and a blatant case of anti-communism. He has been engaged for the entirety of his career in a left-wing response to the neoliberal war on critical thought and education. To that degree, he has written valuable scholarship describing Disney as what Louis Althusser called an ‘ideological state apparatus’, a structure like the Church, major media conglomerates, schools, and other cultural landmarks that creates docility and obedience in the population. Here he is in a clip from the film MICKEY MOUSE MONOPOLY: DISNEY, CHILDHOOD & CORPORATE POWER, produced by Media Education Foundation.

He says later in the film:

You can’t get away, anywhere you go, from the products that are being sold and they all overlap so that if Disney produces a bad film, it doesn’t have to worry because, you see it, owns a television station, or it owns a television network in which you can run that film over and over again to massive audiences. Or, it can use its retailers to in fact transform it into a video and sell it in its video store, or it can market it abroad, or create a whole new toy line. Or, if we missed the point, it can begin to advertise it over and over in its newspapers, in its magazines, in it journals, so that eventually it will seem as if that really is such a wonderful product. How can it be in so many places? How could you miss it? I mean, so it seems to me it has the power to place that product, it has the power to turn every element of communication and information in to an advertisement.

That is what makes this accusation of STAR WARS being a radical film due to its multicultural casting so dangerous. By creating the notion that our standard of the Left must include a multi-national corporate entity with a profound and vile record of racism, sexism, misogyny, homophobia, and anti-intellectualism masked as anti-communism, we as consumer-citizens (and there is no real difference at this point) allow the cultural dialogue and intellectual discourse slide that much farther to the right. By doing so, we surrender that much more of our freedom and ability to think critically. And it is abundantly clear, when one looks at the curriculums of neoliberal charter schools and even public schools ensnared in the neoliberal net of Common Core, Race to the Top, and other bi-partisan educational ‘reform’ schemes, that the capacity to think critically is directly targeted by neoliberalism as the mode of governance that both the Democrats and Republicans abide by.

Of course, the typical liberal/progressive response is either to point out the obvious, that the STAR WARS series featured black actors like James Earl Jones, Billy Dee Williams, and Samuel L. Jackson, or to celebrate this shift in the casting dynamics of the Disney corporation. But that is a failure from the outset because it lacks in its critique a discussion of class and how Disney has, along with other major corporations like Wal-Mart, solidified the hegemony of neoliberal orthodoxy in the American economic order. The problem with simplistic identity politics that only emphasizing things that are skin-deep delegitimizes critiques of a Condoleeza Rice or Ben Carson for their obvious gaps regarding economic issues. That is not to say identity issues are invalid, far from it, but one must create a multi-dimensional spectrum that reflects class elements just as equally so to be truly incisive.

Perhaps one of the better critics of neoliberalism in the past few decades was the late Hugo Chavez. He took power in Venezuela and directly challenged Sith-like anti-Latino racism of the Monroe Doctrine with his policies. But he included in his defense of his people the vital issue of class. As a result, the world has seen a ripple effect across South America. Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, and Paraguay all elected populist leaders that have challenged the Disney-fication of culture, including economic culture, and mounted a powerful counter to bland identity politics that lack the class element. These are the real Jedi Knights. They have the bravery to take on the Dark Side of neoliberalism, which breeds by design a Palpatine-like imperial presidency. The fact they all come from humble beginnings proves you do not need midichlorians, just a level of insight into the way money, power, and empire work.

chavez
Our generation’s Yoda?

Even though one can call my own politics Leftist, this is not a Left wing position. The recognition of and speaking against neoliberalism is harkening back not to the Communist Party but the Democratic Party of Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson. Back then, the major Keynesian economic engine that pulled the country out of the Great Depression and created the boom of the 1950’s and 1960’s was our war economy, first developed to fight the Japanese and Germans and then turned against our wartime allies, the Soviet Union, in a Cold War that lasted until Nixon’s detente policies caused what was known as ‘stag-flation’.

As we stand on the precipice of ecological catastrophe and ever-expanding Middle Eastern wars caused in no small part by our dependence on fossil fuels, the Rhode Island Democratic Party now has at hand the ability to create a Green New Deal that would put thousands more people to work than a Spectra natural gas plant will, unionized jobs installing solar panels, wind turbines, hydroelectric, and geothermal electrical generation mechanisms that would create long-lasting, good-paying union jobs. As irony would have it, George Lucas has also been open about how the Cold War and Richard Nixon inspired his original STAR WARS stories. In a 2005 interview, he explained that REVENGE OF THE SITH’s purge of the Jedi was actually a fantastic version of Watergate and the infamous Saturday Night Massacre.

Do our Democrats dare enact the measures similar to our Latino Jedis and practice some actual democracy? Or will they stand by while our tottering Old Republic transitions into a real Empire? If it be the latter, we might do well to recall the words of T.S. Eliot, ‘This is the way the world ends/Not with a bang but a whimper‘.

kaGh5_patreon_name_and_message

PUC protesters repelled by bureaucratic disinterest


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2015-10-20 PUC 004More than 30 people entered the RI Public Utilities Commission (PUC) yesterday to demand an end to the epidemic of unfair utility shut-offs. Many in attendance have been victims of these shut-offs, even though they complied with the law and produced letters from their doctors indicating that their health would be seriously compromised by shut-offs. The protest was lead by the George Wiley Center and culminated in an action where dozens of protesters entered PUC offices to deliver a letter to the PUC board.

No one from the board would consent to meet with the protesters. Instead, Kevin Lynch, who works for the PUC, fed the crowd bureaucratic folderol for 30 minutes. (Readers with a peculiar masochistic streak can watch the entirety of that interaction in the last video below.) Mind you, this was after making the protesters wait in the tiny receiving room/staircase for nearly ten minutes. Ultimately, the letter was time stamped by a clerk before being filed away unread by board members.

Those among the protesters with specific issues left with those issues unresolved.

Though Lynch was professional and polite, he did nothing to resolve any issues that anyone in the crowd brought up. At first Lynch tried to dismiss the protesters by saying that since the George Wiley Center and the Rhode Island Center for Justice was suing over the issue, he would not be able comment, but Camilo Viveiros, lead organizer of the George Wiley Center, countered that the George Wiley center was not a plaintiff in the suit.

2015-10-20 PUC 022According to a George Wiley Center press release, “Every year tens of thousands of households in Rhode Island experience the stress of utility service termination due to unaffordable bills. It is shocking that in many of these homes live people struggling with medical conditions. This injustice is due to a loophole that allows the state’s Division of Public Utilities to grant National Grid permission to shut off households, even when their medical status is on file.”

The Wiley Center says such shut-off are, “inhumane and a threat to public health and safety.”

“Stopping utility shut-offs on people with medical conditions has been recommended by medical professionals who seek to protect and improve health,” says the George Wiley Center, “With access to utility service patients can be warm or cool as needed, see and not stumble in the dark, refrigerate medications, use nebulizers and oxygen tanks, take a warm bath. When service is shut off, basic needs are not met and medical conditions will likely worsen, sometimes leading to hospitalization and other serious consequences.”

Alan Costa has a medical condition that literally stops his heart a hundred times a minute. Without electricity, he dies. He fell behind on his electrical bills while undergoing two complex medical procedures in a very short period of time. He wonders why Governor Gina Raimondo doesn’t use her executive power, as the person who nominates people to the PUC board, to push for enforcement of laws that protect the health and well being of Rhode Island citizens instead on the profits of National Grid.

Annabel Alexander is 77 years old and suffers from a long list of ailments. (She showed me the list!) She has had her heat and her electricity turned off, and sleeps in her overcoat in her bed at night. National Grid will not make a deal with her to catch up on her bills for less than 50 percent of her income. “It’s a damn shame,” she says, “that we have to suffer while they are up there getting paychecks and living in mansions!”

In the next two videos we meet Kevin, who survived the Station Night Club fire. He pulled people out of that building that night, but today suffers from post traumatic stress and other ailments. On Saturday night he ran out of oil. On Monday morning his electricity was turned off. He needs to keep his medication chilled. He was promised that his condition would prevent a shut-off.

“I feel I’m being punished now, for things that people called me a hero for.”

Kevin was invited into the offices to see if there was a possibility of resolving his issue. He left disappointed, his case still pending.

Diane has asked her daughter for help with her bills. National Grid wants to take more than half her paycheck to turn her power back on. She has a host of ailments, and told the crowd that people with arthritis need a hot shower, as opposed to washing yourself of in water you’ve heated up in your microwave…

Camilo Viveiros, lead organizer of the George Wiley Center, rallied the crowd and explained the costs of these utility shut-offs in terms of human misery, but also in terms of dollars wasted.

Here is the full letter the protesters attempted to deliver to the PUC board, and it was signed by a long list of health care professionals, including Dr. Michael Fine, MD, former RI State Director of Health.

I’m writing to express my support for the Lifeline Project’s work to improve protection from utility termination for medically vulnerable households in our State. Unaffordable utility bills are especially prevalent among low-income medically vulnerable households because these households lack the financial resources to make ends meet and often require utility service for ongoing treatment of chronic illness. As a medical professional, I see first-hand the way that termination of utility service can lead to disastrous consequences for families such as an unexpected trip to the emergency room, the loss of a housing voucher, or eviction. Households with a permanently disabled individual, or a person with a pre-existing, serious medical condition such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, or diabetes, are among the most at risk because these conditions require electric medical devices or refrigerated medication.

The Lifeline Project is a collaboration between the Rhode Island Center for Justice and the George Wiley Center, which aims to protect and expand the rights of medically vulnerable households facing gas and electric utility shut off through the provision of legal assistance and community organizing. The Lifeline Project has identified a host of routinized, unfair and illegal practices and procedures on the part of the public utility company, National Grid, and the state regulatory agencies, the Division of Public Utilities and the Public Utilities Commission with respect to residential utility termination. These practices need to be fixed and in the meantime, medically vulnerable households need protection from shut-off.

I am specifically writing to support the Lifeline Project’s current campaign to challenge these illegal practices and urge National Grid and the state regulatory agencies to meet the following demands:

1. A one-year moratorium on termination for all accounts that are coded as ‘medical’.

2. The engagement of an independent third party monitor to review the Division of Public Utility’s approval of petitions for permission to terminate for all accounts coded as medical. The monitor will be selected by a joint committee composed of members of the George Wiley Center, the medical community, the Department of Health and the Public Utilities Commission.

3. The Public Utilities Commission immediately begin requiring data submissions from National Grid that are consistent with those requirements placed on the company in Massachusetts, as per the George Wiley Center’s formal request from March of 2015.

4. The Public Utilities Commission immediately begin accepting and thoroughly reviewing petitions for emergency restoration and providing timely responses to each request.

As a medical professional in this state, I understand the dire need to protect these consumers from the dangerous impacts of utility shutoff.

2015-10-20 PUC 001

2015-10-20 PUC 002

2015-10-20 PUC 003

2015-10-20 PUC 005

2015-10-20 PUC 006

2015-10-20 PUC 007

2015-10-20 PUC 008

2015-10-20 PUC 009

2015-10-20 PUC 010

2015-10-20 PUC 011

2015-10-20 PUC 012

2015-10-20 PUC 013

2015-10-20 PUC 014

2015-10-20 PUC 015

2015-10-20 PUC 017

2015-10-20 PUC 018

2015-10-20 PUC 019

2015-10-20 PUC 020

2015-10-20 PUC 021

2015-10-20 PUC 023

2015-10-20 PUC 024

2015-10-20 PUC 025

2015-10-20 PUC 026

2015-10-20 PUC 027

2015-10-20 PUC 028

2015-10-20 PUC 029

2015-10-20 PUC 030

Patreon

Providence Renaissance Hotel employees file to hold union elections


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

PODEROSOS! 02A strong majority of workers at the Providence Renaissance filed for a union election yesterday. The workers expect to win the election and proceed to negotiate a fair contract with the hotel owner The Procaccianti Group. The workers believe unionization will increase racial and gender equity in Providence.

“We are Providence, we want to be heard,” said Raquel Cruz, a housekeeper at the Providence Renaissance. “If this hotel company respects Providence, they will respect us.”

Said Hipolito Rivera, a houseman at the hotel, “We’ve been demanding for years that The Procaccianti Group give us a fair process to decide upon unionization. We call on the hotel to do the right thing. Treat us like equals, not adversaries. Respect us, respect the results of our election and negotiate a fair contract.”

PODEROSOS! 01

The typical housekeeper in Providence is a Hispanic woman making under $25,000 a year, according to the most recent census information. This workforce earns significantly less than the median income for both white male and female full-time workers (at $52,543 and $44,007 respectively). The most recent union hotel contract to be negotiated by Unite Here Local 217 and Omni Providence specifies that the lowest wage for housekeepers is $15.96 per hour, which would come out to over $33,000 annually.

“I make the hotel lots of money every day.  I should not have to work three jobs just to get by,” said Cruz, “I just want to be able to help my child with their homework.”

Data shows that union hotels in Providence break the cycle of racial inequity with higher wages and better benefits. Given the demographics of the hotel workforce in Providence, any increase in wages or benefits would disproportionately benefit women and people of color.

Workers at the Renaissance are predominantly Dominican. A poster developed by the workers indicating union support showcases the Dominican flag as a background to the photos of dozens of supportive Renaissance workers.

(This post is based on a Unite Here! Local 217 press release.)

PODEROSOS! 03

PODEROSOS! 04

Patreon