RI Center for Justice discusses lawyering for social change


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

RI Center for JusticeIt was a packed house at the RI Center for Justice as Executive Director Robert McCreanor lead a discussion about the collaborative work of community organizers and public interest lawyers in the area of social justice. On the panel were organizers and lawyers who work with DARE (Direct Action for Rights and Equality) and PrYSM (Providence Youth Student Movement) in Providence, and MFY’s Housing Project, the Three-Quarter House Tenant Organizing Project (TOP) in New York City.

What became clear over the next ninety minutes is that lawyering works in support of community organizing, not the other way around. What this means is that lawyers interested in social justice work need to “find the legal work that can support the organizers,” according to Shannah Kurland, a community lawyer and Soros Justice Fellow at PrYSM.

Kurland started as a community organizer at DARE, and struggled with her decision to become a lawyer. She was “not sure if becoming a lawyer was a right fit” and asked herself, “was it selling out?”

Michael Grinthal, supervising attorney for MFY’s Housing Project and Three-Quarter House Project, also started as a community organizer. For him, lawyering is a better fit, especially now as a father of a two year old. In New York, “all battles come back to housing because its so hard to live in NYC,” said Grinthal.

MFY “was the legal office for the welfare rights movement,” says Grinthal, making a local connection by adding, “George Wiley is one of the founding organizers in that movement.”

The funding for much legal service work comes through “legal services corporation” but under a law pushed through by Newt Gingrich (in a deft example of racist legislating, I should add) “organizations that get such money cannot do community organizing,” said Grinthal

Michael Zabelin, Staff Attorney at Rhode Island Legal Services and a lawyer who often works closely with DARE was never a community organizer. His work with the Harvard Legal Aid Bureau made transition to working with DARE “the obvious thing to do.” Zabelin twice mentioned the influence of community lawyer Steve Fischbach on his ideas around being a lawyer. Fischbach’s work around housing issues was instrumental in getting Just Cause passed a few years ago.

Paulette Soltani works with MFY Legal Services as a community organizer for the Three-Quarter House Tenant Organizing Project (TOP). TOP started five years ago to help organize tenants living in three quarter houses, described as an unregulated housing industry that pretends to offer transitional services for people recently released from prison or substance abuse centers. “They open buildings and pack 6-8 people in,” says Soltani, they sometimes “force the use of certain medicaid providers, as a form of Medicaid fraud.”

People living in these conditions can find themselves evicted without due cause. Often they are locked out and separated from their possessions. This can have the effect of sending these tenants back onto the streets, into homeless shelters, or into conditions that can ultimately send them back to jail or substance abuse.

As a community organizer Soltani must often deal with the immediate and personal issues of those she meets, “but the point of an organizer is to target systems” in addition to base building, outreach and leadership development. Her goal is to allow “people to develop their voices” as leaders and to work within coalitions.

Christopher Samih-Rotondo, Community Organizer at DARE and the Tenant and Homeowner Association (THA) agrees. He organizes low income communities of color in the south side of Providence. He works to develop team leaders for direct action and to effect legislative and policy change.

Samih-Rotondo spoke about Just Cause, passed because during the foreclosure crisis “banks became de facto landlords and would evict tenants without cause.” With lawyers his group “developed legislation to hold banks responsible for landlord tenant act.” The services DARE provides for individuals are done to “bring people in to form a movement, radicalize people, and change the system.”

Shannah Kurland doesn’t want this to sound too mercenary. Not all people who come to a group like DARE will stick around. Still, it’s important to help them. “Here’s a human being, part of our community, facing an issue,” said Kurland, later adding that, “a movement isn’t about one issue.” People who come one year to work on an issue like childcare may come back years later to do foreclosure work.

Samih-Rotondo thinks it is important to build individual capacities in people who come to his group for help. There are many things people can do without a lawyer, if they have the rules explained to them and can be empowered to act on their own behalf.

Soltani said that it is important for community organizers to meet “people where they are and understanding why they’re there in the first place. If they don’t come, ask why?”

For Sarath Suong, co-founder and executive director of PrYSM, lawyers have always been required. We needed “immigration lawyers early on to end Cambodian deportations.” More recently, PrYSM’s work on the Community Safety Act (CSA) required careful legal writing. The CSA has “twelve provisions that will curb profiling” and seeks to free people from “state, street and interpersonal violence.”

However, says Suong, “we know that policy will not save our communities. We know that communities need to save themselves, build a sense of resistance.”

Kurland agrees. “There are a ton of laws to protect you,” she says, “but they not enforced.” People in low-income communities of color learn that “here are your rights on paper,” now, “how do I stay safe on the street?” In other words, is asserting one’s rights in the moment worth the risk of being arrested or beaten?

When PrYSM started back in 2001, “only the police were engaging with SouthEast Asian youth” in Providence,” said Suong. PrYSM is based on Love, Power and Peace, and seeks to “hold Police accountable for the way they profile young people.”

The RI Center for Justice has a mission of “Protecting legal rights to ensure justice for vulnerable  individuals, families, and communities in Rhode Island.”  The Center currently works with Fuerza Laboral  on the Wage Justice Project, with the Community Action Partnership of Providence (CAPP) on the Tenant Advocacy Project and with the George Wiley Center on it’s Lifeline Project.

Patreon

Sens Metts, Pichardo ask RIPTA not to raise fare prices on elderly, disabled


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_82912015-10-19 RIPTA 001State senators Harold Metts and Juan Pichardo have requested in writing that the Rhode Island Public Transportation Agency cancel a proposal to raise fare prices on elderly, disabled and homeless riders. The two Democrats who represent poor areas of Providence wrote a joint letter to RIPTA Board Chairman Scott Avedesian, also the mayor of Warwick, and to Jonathan Womer, the director of the state Office of Management and Budget, imploring them to reconsider the rate increase.

“Hurting the most vulnerable is not the answer; and we can not support the proposed increase,” they wrote in a letter.

“The elderly and disabled who are also poor are the last people who should be made to shoulder the burden of RIPTA’s budget shortfalls,” said Pichardo, of District 2, in a press release from the State House. “It’s hard enough for them to put food on the table and keep their heat on. They don’t have money to start paying every time they need to go anywhere. This is going to have a devastating effect on their households, health and quality of life.”

Metts, who represents District 6, said, “Not only is this going to hurt the most vulnerable people financially, the result is going to be that these folks simply can’t go anywhere. Many elderly and disabled people aren’t able to walk very far, so this is going to have the effect of making them virtual shut-ins. This will isolate them on top of adding to their financial struggles. The effects of this plan are morally unacceptable, and RIPTA needs to identify a way to fund its services without doing so much harm to those least able to take the impact.”

Both letters are copies in full below.

The RIPTA Board has been considering increasing fare prices on elderly and disabled riders who earn less than 200 percent of the annual poverty level income to one dollar. Currently, they ride for free.

Here’s the letter to Avedesian:

October 27, 2015
Hon. Scott Avedisian, Chairperson
RIPTA
705 Elmwood Avenue
Providence RI,  02007

Dear Chairperson Avedisian,

We are writing you in opposition to fare increases on seniors and the handicapped currently being proposed by RIPTA to the Office of Regulatory Reform, under the umbrella of the Office of Management & Budget.  The sustainability of RIPTA should not be at the expense of the most vulnerable poor.

We have received several telephone calls from constituents and advocacy groups about this.  They are extremely concerned and outraged by the negative impact this will have.  The poor and handicapped need public transportation to buy food at the grocery market, keep their doctor’s appointments, etc.  This population is struggling as it is; and price increases for those on limited fixed income should never have been considered.

Public transportation is the only mode for them to move about the neighborhoods, city and state. As a result of this proposed action, people will feel limited and this will affect their mental state with added stress.

Public transportation is very important to the Rhode Island economy.  We disagree; however, with the March study on revenue and technology, authorized by RIPTA.  Hurting the most vulnerable is not the answer; and we can not support the proposed increase.

Sincerely yours,
________________                                                         ___________________
Harold M. Metts,                                                               Juan M. Pichardo
Senate District #6                                                             Senate District #2

HMM

cc. Governor Gina Raimondo
Speaker Nicholas A. Mattiello
Madam President M. Teresa Paiva-Weed
Mr. Jonathan Womer, Director
Mr. Raymond Studley, Director of RIPTA

And to Womer:

October 27, 2015
Mr. Jonathan Womer, Director
Office of Management & Budget
1 Capitol Hill 4th Floor
Providence, RI  02908

Dear Mr. Womer,

We understand that the office of Regulatory Reform is under your umbrella, as the director of the Office of Management and Budget.  We are opposed to the proposed 50% fair increase by RIPTA, submitted to your agency for approval. The sustainability of RIPTA should not be at the expense of the poor, handicapped and most vulnerable.

People on fixed incomes don’t have options.  This population uses public transportation to buy food at the market, go to their doctor’s appointments, etc. The most vulnerable will be severely and negatively impacted.

In closing, please reject this proposal.  Ask RIPTA to find a more suitable option that we all can support.

Sincerely yours,
________________                                                         __________________

Harold M. Metts                                                                Juan M. Pichardo
Senate District #6                                                             Senate District #2

cc. Governor Gina Raimondo
Speaker Nicholas A. Mattiello
Madam President M. Teresa Paiva-Weed

 

 

Media misses metaphor of Bernie Sanders’ political revolution


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Bernie_Sanders_2016Bernie Sanders gave calm, reasonable answers to the questions he faced on the Today Show this morning, explaining the fundamentals of his campaign. His responses were quiet and measured. He even failed to take a bait on whether Hillary Clinton is “expedient” for suddenly accepting a range of issues she’s opposed (gay marriage, peace, criminal justice reform, death penalty abolition and so on) for decades–issues that Sanders has supported all along.

Then came the big question.

Senator Sanders, you have all of us reaching into our high school textbooks to look up the definition of socialism, versus ‘democratic socialism’, versus capitalism. You call yourself a democratic socialist. In our last poll, 60% of our respondents said they were comfortable or very comfortable with capitalism. I see those signs at your rallies. They say ‘join the revolution’. What about those voters who don’t think a revolution sounds exciting, they think it sounds scary?

On the one hand, asking this question is understandable. Revolutions vary greatly in scope and meaning. The term can be used for anything from the American War of Independence, to the non-violent Civil Rights Movement; from Robespierre to Napoleon; from industrialization to the internet. The word “revolution” inspires feelings of warmth or revulsion across the political spectrum, but much like Beethoven’s 9th Symphony (Ode to Joy), has no distinct ideological flavor.

The question is, why do media outlets repeatedly plant the idea that Sanders is calling for something violent or destructive in his campaign (“scary”), when he’s repeatedly explained that the “revolution” is an electoral one involving–gasp–free public college tuition and universal healthcare?

The media have a responsibility not to support Bernie Sanders politics, but to help voters understand what his politics are, so that they can either accept or reject him at the polls. Asking such leading questions when, by the questioner’s own admission, many people are “reaching into textbooks” to try to understand basic economic concepts is irresponsible.

Being the resident transportation writer, I wanted to offer some examples of “revolution” that have been less outrageously received by our media.

U.S. auto maker Chevrolet was not the only car company to use the metaphor of “revolution” to describe their product. Fiat, complete with Halloween-ready sexy-Betsy Ross*, reminded us in 2014 that “The Italians are coming!” in its revolutionary ad:

Though the most touching to me when used as a promotional accessory to cars, “revolution” is used to sell other things that we all find non-threatening. Steve Jobs “kicked off 2010” by introducing “a truly magical and revolutionary product.” He was referring to the IPad.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KN-5zmvjAo

I’m not even suggesting that the use of the word revolution for these products is a bad thing. It seems a bit overwrought for my tastes, but on the other hand, IPads are kinda’ cool.

The largest blind spot for media outlets is not necessarily ideological. It may be that some journalists or news outlets actively disagree with Sanders’ program, or want to red-bait him. But more often, I would suspect that the bias is totally outside of the political spectrum. What it’s really about is sound bites. Media outlets are most successful with their audiences when they can instigate a short-term buzz over an issue, with relatively little effort into depth or clarity of thought. If the political buzz suddenly said Sanders was twenty points ahead, the media would oblige with a scattering of stories about how Hillary Clinton is in free-fall. It would sell. It also sells to constantly follow the drool trail of Donald Trump as he wallops his way across the country saying absurdly racist things (Extra! Extra!). The bias is in offering a poor platform for ideas, whatever their ideological origin.

Whatever the coverage of Sanders’ politics, sharp questions about “revolution” should not be part of the package. It would be perfectly acceptable, as some have, to launch into detailed analyses of Sanders’ platform and whether he’s the best choice. Picking on the candidate for using a metaphor that is common in American parlance is shallow, thoughtless journalism. You would expect that when so many of the advertisements on television refer to “revolution”, that this would be an easier lesson to learn.

~~~~

*Although, it’s probably not Betsy Ross if she’s hanging out with Paul Revere, but then again, I don’t think that would be the most historically inaccurate thing in this commercial. Where are the hand-stitched bunny ears we all read about in elementary school?