Pressure builds on Wendy’s to join Fair Food Program


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2015-11-21 Wendy's 016The Brown Student Labor Alliance, with members of Fuerza Laboral, visited another Wendy’s in Providence Saturday, to deliver a letter and picket the restaurant to demand “Wendy’s to commit to signing onto the Fair Food Program, a program that ensures that farmworkers are provided a living wage and good working conditions.”

The activists entered the restaurant on Eddy Street and presented a letter to the manager. After the manager accepted the letter the activists moved peacefully out of the restaurant and to the sidewalk, where they marched and chanted. This was part of a series of similar actions covered in part here and here. In accepting the letter, the manager of the Wendy’s kept the disruption of business within the restaurant to a minimum.

According to the Fair Food Program website,

The Coalition of Immokalee Workers’ (CIW) Fair Food Program is a unique partnership among farmers, farmworkers, and retail food companies that ensures humane wages and working conditions for the workers who pick fruits and vegetables on participating farms. It harnesses the power of consumer demand to give farmworkers a voice in the decisions that affect their lives, and to eliminate the longstanding abuses that have plagued agriculture for generations.

The Program has been called ‘the best workplace-monitoring program’ in the US in the New York Times, and ‘one of the great human rights success stories of our day’ in the Washington Post, and has won widespread recognition for its unique effectiveness from a broad spectrum of human rights observers, from the United Nations to the White House.

According to the activists, of “the five largest fast food corporations in the country — McDonald’s, Subway, Burger King, Taco Bell, and Wendy’s — Wendy’s is the only one to not yet sign onto the Fair Food Program.”

In a release announcing the action, the Brown Student Labor Alliance said, “With 14 food retailers now part of the Coalition of Immokalee Workers’ Fair Food Program, we are seeing incredible changes — from a zero-tolerance policy for sexual harassment and modern-day slavery, to access to shade, water, and bathrooms, to a real voice on the job — made real not only in Florida, but across state-lines. Just a few months ago, the CIW traveled up and down the eastern seaboard of the United States — Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, Maryland and New Jersey — carrying out worker-to-worker education sessions about these new rights for the first time ever with thousands of workers beyond Florida. With these changes, there is now a deep urgency for reinforcement and expansion of the Program, which will only be possible through more retailers joining — yet, corporations like Wendy’s and Publix continue to utterly deny their responsibility to farmworkers.”

2015-11-21 Wendy's 002

2015-11-21 Wendy's 005

2015-11-21 Wendy's 006

2015-11-21 Wendy's 009

2015-11-21 Wendy's 013

2015-11-21 Wendy's 017

2015-11-21 Wendy's 018

2015-11-21 Wendy's 021

2015-11-21 Wendy's 025

2015-11-21 Wendy's 026

2015-11-21 Wendy's 028

2015-11-21 Wendy's 029

2015-11-21 Wendy's 031

Patreon

The attempted coup at RIC


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

postpresidentNews broke on Friday that “[a] group of current and former Rhode Island College employees is asking the state Council on Postsecondary Education to replace college President Nancy Carriuolo, who they accuse of destabilizing the institution.” Yet those who have a rudimentary understanding of how the internal dynamics of Rhode Island College work grasp very well that this is a cunning, mean-spirited, and ultimately transparent ploy by a group of disgruntled former administrators who are trying to derail the work Dr. Carriuolo has done since taking office.

I feel I have several qualifications that allow me to speak here, I am the treasurer of the Rhode Island College Class of 2009, a former editor of the Rhode Island College Anchor Newspaper, and a former member of 90.7 WXIN Rhode Island College Radio, media platforms that covered the selection of Dr. Carriuolo. Since graduation, I have been keeping lightly abreast of events at my alma mater and have had several very pleasant interactions with the campus Dr. Carriuolo has modernized and the president herself, who has been absolutely wondrous. I also understand that Mark Motte, Peg Brown, and Jane Fusco are being quite disingenuous in their complaints, framing a basic procedural element of the transition between former College President Dr. John Nazarian and Dr. Carriuolo as some sort of totalitarian putsch.

Without getting into the personality-based mire that is quite ugly when discussing the length of Dr. Nazarian’s tenure, the fact is that the man was in office for eighteen years, 20 if you add the two years he served as interim president following the death of Dr. David Sweet, and had a total of five decades of involvement as a student, faculty member, and administrator when he left the campus. In that time, he created a culture based around his managerial and fiscal philosophy that made the college what it was from 1990 to 2008. When Dr. Carriuolo, a long-time member of the Rhode Island College community, took over, she brought with her a wholly different set of ideas and philosophies that have fundamentally redirected the trajectory of the college. I am not able to judge at this juncture what the long-term outcomes are because of the length of time she has been in office. But that change in leadership dictated Dr. Carriuolo also change the administrators and staff around her to affect her wishes for the college. The individuals lodging this complaint were part of the Nazarian nomenklatura who simply became far too comfortable in their roles. If the West Wing staff at the White House were to kick up such a fuss when a new president was inaugurated, people would laugh at such behavior.

I personally think that the things Dr. Carriuolo has spearheaded has been fantastic. Let me begin with the film department that I graduated from. Several years ago, I was invited back to campus to screen a film. When I entered the hall that I had taken multiple courses over my four years of matriculation, the large screening room in the Horace-Mann building, I thought I was at the wrong campus. When I used to watch films in that room, the sound was awful, the screen was problematic, and the tables with connected rotating chairs were, putting it politely, not the seating arrangement that works best for film students. Now the room has theatrical-styled seats with desktop side-bars, the sound is equivalent to the Showcase Cinema, and the screen is a marked improvement.

The department has been given the funding to expand and balance the curriculum in a way so that students get a fair dose of both film literacy and practical studio work, whereas when I was a student funding was so short one would be lucky to get four practical classes. If one did so, it was often the case they would take a few through the Communications Department, which has an orientation and logic sometimes completely opposed to the Film Department. Another time, I had a class on documentary film through the Anthropology Department where the professor included in the first class a condescending and mocking digression on those pesky ‘filmies’ that talked about all those weird notions that he had no use for. I respect and understand that, Film Studies and Anthropology are two different fields, but nonetheless it obviates a case where the Film Department was being given pittances rather than being allowed to flourish. Dr. Carriuolo has reversed that trend.

There are other places that Dr. Carriuolo has improved matters greatly. She has allowed Drs. Richard and Carolyn Fluehr-Lobban to install bee hives at the college as part of a project that has multiple applications for various departments and curriculums as well as the Sustainability Program and garnering praise from environmental groups. She has expanded the Non-Western Worlds curriculum in ways that are directly benefitting the greater community. For example, even though he was descended from West Asian parentage that spoke the language, Dr. Nazarian was unwilling to allow for Arabic language classes, something the new President has allowed for. In a period of time when our international affairs continue to interact with Arabic-language states, one does not have to be John Dewey to understand why one might like the ability to take low-cost Arabic language instruction courses.

The President’s Illuminated Walkway, installed to commemorate her selection, is a wonderful project that creates a safe pathway students can take to get across campus at night. When one in four female college students experiences some form of sexual violence during studies, this project becomes obviously a massive treasure for the community that will help decrease a terrible trend for years to come. Her streamlining and implementation of policies that guarantee students do not get lost in the shuffle of classes and end up wasting time and money over multiple years with no advancement, including things like the elimination of the undeclared major and greater emphasis on mandatory academic advising, is creating high-quality and better-educated students.

One of the projects that could very well be a major element of her lasting legacy is the collaboration with the University of Rhode Island in a nursing center at the South Street Landing. Despite the claims of Michael Smith, who has called it “a house of cards built on a foundation of ego, profit, and a profound lack of understanding of public policy”, this is actually a brilliant idea on multiple fronts. First, it helps better solidify the inter-institutional collaboration between the University and the College while simultaneously maintaining fealty to the unique character of each institute. The College has a fantastic nursing program while the University has a great pharmacy school, ergo creating an environment where both faculties can come together in one facility to collaborate without dragging both institutions through the disaster of merging them into a utopian Ocean State University is a very smart idea. Second, the presence of a major educational complex run but not one but two public universities is a powerful and long-lasting thrust back against the ethnically cleansing gentrification project in Providence that is fostered in no small part by Brown and Johnson and Wales Universities. This building will bring into the city working class and first generation students that do not have the scholarships, trust funds, and bad attitudes of the private school students. It seems obvious that Mr. Smith has misspoken about ego in this instance.

One cannot offer purely celebratory verbiage without critique and I will not do so. For example, I think it was unnecessary and inappropriate to even allow for a community dialogue about arming the campus police several years ago. I am not in love with the fact that the renovated arts building is named for the Alex and Ani jewelry company. Adjunct professors still are given low wages and can get caught in the academic quagmire caused by a lack of tenure-track positions in various departments. Yet on the same token, the individuals lodging this complaint are not active in ameliorating these issues, they are part of a leadership generation that helped create these problems. For example, when the gun debate was held during the Nazarian era, these voices were not in rousing opposition. If these are valid complaints, which they very well could be, these issues have been hijacked and utilized by individuals who have very little room to speak.

This issue is far more than just a personality conflict between a few disgruntled employees and a president. At the core of this move is a fundamental difference in philosophy regarding the role of the state in higher education. One school of thought would hope to see public education wither and die so to make a space for more privatized education and more difficulty for low-income and minority students. The other would like to reinvigorate the public education sector and create a culture in Rhode Island where everyone has the opportunity to learn and think critically. The former school also has a tendency to personally profit from cuts to education, putting themselves ahead of the students. It seems abundantly clear that faculty, staff, students, and alumni should stand in solidarity with Dr. Carriuolo here so to protect the integrity and sustainability of the Rhode Island College project.

kaGh5_patreon_name_and_message

Beyond the Lucky Charms version of Irish history


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

In a recent press conference opposing the acceptance of Syrian refugees fleeing ISIS terror, the Rhode Island GOP drew a contrast between the past acceptance of Irish refugees of the Potato Famine and the current, ongoing refugee crisis in Syria. Arguing that Syrians fleeing ISIS were different, Rep. Mike Chippendale said, “‘the United States of America is an extremely compassionate nation’ but added this is a different time than when the Irish came to the country because of a potato famine” according to a Projo report on the press conference.

As the great-great-grandson of an Irish-American terrorist, I feel the need to correct the historical record.

William Crossin, my mother’s mother’s mother’s father, died in summer of 1912. His funeral procession was a well-attended public spectacle, as reported in the July 6, 1912 edition of The Gaelic American (here I pull from The Gaelic American as quoted in a 1982 undergrad paper by Denise M. Hennessey, my mother):

It was “one of the most remarkable tributes of respect for the dead ever seen in Philadelphia. No popular public man was ever more honored in the number and quality of those who accompanied his remains to their last resting place. And they were all men and women who knew him personally.”*

He was burried [sic] from the Church of the Annunciation, located at Tenth and Dickinson Streets, Philadelphia which church “was filled to capacity.”

“A dense mass of people thronged Morris Street and the neighboring blocks, and it required a detachment of police to keep the space in front of the house clear”

Six pallbearers carried Crossin’s coffin:

John DeVoy

John T. Keating

John L. Gannon

Francis Reilly

Edward McDermott

Joseph McGarrity**

A procession of honorary pallbearers included the dignitaries from all over the United States. Fifteen nuns were also among those in the procession and it was noted that, “Crossin had always been a great friend of the sisters and made many a collection for charitable enterprises in which they were engaged.”

“A long line of carriages followed the hearse to the church, all the side streets on both sides of the route had a double line of waiting carriages and more than 2,000 members of the Clan-na-Gael wearing badges marched on foot.

A high mass of Requiem was celebrated at his parish church and a host of priests assisted his Pastor, Rev. P. Daily. In his sermon Fr. Daily attested to Crossin’s good character when he said, “No man can point the finger of scorn at William Crossin. He was a good Catholic, a practical Catholic in the strictest sense of the word. His performance of his religious duties was not perfunctory. His faith was strong and his fervor was like that of the Irish missionaries who carried the light of the Gospel to the peoples of central and western Europe in the Middle Ages when Ireland earned the proud title of the Island of the Saints. He was filled with the spirit which animated those men. His life was simple and pure. He was a model husband and father, a good citizen who won the respect of his neighbors and of all who came in contact with him. He was loyal to the land of his adoption, and to his motherland he gave a devotion that was without the slightest taint of selfishness Men might differ with him but all respected his sincerity and singleness of purpose.”

“The procession of carriages going to the grave sight stretched as far as the eye could see.”

“Outside and on the way to the cemetary [sic] great satisfaction was expressed at this kindly and eloquent tribute to the dead. One of the professional men at the funeral, a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania, said that he had never met a man of finer intellect, of more upright character or stronger personality than William Crossin. Had Crossin had the advantage of a college training, the man believed Crossin would have become one of the foremost men of America.” [William Crossin was a horse-cart driver in South Philadelphia]

The Clan-na-Gael was a forerunner of the I.R.A., which collected money and weapons for the latter group as it formed. William Crossin, one of the Clan-na-Gael’s leaders, presided over the country’s largest chapter in Philadelphia. He was an intellectual and personal mentor to the leaders of the Easter Rising, which took place four years after his death. He also personally took part in actions such as the dynamiting of a British cargo ship leaving New Orleans for British South Africa. In his old age, William Crossin successfully fought extradition to Great Britain to face trial for his actions.

My mother had mixed feelings about her great-grandfather, as do I (my grandmother did not, according to family legend. When my mom came home to tell her parents what she had researched at night school, my grandfather gleefully exclaimed, “Good, Denise! Dig for the dirt! I want to know everything her [my grandmother’s] side of the family did!” My grandmother replied–I imagine between sips of milky black tea and puffs of a Camel cigarette–that, “If any relative of mine blew something up, they must have had a goddamned good reason”).

History does not repeat, but rhymes. There are contrasts and similarities between the Irish experience and the Syrian one. The Irish focused their violence on the British, not Americans, and Britain was not at that time considered a solid ally of the United States***. Irish resistance was violent, and incidentally must have harmed civilians, but was not the sort of nihilistic terrorist violence that characterizes ISIS (though it later would become exactly that type of violence). In both cases, the vast majority of people were non-combatants with nothing to do with terror.
Of course, the biggest immediate contrast is that Irish-Americans deeply sympathized with Irish republicanism in all its forms, and the leaders of the community, though perhaps not in full harmony with the Clan-na-Gael and I.R.A., certainly considered the group within the fold of reasonable disagreement. Syrians, by contrast, are overwhelmingly fleeing from ISIS. The Arabic slur, Daesh, meaning something akin to ‘the dividers’ gives clues to how the broader Syrian public feels about ISIS. There’s no doubt that we should be careful to screen out ISIS terrorists who might opportunistically try to hide amidst the hoards of their own victims, but that does not justify punishing the vast majority who are fleeing ISIS.
There is also a longer arc of history to be considered.
The date of my great-great-grandfather’s death in 1912, makes for a convenient endpoint from the perspective of my family, because we as his relatives need not fully grapple with the complexities of political violence. Helping to form the early seed of the I.R.A. but not carrying out its full history is something akin to being at the storming of the Bastille, but not sticking around for la Terreur****. The Easter Rising in 1916 bore William Crossin’s political mark but not his actual hand. The Rising, in which an armed brigade of I.R.A. militia took the Dublin Post Office and a smattering of other British buildings, marked the beginning of a protracted struggle for Irish independence. During the Rising many people died, including forty children, but by the standards of later I.R.A. violence, the Rising was a targeted and humane affair. Over the next century, the I.R.A. would become ever more nihilistic in its targeting of civilians. The initial choice by people like my great-great-grandfather to even consider the use of violence came from the sense that no other option was available, and as the U.K. used repressive torture and mass-detainment measures against the Irish Catholic population, the movement became correspondingly more desperate and terroristic.
Likewise, the Arab world once flourished with democratic ideals and religious tolerance. The struggles that Middle-Easterners fought ranged from the nonviolent to the limitedly violent, and the outright terroristic. But it was repression that gave terrorism the upper hand. Our leaders chose to overthrow Iranian democracy in 1953 to secure oil, and throw that country into the arms of theocracy. Our leaders chose to put chemical weapons in the hands of Saddam Hussein and the Iranian theocracy alike (supposedly our enemy). Our leaders chose to arm the Taliban. Our leaders chose to use torture and trial-free detainment policies similar to those of Northern Ireland at Guantanamo Bay. British repression pushed republicanism to the point that its most extreme practitioners became more like a pro-Catholic mafia fighting for an Ireland for Catholics Only. American repression has helped spawn a vicious movement for an exclusionary, theocratic “Caliphate”.
British repression did not justify the I.R.A. Our leaders’ choices do not justify Daesh/ISIS. Irish and Syrian terrorism has historical roots, but is carried out by individuals with agency and responsibility. We must defeat Daesh. But above all, Irish-American history should give us a guide for why terrorism happens, and how to stop it. You stop terrorism by isolating and fighting the extremists. You acknowledge and address the legitimate claims of the general public, which can either serve as your ally our the terrorists’.
We should remember what Irish-American history was, in all its hues. The Lucky Charms version of Irish history results from the fact that the goal of a free Ireland is no longer considered extreme, and from the fact that none of us in America recall the violence and destruction that went into its creation. It poses a view that we are the rational people, and the foreigners are dangerous and other. We should not pretend that there are not real dangers. But by recognizing the full scope of our history, we should be able to make rational choices about those dangers. I owe it to myself as an Irish-American, my ancestors, and the world to bring this story to light.
~~~~
*It’s unclear to me at times who is being quoted in The Gaelic American. The author may have been quoting someone mentioned earlier in the obituary, or it may be a typo from my mother’s paper.
**Joseph McGarrity was one of the heavyweights of Irish republicanism, and his papers are kept at Villanova University, where at night school, much of my mom’s research was done. According to my mother’s paper, 1960s bombings by the I.R.A. were often accompanied by letters signed with the pseudonym “Joseph McGarrity” the way one might sign a letter “Thomas Jefferson”. McGarrity was one of my great-great-grandfather’s closest friends, and another of the Clan-na-Gael’s chapter presidents.
*** (which does not really make any moral difference, but is certainly a relevant political one)
****(which, ironically, is the origin of the term “terrorism”)