Does CCRI support Hillary Clinton?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2016-04-14 Clinton in CCRI 010It’s a fine line between campaigning for Hillary Clinton and introducing Bill Clinton, who was campaigning for Hillary Clinton. But CCCRI President Meghan Hughes didn’t cross it yesterday, the school said, when she introduced the 42nd president of the United States who came to the Community College of Rhode Island to help his spouse become the 45th.

“President Hughes was not campaigning for Hillary Clinton,” said school spokesman Richard Coren. “Nowhere in her remarks was there a mention of Hillary Clinton. Her remarks yesterday focused on the wonderful opportunity that this presented our students as they were able to witness and experience, first-hand, a part of the political process.”

Coren said, “With a former President of the United States appearing on our campus, along with many other state dignitaries, it was expected and appropriate for the college president to give welcoming remarks. Her remarks yesterday focused on the wonderful opportunity that this presented our students as they were able to witness and experience, first-hand, a part of the political process.”

In an email to CCRI staff, Hughes wrote, “While the school does not take a position with regard to any political race, we do open our campuses to political candidates. In doing so, all of us have the opportunity to gain firsthand insight into the American political process. I encourage those of you who are eligible to participate in the upcoming election to educate yourself about all of the candidates and exercise your right to vote this fall.”

Clinton paid $1,660 for use of the “lower commons” – what students know as the cafeteria. “The Clinton campaign was invoiced the standard space rental fee for the day plus the cost of an electrician and two security officers,” Coren said.

The invoice was signed by Edna O’Neill Mattson, the facilities coordinator at CCRI. O’Neill Mattson is also the national committeewoman of the state Democratic Party and a superdelegate who intends to vote for Hillary Clinton.

Burrillville Town Council seemingly at odds with residents over power plant


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Wednesday night’s Burrillville Town Council meeting lasted over three full hours, and though the council considered other business, the majority of the discussion concerned Invenergy’s proposed fracked gas and oil burning power plant. Anticipating a larger than usual presence at the meeting, the Town Council wisely moved the session to the Burrillvile High School, with its spacious auditorium. Oddly though, the meeting was scheduled for the school’s media center, which did not have nearly enough seating or microphones set up for people to hear.

Councillor David Place entered the auditorium, (which was set up with microphones and seating for the Town Council meeting) and marched everyone to the media center, only to have the meeting start with a motion to move the meeting back to the auditorium.

It was a poor way to start what promised to be a contentious meeting.

After getting the formalities of the Pledge of Allegiance out of the way, Council President John Pacheco III called for public comment. Attendees were warned that during public comment, the Town Council would only be allowed to listen, not comment or answer questions. In all, 23 people spoke during this time, all but one in opposition to the Power Plant. The one speaker who did not speak against the power plant merely wanted to remind everyone of the upcoming Burrillville Earth Day clean-up. (I’ve moved the 22 speakers to the end of this post.)

After conducting other town business, (not included here) the council got around to Agenda item 16-104. Town Councillor Kimberly Brissette Brown suggested that the Council hold a series of community workshops to allow the public to interact with town council members to learn more about the proposed power plant in an unofficial, less structured way. I’m not sure how unstructured and unofficial meetings between the public and town council members, outside properly held town council meetings is not an end run around the open meetings law, but we’ll see how this plays out.

Next up was Kathy Martley, of BASE (Burrillville Against Spectra Expansion), who has been fighting the fracked gas infrastructure in her town for two years. Martley asked a series of questions as to how the town council will deal with Invenergy, yet instead of answering directly, council members became defensive and even combative. Town Solicitor Oleg Nikolyszyn explained that the Town Council is powerless to stop the plant from being built.

Martley asked the Town Council to pass a resolution unequivocally opposing the plant, similar to the resolution passed by the Providence City Council regarding the liquefaction facility at Field’s Point. Council President Pacheco replied that it “would be very irresponsible to issue that kind of a statement.” He insisted that the council must “remain neutral” because “we appoint the zoning board, we appoint the planning department and no way in hell can we ever present information in fact that is not tainted and unbiased.”

Burrillville resident Paul Lefebvre asked “Was [State Representative] Cale Keable lying when he said you have to stop the tax deal?”

According to Martley, Cale Keable said that the Town Council should reject any tax deals with Invenergy as a way to potentially stop the plant from being built. (See a full examination of that idea here.)

“Cale has a different job than we do,” answer Pacheco, adding that he admires the statement Keable put out with State Senator Paul Fogarty opposing the power plant.

After this heated exchange, Paul Roselli of the Burrillville Land Trust asked a series of questions and made a number of requests for answers regarding the ecological impacts of the proposed power plant. Roselli seemed to irritate the council with his questions and points, stirring Nikolyszyn to insist that the experts hired by the Town will be on hand in two weeks to educate the EFSB, (Energy Facilities Siting Board, the body with the sole discretion to approve the power plant) and the public. “That’s the beginning of this process,” said Nikolyszyn, not realizing, I suppose, that it’s the process and the seeming inevitability of the power plant that most disturbs the residents of Burrillville.

 

 

 

 

 

Burrillville 06 Secret negotiations

Burrillville 07 Squeaky

Burrillville 08 Robin Woods

Burrillville 09 Not on the Agenda

Burrillville 10 Loraine

Burrillville 11 End

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 01

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 02

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 03

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 04

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 05

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 06

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 07

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 08

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 09

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 10

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 11

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 12

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 13

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 14

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 15

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 16

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 17

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 18

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 19

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 20

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 21

2016-04-13 Burrillville Town Council 22

Burrillville Town Council

Burrillville Town Council can stand up to Invenergy


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Burrillville Town Council
Burrillville Town Council

The revelation that the Burrillville Town Council, under the leadership of John Pacheco III, has been engaged in ongoing negotiations with Invenergy LLC over potential tax breaks for their Clear River Energy Center gas and oil burning power plant, came as a surprise to many Burrillville residents Wednesday evening. Burrillville Town Solicitor Oleg Nikolyszyn, in a comment on the piece that broke this story objected to the word “secret” saying that the negotiations he and Town Manager Michael Wood were engaged in were “due diligence” and “not behind anyone’s back, or in secret, but openly.” He also says that, “Until now, the Council has not been engaged or negotiating with Invenergy.”

Nikolyszyn feels that he and the Town Manager, “would be remiss if we did not take into consideration what financial benefit the Town would receive.” They are doing, “what professionals are expected to do in a business environment.” At the meeting Nikolyszyn said that the town had a “fiduciary duty” to enter into negotiations.

That’s not what the law says.

Conservation Law Foundation senior lawyer Jerry Elmer maintains that, “one of the most effective ways that the Town Council can seek to prevent the siting of the Invenergy plant is to deny Invenergy the tax treaty it seeks.”

Not entering into a tax treaty with Invenergy will not necessarily stop Invenergy in its tracks, the plant could still go forward and pay higher taxes to the town, taking a hit to their profitability in the process. Elmer reminded me that the profitability of the plant has already suffered two recent hits “when (a) Invenergy cleared only one of two turbines in the February 8 Forward Capacity Auction; and (b) the SENE zonal clearing price had zero premium over the clearing price in Rest of Pool, unlike the previous two auctions in which our zone cleared at a huge premium.”

How many more hits to the plant’s profitability can Invenergy afford?

At Wednesday evening’s Town Council meeting Nikolyszyn was correct when he said that Burrillville has no say in whether or not the plant gets approved for Burrillville. As Elmer helpfully explained,

The underlying reason that the General Assembly created the Energy Facility Siting Board (EFSB) by enacting the Energy Facility Siting Act (EFSA), was that it was assumed that — whenever any major power generation facility is planned to be built anywhere — the local residents in the local town would oppose the plant because of local impacts.  The purpose of the EFSA is to take the power out of the hands of the local officials, who may be subject to constituent pressure to oppose the plant.  That is the reason that all the opinions that the EFSB gets under the EFSA (from DEM, OER, Town of Burrillvile, etc.) are advisory opinions only.  The final decision to grant or deny a permit to build the plant rests solely with the EFSB.  This was the purpose of the law.”

However, “it is in the sole discretion of the Town Council whether or not to grant a beneficial tax treaty to Invenergy.  The Governor cannot force them to do that.  The EFSB cannot force them to do that.”

Pacheco and other Town Council members said over and over that they need to be neutral ahead of any reports that their boards are preparing for the EFSB, because it was the Town Council that nominated the members of these boards. This is of course nonsense. Governor Gina Raimondo, who nominated the members of the EFSB board, has been a major proponent of the plant. Where is her neutrality? Why is she not afraid that her support for the project will affect the people she’s nominated to board positions?

This pretension of neutrality merely shields the Town Council from their responsibility to their constituents, who overwhelmingly do not want this plant. Nikolyszyn might think this is all business as usual but he forgets: government is not business.

The Town Council would be completely in their power to pass a resolution declaring that they will not, under any circumstances, engage in a tax treaty with Invenergy. The company could then decide to go forward with the plant or not, but not only will their profitability suffer, so will their public image.

Reaching a deal with the Town will give Invenergy and Governor Raimondo political coverage. With a tax treaty in place it will be harder to say that the plant was forced on the Town against the will of the people since the company negotiated with the representatives of the people for an “equitable” deal.

Democracy will have worked, supposedly.

Not engaging with Invenergy sends a strong message that this plant is not wanted by the people of Burrillville. The plant can then only proceed against the will of the people, against the wishes of a democratically elected government. A Governor that blatantly disregards the will of the people in such a situation is a tyrant. A company that builds an unwanted facility against a community’s interests is not a community partner but a despoiler.

Now is not the time for wishy-washy politics, business as usual and secret (not secret) negotiations.

If the Burrillville Town Council can’t take a stand, it’s time for the citizens of Burrillville to find new Town Councillors.

CODEPINK, peace groups join campaign against Textron cluster bombs


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

img-petition-2Multiple peace groups are targeting Textron because the Rhode Island-based conglomerate provided cluster bombs to Saudi Arabia that were used in the conflict in Yemen, injuring civilians and contributing to a growing human rights catastrophe in the severely impoverished Middle Eastern nation.

CODEPINK, a female-organized anti-war group, the Cluster Munition Coalition, (ICBL-CMC) an international group that lobbies against cluster bombs, Pax Christi, a Catholic peace organization, the American Friends Service Committee, a Quaker group, and others plan to protest at Textron’s world headquarters in Providence, 40 Westminster St., on Monday at 4:30.

“The only beneficiaries of Endless War have been the huge military industrial complex,” according to a news release from the groups. Textron, according to the release, “produces many pieces of the war machine.”

After a Human Rights Watch report detailed the dangers posed by cluster bombs used by Saudi forces in Yemen, RI Future reported that local RI business Textron made and sold the cluster weapons in question. Textron is one of only four private businesses in the world that still makes cluster bombs, and the only one in North America  and recently sold cluster bombs to Turkey, Oman, United Arab Emerites, South Korea, India, Taiwan as well as Saudi Arabia.

Cluster bombs have been outlawed by 119 nations across the planet because of the indiscriminate harm they can cause to civilians during and after military conflicts. They are not banned by either the United States or Saudi Arabia.

“When these weapons are dropped, it is impossible to be sure they will not hit people’s homes or neighborhood. Each cluster munition contains many small submunitions- some of which do not explode when dropped,” said Megan Burk, director of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines – Cluster Munition Coalition, who will speak at Monday’s action. “These unexploded submunitions act as landmines.”

CODEPINK recently started a petition asking Textron to end production of cluster bombs.

“We, the undersigned, call on Textron Industries and CEO Scott C. Donnelly to immediately cease all sales of munitions to Saudi Arabia,” it says. “Textron’s munitions have been part of a campaign that has caused the death of 3,000 innocent Yemeni civilians. It’s time for this to stop. Please immediately cease all weapons sales to Saudi Arabia to ensure that your products are not used to commit further atrocities.”

After protesting at Textron, the group plans to deliver a copy of the petition to Rhode Island’s congressional delegation. Most of the delegation has spoken out against the use of cluster bombs.

“Cluster munitions pose an unacceptable danger to civilians,” said Congressman David Cicilline. “I’ve advocated for restricting the use of these weapons in the past, and I’ll continue working to limit the risk they pose to civilians.”

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a co-sponsor of the Cluster Munitions Civilian Protection Act, said, “Cluster bombs can take a terrible and lasting toll on civilians, which is why I’ve cosponsored legislation to restrict their use. I hope the Senate will take action on this bill to help protect innocent civilians from these dangerous weapons of war.”

Senator Jack Reed, the senior Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, “has supported efforts to limit the sale and transfer of cluster munitions and to ensure the use of more precise technologies to protect civilians,” according to spokesman Chip Unruh.

Read RI Future’s full coverage of Textron’s cluster bombs here:

Ray Rickman on Elorza, possibilities for Providence


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Ray Rickman, the head of Stages of Freedom and a former member of the General Assembly, offered tough criticism and some sage advice for Providence Mayor Jorge Elorza, who recently announced severe fiscal problems in the Capital City.

Rckman14_360_239_90“So he’s trying to signal to us bankruptcy might be required,” Rickman said. “I think it’s inappropriate.”

Rickman isn’t confident Elorza can handle the task. “He doesn’t have the fiscal understanding or experience to manage this problem nor does his administration,” he said. “It is so obvious that they don’t have the ability to tackle this.”

“First thing he should do is assemble a group of people,” Rickman said. “I don’t know if it’s 15 or 20, but he needs to get some financial advice… He has to take responsibility. I think he should get a group of people in place that understand municipal finance.”

Rickman said property taxes can fairly be raised on those with the largest lots in the city.

“The more land you have, the lower your taxes,” he said. “So if you’re on the East Side and you have three lots, they charge you less money, no matter how valuable your land is… There are twenty people, very, very rich people with very big pieces of land and they don’t pay the tax that they would pay if they had a piece of land 1/3 of the size.”

Rickman said bold new ideas are necessary.

“I think you have to examine the whole ball of wax before you start deciding what to do,” he said. “We have scores…[of] millionaires on the East Side of Providence… Could we get a fund for Providence?”

For more of Rickman’s insights, click to listen to the audio below.

kaGh5_patreon_name_and_message