How would you spend $17 million on downtown transit?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

RIPTAHave you heard about the $17 million “Downtown Enhanced Transit Corridor” grant that the city of Providence received for the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority to develop a 6-stop enhanced bus corridor to run from the Providence Railroad station to a new bus hub in the hospital district?  Its largely the route originally planned to be for a streetcar.

RIPTA is organizing a “stakeholder” group to advise on implementation, the first meeting of which is scheduled for October 24.  The RIPTA Riders Alliance, of which I am a member, was invited to participate.  An open public meeting for all may be scheduled later.

$17 million should be enough to be a potential game-changer for downtown and for RIPTA, both of which are struggling.  Indeed RIPTA ridership has dropped significantly in the last 2 years, from about 20 to 18 million riders. Not long ago the RIDOT Director publicly called RIPTA a “failure” because of our low commute by transit rate.  The decision by Citizens Bank to locate a huge corporate “campus” west of I-295 where there is no transit is an indication of how little RIPTA can matter to employers.  Downtown is hurting too, from the long empty “Superman” building to the well publicized perception of unpleasant conditions and “chaos” in Kennedy Plaza.

RIPTA planners have said they intend to use the $17 million grant to jazz up the bus stops with enhanced amenities, to buy some ultra-clean hybrid buses, and have six of their lines (#1,3,6,51,58,72) routed on the
corridor to ensure very frequent service.

While this includes some good ideas, at $2/ride, soon likely to be $2.50, I don’t see how this will attract many new riders who don’t already have a pass or ride free anyway.  I don’t see how this expensive fare will do much to attract attention of those wanting to do business that might lead to economic redevelopment. Thus I suggest that the buses RIPTA wants to buy be used to establish a free loop on that corridor.

About a year ago the Coalition for Transportation Choices hosted a meeting here with invited speakers from Denver, Minneapolis and Hartford where transit initiatives were successful in building ridership and spurring economic development.  One thing Denver and Hartford (New Haven too) did to help do this was to institute a free bus shuttle connecting their train stations, also on the periphery, to key central locations.  So this can be done!  I’ll also add that having lived in Oregon 1974-75 when Portland OR was considered a failed city with a dead downtown, one thing they did, (Seattle too) to turn things around was to institute a fare-free downtown zone to get people more used to using transit and to come downtown where they can get around easily.  This was a great success even if it could not be sustained through the 2008 recession.

Not just those that love cities, we all have a stake in having our central city and transit system succeed as they have so much potential to contribute to the problem of combating climate change.

Those who think this is an idea worth exploring  need to encourage RIPTA to reconsider.  Operating funds for the shuttle is a problem, but if there is a will to do so perhaps Federal “CMAQ ” funds  can be reprogrammed for this purpose, at least for a few years.  (CMAQ helped support operating the old Providence-Newport ferry and the South County commuter rail.)  After the bad publicity on Kennedy Plaza, both for the buses and the city, something needs to be done to get positive attention.  And a free shuttle will help strengthen the value of our Northeast Corridor location and commuter rail access TO Providence, from the north and south.

This project, together with enhanced policing and better services for the homeless and mentally ill in the Plaza, can begin to turn the situation around for the better.   For reasons of environment, economy, and quality of life, and for those who love cities, we don’t want to squander this opportunity created by this grant to make a real improvement on our economy, environment, and quality of life.

Citizens Bank trashes land, and land use planning


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

citizens johnstonLast week the big shots celebrated the groundbreaking for the new Citizens Bank headquarters on green space just west of I-295 in Johnston. Not me. I think the state is a triple loser, losing open space, tax revenue, and spending tax money. The 3,200 jobs that are supposed to be established there are not new but just a relocation of Citizens employees from built up areas in Providence, East Providence and Cranston.

Taxpayers are out because Johnston gave them a 20 year “tax treaty” (aka subsidy) and we will spend millions for a new interchange on I-295 at Greenville Avenue, and to extend sewer lines there. Providence Gas Company executives started Grow Smart RI because they were concerned with the high costs of providing infrastructure to such developments. Now that company is part of National Grid and they closed their building in downtown Providence, you cannot even pay a utility bill there any more. It seems corporate America is not interested in smart growth. Putting development where we have infrastructure is the core of land use planning, but everyone, including Statewide Planning, the Governor, RIDOT, and our congressional delegation seems ready to ignore this and roll over for Citizens. They don’t even seem to care that I-295 may become more dangerous with more traffic and more exit/entrance merges.

The site being developed, about 123 acres, is mostly forest and brush, and  Greenville Avenue, now a pleasant residential area, will inevitably suffer from traffic and ugly sprawl development from the new interchange. Citizens employees may well live even further out, perhaps within the Scituate watershed,  risking eroding our drinking water quality. Employees will do a lot  of driving, there is no serious chance for transit there. Gasoline consumption in the US just set a record high and Citizens Bank seems determined to make us use even more. Perhaps the “fossil free” folks opposing some specific fossil fuel supply projects, (e.g. the Burrillville power plant, Keystone pipeline) should pay more attention to actually reducing the demand for fossil fuels.

Not everyone in Johnston is so pleased with this. I note the Johnston Sunrise had an “open letter” from the Johnston Homeowners and Neighbors Association decrying what Raimondo and Mayor Joseph Polisena have done to facilitate this project which can turn their neighborhood into another ugly commercial strip choked with traffic and gobbling up more green space. But nobody helped or even paid attention, the town council and the planning and zoning boards did what Citizens Bank wanted, including amending the apparently worthless comprehensive plan.

I note that potential subsidies for reusing downtown Providence’s Superman Building have drawn criticism from both liberal and conservative groups but the Citizens project has not. As a city kid originally from New York, I think this reflects a Rhode Island suburban mind-set, cities are for the poor and minorities, we move out when we can, no reason to put the jobs there. The East Side, anchored by Brown and RISD, is the main exception.  Liberals and conservatives also mostly see the bus system as for the poor and minorities. Liberals are willing to subsidize it to keep it going, but for the most part will not use the buses themselves. Not even if service is pretty good – as it is in many places.

Finally, I’ll contrast this with what I just read about Denver, Colorado which has had unusual success in recovering from the 2008 recession. One key element noted in the article was regional cooperation in which various communities there support each other in generating development and building transit, rather than undermine each other as Johnston has done,  So our cities struggle, maybe face bankruptcy, sprawl spreads further, and our life style keeps us pumping out the greenhouse gases.

Clinton is not a ‘lesser evil’


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

800px-Hillary_Clinton_official_Secretary_of_State_portrait_cropA recent RIF post got us into a “lesser evil” discussion about Hillary Clinton.  While I disagree with her about a few issues, that doesn’t make her “evil.” Its bad enough the right-wing attack machine has smeared Clinton for so long, calling her “crooked” even though determined, relentless investigations going back to Whitewater, Vince Foster, Travelgate and more have never found anything crooked. For liberal/progressive sites to pile on is crazy.

I think there is no doubt Clinton will defend medicare/medicaid/social security, defend the medical insurance expansion of the ACA, stand up for reproductive freedom, the Iran nuclear deal, rights for immigrants, labor, the LGBT community, appoint reasonable Supreme Court justices, and maybe expand gun background checks, child care and family leave programs if Congress allows. Trump and the GOP will do the opposite on all of the above.

Of course Clinton is not perfect. I don’t trust her on trade, she may approve high levels of immigration that depress wages,  she has been too quick to intervene in foreign countries such as Libya and Honduras. But she and Obama did try to wind down the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, resisted pressure to do more military stuff in Syria and Iran, and are being criticized for that and for not doing even more killing in opposing ISIS.  So I can’t see how putting these GOP critics in charge who got us into Iraq in the first place will do us any good.

On taxes, Trump is a mainstream GOP trickle-downer, proposing the end of estate taxes, big corporate and personal income tax reductions. We’ve been down that road, it would further transfer wealth to the 1%, further starve government programs. Clinton wouldn’t do that.

On the environment, Clinton would likely continue the mixed record of Obama while Trump and the GOP would be all in for coal and oil and fossil fuels, they even say they are. Clinton would resist the GOP assault on pubic land and on wildlife. And Transport Providence of all people should appreciate the Democratic support for bikes, transit, and trains (by the way, VP choice Tim Kaine promoted downtown Richmond passenger rail revival when he was Mayor), the national GOP wants to eliminate all Federal support for that.

Clinton is not a pacifist, socialist, or radical, so those that are have legit reasons for not backing her, but it still doesn’t make her “evil.”  Not being in those categories, I see it as an easy choice to back Clinton, and not just because of Trump.  Still, in Rhode Island we are so used to civil and reasonable Republicans who often back needed good government programs and watchdog excessive spending, we can forget the extremism of Trump and the national GOP these days.

I also frankly value the idea of finally electing a woman as President.  Eight years ago plenty of progressives said that about a first black President, but its not cool to say that now about a real chance to elect the first woman.

As for the interminable e-mail stuff, nobody cared that previous GOP Secretaries of State used a private e-mail server at times, and rightfully so. While Clinton was ill-advised to do this, it doesn’t make her “evil” it is just a political attack point which Sanders himself thought was a distraction.

To sum up, though far from perfect, she is a reasonable and decent choice to support for President.

Some modest proposals to boost RI’s business climate


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

topstatesforbizDespite much wringing of hands and awarding of tax breaks to various upper income and business folks, we Rhode Islanders are told our business climate IS still at the bottom. Thus I propose these seven modest suggestions for addressing this problem.

1. Ban any pro-union advocacy opinions in the state’s media. While talk radio mostly does this already, some pro-union opinions occasionally do slip into the Providence Journal, RI Future, and maybe other local papers. I’m sure business will appreciate it if we close this loophole.

2. Cut pay of public workers by 50%. Though public workers have already made concessions on pay, health care and pensions, some of them can still afford to drive.  Halving their pay would not only lower the tax burden, but make more room on the roads for the important people.

3. Stop enforcing clean water laws.  Not only will this too lower the tax burden, but as public water supply gets more polluted, investors will see opportunities here to sell more bottled water and also to make money in the health care system treating the people who persist in drinking public water and thus get sick.

4. Stop funding bike, pedestrian and transit programs.  This will make the state more attractive to oil and auto companies.  Also, by discouraging physical activity, this will also increase obesity, making Rhode Islanders less fit and thus less able to challenge pro-business programs.  Those who persist in biking or walking can perhaps be made subject to a gasoline-avoidance fee that can generate revenue to subsidize business jets. But as there are proposals in the US House of Representatives to do something like this on a national level, we better do this quickly before we lose a competitive advantage over other states.

5. Sell all public beaches. Not only will this provide more shoreline for the rich to buy, but their view of the shore from their yachts will be improved if the hordes of riffraff on the public beaches are forced off.

6. End the sales tax on high-end cars. Though we already eliminated sales taxes on boats and private airplanes, the rich still have to pay sales taxes on BMWs, Cadillacs, Lexuses etc. It is not fair that their cars are not treated tax-wise the same way as their yachts and planes.

7.  Require all low income folks to be servants to the business class for 3 days a year. After all, we know how hard it is to find good servants these days. The low income folks serving the rich could polish their cars or silver, cut the grass, mop the floors and such. Giving up only 3 days would not be too much of a burden, but think how much it could improve our business climate rankings as no other state does this. Indeed we can market this initiative by emphasizing the “Plantations” part of our official state name that we voted to keep. not that long ago.

Will these suggestions be seriously considered?  Maybe.

How would you spend $5.6 billion on transportation in RI?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

transportation planningThe $5.6 billion is the total expected spending over 10 years in a draft Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) for highways and transit going to public hearings on Thursday, May 26 (2pm and 6:30pm in the DOA Building on Smith St.) The draft documents have about 500 pages so it is not easy to review, but is online at RI Statewide Planning.

Spending is much higher than usual because of revenue projected from the new truck tolls, the borrowing of $300 million in so-called “GARVEE” bonds (paid back from future Federal highway appropriations so no voter approval is deemed necessary) and some increased support from the new Federal transportation law.

Most concerning for me, the draft calls for allocating $195 million to the 6-10 project this year, 2016, even though its design – expressway or boulevard – is still being discussed and the city is investigating alternative visions for the corridor. The draft calls for $3 million of public money for a new I-295 interchange in Johnston to subsidize the Citizens Bank move to a new “campus” even though that is contrary to all our land use goals. $38 million is proposed to implement the truck tolls.  An additional $50 million or so is proposed to widen I-95 northbound through Providence when the northbound viaduct is replaced, adding to the huge gashes highways make in central Providence.  But some highway projects are deferred, such as a full Route 4/I-95 west interchange, new Route 403 ramps, and an overpass to avoid the one traffic light on Route 146.  Much money will go to repairing deficient bridges all over the state, with the intent to start as soon as possible before it gets even more expensive to do so, and a lot of state roads will be resurfaced, they are all listed.

On the transit side, it continues some slow progress toward re-establishing a commuter rail stop in Pawtucket, a little new funding for some RIPTA bus service to supplement our commuter rail, seed money to see if someone will operate seasonal ferry service, but no sign of any other rail service expansion. $17 million is allocated for an “enhanced” 6 stop bus corridor where the Providence streetcar would have gone, though it doesn’t even promise any signal priority on that route. The $35 million bus hub bonds that voters approved in 2014 is listed as 2016 revenue for a Providence Station Transit Center. The bond actually could fund bus hubs anywhere in RI, and now may be needed in Pawtucket which is apparently losing its existing Visitors Center bus hub, though there is now no project  being considered.  Otherwise it is largely business as usual for RIPTA with continued bus and paratransit van replacements.

Our bike path network will grow slowly, especially slowly in the first five years, largely limited to extending the Blackstone Bikeway in Woonsocket plus some progress on finishing the South County path. A “City Walk” proposal in Providence is recommended for funding.

My overall take is that beyond really going after improving the bridges there is no game-changer here, not even in light of climate change considerations. For example, there is no sign of any interest in electrifying our commuter rail in the 10 year period (contrast with huge subsidies available for electrifying the auto fleet) nor much sign of attempting to reduce vehicle-miles traveled, or promote more energy efficient urban core redevelopment.

I do hope some in the Rifuture community will investigate this issue which involves our transportation future and so much of our money. Consider testifying at the hearings.  I think Statewide Planning, RIDOT and RIPTA would be willing to help provide more information, but you can also contact me (bschiller@localnet.com) if you like, I do have a print copy of the documents.

OCG Candidate School can help YOU run for office


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

OCG_logoOperation Clean Government (OCG, at www.ocgri.org) has run non-partisan “candidate schools” since 2002 and they are doing again this year on Saturday, June 4 at Rhode Island College, hosted by the Political Science Department there.

It is my view that RI democracy suffers from a lack of contested races, yet I can state from my own experience of having run for office, that it s very doable.  There are no filing fees, the Board of Elections is always helpful with paperwork, you need relatively few signatures of registered voters to get on the ballot – for example only 50 to qualify for State Representative, and they can be from any party, even your opponent can sign! And for such offices one needs relatively little money if you have the time to get about the district.  And I can say it is actually interesting to do exactly that.

Yet not enough people run.

This year, as of this writing  the program includes:  Secretary of State Nellie Gorbea and Ethics Commission attorney Jason Grammit share what needs to be done about financial reporting and ethical issues: there are sessions on campaign organization, use and misuse of web-sites, social media, fundraising, messaging, signage, campaign materials, and the media.  Labor/Industrial Relations star Scott Molloy will be a lunch speaker.   Presenters and panelists include Scott Avedisian, Suzy Alba, James Sheehan, Patricia Morgan, Jim Hummel, Dave Layman, John Loughlin, Dan McGowan, Kate Nagle, Brett Smiley, Rick Wilson.

The event starts with a continental breakfast at 8:45 a.m. and runs to about 5 p.m.  The registration fee of $110 includes course materials, breakfast and lunch, refreshments at breaks, and plenty of chance to network.  Please check it out, or register, at www.ocgri.org or encourage others to do so as approrpriate.  Our communities and state will benefit from competitive elections.

www.ocgri.org
Get Involved! | | | Operation Clean Government (OCG) is a group dedicated to promoting honest, responsible, and responsive state government in Rhode Island.

 

Don’t give up on two-state Israel Palestine solution


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Those writing about the Israel-Palestine conflict often demonize one side or the other, not that hard to do as both have done, and are doing, bad things. But neither Israelis nor Palestinians can make the other side surrender, go away, or disappear, so conflict continues and the demonization doesn’t get either side anywhere. Indeed, this is one element of the destabilization of the Middle East which is putting the whole world at risk.

However, it is possible to be both pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian, not by spreading hate one way or another, but by working for a two state solution where Israelis and Palestinians each have their own state. This will require efforts at reconciliation, mutual understanding, and compromise on all sides.

Indeed there is a local RI effort to this end. On April 7, 8, 9 an Israeli settler and a Palestinian activist now working for peace will be talking about “Seeing the Humanity in Your Enemy” at Brown, a synagogue, and a mosque.

seeinghumanityThe outlines of a two-state solution have long been evident. The Israelis will have to give up the dream of incorporating most of the West Bank, stop the settlement expansion and withdraw from some of them, allow East Jerusalem to be the Palestinian capital, share resources more equitably, end their Gaza blockade, allow freer passage between Gaza, the West Bank, and the rest of the world. Palestinians will have to give up the dream of “right of return” for refugees and descendants to go to Israel, call off boycotts, stop the digging of attack tunnels, accumulating rockets and their occasional firing from Gaza, stop the incitement to kill Jews and the celebration of those who do, accept some temporary security arrangements Israel will insist on, and possibly, allow some Jews to live in their Palestine state. Both sides will have to genuinely accept the national aspirations of the other.

Failure to do these things means the conflict continues. Israelis will live under threat of terrorism, their internal democracy and world standing erodes, and desperate Palestinians will smuggle in even more powerful weapons. Palestinians will continue to suffer under occupation, their area of control will be eroded further, there will be occasional hurtful Israeli reprisals, and the Israeli extremists will grow and do more depredations. This serves neither those who think they are pro-Israel nor those that think they are pro-Palestinian, nor the US whose interests are best served by a resolution to this conflict.

So even though there are no current negotiations, we cannot afford to give up on a two state solution. There is some basis for hope. Despite the extremists, significant numbers of Israelis and Palestinians understand that a two-state solution is in their interest. While it won’t be easy, the United States with our vast power and influence, is uniquely positioned to help jump-start a process to bring this about.

President Obama, before he leaves office, could still help by formally outlining what a reasonable two-state solution would look like with regard to boundaries, trade rules, security arrangements, and religious accommodations. I believe he will find support for this initiative within in the American Jewish and Muslim communities. Any success would be a great legacy for him, a boost to US interests, and greatly benefit both Israelis and Palestinians. After all, with its climate, Mediterranean shoreline, wealth of history, and most of all, the talent of the people of the region, Israel-Palestine can have a wonderful future if only peace can be achieved.

What are fair fares at RIPTA?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

RIPTAIn March, the RI Public Transit Authority (RIPTA) raised their monthly pass price from $62 to $70, a transfer from $.50 to $1, eliminated the discounted 15-ride $26 pass, but kept the basic $2 one-state rate, whether you ride for just two stops or all the way from Westerly to Providence.

These fares, paid mostly by hard working low income working people, were already well above average.  Last summer a survey of 21 reasonably comparable bus systems found average basic fare of $1.60, average transfer only $.09 (many had free transfers) average monthly pass $49. Most had zones where there were higher fares for longer or express rides and many had no-fare or low-fare downtown shuttles. RIPTA abolished our low-fare “short-zone” over a decade ago.

High fares may be one reason our commute by transit rate here, noted by Governor Raimondo’s new transportation leadership,  is barely half of what would be expected by our density.  Thus RIPTA is far, far from living up to its potential to reduce congestion and pollution and to help fight climate change or to the rebuilding of our core cities and our economy.  And now, they took a step backward by charging more to their most frequent and loyal riders that pay the fares.

One reason fares may be relatively high is the need for reasonable farebox recovery in light of the free rides for seniors and people with disabilities with incomes under twice the Federal poverty level. This free riding has grown to about 5.6 million rides a year, about 30% of all rides. It also contributes to the perception that our bus service is just for the poor that may make it harder to attract paying commuters, especially as buses can be overcrowded during peak hours. With deficits looming, last spring the legislature repealed the law prohibiting RIPTA from charging fares to the seniors and disabled, instead allowing up to half fare for those groups. Naturally those riding free wanted to keep their benefits so protests were organized resulting, as of now, that RIPTA will charge those groups 50 cents a ride, just 1/4 of the regular fare starting July 1 but still below the senior average of $.68 found in the survey.  However, there are bills in the legislature that would restore the free rides, though they don’t add any funding to make up for the reduction in expected revenue.

Reflecting the decency of Rhode Islanders who want to help the poor, many groups support the continuation of the free fares. It certainly is a feel-good position and there are folks in dire poverty that really cannot afford additional expenditures. But there is another side to the story. Low income people on medicaid are eligible to still get free rides to any kind of medical trip including pharmacy visits. Twice the Federal poverty level is $31,860 for a couple, $48,500 for a household of four which may be more than some low income working people who pay full fare. Perhaps this threshold could be lowered to protect the very poor.

So what is a fair fare policy? My opinion is hold down fare increases for all passengers first by working to reduce RIPTA deficits through internal efficiencies and marketing promotions to attract more paying passengers. More state revenue should go for improving conditions for all passengers, such as keeping the Kennedy Plaza building open after 7pm when passengers now have to wait out in the cold and dark. Passenger revenue can be increased by higher fares on long distance express routes and charging the now-free riders half fare only during the peak hours, letting them ride free during the off-peak hours when more space is available. This can help raise revenue to keep the system going, make more space available to help attract more commuters while keeping a safety net for the poor.

Another $815 million for the Narragansett Bay Commission?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

NBCmapBesides the $120 million taxpayer ballpark subsidy and the $100 million streetcar to hardly anywhere, another elephant in the room is the Narragansett Bay Commission’s (NBC) $815 million Phase 3 stormwater project.

This is not paid for by the entire state, but largely by the 118,000 households in the NBC district – Providence, Pawtucket, Central Falls, North Providence, Johnston, Cumberland, Lincoln and the northern part of East Providence – almost $7,000 per household.

The NBC wants to proceed with this despite concerns about “affordability” – recognized by the EPA as legitimate, despite the potential of alternative “green infrastructure,” despite concerns about the fairness of who pays, and despite not having the time to assess the results of phase 2, just recently completed. Also, though there is some flexibility in meeting federal clean water standards, it seems the NBC goal is to go beyond the minimum, even as Phase 1 and 2 has already cost about $547 million and has approximately quadrupled sewer bills for residents, whether they rent or own.

The problem the NBC is addressing is the combination of our sewage with stormwater runoff overwhelms the treatment plant after a storm and untreated sewage get into Narragansett Bay. Phase 1 constructed the tunnels, pipes and pump stations to temporarily store the stormwater, phase 2 involved interceptors, drains and catch basin improvements. Phase 3 is apparently more tunnels.

Roughly 80 percent of the flow after storms is due to runoff from roads, parking lots and other impervious surfaces, but the cost is almost all born by those contributing the 20 percent of sewage. This is another subsidy to drivers from all over who use the roads and parking lots at stores, offices, state government, hospitals, colleges etc. A big beneficiary of the spending are shoreline property owners who pay nothing, shellfishermen and other Bay users. There is a possible social justice issue here.

There are few checks and balances. There was a “stakeholder” review process that few know about. The PUC rubber stamps what the NBC wants, even allowing monthly billing which tripled postage and processing costs compared to the previous quarterly billing, perhaps hiding the scope of the increases. Local politicians don’t much care, they are not blamed as the sewer bills are not collected through their tax system. The state’s environmental community understandably just wants the Bay cleaned up and is little concerned with who pays, even if the metro area becomes increasingly unaffordable. And though Transport Providence and others have tried to call attention to the role of parking lots and the auto culture that underlies a lot of this problem, and others on the problem of runoff from fertilized lawns, the issue, unlike the ballpark or trolley, is too complex to get easy attention.

While no expert on this, I do recommend attention to this issue and I wonder what the progressive community thinks about this project. Visit www.narrabay.com for the NBC viewpoint and plenty of information.

What should be done about RIPTA’s deficit?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

RIPTAAt the May 5 Senate Finance RIPTA budget hearing, RIPTA CEO Ray Studley projected a $1.4 million deficit this fiscal year, and about a $5.6 million deficit next year (which starts July 1), and said he is “running out of options” to reduce deficits without cutting service.

This deficit is mostly due to paratransit, or transit for people with disabilities. Changes to this program may cost RIPTA about $5.9 million next year due to elimination of the “Rhody 10” revenue and the shift of many clients from some DHS programs to unreimbursed but expensive ADA rides. There was also a loss of revenue due to changes at Johnson&Wales that reduced sales.

His “ask” to address this, as far as I can tell, was to refer to bill H6108 which seems to authorize RIPTA to charge a $1 fare to the 1/3 of all passengers who ride free, mainly low income seniors and the disabled.

It would also have the state make up any further subsidy needed as result of this reduced fare. Studley noted this is still more generous than federal requirements which allow full fare during peak hours. He indicated that with 5.6 million free rides/year, such a $1 fare with expected elasticity might produce about $3 million in additional revenue. He noted one reason for the high number of free rides is a generous qualification level at incomes up to 200% of poverty, Mr. Studley suggested consideration of lowering it to 150%.

It seems Pennsylvania and Illinois are the only other states having a comparable free ride level but those states explicitly make up the lost revenue with a state appropriation.

Studley also hinted at another gas tax hike dedicated to RIPTA, (there was a map of state gas tax rates in the power point) noted that is what happened last time RIPTA took a hit from changes in Medicaid transport policy. However, the gas tax is already going up 1 cent in July (RIPTA should get 5% of the additional revenue, about $210,000) and with MA gas tax 6.5 cents less than RI it will be a challenge to get the Assembly to boost it further.

The senators asked about fuel costs, the paratransit system, overtime expenses, but made no suggestions to close the deficit.

Charging low income seniors and disabled a fare is a sensitive subject but it is worthy of serious consideration as there seem no easy alternatives. Most passengers, RIPTA employees, and transit advocates who see the potential of transit to help our core cities, the economy and the environment, think the worst thing would be to reduce service, especially as lines with weak ridership have already been weeded out by the recent route study assessment. While a little revenue can be gained by higher fares on long distance park and ride expresses, a fare increase above $2 in the metro area may provide little additional revenue and would hurt the mostly low income working people who pay the fares.

I don’t expect much more help from the Governor. Channel 10 reported she stated her high priority was to end the car excise tax. That would be a boon to those households with many cars, or expensive cars, but at the expense of those without.

Perhaps RIPTA could do more to rebuild paying ridership which took a hit with the long KP construction and the snowstorms. It was also noted at the fare study hearing how little revenue was being generated by the employer-supported “ecopass.” Note that there is very limited support for Upass support from public colleges. For example, while Brown faculty and staff (as well as students) can ride “free” with Brown IDs, no such benefit is available to faculty and staff from CCRI, RIC or URI, not even at URI-Providence in the midst of congestion but with good transit access and where the “free” parking provided in the Convention Center garage is very expensive.

I welcome suggestions on how to proceed as does the RIPTA Riders Alliance.

Should Providence build a streetcar line?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
pvd streetcar
Artist’s rendering of a PVD streetcar. Click on the image for plans from the city.

A streetcar, or a “trolley” running on tracks in the street, might be in the works for Providence. Last year the city received a $13 million “TIGER” grant from the US DOT for preliminary work on a streetcar line. It was recently reported that the city was indeed seeking proposals for its planning and engineering. But in December 2014 its proposed route, originally to go from near RI Hospital to the East Side, was changed so that the streetcar would not go through the tunnel to the East Side but instead terminate at the train station. This reduces the length from 2.1 to 1.6 miles and the projected cost from about $117 to $100 million. About 2,900 daily riders was projected.

To fund the full construction, the city may consider issuing about $50 million in bonds, to be paid back by a “TIF” that is, tax increment financing whereby taxes on the enhanced property values in the area that the streetcar is expected to generate will be used to repay the bonds. The project would still need another $30 million or so to be fully funded. If the enhanced property taxes do inadequately materialize, the city would still have to pay back the bonds.

Apparently Mayor Jorge Elorza and Council President Luis Aponte think this is a good bet. Reportedly, Mr. Aponte believed further federal funding is likely as Providence is the only New England city seeking to build a streetcar. I’ll note the next round of TIGER grant applications to are due in June but I’m not aware of any public input into what the city or state apply for.

Reactions to the streetcar are mixed. City leaders and other supporters believe it will spur economic growth and jobs by attracting developers, entrepreneurs and millennials and there is some evidence that this can happen as developers like the assurance that tracks in the streets provide. There will be construction jobs as this is built. Further, there are environmental benefits to electrified transportation, especially as sustainable generation increases. And this can be the basis for a larger system of electric streetcars to serve many more communities.

However, costs are high. There are both relatively few residents along the route, and relatively few commuters coming to Providence by train, though both are expected to increase. Many considering a streetcar trip can walk instead, especially with $2 fare even for short trips. Besides the still unfunded capital costs, estimated operating deficits remain about $3.2 million/year, adding significantly to RIPTA’s deficit projections.

Thus, there is concern that a streetcar could come at the expense of some bus service. The streetcar route has much overlap with bus routes that serve the train station and the jewelry district. While no buses actually now go directly from the rail station to the hospitals, this will change when the new bus hub by the train station that voters already approved is implemented. RIPTA could also simply try a shuttle bus between the rail station and hospitals to check on the demand.

So it could be an economic boon or a costly failure.  The Providence City Council Finance Committee is holding a hearing on authorizing a TIF district for this project 6pm on Thursday, May 14.   It may be the only opportunity to weigh in with your suggestions.

Barry Schiller, former RIPTA Board member and long-time transit advocate, can be reached at bschiller@localnet.com

Why the left should embrace a ConCon


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
ri constitutionSome progressive groups and labor unions are actively opposing holding a constitutional convention. Indeed, I just got a letter for the head of the RI Federation of Teachers to that effect. It seems there was no rank and file input into that decision. Similarly as a member I had no input into the ACLU decision to oppose.
This is a disappointment, as Rhode Island is not doing that well, especially for working people, and much of the public is cynical about government, disengaged from civic activity and the political process. This is not in our interest as ultimately we need a more positive attitude to get the public support needed for government programs.
A constitutional convention can address this by reforms getting at the who-you-know insider system, Assembly procedures allowing midnight sessions with rules suspended, judicial selection abuse, 38 Studios type end runs around voters, fair redistricting, campaign finance, ethical requirements on legislators. It can build democracy, especially if voter initiative is approved, as it almost was the last time. The RI Sierra Club chapter had supported VI because of our experience elsewhere where it was used to pass environmental legislation, including CA coastal protection that real estate interests had blocked in their Assembly, and “bottle bills” blocked here by the throwaway industries. Indeed much of the energy these day on voter initiative is in the progressive direction, raising minimum wages, paid sick days, labeling GMO food, repealing anti-labor laws, expanding a bottle bill, but many of our progressives seem not to have caught up with that.
Civil rights is a legit concern, but I see little threat voters will restrict the rights of minorities in RI. MA is similar to RI but though they have voter initiative, this has not been a problem. Indeed a constitutional convention or VI could EXPAND rights such as the right to privacy, rights of the terminally ill, rights of children to an adequate education (recently ruled not now a constitutional right,) the right to vote, maybe even improved rights to shoreline access.
As for reproductive freedom, it is a big factor in my support for a con-con in hopes of getting Voter Initiative which of course the Assembly would never voluntarily give up any power and allow. Think ahead. If the GOP wins the next election, a shift of 1 US Supreme Court justice could overturn Roe v Wade, not an unlikely prospect. What are our prospects in the Assembly then, especially with Mattiello and Paiva-Weed in charge? Very low. Pro-choice people would be much better off with the voters, but without VI we’d have no recourse.
I think it would damage the union movement and the progressive community if they are seen as being afraid of the people voting, especially as Rhode Island voters consistently support infrastructure, transit, and public higher education investments, facilities for veterans and the disabled, and environmental protection, even voting pro-choice when that was once on the ballot. We have a small progressive group, Just Reform RI, that is advocating for the constitutional convention, we are developing a website www.justreformri.org and a “civil rights pledge” asking candidates for any convention to sign pledging not to reduce the civil rights of anyone. Please consider meeting with us as appropriate. Lets give democracy a chance!
Barry Schiller