Providence Renaissance Hotel employees file to hold union elections


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

PODEROSOS! 02A strong majority of workers at the Providence Renaissance filed for a union election yesterday. The workers expect to win the election and proceed to negotiate a fair contract with the hotel owner The Procaccianti Group. The workers believe unionization will increase racial and gender equity in Providence.

“We are Providence, we want to be heard,” said Raquel Cruz, a housekeeper at the Providence Renaissance. “If this hotel company respects Providence, they will respect us.”

Said Hipolito Rivera, a houseman at the hotel, “We’ve been demanding for years that The Procaccianti Group give us a fair process to decide upon unionization. We call on the hotel to do the right thing. Treat us like equals, not adversaries. Respect us, respect the results of our election and negotiate a fair contract.”

PODEROSOS! 01

The typical housekeeper in Providence is a Hispanic woman making under $25,000 a year, according to the most recent census information. This workforce earns significantly less than the median income for both white male and female full-time workers (at $52,543 and $44,007 respectively). The most recent union hotel contract to be negotiated by Unite Here Local 217 and Omni Providence specifies that the lowest wage for housekeepers is $15.96 per hour, which would come out to over $33,000 annually.

“I make the hotel lots of money every day.  I should not have to work three jobs just to get by,” said Cruz, “I just want to be able to help my child with their homework.”

Data shows that union hotels in Providence break the cycle of racial inequity with higher wages and better benefits. Given the demographics of the hotel workforce in Providence, any increase in wages or benefits would disproportionately benefit women and people of color.

Workers at the Renaissance are predominantly Dominican. A poster developed by the workers indicating union support showcases the Dominican flag as a background to the photos of dozens of supportive Renaissance workers.

(This post is based on a Unite Here! Local 217 press release.)

PODEROSOS! 03

PODEROSOS! 04

Patreon

Groups call on Gov. Raimondo to open public records


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

acluCiting a recent “pattern of disturbingly inadequate” responses to open records requests “on truly critical matters of public import,” five open government organizations have called on Governor Gina Raimondo to issue an executive order that calls on state agencies to “adopt a strong presumption in favor of disclosure in addressing requests for public information.”

In a letter sent Tuesday to Gov. Raimondo, the five organizations — ACCESS/RI, American Civil Liberties Union of Rhode Island, Rhode Island Press Association, New England First Amendment Coalition, and League of Women Voters of Rhode Island — cite three recent incidents in which state agencies addressed Access to Public Records (APRA) requests. The groups called the handling of each of these requests “questionable” and indicative of a “disinterest in promoting the public’s right to know.”

In the first incident, according to the Providence Journal, the state Department of Transportation provided an incomplete response to a reporter’s request for records related to the administration’s hotly debated truck toll proposal, failed to properly request an extension of time to respond, and then denied records without specifying what was withheld or whether there was any information in the withheld documents that could be released, as required by law.

In another instance, the administration denied the release of any records related to the hiring of former state Representative Donald Lally, citing “attorney-client privilege” and an APRA exemption for “working papers.” While the groups said it was reasonable that some documents might not be disclosable, they called the blanket denial of all records “untenable on its face.”

The third incident involves the Executive Office of Health and Human Services’ refusal to release an application filed with the federal government for additional funding for the state’s Unified Health Infrastructure Project. The department claimed the application and related documents were “still in development” despite the fact that the application had already been submitted for approval.

“From our perspective, none of [these responses] occupies a ‘shade of gray’ in interpreting APRA. Rather, precisely because they are so clear-cut, they warrant decisive action on your part in order to address the lackadaisical interest in a strong APRA that the responses embody,” the groups argued in the letter.

Representatives from the organizations said today that by issuing an executive order emphasizing the Administration’s commitment to open government, Gov. Raimondo would better ensure transparency and accountability from state executive agencies.

Linda Lotridge Levin, president of ACCESS/RI, said: “It is incumbent on public officials to make access to public records a priority if they expect to maintain the public’s trust.  The instances cited in the letter to the governor show that some public officials choose to remain oblivious to the state’s Access to Public Records Act that mandates that the workings of government remain transparent, accessible and accountable to its citizens. We in ACCESS/RI urge Governor Raimondo to ensure that members of her administration adhere to the law and to respond in a timely manner to all public records requests.”

Steven Brown, ACLU of RI executive director, said: “Governor Raimondo’s first executive order upon taking office addressed compliance with state ethics laws. In passing, it also urged state officers and employees to ‘be mindful of their responsibilities’ under the open records law. Because they have not been mindful, we believe an executive order specifically establishing a presumption of openness in responding to APRA requests will better promote that key responsibility.”

Justin Silverman, executive director of the New England First Amendment Coalition added: “This is an opportunity for Gov. Raimondo to remind those working under her leadership that government transparency is a top priority and that the public’s right to know must be protected. These recent APRA responses are concerning and the governor should make clear that the statute needs to be taken more seriously. Timely responses need to be made and records should be disclosed whenever possible. An executive order to this effect would help build trust between the people of Rhode Island and their elected leaders.”

Jane W. Koster, president of the League of Women Voters of RI, stated: “It is of the utmost importance that the citizens of Rhode Island’s ‘right to know’ be protected and broad citizen participation in government be encouraged. The League of Women Voters of the United States and LWVRI believe that democratic government depends upon informed and active participation at all levels of government. It further believes that governmental bodies protect this ‘right to know’ by giving adequate notice of proposed actions, holding open meetings and making public records accessible. The LWVRI believes that Governor Raimondo will act accordingly and alert all in her administration to comply with APRA going forward.”

A copy of the letter is attached and can be found here.

[This report comes from a press release.]

Blockaders of Spectra Energy construction site sentenced


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
DSC01819
Peter Nightingale and Curt Nordgaard

Associate Judge William C. Clifton of Rhode Island’s District Court handed down his verdict against Curt Nordgaard, and Peter Nightingale, who were arrested after locking themselves to the front gate at the site of Spectra Energy‘s compressor station in Burrillville, Rhode Island in a direct action organized by Fighting Against Natural Gas (FANG).

Charges of disorderly conduct were dismissed; charges of willful trespass resulted in a one-year “filing,” which means that these cases will be dismissed if the defendants come into no further conflict with the law.

DSC_7653Nordgaard,  a resident pediatrician at Boston Medical Center, stated after his arrest that “if we had legal means to stop this project, we would use them. Instead we are forced to protect families and communities through nonviolent civil disobedience, in proportion to the severity of this threat.” Nightingale,  a professor of physics at University of Rhode Island and a member of Fossil Free Rhode Island and who was arrested last December during a sit-in in U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse‘s office in Providence, has kept the promise he made at the time: “This pipeline is immoral and unjust, and we will keep taking action until this dangerous project is stopped.”

Peter NightingaleNightingale stated: “Under the Public Trust Doctrine, government has a duty to preserve Earth’s gifts for present and future generations. The fact that we cannot use this argument to justify our actions in Burrillville [in Rhode Island’s courts] is but one symptom of the environmental injustice that pervades our system of government.”

“Natural” gas has been touted as a bridge fuel by both the industry and the Obama Administration, but evidence has been mounting since 2011 that, independent of the use to which it is put, it is more dangerous for the climate than coal or oil.  This development, along with a growing awareness of local impacts such as air and water pollution, threats to public health, earthquakes, etc. are continuing to draw unexpected activists into increasingly defiant acts of civil disobedience against fracking and gas-related infrastructure.

[This report compiled from a FANG press release]

ACLU wants broader investigation in Cranston Police Dept.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

RI ACLU Union LogoCalling the findings of the Rhode Island State Police (RISP) investigation into the Cranston Police Department likely the “tip of an iceberg,” the ACLU of Rhode Island urged the Cranston City Council to call for further investigations into police practices and possible abuses of power against individuals outside the department.

In a letter sent to city councilors Tuesday, ACLU of Rhode Island executive director Steven Brown noted that while the RISP report was thorough, it focused on a handful of discrete, and largely internal, matters. Further investigation is warranted, the letter argued, because “the public deserves to know whether the improper actions so thoroughly documented in this report were, somewhat incredibly, the only such abuses to take place, or whether there were other unknown victims of these violations of the public trust.”

Steve Brown
Steve Brown

According to the RISP report, former police chief Marco Palombo not only hired private investigators to conduct surveillance of two police officers, but also briefly spied on a contract civilian computer technician. That spying also entailed police improperly accessing a DMV database to obtain information about the technician. The ACLU letter notes that “if police misused their access to state databases for one political purpose, the reasonable question naturally arises whether this was the only time such databases were misused.” As for surveillance of civilians in addition to the technician, another city employee alleged she too had been the subject of police surveillance. Though the RISP report was unable to substantiate her suspicions, Brown noted that under the circumstances, her concerns “cannot be dismissed out of hand either.”

The ACLU’s letter also pointed to RISP findings that police officials “improperly sought” search warrants for phone records of two targeted employees, and that the affidavits “appeared to be misleading to the Court.” At about the same time, Brown noted, a Rhode Island judge, ruling in a completely unrelated criminal case, sharply criticized Cranston police for, among other things, submitting warrant affidavits that contained “false statements that were deliberate or made in reckless disregard for the truth.”  Many of the “dubious practices” cited by the Court, states the letter, “seem eerily similar to some contained in the State Police report.”

These examples lend credence to the possibility that the documented “questionable activities used against fellow officers may have seeped into police activities against non-officers.” As a result, the ACLU letter called it “essential that further investigations be conducted to see if any of these troubling, and potentially unlawful, practices were utilized against others in instances unrelated to Ticketgate and the internal power struggles examined by the report.

The ACLU noted, as the State Police did, that the vast majority of police officers in the Cranston Police Department should not be judged by the bad actions of a few. At the same time, the RISP findings “may represent part of a broader pattern of police misconduct that cannot and should not be ignored lest it unintentionally promote a culture of indifference to basic civil rights that may continue to sprout in other contexts.”

As a result, Brown urged the City Council to “demand answers as to whether the police department, with or without the knowledge of the Mayor, may have engaged in other questionable activities against city residents since 2009, whether it was through improper surveillance, misuse of state databases, or other questionable undertakings such as those that have now been documented.”

This piece is based on a RI ACLU press release.

RI ACLU files complaint against DMV


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

acluThe ACLU of RI has filed a federal civil rights complaint against the Rhode Island Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV) on behalf of a recent Italian immigrant whom the DMV has barred from taking the written driver’s license exam in any language other than English, Spanish or Portuguese. The complaint, filed with the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), charges the DMV with violating a law that requires agencies receiving federal funding to provide meaningful access to programs and services for individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP).

Danilo Saccoccio, an Italian national who received his green card in November, is married to an American citizen and has two children who are also American citizens. When he sought to turn in his Italian driver’s license for a Rhode Island one, he was advised he was entitled to no language accommodations to take the test even though it is offered in two languages other than English. Although he has attended ESL classes for a short period of time since he has been here, and plans to attend more such classes when work and family duties allow it, Mr. Saccoccio speaks very limited English. Mr. Saccoccio avoids driving as much as possible, including to ESL classes, because he fears being stopped with only his Italian license.

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires agencies receiving federal funding to provide individuals with limited English proficiency meaningful access to agency programs and services. Federal regulations implementing Title VI specifically cite driver’s license exams as a critical service subject to the law. However, the DMV has claimed it has no obligation to accommodate the LEP population beyond what it has already done for the Spanish and Portuguese population, and has refused to offer any sort of accommodation through oral interpretation or translation services for Italian-speaking LEP persons.

In the 15-page complaint filed with the DOJ, ACLU volunteer attorney Jennifer Doucleff notes that, according to Census data, the current Italian-speaking LEP population ranks as the fourth most populous in the state, amounting to 2,470 persons, and that there are more than 20,000 other LEP persons who would not be able to obtain a driver’s license under the DMV’s policy.  The ACLU complaint concludes:

“[The DMV’s] insistence that the DOJ Guidance does not apply to the situation of an LEP resident seeking to attain meaningful access to this vital service or to other aspects of the drivers’ license program, raises serious doubts as to compliance with its Title VI obligations with regard to its other programs and services, as well as its obligations to members of other language LEP populations in Rhode Island.”

The complaint calls on DOJ to step in and order the DMV comply with federal law and provide Mr. Saccoccio and others like him meaningful access to the agency’s services. Over the years, the ACLU has filed similar language access complaints against the Department of Human Services and the state Judiciary, leading to improved LEP access at those agencies.

Steven Brown
Steven Brown

ACLU of RI volunteer attorney Doucleff said today: “The DMV’s blatant disregard for the federal guidelines established precisely to prevent it from discriminating against LEP individual raises red flags as to whether the agency can possibly be providing Rhode Island’s growing LEP population with meaningful access to any of its programs and activities.  Moreover, the DMV’s refusal to provide any level of accommodation to Mr. Saccoccio so that he may access the driver’s licensing process is particularly alarming given that there are currently more than 20,000 LEP Rhode Islanders who, like Mr. Saccoccio, do not speak a language in which the driver’s license exam is offered.”

ACLU of RI executive director Steven Brown added: “DMV’s refusal to comply with this critical anti-discrimination law is inexcusable. By already accommodating Spanish and Portuguese speakers in the exam process, the agency has recognized that LEP individuals have the right to a driver’s license. It cannot shut the door on other residents just because they do not speak Spanish or Portuguese. We are hopeful that the Department of Justice will halt this inequity.”

The complaint is available online at http://riaclu.org/images/uploads/Saccoccio_DOJ_Complaint.pdf

This post is based on an ACLU press release.

Former Employer of Treasurer’s Chief of Staff Wins


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

This will probably get lost since it was passed the day before Thanksgiving.  But it does not look right when Fidelity Investments who  used to employ Joseph Pratt, Treasurer Raimondo’s Chief of Staff, is selected as the vendor for the Ocean State Investment Pool.  The State Investment Commission, chaired by Treasurer Raimondo, named Fidelity the vendor today.  Here is the PBN coverage:

PROVIDENCE – Fidelity Investments was selected Wednesday as the vendor of the Ocean State Investment Pool, an initiative passed in the General Assembly in June to help state and municipalities improve their liquid asset investments…

“In these challenging times, the Ocean State Investment Pool will help local government leaders across the state invest their cash and other liquid assets,” said General Treasurer Gina M. Raimondo, who chairs the State Investment Commission.

“This program will allow Treasury to extend its expertise to municipalities and improve investment returns by creating economies of scale,” she said.

The OSIP is slated to launch in the first quarter of 2012…

Conflict of Interest?  Maybe, Maybe not…  Let’s hope the awarding of the 401K vendor contracts under the new pension reform law remain conflict of interest free.

For the very first time since 2009, Social Security benefits to increase

Social Security benefits will go up by 3.6 percent in 2012 to adjust for the living costs. Social Security benefits have not increased since 2009. The increase is welcome news for retirees in this difficult economic climate. Many retirees, however, will see much of that boost devoured by increased Medicare premiums. Source of article: Social Security benefits to increase for the first time since 2009 Continue reading “For the very first time since 2009, Social Security benefits to increase”

AT&T/T-Mobile Merger is about jobs. What’s wrong with that?

Last week, the pretend defenders of private sector unions on Fountain Street bought the line that the AT&T/T-Mobile merger was a bad idea. Typical double speak.  Here is a good counter argument from the Communication Workers of America:

If you repeat a made-up falsehood over and over again, will reasonable people start to believe it?

That’s what the critics of the AT&T/T-Mobile merger are hoping. They’ve manufactured a fact, claiming that the AT&T/T-Mobile merger will lead to 20,000 layoffs of T-Mobile workers. The problem is: they are just plain wrong. The proposed AT&T/T-Mobile merger is good for workers and good for job creation.

Certainly, with unemployment hovering at a stubborn 9 percent, the impact of the proposed merger on jobs today and in the future should be a top concern of policymakers.

Let’s look at the so-called evidence the critics put forward.

Continue reading “AT&T/T-Mobile Merger is about jobs. What’s wrong with that?”

Occupy Providence begins @ 5pm on Oct 15: Burnside Park

Date:  Saturday, October 15th
Event: Gathering/Rally & March Against Corporate Greed/Assembly/Occupation
Time:  5pm to (indefinitely)

On Saturday, October 15th, at 5pm, Rhode Islanders will gather together in Burnside Park (Downtown Providence) to express a feeling of mass injustice and stand in solidarity with those occupying Wall Street in Liberty Square.  This will be done as part of an international day of action in conjunction with the occupation of dozens of other cities around the country and the world.  I am writing because I want all Rhode Islanders who feel wronged by the corporate forces of the world to know that I believe that the members of the Occupy Providence General Assembly (OPGA) are your allies.  Members of the OP General Assembly have been meeting in Burnside Park everyday since Oct 1st, and it is a movement committed to non-violence, to maintaining a safe, alchohol free, drug free, harassment/discrimination free space, and it does not endorse any political candidate or party in any way.

Continue reading “Occupy Providence begins @ 5pm on Oct 15: Burnside Park”

Occupy: The Action is the Demand

THIS IS AN INDEPENDENT ESSAY! SEE DISCLAIMER BELOW!

On Sunday across the US in various publications opinion-setting writers lamented (1) /attacked (2) the lack of a coherent set of demands from the Occupy Wall Street protesters. It seems like a reasonable thing, you know – protesters having their demands.

Only, nothing couldn’t be further from the point. Making demands would be silly, as if they could possibly be met. The action is the demand: Continue reading “Occupy: The Action is the Demand”

State Representative Dan Gordon arrested by RI State Police

The esteemed (sic) Representative from the East Bay was arrested over the weekend on multiple charges.  Included in these were driving with a suspended license and evading police.  He had a warrant out for his arrest.  We also learned that he has a violent crime history – shocking, right? WPRI and PROJO both had the scoop and more details on their sites.

P.S. Dan sent me a photo from jail letting us know he is alright.  He mentioned something about after all the fun he had this weekend in jail that he changed his mind on that club in Tiverton and wanted to start one of his own, but I didnt catch all of it…

 

Why you can’t simply can’t trust Education Reformers with the facts

Because they leave most of the real facts out:

from today’s POLITIFACT:

But the mayors’ statement leaves out an important fact: The DRA is a test that very few students take because it is given only in schools that don’t go above second grade. In all other elementary schools, the state uses the New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP), a series of reading, writing, math and science tests used by Rhode Island, New Hampshire, Vermomt and Maine. Those tests start in grade 3.

And as I wrote earlier this year, how did BVP do on the NECAP?

The NECAP scores are out and the policy wonks will be going over them I am sure.  Here is a little tidbit in the data.  The wunderkind of the charter school movement, Blackstone Valley Prep, AKA, the Mayoral Academy, with all of their hype, score well below the state average on the test in both reading and math.

The State average in reading is 71%: Mayoral Academy score? 61

The State average in math is 55%: Mayoral Academy score? 48

Labor Day Address

labor day address

1934 was a tumultuous year for the Labor Movement in the United States, as the country continued to struggle its way out of the Great Depression. The Labor battles that raged in 1934 were preceded a year earlier with a sense of hope and promise for workers struggling for the necessities of survival against brutal oppressive employers. Following the Depression in the first year of Franklin Roosevelt’s presidency, a series of economic programs were implemented to aid in the recovery of our country. In June of 1933, Congress passed the “National Industrial Recovery Act”, which was the first actual Bill to guarantee and protect Collective Bargaining rights for workers in the United States.

Immediately, large scale organizing campaigns began in earnest up and down the industrialized east coast and other industrialized centers in the country. Yet, enforcement of the Act by those very individuals charged with its administration was woefully inept and met with stiff resistance from business leaders. Frustrated Union organizers fought with little success for the Collective Bargaining promised by the NIRA.

Once again, the stark reality became clear to the workers and the unions.

Once again, the government’s empty promises were not kept.

Once again, workers would be forced to win Democracy in their work placed – the hard way.

 

THE BATTLES LINES WERE DRAWN

In 1933 and 1934 workers organized across the length and breathe our Country.  Fed up with speed-ups, oppressive, unsafe working conditions, child labor and company control of too many aspect of their lives.  In those truly epic years workers in the United States fought for dignity and respect in their workplace by using the only weapon they had in their arsenal.  In 1934 workers hit the bricks and held fifteen major strikes.  Most notably were four strikes which labor historians agree were the most important strikes in the United States history.

  • The “Toledo Auto Lite Strike” in 1934, which pitted 6,000 automotive workers in a five day running battle with 1300 armed members of the Ohio National Guard.  Known as the “Battle of Toledo” the clash left two strikers dead and over 200 wounded, the victory led to wide spread unionization in Toledo and was the beginning of the United Auto Workers rise to prominence in organizing the automobile manufacturing industry.
  • The Minneapolis Teamsters Strike in 1934 which changed the city of Minneapolis.  The strike paved the way for mass organization of the over-the-road drivers throughout the Midwest and opened the doors of union membership to thousands of Minneapolis workers in other industries.
  • The 1934 West Coast Longshoreman’s Strike lasted 83 days; triggered by sailors and culminating in a four-day general strike in San Francisco which crippled the local economy and broke the back of the open-shop company unions and led to the unionization of all of the West coast ports of the United States.
  • The fourth and largest strike was the 1934 General Textile Strike which was the largest strike in United States History; involving over 400,000 textile workers from Alabama to Maine.  The strike began over fair wages and working condition in an industry awash with unfairness, abuse, child labor, dangerous working conditions, and minimal pay.

In September of 1934 in Rhode Island, the Great Textile Strike engulfed the primary industry in the Ocean State and required the calling out of the National Guard for riot duty.  By the second week of the strike, tensions between workers and owners erupted into open conflict centered in Saylesville, now Central Falls, where we stand today and in Woonsocket.  On September 10th, the continued misuse of force by deputy sheriffs, closely allied with the owners of the huge Sayles Textile Complex, provoked large scale rioting in and around the Sayles Bleachery and streaming out along Lonsdale Avenue and into this very cemetery where workers fled from guards and sheriffs armed with rifles and machine guns.  The workers used the headstones to block themselves from the incessant volley of bullets trained on them.

Gravestones tell the story of those who rest below them. And in this cemetery some of the gravestones tell another story.  Some of them carry the scars of machine gun bullets, as did so many of the workers who were wounded in that massacre and two who would not leave the cemetery alive.

The ultimate sacrifices born by workers in the strikes of 1934 and perpetuated upon them by guardsman, vigilantes and company thugs are unparalled in labor history even to this day.

Those workers earned and deserve our respect and recognition for paying the ultimate price of martyrdom so that others might be free from worker exploitation.

In 1934, thirty-three workers became martyrs in the Labor Movement:

In Florida – Frank Norman, an organizer kidnapped & murdered.

In George – textile workers Leon Carroll, Reuben Saunders and

V. Blalock were shot and killed.

In Texas – Charles Shapiro murdered on a picket line.

In Alabama – coal miners Edward Woolens, H.C. Collins and Ed Higgins were killed.

In Louisiana – longshoreman Murphy Humphrey murdered by sheriff’s deputy.

In Kentucky – miner Pezzy Adkins – ambushed and murdered by vigilante.

In South Carolina – textile workers John Blackborough, Lee Crawford, E.M. Knight, Ira Davis, Claude Cannon, C.L. Ricker and Maxie PetersonALL murdered by guards at the Chiguola Mills

In North Carolina – Ernest Riley killed on a picket line.

In Chicago – bakery worker Joseph Piskondwicz killed on a picket line.

In Wisconsin – Leo Wakefield and Henry Engleman were shot down by deputy sheriffs.

In Minnesota – teamsters Henry Ness and John Belor were killed by police.

In Washington – Shelby Daffron and Otto Heland, both longshoremen, lost their lives

In California – Longshoremen Howard Sperry, Nick Bordois, Richard Parker and John Knudsen killed during the Longshoremen Strike.

And in September 1934, textile workers in Woonsocket, Rhode Island, Jude Courtemanche & Leo Rovette fell from tyranny’s bullets as did Charles Gorzynski and William Black on this very hallowed ground in Central Falls where we stand on this Labor Day 2011.

My brothers and sisters, since we stood here on Labor Day one year ago to commemorate the Rhode Island martyrs of the Great Textile Strike of 1934 by erecting this memorial on this spot in the Moshassuck Cemetery to the martyrs of the Saylesville Massacre the renewed attack on the Labor Movement here in Rhode Island and nationally, strongly mirrors the oppressive treatment of workers so long ago.

Nationally, the Supreme Court, in a 5 to 4 decision in the case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, made it possible to allow unlimited amounts of corporate money into the United States political system.  This played a heavy hand in the election of new anti-worker elected officials and the attacks that followed.  – and this madness is what followed in 2011:

Since the November 2010 election, the Big Business/Anti-worker agenda across the United States has introduced Right to Work legislation in fifteen states.

In several states, legislators have attempted to eliminate automatic dues deductions.

In Minnesota – legislators have attempted to take away whistle blower protections for meat packing workers, and over-time pay away from construction workers.

In Maine – Republican Governor Paul LePage removed a mural honoring workers and Maine’s’ labor history from the state’s Department of Labor Building.  He followed that with a Right to Work Law.

Republicans in New Hampshire pushed Right to Work.

In Missouri, in what can only be described as a Tea Party “side- show”, – Republican legislators tried to roll back child labor laws.

In Oklahoma – the Republican controlled legislature passed a law that requires a parent’s consent for teenagers working in a grocery store to be part of the Union.

Republican legislators in Tennessee want to make union rallies and picket lines a crime!

In Pennsylvania – the Republican Governor wants to privatize the state-run liquor stores, jeopardizing more than 500 million in revenue and threatening the wages & benefits of Union members who work in those stores.

In Ohio, the first state to legalize public sector collective bargaining – the Republican super-majority meant that the legislature passed and Governor Kasich signed into Law SB-5 – stripping Ohio’s public employees of the right to bargain collectively with their employers.

And in Wisconsin – the legislature passed and Governor Walker signed a budget that denies teachers, fire fighters and state workers the fundamental right to bargain collectively.

 

RHODE ISLAND SINCE LAST LABOR DAY 

The Westin Hotel in Providence where workers are represented by UNITE/HERE Local 217, attempted to impose a 20% pay reduction, an increase in health insurance costs, and an outsourcing of the jobs of many union workers.

In Providence, the labor movement was once again under attack and used as a scapegoat for the economic woes of the states and municipalities when the School Boards voted to fire all 1,926 teachers on February 4th.

After months of bargaining in good faith, Laborer’s Local 1322, Cranston Bus Drivers were faced with a bleak future when the city council recommended the privatization of the town’s school bus service.

At Amica Insurance in Lincoln, the company eliminated the jobs of 55 maintenance workers by privatizing their department to a contractor with a history of NLRB violations.

IBEW members at Local 2323 were forced out on strike when Verizon officials attempted to take back 50 years of contract negotiations by eliminating job security, slashing pays and benefits, and sending jobs overseas.

And RIGHT HERE in Central Falls, the site of the riots of 1934, the Rhode Island Department of Education waged war on the public school teachers halfway into a three-year contract.  On February 23rd, the Central Falls Board of Trustees voted to issue termination notices to all Central Falls High School teachers.  The Board read each name in a crowded auditorium.

Like the textile strike 77 years ago, the labor strife in Central Falls was once again national news.

AND WHAT DID LABOR DO?

We fought back as we always do.

We stopped the right wing’s agenda to legislate Right to Work Laws in all fifteen attempts this year.

We stopped them from repealing the Minnesota Whistle Blower Act of 1987.

Governor Guy LePage of Maine lost his bid to turn Maine into a Right to Work State.

In New Hampshire, Governor Lynch vetoed the Tea Party’s Right to Work Law the moment it hit his desk.

In Missouri, the anti-union state Senate would not have its way.  We soundly defeated their attempts to eliminate child-labor laws.

Pennsylvania will not be privatizing their liquors stores thanks to an extensive lobbying and education campaign by organized labor.

In Ohio, Governor Kasich’s approval numbers are in the 30’s and his anti-union Collective Bargaining Bill will be on the November 8ballot where the latest poll number show 56 – 32 to repeal.

In Wisconsin, Governor Walker’s numbers are worse than Governor Kasich’s’ after stripping public unions of collective bargaining rights.  And two safe Republican Senators lost their recall election and were replaced by pro-worker candidates.

 

AND WE FOUGHT BACK IN RHODE ISLAND TOO!

THE STATE HOUSE MASSACRE OF 2010

In November the members of Rhode Island unions sent a message to the State House… “If you’re going to run as a Democrat, than you damn well better VOTE like one!” The members proved it by working hard to defeat six incumbent democrats hostile to working families and replaced them with worker friendly democrats.

Westin workers, members of UNITE/HERE Local 217, ratified an agreement after a successful boycott with significant gains to their contract and no privatization of union members’ jobs.

The Providence Teachers Union reached a new three-year Agreement; with all termination notices rescinded.

After intense pressure from organized labor and the general public, the Cranston School Committee decided to end their fool-hardy quest to privatize the ninety bus drivers, members of Laborer’s Union, Local 1322.

IBEW, Local 2323 workers are back to work after being forced out by Verizon three weeks ago after the Company agreed to streamline negotiations and bargain in good faith.

And last week, the Rhode Island Board of Regents voted 7 to 1 to reject charter schools in Cranston.

They can knock us down, but they can’t lick us – this IS Labor Day – in the state which held the first Labor Day Parade in the United States.

And every working man and woman in this state owes a great debt of gratitude to those who were knocked down and got up before and to all of us who continue to fight back today.   We ARE the Labor Movement!

And we say to ALL of you workers – whether you are union or not –

YOU’RE WELCOME!

You’re welcome for:       Eight-hour day

You’re welcome for:    Forty-hour workweek

You’re welcome for:    Child labor laws

You’re welcome for:    Health insurance & Pension benefits

You’re welcome for:    Paid vacations & paid sick days

And you’re welcome for this Labor Day Weekend and every other weekend of the year – because…..

WE ARE THE UNION AND DAMN PROUD OF IT!

Dan Gordon REMOVED from GOP Caucus by a majority vote

From Kathy Gregg @ Projo:

“PROVIDENCE, R.I. – The tiny House Republican caucus has voted to “expel” one of its members: freshman Rep. Daniel P. Gordon Jr. of Portsmouth.

House Minority Leader Brian Newberry confirmed Wednesday that 6 of the 10 House Republicans voted Tuesday afternoon to expel Gordon, at a caucus held at the State House. The meeting was held an hour before the full House and Senate gathered, for the first time in months, for a briefing on the state’s looming pension-crisis.

The reasons for this rare act are not yet entirely clear and Gordon, who describes himself as a self-employed contractor, was not immediately available for comment.”

Not available for comment?  Grow a pair Danny Boy!

“But in response to an inquiry, Newberry made public the letter he sent Gordon on Wednesday, and an earlier letter in which he took Gordon to task for making derogatory comments about his Republican colleagues in various online forums.

In a September 2 warning letter, Newberry said: “Many, many of the comments I have seen have crossed the line into personal invective and attack … It is simply not permissible for you to launch personal attacks against your colleagues. Disagreement is fine and no one is required to like any other member of the House on a personal level.”

But “none of that excuses your conduct or lack of decorum. Your actions are unbecoming of someone holding your office. If they do not cease immediately, I will have no choice but to take the necessary steps to impose appropriate sanctions up to and including possible expulsion as a member of the House Republican Caucus.”

His letter to Gordon on Wednesday began: “I write on behalf of the House Republican Caucus in follow-up to recent conversations and to my letter of September 2nd to inform you that the Caucus met last night and voted to expel you as a member. ”

I said from about a month after he was elected that Dan Gordon was no good.  He is a racist, a homophobe, and a low-life.  I couldnt be happier that this happened to him.  Now he can know once and for all that he IS NOT welcome.  You keep heading up to the State House to play Representative Big Dan, no one needs or wants you there though…

Looks like an easy win for this seat next year…

Providence Journal Losing It’s Tax Cut Religion?

With all the Huricane Irene preperation going on, maybe you missed the monumental shift yesterday in editorial policy at the newspaper of record in Rhode Island.  After years of supporting tax cuts for the elite and encouraging buidgetary policy coddling the CEO class in the hopes that they would through their good graces employ the rest of us….well the Fountain Street gang may be seeing the light….maybe.

And well, since maybe there is some buyers remorse, feel free to link to the Providence Journal’s website to read the editorial.

Join Congressman Cicilline in telling Republican Leaders that Corporations Are NOT People

I know its been conservative philosophy for over a century that under the law corporations are people….but it never really made sense. And to hear Republican leaders like Mitt Romney say it out loud…well, they just need to be called on it. Congressman David Cicilline has an online petition going right now asking Republican leaders to get their priorities right – start focusing on REAL PEOPLE – not phony corporate people.

You and I know that corporations are not people, but in case you missed it last week, one of the leading Republican presidential candidates thinks they are.  That’s right, when former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney actually said out loud that “corporations are people” he articulated what we alI know to be the real priority of the Republican Party, and that is tax cuts and special treatment for corporations while American families continue to try and make ends meet during these tough economic times. Statements from party leaders like Romney really do make you wonder, just whose side are they on?

After this recent debate over our nation’s debt ceiling, it’s now even more clear that theRepublican Party has totally lost sight of who ordinary working families are and what they need.  We know that working families are not corporations, because unlike corporations they have had to bear the brunt of this economic recovery.  As corporations like big oil companies continue to receive taxpayer subsidies and tax breaks are extended to companies that ship American jobs overseas, working families are trying to afford basic things like the higher cost of food, gas, health care and college.  And it doesn’t end there.  While Republicans fight tooth and nail for “corporations” they also propose to make deeps cuts in our most sacred programs like Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and federal student loans for our young people.

I hope you’ll join my petition to Republican leaders to tell them that we want corporations to pay their fair share.

I understand that we cannot continue to ship American jobs overseas and provide additional tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires at the expense of working families.  Congress needs to focus on jobs and securing Medicare and Social Security.  Everyday, I am pushing back against right-wing Republicans as they try to undermine vital services in order to help the special interests, but I cannot do this alone and I need your help to send a strong message that we’re not going to stand for it.

Stand up with me to tell Washington that we need to concentrate on fighting for everyday Americans, and stop protecting the special interests of millionaires and billionaires and the most powerful.

Please sign my petition to tell Republican leaders that corporations are not people, and they need to stop protecting them at the expense of the middle class and working families.

Six RI Legislators Join ALEC, a Pro-Corporate “Model” Legislation Advocate

The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) is a consortium of corporations which drafts and approves “model” legislation for right-wing state legislators on virtually every area of law. As one example, reported by Mike Elk of The Nation, in today’s interview on DemocracyNow!:

“One of the most perverse effects that ALEC has had on American society is the dramatic increase in the amount of prisoners incarcerated in this country. In 1980, there were only half a million people incarcerated in this country. Now that number has quadrupled to nearly 2.4 million…the majority for non-violent offenses. The U.S. has four per cent of the world’s population, but has 25% of the world’s prisoners in this country–and a big part of the reason for that is ALEC.”

As Elk further reports, their advocacy of tougher sentencing laws for drug violations and other offenses benefits the private prison industry–including the Corrections Corporation of America, a member of ALEC. “So they put a mass amount of people in jail,” says Elk, “and then they created a situation where they could exploit that.”

Moreover, using ALEC-approved legislation, states are increasingly using cheap prison labor to displace union workers. Thus, through ALEC’s efforts, are not Blacks, Latinos and poor Whites being subjected to a new form of legalized slavery?

This is but the tip of the iceberg for ALEC’s impact on our political and economic system. As ALECexposed.org summarizes:

“ALEC is not a lobby; it is not a front group. It is much more powerful than that. Through ALEC, behind closed doors, corporations hand state legislators the changes to the law they desire that directly benefit their bottom line. Along with legislators, corporations have membership in ALEC. Corporations sit on all nine ALEC task forces and vote with legislators to approve “model” bills. They have their own corporate governing board which meets jointly with the legislative board. (ALEC says that corporations do not vote on the board.) They fund almost all of ALEC’s operations. Participating legislators, overwhelmingly conservative Republicans, then bring those proposals home and introduce them in statehouses across the land as their own brilliant ideas and important public policy innovations—without disclosing that corporations crafted and voted on the bills. ALEC boasts that it has over 1,000 of these bills introduced by legislative members every year, with one in every five of them enacted into law.”

As cited by ALECexposed.org, six members of the Rhode Island legislature are ALEC members:

  • Sen. Leo Blais
  • Sen. Francis Maher*
  • Sen. Leonidas Raptakis* (Retired to run for Sec. of State)
  • Sen. V. Sosnowski*
  • Sen. Paul Fogarty**
  • Sen. Walter Felag**
  • Rep. Laurence Ehrhardt**

*Alternate, ALEC Energy, Environment and Agriculture Task Force
**Member, ALEC Energy, Environment and Agriculture Task Force

If you are a constituent of any of these members, you may want to ask questions such as these:  Why are you a member of ALEC? What legislative measures have you reviewed?  Have you introduced ALEC legislation at the RI statehouse?  Did you pay the $50 membership fee personally–or did you charge this to taxpayers?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387