No winners in state budget abortion compromise


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
DSC_2195
Nicholas Mattiello

Language added to the Rhode Island 2016 budget by Representative Raymond Gallison before passage somewhat balanced the last minute addition of extreme anti-abortion language submitted by Governor Gina Raimondo.

The new language added to article 18 reads:

(e) Health plans that offer a plan variation that excludes coverage for abortion services as 31 defined in 45 CFR 156.280(d)(i) for a religious exemption variation in the small group market 32 shall treat such a plan as a separate plan offering with a corresponding rate.

Except for religious Employers (as defined in Section 6033(a)(3)(A)(i) of the Internal Revenue Code), employers selecting a plan under this religious exemption subsection may not designate it as the single plan for employees, but shall offer their employees full-choice of small employer plans on the exchange, using the employer-selected plan as the base plan for coverage. The employer is not responsible for payment that exceeds that designated for the employer-selected plan.

An employer who elects a religious exemption variation shall provide written notice to prospective enrollees prior to enrollment that the plan excludes coverage for abortion services as defined in 45 CFR 156.280(d)(1). The carrier must include notice that the plan excludes coverage for abortion services as part of the Summary of benefits and Coverage required by 42 U.S.C. 300g-15.

DSC_2172
Arthur Corvese

Signs of a behind the scenes compromise were apparent based on the odd assortment of representatives who rose to second the amendment, including Rep Edie Ajello, well known for her advocacy of reproductive rights, and Rep Arthur Corvese, well known for publicly and repeatedly referring to legalized abortion as a “culture of death.”

What does the new language mean? At bottom, any non-religious employer, as defined by the IRS, that elects to not include abortion coverage in their employee health plan, must allow employees to opt out of the company plan, and select any other plan, paying any additional costs out of pocket.

Rhode Island is now the first state to build language into the law that protects those who want a health care plan that provides abortion coverage.

Under Federal law, employees must be notified when their plan covers abortion. It does not require, as Rhode Island will under this new language, that employees be notified when they do not have abortion coverage. The language passed last night mandates that employees be told that the chosen plan does not cover abortion before they enroll, and that the lack of abortion coverage is confirmed after enrollment.

Ultimately, the notification requirement is similar to language concerning religious employers who choose not to cover contraception coverage as part of their health plans otherwise mandated by state or federal law.

There is a problem for employees inherent in this language. If my employer doesn’t want to cover abortion due to religious objections, and I decide to opt out of the plan chosen by my company, my employer will know of my objection, and may act in a discriminatory way against me because of my beliefs. I shouldn’t have to worry about job security or job advancement because of my decisions regarding reproductive health care for my family and me. Medical coverage, including reproductive services, are a private matter. How can that privacy be maintained under this provision?

DSC_2145
Lobbyist Healey

Before the passage of the budget, Barth Bracy, executive director of RI Right to Life told me that he and Bernard Healey, State House lobbyist for the Roman Catholic Diocese of Providence, were present to track the progress of the anti-abortion language the Governor inserted. Bracy told me that the language was the result of an agreement made in the wake of Doe v. Burwell, in which an anonymous man sued the state because there were no plans on the exchange that did not cover abortion.

ProJo reporter Richard Salit confirmed this when he wrote that “The lawsuit brought against Rhode Island was withdrawn in May when a Christian legal group said it had been assured that Rhode Island would begin offering multiple plans for abortion foes in 2016. According to HealthSource RI, the state Office of the Health Insurance Commissioner has required that in 2016 insurers offer a choice for abortion foes in every “metal” level (bronze, silver, gold and platinum) that they offer traditional health plans.”

This does not answer the question as to why Rhode Island did not simply require the addition of one plan to not cover abortion, as is required by federal law by 2017. It also does not answer why the amendment came from Governor Raimondo’s office, instead of being introduced as a bill that could be debated and publicly commented on. Had this democratic and open process been followed, the end result may have been more satisfying to all parties.

Despite this large concession to abortion foes, they were still unhappy with the newly added language. A source confided to me that Bracy, Healey and Representative John DeSimone were railing against the compromise language during last minute negotiations.

This makes me wonder if the RI Right to Life and the Providence Roman Catholic Diocese will begin looking for a non-religious employer to bring a Hobby Lobby like lawsuit against HealthSource RI under the state level RFRA (Religious Freedom Restoration Act.) There is little difference between Rhode Island’s RFRA and the federal version the Supreme Court based their Hobby Lobby decision on.

As I pointed out before, this new language may allow a thousand Hobby Lobbies to bloom in Rhode Island.

Tweet

Patreon

Tanzi stumps for South County as budget cuts its tourism funding


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Just because House Finance passed the FY 2016 budget onto the House floor for next Tuesday, doesn’t mean the entire House of Representatives has to like it. In fact, much of the bill is contested – such as the tourism cuts that Representative Teresa Tanzi, Narragansett/South Kingstown, has voiced her opposition to.

The RI House of Representatives before convening on the floor on June 11, 2015
The RI House of Representatives before convening on the floor on June 11, 2015

“When I moved here from Utah, everyone said “Oh, Newport, Providence!” People already know about Newport and Providence and I would say “No, Narragansett,” and nobody would know what Narragansett was. I have a really difficult time turning a portion of our money over from South County to help promote more Providence and more Newport.” she said, citing that the South County tourism board works very hard to market their area of the state.”

In response House Speaker Nick Mattiello said, “Despite that wonderful job, everyone still talks about Providence and Newport. It’s the integrity of the entire system that we’re looking at, and you need a Rhode Island brand. It’s not about localities. The current system doesn’t work, and we cannot go back to a system that doesn’t work.”

Their disagreement stems from Governor Gina Raimondo’s idea to centralize state tourism spending. Currently, Rhode Island has no unified state marketing efforts and instead dives proceeds from hotel tax receipts between 8 regional tourism agencies. The money will now go more towards the state Commerce Corporation, rather than the tourism bureaus themselves. In the House version of the budget, $4.7 million goes straight to the Commerce Corporation, while less than a million goes to the actual tourism district. In Gov. Raimondo’s version, $6.4 million would go to the corporation, leaving the districts with $1.7 million.

Rep. Tanzi (D- District 34). Photo courtesy of http://www.rilin.state.ri.us/
Rep. Tanzi (D- District 34)

After the hearing, Tanzi continued to express her concerns about the funding cuts, and how they will harm her district as a whole.

“I think that the way that the South County tourism board is run is actually very effective. We have been compliant, we turn in our reports when we’re supposed to, our production cost of our marketing materials, everything is done in house. We’re very conscientious about how the money is spent,” she said, especially in comparison to other tourism boards across the state. Tanzi believes that this will only disserve the southern portion of Rhode Island, especially because Newport and Providence, in her opinion, do not need more marketing.

“The beaches are their own unique part of it,” she said. “We need to have our own budget to market that appropriately. We’re competing with the Cape, we’re not competing with Massachusetts.”

As the budget is currently written, Tanzi stated that to “cannibalize” the smaller parts of the state in order to market Rhode Island as a whole is not the best use of money, and it will only show poorly within the coming years.

“My guess is that my businesses in South County, who have five months out of the year at most, to make their living to make it through the entire summer, are going to suffer as a result of this,” she said. Tanzi has spoken to many of the businesses in her district since the budget first came out in March, adding that such funds are always a concern for business owners in the area.

But, the prospect of Tanzi submitting a successful amendment to support her district is slim to none, in her view, calling South County the “small fish,” in comparison to Newport and Providence.

“Just the basic numbers of looking at it, you’re talking about a couple of South County people, versus the city folk and the Newport people, who outnumber us on the floor. So, my chances of an amendment passing are ridiculously infantile. They’re infinitesimal, they’re so small, so, no, I won’t,” she said.

Even without the hope of amending the budget, this year, though, Tanzi still holds out hope for next year, planning to bring forth data showing the exact effects of these cuts on South County tourism, and maybe even get to create a separate brand for her district in the process.

Raimondo’s budget addition allows employers vast discretion on abortion coverage for workers


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Raimondo
Governor Raimondo

Language on abortion nestled into the 2016 Rhode Island State Budget dealing with HealthSource RI may have far reaching consequences for workers whose employers may want to claim a religious exemption from covering the procedure. As reported on RI Future yesterday, Governor Gina Raimondo inserted an 11th hour amendment into the budget that goes far beyond what Federal law mandates as regards abortion access under the Affordable Care Act. Several local organizations have now spoken out about the Governor’s actions.

James Rhodes, director of public policy & government relations at Planned Parenthood Southern New England, said, in a statement,

Planned Parenthood was surprised to see these proposals in the Governor’s budget when it was unveiled last week, and we were not consulted about the new policies contained in this article. Additionally, since there was never a hearing on this language, we have not been able to get clear guidance on the intent of these policies.

“Specifically, there is a fundamental question on which the budget article the House Finance Committee passed on Tuesday night is silent: ‘How does a small employer, whether a religious organization or not, claim a religious exemption from covering abortion?’ Do they have a form to fill out to submit to the Office of Health Insurance Commissioner to declare their objection in order to get a new plan variation from an insurer? Is there any requirement to notify insured employees that their insurance does not cover this service, which is standard coverage in the small group market?

“Fundamentally, Planned Parenthood believes that employers should not be making health decisions around abortion coverage or contraception for their employees. Rhode Island has an opportunity to protect employees by including specific language that would require, at a minimum, notification, to the Insurance Commissioner and employees, that the insurance an employer is offering does not include the full range of reproductive health options, including abortion.”

Steve Brown, executive director of the RI ACLU, also expressed concerns, saying in a statement,

We are extremely disappointed in the Governor’s introduction of polarizing abortion language into the health exchange budget article. Protecting access to abortion is an essential component of comprehensive health coverage, but Article 18 undermines that access.

“It is worth emphasizing that the federal health care law already imposes significant restrictions on abortion access through health care exchanges. The additional burdens that passage of this budget article could impose, particularly on unwitting employees, is deeply troubling.”

As a candidate, Raimondo was happy to accept campaign money from the pro-choice PAC Emily’s List and to accept the endorsement of Planned Parenthood Votes!. Raimondo once said that “women are ‘smart enough’ to make their own health care decisions without interference from government or their employer,” according to a ProJo piece by Katherine Gregg.

Laws that allow employers to make unilateral decisions about a worker’s reproductive healthcare options cut against candidate Raimondo’s claim.

Sam Bell, executive director of the Progressive Democrats of Rhode Island, said in a statement,

For folks who criticized me during the campaign season for saying that Raimondo would be less than fully committed to protecting a woman’s right to choose, this is what I was talking about.

“Restricting insurance coverage of reproductive healthcare is one of the most dangerous ways to erode a woman’s right to choose. The fact of the matter is that wealthier women will always have access to abortions. They can go to another state and pay for the procedure out of pocket. They may have the procedure delayed. They may face institutionalized shaming. But with enough money, they will always have access, no matter how restrictive Rhode Island’s laws get.

“That’s why this new policy is so damaging. It will force lower-income women to choose between carrying a child they don’t want and financial ruin.”

Patreon

Raimondo budget amendment undermines abortion access


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Leadership
Paiva-Weed, Raimondo, Mattiello

The 2016 RI State Budget, approved by House Finance late Tuesday evening, included language on abortion coverage in its section on HealthSource RI funding that goes far beyond what is required under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This part of the budget, inserted at the request of Governor Gina Raimondo on May 29, replaced article 28 of her original budget which the General Assembly changed to Article 18 in its final version.

The part that pertains to abortion coverage reads:

(3) Any health plan that delivers a benefit plan on the exchange that covers abortion services, as defined in 45 CFR section 156.280(d)(1), shall comply with segregation of funding requirements, as well as an annual assurance statement to the Office of the Health Insurance Commissioner, in accordance with 45 C.F.R. sections 156.280(e)(3) and (5).

(4) At least one plan variation for individual market plan designs offered on the exchange at each level of coverage, as defined by section 1302(d)(1) of the federal act, at which the carrier is offering a plan or plans, shall exclude coverage for abortion services as defined in 45 CFR section 156.280(d)(1). If the health plan proposes different rates for such plan variations, each listed plan design shall include the associated rate.

(5) Health plans that offer a plan variation that excludes coverage for abortion services as defined in 45 CFR section 156.280(d)(1) for a religious exception variation in the small group market shall treat such a plan as a separate plan offering with a corresponding rate.

The ACA requires, by 2017, that a Multi-State Plan not covering most abortions be offered on every state-based health exchange. The language above mandates that every insurer operating on HealthSource RI offer multiple plans that do not cover abortion. The budget in its current form does not require that insurers offer plans to cover abortion, so any insurer not interested in offering nearly identical plans may decide to drop such coverage altogether.

The federal mandate that requires at least one plan that does not cover abortion should more than adequately cover those with a well-founded religious objection to abortion so that they can find a health plan to cover their needs.

I have made two requests to the Governor’s office, asking for clarification of the amendment’s intent and the reasoning behind the language, but these have gone unanswered.

Gina Raimondo has always maintained that she is staunchly pro-choice. That she would be behind some of the most audacious anti-choice legislation in decades, and that the language should be inserted into the budget without any public debate or comment may come as a surprise to her supporters.

After receiving the endorsement from the Planned Parenthood Votes! Rhode Island PAC, Raimondo said, ‘The Catholic Church has a clear position and I have a clear position…I am clearly pro-choice.”

But Raimondo’s Budget Article 28, by mandating that every insurer offer multiple plans that do not cover abortion, undermines the accepted medical and legal standard that abortion is a safe and legal procedure. Just as individuals do not get a choice about whether their health insurance covers blood transfusions, erectile dysfunction, or vaccinations, abortion coverage should be treated as an essential health benefit, not an outlier “variation” for which every insurance plan must make an exception.

Patreon

Q&A on the 6/10 Connector


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The 6/10 Connector rips Olneyville and Valley apart from Federal Hill and the West End. Replacing it with a boulevard would be less expensive and reconnect these neighboring parts of the city.

With Governor Raimondo’s recent push for transportation funding, people are talking about patching up the 6/10 Connector vs. replacing it with a boulevard. Best practice in urban design recommends replacing urban highways with boulevards. But that would be something we haven’t done before in Rhode Island, so it’s understandable that some people have concerns. Here are a few questions I thought you might have about updating the 6/10 Connector for the 21st century.

  1. That’s a big change. Wouldn’t it be expensive to remove the highway?Governor Raimondo is proposing a tractor-trailer toll that would allow the state to bond for $700 million. $400 million of that (plus another $400 million RIDOT wants to get from the Feds) is earmarked for the 6/10 Connector repairs. That is expensive.

    Prices vary a lot for building highways, but urban highways with as many overpasses as the 6/10 Connector tend to be on the high end of the scale (and $800 million is quite high). Boulevards (think Memorial Boulevard in Providence, but more multimodal) tend to have a cost roughly ten times lower than an urban highway. Imagine how many structurally-deficient bridges we could make safe with an extra $360-720 million? That’s a very rough cost comparison, but what we can be sure of is that replacing the 6/10 Connector with a boulevard (even tripped out with the best complete streets features you can think of) would cost dramatically less than rebuilding it as a highway.

  2. So many cars use the connector! Wouldn’t removing it create massive traffic jams?Actually many cities have removed excessive urban highways and seen no marked increase in traffic. There are a couple reasons for this. Traffic is created through a process called “induced demand” where if you build more highways, drivers will use them. Conversely, if you eliminate an urban highway, fewer people will use it as a short-cut.

    “But wait!” you say. “I use 6/10 as a shortcut! You want to reduce my transportation options!” Actually, in other cities that remove urban highways, they see the traffic that previously used the highway spread out over the city’s other streets. And there’s less potential for traffic jams when drivers have lots of options. It’s like how bugs congregate around lights on hot summer nights, but out in the dark it’s less buggy. 6/10 is the bug-clogged light, city streets are the cool night air.

    And one more thing: our current transportation network overwhelmingly favors driving; it has big highways that cut swaths through neighborhoods that are uninviting to other ways of getting around. Leveling the playing field by making our street system more comfortable for more ways of getting around (RIPTA, walking, and biking as well as driving) gives you more choices and more freedom. Plus, it means more other people are choosing to walk or bike and they’re not clogging up the road in front of you.

  3. It’ll never happen. We can’t do innovative things in Rhode Island.I mean, this isn’t that innovative. And hey, we started the Industrial Revolution and moved rivers to revitalize downtown Providence. I think we have it in us to make a prudent economic decision to give Rhode Islanders more transportation options and safer bridges.

    Plus, you cynics, politicians like ribbon-cuttings and ground-breakings. It’s not as sexy to photo-shoot the replacement of an archaic 1950s-era project as it is to pose for the first complete multi-modal corridor in the State.

We can assume that because the 6/10 Connector is in Raimondo’s investment plan, now is the time that something will happen with it. The state should choose the approach that is best for the neighborhoods adjacent to the corridor, which coincidentally is the option with the best return on investment. Replace the 6/10 Connector with an urban boulevard.

Want to help make this happen? Transport Providence is organizing a walk around the area in question today at 5:15 with Providence City Councilman Bryan Principe. The best thing you can do is to talk to people about this. Which people? Especially your representatives (state, federal, and city if you live in Providence), the Governor’s office, and RIDOT.

Medicaid on the Move


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Strengthening Rhode Island Medicaid_Final_5 8 15.020The 7th Annual Budget Policy Conference, a fundraiser for the Economic Progress Institute (EPI), had a timely theme: “Medicaid on the Move.”

Since Governor Gina Raimondo announced a Medicaid crisis in February and the creation of a working group of “27 members from across health care, business, state government and community and nonprofit organizations” to deal with the crisis, the idea of “Reinventing Medicaid” has become a central part of the state’s 2016 budget process.

Medicaid is a state and federally supported system of health care that targets the most vulnerable and least represented people in our community, i.e. children, low income adults, the elderly and those with mental or physical handicaps. So special attention must be paid to the process of “reinventing” the system and therefore an appropriate target for a progressive economic institute such as EPI to address.

Governor Raimondo gave the opening address to the breakfast crowd, mostly made up of medical policy wonks and EPI supporters. She used the opportunity to press for a $10.10 minimum wage and for an increase in the earned income tax credit from 10 to 15 percent, possibly her two most progressive ideas in her 2016 budget proposal.

Moving onto Medicaid, Raimondo insisted that her goal in pulling together the working group is “not about kicking people off Medicaid” but “getting people cared for in the lowest cost environment.”

Raimondo acknowledged that the EPI and many of those in the audience are more concerned with social justice and economic justice than they are with short term budget fixes when she said, near the end of her speech, “Your stubborn idealism is a good thing for Rhode Island, so don’t lose it.”

Linda Katz, policy director and co-founder of the EPI, spent 14 minutes introducing the audience to the basic facts about Medicaid. In the video below I’ve combined the slides from her presentation with the talk she gave.

Katz is a member of the Reinventing Medicaid working group. The first weeks of work by the working group, Katz suggested, was preliminary. Now, as the working group prepares to move ahead and plan the implementation of the ideas presented, Katz says that she’s “looking forward to part two, where we take a deeper dive into Medicaid.”

Cindy Mann, former Medicaid Director in the Obama Administration, began her talk noting that this July will mark the 50th anniversary of Medicaid. Medicaid, says Mann, “is constantly reinventing itself.”

Over the course of her talk Mann explained exactly who Medicaid serves, and why Rhode Island is in many ways both an outlier and a leader in the way we administer the program. In the video below I’ve combined the slides from her presentation with the talk she gave.

For instance, “Rhode Island has, as a population, more elderly and disabled” than many other states, said Mann. Three percent of our Medicaid enrollees account for 70 percent of our Medicaid spending.

Mann made a special point to mention the medical care of the incarcerated, surely the population our society seems least vested in. When people in our prisons require outpatient care, that is, medical services the prison hospital is unable to meet, Medicaid covers the expense. Mann maintained that the state should make sure that “no one leaves jail without being assessed for health care coverage.”

Former Lt. Governor Elizabeth Roberts, who Governor Lincoln Chafee tasked with setting up the state’s health care exchange and who Raimondo put in charge of the working group, spoke last.

Roberts said that she and the working group instead worked to reform the system. “We did not remove benefits,” said Roberts. In addition to the recommendations of the working group, Roberts feels that there needs to be a pay increase for certified nursing assistants and home health care workers, who are being squeezed economically.

Roberts also agreed with Katz about the second phase of the working group’s mission. The “next 2 months,” said Roberts, “will be more important than the last 2.” The working group issues its final report in July.

Patreon

Progressives, conservatives unite to fight downtown ballpark


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

SkeffingtonAn unlikely coalition of opponents to the proposed downtown Providence stadium deal greeted new PawSox owner Jim Skeffington as he exited his chauffeured ride and quickly entered the Rhode Island Commerce Corporation (RICC) offices at 315 Iron Horse Way.

Representatives and members of the RI Tea Party, The Republican Party, the Progressive Democrats of Rhode Island, The Green Party, Direct Action for Rights and Equality, Occupy Providence, The Rhode Island Sierra Club, RI Taxpayers, The Rhode Island Libertarian Party, and the Capital Good Fund stood side by side to take a stand against corporate welfare.

This event was put together by Coalition Radio’s Pat Ford and David Fisher, with help from Lauren Niedel of the Progressive Democrats. Ford acted as emcee for the event, in which 13 speakers and one poet spoke to a crowd of about 80 people. Inside the RICC offices, more than 100 more people attended the meeting where Skeffington and other PawSox owners revealed that they were amenable to negotiating a better deal.

Gina Raimondo essentially rejected the first deal offered, which would have, in the words of more than one speaker, “socialized the risk and privatized the profits” of the new venture.

Pat Ford spoke first, saying that “it is not the role of government to subsidize risk for private enterprise.”

Lauren Niedel of the Rhode Island Progressive Democrats put the deal into stark economic relief: As Rhode Island prepares to carve $90 million out of Medicaid, how can we justify giving away millions of dollars to millionaires?

Andrew Posner, executive director of the Capital Good Fund, said that “every day I look at families that are hungry, that are poor, that don’t have jobs… that’s what we should be spending our time and money talking about.”

The Tea Party’s Mike Puyana said that the deal is “something called crony corporatism, it’s as far from equality under the law as it’s possible to get.”

“I don’t think I ever imagined that i was going to be at a rally with the Tea Party on the same side,” said Fred Ordonez of DARE, “but here we are!”

On a more serious note, Ordonez said, “Every time we see a huge development get all kinds of tax breaks and tax subsidies, the poor communities in providence get poorer and poorer.”

Larry Girouard, of Rhode island Taxpayers, said that a new stadium downtown is the last thing we need to spur economic growth. “The issue is taxes, regulation, infrastructure. This is just a diversion from the real problems.

The Green Party, represented by Greg Gerritt, brought up some of the environmental concerns, such as the risks of moving the new sewer line. “When you do things like that, you can do it right, but often it introduces more leaks into a system.”

“The state of Rhode Island has no business taking money out of the hands of taxpayers and giving it to millionaires,” said Gina Catalano of the Rhode Island Republican Party, “to be expected to make that investment with zero return, is ludicrous.”

Representing the Sierra Club, Asher Schofield, owner of the small business Frog and Toad, hit the crowd with a baseball metaphor, and tried to inspire us all towards something better.

Providence is not a minor league city. We are what we dream ourselves to be. What we want to be. And we want to be major league. These are antiquated notions, the idea of public financing of private enterprise. This [deal] is not the grand notion that we need to have as a city moving forward… These minor league aspirations are beneath us.”

This deal, says Rhode Island Libertarian Party leader Mike Rollins, “is the exact opposite of everything we stand for.”

Occupy Providence’s Randall Rose made excellent points, and even read from a textbook about how bad it is for cities to invest money in minor league baseball teams. Rose read from the book Minor League Baseball and Local Economic Development, noting that, “there have been books on this, the scam is run so often.”

“The economic impact of a minor league team,” read Rose, “is not sufficient to justify the relatively large public expenditure for a minor league stadium.”

Steve Frias of the Republican Party, noted that the assembled crowd was comprised of people with “different viewpoints, but we all agree that this is a stupid deal.”

Roland Gauvin, an independent political activist, promised politicians who support such efforts that “a vote for this is the last time [politicians] will ever be voting, because we will vote them out of office.” Gauvin had especially choice words for Speaker of the House Nicholas Mattiello, saying, “And I will be willing to go to any district in Rhode island, starting in Mattiello’s district, and work my way down.”

Finally, before the crowd moved inside to join the RICC meeting already in progress, Cathy Orloff lead the crowd in a participatory poem against the stadium, with five baseball references built in.

DSC_5146
Skeffington

DSC_5160

DSC_5161

DSC_5188

DSC_5219

DSC_5253

DSC_5254
Roland Gauvin
DSC_5281
Pat Ford
DSC_5282
David Fisher
DSC_5286
Steven Frias and Greg Gerritt

DSC_5290

DSC_5299
Asher Schofield

DSC_5307

DSC_5315
Lauren Niedel

DSC_5319

DSC_5321

DSC_5331

DSC_5342
Andrew Posner

DSC_5353

DSC_5362
Mike Puyana
DSC_5367
Cathy Orloff
DSC_5374
Fred Ordonez
DSC_5382
Larry Girouard

DSC_5389

DSC_5394
Mike Rollins
DSC_5403
Randall Rose

DSC_5423

Patreon

Home care workers squeezed by inconsistent messaging/policy


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Screen Shot 2015-04-09 at 10.36.09 AMSince two-thirds of minimum wage earners are women, Governor Gina Raimondo says that raising the minimum wage to $10.10 is an important way to help women and their families in Rhode Island. But Nicholas Oliver, executive director of Rhode Island Partnership for Home Care, Inc., a group that advocates for the home health care industry here in Rhode Island, says that the governor is “being a bit disingenuous, and we’ve seen that her messaging is a bit inconsistent.” More than 88 percent of home health care workers are women, and Raimondo’s budget isn’t helping them.

The governor is “saying that she wants to be an advocate for home care,” continues Oliver in a phone conversation, “particularly with this working group Reinventing Medicaid, but frankly we haven’t seen her put her money where her mouth is. She put into her budget proposal last month a freeze on home health care for another consecutive fiscal year.”

In testimony before the Senate Labor Committee hearing on the $10.10 minimum wage, Oliver explained that “Medicaid home and community based service rates have been frozen for the past seven consecutive fiscal years. However, much of that last rate increase in 2008 was rescinded the following fiscal year due to state budget constraints. So what we’re really talking about is 13 years since a rate increase…”

Medicaid reimbursements for home health care services are $17.68 an hour in Rhode Island. In addition to the worker’s salary, that money has to cover insurance, licensing, utilities, compliance and other expenses. “Many of our direct care staff, CNAs and home makers are earning wages at or slightly above the minimum wage. At current reimbursement rates we cannot afford to provide them a wage that is adequate, let alone competitive to their counterparts in nursing homes and hospitals that have received increases by the General Assembly almost every year.”

Medicaid reimbursements for similar services in Connecticut and Massachusetts are $24.40 and $24.64. “Why would someone work for minimum wage in a position that requires licensing by the Department of Health, continuing education to maintain that licensure, perform services that include toileting, bathing and feeding patients, at the same wage as someone working in retail or hospitality?” Oliver asked the Senate Committee, “The job market is responding with a resounding ‘no’ as many provider industries are having trouble hiring and maintaining direct care staff to fill the growing need for these services by Medicaid beneficiaries.”

The problem in finding workers for the money available is especially acute outside Providence, in places like southern Rhode Island and Woonsocket. Many workers are simply crossing the border into neighboring states where the money is better.

“We don’t want to oppose increasing the minimum wage,” says Oliver, “We’re really disappointed that the governor is proposing to increase the minimum wage and wants to be an advocate for minorities and women and single parents, but at the same time her message is inconsistent when it comes to health care because she’s saying, ‘Let’s increase wages for these folks, but not you, even though you’re a representative of the same work force I try to advocate for.’”

In her 2016 budget proposal, Governor Raimondo has suggested a 3 percent cut to nursing homes and a 5 percent cut to hospitals. The Reinventing Medicaid working group will issue its report and suggestions for additional cuts later this month. You can view Oliver’s testimony before the Senate Labor Committee below:

Patreon

Reinventing Medicaid should be about values, not dollars


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
DSC_1629
Elizabeth Roberts

Near the end of the public commentary period of the Reinventing Medicaid Town Hall Meeting held in Providence, Bonnie Holder observed that, “The measure of a society is based on how we treat our most vulnerable… How did we ever get to the point where we accept it as a society where 1 percent of the population can have enormous wealth and the rest of us here are fighting?”

What the standing room only crowd of nearly 200 people gathered in the foyer of the Providence Community Health Center on Prairie Avenue were fighting for was the funds needed to provide care and sustenance for children, the elderly, the poor and the homeless. Governor Gina Raimondo is seeking to cut $90 million out of Medicaid, an item that takes up about a third of the budget. Because the federal government matches state medicaid spending, the total of lost dollars to medical services in our state could be nearly double that number.

A steady stream of commentators took the microphone to say that our medical system is already straining to meet the needs of our community. Wages are stagnant, demand is only going to grow, and the money needed to get the job done right is already too tight.

Undoubtedly there are savings to be had. Where those savings are to be found is a question of values and priorities. Are we going to force front line caregivers to work longer hours for less pay? Are we going to ask people to give up medical care and prescriptions that will enhance their quality of life? Or are we going to take a serious look at the salaries and compensation packages of some of the best paid CEOs in New England?

Kathy053
SEIU 1199 New England

The Town Hall in Providence was the second of four meetings. The first was held in Woonsocket on Monday night. The next one is scheduled for March 23 at the Peace Dale Library in Kingstown and the last one will be held on April 1 at the Portsmouth Fee Public Library in Portsmouth.

Stay tuned.

Former Congressman Ed Beard was the first speaker. Now a patient in a nursing home, Beard, now 74,  suffers from Parkinson’s and was confined to a wheelchair. At one point a nurse’s assistant came forward to steady his hand so that he could hold the microphone.  “I know cuts will be damaging,” he said, “Just be very cautious when you talk about the seniors. The seniors are a forgotten lot.”

“I am one of hundreds of CNAs in this state who provide personal, bedside care to elders in our nursing homes. My job is physically and emotionally demanding but highly gratifying… I am really concerned that the nursing homes are going to funding cuts again this year…”

“If we don’t have enough to help these people, to pay our nurses, what are we going to do? In our nursing homes, if we have 2 nurses for 6 patients now, what’s going to happen if we have a bunch of cuts?”

“It’s not pleasant to be poor. To wonder whether or not one will eat today, or have enough heat to heat one’s house or even to have a house to live in…”

 “If my wife went to a nursing home, in three years I would be broke. I would have to go on welfare…”

“The corrections department is actually the largest provider of behavioral healthcare in the state…”

“These are people dependent on others for 24 hour care. They cannot safely remain at home, they’re aged and frail, they may have lost their independence, many of those closest to them have died, they rely on us for everything…”

 “As a person living with mental illness and working in the mental health field, I want to stress the idea of peer support. Peer support is important to people living with mental illness… Medicaid should support peer supporters in the mental health system…”

“Permanent supportive housing is an inexpensive way to really effect some true Medicaid savings.”

“A ton of money is saved by being able to point them to either a health center or to a primary care doctor…”

“When we think about cutting some of the costs in Medicaid, home care only accounts for 5 percent of the money that is being spent…”

“Many executives make over six figures, and other executives make millions. Governor Raimondo has set an excellent example with taking a 5 percent pay cut to her salary. Perhaps our hospital and nursing home executives should do the same…”

“We have many patient cases where they cannot afford their medication, they stretch out their medication or split their pills or take their medication every other day. We then see that when these same patients become eligible for Medicaid, their compliance increases, and they become advocates in their own health care.”

“The nurses… throughout the state providing home healthcare, reimbursement rates have been frozen for eight years now…”

“I specifically want to talk about the significance of non emergency medical transportation…”

“Here’s what Medicaid pays for nursing home care: $6.30 an hour…”

“It’s just not what one does that matters, it’s how one does it. And how we choose to reform Medicare will have an impact for generations to come…”

“It’s established that the single greatest that reduces mortality among seniors is isolation…”

“More than 28,000 children in providence receive RICARE benefits…”

“I was distressed to hear about the Medicaid fund reductions. I know the federal government is making cuts…”

“I take care of children who, if there’s no nurse in the home, those parents don’t go to bed. And if there’s no nurse in the home for a couple of days, those parents cannot take care of that child…”

“If you have to increase what you provide in a healthcare setting and your dollars are being cut, there’s only a few places that money is going to come from. Labor and staff, food and medication. So if that’s what we’re looking at cutting, labor, food, staff and medication, shame on everybody in this state…”

DSC_1617DSC_1634DSC_1640DSC_1653DSC_1663DSC_1666DSC_1674DSC_1681DSC_1691DSC_1696DSC_1712DSC_1724DSC_1729DSC_1745DSC_1773

Patreon

Raimondo budget: cuts to Medicaid, taxes on vacation homes


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

raimondo tanziGovernor Gina Raimondo’s proposed budget would cut funding to the poor, fully fund the state education aid formula and create new taxes on high-end second homes and rental properties. You can read her full address to the House and Senate here.

Most significantly, Raimondo seeks to cut about $91 million from Medicaid, socialized health programs for poor people, and has already appointed a high profile task force to “reinvent” the program. It costs $2.3 billion a year, but about half of that is paid for through the federal government. Raimondo has already identified about $45 million in cuts and her budget executive summary says the task force is expected to find another $46 million.

But the poor aren’t the only ones who will pay to balance the budget. So will the state’s beach culture, as she’s proposing a new tax on million dollar second homes and AirBnB-style rentals.

raimondo2

The proposal calls for what has quickly been dubbed the “Taylor Swift tax”- a property tax levied on second homes worth more than $1 million. It will raise $11.8 million in new revenue, according to this briefing.

She’s also proposing an “AirBnB tax” that would raise $7.1 million in new revenue. From the executive summary: “The budget also closes an existing loophole that exempts vacation houses and small bed and breakfasts from paying the sales and lodging taxes. Finally, the budget would apply sales and local lodging taxes to unlicensed rentals, which have increasingly become an alternative to hotels, bed and breakfasts and other licensed lodging.”

raimondo3Both these taxes will disproportionately affect the touristy areas of Rhode Island – the islands and South County. But Senate President Teresa Paiva Weed, of Newport, where untaxed vacation rentals and million dollar second homes are commonplace, didn’t seem to mind.

“I think it’s a bold and brave look across the spectrum,” Paiva Weed said. “Just as she is asking for $90 million in Medicaid savings she is also reaching out to our wealthiest citizens to also assist us in moving forward.”

Even House Speaker Nick Mattiello, who never met a tax he didn’t want to cut, gave some early – though conditional – support to the Taylor Swift tax. “It’s an interesting initiative,” he said. “It seems like something I’d be inclined to support but right now I want to look at the details of it.”

education budgetAs did her predecessor, she is fully funding the state education aid formula – for an overall increase of $34 million from the previous year.

Raimondo also called for statewide all-day kindergarten, and an end to the school construction moratorium. Through refinancing debt, she proposes a $20 million “to create a capital fund to help address school facility needs.”

According to the executive summary, “Lifting the moratorium and setting the annual construction aid appropriation at $80.0 million starting in FY 2017 will create fiscal stability with predictable funding and allows for projects to be prioritized.”

Raimondo would like to see the Earned Income Tax Credit increased from 10 to 15 percent in one or two years, depending on the early summer revenue predictions. Massachusetts Earned Income Tax Credit is 15 percent and Connecticut’s is 27.5 percent.

Her proposed budget would raise an additional $7.1 million by increase by 25 cents the tax on a pack of cigarettes.

To promote construction, Raimondo proposes, “a package of real estate tax incentives will encourage construction of job-producing projects, with a focus on development near transit hubs and historic structures. The package includes Rebuild Rhode Island tax credits, tax increment financing, and partial assistance for local tax stabilization agreements that will make investing in construction and development in Rhode Island a compelling proposition,” according to the executive summary.

raimondo ruggerioShe’s also proposing what she calls the Anchor Tax Credit. “This tax credit incentivizes our largest employers —the anchors of our economy — to attract their suppliers and affiliates to Rhode Island. These employers will benefit from proximity to their suppliers, while the state gains new jobs and develops industry clusters,” said the executive summary.

As well as a Job Creation Tax Initiative. “There is strong support in the General Assembly for a competitive tax

initiative to incentivize employers to create new jobs. The Governor will work with leaders in the General Assembly to enact a package to promote job creation in Rhode Island. Any such initiative must include rigorous accountability provisions and a requirement that the investments’ benefits outweigh their costs,” the executive summary said.

Text of Gov. Raimondo’s budget address


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Here’s a link to Governor Raimondo’s budget website and below is the text, as prepared, of her budget address to the House and Senate tonight:

raimondoSpeaker Mattiello, Senate President Paiva Weed, Members of the General Assembly, the Judiciary, the Cabinet, City and Town Leaders, and my fellow Rhode Islanders.

Good Evening. It is an honor to stand before you to address how we can work together to expand opportunities for all Rhode Islanders and create jobs.

The budget I present to you tonight is rooted in the core belief that every hardworking family deserves the chance to make it in Rhode Island. Despite starting with a nearly $200M deficit, this budget is balanced, makes significant progress towards eliminating our structural deficit, involves no broad based tax increases, and calls for significant investments in economic growth and education.

From my first conversation with Speaker Mattiello and Senate President Paiva Weed, we agreed that priority one was jumpstarting our economy and creating jobs. I couldn’t ask for better partners in this effort and I’d like to thank you both for the time and support you’ve given me these past few months.

Our biggest problem is that our state’s economic engine is out of gas – we’ve lost 80K manufacturing jobs in the last few decades and we haven’t positioned ourselves for job-creation in advanced industries with higher growth and higher wage jobs. The jobs we are creating are low wage and, as a result, our per capita income is about $47K a year compared to $57K in Massachusetts and $60K in Connecticut. We remain among the last states in the nation in employment and in job growth, and we are one of the oldest states in America because our young people are fleeing to find work elsewhere.

All most people want is the chance to earn a decent living that lets them provide for their family. Parents want the chance to give their children a better life than they themselves led.

That’s what my parents wanted. My mom is here tonight – she and my dad worked so hard to provide stability for our family.

But now, not enough Rhode Islanders have the opportunity to do the same for their children because we aren’t creating enough good jobs, and too many of the jobs we are creating don’t pay a sufficient wage.

Our weak economy contributes to our budget deficit, forcing us into the same crunch every year: not enough jobs means lower state revenue, so we make painful cuts to balance the budget. But some of those cuts have been to economic development or infrastructure, which hurt our economy more. It is time to break this downward spiral and set in motion a virtuous cycle of progress and momentum driven by economic growth.

We need to cut in areas where we are inefficient or spend too much, and then invest in economic growth. Over time, our growth will lead to even more revenue, which will allow for further investments in education, infrastructure, and an adequate safety net.

Our turnaround won’t happen overnight but we have to start immediately because Rhode Islanders are struggling right now.

A couple of weeks ago, I was at the Warwick Mall reading to kids, and a young mom told me about how she was barely scraping by.

I took my mom shopping and a man who has worked the same full time retail job for more than a decade told me that he can barely sleep because he’s worried about the fact that there’s no money in his checking account.

We need to give a boost to Rhode Islanders who are working hard and trying to provide a decent living for their family. No one who works full-time should be forced to raise their family in poverty.

That’s why I’d like to work with you to raise the minimum wage to $10.10 an hour.

We need to do more to make work pay.

This budget expands the Earned Income Tax Credit from 10% to 15% over the next two years, putting more money directly in the pockets of working Rhode Islanders. If the revenue forecasts in May improve, I’d love to see us go to 15% this year.

It also eliminates state taxes on Social Security benefits for low and middle income seniors. Social Security is a crucial source of income for these seniors, and we should help them make ends meet. Speaker Mattiello is a leader in this effort and I am pleased to work with him to make it happen.

These steps will help families live a little more comfortably. But they will also stimulate our economy, because we know these folks will spend this money in our local economy.

And as this immediate action takes hold, we must together turn our attention to taking bold steps to create opportunities for Rhode Island.

I propose a bold comprehensive jobs plan that operates in waves with the first wave being the most robust to kick start our effort. We can’t sit back and expect jobs to appear.

This budget sets us on the path to Rhode Island’s comeback by focusing on three things:

First, building the skills our students and workers need to compete in the 21st century.

Second, attracting entrepreneurs and investment.

And third, fostering innovation, including in our state government, to enhance accountability and deliver value to taxpayers.

These principles — and an unwavering focus on creating jobs and expanding opportunity — guided every decision we made in assembling this budget.

Helping people build the skills they need to succeed is one of the best investments we can make.

Since being elected, I have dedicated time every week to talk with businesses, asking them what it will take to add jobs in Rhode Island. The thing I hear most often is that they want a skilled workforce, ready to work. We need to provide people with the training so Rhode Island is a more desirable place for 21st century businesses to invest.

This budget invests in each rung of the ladder – our schools, college affordability, and skills training for adults.

This budget invests record amounts in our K-12 public schools.

This budget also commits the necessary matching funds that allow us to more than triple the number of state sponsored pre-k classrooms in Rhode Island. It’s never too early to put our youngest learners on a path to opportunity.

And we still have almost 2,000 kindergarten students who don’t have access to full-day K. My husband and I know firsthand how much our kids flourished because of all day K and every Rhode Island kid deserves the same opportunity.

Senate President Paiva Weed is passionate about this too and I’m eager to work with her and others to bring universal full day Kindergarten to every school by September 2016. This budget makes it possible.

Teachers want it. Parents want it. And our kids need it. Let’s get it done. But how are students supposed to learn if they’re in crumbling school buildings?

Too many of our children go to school each day in buildings that have outdated heating systems; that lack modern security or technology for 21st century learning; or suffer from general disrepair.

And so, the time has come to lift the current moratorium on school construction.

My budget proposes creating a new School Building Authority to partner with cities and towns to address critical renovation needs. We are seeding it with $20 million this year, and to keep it going, starting next year, we’ll create a long-term and stable source of funds for this purpose.

We’ll put our kids in better schools. And we’ll put construction crews to work, many of whom haven’t seen steady work in years.

Building skills also means making education more relevant and effective. I propose an initiative called “Prepare RI” to empower every high school student across the state who qualifies to take college courses while they’re in high school at no cost to the student. Whether you want to go to college, or start a career right after high school, we want to make your path to a degree or industry certification more affordable and more attainable.

My dad took advantage of the GI Bill and became the first person in our family to go to college. That enabled him to get a good job. One person going to college changed all of our lives. Now more than ever, higher education can be the ladder to the middle class because in today’s economy high wage jobs go to people with high skills.

But for too many a college degree is out of reach because of the cost.

So I propose restructuring our higher education grant programs to create a last-dollar scholarship that begins to tackle the unmet financial need of Rhode Island students. In its first year, this program will invest $10M in students with proven academic performance but for whom the costs of higher education might too high and prevent them from going.

I propose we do this by restructuring and consolidating redundant bureaucracies, specifically moving the Rhode Island Higher Education Assistance Authority to the Office of the Post Secondary Commissioner. These moves will enable the state to save money and fund these scholarships for Rhode Islanders. This is the right thing to do – let’s do it together.

Even with these scholarships, we know that college costs are a lot to bear. So we’re establishing a competitive student loan forgiveness program for college graduates who pursue careers in technology, engineering and design. This program will fully cover four years’ worth of student debt for over 100 high achieving graduates per year. We want to stop the brain drain and keep these talented Rhode Islanders in Rhode Island after they graduate, especially in these fields.

Everyone knows that the global economy is changing and to compete we have to provide people access to opportunities to build the skills they need to get a job now.

Soon, I will announce a new approach to workforce training where we partner with businesses to make sure we’re training people for the jobs that actually exist now. This new system won’t require additional money in the budget, but will use existing funds to help Rhode Islanders get jobs, and help businesses get the well-trained workers they need. The difference is that we will put the employer at the center so we’re training people for jobs that are in demand now.

While we are building skills we also have to cultivate conditions to make Rhode Island an attractive place to do business and add jobs.

We’ve already begun addressing our regulatory climate. We are modernizing the way we issue regulations to make sure we’re as business-friendly as possible while still protecting our quality of life, air, water, and public safety. And we’re reviewing old regulations to see what we can eliminate.

We’re clearing away burdensome underbrush in other areas, too. After examining the over 300 licensed occupations in Rhode Island, we have identified about 30 that we can eliminate immediately. Wherever possible we should remove burdensome layers of bureaucracy to promote more economic activity.

The General Assembly to its great credit, recently cut the corporate tax rate to make us more competitive. But it’s no secret that Rhode Island’s taxes remain uncompetitive in some areas. Tonight I propose building on your good work.

To reduce business’s energy costs, I am proposing that we phase-out the sales tax on energy that the state imposes on commercial users. This will provide $5.1 million in tax relief to businesses next fiscal year, and help reduce the burden of rising energy costs.

We also have some taxes that are just a nuisance on businesses and don’t raise much revenue for the state. For instance, we are one of the only states that places special taxes on imaging centers and outpatient health services. To help contain health care costs and promote job creation in the healthcare industry, I am recommending phasing out both of these surcharges over four years.

Despite all this, let’s face it, Rhode Island has developed a reputation as a tough place to do business.

So to get companies to invest and create jobs here, we need to be proactive. This is especially true because so many other states offer incentives and have much more robust economic development efforts. If we want to compete…if we want companies to add jobs here, we can’t put ourselves at such a disadvantage relative to our neighbors.

It is time for our economic development strategy to turn heads, change perceptions, and put Rhode Island back in the game. Now I know we’ve made mistakes in economic development in the past. We must learn from them and never repeat them. We must move forward.

This budget proposes investing to attract high-quality companies, and encouraging the growth of businesses already here.

We are working with the legislature to introduce competitive tax packages that encourage businesses to create well-paying jobs, particularly well-paying jobs in promising industries.

We will implement these credits with rigorous accountability provisions, and won’t spend a dollar of state money until long after the jobs have been created.

There’s so much construction booming in Boston that they say the state bird of Massachusetts is the crane. I want job-producing construction here, so we propose creating a new initiative to encourage more real estate projects. These benefits will only be provided after the buildings are built, and are modeled after similar successful programs in other states.

Small businesses are the backbone of our state, and our comeback cannot occur without ensuring they are healthy and growing. Unlike our neighboring states, Rhode Island lacks a state-backed small business loan fund. So we will create a Small Business Program and an Innovation Initiative to expand access to capital for small businesses enabling them to thrive and expand.

Also, to leverage the businesses we already have, we will implement an Anchor Tax Credit that incentivizes our large employers to attract their suppliers to Rhode Island. These employers will benefit from having more of their suppliers close by, and the state will gain new businesses and jobs. If we are going to turn our economy around, everyone has a role to play, including our largest employers.

I am also proposing a series of steps to grow our innovation economy. Since 2010, over 1 million jobs have been created in America in advanced industries marked by technology and innovation – these industries pay more and are growing faster than most. It’s time Rhode Island got its fair share of these jobs for our families.

It is not the time to be passive or timid. We’re falling behind other states, and unemployed or underemployed Rhode Island families are bearing the brunt. If we succeed in sparking a recovery and creating jobs, everything is possible. If we don’t, nothing else will matter.

Finally, we must reinvigorate state government with fresh ideas and new ways of doing things in order to get better results. This starts with an honest and ethical government that the public deserves.

A key innovation priority this year is reinventing Medicaid.

It isn’t sustainable to have a system that has the second highest cost per enrollee of any state in the nation — a cost that is 60% higher than the national average and where a small percent of the enrollees account for the vast majority of the spending.

We have an opportunity to deliver better health care services to Rhode Islanders, and to make our system more affordable at the same time. To do so, we will have to crack down on fraud and waste; improve quality and coordination of care; and make Rhode Island a leader in health innovation by paying for value not volume.

I recently learned of a story from one of our health centers of a homeless man who was in the ER once a week with substance abuse issues. The health center would treat him, but until the root cause was addressed his cost of care continued to mount.

This is why our work to address Medicaid’s structural problems will continue beyond this evening with our working group.

I realize this working group is different than the way we’ve addressed medicaid in the past, but I believe the magnitude and complexity of the challenges we face requires it. And I am grateful to the General Assembly leadership for their flexibility as we work in partnership to find solutions. We have an opportunity with all the stakeholders at the table to put in place changes that will yield savings for years to come. This budget proposes a 9 percent cut in Medicaid expansion this year.

I intend to deliver a budget amendment to more specifically identify the cost savings that the working group generates. The working group is similar to a successful effort in New York.

Our redesigned system will focus on providing a coordinated system of care that delivers better outcomes, and delivers better value for taxpayers.

It’s also long past time to modernize our antiquated personnel rules in state government.We want to recruit and reward the best people, and ensure that there are incentives in place to encourage employees to be their best.

So this budget includes a proposal to provide state government with greater flexibility in hiring and managing personnel. In addition to a more efficient government, our goal is to achieve savings this year. If the revenue estimates in May are stronger, I would ask the General Assembly to reduce this saving target. We will work collaboratively with state employees to reduce personnel costs in a way that causes the least amount of disruption, avoids significant layoffs and honors the pay increases of the most recent contract. For my part, I am going to start by cutting my own pay by 5% this year.

The General Treasurer and I are working on another innovation — the Rhode Island Infrastructure Bank — to put Rhode Islanders back to work, improve our infrastructure, and reduce our demand for energy.

The bank will create a dependable source of capital to complete energy efficiency projects. We will integrate private capital into the mix of existing state funds to ramp up the deployment of clean energy technologies, while at the same time helping to create jobs.

This infrastructure bank — along with the school building authority and full funding for the municipal road and bridge revolving fund – will put people back to work and help our localities keep property taxes stable.

Despite all of our challenges, there’s a lot to love about Rhode Island. We love our neighborhoods, places to eat and shop. We love our beaches and our bay. For my family, a weekend in the summer is never complete without a visit to Sand Hill Cove.

We need more people to experience the things we all love. For too many years, though, we haven’t maximized the effectiveness in our state-funded tourism efforts. Rather than spending the resources in one concentrated way to maximize the bang for our buck, we’ve been sprinkling state-funded tourism dollars among various tourism bureaus around the state.

The time has come to redesign how we market our wonderful state to prospective visitors.

My proposal will restructure our tourism marketing efforts by concentrating resources behind a unified statewide tourism message. I realize that this proposal will cause some initial concern among the local bureaus, and that it is a change from the way we’ve always done it, but let’s work together over the coming months to find a solution. If we do this right, we can supercharge our tourism industry and create thousands of jobs just like other states have and that our families deserve.

The fiscally responsible budget I submit tonight takes a balanced approach to solving our challenges. We started with a nearly $200 million deficit, and we closed it by focusing mainly on spending cuts.

But, we also looked for ways to generate new revenue without imposing broad-based tax increases.

I propose closing a tax loophole on certain real estate transactions. This budget also asks those among us who are most able, to pay a little more. I propose asking those who have second homes worth more than $1 million to pay a modest assessment on those homes. This new revenue source, together with certain other revenue enhancements, is enabling us to invest in creating jobs.

We also have an opportunity now to take advantage of historically low interest rates to restructure some of our outstanding debt. By more actively managing our debt, something other states have done, we will be able to make important investments in job growth to jumpstart our economy.

The funds we will generate through refinancing will not be used to plug a budget hole, but will be part of a long-term plan to jumpstart economic growth and invest in specific economic development programs outlined in the budget.

I look forward to productive discussions and working together in the weeks to come. The truth is the people of Rhode Island are counting on us to because they are struggling and are losing faith in government. They want us to work together and make the right decisions to put Rhode Island on a better path.

I know all of us here tonight are aware of these challenges and want to rise to the occasion. I am asking you to.

Be a part of the team that sparks Rhode Island’s economic comeback. Be a part of the team that restores people’s faith in government by showing that we can get things done. Be a part of the team that restores optimism and confidence in our future. This budget sets forth a path to a Rhode Island full of opportunity, where everyone who works hard has a chance. Now, I know we have a high hill to climb, but let’s start now, and climb it together.

 

Thank you.

Mattiello’s ‘dynamic analysis’ is long discredited economics


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

MattielloSpeaker of the House Nicholas Mattiello has been making statements demonstrating his support for “dynamic analysis,” (also known as “dynamic scoring“) a fiscally irresponsible and economically discredited accounting trick supported nationally by congressional Republicans that amounts to little more than rebranded trickle-down economics.

At Saturday’s 2015 Small Business Summit, held at Bryant University, Mattiello defended the $20 million tax break on social security income he’s proposed as a short term economic hit for long term economic gain.

“What I’ve been saying lately,” says Mattiello in the clip below, “is that everything we look at in state government, we look at the wrong way. We look at it from a very static point of view. ‘What is it going to cost us?’ ‘Oh, this year it’s going to cost us $20 million so forget it, we’re not going to do it. If we don’t have room in the budget to do it we’ll kick that issue out. Well, we have a structural deficit in Rhode Island, folks, so under that analysis we’re never going to do anything in Rhode Island to make our economy better. Sometimes you have to prioritize and you have to do what the economy needs to do to move forward.”

Then, in today’s GoLocalProv, Mattiello said, “I know that keeping people in Rhode Island, with more discretionary income in their pockets, will be a significant long-term gain for our economy.  This initiative comes with a short-term cost in our state budget.  But, we need to start using a more dynamic analysis that takes into consideration long-term benefits, instead of a static analysis that only looks at how much things cost.”

Mattiello has invested a lot of political capital to pass his signature tax break. And to make these tax breaks work, he’s going to cut the state budget accordingly. The cuts are most likely to be in the areas of social services, which the Speaker has repeatedly signaled his willingness to cut. But in order to pass his tax break, the Speaker needs an economic analysis friendly to his idea. Conventional, or what is known as static analysis, does not look kindly on Mattiello’s idea, but dynamic analysis does.

The economic analysis Mattiello wants to use here in Rhode Island is the same as what is being proposed nationally by the Republicans now in control of Congress, and it’s scarily reminiscent of the policies Kansas Governor Sam Brownback instituted in 2012 that eviscerated the economy of that state.

Congressman Chris Van Hollen of Maryland and Congresswoman Louise Slaughter of New York penned a piece criticizing dynamic analysis, writing that Republicans “are rigging the rules in favor of windfall tax breaks to the very wealthy and big corporations who can hire high-priced, well-funded lobbyists—once again choosing to leave behind working families. Their plan would further distort the nation’s fiscal outlook by applying this scoring model only to tax cuts—not the economic impact of investments in education, healthcare, infrastructure, and other areas. That means that the value of tax cuts to the economy would be exaggerated, and the value of investments in the middle class would be undercut.”

Shaun Donovan, Director of the Office of Management and Budget at the White House, outlines three reasons why dynamic analysis is little more than a ruse and it’s worth quoting from at length.

First, dynamic scoring requires CBO and JCT to make assumptions in areas with unusually great uncertainty. While all budget estimates are uncertain, there is substantially more disagreement among economists and experts about how policy changes affect the macroeconomy than about most other scoring issues. This helps explain why estimates from different CBO models of the long-run growth effects of a 10 percent tax cut differed by a factor of 15 – and ranged from positive to negative – when dynamic scoring was used.

“Second, and more fundamentally, dynamic scoring would require CBO and JCT to make assumptions about policies that go beyond the scope of the legislation itself. For example, when a tax cut or spending increase is deficit financed, its long-term effect on the economy depends heavily on how and when its costs are ultimately recouped – whether through higher taxes or lower spending, and after how large an increase in debt. When the legislation itself is silent on these questions, Congressional scorekeepers would have to make an assumption – potentially putting scorekeepers in the game, rather than just referees. Moreover, in standard models, these assumptions are often the difference between a positive or negative effect on the economy.

“Finally, dynamic scoring can create a bias favoring tax cuts over investments in infrastructure, education, and other priorities. While the House rule would require dynamic scoring for legislation making large changes in revenues and/or mandatory spending, and makes it permissible at the option of leadership for any such legislation (even if modest), it would not apply to discretionary spending, ignoring potential growth effects of investments in research, education, and infrastructure. More insidious, economic models that find large growth effects of tax cuts are often based on the assumption that they would be paid for entirely through reduced spending – without taking into account at all the economic consequences the reduction in government investment.”

Speaker Mattiello seems intent on implementing the kind of economic policy here in Rhode Island that has long benefited the rich and connected over the middle class and the poor. These policies have led to massive wealth acquisition by the very few amid crushing poverty for many. In doing so Mattiello has aligned himself with the Republican Party and against the Democratic Party of which he claims to be a member.

Patreon

Video from the 7th Annual RI Interfaith Coalition to Reduce Poverty Vigil


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_9483As they have for the past six years, about four dozen clergy representing a wide variety of faith traditions gathered at Gloria Dei Lutheran Church on Wednesday, put on their vestments and robes, and marched to the State House for the Rhode Island Interfaith Coalition to Reduce Poverty Vigil. The purpose of the vigil is to “ask our elected officials to govern with wisdom and compassion, state our commitment that everyone in Rhode Island must have their basic needs met and offer the support of the Interfaith Community” towards achieving the goal of cutting “Rhode Island poverty in half by 2020.”

Governor Gina Raimondo, Senate President M. Teresa Paiva-Weed and Speaker of the House Nicholas Mattiello accepted the traditional invitation to speak at the vigil. They were introduced by Maxine Richman, Board Member of the Jewish Council of Public Affairs and co-chair of the Interfaith Coalition. Richman was direct with the public officials in her opening remarks, asking, “How can it be that Rhode Island, with a very large service sector and struggling middle class, has only a 10% earned income tax credit while our neighbors in Massachusetts earned income tax credit is 15% and Connecticut’s is 20%? And how can it be that 1,3000 people are on a waiting list for foundational workforce programs?”

After the politicians spoke Bishop W. Nicholas Knisely of the Episcopal Diocese of Rhode Island addressed the issues confronting the poor from a Christian point of view. Knisely quoted the New Testament in which Jesus said, “the poor you will always have with you” to point out the continuing need for a robust social safety net.

The event concluded with the reading of the names of all state wide public office holders, all the members of the General Assembly and several prominent mayors. Very few elected officials attended the event.

The coalition is part of a national movement that includes the Jewish Council of Public Affairs, (JCPA) National Council of Churches, and Catholic Charities, as well as more than 40 other faith organizations.

Patreon

FBI or ransomware? You be the judge


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_9419 MacBethLost in the aftermath of the budget was this gem (start at around 2:54; for fun, pay attention to Reps. Shekarchi and Morin reactions) from last Friday’s House debate over Budget Article 1. In it, Rep. Karen MacBeth claims that the FBI temporarily seized control of her home computer for reasons unknown.

Now, I’m not a seasoned law enforcement professional, but given a lot of ink has been spilled over the ability of government to monitor Internet activity without much oversight, it seemed suspicious that the FBI would notify someone if they were hacking a computer. It seems to me that if you’re looking for documentation of wrongdoing, you’d get a warrant or request it from a possibly cooperative source like MacBeth. And if you didn’t want MacBeth or anyone to know, you’d get permission to do it secretly.

So I did what I usually do in cases like this, I searched “the FBI has taken over my computer” online. And I found this little piece of malware (more specifically, ransomware) known as “Reveton” or “the Moneypak Virus” from a number of articles from one to two years ago. Basically, it’s something you accidentally download from either a bad website or email and then locks your computer until you pay. The ransomware poses as the FBI, or if you’re in another country, that nation’s police or cybersecurity force. The genuine FBI has been warning people about this virus for a while.

Now, the details of Rep. MacBeth’s encounter with someone claiming to be the FBI hacking her computer doesn’t quite match up with what’s described in the above links, and from her summation of the events, we don’t get a detailed picture of what happened. Perhaps it really was the FBI. Or perhaps, (and in my view, more likely) this was an iteration of the older piece of malware; since it’s shown to be pretty adaptable.

If it’s the latter, I hope the Speaker asks himself why he made her House Oversight Chair. Frankly, I’d look for a healthy level of skepticism on the part of the Oversight Committee Chair.

P.S. A number of articles note that this virus could be stopped by having up-to-date antivirus software. If you’re a cheapskate like me, there are plenty of free alternatives. And yes, Mac users, that means you too! You get viruses as well, so protect yourself before you wreck yourself.

Hotel workers plan week long hunger strike for $15 minimum wage


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
DSC_9660
Mirjaam Parada, hunger striker

The Rhode Island House, under the leadership of Speaker Nicholas Mattiello, moved to strip away the political power of Providence hotel workers by inserting a provision in the state budget that would prevent municipalities from setting their own minimum wage last Thursday night. This week, the Rhode Island Senate takes up discussion of the budget, and though Senate President M. Teresa Paiva-Weed might wish to continue to ignore the demands of underpaid and overworked hotel workers, it will be hard to do so as five women engage in a hunger strike at the State House in protest.

DSC_9645
Jenna Karlin, Unite Here!

Starting Thursday, five women, including four hotel workers and Central Falls City Councillor Shelby Maldonado, will be camping out 24 hours a day at the State House, refusing any sustenance except water to call attention to the terrible way in which this year’s budget specifically targets low wage workers with the intent of politically silencing their voices. The plan is to strike until Governor Chafee makes his final decision on the budget, which will be a week from Thursday, if past experience is any indicator.

At a press conference Monday afternoon, Unite Here!’s Jenna Karlin talked about how finding volunteers for the hunger strike was not a problem. The problem was settling on only five people to participate, there were so many eager to step up for the cause.

DSC_9658
Evan McLaughlin, hotel worker

Mirjaam Parada is one of the hunger strikers. Parada works at the Omni Hotel and presently makes a comfortable wage in excess of $15, but she is participating in the strike out of solidarity with the workers at the Renaissance and the Hilton, who make far less than she does, and struggle every day to make ends meet.

Hotel worker Evan McLaughlin, who will not be participating in the hunger strike, wants everyone who walks into the State House over the next week to understand that the women not eating outside the the building are doing so because the General Assembly has decided that they do not have the right to petition their city government or fellow voters for fair wages under the new law.

DSC_9677
City Councillor Shelby Maldonado

This change in the law targets the Providence hotel workers, but the effect will be state wide. All 39 town and city councils in the state will lose the ability to determine a key aspect of their economy under the new budget. This is in some ways an end run around democracy itself: The Providence City Council put the measure to give hotel workers $15 an hour on November’s ballot for the voters of Providence to decide. The law championed by Mattiello’s House takes away the power of voters. It seems “big government” is only a problem when it affects a business trying to turn a profit and not when it affects a family trying to eat.

Central Falls Councillor (and union rep) Shelby Maldonado will also be participating in the hunger strike. Maldonado wants to best represent the people who elected her, and she feels she can best do this by championing the democratic process. The rights of the people to determine what is best for their communities is being usurped by a General Assembly that is beholden only to business interests at the expense of low wage workers, and this situation has to stop.

Earlier this year, Senate President M Teresa Paiva-Weed participated in a vigil in the main rotunda of the State House and spoke about this issue of poverty, and her responsibility as a legislator to address this problem.

“The Senate’s focus this session on the economy will be inextricably intertwined with the causes of poverty. We can’t move the economy forward without addressing the very issues that underline poverty.”

She said the vigil and a screening later in the day of [the movie] Inequality For All “will set a tone for the year and the message will be carried with us as we work to meet the significant challenges ahead.”

Even though it seems these words were forgotten by the Senate president moments after leaving her lips, one hopes that Paiva-Weed understands that how we treat our most vulnerable citizens best demonstrates our commitment to our moral responsibilities.

DSC_9621Ironically, just before the hotel workers took to the State House rotunda to talk about their planned hunger strike, there was an event in the Bell Room on the first floor of the State House to celebrate the release of a new cookbook, Extraordinary Recipes from Providence & Rhode Island Chef’s Table by Linda Beaulieu, complete with expertly prepared foods from some of the area’s best chefs. This juxtaposition of fancy food for the entitled political class and a hunger strike by poorly paid workers is a jarring reminder that things are not going right in Rhode Island.

Here’s the press conference video:

Budget bill is big on corporate welfare, short on renter protections


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Group bannerCrying the need to ease the burdens of doing business in Rhode Island, the House of Representatives recently passed a budget that lowers the corporate tax rate, raises the ceiling on the estate tax, pays millions to 38 Studios bond investors, raises the gas tax and the cost of a car inspection. One has to wonder how these easements will truly help businesses in Rhode Island, or lure others here, when the state’s consumers are forced deeper into poverty.

Along with raising the costs of living and depleting our tax revenue, the House, led by new Speaker Nicholas Mattiello, may literally enable the eviction of hundreds of Rhode Island’s renters by shelving important legislation.

Just Cause (H7449 and S2659), is a bill that would prevent the no-fault eviction of tenants whose landlords get foreclosed on by the bank. As housing costs rise, homeownership remains what it has always been – the American “dream,” never reality – unemployment refuses to abate, and banks continue to foreclose on homes, the threat of no-fault eviction looms over many Rhode Island families.

“Just Cause,” the informal title of the bill, refers to the state’s Landlord-Tenant Act, which describes “just causes” for eviction. The list does not include foreclosure. However, throughout the housing crisis banks have used foreclosure as a justification to evict hundreds of families from their apartments. The rationale for this, they allege, is that homes are easier to sell without occupants. One has to wonder at this claim, when a simple drive down through many parts of the state includes the shells of abandoned, vandalized, and near-worthless homes, owned by banks that foreclosed and evicted the residents. These homes are not easy to sell. In fact, the only people who will buy them are out of state investors, slumlords looking to mooch rent from Rhode Island families in exchange for criminal living conditions, and house flippers, who profit from crisis by buying cheap properties.

According to The National Low Income Housing Coalition, housing costs are already out of reach for many Rhode Island renters. In order to afford the fair market rent for a 2-bedroom apartment ($928 a month), a renter making the average wage ($11.92 an hour), would have to work 60 hours a week, 52 weeks a year. There aren’t a lot of people I know making the “average wage,” which must factor in wages lower and much higher than 12 bucks an hour. With the minimum wage at 8.oo dollars an hour, one has to wonder how many working Rhode Islanders pay their rent. Add to this the 1,468 foreclosure deeds filed in 2013 and you have a rental crisis, as tenants evicted because of foreclosure drive up the demand on scarce and unaffordable rentals. In addition, those vacant, foreclosed properties stand empty, occasionally burning down, dragging down surrounding property values and further exacerbating the homeless and housing issues of our state.

No fault evictions due to foreclosure are increasing homelessness, reducing the availability of homes, pushing up rents, and fueling a housing crisis. It’s immoral and bad for the economy to allow banks to put families out, especially when they’ve done nothing wrong and are able to pay rent. Why would Speaker Mattiello, the primary opponent of the legislation, prefer a vacant home, homeless family, and devastated neighborhoods to a property occupied by tenants who pay rent and maintain the building? Even while the Senate leadership, through the efforts Senator Harold Metts, shepherds the bill towards passage, Speaker Mattiello remains adamantly in support of an international banking industry in opposition to the state’s people and economy.

It’s time to question the ideology that subsidies for the rich and corporations produce economic prosperity. It’s time for the state’s government to utilize regulations like Just Cause to bolster a struggling economy (at no cost to the state!), and protect the interests of the majority of the state’s people.

It’s time for Speaker Mattiello to reconsider the cost of shelving this legislation.

The 5 worst things in the House budget


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

RI State House 5The Rhode Island House of Representatives has put together a new budget, and there is a lot not to like.  Here are my top five:

5.   Slashing the corporate income tax from 9% to 7%.

New House Speaker Mattiello, a very conservative Democrat from Cranston, has been championing this idea ever since he rose to power.  Naturally, progressives would prefer to see these funds spent on jobs programs like infrastructure spending.  But what is perhaps most disappointing about this cut is how it hands a big break to the businesses that least need the help, not the ones that need it most.  At the federal level, we have a progressive corporate income tax, so businesses with smaller profits pay a lower rate, which helps increase competition.   But in Rhode Island, every business pays the same rate, regardless of the size of the profits.  We could change that.  We could also eliminate the $500 minimum tax, which unfairly discriminates against small, struggling businesses.  If we are going to go down the unwise road of cutting corporate income taxes, instead of spending that money on jobs, helping out small businesses would be a better way to go.

4.   Slashing the estate tax.

In Capital and the Twenty-First Century, one of the most exciting works of economic research in recent years, Thomas Piketty lays out a bleak picture of accelerating wealth inequality increasingly dominated, not by earned wealth, but by inherited wealth–a threat that strikes at the core of the American Dream.  It is not an understatement to say that this thesis has revolutionized the way the national Democratic Party looks at inequality.  Now, more than ever, the party is committed to addressing wealth inequality.  Yet in Rhode Island, where the Democratic leadership of the General Assembly tends to side with the national Republican Party on issues, we are moving in the other direction and slashing our state’s estate tax, which disproportionately affects the wealthy.

3.   Refusing to fund negotiated raises.

Former Speaker Gordon Fox was no friend to working people, but new Speaker Nick Mattiello is striking an even more aggressively anti-labor profile.  Although the Governor negotiated a modest $25 million in raises for state workers, Mattiello’s budget brazenly refuses to fund them.  The precedent this sets is chilling.

2.   Raising taxes on the poor and the middle class.

Instead of one big tax hike on working people, like the proposed Sakonnet River Bridge tolls, the Mattiello budget opts for a range of regressive tax hikes.*  The gas tax, which is very regressive, is going up.  So are the vehicle inspection fee and the good driving fee.  The property tax circuit-breaker relief program, which helps low-income Rhode Islanders, will be axed.  Repealing the 2006 income tax cuts for the rich, naturally, was off the table.

1.   Banning minimum wage increases in any city or town.

Borrowing an idea from Oklahoma’s Tea Party government, the House Democratic leadership is banning cities and towns from raising the minimum wage.  This is a not so subtle attempt to block the inspiring campaign fighting for a living wage for hotel workers in Providence.

*It is an interesting question whether these new tax hikes are more damaging than the tolls.  While they are probably more regressive, they are also probably more effective at driving environmentally and socially responsible transportation usage.

Real estate transfer tax will help get homeless off the streets


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
A camp on the banks of the Providence River (Photo by Bob Plain)
A camp on the banks of the Providence River (Photo by Bob Plain)

A proposed increase to the real estate transfer fee is good news for the homeless in Rhode Island. That’s because the new revenue will benefit a rental voucher program that helps keep people off the streets.

“We are thrilled that the House Finance Committee ensured that this year’s budget invests in the long-term solutions to addressing homelessness and the lack of affordable housing in our state,” said Jim Ryczek, executive director of the Rhode Island Coalition for the Homeless. “Through a very modest increase to the fee paid in real estate transactions, the state is creating an ongoing, dedicated funding stream to fund the housing rental subsidy program and homeless prevention assistance and housing retention assistance programs.”

The real estate transfer fee is increasing from  $2 per $500 of real estate to $2.30 per $500, said House spokesman Larry Berman, with new revenue going to benefit lead paint abatement programs, “shelter operations” and the rental voucher program. (Real estate sold for $200,000 owes $800 in fees currently, under the proposed structure it would owe $920)

Here’s the section from the House Finance Committee’s budget overview (section 28, p. 18):

The House Finance Committee recommends increasing the real estate conveyance tax from $2.00 to $2.30 per $500 or fractional part is paid for the purchase of property conveyed for more than $100. This is estimated to generate an additional $2.8 million. These funds will be used for the lead hazard reduction abatement program, shelter operations and rental housing subsidies, which are administered by the Housing Resources Commission. The recommended budget includes $2.5 million from general revenues for these expenses. The House Finance Committee includes $2.8 million from new receipts, to offset the loss of general revenues. This provides an overall increase of $0.3 million.

“The Massachusetts tax is $2.26 per $500, so Rhode Island will be only 4 cents higher,” said Berman. “But in Massachusetts,  local communities are allowed to add on their own tax. For example the Martha’s Vineyard Land Trust has a tax on all the towns on the Vineyard. The Governor cut these two programs in his budget, so the Assembly is restoring them with this tax, which will then be dedicated to these programs so they will not be cut in the future.”

Added Ryczek: “This funding model builds on last year’s budget that funded rental vouchers for Rhode Islanders experiencing homelessness, and more importantly, it ensures that the state is investing in a long-term, strategic and proven approach to solving the homeless problem in our state. More than 125 Rhode Islanders will move from homelessness to stable housing because of the leadership by the General Assembly in last year’s legislative session. It is encouraging that House Finance is continuing its commitment to our most vulnerable Rhode Islanders experiencing homelessness and housing insecurity.”

Low income RIers pay for estate tax exemption


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The budget as proposed benefits wealthy heirs at the expense of low-income Rhode Islanders, according to an Economic Progress Institute analysis of the House Finance Committee’s revenue and spending plan released late last week.

The proposed budget would increase the exemption on the estate tax from $921,655 to $1.5 million while eliminating $3.9 million in tax breaks to low and moderate income Rhode Islanders. The budget lowers the Earned Income Tax Credit and eliminates a property tax refund.

“The clear winners are a small number of wealthy taxpayers whose estates will pay less in taxes and in many cases, nothing at all starting next year,” according to this factsheet put together by EPI. “The clear losers are tens of thousands of low- and modest-income Rhode Islanders who will pay more in taxes next year. Unemployed homeowners and renters are among the biggest losers, because they will no longer qualify for property tax assistance and are not eligible for the earned income tax credit. Many of the lowest-wage workers will also be negatively impacted by the loss of the property tax refund, even with an eventual boost in the EITC.”

According to EPI, if you are a Rhode Island taxpayer who dies with a million dollars, your heirs will owe $30,555 of their inheritance to the state. The proposed budget would eliminate the estate tax for everyone who dies with less than $2 million. Those heirs would owe $35,200.

epi estate tax

On the other hand, the proposed budget would reduce the Earned Income Tax Credit overall. According to EPI: “Lawmakers are reforming the credit by reducing it to equal 10 percent of the federal EITC and making it fully refundable. This change is likely to result in larger refunds for some of the lowest-wage workers in our state, and some workers who did not receive a refund will now get to keep more of what they earn come tax time. Still, many modest-income EITC filers with relatively higher income tax liability will pay more in taxes as the credit is reduced.”

The budget plan also eliminates what is known as the “property tax circuit breaker.” This tax refund is for Rhode Islanders who earn less than $30,000 a year whose property tax rate is more than 3 percent of their household income.  40,000 renters and homeowners took advantage of this deduction last year for an average refund of $272, according to EPI.

“The $4 million being taken directly out of the pockets of low- income taxpayers is money that would have been spent right here in the Ocean State at local businesses,” said EPI Executive Director Kate Brewster. “On the other hand, high-income households don’t need to spend every dollar they have to meet their basic needs and are more likely to save their tax cut.”

Nick Mattiello cowers to corporate interests


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The article, House speaker outlines state’s economic priorities, in the Providence Journal started badly. Paul Grimaldi wrote,

“The newly elected speaker of the house told a roomful of business people Thursday that fixing the state’s fiscal problems is his priority.”

mattiello2I didn’t vote for Mattiello for speaker, nor did you. He was “elected” by a bunch of frightened representatives after just a few days of discussion. There was no political campaign, no public discussion. Yet he’s the “elected speaker”?

And he’s talking to a group of “business people” at a Chamber of Commerce breakfast in the Kirkbrae Country Club. He’s reassuring them. Why? Because he’s counting on their contributions to his campaign and any political action groups he might be setting up in the wake of Gordon Fox’s resignation.

In the article, Mattiello says that 38 Studios was one of the biggest debacles in the country’s history.” Really? Did he miss the Real Estate Bubble? The Dot.Com implosion? Stock Market Crash of 1929? Teapot Dome? 38 Studios has been and remains a huge sucking chest wound in Rhode Island’s economy, but it’s not the worst thing that’s ever happened in the US, not even in the state. Remember the Credit Union crisis?

But, having recently returned from a visit to the Bond Rating Folk in New York, Mattiello claims that we have no choice but to repay our “Moral Obligation.”

Let me reframe that little trip as a school yard scene…

Roger the Rocket wants a new video game! He doesn’t have enough money to buy the game, and Wally the Banker won’t lend him the money. But Little Rhody, who wants to be Roger’s friend, and thinks he’ll be able to play the game too, promises to pay Wally the Banker back if Wally will lend Roger the Rocket the money.

Wally loans Roger the money. Roger loses it on his way to the store. Roger can’t pay, but Wally says that Little Rhody has to pay.

Little Rhody doesn’t know what to do. Rhody didn’t have the money either! So Rhody goes to Wally the Banker’s friend, Bondy, who gives out grades of A, B and Junk, and ask them for advice. 

What do you think Bondy told Little Rhody to do?

Juvenile? Yes. Simplistic. Yes. Realistic? Startlingly so.

But the bad news is that the article keeps getting worse. Mattiello is telling these business people everything they want to hear. He’s going to lower corporate taxes. He’s going to raise the estate tax threshold.

One proposed bill, whose “nuances” he refused to discuss, would shift the way corporations taxes are assessed, from property, payroll and sales to just sales. In theory, this would increase revenue (presumably because they’d increase the taxes on corporate sales?), but in reality it looks like another big tax break for CVS. Think about it. What’s the biggest corporation in this state with the most employees and the most property?

Poor Little Rhody doesn’t know what to do. The rich kids all have so much money. Rhody wants to play in their playground. Maybe if Rhody will do whatever the rich kids say, then Rhody will be popular and have money too!

What do you think Rhody will do?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387