Bob Plain is the editor/publisher of Rhode Island's Future. Previously, he's worked as a reporter for several different news organizations both in Rhode Island and across the country.

6 responses to “Progress Report: Engage RI, Labor Make Pensions Election Issue; The Paul Ryan, Todd Akin Connection; Generosity”

  1. PinkHatLib

    “How about an aquarium?”

    How about a scrapyard or maybe some oil tanks? Or are you anti-union?!

    (Sorry, forgot that line only applies to those of us who live in the working-class neighborhoods.)

    VN:R_U [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. DogDiesel

    ” How about an aquarium?”
     
    Owned by whom? Given the plight of the city, wouldn’t it be better to get that property on the tax rolls?

    VN:R_U [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. Cheryl Foster

    Kudos to Professor Jessica Sherwood for her characteristically prescient read on social exclusivity  – and institutional exclusion. Johnson and Wales students will be lucky to have her as she joins their faculty in a new position this fall, and we in Rhode Island should be grateful that her success in landing a full time gig in academia allows her to remain in state.

    VN:R_U [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  4. Alias Smith

    I remember that an aquarium was the centerpiece of Republican Victor Moffitt’s (remember him?) gubernatorial campaign to revitalize the RI economy. However, I’m not sure that it’s very realistic. Aquariums are very expensive to build and maintain. It would also have to compete with nearby Mystic and Boston. 

    Maybe we could give Curt Schilling a few hundred million to head up that project, too? 

    VN:R_U [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  5. RI Progressive

    Oh, if only Gov. Carcieri was still around.  Remember the fantastic job he did with the economy…?  No? Yeah, neither do I.

    VN:R_U [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  6. Sully

    The Charity report is bunk. It excludes donations from people who don’t itemize their tax deductions and does not include people who donate time, which I think is much more charitable than cutting a check. Wolfe’s statement that “people in less religious states are giving in a different way by being more willing to pay higher taxes so the government can equitably distribute superior benefits” is simply conjecture – he has no basis for that statement. While I have heard people looking to raise taxes on others – which I would hardly consider being charitable, I have yet to see a significant percentage of people oppose a decrease of their own taxes. Are there a lot of middle class taxpayers who were disappointed about recent extension of their tax cut?

    People don’t choose to be religious so they can donate time and money, and people don’t choose to not be religious because they don’t care about others. My guess is that charitable giving by the religious and not religious is probably similar, they just give in different ways.
     

    VN:R_U [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.