Senator Whitehouse is fighting ‘dark money’ in Washington


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2016-09-06 Dark Money 006Saying that fighting dark money in politics is his “patriotic duty,” Senator Sheldon Whitehouse sat next to Congressmembers David Cicilline and James Langevin in a “roundtable discussion” to highlight his work on the DISCLOSE Act, introduced by the Senator in June, which would “require disclosure of donations greater than $10,000 to organizations spending at least $10,000 in an election.”

“The American people want and deserve accountability in their elections,” said Whitehouse, “Unchecked secret corporate spending has tipped the scales of power away from ordinary Americans and in favor of big special interests. If Congress is going to make meaningful progress in the months and years ahead on important issues that matter to Rhode Islanders like addressing climate change, reforming our broken campaign finance system is the first step.”

Whitehouse’s DISCLOSE Act, which has been supported by Langevin and Cicilline in the U.S. House of Representatives, is part of the “We the People” legislative package to deal with secret corporate political spending, lobbyist influence, the revolving door, and other facets of the campaign finance system. Whitehouse touted the suite of legislation as a solution to the corporate spending blocking meaningful legislative action on issues like ensuring economic security for the middle class and addressing climate change.

It seems that Whitehouse mentioned climate change and chose Save the Bay’s headquarters in Providence as the location of his round table discussion because, as the Senator said in response to Meghan Kallman, chair of the RI Sierra Club, “I think it’s pretty safe to say, that at a national level, the climate battle is the campaign finance battle. They’re totally married together into one thing.”

2016-09-06 Dark Money 003Notably, there were protesters outside Save the Bay holding signs reminding their elected representatives about both Invenergy’s proposed $700 million fracked gas and diesel oil burning power plant and National Grid’s proposed LNG liquefaction facility for Fields Point in the Port of Providence, a stone’s throw away. They were there to remind elected officials that their jobs in Washington do not absolve them from taking positions on local issues. None of the elected leaders in the room, aside from State Senator Juan Pichardo, who has publicly taken a stand against the LNG plant in Providence, have thrown their considerable political weight behind the opposition to these projects.

“This is a national package, [but] many many many issues are local,” said Kallman, “We’re watching Dakota. We’re watching Burrillville. We’re watching Fields Point… We have something of a disconnect between what’s happening on the national level and where the front line battles are being fought.”

2016-09-06 Dark Money 004The influence of corporate spending on elections since the 2010 Citizens United decision by the Supreme Court is a major concern to all who attended the event. Citizens United unleashed a previously restricted torrent of special interest money into the political system.  More than $1.5 billion in unlimited contributions, including more than $500 million in secret contributions, have been poured into federal elections since the decision was issued.

“It didn’t take long after Citizens United for secret money has find its way to the shores of Rhode Island,” said John Marion, Executive Director of Common Cause Rhode Island. “We know that Rhode Islanders don’t want unlimited undisclosed money in our elections. We are fortunate to have a congressional delegation that has taken this issue seriously and has offered real solutions for the problems posed by big money in our politics.”

“Senator Whitehouse is a national leader fighting to make our elections and government work for everyday people again through the We the People Act,” said Aquene Freechild, campaign co-director of Public Citizen‘s Democracy Is For People Campaign. “He’s pushing the current congressional majority to snap out of their campaign cash-induced paralysis and stand up to the tiny but influential donor class: by overturning Citizens United, disclosing all spending in elections, and slamming shut the revolving door that transforms public servants into corporate shills.”

Also in attendance at the roundtable discussion were RI Secretary of State Nellie Gorbea, RI State Representative Art Handy, state director of Clean Water Action Jonathan Berard, Save the Bay’s Topher Hamblett and Dean Michael J. Yelnosky of the Roger Williams University School of Law. You can watch the rest of the video from the event below.

2016-09-06 Dark Money 0052016-09-06 Dark Money 001

Patreon

Keable’s Burrillville power plant bill passes out of House committee


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Art HandyRepresentative Cale Keable‘s bill to change the make-up of the Energy Facilities Siting Board and give the voters of Burrillville the ability to vote on any tax treaties their town council may enter to with companies interested in building a power plant in their town passed out of committee today on an 11 to 2 vote. Only Representatives Ray Hull and Michael Marcello voted against the bill, heard in the House Committee on Environment and Natural Resources, chaired by Representative Art Handy.

The bill now moves to a full House vote, possibly as early as Thursday.

Rep Marcello was one of two representatives to attend the Northern Rhode Island Chamber of Commerce’s Eggs & Issues Breakfast Thursday morning where Invenergy‘s director of development John Niland was the guest speaker.

The bill, if it becomes law, will allow voters in Burrillville the ability to check the power of their Town Council, which has the authority to set the rate of taxes to be paid by Invenergy, which has proposed a fracked gas and diesel oil burning power plant for that town.

The bill, H8240a, is a modified from the version heard in committee last week. The main change is that the number of EFSB members is to be seven, not nine as originally proposed. The original bill included the chairperson of the Commerce Corporation and the director of the RI League of Cities and Towns as board members. These have been removed.

The original bill scheduled the vote on the tax agreement during the next general election. The new bill allows for special elections, to be paid for at the applicant’s expense. Near the end of the bill a section was added, at the behest of National Grid, that would exempt any transmission line project that was filed with the Energy Facility Siting Board prior to June 1, 2016.

The bill now heads to the House for a full vote by the chamber.

Meanwhile, the fate of the Senate bill, S3037, which has been referred to Senate Judiciary, is unknown. The bill awaits being heard in committee and time is running out in this session to pass the bill. The bill was introduced by Senator Paul Fogarty.

Patreon

Legislative races to watch


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
The State House in November.
The State House in November.

Progressives already lost Providence legislator Maria Cimini this election season, but we’ve also picked up Lauren Carson down in Newport. Here are some of the races where the liberal left could pick up – or lose – legislative seats.

In Portsmouth/Middletown, Rep. Linda Finn is in a dog fight with young Republican Dan Reilly, whom she beat two years ago to first win the seat. Finn says Reilly has been claiming credit for legislation he didn’t author, and telling other tall tales on the trail.

Also on Aquidneck Island, Senate President Teresa Paiva Weed, who has the support of the Sierra Club, also has a challenge from Republican Mike Smith.

In Narragansett/Wakefield Rep. Teresa Tanzi‘s opponent Steve Tetzner, an NRA-supporting mortgage broker, spent more than $100,000 on his campaign touting fiscal conservancy.

On the East Side of Providence, Aaron Regunberg already passed one big test by beat Heather Tow Yick in the primary, but he still needs to fend off Ethan Gyles, who is running as an independent. Whomever wins will be replacing former House Speaker Gordon Fox.

In Coventry, Margaux Morrisseau is hoping to win the senate seat currently held by Nick Kettle, who is best known for fake Facebook pages and disparaging homeless people. Morisseau runs the New Leaders Council, a training program for progressive activists, and for leading the fight for payday loan reform. And on the House side in Coventry Nick Denice hopes to unseat Republican Patricia Morgan.

Nearby in West Warwick, Senator Adam Satchel, a teacher and a Democrat, is defending his seat against independent Michael Pinga.

In North Kingstown, self-described conservative Democrat Julie Casimiro, a charter school supporter, is challenging tea party favorite Doreen Costa, who has the backing of the local fire fighters union in the race. The GOP could also pick up a seat if Republican Sharon Gamba beats conservative Democrat Bob Craven for a House seat.

Central Falls City Councilor Shelby Maldonado hopes to beat independent Albert Romanowicz and Dan Bidondi is running again Senator Elizabeth Crowley.

In Richmond, Rep. Larry Valencia is running against Republican Justin Price. In Cranston Rep. Art Handy is running against Republican Don Gendron.

One would think Rep. Mike Marcello would have a race on his hands, after making an unsuccessful run at being speaker of the House. He’s running against Lillian Jean Delmonico and Robert Quattrocchi.

Many urban progressives have already effectively won their races because they are unopposed, including Edith Ajello, Chris Blazejewski, Juan Pichardo, Gayle Goldin, Josh Miller of Cranston and Dave Bennett of Warwick.

What other races should I be watching?

PVD City Council backs Rep Handy’s climate change bill


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

art handy memeThe Providence City Council wants the state of Rhode Island to address climate change.

At its meeting on Thursday the Council unanimously endorsed a resolution calling upon the General Assembly to pass Rep. Art Handy’s (D-Cranston) climate change bill, known as the Resilient Rhode Island legislation. (Listen to a podcast with Rep. Handy about his bill here)

The Providence resolution about the bill was put forward by Council Majority Leader Seth Yurdin.

“Climate change is the biggest challenge that we face in our time,” he said in a press release. “As a coastal community, Rhode Island is especially susceptible to the dangerous effects of climate change, such as rising sea levels, coastal erosion, and flooding. As elected officials, we have a moral obligation to do all we can to combat climate change.”

Art Handy explains his ‘Resilient RI’ bill


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

art handy memeCranston Rep. Art Handy assures me his Resilient RI bill, which would focus the state’s efforts on addressing climate change, won’t require anyone to become a vegan/pedestrian.

“It would probably be helpful,” he joked at the end of a 15 minute interview. “But I’m not proposing it.”

Instead, his bill will help organize the actions the state is already taking. “There’s actually a lot happening,” Handy said. “It’s just not very coordinated across state agencies”

The bill would also create a science advisory group to suggest other solutions and set an “aspirational goal” of 80 percent reduction in carbon emissions by 2050. In the short term, he says, addressing climate change could serve as an economic driver in the Ocean State.

He said technology to address and adapt to sea level rise could be developed here. “Maybe 3M develops a site here to test things and [partners with] the war college and the university,” he said. “Like many times you have no idea what the technology is going to be in five or 10 years but we want to be the place where it is being developed.”

You can listen to our full conversation below. Abel Collins wrote this post about Handy’s bill. And Resilient RI has its own website here.

Mass, Conn have already acted; is RI finally ready to tackle climate change?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

art handy memeThe newest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report was released today, and it isn’t pretty.

The Guardian summarized it well, saying

“The report from the UN’s intergovernmental panel on climate change concluded that climate change was already having effects in real time – melting sea ice and thawing permafrost in the Arctic, killing off coral reefs in the oceans, and leading to heat waves, heavy rains and mega-disasters.

And the worst was yet to come. Climate change posed a threat to global food stocks, and to human security, the blockbuster report said.

‘Nobody on this planet is going to be untouched by the impacts of climate change,’ said Rajendra Pachauri, chair of the IPCC.

Monday’s report was the most sobering so far from the UN climate panel and, scientists said, the most definitive. The report – a three year joint effort by more than 300 scientists – grew to 2,600 pages and 32 volumes.”

The bottom line is that nowhere near enough action has been taken to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions, and the urgency to do something increases with each passing day. Rhode Island can be considered among those that have failed to act, but that could change this year.

While Massachusetts and Connecticut passed comprehensive climate change legislation over 5 years ago, Representative Art Handy’s Climate Solutions Acts have consistently fallen flat at the State House. This year Handy, who chairs the House Environment and Natural Resources Committee, has taken a new approach.

His Resilient Rhode Island Act of 2014 keeps the same ambitious goals for mitigating RI carbon emissions and adds new provisions for climate adaptation, helping the State’s cities and towns coordinate in preparing for rising sea levels, increasing flooding, and more extreme weather events. By adding the adaptation piece, Handy hopes to build a stronger coalition of support behind the effort, as storms like Sandy and the floods of 2010 have convinced businesses, officials and residents alike that we need to be more prepared.

Considerable momentum has already been generated for getting this bill passed. The Coastal Resources Management Council has been conducting outreach around its Beach Special Area Management Plan (SAMP), Governor Chafee recently created the Executive Climate Change Council, the fantastic Waves of Change website was released, and Senator Whitehouse’s continued campaigning at the federal level is being heard here. The Resilient RI Act even has its own information filled website. Additionally, Brown University is devoting resources to the effort, and it is Sierra Club RI’s number one priority.

In fact, I started a petition in support of the bill yesterday that already has close to 150 signatures on it, and I invite you to be a part of creating even more momentum on Smith Hill. CLICK AND SIGN

Time is of the essence. The Resilient Rhode Island Act is going to be heard this Thursday in Handy’s committee. If you can, I urge you to come out and voice your support. The IPCC report and our own senses demand this urgency.

If we had had the wisdom to pass such legislation twenty years ago when the science supporting it was already demanding such action, we would not have suffered so badly from Sandy’s glancing blow, and we would have created the framework for building a clean energy economy that would have meant thousands of good paying jobs. Better late than never, right? Just ask Sheldon:

Fossil Free RI puts Rhode Island climate bill in perspective


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Cumulative 1751-2012 emissions: USA with it 5% of the world population is responsible for 25% of the CO_2 emissions

Representative Art Handy, Chairman of the House Environment and Natural Resources Committee, hosted an informational briefing on Tuesday, February 25, in the RI State House Members  Lounge.  He will introduce a climate bill during this legislative session.

Fossil Free Rhode Island (FFRI) was available to present it concerns regarding the draft climate bill. Climate research shows that there is a limit to the amount of carbon-dioxide the atmosphere can absorb without causing a climate catastrophe.[1]  What counts is the cumulative total since the beginning of the industrial revolution; when and where do not matter. Generations inhabiting Earth have to live within a fixed carbon-dioxide budget.

Cumulative 1751-2012 emissions: USA with it 5% of the world population is responsible for 25% of the CO_2 emissions
Cumulative 1751-2012 emissions: USA with it 5% of the world population is responsible for 25% of the CO_2 emissions

Accordingly, a climate bill must contain a limit on emissions and a mechanism to check its observance. The draft climate bill overshoots humanity’s budget by about 25% when scaled to the level of the globe, assuming that people are created equally and live accordingly.

The science is problematic, but global fairness is an issue too. The industrialized nations, mostly in the global north, have vastly over-spent their fair share of the carbon-dioxide budget. We have created the global climate problem and without the admission that we are “carbon debtor” nations a way out of the global climate change problem will remain elusive. The massive walkout at the UN climate talks COP19 in Warsaw in November of 2013 is a reminder of this reality.

There is a third problem.  As some nations reduce their use of fossil fuels, the resulting surplus will be exported to be burned elsewhere.  Indeed, according to the Quarterly Coal Report of US Energy Information Administration coal exports have quadrupled over the last five years. To reverse this, carbon debtor nations must mount a global program to develop and implement carbon-free technologies and carry the burden that they have laid on the world.

This reality exposes as fraudulent major parts of the White House Climate Action Plan which touts natural gas as a “bridge fuel.”  With its life cycle emission likely to exceed that of coal, and with its extraction that poisons the local communities natural gas is a bridge to nowhere. See Howarth et al. in Atmospheric Methane.

Responding to economic pressure to export fossil fuels, the White House aims for fast-track approval of the construction of a facility at Cove Point on Chesapeake Bay to liquefy gas extracted in Appalachia.  See A Big Fracking Lie.

Here in the North-East, there is the Algonquin Gas Transmission Pipeline expansion project.  Spectra Energy’s proposed expansion of this pipeline with a compressor station in Burrilville would, as FFRI’s Nick Katkevich of Providence, RI, said: “expose residents to increased risk of headaches, dizziness, respiratory and cardiovascular problems, and cancer, as well as a greater risk of explosions.” Nick stressed that

kicking our oil, coal and gas addiction isn’t just about global warming, it’s also about protecting our communities from the immediate dangers of extracting, transporting and burning fossil fuels.

Among the latest maneuvers that jeopardize environmental safeguards are the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and Transatlantic Free Trade Area (TAFTA) negotiations.  The realization of such treaties, designed to pamper too-big-to-fail corporations, will compound an already dangerous economic and legal environment.

With the window dressing stripped away, the administration’s business-as-usual approach is painfully obvious.  The State Department’s release of the Keystone XL environmental impact statement is just one dramatic example. As FFRI’s Lisa Petrie of Carolina, RI, put it:

The Keystone XL pipeline will poison our water, impose on indigenous rights and even fails The White House’s own climate test. The Keystone XL Pipeline must be rejected!

Wakefield Vigil Against Keystone XL -- February 24, 2014
Wakefield Vigil Against Keystone XL — February 24, 2014, (Photo by Robert Malin.)

While Fossil Free RI appreciates Rep. Handy’s leadership in drafting a bill that is a huge step forward, we stress that it is of essence that a climate bill articulate a global perspective based on morality, economics, and science, the essential elements of the solution of the global climate change problem.  Compromise is not an option and triangulation may provide a sense of accomplishment but it will not suspend the laws of physics.

[1] A longer version of the paper Assessing “Dangerous Climate Change”: Required Reduction of Carbon Emissions to Protect Young People, Future Generations and Nature by Hansen et al. is available here.

Rhode Islanders move to end Citizens United

MTAprotestSignRhode Island Move to Amend  held a meeting Monday night at the Warwick Public Library  to discuss ways in which to reverse the Supreme Court’s controversial and unpopular Citizens United  decision. House Bill 6051, introduced by Representative Art Handy, seeks to challenge the Supreme Court ruling by asserting that Corporations are not persons and that money is not speech. Passing such a law, in direct contravention to the Supreme Court could have several effects. The Supreme Court may strike down the law upon consideration or it may use the law to reconsider it’s previous decision. Supporters say that both outcomes will lead to fresh discussions on the corrupting influence of money on our political system.

Over the course of the next several months Rhode Island Move to Amend will be working to engage the public and our legislators over this very important issue. You can help by joining Rhode Island Move to Amend.

Major rhetorical territory was staked out at the House Judiciary Committee meeting held on May 9, to discuss the bill.  Abel Collins, who heads up the Move to Amend Coalition, stated it plainly when he said, “Now is the time to stop [corporations]… which are really just legal fictions, from having the same rights as persons.”

Chris Curry, of RI MoveOn.org, spoke forcefully of the dystopian impact of Citizens United.

Of all the issues we address, nothing even comes close to matching Citizens United’s ability to inspire rage and indignation in just about everyone I talk to. Not because it’s so fundamentally dishonest that corporations are people or that money equals speech, it’s because they consider the five justices of the Supreme Court who made that ruling to have violated their oath of office by unconstitutionally establishing a framework for a takeover of our country by multinational corporations.

A spokesperson for the RI Sierra Club said, “Rhode Island should get in front of this issue our state was founded by thinkers who were not afraid to be contrarians to the dominant paradigms of the time. We should make a stand and say that our country is for the people and by the people and not for sale to the highest bidder.”

In counterpoint, the RI ACLU opposes any legislation that might open the door to restricting political speech, or limiting a person’s right to use money to advance their speech.

“I’ve heard this a lot, that ‘money is not speech,'” said RI ACLU Director Steve Brown, “That’s a very catchy slogan, but it really simplifies a much more complicated issue. Money is not necessarily speech but it certainly facilitates a lot of speech and it is necessary to facilitate a lot of speech…

If you want to prepare a flyer, and get fifty copies made at Kinko’s to express your opposition to this constitutional amendment it costs money. To just say that money is not speech and therefore can be regulated is to say that the General assembly could say, “You cannot spend money if it’s to be used to prepare a flyer on a political issue.”

We think that the State Constitution would be diminished and demeaned by adding a provision like this into a very important document meant to protect all of our rights.

Amplifying Steve Brown’s points and adopting the ACLU’s position as his own was a spokesperson for the RI Tea Party, who said, perversely, “Citizens United struck a tremendous blow for the First Amendment,” and added,

Money is not the problem. Corporations are not evil entities in and of themselves. Corporations are nothing more than collections of individuals and people who are responsible for their own decisions.

Stepping on the First Amendment is a slippery slope that we cannot walk onto. That is the reason why, for philosophical reasons, that we have to oppose this.

John Marion of Common Cause RI struck a mostly neutral tone. The national organization has not yet reached a consensus on the kind of language it would like to see in a bill designed to take on Citizen’s United, and though he appreciated Art Handy and Move to Amend’s efforts, he urged caution.

We appreciate the efforts of Move to Amend and the other groups that have come out with specific language, but as Mr. Brown said, this is very weighty a matter. We disagree with the ACLU’s belief that you shouldn’t tinker because this problem is one created by an interpretation of the Constitution, so it can only be solved by a change to our Constitution.

People talk about Citizens United, Citizens United, Citizens United, but really this is about a case in 1876, Buckley v. Valeo which is the case that basically decided that money is the functional equivalent of speech and therefore since we can’t limit the speech, we can’t limit the money. So I think its really important that we go back and look at that decision and the context of that decision.

Perhaps the most pragmatic and compelling statement came from Jerry Belair, speaking for the RI Progressive Democrats, not because of his politics, but because of his career as a corporate attorney.

I’m a corporate attorney. I can tell you clearly that a corporation is not a person. We establish a corporation for the purposes of making business easy for us. It’s a very successful way of doing business. It’s also a means of limiting our liability… That the purpose for these entities. And to even suggest that somehow a corporation has attained personhood under either the Federal Constitution or a state constitution is insidious. It’s the most insidious attack on our democracy that I’ve seen in my lifetime.

It is clear that money in politics, money as speech and corporate personhood are large issues that demand lots of thought and definitive action.  The ACLU would support a slate of legislation to address these issues, even as it continues to support Citizens United:

…the ACLU supports a comprehensive and meaningful system of public financing that would help create a level playing field for every qualified candidate. We support carefully drawn disclosure rules. We support reasonable limits on campaign contributions and we support stricter enforcement of existing bans on coordination between candidates and super PACs.

Perhaps these concerns can be addressed in the way that the ACLU would like, but even the ACLU sees the prospects of real reform as being rather dim. In the very next paragraph the group opines that,

Some argue that campaign finance laws can be surgically drafted to protect legitimate political speech while restricting speech that leads to undue influence by wealthy special interests. Experience over the last 40 years has taught us that money always finds an outlet, and the endless search for loopholes simply creates the next target for new regulation. It also contributes to cynicism about our political process.

I would suggest that the cynicism is all the ACLU’s. Under their formulation, money is not just speech, money is power, and it will always find a way to corrupt our political system. Anything we do to change this system, the ACLU seems to say, can only potentially make things worse. Such an outlook is the epitome of cynicism.

RI Move to Amend is hopeful in that particular way Rhode Island embodies Hope, and emblazons this word on our state flag. Our state was born out of Hope and has stood up to an enormously powerful enemy with near infinite money and power before. On the issue of corporate personhood Rhode Island can show the way just as we did 241 years ago when the HMS Gaspee burned.

The fight against corporate personhood is the ultimate civil rights battle. With this legislation Rhode Island can once again strike the first blow for freedom and ignite a revolution that can bring an end to the specter of corporate oligarchy.

Primaries Prove Fruitful for Progressive Agenda


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
State House Dome from North Main Street
State House Dome from North Main Street
The State House dome from North Main Street. (Photo by Bob Plain)

While there was no landslide for liberal State House candidates, Tuesday’s primary still proved to be a big victory for the progressive agenda.

Gayle Goldin easily beat charter school advocate Maryellen Butke in one of the most ballyhooed contests of the primary. Goldin’s victory ensures that Rhoda Perry’s former seat will stay in the hands of a true progressive.

West Warwick’s Adam Satchell, a supporter of marriage equality, collective bargaining rights and renewable energy, was another big win. He beat Michael Pigna, a foe of gay marriage, by a healthy margin.

But even more important is who lost. Woonsocket’s Jon Brien, an ALEC board member and one of the most conservative members of the General Assembly, fell to local firefighter Stephen Casey. While Casey could prove to be a good progressive, Brien was a sworn enemy of left and the legislature gets demonstrably more liberal with his absence.

While both Lauara Pisaturo, of Warwick, and Bob DaSilva, of East Providence, lost, they both had strong showings and only lost to powerful incumbents by a total of of less than 300 votes. That doesn’t speak well for Michael McCaffrey or Dan DaPonte, who beat them, both who are committee chairmen and are in the good graces of leadership. Their votes may not change on marriage equality because of the nail-biting victories (though DaPonte was on the fence) others may swing once they see that even powerful incumbents can be vulnerable.

It wasn’t a great night for House leadership either. Peter Petrarca, the House Deputy Majority Leader, lost to Greg Costantino. And even more significantly, Rep. Spencer Dickinson, a fiscal progressive from South Kingstown, beat Kathy Fogarty, the chosen candidate of House Speaker Gordon Fox.

Popular progressives like Art Handy, Chris Blazejewski and Grace Diaz all won by comfortable margins.

But the primary wasn’t without it’s defeats for progressives as well. Gus Uht lost to conservative Karen MacBeth; Libby Kimzey lost to John Lombardi; and Frank Lombardi beat Gene Dyszlewski.

Marriage equality back on State House agenda


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Same sex couples in Rhode Islanders will have another opportunity at equal protection under the law as Rep. Art Handy, D-Cranston, will again introduce a bill in the General Assembly that would afford the same marriage rights as their heterosexual counterparts enjoy.

“Every year we move forward,” Handy said, who has introduced a similar bill in the previous nine legislative sessions. Sen. Rhoda Perry, D-Prov., will introduce the bill in the Senate.

Last year, Rhode Island passed a law that allowed gay couples to enter into civil unions. But civil unions, especially Rhode Island’s version, is not tantamount to marriage.

“Separating straight and gay couples into different institutions just isn’t legal,” said Ray Sullivan, of Marriage Equality Rhode Island. “Until same sex couples can marry, Rhode Island has not achieved justice under the law.”

Aside from the fact that “separate but equal” has already been deemed unconstitutional, Rhode Island’s civil union law has a provision that allows religious institutions, such as Catholic hospitals, to be exempt from some of the law’s provisions, meaning a Catholic hospital could deny a family member access to their spouse during an emergency situation or a religious school could deny health care benefits to an employee’s same sex spouse.

There is another bill that will be introduced that would repeal this part of the state’s civil union law, known as the Corvese amendment because Rep. Doc Corvese, D-Prov. and an ardent opponent of gay rights, managed to sneak the provision into the bill at the eleventh hour last session.

Because of the Corvese Amendment, Sullivan said. “Rhode Island has far and away the most discriminatory language of any marriage or civil union bill in the country.”

Last session, the same sex marriage bill did not get a straight up or down vote, even with the speaker of the House, Gordon Fox, being openly gay. He told me after last session that not supporting gay marriage was one of the most difficult decisions of his political career.

Senate President Teresa Paiva Weed does not support equal marriage rights for same sex couples. She told me last year that she thinks Rhode Islanders are more comfortable with civil unions than gay marriage. A poll last year indicated that Rhode Island actually supports gay marriage 50 percent  to 41 percent.

Some legislators have said they worry about electoral repercussions from Catholics, but in Massachusetts “every legislator who supported marriage equality and ran for reelection was reelected,” according to Sullivan.

The marriage equality proposal was first reported by Dan McGowan of GoLocalProv.