While championing renewables, Raimondo dog whistles fossil fuels


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Newport Solar
Gina Raimondo

“At breakfast this morning my nine year old, out of the blue, said, ‘Mom, what are you doing about climate change?’” said Governor Gina Raimondo at a press event in the offices of Newport Solar on Monday, “What a perfect day to ask the question! So I told him all about this and he was proud of me that we were on that.”

Newport Solar in North Kingstown is where Raimondo chose to kick off National Energy Awareness Month with her new Office of Energy Resources (OER) commissioner Carol Grant. Newport Solar is a Rhode Island leader in solar installation, and its successful efforts should be lauded.

“Our clean energy sector in Rhode Island has created a slew of new opportunities for education and jobs, and that will continue as we move forward in building the clean energy industry,” said Raimondo at the event.

Commissioner Grant spoke about Rhode Island’s high ranking in the State Energy Efficiency Scorecard. The American Council on Energy‐Efficient Economy (ACEEE) recently ranked Rhode Island fourth in the country for best energy efficiency programs and policies. “We want to educate Rhode Islanders on the many benefits of the state’s energy efficiency and renewable energy programs,” said Grant, “and we look forward to further developing a future of clean, affordable, reliable and diversified energy.” [italics mine]

Also at the event was Michael Ryan, Vice President of Government Affairs at National Grid, encouraging Rhode Islanders to save energy.

Energy in Rhode Island needs to be “affordable, reliable, and clean” said Raimondo, “It’s got to be all three, and it can be all three.”

Later, Raimondo’s three criteria had mysteriously become four, or more. “So I’m going to continue to lead and push, as your governor, towards more clean, affordable, and reliable and diversified energy sources… to lead the nation in more and more sources of clean, renewable, affordable, sustainable energy.”

Towards the end of the presser, National Grid’s Michael Ryan, ironically standing in front of a large Newport Solar banner emblazoned with the tagline, “Think outside the grid,” mis-repeated Raimondo, saying that the energy must be “efficient, affordable and reliable.

“Those are key with National Grid.”

In the video below you can watch the complete press event. Solar, wind and efficiency were lauded but fracked gas, the third leg of Raimondo’s energy policy, and a key driver of National Grid’s business, was never mentioned except via subtle dog whistles.

These dog whistles are words like reliable, diversified and efficient. These are the words anti-environmentalists use when they want to scare us into accepting fracked gas as a bridge fuel, like when Rush Limbaugh said, “Solar panels are not sustainable, Millennials. May sound good, yes. ‘Clean, renewable energy.’ But what do you do when the sun’s down at night? What do you do when the clouds obscure the sun? We’re not there yet.”

Limbaugh admits that solar panels are clean and renewable. But he’s doubting their reliability and sustainability.

This is how a politician like Raimondo can appease companies like National Grid, which are actively working to expand Rhode Island’s dependence on fossil fuels, while publicly talking only about the work she’s doing on energy that’s actually clean and renewable.

On April 13 Raimondo appeared at a solar farm in East Providence to announce the results of the 2016 Rhode Island Clean Energy Jobs Report released by the Rhode Island OER and the Executive Office of Commerce. At this event Marion Gold, who publicly supported the power plant planned for Burrillville, was still the OER commissioner.

“The clean energy economy is supporting nearly 14,000 jobs,” said Raimondo, “a forty percent increase from last year. That is amazing.”

The press release for this event noted that this job growth was likely the result of the “maturation of the solar industry, start up activity in smart grid technologies, and the progress made on the construction of the Block Island Wind Farm.”

There was no mention at this event of fracked gas, Burrillville, Invenergy, Spectra pipelines, or National Grid’s expansion of LNG at Fields Point, until reporters asked the governor about it directly, at which point Raimondo somewhat reluctantly admitted that she does in fact support Invenergy’s $700 million fracked gas and diesel oil burning power plant planned for Burrillville.

In Raimondo’s capacity as vice chair of the Governors’ Wind Energy Coalition she was proud to “support the foresight of my colleagues to broaden the Coalition’s focus and include solar energy development as a policy priority. Wind and solar provide complementary benefits to the U.S. electric grid and will help diversify the country’s energy mix. The need for states to take a broader view of renewable power is clear.”

Again, no mention of her support for fracked gas.

Newport SolarRaimondo has consistently touted her support for renewables like wind and solar, only occasionally voicing her support for fracking. Raimondo never holds a press release in front of a fracked gas pipeline or compressor station. She holds them at wind turbines and solar farms, giving the appearance of a strong leader on the environment.

But National Grid and Invenergy need to know she’s on board with their plans, so she signals her support during the press conference with careful phrasing.

And if the governor’s phrasing is off message, National Grid’s Michael Ryan will misquote her. “Clean” energy is out, “reliable” energy is in. In other words, “Let them eat fracked gas.”

Raimondo’s choice of location for her press conferences demonstrates that if she is not embarrassed by her support of fracked gas, she at least is beginning to recognize how history will ultimately judge her support.

As Bill McKibben said in a recent message to Rhode Island, “Five to ten years ago we thought the transition was going to be from coal, to natural gas as some sort of bridge fuel, onto renewables and now, sadly, we realize we can’t do that in good faith, because natural gas… turns out to be a dead end, not a bridge to the future but a kind of rickety pier built out into the lake of hydrocarbons.”

Fracked gas was well known to be a bad idea when Raimondo stood with Invenergy’s CEO Michael Polsky and tried to sell the idea to Rhode Island. Raimondo’s support for Invenergy’s power plant was a massive political blunder with consequences not only for her political career, but for the future of Rhode Island and the world.

A future, and a world, her children will be living in.

In message to Rhode Island, Bill McKibben praises and undercuts Sheldon Whitehouse on climate change


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
McKibben
Bill McKibben

“Five to ten years ago we thought the transition was going to be from coal, to natural gas as some sort of bridge fuel, onto renewables,” said 350.org’s Bill McKibben in a message to Rhode Island, “and now, sadly, we realize we can’t do that in good faith, because natural gas turns out not to work that way, as a bridge fuel.”

McKibben, a leading voice on the dangers of climate change, was speaking in a video message to Senator Sheldon Whitehouse’s annual Rhode Island Energy & Environmental Leaders Day” conference at the Rhode Island Convention Center last Friday.

McKibben started his eight minute message with praise for Whitehouse, calling him an “indefatigable leader,” along with Senator Bernie Sanders, around climate change issues. McKibben called Whitehouse’s Friday dialogues on the Senate floor against climate change and ExxonMobile “relentless” and “remarkable.”

“There are moments when I hope that his last name turns out to be a key to his and our future, but that’s for another day,” said McKibben.

But McKibben was also relentless in his condemnation of natural gas.

Natural gas, said McKibben, “turns out to be a dead end, not a bridge to the future but a kind of rickety pier built out into the lake of hydrocarbons. So we’ve got to make the transition to renewables now, and fast.

“We have to forget about bridges and make that leap.”

Earlier that day, during a question and answer session, Senator Whitehouse once again declined to speak out against the natural gas infrastructure projects currently threatening Rhode Island’s ability to meet carbon and greenhouse gas reduction goals. Greg Gerritt, of ProsperityforRI.com, confronted Whitehouse, saying that the “resistance,” those engaged in front line battles against fossil fuel infrastructure, was ultimately going to have a greater effect than the carbon tax that Whitehouse champions.

“People are saying no more fossil fuel pipelines, no more power plants, no more compressor stations, and they’re putting their bodies out there,” said Gerritt, “I want us to think about how the dark money plays out in a place like Rhode Island where you can talk about climate change, but you can’t actually stop anything.

“The politicians are all saying, ‘even though we know that if we build this we can’t ever meet our carbon goal, we still want to build a power plant.’ And I want to know what are we going to do so that on the ground, here in our own communities, that this power of the fossil fuel industry gets stopped.”

Whitehouse countered that his job in the Senate “is to try to solve this in a place where it will have the most powerful effect that it can, across the board. I will never win this fight, from where I sit, plant by plant. I just won’t, can’t. Too many of them, too much going on, and frankly there are hundreds of others that are being built while some are being protested, there are hundreds of other pipelines being used while one is being protested.

“It’s not effective, to, in my view, uh, it makes a difference, it sends a message, I don’t undercut what people are doing. I think what we did with Keystone helped send a big message, but my job, I think, is two things:

“One, fix that problem of the huge subsidy [for fossil fuel companies] because $700 billion a year or $200 billion a year sends such a powerful message through the entire economy,

“The second is, I see Meg Curran here, the chairman (sic) of the Public Utilities Commission, and we’re working with them, we’re working with FERC, we’re working with the ISO, we’re working with NEPOOL group, to try to make sure that the rules for these siting things, get adjusted. because the rules for these siting plans leave out the enormous cost of carbon.

“So for me, it’s these federal ground rules, to make them responsive to clean energy, to get them to reward the cleanness of clean energy, and to make fossil fuel pay its cost… that’s where I’m focused.”

However, if we are to heed McKibben’s video message, then Whitehouse’s focus seems like a small step, not the leap that McKibben says we need.

“The good news,” said McKibben, “is the distance we have to  leap is shorter than we thought because the engineers have done such a good job with renewable technology. During the last ten years the price of solar panels dropped eighty percent. There’s not an economic statistic on our planet more important than that.

“What it means is that we now have a chance, an outside chance, of getting ahead of the physics of climate change. It would require a serious mobilization and a huge effort.”

McKibben has written about what such a mobilization would look like in the New Republic that is worth a read.

“I think we’re going to need real, powerful leadership in order to help us, as FDR helped us once upon a time to take those steps in the right direction.

“The question is not, ‘Are we going to do this?’ Everyone knows that 75 years from now we’ll power our planet with sun and wind,” said McKibben, “The question is ‘Are we going to do it in time to be able to slow down climate change?’ … It may be the most important question that humans have ever faced.

“I wrote the first book about it all back in 1989. The cheerful title of that book was The End of Nature. I fear that not much has happened since to make me want to change the title.

“We’re in a very deep hole,” said McKibben, “and the first rule of holes is to stop digging for coal, for oil or gas and start instead to take advantage of all that green power coming from above from the sun and the wind that we’ve been wasting for so long.”

Fighting climate change will require radical economic solutions


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

WhichWayOutArriving in New York for the People’s Climate March a day early allowed me the opportunity to attend The Climate Crisis: Which Way Out, a forum featuring Senator Bernie Sanders, climate activist Bill McKibben, author Naomi Klein, journalist Chris Hedges and Seattle City Councillor Kshama Sawant.

The event was hosted at the Unitarian Church of All Souls, not too far from Central Park. Seating was first come, first serve, and it filled up quickly. While waiting outside, I noticed Chris Hedges making his way to the event, occasionally stopping to exchange words with those in line. His public persona so dour, it was refreshing to see Hedges smile and enjoy his interactions with the public.

Those waiting in line were targeted by a steady stream of leafleteers offering the opportunity to attend other climate change related events. Young people wearing Socialist Alternative t-shirts, the group made famous by Kshama Sawant, worked the line, selling copies of their newspaper. I’ve often thought that the modern socialist movement needs to be more… modern. Selling newsprint to advance a political agenda feels so 1920s in the age of the Internet.

Once inside I notice Unitarian Universalist President Reverend Peter Morales sitting near the front, with the U.U. United Nations liaison Bruce Knotts. I shake Reverend Morales’ hand. We’ve met twice before, but he doesn’t seem to recognize me. Later I notice that Morales has left the event early. I’m not sure when, but I can’t help but feel that the radical politics on display expressed by the speakers may have had something to do with it.

The event starts late, because Bernie Sanders is stuck in traffic. When it starts, and the guests step out on stage, Naomi Klein takes one look at the Aquafina water bottles and turns around. A minute later one of the organizers comes out and removes the bottled waters and replaces them with pitchers of ice water and paper cups. Score one for a good environmentalist.

DSC_3168
Bernie Sanders

Bernie Sanders is the keynote speaker. He starts out strong, saying, “Climate change is real. The debate is over about about the cause and the impacts of global warming.” The crowd loves this. There are shouts of “Run, Bernie, run!”

But then there is a commotion. Some of the people sitting near me get up and unfurl a banner in front of Sanders that reads, “Bernie voted for the war on the indigenous people of Palestine.” Sanders is caught off guard by this, and his speech stumbles. Some in the crowd cheer for this reminder about the plight of Palestine, others are uncertain as to how to react. A woman comes forward and asks the protesters to “sit down, you’ve made your point.”

To my surprise, the protesters do sit down, their point well made.

Sanders rallies and gets back into his speech, but he’s off his game now, and he never quite resonates as strongly as when he started. Still, more than a third of the audience stands in applause as he wraps up. “Nothing passes the United States Congress without the approval of the Oil Companies, Corporate America and Wall St.,” says the Senator Sanders.

“Take to the streets,” he said. “We can hurt them.”

Bill McKibben, founder of 350.org, the man and the group most responsible for the People’s Climate March, begins by announcing that official estimates place the expected crowd at tomorrow’s rally at about 200,000 attendees. (In fact the number was twice that.) It will be by far the largest climate change rally in history.

McKibben talks about how opposition to the Keystone Pipeline led one oil executive to lament that, “We’ll never be allowed to build a pipeline in peace again.” There are laughs at this, but McKibben isn’t making jokes or declaring victories.

This march is bigger than one pipeline or tar sands oil or fracking, says Mckibben. This march is the “burglar alarm” on the people who are trying to steal our future.

“We need to take on the Koch Brothers directly,” says McKibben, adding that in the face of such a terrific threat to humanity and the planet, “It’s an obligation and a privilege to be around right now.”

Author Naomi Klein, whose new book, This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate nails the climate change zeitgeist, made no apologies for framing the battle in stark economic and social justice terms. Klein maintains that the reason we can’t get off oil and adopt clean energy solutions is because of the neoliberal agenda advanced by free market extremists. Unrestricted free trade, the privatization of government services and the imposition of extreme austerity have crippled our ability to respond in any meaningful way to this imminent disaster.

We need to “break every rule in their idiotic playbook because [neoliberalism] is at war with life on Earth,” she said.

DSC_3143
Chris Hedges

More dour and more radical was journalist Chris Hedges. The People’s Climate March, said Hedges, is but a “prelude to resistance.” Framing the issue as “the beginning of a titanic clash between our corporate masters and ourselves,” Hedges said that it is fast becoming time to “speak in the language of overthrow and revolution.”

Working with the Democratic Party, says Hedges, is pointless. “We’re pouring energy into a black hole.”

As the guests were introduced at the beginning of the program, the biggest cheers were for Kshama Sawant. No surprise; the line was packed with New York members of Socialist Alternative. In Seattle Sawant ran as an unrepentant and open socialist and won a seat on the Seattle City Council, pushing through a bill for a $15 an hour minimum wage, the highest minimum wage in the country. She donates most of her City Council pay to social change groups, keeping only “an average worker’s salary” for herself. She’s impressive, but when she speaks in her careful, accented way, she is electric.

Sawant stands and reads her simple declarative statements with both precision and compassion. “Tomorrow’s protests,” says Sawant, “must represent a turning point.” We must “bring the giant corporations into public ownership,” because, “you cannot control what you do not own.”

DSC_3169
Kshama Sawant

“We cannot be bound by what is acceptable to big corporations” who believe that, “the Market is God, and everything is sacrificed on the altar of profit.”

The crowd responds with enthusiasm or surprise. Klein, Hedges and Sawant, each more radical than the last, are literally calling for economic revolution as our only hope to avoid the burning of the planet.

When Sawant finishes, there are calls from the crowd. “You should run!” says one woman, echoing the calls of the Bernie Sanders supporters from the beginning of the forum. Sawant smiles. She surely recognizes that the call for her to run is an emotional, not logical reaction, but suddenly Sawant doesn’t seem to be channeling the past, as I mentioned when I saw her supporters selling newspaper outside. Instead, Sawant seems to be summoning the future.

As power and money continues to consolidate in the hands of fewer and ever more powerful corporate hands, and as the extinction clock for all life on Earth continues to count down, the revolutionary begins to seem less impossible and more imminent. As Naomi Klein says in the title of her book, climate change “changes everything.”