House budget bill contains wins, losses for progressive left


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Mattiello 2The budget passed by the House Finance Committee last night, and slated to be vetted by the full chamber next Wednesday, contains some wins and some losses for the progressive left.

The budget bill contains some money to restore low-cost bus fare for indigent people – a social service that RIPTA cut earlier this year. The RIPTA Riders Alliance declined comment until more information is available. House Speaker Nick Mattiello told RI Future the funding for this program is temporary and said larger changes with RIPTA are afoot.

The proposed budget also includes new money to pay nursing home caregivers and those who works with the developmentally disabled. The investment would help raise wages for underpaid caregivers, many of whom work full time and still live in poverty. SEIU officials hailed the move as a step toward a $15 an hour minimum wage for front line caregivers.

It also preserves Governor Gina Raimondo’s increase to the Earned Income Tax Credit, and increased the investment in housing for the homeless proposed by Raimondo.

“We find it encouraging that the House Finance Committee showed their commitment and concern for Rhode Islanders experiencing housing insecurity by supporting the Governor’s budget proposal for affordable housing production and adding an additional $10 million for urban revitalization and blight remediation for a total $50 million Housing Opportunity Bond,” said Jim Ryczek, executive director of the RI Coalition for the Homeless. “We appreciate that the House Finance Committee ensured that this year’s budget invests in the long-term solutions to addressing homelessness and the lack of affordable housing in our state.”

But the House budget left out a proposed increase to the minimum wage that Raimondo included in her budget proposal. The current minimum wage in Rhode Island is $9.60 and Raimondo’s budget proposal would have raised it to $10.10. While the minimum wage does not have a fiscal effect on the budget, it is customary in Rhode Island to include policy changes in the state budget.

The House budget also nixed Raimondo’s proposal to increase investment in the school construction bond money. Many urban school buildings in Rhode Island are in dire need of repair.

It reduced Raimondo’s proposed fee on medical marijuana plants from $150 to $25. While the House measure exempts low income people from the fee, it still requires a new state tag for each plant – a move opposed by independent growers of medical marijuana.

While medical marijuana patients will pay more, beach goers will pay less under the proposed House budget. According to a news release from the House of Representatives, “Just in time for beach season, the Finance Committee slashed parking fees at state beaches — mostly in half — to better enable Rhode Islanders and visitors to enjoy one of the state’s greatest treasures. The cuts, effective July 1, eliminate hikes made in 2012, and apply to all types of passes: single-day weekend and weekday as well as season passes for residents, nonresidents and senior citizens. (Admission to state beaches themselves is free.)”

Charter school opponents should be even more pleased with the House budget proposal than with Raimondo’s version. According to the news release, “The [finance] committee moderated the governor’s proposal somewhat, allowing districts to reduce payments by either 7 percent of the per-pupil tuition cost or the average difference between per-pupil unique costs of the sending districts and those of the charter schools, whichever is greater. The committee also provided some temporary relief for districts with particularly high concentrations of students attending charter or vocational schools.”

And the House budget seems to make it easier for Rhode Islanders to generate more renewable energy. The proposal “expanded the state’s net metering program to allow “virtual” or off-site net metering by all customers, opening up access to renewable energy generation to more Rhode Islanders. Net metering is a practice that allows those who install renewable energy systems such as solar panels to connect them to the electric grid and receive credit on their bill for any excess energy they generate,” according to the House news release.

But a reader sent this comment: “The budget article 18 expands net metering, but it has a completely silly cap on it (major concession to Grid), and messes up the rates (another major concession). It will serve as a disincentive to net metering, not an incentive. The PUC is in the middle of considering the right net metering rate, and this is sort of like sticking a monkeywrench into their machinery. This is in no way a win, except superficially.”

The House is expected to vote on the budget bill next Wednesday.

Senate Finance approves budget while advocacy groups respond


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Senate Finance beginning to discuss the FY16 budget
Senate Finance beginning to discuss the FY16 budget

Much like its House counterpart, the Senate Finance Committee passed the FY16 budget bill unanimously with almost no discussion other than to speak on its merits.

“I would certainly characterize this budget as one that is not only ambitious, but one that makes a significant investment in areas that should have been invested in in the past,” Chairman Daniel DaPonte (D- District 14) said to begin the meeting. He added in a press release that the budget helps to put Rhode Island back on the right track economically.

“This is a budget that Rhode Island’s economy needs and through its passage will continue the economic stability and reform that delivers the message that Rhode Island’s economy is back and open for business.”

One of the short discussion points brought up during the meeting was whether or not the budget provided opportunities for youth.

“There have been some pockets that have been filled here, but I suggest that next year we consider providing more job opportunities for youth,” Senator Juan Pichardo (D- District 2) said.

DaPonte agreed with Pichardo, but also reminded the committee that there is no one specific way to keep youth working in the state.

“I think initiatives to focus on keeping young people here and getting them up and running are incorporated in the budget in a variety of different places and a variety of different ways,” he said. “I think the sum of all these parts is a statement to us not only wanting to keep these folks here, but increase the number of opportunities available.”

The night before, the House of Representatives was very kind to the bill as well, passing it through to the Senate after a swift three-hour session. Before its passage, many took the time to thank not only House Finance Committee Chairman Raymond Gallison (D- District 69), and Speaker Nicholas Mattiello, but the House Fiscal Advisory staff as well.

Other groups outside of the State House are also pleased with the budget. Planned Parenthood, which fought against the restrictive abortion insurance coverage in Article 18, said in a press release that they are pleased with the outcome of the bill.

“While we were disappointed the governor unnecessarily chose to widely expand the number of plans that do not cover abortion beyond federal minimum standards, the action by the General Assembly today ensures employers cannot unilaterally limit reproductive health care service coverage for their employers. This amendment will require employers and insurance carriers to clearly indicate when an employer is opting out of covering certain reproductive healthcare services, so that no one will be surprised by a lack of coverage for routine procedures.”

But, while many have championed the budget as a success story, there are still those that are dissatisfied. Common Cause Rhode Island, an advocacy and lobbyist group for transparent government, has expressed discontent with the budget’s provision for Governor Raimondo’s pension settlement.

“This extraordinary legislation, that will affect every Rhode Islander – and every Rhode Island state and municipal budget – for decades, should not be rolled into the annual budget as if it were just another article,” said executive director John Marion. “The budget debate that typically occurs in a single evening and includes debates on amendments concerning dozens of issues is not the place for this important legislation. It deserves special consideration so legislators, as much as they did in the special session in 2011, can take this up on the merits alone.”

Budget bill passes House floor with almost no debate


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Photo of the final House vote on the FY16 budget
Photo of the final House vote on the FY16 budget

In what everyone thought would be a firestorm of debate, the RI House of Representatives unanimously passed the $8.7 billion FY 2016 budget with little to no discussion about many of the articles, including the much contested Medicaid cuts and pension settlement, as well as Governor Raimondo’s so called “job tools.” According to a House spokesperson, this is the fastest that the budget has gone through in nearly three decades.

The only budget articles that were seriously debated on the floor were numbers 11, which concerned taxes and revenues; and 18, which provided the funding to HealthSource RI, Rhode Island’s Affordable Care Act state exchange. There were two article introductions during the debate, one concerning the funding for the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority (RIPTA), and one simply to renumber the articles in the bill after its introduction. Representative Patricia Morgan (R-District 26), was going to introduce an article to fund bridge repairs, but recognized that she did not have the support to pass it.

Although discussion was sparse on the floor, Rep. Morgan was one of the few members who continually sparked debate, particularly over article 11, which had the longest discussion out of all of the sections voted upon. Amendments had already been proposed to the article, but had been struck down. Morgan proposed two amendments herself, the first of which would promote lean government standards for the state, and according to her, dramatically decrease costs for running state government.

“Many states at this point, have already started lean government initiatives, and it has given them a lot of fruit,” she said. “There are incredible efficiencies that have resulted from lean government.

Morgan planned to pay for the new service by taking $500,000 from the Newport Grand Casino and putting it towards creating a lean government initiative, which Governor Raimondo has already stated she supports. Her reasoning? That the casino was not in dire need of the funds.

“Last year, the new owner proposed $40 million for remodeling,” Morgan said. “If he has $40 million for that, I guess he can give up $500,000.”

The amendment saw staunch opposition, especially because, according to several representatives, 60 percent of the casino’s money goes directly back into the state.

“Just because Newport Grand may be part of corporate America, we are here to help businesses thrive in our economy,” Representative Dennis Canario (D-District 71) said.

“To take $500,000 out of Newport Grand would jeopardize the integrity of that business,” House Majority Leader John DeSimone (D-District 5), argued.

Although Morgan’s first amendment failed 71-4, she brought up another amendment immediately after that tried to use the same funds from Newport Grand to pay for a 38 Studios investigation.

“The people of this state deserve to know how it happened, why it happened, who did it, and try to keep it from ever happening again,” Morgan said.

Her second amendment did not even get the chance to go up for debate, as it was ruled not germane to the discussion. The ruling was met with cheers from other representatives.

Article 18 funded HealthSource RI, which has been hotly contested over the past few days due to restrictive abortion coverage language. However, Finance Committee Chairman Representative Raymond Gallison (D- District 69) introduced an amendment that would curb such restrictions, and allow access for those who require abortions even if their insurance plan has cited religious exemptions from covering them.

Surprisingly, the amendment passed with no discussion, but the article itself saw debate due to King V. Burwell, the current Supreme Court case determining whether or not states should receive tax subsidies from having their own healthcare exchanges. While some representatives thought that keeping the exchange would make Rhode Island less business friendly, it was upheld in the vote.

What is more striking than what was debated, though, is what was not. Cornerstone legislation in the bill went by without so much as a peep from representatives. Medicaid cuts, the pension settlement, Raimondo’s jobs initiative, professional licensing, all day kindergarten, school construction, and even appropriations of funds from FY 15 are just some of the examples of what saw next to no discussion. Even Gallison’s surprise article that raised RIPTA fares for the elderly and low income to $1, up from no cost at all, saw little debate.

After only three short hours, the budget was unanimously passed, with daylight still shining down on the State House.

“The House of Representatives is very committed to working together on behalf of the citizens of the state of Rhode Island,” Speaker Mattiello said of the speedy voting process. “That the House has worked very collaboratively with the Governor and the Senate President, and that there’s a focus on jobs and the economy. When we put out a pro-jobs budget, pro-economy budget, the members rallied around it and responded appropriately.”

Mattiello also did not rule out the option of a special fall session to handle Governor Raimondo’s proposed toll tax. It is actually very likely, he said.

As for Rep. Morgan, she believes that she was one of the only members of the House who actively stood up for what they believe in on the floor tonight.

“I’ll fight for the people of Rhode Island all day long. I’ll fight for better government in our state,” she said after the meeting. “But, I can’t do it alone. The people need to send me more support.”

“I don’t know why they didn’t speak up,” Morgan added. “There were things that should have been said. There was debate that should have gone on. There are things that are objectionable. I have no idea why people didn’t stand up and fight for the things that they believe in.”

But, even without the support for her amendments, Morgan still voted in favor of the budget because it was, for the most part, in line with her beliefs.

“I voted for the budget because there were a lot of really good Republican proposals in it, that I think will help Rhode Island, and I didn’t want to see them not get support.”

The bill will go to the Senate floor for hearing on Wednesday, where if approved, will become the official FY 16 budget for Rhode Island.

Tanzi stumps for South County as budget cuts its tourism funding


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Just because House Finance passed the FY 2016 budget onto the House floor for next Tuesday, doesn’t mean the entire House of Representatives has to like it. In fact, much of the bill is contested – such as the tourism cuts that Representative Teresa Tanzi, Narragansett/South Kingstown, has voiced her opposition to.

The RI House of Representatives before convening on the floor on June 11, 2015
The RI House of Representatives before convening on the floor on June 11, 2015

“When I moved here from Utah, everyone said “Oh, Newport, Providence!” People already know about Newport and Providence and I would say “No, Narragansett,” and nobody would know what Narragansett was. I have a really difficult time turning a portion of our money over from South County to help promote more Providence and more Newport.” she said, citing that the South County tourism board works very hard to market their area of the state.”

In response House Speaker Nick Mattiello said, “Despite that wonderful job, everyone still talks about Providence and Newport. It’s the integrity of the entire system that we’re looking at, and you need a Rhode Island brand. It’s not about localities. The current system doesn’t work, and we cannot go back to a system that doesn’t work.”

Their disagreement stems from Governor Gina Raimondo’s idea to centralize state tourism spending. Currently, Rhode Island has no unified state marketing efforts and instead dives proceeds from hotel tax receipts between 8 regional tourism agencies. The money will now go more towards the state Commerce Corporation, rather than the tourism bureaus themselves. In the House version of the budget, $4.7 million goes straight to the Commerce Corporation, while less than a million goes to the actual tourism district. In Gov. Raimondo’s version, $6.4 million would go to the corporation, leaving the districts with $1.7 million.

Rep. Tanzi (D- District 34). Photo courtesy of http://www.rilin.state.ri.us/
Rep. Tanzi (D- District 34)

After the hearing, Tanzi continued to express her concerns about the funding cuts, and how they will harm her district as a whole.

“I think that the way that the South County tourism board is run is actually very effective. We have been compliant, we turn in our reports when we’re supposed to, our production cost of our marketing materials, everything is done in house. We’re very conscientious about how the money is spent,” she said, especially in comparison to other tourism boards across the state. Tanzi believes that this will only disserve the southern portion of Rhode Island, especially because Newport and Providence, in her opinion, do not need more marketing.

“The beaches are their own unique part of it,” she said. “We need to have our own budget to market that appropriately. We’re competing with the Cape, we’re not competing with Massachusetts.”

As the budget is currently written, Tanzi stated that to “cannibalize” the smaller parts of the state in order to market Rhode Island as a whole is not the best use of money, and it will only show poorly within the coming years.

“My guess is that my businesses in South County, who have five months out of the year at most, to make their living to make it through the entire summer, are going to suffer as a result of this,” she said. Tanzi has spoken to many of the businesses in her district since the budget first came out in March, adding that such funds are always a concern for business owners in the area.

But, the prospect of Tanzi submitting a successful amendment to support her district is slim to none, in her view, calling South County the “small fish,” in comparison to Newport and Providence.

“Just the basic numbers of looking at it, you’re talking about a couple of South County people, versus the city folk and the Newport people, who outnumber us on the floor. So, my chances of an amendment passing are ridiculously infantile. They’re infinitesimal, they’re so small, so, no, I won’t,” she said.

Even without the hope of amending the budget, this year, though, Tanzi still holds out hope for next year, planning to bring forth data showing the exact effects of these cuts on South County tourism, and maybe even get to create a separate brand for her district in the process.

Raimondo budget amendment undermines abortion access


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Leadership
Paiva-Weed, Raimondo, Mattiello

The 2016 RI State Budget, approved by House Finance late Tuesday evening, included language on abortion coverage in its section on HealthSource RI funding that goes far beyond what is required under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This part of the budget, inserted at the request of Governor Gina Raimondo on May 29, replaced article 28 of her original budget which the General Assembly changed to Article 18 in its final version.

The part that pertains to abortion coverage reads:

(3) Any health plan that delivers a benefit plan on the exchange that covers abortion services, as defined in 45 CFR section 156.280(d)(1), shall comply with segregation of funding requirements, as well as an annual assurance statement to the Office of the Health Insurance Commissioner, in accordance with 45 C.F.R. sections 156.280(e)(3) and (5).

(4) At least one plan variation for individual market plan designs offered on the exchange at each level of coverage, as defined by section 1302(d)(1) of the federal act, at which the carrier is offering a plan or plans, shall exclude coverage for abortion services as defined in 45 CFR section 156.280(d)(1). If the health plan proposes different rates for such plan variations, each listed plan design shall include the associated rate.

(5) Health plans that offer a plan variation that excludes coverage for abortion services as defined in 45 CFR section 156.280(d)(1) for a religious exception variation in the small group market shall treat such a plan as a separate plan offering with a corresponding rate.

The ACA requires, by 2017, that a Multi-State Plan not covering most abortions be offered on every state-based health exchange. The language above mandates that every insurer operating on HealthSource RI offer multiple plans that do not cover abortion. The budget in its current form does not require that insurers offer plans to cover abortion, so any insurer not interested in offering nearly identical plans may decide to drop such coverage altogether.

The federal mandate that requires at least one plan that does not cover abortion should more than adequately cover those with a well-founded religious objection to abortion so that they can find a health plan to cover their needs.

I have made two requests to the Governor’s office, asking for clarification of the amendment’s intent and the reasoning behind the language, but these have gone unanswered.

Gina Raimondo has always maintained that she is staunchly pro-choice. That she would be behind some of the most audacious anti-choice legislation in decades, and that the language should be inserted into the budget without any public debate or comment may come as a surprise to her supporters.

After receiving the endorsement from the Planned Parenthood Votes! Rhode Island PAC, Raimondo said, ‘The Catholic Church has a clear position and I have a clear position…I am clearly pro-choice.”

But Raimondo’s Budget Article 28, by mandating that every insurer offer multiple plans that do not cover abortion, undermines the accepted medical and legal standard that abortion is a safe and legal procedure. Just as individuals do not get a choice about whether their health insurance covers blood transfusions, erectile dysfunction, or vaccinations, abortion coverage should be treated as an essential health benefit, not an outlier “variation” for which every insurance plan must make an exception.

Patreon

House Finance approves budget bill, full chamber to vote Tuesday

The House Finance Committee considers the FY 2016 budget.
The House Finance Committee considers the FY 2016 budget.

After much deliberation, the House Finance Committee gave a unanimous 19-0 vote on the FY 2016 budget late on Tuesday night, which included $37.7 million more than the proposed budget given by Governor Gina Raimondo back in March. The legislative budget proposal is for $8.67 billion dollars, with $3.55 billion from general revenue contributing to that.

“We concur with many of the governor’s initiatives for economic development,” House Finance Chairman Raymond Gallison (D-District 69) said in a press briefing tonight.

According to Gallison, the committee, in large part, accepted Raimondo’s budget, but there were some key provisions that saw change, including Social Security, Medicaid, and sales taxes to businesses.

Those who made between $80,000 and $100,000 will be exempt from paying social security income tax. These tax cuts will give retired Rhode Islanders $9.3 million in tax relief. Businesses are also now exempt from paying the sales tax on corporate utilities. Governor Raimondo had originally proposed phasing it out over five years, but will instead be taken out all at once this year. The earned income tax credit for middle to low income households has also increased from 10 percent to 12.5 percent.

The budget outlines a 2.5 percent Medicaid cut for hospitals, and a 2 percent cut for nursing homes. Gallison said this provides more protection for nursing homes. The House budget cuts Medicaid roughly $67 million, a far cry from the $90 million that the governor had proposed, but the hospital license fee has been increased to 5.862 percent, which would bring in $13 million in additional revenue.

“Funding to maintain HealthSource RI is included in the budget,” Gallison said, outlining the distribution changes to its funding. Now, individuals will pay a surcharge of 2.86 percent on their monthly premiums, and businesses will pay a .59 percent surcharge. The budget allocates $2.6 million for HealthSource RI going into FY 2016. There is also no more additional surcharge for outpatient and imaging services.

Full-day kindergarten is another key provision, with the governor allocating $1.4 million from general revenue to fund programs in the seven communities that don’t offer full-day kindergarten yet. Educational aid was increased by $35.8 million in order to pour money into the educational funding formula. There was also $20 million added for school construction purposes.

Higher education saw an increase of $7 million. The Rhode Island Higher Education Assistance Authority is being downsized, with its responsibilities now being transferred to the Council of Post Secondary Education and the Office of the General Treasurer.

Other major provisions within the bill include cuts to all eight local tourism bureaus, a $2 million increase for RIPTA, and a $0.25 increase in the state sales tax on cigarettes, bringing it up to $3.75 per pack. The tax increase is estimated to bring in $1.7 million in revenue.

What is absent from the budget is just as significant as what is present.

“This budget does not contain anything whatsoever to do with a proposal for a stadium, or any tolls on trucks as proposed by the governor,” Gallison said during the hearing. Also notably absent is the “Taylor Swift tax” on million dollar homes in the state.

Speaker of the House Nicholas Mattiello has gone on the record saying that the proposed budget is business friendly, and will allow for economic development in the state.

“The budget that’s going to be voted on tonight is very pro-business, pro-economy. It’s going to serve as a catalyst for existing businesses as well as working to attract new businesses to the state of Rhode Island,” he told members of the media on Tuesday.

Gallison agreed with that sentiment, giving his own statement at the beginning of the hearing.

“We continue to move Rhode Island onto an economic path to enable businesses to continue to grow,” he said.

The bill is scheduled to go to the House of Representatives floor next Tuesday.

House Finance considers state budget bill today


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Everyone’s eyes are on the State House as the budget for the next fiscal year is slated to be unveiled today. Governor Gina Raimondo released her proposed budget in March, and the legislative version will be introduced by the House Finance Committee today.

Senate President Paiva Weed and House Speaker Mattiello. Photo by Steve Klamkin, WPRO News
Senate President Paiva Weed and House Speaker Mattiello. (Photo by Steve Klamkin, WPRO)

Based on what Speaker of the House Nicholas Mattiello (D-District 15), Senate President Teresa Paiva Weed (D-District 13), and Governor Raimondo have told media in recent weeks, a few things can be expected for the bill.

Raimondo’s tractor-trailer toll proposal will not be part of House budget proposal (at least not initially) but her Medicaid cuts will. Both Mattiello and President Paiva Weed have said that they have too many unanswered questions concerning the tolls for it to be implemented now. But, a special fall session to consider them is not out of the question.

Mattiello’s tax breaks on social security income will also be a key point of the budget. As it stands in Raimondo’s proposed budget, those who file as individuals with an income up to $50,000 are exempt from the income tax on their social security, and those who file jointly are exempt on incomes up to $60,000.

HealthSource RI will remain for another two years, with surcharges on individual’s monthly premiums averaging out at 2.86 percent, and .059 on small business’s monthly premiums.

Plans for economic development have also been interspersed throughout the bill, thanks to Raimondo’s proposed “jobs package.” Parts of this package includes tax breaks for businesses within the state, as well as a reallocation of taxes on hotels for tourism purposes. How the taxes are allocated is dependent on which one of Rhode Island’s 8 tourism districts the hotel is located in.

Money is also being allocated to the state’s environment, thanks to the Bays, Rivers, and Watersheds Fund. The language in the bill states that it will be used to “foster effective management, preservation, restoration, and monitoring of the bays, rivers, and watersheds.”

Higher education is seeing some changes as well. The “Best and Brightest” scholarship fund has been completely axed from the budget; the program gave scholarships to high school students going into college with hopes that they will stay in Rhode Island to teach in the public school system. The legislature also changes how students receive financial aid for college, giving more power to the office of the commissioner of postsecondary education, and creating a general allocation fund for higher education grants.

Reinventing Medicaid should be about values, not dollars


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
DSC_1629
Elizabeth Roberts

Near the end of the public commentary period of the Reinventing Medicaid Town Hall Meeting held in Providence, Bonnie Holder observed that, “The measure of a society is based on how we treat our most vulnerable… How did we ever get to the point where we accept it as a society where 1 percent of the population can have enormous wealth and the rest of us here are fighting?”

What the standing room only crowd of nearly 200 people gathered in the foyer of the Providence Community Health Center on Prairie Avenue were fighting for was the funds needed to provide care and sustenance for children, the elderly, the poor and the homeless. Governor Gina Raimondo is seeking to cut $90 million out of Medicaid, an item that takes up about a third of the budget. Because the federal government matches state medicaid spending, the total of lost dollars to medical services in our state could be nearly double that number.

A steady stream of commentators took the microphone to say that our medical system is already straining to meet the needs of our community. Wages are stagnant, demand is only going to grow, and the money needed to get the job done right is already too tight.

Undoubtedly there are savings to be had. Where those savings are to be found is a question of values and priorities. Are we going to force front line caregivers to work longer hours for less pay? Are we going to ask people to give up medical care and prescriptions that will enhance their quality of life? Or are we going to take a serious look at the salaries and compensation packages of some of the best paid CEOs in New England?

Kathy053
SEIU 1199 New England

The Town Hall in Providence was the second of four meetings. The first was held in Woonsocket on Monday night. The next one is scheduled for March 23 at the Peace Dale Library in Kingstown and the last one will be held on April 1 at the Portsmouth Fee Public Library in Portsmouth.

Stay tuned.

Former Congressman Ed Beard was the first speaker. Now a patient in a nursing home, Beard, now 74,  suffers from Parkinson’s and was confined to a wheelchair. At one point a nurse’s assistant came forward to steady his hand so that he could hold the microphone.  “I know cuts will be damaging,” he said, “Just be very cautious when you talk about the seniors. The seniors are a forgotten lot.”

“I am one of hundreds of CNAs in this state who provide personal, bedside care to elders in our nursing homes. My job is physically and emotionally demanding but highly gratifying… I am really concerned that the nursing homes are going to funding cuts again this year…”

“If we don’t have enough to help these people, to pay our nurses, what are we going to do? In our nursing homes, if we have 2 nurses for 6 patients now, what’s going to happen if we have a bunch of cuts?”

“It’s not pleasant to be poor. To wonder whether or not one will eat today, or have enough heat to heat one’s house or even to have a house to live in…”

 “If my wife went to a nursing home, in three years I would be broke. I would have to go on welfare…”

“The corrections department is actually the largest provider of behavioral healthcare in the state…”

“These are people dependent on others for 24 hour care. They cannot safely remain at home, they’re aged and frail, they may have lost their independence, many of those closest to them have died, they rely on us for everything…”

 “As a person living with mental illness and working in the mental health field, I want to stress the idea of peer support. Peer support is important to people living with mental illness… Medicaid should support peer supporters in the mental health system…”

“Permanent supportive housing is an inexpensive way to really effect some true Medicaid savings.”

“A ton of money is saved by being able to point them to either a health center or to a primary care doctor…”

“When we think about cutting some of the costs in Medicaid, home care only accounts for 5 percent of the money that is being spent…”

“Many executives make over six figures, and other executives make millions. Governor Raimondo has set an excellent example with taking a 5 percent pay cut to her salary. Perhaps our hospital and nursing home executives should do the same…”

“We have many patient cases where they cannot afford their medication, they stretch out their medication or split their pills or take their medication every other day. We then see that when these same patients become eligible for Medicaid, their compliance increases, and they become advocates in their own health care.”

“The nurses… throughout the state providing home healthcare, reimbursement rates have been frozen for eight years now…”

“I specifically want to talk about the significance of non emergency medical transportation…”

“Here’s what Medicaid pays for nursing home care: $6.30 an hour…”

“It’s just not what one does that matters, it’s how one does it. And how we choose to reform Medicare will have an impact for generations to come…”

“It’s established that the single greatest that reduces mortality among seniors is isolation…”

“More than 28,000 children in providence receive RICARE benefits…”

“I was distressed to hear about the Medicaid fund reductions. I know the federal government is making cuts…”

“I take care of children who, if there’s no nurse in the home, those parents don’t go to bed. And if there’s no nurse in the home for a couple of days, those parents cannot take care of that child…”

“If you have to increase what you provide in a healthcare setting and your dollars are being cut, there’s only a few places that money is going to come from. Labor and staff, food and medication. So if that’s what we’re looking at cutting, labor, food, staff and medication, shame on everybody in this state…”

DSC_1617DSC_1634DSC_1640DSC_1653DSC_1663DSC_1666DSC_1674DSC_1681DSC_1691DSC_1696DSC_1712DSC_1724DSC_1729DSC_1745DSC_1773

Patreon

NBC10 Wingmen: Gina Raimondo’s first budget


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

wingmen3One of the genius things about Gov. Gina Raimondo’s budget is that it seems to make people from all over the political spectrum equally pleased and disappointed with her proposal. Such seemed the case with both John Brien and I, who debated it on NBC10 Wingmen.

News, Weather and Classifieds for Southern New England

Raimondo budget: cuts to Medicaid, taxes on vacation homes


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

raimondo tanziGovernor Gina Raimondo’s proposed budget would cut funding to the poor, fully fund the state education aid formula and create new taxes on high-end second homes and rental properties. You can read her full address to the House and Senate here.

Most significantly, Raimondo seeks to cut about $91 million from Medicaid, socialized health programs for poor people, and has already appointed a high profile task force to “reinvent” the program. It costs $2.3 billion a year, but about half of that is paid for through the federal government. Raimondo has already identified about $45 million in cuts and her budget executive summary says the task force is expected to find another $46 million.

But the poor aren’t the only ones who will pay to balance the budget. So will the state’s beach culture, as she’s proposing a new tax on million dollar second homes and AirBnB-style rentals.

raimondo2

The proposal calls for what has quickly been dubbed the “Taylor Swift tax”- a property tax levied on second homes worth more than $1 million. It will raise $11.8 million in new revenue, according to this briefing.

She’s also proposing an “AirBnB tax” that would raise $7.1 million in new revenue. From the executive summary: “The budget also closes an existing loophole that exempts vacation houses and small bed and breakfasts from paying the sales and lodging taxes. Finally, the budget would apply sales and local lodging taxes to unlicensed rentals, which have increasingly become an alternative to hotels, bed and breakfasts and other licensed lodging.”

raimondo3Both these taxes will disproportionately affect the touristy areas of Rhode Island – the islands and South County. But Senate President Teresa Paiva Weed, of Newport, where untaxed vacation rentals and million dollar second homes are commonplace, didn’t seem to mind.

“I think it’s a bold and brave look across the spectrum,” Paiva Weed said. “Just as she is asking for $90 million in Medicaid savings she is also reaching out to our wealthiest citizens to also assist us in moving forward.”

Even House Speaker Nick Mattiello, who never met a tax he didn’t want to cut, gave some early – though conditional – support to the Taylor Swift tax. “It’s an interesting initiative,” he said. “It seems like something I’d be inclined to support but right now I want to look at the details of it.”

education budgetAs did her predecessor, she is fully funding the state education aid formula – for an overall increase of $34 million from the previous year.

Raimondo also called for statewide all-day kindergarten, and an end to the school construction moratorium. Through refinancing debt, she proposes a $20 million “to create a capital fund to help address school facility needs.”

According to the executive summary, “Lifting the moratorium and setting the annual construction aid appropriation at $80.0 million starting in FY 2017 will create fiscal stability with predictable funding and allows for projects to be prioritized.”

Raimondo would like to see the Earned Income Tax Credit increased from 10 to 15 percent in one or two years, depending on the early summer revenue predictions. Massachusetts Earned Income Tax Credit is 15 percent and Connecticut’s is 27.5 percent.

Her proposed budget would raise an additional $7.1 million by increase by 25 cents the tax on a pack of cigarettes.

To promote construction, Raimondo proposes, “a package of real estate tax incentives will encourage construction of job-producing projects, with a focus on development near transit hubs and historic structures. The package includes Rebuild Rhode Island tax credits, tax increment financing, and partial assistance for local tax stabilization agreements that will make investing in construction and development in Rhode Island a compelling proposition,” according to the executive summary.

raimondo ruggerioShe’s also proposing what she calls the Anchor Tax Credit. “This tax credit incentivizes our largest employers —the anchors of our economy — to attract their suppliers and affiliates to Rhode Island. These employers will benefit from proximity to their suppliers, while the state gains new jobs and develops industry clusters,” said the executive summary.

As well as a Job Creation Tax Initiative. “There is strong support in the General Assembly for a competitive tax

initiative to incentivize employers to create new jobs. The Governor will work with leaders in the General Assembly to enact a package to promote job creation in Rhode Island. Any such initiative must include rigorous accountability provisions and a requirement that the investments’ benefits outweigh their costs,” the executive summary said.

Text of Gov. Raimondo’s budget address


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Here’s a link to Governor Raimondo’s budget website and below is the text, as prepared, of her budget address to the House and Senate tonight:

raimondoSpeaker Mattiello, Senate President Paiva Weed, Members of the General Assembly, the Judiciary, the Cabinet, City and Town Leaders, and my fellow Rhode Islanders.

Good Evening. It is an honor to stand before you to address how we can work together to expand opportunities for all Rhode Islanders and create jobs.

The budget I present to you tonight is rooted in the core belief that every hardworking family deserves the chance to make it in Rhode Island. Despite starting with a nearly $200M deficit, this budget is balanced, makes significant progress towards eliminating our structural deficit, involves no broad based tax increases, and calls for significant investments in economic growth and education.

From my first conversation with Speaker Mattiello and Senate President Paiva Weed, we agreed that priority one was jumpstarting our economy and creating jobs. I couldn’t ask for better partners in this effort and I’d like to thank you both for the time and support you’ve given me these past few months.

Our biggest problem is that our state’s economic engine is out of gas – we’ve lost 80K manufacturing jobs in the last few decades and we haven’t positioned ourselves for job-creation in advanced industries with higher growth and higher wage jobs. The jobs we are creating are low wage and, as a result, our per capita income is about $47K a year compared to $57K in Massachusetts and $60K in Connecticut. We remain among the last states in the nation in employment and in job growth, and we are one of the oldest states in America because our young people are fleeing to find work elsewhere.

All most people want is the chance to earn a decent living that lets them provide for their family. Parents want the chance to give their children a better life than they themselves led.

That’s what my parents wanted. My mom is here tonight – she and my dad worked so hard to provide stability for our family.

But now, not enough Rhode Islanders have the opportunity to do the same for their children because we aren’t creating enough good jobs, and too many of the jobs we are creating don’t pay a sufficient wage.

Our weak economy contributes to our budget deficit, forcing us into the same crunch every year: not enough jobs means lower state revenue, so we make painful cuts to balance the budget. But some of those cuts have been to economic development or infrastructure, which hurt our economy more. It is time to break this downward spiral and set in motion a virtuous cycle of progress and momentum driven by economic growth.

We need to cut in areas where we are inefficient or spend too much, and then invest in economic growth. Over time, our growth will lead to even more revenue, which will allow for further investments in education, infrastructure, and an adequate safety net.

Our turnaround won’t happen overnight but we have to start immediately because Rhode Islanders are struggling right now.

A couple of weeks ago, I was at the Warwick Mall reading to kids, and a young mom told me about how she was barely scraping by.

I took my mom shopping and a man who has worked the same full time retail job for more than a decade told me that he can barely sleep because he’s worried about the fact that there’s no money in his checking account.

We need to give a boost to Rhode Islanders who are working hard and trying to provide a decent living for their family. No one who works full-time should be forced to raise their family in poverty.

That’s why I’d like to work with you to raise the minimum wage to $10.10 an hour.

We need to do more to make work pay.

This budget expands the Earned Income Tax Credit from 10% to 15% over the next two years, putting more money directly in the pockets of working Rhode Islanders. If the revenue forecasts in May improve, I’d love to see us go to 15% this year.

It also eliminates state taxes on Social Security benefits for low and middle income seniors. Social Security is a crucial source of income for these seniors, and we should help them make ends meet. Speaker Mattiello is a leader in this effort and I am pleased to work with him to make it happen.

These steps will help families live a little more comfortably. But they will also stimulate our economy, because we know these folks will spend this money in our local economy.

And as this immediate action takes hold, we must together turn our attention to taking bold steps to create opportunities for Rhode Island.

I propose a bold comprehensive jobs plan that operates in waves with the first wave being the most robust to kick start our effort. We can’t sit back and expect jobs to appear.

This budget sets us on the path to Rhode Island’s comeback by focusing on three things:

First, building the skills our students and workers need to compete in the 21st century.

Second, attracting entrepreneurs and investment.

And third, fostering innovation, including in our state government, to enhance accountability and deliver value to taxpayers.

These principles — and an unwavering focus on creating jobs and expanding opportunity — guided every decision we made in assembling this budget.

Helping people build the skills they need to succeed is one of the best investments we can make.

Since being elected, I have dedicated time every week to talk with businesses, asking them what it will take to add jobs in Rhode Island. The thing I hear most often is that they want a skilled workforce, ready to work. We need to provide people with the training so Rhode Island is a more desirable place for 21st century businesses to invest.

This budget invests in each rung of the ladder – our schools, college affordability, and skills training for adults.

This budget invests record amounts in our K-12 public schools.

This budget also commits the necessary matching funds that allow us to more than triple the number of state sponsored pre-k classrooms in Rhode Island. It’s never too early to put our youngest learners on a path to opportunity.

And we still have almost 2,000 kindergarten students who don’t have access to full-day K. My husband and I know firsthand how much our kids flourished because of all day K and every Rhode Island kid deserves the same opportunity.

Senate President Paiva Weed is passionate about this too and I’m eager to work with her and others to bring universal full day Kindergarten to every school by September 2016. This budget makes it possible.

Teachers want it. Parents want it. And our kids need it. Let’s get it done. But how are students supposed to learn if they’re in crumbling school buildings?

Too many of our children go to school each day in buildings that have outdated heating systems; that lack modern security or technology for 21st century learning; or suffer from general disrepair.

And so, the time has come to lift the current moratorium on school construction.

My budget proposes creating a new School Building Authority to partner with cities and towns to address critical renovation needs. We are seeding it with $20 million this year, and to keep it going, starting next year, we’ll create a long-term and stable source of funds for this purpose.

We’ll put our kids in better schools. And we’ll put construction crews to work, many of whom haven’t seen steady work in years.

Building skills also means making education more relevant and effective. I propose an initiative called “Prepare RI” to empower every high school student across the state who qualifies to take college courses while they’re in high school at no cost to the student. Whether you want to go to college, or start a career right after high school, we want to make your path to a degree or industry certification more affordable and more attainable.

My dad took advantage of the GI Bill and became the first person in our family to go to college. That enabled him to get a good job. One person going to college changed all of our lives. Now more than ever, higher education can be the ladder to the middle class because in today’s economy high wage jobs go to people with high skills.

But for too many a college degree is out of reach because of the cost.

So I propose restructuring our higher education grant programs to create a last-dollar scholarship that begins to tackle the unmet financial need of Rhode Island students. In its first year, this program will invest $10M in students with proven academic performance but for whom the costs of higher education might too high and prevent them from going.

I propose we do this by restructuring and consolidating redundant bureaucracies, specifically moving the Rhode Island Higher Education Assistance Authority to the Office of the Post Secondary Commissioner. These moves will enable the state to save money and fund these scholarships for Rhode Islanders. This is the right thing to do – let’s do it together.

Even with these scholarships, we know that college costs are a lot to bear. So we’re establishing a competitive student loan forgiveness program for college graduates who pursue careers in technology, engineering and design. This program will fully cover four years’ worth of student debt for over 100 high achieving graduates per year. We want to stop the brain drain and keep these talented Rhode Islanders in Rhode Island after they graduate, especially in these fields.

Everyone knows that the global economy is changing and to compete we have to provide people access to opportunities to build the skills they need to get a job now.

Soon, I will announce a new approach to workforce training where we partner with businesses to make sure we’re training people for the jobs that actually exist now. This new system won’t require additional money in the budget, but will use existing funds to help Rhode Islanders get jobs, and help businesses get the well-trained workers they need. The difference is that we will put the employer at the center so we’re training people for jobs that are in demand now.

While we are building skills we also have to cultivate conditions to make Rhode Island an attractive place to do business and add jobs.

We’ve already begun addressing our regulatory climate. We are modernizing the way we issue regulations to make sure we’re as business-friendly as possible while still protecting our quality of life, air, water, and public safety. And we’re reviewing old regulations to see what we can eliminate.

We’re clearing away burdensome underbrush in other areas, too. After examining the over 300 licensed occupations in Rhode Island, we have identified about 30 that we can eliminate immediately. Wherever possible we should remove burdensome layers of bureaucracy to promote more economic activity.

The General Assembly to its great credit, recently cut the corporate tax rate to make us more competitive. But it’s no secret that Rhode Island’s taxes remain uncompetitive in some areas. Tonight I propose building on your good work.

To reduce business’s energy costs, I am proposing that we phase-out the sales tax on energy that the state imposes on commercial users. This will provide $5.1 million in tax relief to businesses next fiscal year, and help reduce the burden of rising energy costs.

We also have some taxes that are just a nuisance on businesses and don’t raise much revenue for the state. For instance, we are one of the only states that places special taxes on imaging centers and outpatient health services. To help contain health care costs and promote job creation in the healthcare industry, I am recommending phasing out both of these surcharges over four years.

Despite all this, let’s face it, Rhode Island has developed a reputation as a tough place to do business.

So to get companies to invest and create jobs here, we need to be proactive. This is especially true because so many other states offer incentives and have much more robust economic development efforts. If we want to compete…if we want companies to add jobs here, we can’t put ourselves at such a disadvantage relative to our neighbors.

It is time for our economic development strategy to turn heads, change perceptions, and put Rhode Island back in the game. Now I know we’ve made mistakes in economic development in the past. We must learn from them and never repeat them. We must move forward.

This budget proposes investing to attract high-quality companies, and encouraging the growth of businesses already here.

We are working with the legislature to introduce competitive tax packages that encourage businesses to create well-paying jobs, particularly well-paying jobs in promising industries.

We will implement these credits with rigorous accountability provisions, and won’t spend a dollar of state money until long after the jobs have been created.

There’s so much construction booming in Boston that they say the state bird of Massachusetts is the crane. I want job-producing construction here, so we propose creating a new initiative to encourage more real estate projects. These benefits will only be provided after the buildings are built, and are modeled after similar successful programs in other states.

Small businesses are the backbone of our state, and our comeback cannot occur without ensuring they are healthy and growing. Unlike our neighboring states, Rhode Island lacks a state-backed small business loan fund. So we will create a Small Business Program and an Innovation Initiative to expand access to capital for small businesses enabling them to thrive and expand.

Also, to leverage the businesses we already have, we will implement an Anchor Tax Credit that incentivizes our large employers to attract their suppliers to Rhode Island. These employers will benefit from having more of their suppliers close by, and the state will gain new businesses and jobs. If we are going to turn our economy around, everyone has a role to play, including our largest employers.

I am also proposing a series of steps to grow our innovation economy. Since 2010, over 1 million jobs have been created in America in advanced industries marked by technology and innovation – these industries pay more and are growing faster than most. It’s time Rhode Island got its fair share of these jobs for our families.

It is not the time to be passive or timid. We’re falling behind other states, and unemployed or underemployed Rhode Island families are bearing the brunt. If we succeed in sparking a recovery and creating jobs, everything is possible. If we don’t, nothing else will matter.

Finally, we must reinvigorate state government with fresh ideas and new ways of doing things in order to get better results. This starts with an honest and ethical government that the public deserves.

A key innovation priority this year is reinventing Medicaid.

It isn’t sustainable to have a system that has the second highest cost per enrollee of any state in the nation — a cost that is 60% higher than the national average and where a small percent of the enrollees account for the vast majority of the spending.

We have an opportunity to deliver better health care services to Rhode Islanders, and to make our system more affordable at the same time. To do so, we will have to crack down on fraud and waste; improve quality and coordination of care; and make Rhode Island a leader in health innovation by paying for value not volume.

I recently learned of a story from one of our health centers of a homeless man who was in the ER once a week with substance abuse issues. The health center would treat him, but until the root cause was addressed his cost of care continued to mount.

This is why our work to address Medicaid’s structural problems will continue beyond this evening with our working group.

I realize this working group is different than the way we’ve addressed medicaid in the past, but I believe the magnitude and complexity of the challenges we face requires it. And I am grateful to the General Assembly leadership for their flexibility as we work in partnership to find solutions. We have an opportunity with all the stakeholders at the table to put in place changes that will yield savings for years to come. This budget proposes a 9 percent cut in Medicaid expansion this year.

I intend to deliver a budget amendment to more specifically identify the cost savings that the working group generates. The working group is similar to a successful effort in New York.

Our redesigned system will focus on providing a coordinated system of care that delivers better outcomes, and delivers better value for taxpayers.

It’s also long past time to modernize our antiquated personnel rules in state government.We want to recruit and reward the best people, and ensure that there are incentives in place to encourage employees to be their best.

So this budget includes a proposal to provide state government with greater flexibility in hiring and managing personnel. In addition to a more efficient government, our goal is to achieve savings this year. If the revenue estimates in May are stronger, I would ask the General Assembly to reduce this saving target. We will work collaboratively with state employees to reduce personnel costs in a way that causes the least amount of disruption, avoids significant layoffs and honors the pay increases of the most recent contract. For my part, I am going to start by cutting my own pay by 5% this year.

The General Treasurer and I are working on another innovation — the Rhode Island Infrastructure Bank — to put Rhode Islanders back to work, improve our infrastructure, and reduce our demand for energy.

The bank will create a dependable source of capital to complete energy efficiency projects. We will integrate private capital into the mix of existing state funds to ramp up the deployment of clean energy technologies, while at the same time helping to create jobs.

This infrastructure bank — along with the school building authority and full funding for the municipal road and bridge revolving fund – will put people back to work and help our localities keep property taxes stable.

Despite all of our challenges, there’s a lot to love about Rhode Island. We love our neighborhoods, places to eat and shop. We love our beaches and our bay. For my family, a weekend in the summer is never complete without a visit to Sand Hill Cove.

We need more people to experience the things we all love. For too many years, though, we haven’t maximized the effectiveness in our state-funded tourism efforts. Rather than spending the resources in one concentrated way to maximize the bang for our buck, we’ve been sprinkling state-funded tourism dollars among various tourism bureaus around the state.

The time has come to redesign how we market our wonderful state to prospective visitors.

My proposal will restructure our tourism marketing efforts by concentrating resources behind a unified statewide tourism message. I realize that this proposal will cause some initial concern among the local bureaus, and that it is a change from the way we’ve always done it, but let’s work together over the coming months to find a solution. If we do this right, we can supercharge our tourism industry and create thousands of jobs just like other states have and that our families deserve.

The fiscally responsible budget I submit tonight takes a balanced approach to solving our challenges. We started with a nearly $200 million deficit, and we closed it by focusing mainly on spending cuts.

But, we also looked for ways to generate new revenue without imposing broad-based tax increases.

I propose closing a tax loophole on certain real estate transactions. This budget also asks those among us who are most able, to pay a little more. I propose asking those who have second homes worth more than $1 million to pay a modest assessment on those homes. This new revenue source, together with certain other revenue enhancements, is enabling us to invest in creating jobs.

We also have an opportunity now to take advantage of historically low interest rates to restructure some of our outstanding debt. By more actively managing our debt, something other states have done, we will be able to make important investments in job growth to jumpstart our economy.

The funds we will generate through refinancing will not be used to plug a budget hole, but will be part of a long-term plan to jumpstart economic growth and invest in specific economic development programs outlined in the budget.

I look forward to productive discussions and working together in the weeks to come. The truth is the people of Rhode Island are counting on us to because they are struggling and are losing faith in government. They want us to work together and make the right decisions to put Rhode Island on a better path.

I know all of us here tonight are aware of these challenges and want to rise to the occasion. I am asking you to.

Be a part of the team that sparks Rhode Island’s economic comeback. Be a part of the team that restores people’s faith in government by showing that we can get things done. Be a part of the team that restores optimism and confidence in our future. This budget sets forth a path to a Rhode Island full of opportunity, where everyone who works hard has a chance. Now, I know we have a high hill to climb, but let’s start now, and climb it together.

 

Thank you.

Obama’s budget bill borrows from Sheldon’s progressive tax trifecta


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

sheldon tax packageTwo of the three tenants of Senator Sheldon Whitehouse’s progressive tax trifecta are including in President Obama’s much ballyhooed budget proposal released today.

“In addition to the Buffett Rule the President’s budget also contains some pieces from Senator Whitehouse’s Stop Tax Haven Abuse Act,” said Whitehouse spokesman Seth Larson. Whitehouse is long the sponsor of the Buffett Rule bill in the Senate, and this year he inherited the Stop Tax Haven Abuse Act from retired Senator Carl Levin of Michigan, as previously reported on RI Future.

The Senate Budget Committee, of which Whitehouse is a member, will deliberate the president’s budget bill tomorrow at 10 am.

In a statement, Whitehouse said he supports Obama’s $4 billion budget plan – and noted it not only borrows some of his tax proposals, but also that it invests in infrastructure critical for Rhode Island.

“The President’s budget would take significant steps toward a fairer tax system while also making major investments in our nation’s transportation infrastructure,” Whitehouse said in the statement. “This is particularly important in Rhode Island, where we have some of the oldest roads and bridges in America and where new construction projects could provide badly needed jobs.  I’m also glad to see that the proposed budget would implement several policies I’ve been fighting for in the Senate, including the Buffett Rule for tax fairness and an Automatic IRA program to help millions of Americans save for retirement.  From tax credits for working families to paid sick leave, the President’s budget includes many bold proposals to help middle-class families succeed.  I look forward to debating the details of these and other provisions in the Budget Committee in the weeks ahead.”

Senator Jack Reed said: “The President’s budget blueprint contains quite a bit of good news for Rhode Island that could bolster our economic prospects.  No budget is perfect, but the President has proposed some smart investments in education, infrastructure, innovation, and workforce development that could lead to accelerated job creation, higher wages, and greater economic prosperity for all.  It’s a budget geared toward helping the middle-class by closing tax loopholes for special interests and the wealthiest Americans.”

The budget bill would end sequestration, and Reed, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said: “The President’s budget reverses sequestration, both in terms of defense and domestic priorities, in a fair and balanced way that will better protect the American people and strengthen our economy,” said Reed.  “We face a number of threats around the globe.  A failure to address sequestration and adequately fund national priorities could hinder the military’s ability to carry outs its missions around the globe and weaken our economy.”

Said Congressman David Cicilline in a statement: “Today, President Obama released his proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2016 that outlines his funding priorities for the year ahead. This proposal builds on the economic progress we have made by properly focusing on the middle class and supports initiatives that create jobs, educate young people, increase access to affordable childcare, and keeps communities safe. As we continue to reduce our national deficit, the President’s plan will help balance the budget by cutting inefficient spending and ending special interest giveaways for the very wealthy. This proposal is a strong starting point for Congress to work together to produce a smart and sensible budget that reflects the priorities of working Americans, and I look forward to working with my colleagues to reach a final agreement that ensures all Americans share in our country’s growing recovery.”

Rally to support Hunger Strikers at State House last night


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Hunger Strike Rally 005
Mirjaam Parada

There was a rally at the State House last night for the Hunger Strikers urging Governor Chafee to veto the budget that features an item that would ban cities and towns in Rhode Island from raising the minimum wage, a direct attack on Providence hotel workers seeking to have a vote in November on a proposed $15 minimum wage. Shelby Maldonado,  Santa Brito, Mirjaam Parada and Yilenny Ferreras are entering Day Three of their hunger strike this morning, pending a meeting with the Governor.

Last night each of the hunger strikers addressed the crowd of over 110 supporters, except for Santa Brito, who was suffering from a headache brought on by a lack of food. The women were all seated, shaded with umbrellas and hats in the hot sun, and subsisting on water.

Defending democracy is hungry work.

Hunger Strike Rally 004
Yilenny Ferrares, Santa Brito and Shelby Maldonado

Hunger Strike Rally 006

Hunger Strike Rally 007

Hunger Strike Rally 008
Yilenny Ferreras
Hunger Strike Rally 009
Yilenny Ferreras

Hunger Strike Rally 010

Hunger Strike Rally 011
Mirjaam Parada
Hunger Strike Rally 012
Mirjaam Parada
Hunger Strike Rally 016
Santa Brito

Hunger Strike Rally 019

Hunger Strike Rally 020

Hunger Strike Rally 021

Hunger Strike Rally 022

Hunger Strike Rally 023

Hunger Strike Rally 024

Hunger Strike Rally 025

Hunger Strike Rally 026

Hunger Strike Rally 027

Hunger Strike Rally 028

Hunger Strike Rally 029

Hunger Strike Rally 030

Hunger Strike Rally 031

Hunger Strike Rally 033

Hunger Strike Rally 034

Hunger Strike Rally 035

Hunger Strike Rally 037

Hunger Strike Rally 039

Hunger Strike Rally 040

The 5 worst things in the House budget


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

RI State House 5The Rhode Island House of Representatives has put together a new budget, and there is a lot not to like.  Here are my top five:

5.   Slashing the corporate income tax from 9% to 7%.

New House Speaker Mattiello, a very conservative Democrat from Cranston, has been championing this idea ever since he rose to power.  Naturally, progressives would prefer to see these funds spent on jobs programs like infrastructure spending.  But what is perhaps most disappointing about this cut is how it hands a big break to the businesses that least need the help, not the ones that need it most.  At the federal level, we have a progressive corporate income tax, so businesses with smaller profits pay a lower rate, which helps increase competition.   But in Rhode Island, every business pays the same rate, regardless of the size of the profits.  We could change that.  We could also eliminate the $500 minimum tax, which unfairly discriminates against small, struggling businesses.  If we are going to go down the unwise road of cutting corporate income taxes, instead of spending that money on jobs, helping out small businesses would be a better way to go.

4.   Slashing the estate tax.

In Capital and the Twenty-First Century, one of the most exciting works of economic research in recent years, Thomas Piketty lays out a bleak picture of accelerating wealth inequality increasingly dominated, not by earned wealth, but by inherited wealth–a threat that strikes at the core of the American Dream.  It is not an understatement to say that this thesis has revolutionized the way the national Democratic Party looks at inequality.  Now, more than ever, the party is committed to addressing wealth inequality.  Yet in Rhode Island, where the Democratic leadership of the General Assembly tends to side with the national Republican Party on issues, we are moving in the other direction and slashing our state’s estate tax, which disproportionately affects the wealthy.

3.   Refusing to fund negotiated raises.

Former Speaker Gordon Fox was no friend to working people, but new Speaker Nick Mattiello is striking an even more aggressively anti-labor profile.  Although the Governor negotiated a modest $25 million in raises for state workers, Mattiello’s budget brazenly refuses to fund them.  The precedent this sets is chilling.

2.   Raising taxes on the poor and the middle class.

Instead of one big tax hike on working people, like the proposed Sakonnet River Bridge tolls, the Mattiello budget opts for a range of regressive tax hikes.*  The gas tax, which is very regressive, is going up.  So are the vehicle inspection fee and the good driving fee.  The property tax circuit-breaker relief program, which helps low-income Rhode Islanders, will be axed.  Repealing the 2006 income tax cuts for the rich, naturally, was off the table.

1.   Banning minimum wage increases in any city or town.

Borrowing an idea from Oklahoma’s Tea Party government, the House Democratic leadership is banning cities and towns from raising the minimum wage.  This is a not so subtle attempt to block the inspiring campaign fighting for a living wage for hotel workers in Providence.

*It is an interesting question whether these new tax hikes are more damaging than the tolls.  While they are probably more regressive, they are also probably more effective at driving environmentally and socially responsible transportation usage.

Low income RIers pay for estate tax exemption


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The budget as proposed benefits wealthy heirs at the expense of low-income Rhode Islanders, according to an Economic Progress Institute analysis of the House Finance Committee’s revenue and spending plan released late last week.

The proposed budget would increase the exemption on the estate tax from $921,655 to $1.5 million while eliminating $3.9 million in tax breaks to low and moderate income Rhode Islanders. The budget lowers the Earned Income Tax Credit and eliminates a property tax refund.

“The clear winners are a small number of wealthy taxpayers whose estates will pay less in taxes and in many cases, nothing at all starting next year,” according to this factsheet put together by EPI. “The clear losers are tens of thousands of low- and modest-income Rhode Islanders who will pay more in taxes next year. Unemployed homeowners and renters are among the biggest losers, because they will no longer qualify for property tax assistance and are not eligible for the earned income tax credit. Many of the lowest-wage workers will also be negatively impacted by the loss of the property tax refund, even with an eventual boost in the EITC.”

According to EPI, if you are a Rhode Island taxpayer who dies with a million dollars, your heirs will owe $30,555 of their inheritance to the state. The proposed budget would eliminate the estate tax for everyone who dies with less than $2 million. Those heirs would owe $35,200.

epi estate tax

On the other hand, the proposed budget would reduce the Earned Income Tax Credit overall. According to EPI: “Lawmakers are reforming the credit by reducing it to equal 10 percent of the federal EITC and making it fully refundable. This change is likely to result in larger refunds for some of the lowest-wage workers in our state, and some workers who did not receive a refund will now get to keep more of what they earn come tax time. Still, many modest-income EITC filers with relatively higher income tax liability will pay more in taxes as the credit is reduced.”

The budget plan also eliminates what is known as the “property tax circuit breaker.” This tax refund is for Rhode Islanders who earn less than $30,000 a year whose property tax rate is more than 3 percent of their household income.  40,000 renters and homeowners took advantage of this deduction last year for an average refund of $272, according to EPI.

“The $4 million being taken directly out of the pockets of low- income taxpayers is money that would have been spent right here in the Ocean State at local businesses,” said EPI Executive Director Kate Brewster. “On the other hand, high-income households don’t need to spend every dollar they have to meet their basic needs and are more likely to save their tax cut.”

Wingmen agree! Cutting sales tax better than estate tax


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

wingmenWhen it comes to reducing revenue, Justin Katz and I agree that it would be better to slash the sales tax than the estate tax exemption, in contrast to what the House Finance Committee thinks is the best course for Rhode Island.

But that’s about as close to agreeing on the proposed budget – or anything to do with government, for that matter – that we were able to reach on this week’s NBC 10 Wingmen segment.

News, Weather and Classifieds for Southern New England

 

 

Six progressive perspectives on Chafee’s State of State speech and budget


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

chafee state of stateGovernor Chafee gave, in my opinion, a great progressive State of the state speech last night. Here’s a the text of the speech and you can watch the video here. Here’s the Providence Journal, WPRI and the Associated Press‘ news coverage. And below is a random smattering of progressive opinions on Chafee’s speech and/or budget. Let us know what you thought of it in the comments section.

Senator Juan Pichardo:

I appreciated that the Governor opened his remarks by reflecting on some of the steps taken during his administration to benefit all Rhode Islanders, from his first action in office to rescind the e-verify executive order, to ensuring that all Rhode Island residents pay in-state tuition rates at our public colleges and university.

He also took time to recognize the 50th anniversary of the War on Poverty, and the alarming wealth disparity that exists, and acknowledged that education is the great equalizer. Governor Chafee has backed up is commitment to education with action, fully funding the education aid formula each year in office, including in the budget proposed today, and increasing support for higher education and the workforce training programs this Senate has strongly promoted.

While he has proposed many significant investments in the future of Rhode Island, I would have also liked to have seen more action to address the issue of housing in Rhode Island. The investments he proposed will help to provide stability for families and children, just as an investment in affordable housing would. That is why I will be proposing a $60 million bond for affordable housing this session.

.

Rep. Larry Valencia:

He gave a good speech, in that he looks more comfortable in his own skin.
He got to recount some of his successes, including marriage equality and the DMV fix.

The budget aspects of Governor’s address was a partial relief and a partial disappointment.
First, the disappointment: As a lame duck governor, I thought there would a bold proposal or two. The proposed budget is relatively vanilla: no revenue increases, no large initiatives such as the creation of an infrastructure bank or a major overhaul of the tax code.

He did mention $80 million for bridges (as a bond? I wasn’t clear on that) but our roads need help as well. He talked about $52 million for more historic tax credits, but not how he’s going to pay for that.

I would have liked to have seen at least one progressive revenue idea (perhaps combined reporting – Rep. Teresa Tanzi’s bill) incorporated, if not some version of the tax equity bills that Rep. Maria Cimini, Rep. Scott Guthrie and myself have submitted in the past to reduce income inequality. So with a structural deficit of $100 million to begin with, how does this come together? Will social services be cut to pay for these programs? [And] no codification of the state’s healthcare exchange.

The relief:

Continued funding of the education formula (an additional $38 million). Another $10 million for higher Ed to allow for tuition freezes at URI/RIC/CCRI. Additional $1.8M for workforce development.

.

Kristina Fox, Young Democrats of Rhode Island:

Lots of statements in Governor Chafee’s speech made me glad that we have a Democratic Governor: praising the repeal of E-Verify and the passage of marriage equality, stating clearly that climate change is happening and is caused by humans, proclaiming the need to invest in infrastructure and the arts, and touting our state healthcare exchange. I mean, you don’t hear Republican governors proclaiming that they’re “proud to be a state worker”! I’m especially happy to hear our Governor’s commitment to well funded public education both K-12 and higher ed. It goes without saying that being able to access a quality public education impacts young folks tremendously.

RI has a long road ahead before we’re back to good. As Governor Chafee said, we need more good jobs, we need more economic opportunity, and we need to work on these issues together. We can’t leave anyone behind. It’s now up to the General Assembly to take the inspiring words of tonight and turn them into solutions for tomorrow. I know that the Young Democrats will be helping out as much as we can. We also believe that our government plays a key role in helping all Rhode Islanders succeed!

.

Jim Ryczek, Rhode Island Coalition for the Homeless:

We are pleased that the Governor allocated $750,000 for rental vouchers for Rhode Islanders experiencing homelessness in his proposed FY 2015 budget. This will ensure that those who are currently being housed, due to last year’s funding by the General Assembly, will continue to maintain their housing. It is estimated that approximately 125 Rhode Islanders will move from homelessness to stable housing because of the leadership by the General Assembly in last year’s legislative session. It is encouraging that the Governor is proposing to continue that funding.

This is a positive step in the right direction to ensure full implementation of Opening Doors RI, the State’s Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness. We look forward to working with members of the General Assembly to move the state’s investment closer to the $3.4 million called for in the State’s plan.

Opening Doors RI outlines a plan that significantly transforms the provision of services to Rhode Islanders experiencing homelessness. Consistent with Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness, the Plan seeks to sharply decrease the numbers of people experiencing homelessness and the length of time people spend homeless.

There have been positive changes in the way we respond to homelessness in our state, as we indicated in the Opening Doors RI Report Card we released in October. Specifically, strides have been made in the areas that involve process, and the coordination of strategies to better serve Rhode Islanders experiencing homelessness.

Systems reform alone, however, cannot end homelessness. Through empirical research and evidence we know that full funding of the Plan will help the State improve its economy, realize long-term cost savings, and improve the lives of thousands of Rhode Islanders who are currently experiencing homelessness. Our state is positioned to make huge strides in addressing homelessness but at the end of the day financial investments are needed to achieve the goals in the Plan and we look forward to working with the General Assembly in the coming months on this effort.

.

Peter Hanney, Save The Bay:

Save The Bay thanks Governor Chafee for including this $75MM request in his 2014 budget. It is a big request designed to meet the state’s real need for investment in wastewater infrastructure, stormwater management, and flood prevention.  Save The Bay is especially pleased to see $20MM in funding for the RI Clean Water Finance Agency to invest in wastewater and stormwater infrastructure, and $31.5MM linked to an array programs designed to restore natural buffers along our rivers coasts, expand floodplains, conserve valuable habitat and support public enjoyment of Rhode Island’s natural resources by investing in parks and recreational facilities like Rocky Point.

We thank the Governor and look forward to working with leaders and members of the General Assembly to secure passage. Save The Bay asks for the public’s support for the Bond early by letting legislators know that investing in clean water and healthy communities is important to Rhode Island.

.

Gus Uht, Rhode Island Progressive Democrats:

Gov. Chafee’s last budget proposal was an upbeat affair, containing many initiatives for improvements. While there are a number of good points about this budget (see disclaimer below), I am concerned that most additional support for the disadvantaged, if any, may come from ‘trickle-down’ mechanisms.

One good initiative is skills-training, to address RI’s “skills-gap”. FYI: there are a large number of job openings in RI, but few of the unemployed have the right qualifications (skills) to fill them, hence “skills-training.”

Exactly why companies can no longer provide on-the-job-training on their own dime is a mystery. Yes, it costs, but there’s a big payback. Maybe this is just today’s norm of short-term economic thinking. Also, if someone else will pay for it (the state), why not? Looks like a handout to industry, but it does have a large silver-lining.

What is not clear is where the budget cuts are coming from to fund the initiatives. According to Projo there are a multitude of them spread throughout the budget.

To be seen; it will take all of us a while to plow through the proposed budget, available here. (Warning: it is not exactly light-reading; the ‘Summary’ is 244 pages long.) As far as I could tell, the budget was only posted on the web during/right after the Governor’s speech.

Here’s to a good, a REALLY good, legislative session! (Hope springs eternal.)

[Disclaimer: the top bond issue proposed is to raze and rebuild most of the College of Engineering at URI. I’m on the faculty of the College. (Believe me, the College plant needs rebuilding.)]

 

David Cicilline: A path forward


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

cicilline msnbcMore than two weeks into the federal government shutdown, the American people have every right to be mad as hell at Congress.

When it works the way our Founders designed it, the American model of government is the envy of the world. But right now we are at a standstill because Republicans and Democrats have failed to cooperate in order to get things done for our country.

The cause of the current dysfunction in Washington is some combination of the disproportionate power of a small group of ideological intransigents called the tea party, a broken campaign finance system made worse by Citizens United and the influence of corporate and anonymous spending in our elections, gerrymandered congressional districts that undermine any chance of bi-partisanship, and the unwillingness to confront, in a serious way, our nation’s debt.

As a result, Head Start, the Small Business Administration, and the Veterans Administration have been forced to suspend some or all of their operations. Hundreds of thousands of government workers have been told to stay home – they don’t know when they’re going to get their next paycheck. And while Washington politicians are using this crisis to score political points, the federal government shutdown is hurting families in cities and towns across Rhode Island and all over the United States.

Even as both sides have traded political barbs in recent days and argued forcefully on the cause of the government shutdown, we have yet to hear a clear path forward out of this mess that would be acceptable to both Democrats and Republicans and advances our nation’s interests.

According to the Congressional Budget Office, mandatory spending for programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid is expected to increase $1.6 trillion over the coming decade. Anyone who is serious about protecting these programs and the benefits they provide America’s seniors, our veterans, and the disabled, can recognize that even as we preserve existing benefits, we need to make changes to the way these programs are funded in order to ensure they continue to provide for future generations as well.

And there is no question that our nation faces serious fiscal challenges across the board that demand innovative solutions from policymakers. Unfortunately, neither side has articulated a way to move beyond this current crisis in a way that enhances our long-term stability and honors our values as a nation.

The American people don’t care who is to blame for this current crisis. They are sick of hearing members of both parties sling mud and try to capitalize politically on each new crisis of the month. Instead, they want their elected officials to provide a path forward that outlines a way to get our country back on the right track and stops the current pattern of lurching from crisis to crisis without a long-term vision for our nation’s success.

That’s why Congress should immediately end this crisis by passing a clean continuing resolution to fund the entire government and raise the debt ceiling, both for a period of 90 days and then commit to an expedited negotiation process so that we can thoughtfully develop a commonsense, long-term strategy for growing jobs, responsibly reducing our deficit, investing in educational opportunities, and strengthening the guarantees of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.

Our leaders, on both sides of the aisle, should agree to travel to a place like Camp David or Independence Hall in Philadelphia, in a summit-like setting, and remain there until they hammer out a reasonable compromise — a good reminder of the greatness of our country and the genius of our founders.

And while these goals may seem difficult in today’s political climate, they are certainly not without precedent. Franklin Delano Roosevelt, whose legacy endures with modern-day progressives, clashed often with Congressional Republicans who opposed his agenda, but when he asked for a vote on the Social Security Act, Republicans in the House voted 77-18 in favor of his historic proposal.

Ronald Reagan, who is still revered as an icon by conservatives today, worked regularly with Speaker of the House Tip O’Neill to get work done on taxes, Social Security, and infrastructure investments. There is no reason that Republicans and Democrats today should not be able to work in a similar way to find common ground and develop a long-term strategy that creates jobs, strengthens our economic outlook, and cuts the deficit in a responsible way that honors our values as a nation.

After more than a week of an unnecessary federal government shutdown, it’s time for both parties to focus again on making good public policy decisions for the hardworking Americans who sent us to Washington.

Why the budget process was different this year


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

state house francis st lawnLast week’s budget debate in the House was inspiring, although the horse-trading and the outcome were disappointing. Normally the budget sails through the House; no one wants to risk the wrath of the House leadership by opposing it. It really takes guts to go against the grain; those doing so risk the loss of significant committee memberships, sponsored legislation, etc.

This year was different.

In total, 20 representatives voted against the budget, almost enough to defeat it (the vote was 52Y-20N-3NotVoting; 2/3 are needed for passage). Reps. Chippendale, MacBeth, O’Grady, Tanzi, Tomasso, Valencia and many others voted ‘nay’; look here for the complete voting record. [Disclosure: I ran against Rep. MacBeth in 2012.]  Possible backlash from the leadership includes the sinking of Valencia’s voter ID bill.

Also on the less-than-inspiring side there was still significant back-room horse-trading going on. It looked like there were enough votes to kill the budget two days before debate began. However, things then started to change. Leadership started to throw goodies to representatives in exchange for their votes.

In particular, note that tolling on the new Sakonnet bridge is now supposed to be postponed for months, mainly at the behest of East Bay and Northern Aquidneck representatives. The toll for a typical commuter was to be $0.75 one-way; this is much less than a $2.00 RIPTA bus ticket on any route. And for this alleged-deal a bad budget for the whole state passed the House. (There are other arguments both for and against the tolling.)

There were good speeches on both sides of the most-discussed issue, 38 Studios bonds repayment; most of the well-known pros and cons were discussed, and then some. There were other good reasons given for ‘nay’ votes, including built in structural deficits in succeeding budgets and inadequate contributions to the state pension fund in the case of lower than projected investment returns.

Other problems with this and other recent budgets: cuts are made on the backs of those voters least able to absorb them; RIPTA is inadequately funded; and little is provided to fix and maintain the state’s decrepit infrastructure. Rhode Island needs more revenue, spelled: “t-a-x-e-s.” There were two bills this year which would have partially-reversed the tax reductions for the wealthy that were granted over the last 15 years; the reductions hurt our economy, they didn’t help it.

While this year’s budget got some serious attention at the very end of the session, the public and most of the House still had little to say about it; it was business as usual. The House budget proposal should really be presented weeks if not months before the session’s end.

Probably the worst characteristic of the budget this year has little to do with 38 Studios or tolling: Rhode Island still does not have a credible policy to fix its economy.

Roads, bridges sacrifice for pensions; income taxes spared


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
State House Dome from North Main Street

State House Dome from North Main StreetRhode Island boasts some of the worst roads and bridges and one the highest unfunded pension liabilities in the nation. So of course when it came time to figure out how to make a payment to the pension system, the legislature took the money from a brand new plan to repair roads and bridges. The only other option would have been to tweak the state income tax structure – the most regressive in New England.

All three have obvious effects on the Ocean State’s economy. But while income taxes remain sacrosanct, roads and pensions made sacrifices for one another. At least CNBC doesn’t factor traffic congestion into its best/worst states for business lists!!

At least a reasonable argument can be made for austerity, though. The most contentious debate of Day 2 of the House of Representatives budget session was whether to include $2.5 million in the $8.2 million budget for 38 Studios bondholders.

Either this was a ridiculous thing to debate at the 11th hour, or it was being used as a political tool against House Speaker Gordon Fox. Perhaps both!

I just can’t conceive of a sound argument for not funding something that could damage our ability to borrow money when worst case scenario is it costs every Rhode Island $2.50 (or just the richest among us $250 each!) to effectively buy an insurance policy against a downgrade. If we don’t need it, we can always put that money into roads and bridges or the unfunded pension liability. Though some may prefer to just set up a slush fund the 1%…

But the gold star for ineffective government on Smith Hill last night has to go to the Senate Finance Committee. The Providence Journal said it too the committee only 18 minutes to rubber stamp the budget bill the House debated for almost 20 hours.

To which conservative pundit Andrew Morse tweeted: “They should try finding extra funding by zeroing out the Senate budget, and seeing if the Senate actually notices.”

 

Not including it would have meant a potential increase in cost of borrowing money, while in

 


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387