Mass, Conn have already acted; is RI finally ready to tackle climate change?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

art handy memeThe newest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report was released today, and it isn’t pretty.

The Guardian summarized it well, saying

“The report from the UN’s intergovernmental panel on climate change concluded that climate change was already having effects in real time – melting sea ice and thawing permafrost in the Arctic, killing off coral reefs in the oceans, and leading to heat waves, heavy rains and mega-disasters.

And the worst was yet to come. Climate change posed a threat to global food stocks, and to human security, the blockbuster report said.

‘Nobody on this planet is going to be untouched by the impacts of climate change,’ said Rajendra Pachauri, chair of the IPCC.

Monday’s report was the most sobering so far from the UN climate panel and, scientists said, the most definitive. The report – a three year joint effort by more than 300 scientists – grew to 2,600 pages and 32 volumes.”

The bottom line is that nowhere near enough action has been taken to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions, and the urgency to do something increases with each passing day. Rhode Island can be considered among those that have failed to act, but that could change this year.

While Massachusetts and Connecticut passed comprehensive climate change legislation over 5 years ago, Representative Art Handy’s Climate Solutions Acts have consistently fallen flat at the State House. This year Handy, who chairs the House Environment and Natural Resources Committee, has taken a new approach.

His Resilient Rhode Island Act of 2014 keeps the same ambitious goals for mitigating RI carbon emissions and adds new provisions for climate adaptation, helping the State’s cities and towns coordinate in preparing for rising sea levels, increasing flooding, and more extreme weather events. By adding the adaptation piece, Handy hopes to build a stronger coalition of support behind the effort, as storms like Sandy and the floods of 2010 have convinced businesses, officials and residents alike that we need to be more prepared.

Considerable momentum has already been generated for getting this bill passed. The Coastal Resources Management Council has been conducting outreach around its Beach Special Area Management Plan (SAMP), Governor Chafee recently created the Executive Climate Change Council, the fantastic Waves of Change website was released, and Senator Whitehouse’s continued campaigning at the federal level is being heard here. The Resilient RI Act even has its own information filled website. Additionally, Brown University is devoting resources to the effort, and it is Sierra Club RI’s number one priority.

In fact, I started a petition in support of the bill yesterday that already has close to 150 signatures on it, and I invite you to be a part of creating even more momentum on Smith Hill. CLICK AND SIGN

Time is of the essence. The Resilient Rhode Island Act is going to be heard this Thursday in Handy’s committee. If you can, I urge you to come out and voice your support. The IPCC report and our own senses demand this urgency.

If we had had the wisdom to pass such legislation twenty years ago when the science supporting it was already demanding such action, we would not have suffered so badly from Sandy’s glancing blow, and we would have created the framework for building a clean energy economy that would have meant thousands of good paying jobs. Better late than never, right? Just ask Sheldon:

If self-congratulation could save the Earth


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Yesterday, March 12, 2014, the sponsors of Senate Bill 2690 held a hearing on their bill which has the following summary:

An Act Relating To Public Utilities And Carriers – The Distributed Generation Growth Program (would Create A Tariff-based Renewable Energy Distributed Generation Financing Program.)

The discussion left me in the state of bewilderment I anticipated. Self-congratulation and lots of words, but a near-total absence of substance.  Why this frustration, you might wonder. Let me explain.

Windmills-Kinderdijk-Netherlands

Here is a quote from the report of the hearing in the Providence Journal:

They [renewable energy developers and environmental advocates] said that proposed legislation to extend the life of what was originally created as a pilot program and increase its size would not only boost the state’s economy by creating clean energy jobs but would also help the environment by reducing the carbon emissions that contribute to climate change.

“Reducing the carbon emissions!”  That should be good news for me and my friends of Fossil Free RI, who were well represented among the those who testified. Good news? Well, maybe. Let me mention that my testimony was in line with the views of  AFSC-SENE.  Of course, I am really shocked, shocked, shocked that none of my profound thoughts made into the ProJo report.  Here is the testimony I submitted for the record:

The DG bill is for a program to provide 160MW nameplate capacity over five years. What does this mean?

Power consumption per capita in the US is 1.5kW.  That is 1.5 GW for RI.

This five-year program will replace nominally 10% of RI Electric electric power: 2% per year.

The actual power is about 20% of nameplate power. That gets us to 0.4% per year.

Take into account that RI per capita power use is 60% of the national average and that electric power makes up for about 40% of our energy consumption.

Conclusion: the DG program will make a yearly change of 0.3% in our power consumption.

To prevent catastrophic climate change, we have to cut our carbon dioxide emissions by about 10% per year. In other words, to do what needs to be done, this program should be expanded by a factor of roughly 30; that might be “only” 20, if the “20% of nameplate power” is too conservative.

If the fossil fuel industry were to put in place a decoy program to guarantee their continued business as usual, it might look like this program.

This bill needs the following amendments:

  • A provision that power generation as a public utility be publicly owned and cooperatively operated.  The People of Rhode Island are fed up depending for power on National Grid, a corporation headquartered in the United Kingdom.
  • There will have to be:
    • occupational safety protections for the workers doing e.g. roof top installation and maintenance and
    • occupational injury benefits and retirement programs

By all means, please amend and adopt this bill, as long as you realize that it dramatically fails to accomplish what the physics of climate change demands.

This bill was probably formulated by people who may know exactly what they are doing. Whether that is good or bad remains to be seen, but the decisions are made by people who seem totally oblivious how many injuries and fatalities their plans may make and what   to do about these consequences. Nor did they seem to know whether they are talking about a 0.1% 1%, or 10% fractional solution of our share of the climate change problem.

Can anyone expect this process to produce rational decisions?  Of course not, all we’ll get is just more bloody capitalism!  Is it a surprise that the People have no confidence in their representatives and increasingly tune out of the fact-free reporting perpetrated by the corporate media complex?