South Kingstown biology teacher Jeff Johnson challenges Langevin


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

jeff-johnsonJeff Johnson was my high school biology teacher at South Kingstown High School. Students like me know him as the teacher who consistently dresses poorly and reads poetry out loud for fun. In many ways, he lives a life of absolutes. His desk is eternally messy; his glasses are always missing. His vocabulary and control over language are often awe-inspiring; his typing speed, not so much. He is universally loved by his students. He is fiercely intelligent and curious. But most importantly, he is so incredibly caring, not only to his students and to his family but also to our planet and to all its citizens.

Mr. Johnson has spent the past three decades fighting for the people and the issues politicians don’t care to talk about. Since the 1970s, Mr. Johnson has been engaged in the fight against climate change, and in March 2016, he helped organize a Climate March in South Kingstown. In the late 1990s, Mr. Johnson became heavily involved in the protests against the inhumanity of the American sanctions on Iraq which killed an estimated 500,000 children. Opposed to the Iraq War from the beginning, Mr. Johnson, alongside thousands of people, participated in the Iraq War demonstration in NYC on February 15, 2003. Over the years, Mr. Johnson has brought to the high school activists like Ralph Nader and the late Howard Zinn to speak on issues ranging from climate change to perpetual war.

But even with all of these things going on, Mr. Johnson always finds time to help his students. When I was at the high school, Mr. Johnson was always helping someone after school, whether it was with biology concepts, family problems, writing an essay or a science fair project. These conversations would go well into the afternoon, sometimes into the night. And it was one of these late afternoon conversations that sparked the idea for this campaign.

Today, his campaign is run by the volunteer work of a dozen of his students (current and former). We have spent countless hours working on a campaign platform (available online) that covers everything from agricultural policy to social security reform. We have been kicked out of libraries while collecting signatures outside. We have marched through torrential rain holding deteriorating cardboard box anti-war signs in our arms. We have designed a bumper stickers and yard signs, brochures and a website. We do this because we have talked to Mr. Johnson; we have gotten to know what a passionate man he is; and we really believe that he has the ability to affect change, meaningful change, where Mr. Langevin hasn’t in his decade and a half.

To Mr. Johnson, and perhaps to his campaign’s detriment, the election isn’t just about winning and a job in Congress— it is about his students. “The reason why I got into politics was because I was always talking about issues like climate change, but if all you do is talk about them, all you do is depress kids,” he told me earlier today in his classroom, “I felt like I had to do more than a hollow, academic exercise. It had to be a tangible part of my life. I was tired of feeling guilty.” This same feeling motivated Mr. Johnson to run in 1994, 1998 and then again in 2000 for statewide office. In 1994, Mr. Johnson ran for Lieutenant Governor as a Green, receiving about 6% of the vote. To date, no statewide election has matched that vote share result for a Green candidate.

Mr. Johnson is a candidate who will not represent corporate greed and war. He will never take money, as Mr. Langevin has, from defense contractors: General Dynamics, Raytheon and Northrup Grumman. He will not be passive as climate change ravages our world— he will be practicing civil disobedience with the activists— he will be getting arrested on the streets so that people will pay attention. Mr. Johnson is a person who understands the plight of the “American dream” and the American worker. He was the first person in his family to graduate from college, and today, he holds four degrees. He has worked as a submarine welder, a quahogger, a farmer, a prison dishwasher, a medical technician, a Ford assembly line operator, a gas station mechanic, a painter, a landscaper, a book editor and a paperboy. Nowadays, in addition to the high school, he commutes to Providence to work in DCYF group homes on weekends. Private sector, public sector, white collar, blue collar, Mr. Johnson has seen it all. He has seen for himself the struggle and hardship Americans must face every day.

This election season, we hang on the precipice. We must think carefully about whether we want to maintain this status quo of wage stagnation and environmental degradation. We must be open to alternatives, no matter our political affiliation or views. And more than anything, we must courageously vote our conscience after we have given all candidates a fair assessment. Mr. Johnson, I believe, offers alternatives to our status quo, alternatives that will leave a healthy planet for future generations, alternatives that will heal our economic system so that it is more equitable and fair for both the American people and those abroad.

If you want to read more about our campaign and our views, please visit out website. And check out our Facebook page!

Langevin and Hamilton have surface similarities but deeper differences


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
hamilton
John Hamilton

In many ways, Congressman Jim Langevin and upstart progressive challenger John Hamilton have a lot in common even as they compete in the Democratic primary for the second congressional district seat.

For example, they both think Langevin is a strong favorite to win.

“It’s an uphill battle,” Hamilton said. “He has a lot of money and he’s the incumbent. All the advantages go to the incumbent.”

Langevin said, “I’m hopeful and optimistic about it. I feel good about the race, but never overconfident.”

And both describe themselves as being progressive.

“I’m a progressive from way back,” Hamilton said, “which used to be known as a liberal.”

Langevin said, “If you look at my voting record I think I have a very progressive voting record.”

On policy matters, too, Langevin and Hamilton agree more often than they disagree. Both cited income inequality as the biggest issue facing America.

“To my view concentrated wealth at the top is the problem,” said Hamilton.

Jim Langevin
Jim Langevin

Langevin said, “We talk about fighting for a living wage and closing the income gap and trying to create an economic system that the vast majority of American families would benefit under, as opposed to the 1 percent, I’m a pretty consistent vote on all of those things.”

It’s the subtle differences in their responses that shows why Hamilton is challenging Langevin, despite conceding that “we’re both pretty good” when asked where the two candidates find agreement.

“I’m seeking to be a change agent in this election,” said Hamilton, who was inspired to run for congress by Bernie Sanders.

Langevin, the eight-term Democrat first elected in 2000, said, “It is my job to reflect the views of my constituents, the people I represent, and I hope I’ve been doing that effectively.”

Both are voting for Hillary Clinton in November, but Langevin is an avid supporter of hers and Hamilton, who served two terms in the state legislature in the early 1980’s, more reluctantly. He says he returned to politics only because “both parties are taking a wrong direction.” For 30 years, less-than-liberal Democrats helped Republicans and corporations ruin the American middle class, according to Hamilton.

“The Democratic Party took a wrong direction in the 1990’s,” he said. “We had the golden years of economics in America … and what happened? Well, we started cutting taxes for the very wealthy – the billionaires, the millionaires and the corporations – so we had less revenue to reinvest in our country. Then we started doing these trade agreements … and then we deregulated the banks, we did away with Glass Steagall, which was an important separation of investment and regular banking. I call those the triad of middle class destruction. We had job sucking trade agreements, we had bank deregulation and we had the trickle down economics and taxation that started with Reagan and then later in the Clinton era.”

On these finer points, Langevin and Hamilton only partially agree.

Both candidates oppose trade deals, in general, and the Trans Pacific Partnership, in particular. But there is a concerted difference in their words.

“I see TPP as nothing more than a corporate takeover of America and I consider anyone who votes for TPP to be voting against the United States of America,” Hamilton said.

Langevin was more measured, saying, “I’m not a supporter of that right now. I’m waiting to see what is going to be negotiated in terms of an agreement. I have not been impressed with many of the trade agreements in the past, including NAFTA, that have worked well for other countries, it seems, and corporations but hasn’t benefited American workers or American companies as much as it has overseas companies.”

They have stronger differences on reinstating the Glass Steagall, which historically prevented lending banks from also being investment banks but was repealed in 1999. It is a favorite policy prescription of  many progressives looking to reign in Wall Street..

“Not that I’m opposed to reinstalling the provisions of Glass-Steagall,” Langevin said, “but the Consumer Protection Division that we just created, I do want to give that a chance to work to see if that could be more effective.”

Both said gun safety and gender equality are important areas for Congress to act on next session. Hamilton is solidly pro choice and Langevin more pro life when it comes to abortion, but it’s hard to imagine legislation that would divide them as Langevin often votes against anti-abortion bills sponsored by Republicans. Langevin voted with Republicans last session on a bill that would have made it more difficult for Syrian refugees to come to the United States and Hamilton criticized him for it. But, for the most part, if Republicans control the House of Representatives again, which Langevin said seems likely, he and Hamilton would probably often vote the same way.

But there are big differences between Langevin’s style and Hamilton’s – and nowhere is that difference more acute than in their approaches to the proposed Burrillville power plant.

“That plant is not needed in Burrillville,” Hamilton said. “If there is any politician who hasn’t come out against it and stood with them against this power plant, they need to send that message that they are never getting their vote again.”

Langevin isn’t taking a position on the issue.

“I think everyone recognizes that we have to do more to meet our state’s energy needs and help bring down the cost of energy and some feel that the Burrillville power plant is something that will help in that area but we also have to mindful of the environmental impacts,” he said. “That’s why I support the whole process and fact finding that’s happening right now. Although it’s not a federal issue, it’s local and state, I’m certainly monitoring the issue very closely.”

Hamilton, whose first political awakening came when protesting against a proposed nuclear power plant in Charlestown in the 1970’s, called Langevin’s hands-off approach “unacceptable.” Remembering how they stopped the proposed nuclear power plant from being developed where Ninigret National Wildlife Refuge is today, he said, “John Chafee and Claiborne Pell did not remain neutral on the Charlestown nuclear power plant.”

Langevin, Reis at odds on Iraq, minimum wage, Ebola, term limits


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

langevinriesCongressman Jim Langevin, the Democratic incumbent in the second congressional district, and his Republican challenger Rhue Reis disagree on a terms limits and boots on the ground in Iraq during their NBC 10 News Conference debate.

(You can watch the David Cicilline v. Cormick Lynch CD1 debate here)

News, Weather and Classifieds for Southern New England

In the second segment, Langevin and Reis disagree on the minimum wage. Langevin says he’s open to lowering the corporate tax rate, but would like to see other reforms as well. Reis says Rhode Island doesn’t need to increase workforce training.

News, Weather and Classifieds for Southern New England

RI GOP’s Rob Paquin and I discuss:

News, Weather and Classifieds for Southern New England

Debate Confirms: Collins Best Congress Candidate


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Following Abel Collins’ televised debate last Friday, where he clearly bested both Rep. James Langevin and GOP challenger Michael Riley, it’s more apparent than ever that Collins is the best candidate for progressives—perhaps the only candidate—in the 2nd Congressional District. He’s a genuine peace and environmental advocate who’s determined to get big money out of congressional politics. His election to Congress would be good news for those who love peace, and those who long for democracy in America.

In a first for Greens, these qualities won Collins—an independent—the Green Party’s endorsement at its state committee meeting in August. A statement at the time called Collins Rhode Island’s best choice for Congress, saying he’d be a “strong, clear voice, for the people and the planet.”

“Of course it’s possible to challenge the two-party system,” Collins declared. “What’s not possible is to sustain the unsustainable, to make more fossil fuels, or create a peaceful society when people are motivated by fear, and not by love.” After his endorsement, Collins told the Greens he is “proud to be the peace candidate in the race, and proud to have the endorsement of the Green Party.”

After Collins’ strong performance in this week’s debate, a lot more Rhode Islanders will give his campaign a second look. If enough voters were tuned in, Abel’s progressive campaign is going to do very well on Tuesday.

Tony Affigne is state committee chair for the Green Party of Rhode Island. Visit the Greens at www.RIGreens.org

Dems Unite Around GOP Smear Campaigns


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Brendan Doherty demonstrating uncommon integrity

I’m glad the Rhode Island Democratic party is finally coming together to renounce the incredibly negative campaigning the Republicans have been resorting to. Let’s hope the media picks up on this story.

In my biased opinion, it’s the biggest meta-narrative of the local campaign this year, but I think it has a lot of merit for my brothers and sisters in the unbiased side of the industry as well.

Today at 1pm at Slater Mill all the Democratic heavyweights in the state – Sheldon, Jack Reed, Cicilline, Elizabeth Roberts, Gina Raimondo, Mayor Taveras and Ed Pacheco, among others (Langevin will be taping the WJAR debate) to call upon their Republican counterparts to stop slinging mud and start talking about issues.

It seems like every day either Brendan Doherty, Barry Hinckley or their operatives release a new dirty and misleading advertisement. Hinckley was just given a Pants on Fire by Politifact today for an untrue ad. Doherty’s ads make a pants on fire rating seem like a gold star though. They have literally been among the most atrocious I’ve ever seen. AP writer Michelle Smith does a nice job of summing up the ad here. She writes:

House Republicans are airing a TV ad in Rhode Island linking freshman Democratic Rep. David Cicilline to a child molester and a murderer he defended when he was a lawyer two decades ago.

A Doherty spokesman told Ian Donnis of RIPR earlier in the week that the campaign decided to go negative because Cicilline did first. Tim White chided Doherty when he offered this same flawed logic during a WPRI debate, saying, “you’re basically saying he started it.”

I think it’s laughable that Brendan Doherty calls himself a man of uncommon integrity and then runs this kind of dirty campaign. There’s no reason unbiased political reporters shouldn’t be calling out a candidate for such an obvious contradiction.

This kind of gutter campaigning isn’t good for anybody and Republicans should be held accountable for resorting to such dirty tactics. But, I suppose if they had a message that would resonate with Rhode Islanders, they’d be ringing that bell instead.

Abel Collins for Congress


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

For progressives living in the Second Congressional District, there’s no tougher choice on this year’s ballot than deciding whom to vote for in the race between Jim Langevin and Abel Collins. Both are sufficiently liberal to warrant your support, but they represent opposite extremes of the left side of the of the state’s political spectrum, and would bring very different attributes to the office.

Langevin would continue the consistent and competent job he has done representing Rhode Islanders while Collins would instantly be among the most liberal members of Congress. Both have their benefits.

Langevin will continue to amass clout in the Congress, and by and large he’s done well by progressive Rhode Islanders.

On economic matters, which are of the utmost importance this election, he’s proven almost, but not quite, as progressive in his voting record as either Senator Sheldon Whitehouse or Congressman David Cicilline – the standard bearers for representing Rhode Island’s liberal base inside the beltway.

On social issues, Langevin has moved left during his tenure in Congress, and I’ve got a lot of respect for politicians who are open-minded enough to evolve. He’s a practicing Catholic who has done a great job of standing up the bully tactics of Bishop Tobin, and I’ve got a lot of respect for that too.

Langevin now believes all couples should be able to marry, which wasn’t always the case. While he’s anti-choice on abortion issues, it’s hard to argue with his very personal reasons – because of the accident that left him wheel chair-bound since he was 16, he wouldn’t wan to deprive anyone of a chance at life. Besides … given how far to right the House has shifted on social issues, Langevin can generally be counted on to vote with the good guys on the choice issues that do come up.

Collins, on the other hand, is not a compromise.

He’s what progressives should want their politicians to think like. He’d fight for a fairer tax code, and we already know from his service at the State House that transportation issues are tantamount to him. He’s also a tireless advocate for the environment, sustainability and civil liberties. These are arguably the most important issues for the country grapple with if we’re to fix our economy in a meaningful way.

His downside is he’s still a little politically naive, and the Collins campaign has been something short of a well-oiled machine. Some of that has to do with money, and a lot of that has to do with his lack of party support, but some of that also has to do with leadership and Collins would have done well to have learned the ropes a little better before running for U.S. Congress. My biggest beef with Abel is he could have been an effective state legislator if he would have run for a seat there this year.

Thanks in large part to Mike Riley’s lackluster campaign, I’m confident enough in a Langevin landslide to throw my humble support behind Abel Collins, but if he were running in the First District, I’m not sure I’d be writing the same thing … That said, I firmly believe it would be great thing for both Rhode Island and the progressive movement if he could pull off an upset.

Collins’ Own Email Poll Shows Different Results


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Either independent congressional candidate Abel Collins is doing better than previous polls predicted, or how well he is doing is in the eye – or methodology – of the pollster asking the question.

The Collins campaign would have you believe the former.

It released an email-based poll conducted by CCRI political science professor Eric Siegel showing Collins garnering 16.1 percent support among respondents. That’s compared with 9.2 percent in a recent WPRI poll, and 4.7 percent in a more recent Brown poll.

The email poll showed incumbent Democrat Jim Langevin with 47.6 percent, compared to 52.6 in the WPRI poll and 49.4 percent in the Brown poll. Mike Riley, the Republican, got just 22.3 percent support in the Collins poll, compared with a similarly paltry 29.1 percent in the WPRI poll and 31.5 percent in the Brown poll.

Siegel, a former Green Party committee chair whose business Aqua Opinion and Policy Research was hired to conduct the poll though he is also serving as a volunteer with the Collins campaign, said email polls better reflect the electorate than do polls that utilize landlines, like the WPRO and Brown polls.

The logic goes that those who still utilize landlines tend to skew conservative – so even if the landline-using respondent is a registered Democrat, for example, he or she may tend to be a more conservative Democrat than, say, a registered Democrat who has ditched the landline for a cell phone or Skype. However, the same logic only politically reversed should also hold true … would those who would respond to an email poll tend to skew left? My guess is yes.

In other words, in either circumstance you might get the same amount of registered Democrats (or Republicans, for that matter) responding, but they might tend to be from different ends of the spectrum of registered Democrats or Republicans or unaffiliated voters.

There’s another difference in the Collins poll. Siegel weights his responses to match the demographics of the district, whereas the other two polls call the requisite number of households until they reach a demographic sample that matches the district.

Abel Collins Responds to WPRI Debate Questions

At long last, the Abel Collins campaign sent me the YouTube code for his response to the questions posed WPRI posed to the other two CD2 candidates in the Tuesday night debate that he was excluded from.

It’s only 20 minutes long, and if you’re a voter in the Second Congressional District or a fan and/or pundit of politics (state or national, actually), it is well worth a watch. Collins may not be the most viable candidate in the race, but his ideas have great merit.

Here’s a link to WPRI’s debate, to compare and contrast.

Mean Mike Riley Demands Softballs from Dan Yorke


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Photo courtesy of 630wpro.com

Just in case, after Mike Riley berated not only Jim Langevin during the WPRI debate but also the moderators several times too, you needed any additional evidence that this guy can’t get along with anyone he gave it to you on the Dan Yorke show yesterday.

Riley actually had the audacity to berate Yorke this time, the host of the radio show he was appearing on … and he did so for, among other reasons, not asking him softball questions!

“What you really should be asking me is how is Rhode Island going to do better, that’s your job,” he said to Yorke. “My job is to make Rhode Island do better.”

Yorke was asking Riley about an inconsistency between him saying in 2010 that he didn’t believe in money in politics but this time around he clearly does as he is prepared to invest more than a million dollars running for Congress. Riley dismissed the question and called it a “gotcha” question.

The two verbally spar right from the get go, but it gets really heated at about 11:22 in the podcast – when Yorke asked him about the video we dug up of his 2010 campaign for state Senate.

Riley also offered some insight as to why he developed such nasty and untrue attack ads against Langevin.

“I was actually so naive politically as to believe that my ideas would come out through the radio station or through newspapers,” he said when asked why he changed his philosophy about money in elections, “but that actually didn’t happen. I’ve learned a lot about politics.”

He also offered a little insight into what he thinks of the press, too.

“All this side story and all this stuff you hear in the media means nothing,” he said when Yorke asked him what message he wants listeners to take away about him. “What we really need to do is get Rhode Island back on track. And what you need someone to do is get someone in there and work on the economy.”

I’m pretty sure Rhode Islanders – as well as Americans everywhere – don’t think we need Wall Street hedge fund managers like Riley doing any more work on our economy.

Collins Didn’t Debate But Showed Voters His Style

Abel Collins would have been a great addition to WPRI’s CD2 debate last night, but how he handled his exclusion also gives voters a good glimpse as to how he might govern.

He organized a fantastic grassroots effort to petition the station to change its mind and include him on the stage. He also came up with a smart idea to effectively add himself to the debate by using free internet technology to stream live his debate answers after WPRI had spent probably tens of thousands of dollars to prerecord their debate.

In Collins’ live-streamed response, he spoke mostly of doing more for the middle class, government gridlock and holding Wall Street barons, like his Republican opponent Mike Riley, accountable for the damage their industry has inflicted on the working class. So did Jim Langevin. On big picture economic issues, he and Langevin are not that all that far apart – which makes them several universes removed from Riley, who’s more akin to Ron Paul than John Chafee.

He not only talked the talk of sticking up for regular Rhode Islanders, Collins also showed he knows how to walk the walk and use people power and proletarian tools to take on corporate interests.

That said, his campaign delivered their more than 1,100 signatures to WPRI after it held the debate, which took a some air out of the rally’s sails. And his live-streamed response was at best clunky (thanks in no small part to its media partner on the project – me!). It looked, as it was, homemade (so did Riley’s campaign productions in his pre-TV days). And his staff forgot to record his response, so there is no evidence of it.

Collins is perfectly in pitch with the progressive platform, and his would be a fantastic voice for Rhode Island in Congress, but he might not be ready for prime time. His energy and ideas would have been better used on a run at a State House seat.

Collins to Participate in Debate, Via RI Future


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Congressional candidate Abel Collins will be participating in the CD2 debate tonight. Well, sort of.

The Collins campaign will either livestream their candidates responses to the debate questions immediately after WPRI’s portion ends at 8 p.m. or it will release a You Tube video of their responses to the questions later that evening. Either way, you’ll be able to watch Collins participate in the CD2 debate on RI Future.

WPRI, which made an editorial decision to exclude Collins from its debate, taped the event earlier today. Collins has a rally planned at the station today at 5:30 to deliver a petition with more than 1,100 signatures asking for him to be included.

“I am disappointed that this debate was recorded earlier today, and we we’re not given the chance to deliver our petition to station management before the debate started, but it has been clear to us that WPRI/ FOX Providence never intended to have us on the stage next to our opponents,” Collins said in an email. “We will have our say and we will make our case to the voters in Rhode Island’s Second district.”

Campaign Manager Dave Fisher added, “It gives one pause that this debate is the only one in the series that was pre-recorded. It seems that the station management knew for some time that there would be public backlash to the exclusion of Abel from this debate. This entire process has been an affront to our democratic principles.”

Fisher added, “If Langevin and Riley had any integrity whatsoever, they would have boycotted the debate.”

Langevin did say he wanted Collins to participate in the debate.

Mike Riley, Circa 2010


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Did you know this isn’t Mike Riley’s first run for public office? According to this You Tube video he made, a more hirsute Riley ran for state Senate District 36 in 2010.

In it, he says, among other things, “We need to have teachers willing to work extra days and extra hours for no more pay. But that’s just education reform. We have serious other issues here in Rhode Island, many of which aren’t outlined here and won’t be covered in this little speech.”

It’s still worth a watch though:

Here’s another video of Riley lamenting not receiving the endorsement of the Narragansett Town Republican Committee:

And here he is apparently lamenting not receiving the endorsement of Barack Obama:

And on this You Tube video about Wisconsin’s organized labor politics, he commented, “awesome…..can’t wait to meet them in the streets for some real collective bargaining.” It was flagged for being inappropriate, so it’s hard to find.

Wonder what he meant by that?

Progress Report: Even More Riley Lies; KKK History in Smithfield; Mortgage Gordian Knot; Roger Williams


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Downtown Providence from the Providence River. (Photo by Bob Plain)

First Mike Riley was telling lies about Congressman Jim Langevin in TV commercials. Now, we’re pretty certain he’s telling lies about RI Future to other reporters. Or, it’s just another example of why  Mike “McCarthyism” Riley is totally unfit to represent Rhode Island in Congress (we’ll offer more evidence of as much a little later this morning).

Read Dee DeQuattro’s post about Riley this morning and decide which you think it is.

Riley and Langevin debate, without candidate Abel Collins, on WPRI tonight at 7. The market’s leading TV news station blundered big time in not including Collins in the debate, and exacerbated the mistake by not being forthcoming with their reasoning for doing so. Journalism should err on the side of inclusion and explanation and WPRI did neither with their responsibility to host this particular congressional debate. Such decisions deserve scrutiny and ace reporters Tim White, Ted Nesi and others who work there would be demanding nothing less if the subject wasn’t their employer.

For a man who says he possesses uncommon integrity, the ProJo Politifact team sure does catch Brendan Doherty telling a lot of lies. Today, they refute his accusation that Congressman Cicilline, when mayor of Providence, “espoused a sanctuary city.” Doherty has been poltifacted six times and half of those times he wasn’t telling the truth. He was given a half-true and a mostly true and only once was he said to be telling the full truth. This from a candidate whose campaign is based around his opponent being distrustful.

Admit it, you wish you were too high-brow to pay attention to them but Dan McGowan makes great lists. Today’s list shows which RI communities have the highest rates of unemployment and it looks a lot like lists of the communities with the worst budget situations as well as public school high-stakes testing results. What does that indicate? (Hint: it isn’t the unions fault)

Thanks to Ed Fitzpatrick for joining RI Future in calling for the town of Smithfield to change the name of a local road named after a KKK leader … it seemed like a no-brainder to us, too, and we kept waiting for the rest of the state to join the call. But evidently Rhode Islanders were too busy rallying against civil liberties and looking for frightened voters in attics to care…

The mortgage crisis in Rhode Island, in case you didn’t know, is a Gordian knot – meaning untangling the mess may prove impossible without a special solution. That solution looks like it could be loan modifications.

Is True the Vote committing a criminal conspiracy by suppressing voters rights?

Disappointed with our choices for State House seats? Just be glad you don’t live in Arkansas, where candidates garner headlines like this one: Legislative Candidate Endorses Death Penalty For Rebellious Children In Book

October 9 is a pretty significant day in the history of progressive and/or radical politics:

In 1635, Rhode Island founder Roger Williams is banished from the Massachusetts Bay Colony.

In 1940, John Lennon was born.

In 1967, Che Guevara was executed in Bolivia while trying to foment revolution there.

And in 1969, the National Guard breaks up protests related to the Chicago Eight trial. They were accused of inciting violence at the 1968 DNC Convention.

More McCarthyism from Mean-Spirited Mike Riley


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Photo courtesy of 630wpro.com

As I’ve argued here, outside of being a member of a major political party, there’s no good reason why WPRI would include Mike Riley in its CD2 debate and not Abel Collins.

Unlike the ultra-conservative Riley, Collins espouses some pretty mainstream ideas. The independent wants citizens more involved in their government and corporations to be less involved. He wants to shift away from an economic policy that caters to the 1 percent to one that caters more toward the middle class.

Mike Riley, on the other hand, thinks people who believe in such policies are communists.

Tom Sgouros detailed as much in a post showing Riley’s correspondences with him when he was writing for the Narragansett Times.

But berating Sgouros isn’t the only time Riley has confused being progressive with being a communist. In July Ian Donnis quoted him as equating progressive political positions to “time-release communism.

Calling progressives communists is as narrow-minded as it is mean-spirited. And it doesn’t bode very well for Riley’s potential to work across the isle.

But don’t expect much bipartisanship from the former Wall Street hedge fund manager. He once wrote in GoLocal, “Government exists to protect and preserve our individual freedoms and property rights so that we may pursue our dreams and our happiness. Real leaders will accept this limited role of government and seek to constrain its growth and influence over our lives.”

If this reads like creepy Ayn Rand weirdness that’s because it is. Riley is the worst kind of conservative: he espouses to be a libertarian but he’s really a tool for the corporate interests.

He won’t comment to RI Future, but here’s how Congressman Jim Langevin described him.

“Michael Riley clearly plans to go to Washington to fight for the wealthiest one percent of Americans,” said the incumbent. “He’s going to Washington clearly to fight for tax advantages for major corps and oil and gas companies. He’s going down there to support the Ryan budget. and he’s going down there to turn medicare into a voucher system.”

And here’s a comment from Abel Collin’s new campaign manager Dave Fisher:

“The fact that Mike Riley has not supported the inclusion of Abel in the WPRI debate is indicative of his hardline right-wing policies that would squelch free speech and many of our other rapidly eroding freedoms in the U.S. There is only one candidate in the race that offers a real option to the baton passing between the two major parties that goes on in Washington, and that is Abel Collins. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again; the only difference between Democrats and Republicans is this: Republicans want to drive the bus toward Armageddon with the gas pedal on the floor. Democrats are willing to obey the speed limit.”

For more on Riley, listen to him on Political Roundtable this morning.

Mike Riley: Columnist Tom Sgouros Is a Communist


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
communist, I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn

I gather that Mike Riley’s campaign has decided it won’t comment to RIFuture.  I find this shocking.  Back when I had a column that appeared in the Narragansett Times, Mike Riley was one of my regular correspondents.  As I’m sure you can imagine, much of the mail I received about my column was thoughtful material, the kind of missives that make a writer stop and reconsider his positions due to the unexpected viewpoints and hitherto unknown data points contained in them.  Mike’s were no exception.

Herewith a sample of his fan mail:

Dr Mr Sgouros,
Your recent communist diatribe in the “communist times” revealed a giant gap in your knowledge of pensions and education. You couldn’t be more wrong or more communist. People like you need to be educated in some other country. Preferably Venezuela.
Michael G Riley

Dear Tom Sgouros,
I dont understand why the Narragansett Times prints any of your lunatic ravings.For a look at what a true intellectual might say and a capitalist newspaper might print ,I have attached a recent note from Brian Bishop.
Michael G Riley
Narragansett

Morning Hugo, that article on banks and hedge funds was truly pathetic

That last one is the entire note, except it also had a stirring quote from Friedrich von Hayek indicating that true freedom includes the freedom to make mistakes, even to starve.

Needless to say, his prose style and trenchant observations made him one of my treasured regular correspondents.  His notes to me always arrived addressed to “communist” so I’d know who it was from.  When he announced his run for office, he sent out an invite to join his network on LinkedIn:

communist, I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn
A note to me from Michael Riley

A second, similar, note with a somewhat more traditional salutation arrived shortly after.

One time in 2009, I found myself at an event at a bar in Narragansett that turned out to be in the same plaza as Riley’s office.  I happened to speak there with an acquaintance of his, who offered to go tell him I was in the area, and did.  Sadly, Mike was apparently too busy to come meet me, so I still have never met him in person.

So that’s Mike Riley for you: tolerant of opposing viewpoints, humble about his own, committed to reasoned discussion as the route to moving our polity forward.  I couldn’t be more sincere about my support for him.

WJAR: Collins Can Debate Depending on Poll Results


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Depending on the results of a new Brown University poll expected next week, WJAR News Director says it’s likely congressional candidate Abel Collins will be invited to debate the other two candidates for the the second congressional district seat.

“I suspect he will pass our criteria and be invited to our debate,” said WJAR Channel 10 News Director Chris Lanni. He said the criteria includes garnering at least 10 percent support in polls.

Brown University has a poll coming out next week, and Lanni said he expects Collins will meet the mark. In a WPRI poll released earlier this week, Collins 9.2 percent of respondents said they plan to vote for Collins. The poll has a 6.2 percent margin of error. Lanni said margin of error will be factored in with regard to WJAR’s analysis of the Brown poll.

“We are very transparent about our rules for being included in debates,” Lanni said, noting that the criteria was shared with all the campaigns. WPRI, on the other hand, declined to comment on why Collins was not invited to their debate.

Below is WJAR’s criteria for being included in congressional debates:

The candidate must meet all legal and Constitutional requirements for the office he/she seeks.

The office of the Secretary of State must determine the candidate is qualified for placement on the next ballot.

The candidate must be a member of a political party recognized by the state of Rhode Island or an Independent candidate who shows evidence of a credible candidacy.  Candidates who lose in the primary election cannot be included in a formal debate before the general election.

Evidence of a credible candidacy must include demonstrated fundraising ability, a structured campaign, and at least 10% support (including the full benefit of the margin of error) among all registered voters who are likely to vote, in the final poll published by Rhode Island College or Brown University, at least three weeks before the debate.  NBC 10 will not consider any other polls, for inclusion in formal debates.

Formal debates are special programs produced by NBC 10, usually involving a moderator and structured format.  Candidates are invited in writing and the format is provided to them before the debate.  Specific questions will not be provided to candidates prior to the debate.

The candidate must agree to abide by all rules concerning the format and conduct of the debate.

NBC 10 and RIC may cancel a debate in their sole journalistic discretion.

All decisions concerning this debate, including but not limited to candidate qualifications, candidate invitations and the interpretation and application of these rules, are within the sole discretion of NBC 10 and RIC and shall be final.

Candidates who would not meet the criteria for formal debates may be included in informal candidate forums on programs such as “10 News Conference” and “Political Roundtable.”

Congressman Jim Langevin said he thinks Collins should participate in debates. Republican candidate Mike Riley declined to comment.

Langevin: Collins Should be Allowed in TV Debates


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

In contrast to WPRI, Congressman Jim Langevin thinks his campaign competitor Abel Collins should be allowed to participate in the televised debates, he told me in an interview today.

“All three of us should be debating,” Langevin said. “The voters on election day are going to be confronted with three options. If they aren’t hearing from all three candidates in the debates, it deprives the voters.”

Mike Riley declined to comment on the matter. A campaign staffer said to me, “We don’t make statements to your blog.”

WPRI will hold a televised debate on Tuesday night between Langevin, the incumbent, and Republican candidate Mike Riley, who is largely financing his own campaign. Collins was not invited to participate. WPRI General Manager Jay Howell declined to comment on why Collins wasn’t invited.

Phillipe and Jorge reported last week that they believe WJAR may invite Collins after all. They wrote, “P&J have a feeling that situation may change.

Abel appeared on Channel 10’s News Conference last Sunday by himself, with both Langevin and Riley apparently standing up host Jim Taricani. Reports from those close to the event said that Our Jimmy was less than amused (read: furious), so after Collins’s solo performance, look for a quick JARhead ‘sorry your invitation got lost in the mail’ weaseling.”

Collins has started a petition drive asking WPRI to  include him in the WPRI debate.

Green Party of RI Endorses Abel Collins in CD2


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The Green Party of Rhode Island has endorsed environmentalist and public transportation advocate Abel Collins in the contest to represent the 2nd congressional district of Rhode Island.

In a press release sent out by the Green Party this morning, Collins said his is “proud to be the peace candidate in the race, and proud to have the endorsement of the Green Party.”

He added, “Of course it’s possible to challenge the two-party system,” Collins declared. “What’s not possible is to sustain the unsustainable, to make more fossil fuels, or create a peaceful society when people are motivated by fear, and not by love.”

Here’s the rest of the release from the Green Party:

At a state committee meeting in Providence, the Green Party of Rhode Island has voted to formally endorse Abel Collins, independent candidate for Congress in Rhode Island’s 2nd District.

“Abel has common sense, common decency, and a plan to bring Rhode Island into the 21st Century,” said party secretary Kathleen Rourke. “We’re proud to endorse his campaign. We urge all of our supporters in the 2nd District to vote for Abel Collins.”

Green Party leaders said they were impressed by Collins’ commitments to reform the financial system, promote fair trade, and push legislation to fight climatechange, while bringing high-paying jobs to Rhode Island in emerging green technologies. His pledge to oppose further U.S. involvement in Afghanistan, and bring all U.S. troops home, also drew enthusiastic praise from the party’s peace activists.

“Abel is without doubt the best congressional candidate Rhode Island has seen in decades,” said party chair Tony Affigne. “He’s a genuine peace candidate, and he’s absolutely determined to get big money out of congressional politics. His election would be very good news for those who love peace, and those who long for true democracy, everywhere in America. He has our complete support.”

An Independent For 1st Congressional District


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

My name is David Vogel, and on November 6, my name will be on the ballot as an Independent candidate for Congress from the First Congressional District for the State of Rhode Island.

Being raised in a New York-style Jewish household meant that, nearly by default, my upbringing would be modern liberalism with a healthy integration of old-world sensibilities; growing up in Rhode Island ensured that I would be a Democrat.

Then why am I running as an Independent?

Observing our government in action has led me to the conclusion that even for the most progressive of people, being a part of one of the two main parties is a stifling experience. If you “belong” to one side or to the other, you are expected (if not required) to do the party’s bidding; this is made worse by the mounting evidence that each of the parties is expected (if not required) to do the bidding of the industries that are throwing the most money at Congress via the process of lobbying. There is no room for overall progress because, for those to whom the word “service” is not an empty pair of syllables, the opportunity to solve problems through thought, common sense, and collaborative effort is replaced entirely by party-driven rhetoric and propaganda.

A federal government has the responsibility of acting as a steward for a nation, and is not supposed to treat its constituents as little more than a convenient resource to be exploited. As long as big money dominates politics, it is nearly delusional to believe that by simply complaining loudly enough, “We The People” somehow will get entrenched partisans to understand that something better is being demanded.

This is why, in concert with my view of what it means to be an Independent, I am not asking anyone for any money. My inherent inability to flood the airwaves with canned sound bites and vacuous platitudes means I must find some other way to get your attention. But that’s o.k., because I would rather give you a reason to like me…. it’s just how I think. I believe there are people out there who will appreciate that rather than hide from the issues or dodge their questions or ignore their concerns, I will discuss anything you like, will give you my unvarnished opinion, and will not be afraid to say to you “I don’t know enough about that issue to give you an answer at this moment, but will be happy to resume the dialogue after I perform the research necessary to educate myself appropriately.”

Our nation likes to remind itself that innovation, along with a never-say-die attitude, is an enormous source of our collective pride; that same principle should apply to how we choose our public servants. If you are of the opinion that partisan politics is failing the people of this nation, and if you believe that the focus of government must be upon “we” instead of upon “me,” then I ask you to veer away from partisan politicians, and to vote for a candidate whose only obligation would be to the voters.

Democrats Send Progressives To Convention


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Logo for RI Democratic Party

Congratulations to the delegate candidates who won an opportunity to go to the Democratic National Convention in yesterday’s primary. While overall turnout may have been low, it seems as if progressives got out the vote as all but two of our endorsed candidates prevailed.

Anne Connor, whom we profiled, received more overall votes than former Providence Mayor Joe Paolino, who took out an ad in the ProJo (though he did spell the president’s name wrong in it). She even got more votes than him in his hometown of Providence – and she lives in suburban Barrington.

Conservative, anti-union Democrat Doug Gablinske received the fewest votes in CD1

In CD2, the three progressive members of the General Assembly – Josh Miller, Frank Ferri and Teresa Tanzi netted nearly 1,000 more overall votes than the three Weiner candidates, an affluent family from East Greenwich known for being political insiders and regulars at the party convention.

For a complete list of results, click here.

The winners are below, including total number of votes they garnered and percentage.

UPDATE: RI Future Publisher Emeritus Matt Jerzyk writes that our delegate results isn’t accurate because Democratic rules for the representing candidates at the convention employ a sort of affirmative action in which the top 5 men and top 6 women from each district are chosen. As such, these are the results according to Jerzyk:

The top 5 men and top 6 women in each CD are elected – not just the top 11.  That would mean the following won yesterday:

CD-1

  • Myrth YORK
  • Julie E. MEYERS
  • Anne W. CONNOR
  • Joseph R. PAOLINO, JR.
  • Onna A. MONIZ-JOHN
  • Mary A. GASBARRO
  • June S. SPEAKMAN
  • Brett P. SMILEY
  • Tom CODERRE
  • Gerald Pedro CARVALHO
  • David A. SALVATORE

CD-2

  • Joshua MILLER
  • Patrick T. FOGARTY
  • Teresa TANZI
  • Frank G. FERRI
  • Elaine PRIOR
  • Michael A. SOLOMON
  • L. Susan WEINER
  • Mark S. WEINER
  • Elisa M. POLLARD
  • Helen S. TAYLOR
  • Zoe I. WEINER

CD1

Myrth YORK 2831 10.4%
Julie E. MEYERS 2153 7.9%
Anne W. CONNOR 2061 7.6%
Joseph R. PAOLINO, JR. 1986 7.3%
Onna A. MONIZ-JOHN 1880 6.9%
Mary A. GASBARRO 1833 6.7%
June S. SPEAKMAN 1776 6.5%
Brett P. SMILEY 1763 6.5%
Rebecca Kim MEARS 1694 6.2%
Tom CODERRE 1640 6.0%
Gerald Pedro CARVALHO 1369 5.0%

CD2

Joshua MILLER 1313 7.8%
Patrick T. FOGARTY 1272 7.6%
Teresa TANZI 1233 7.3%
Frank G. FERRI 1137 6.8%
Elaine PRIOR 1131 6.7%
Michael A. SOLOMON 1109 6.6%
L. Susan WEINER 1033 6.1%
Mark S. WEINER 1007 6.0%
Thomas J. IZZO 990 5.9%
Ryan Patrick KELLEY 986 5.9%
Elisa M. POLLARD 972 5.8%