Senator Whitehouse is fighting ‘dark money’ in Washington


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2016-09-06 Dark Money 006Saying that fighting dark money in politics is his “patriotic duty,” Senator Sheldon Whitehouse sat next to Congressmembers David Cicilline and James Langevin in a “roundtable discussion” to highlight his work on the DISCLOSE Act, introduced by the Senator in June, which would “require disclosure of donations greater than $10,000 to organizations spending at least $10,000 in an election.”

“The American people want and deserve accountability in their elections,” said Whitehouse, “Unchecked secret corporate spending has tipped the scales of power away from ordinary Americans and in favor of big special interests. If Congress is going to make meaningful progress in the months and years ahead on important issues that matter to Rhode Islanders like addressing climate change, reforming our broken campaign finance system is the first step.”

Whitehouse’s DISCLOSE Act, which has been supported by Langevin and Cicilline in the U.S. House of Representatives, is part of the “We the People” legislative package to deal with secret corporate political spending, lobbyist influence, the revolving door, and other facets of the campaign finance system. Whitehouse touted the suite of legislation as a solution to the corporate spending blocking meaningful legislative action on issues like ensuring economic security for the middle class and addressing climate change.

It seems that Whitehouse mentioned climate change and chose Save the Bay’s headquarters in Providence as the location of his round table discussion because, as the Senator said in response to Meghan Kallman, chair of the RI Sierra Club, “I think it’s pretty safe to say, that at a national level, the climate battle is the campaign finance battle. They’re totally married together into one thing.”

2016-09-06 Dark Money 003Notably, there were protesters outside Save the Bay holding signs reminding their elected representatives about both Invenergy’s proposed $700 million fracked gas and diesel oil burning power plant and National Grid’s proposed LNG liquefaction facility for Fields Point in the Port of Providence, a stone’s throw away. They were there to remind elected officials that their jobs in Washington do not absolve them from taking positions on local issues. None of the elected leaders in the room, aside from State Senator Juan Pichardo, who has publicly taken a stand against the LNG plant in Providence, have thrown their considerable political weight behind the opposition to these projects.

“This is a national package, [but] many many many issues are local,” said Kallman, “We’re watching Dakota. We’re watching Burrillville. We’re watching Fields Point… We have something of a disconnect between what’s happening on the national level and where the front line battles are being fought.”

2016-09-06 Dark Money 004The influence of corporate spending on elections since the 2010 Citizens United decision by the Supreme Court is a major concern to all who attended the event. Citizens United unleashed a previously restricted torrent of special interest money into the political system.  More than $1.5 billion in unlimited contributions, including more than $500 million in secret contributions, have been poured into federal elections since the decision was issued.

“It didn’t take long after Citizens United for secret money has find its way to the shores of Rhode Island,” said John Marion, Executive Director of Common Cause Rhode Island. “We know that Rhode Islanders don’t want unlimited undisclosed money in our elections. We are fortunate to have a congressional delegation that has taken this issue seriously and has offered real solutions for the problems posed by big money in our politics.”

“Senator Whitehouse is a national leader fighting to make our elections and government work for everyday people again through the We the People Act,” said Aquene Freechild, campaign co-director of Public Citizen‘s Democracy Is For People Campaign. “He’s pushing the current congressional majority to snap out of their campaign cash-induced paralysis and stand up to the tiny but influential donor class: by overturning Citizens United, disclosing all spending in elections, and slamming shut the revolving door that transforms public servants into corporate shills.”

Also in attendance at the roundtable discussion were RI Secretary of State Nellie Gorbea, RI State Representative Art Handy, state director of Clean Water Action Jonathan Berard, Save the Bay’s Topher Hamblett and Dean Michael J. Yelnosky of the Roger Williams University School of Law. You can watch the rest of the video from the event below.

2016-09-06 Dark Money 0052016-09-06 Dark Money 001

Patreon

Clean Water Action ‘deeply disappointed’ with Raimondo, Archambault


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2016-05-26 Burrillville at the State House 023The RI Sierra Club made a bold move when they revoked their endorsements of Senators Steven Archambault and William Conley over their Senate Judiciary Committee votes against the people of Burrillville in their fight against a proposed power plant in their town. Clean Water Action has also endorsed Archambault and in addition, they have backed Governor Gina Raimondo, the strongest supporter of the power plant among the state’s elected officials.

I asked Clean Water Action’s Rhode Island State Director Johnathan Berard if his group was willing to revoke their endorsements.

Berard commented that his group is “deeply disappointed” but stopped short of revoking the endorsements Clean Water Action gave out during the last election.

Clean Water Action ardently opposes the construction of any fossil-fuel burning power plants in Rhode Island and we are deeply disappointed that these general assembly members and the governor, who we supported in 2014 based on their promise of environmental leadership, have chosen to ignore the will of the majority of Rhode Islanders, as well as the environmental and public health communities, by forging ahead with the development of new natural gas infrastructure projects across the state.”

Compared to the position taken by the Sierra Club, this is a soft response. Clean Water Action seems to have a process to endorse candidates, but their endorsements lack any teeth when it comes to holding elected officials accountable.

Patreon

What’s at Stake Nov. 6th: Remember Climate Change


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Today through Frday I’m going to put up a couple of posts about how our environment is going to be impacted by what happens on November 6th. With all the talk about jobs and the economy, I am continually surprised that so few are connecting these topics to the invaluable strides our nation has made in protecting our rivers, drinking water, air, oceans, parks, mountains and beaches over the last half century.

The economy is more than unemployment numbers, GDP and stock prices; it is a measure of our quality of life and participation in society. Let’s start looking at some of the issues that will have a profound impact on our economy and way of life in the future.

First, let’s take a quick trip in our “Way-Back” machine. Clean Water Action hard-wired it into all of our office computers a couple years ago. It is a useful tool for providing some context for the campaign rhetoric we are forced to consume every four years.

Here is an excerpt from a May 2008 speech by The Maverick, John McCain:

We stand warned by serious and credible scientists across the world that time is short and the dangers are great. The most relevant question now is whether our own government is equal to the challenge… In the years ahead, we are likely to see reduced water supplies…more forest fires than in previous decades…changes in crop production…more heat waves afflicting our cities and a greater intensity in storms. Each one of these consequences of climate change will require policies to protect our citizens, especially those most vulnerable to violent weather.

What a prediction! Can you imagine a Republican Presidential nominee uttering such words? But would he propose a solution to such a national issue?

 To lead in this effort, however, our government must strike at the source of the problem… We know that greenhouse gasses are heavily implicated as a cause of climate change. And we know that among all greenhouse gasses, the worst by far is the carbon-dioxide that results from fossil-fuel combustion… We will cap emissions according to specific goals, measuring progress by reference to past carbon emissions. By the year 2012, we will seek a return to 2005 levels of emission…by 2020, a return to 1990 levels…and so on until we have achieved at least a reduction of sixty percent below 1990 levels by the year 2050… And in pursuit of these objectives, we cannot afford to take economic growth and job creation for granted. A strong and growing economy is essential to all of our goals, and especially the goal of finding alternatives to carbon-based technology. We want to turn the American economy toward cleaner and safer energy sources

Doth my eyes deceive? Was that a plan to address carbon emissions? How would a Democrat respond to such specifics? An upstart Senator from Illinois said this:

And in the long-term, few regions [speech was in Miami] are more imperiled by the stronger storms, higher floodwaters, and devastating droughts that could come with global warming. Whole crops could disappear, putting the food supply at risk for hundreds of millions. While we share this risk, we also share the resources to do something about it. That’s why I’ll bring together the countries of the region in a new Energy Partnership for the Americas. We need to go beyond bilateral agreements. We need a regional approach. Together, we can forge a path toward sustainable growth and clean energy. Leadership must begin at home. That’s why I’ve proposed a cap and trade system to limit our carbon emissions and to invest in alternative sources of energy. We’ll allow industrial emitters to offset a portion of this cost by investing in low carbon energy projects in Latin America and the Caribbean. And we’ll increase research and development across the Americas in clean coal technology, in the next generation of sustainable biofuels not taken from food crops, and in wind and solar energy.

Perhaps I am complicit in my own deception. It appears that our two major Presidential candidates, only four years ago, ran on a shared a platform to address climate change. The halcyon days of 2008.

 

Despite my dismay that President Obama has maintained radio silence on how he will reinvigorate the debate around a cap-and-trade system and reducing carbon emissions, the President has taken action to warrant a reelection endorsement by the environmental community. A short comparison of President Obama and Governor Romney provides the following:

The President is only one piece of the puzzle. We need a U.S. Senate that is willing to take action. Addressing climate change is not just about wind turbines and solar power; it is about protecting American people and society. Weather patterns are continually more hostile for a much of American and global temperatures continue a steep rise, threatening our ocean and marine habitats. It is for a new path.

Take a minute (or 38 of them) and listen to Senator Whitehouse. I would not have said it better myself. Let us pull out a couple key points made by the Honorable Senator from Rhode Island:

Human actions have resulted in warming and acidification of the oceans and are now causing increasing hypoxia. Acidification is obvious — the ocean is becoming more acid; hypoxia means low oxygen levels. Studies of the Earth’s past indicate that these are the three symptoms . . . associated with each of the previous five mass extinctions on Earth.

When polluters were required to phase out the chemicals they were emitting that were literally burning a hole through our Earth’s atmosphere[remember CFC’s?], they warned that it would create “severe economic and social disruption” due to “shutdowns of refrigeration equipment in supermarkets, office buildings, hotels, and hospitals.” Well, in fact, the phaseout happened 4 years to 6 years faster than predicted; it cost 30 percent less than predicted; and the American refrigeration industry innovated and created new export markets for its environmentally friendly products. Anyway, the real point is we are not just in this Chamber to represent the polluters. We are supposed to be here to represent all Americans, and Americans benefit from environmental regulation big time.

A quick peak at the issues page on Hickley’s website shows specific support for increased use of fossil fuels and opposition to the, at one time, bi-partisan proposal for a cap-and-trade program that would provide the necessary economic incentives to reduce carbon emissions. We need a new path.

Of course,the Whitehouse – Hinckley race does not exist in a vacuum. If the United States is to take action on climate change there is one person who CANNOT control the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee: James M. Inhofe. Despite the 97% of all scientist which agree that climate change is happening because of human activity, Inhofe prefers to believe in a worldwide conspiracy.

Our choice in Rhode Island (and Massachusetts, Go Warren!) will impact our next steps. I do not want to support a single party in Congress, because the environment used to be a non-partisan issue, see Teddy Roosevelt and John Chafee. When the national Republican Party, however, stopped protection of open spaces, stopped preservation of the wetlands that buffer our coasts, and exempted  for hydraulic-fracking companies from disclosing what they are pumping into our groundwater, I figured it was time to take sides.

Oh, how I wish to return to the days when adults could talk about climate change without being accused of killing jobs. This is a short-sighted and narrow lens through which to view our economy. Developing a sustainable and beneficial economy for all of America requires attention to the elephant in the room: global warming. That’s right, I said it, global warming. Ever see the phrase “Rhode Island: 3% bigger at low tide”? Imagine sea level rise continuing at its current pace. “Rhode Island: 3% smaller every century

Stay tuned for tomorrow’s installment of “What’s at Stake on November 6th” where I will review some of the environmental issues facing the U.S House of Representatives in the next two years.

Clean Water Action Endorses Candidates


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
State House Dome from North Main Street
State House Dome from North Main Street
The State House dome from North Main Street. (Photo by Bob Plain)

With September 11th just around the corner, it is time for RI Primary voters to make up their mind. I’m sure you have been sitting up half the night wondering which candidate has the strongest voice for our environment. Look no further.

Clean Water Action is proud to announce that, after vetting the candidates who seek the green stamp of approval, we have a list of those that we believe to be valuable allies. Whether your concerns are about sustainable funding for public transportation, keeping the ban on incineration in place, preserving and extending the life of our landfill, investing in water infrastructure or, more simply, protecting the beauty of Narragansett Bay and our endless coastline, consider these candidates when going to the poll next week.

For next Tuesday’s Statewide Primary, Clean Water Action has endorsed the following candidates:

– David Cicilline (D) – 1st Congressional District

– Chris Blazejewski (D) – House District 2 (Providence)

– Libby Kimzey (D) – House District 8 (Providence)

– Joe Almeida (D) – House District 12 (Providence)

– Art Handy (D) – House District 18 (Cranston)

– Jay O’Grady (D) – House District 46 (Lincoln and Pawtucket)

– Stephen Casey (D) – House District 50 (Woonsocket)

– Gus Uht (D) – House District 52 (Cumberland)

– Gayle Goldin (D) – Senate District 3 (Providence)

– Adam Satchell (D) – Senate District 9 (West Warwick)

– Bob DaSilva (D) – Senate District 14 (East Providence)

– Lewis Pryeor (D) – Senate District 24 (Woonsocketand and North Smithfield)

– Gene Dyzlewski (D) – Senate District 26 (Cranston)

– Laura Pisaturo (D) – Senate District 29 (Warwick)

Clean Water is contacting its members in these districts by going door-to-door, making phone calls, and mailing letters to urge them to vote for environmental candidates. Another round of endorsements will be made for the General Election.

CWA Supports Product Stewardship for CFLs


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The House Environment and Natural Resources Committee heard testimony last week on several pieces of legislation aimed at involving producers in the end-of-life management of their products.

This concept, known as Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), creates financial incentives for manufacturers to design products that are less toxic, more durable, and more easily recycled. Rhode Island already has three EPR laws on the books. The collection of electronic waste, mercury auto switches, and mercury thermostats are managed through programs that are created and funded by manufacturers.

House Bill 7443 takes the next step in keeping mercury out of our waste stream, requiring manufacturers of florescent light bulbs either to develop a voluntary program to address the disposal of their bulbs or allow the Department of Environmental Management (DEM) to convene a stakeholder group charged with the creation of a mandatory program.

Sponsor of this bill and Committee Vice Chairperson, Rep. Donna Walsh (D-Charlestown) opened the hearing to a packed room by stating, “Producer responsibility is here to stay.” She also emphasized the flexibility of the bill. “There is a voluntary program in this. There are options.”

“I am excited about the NEMA’s (National Electrical Manufacturers Association) new position on producer responsibility,” said Jamie Rhodes, Rhode Island Director for Clean Water Action. “There was near universal agreement on the need for further action to prevent any additional mercury from being disposed of inappropriately. It is always a positive experience when we can work with manufacturers to develop a plan that works just as well for them as it does for all Rhode Islanders.”

Janet Coit, Director of Rhode Island DEM stated, “It looks like we’re moving towards the same thing.” The driving force behind DEM’s support for fluorescent lamp product stewardship is the hazard of improper disposal of mercury. Coit continued, “Mercury is a powerful neurotoxin and we do want to deal with that.” Liz Stone, spokeswoman for DEM, added, “What it comes down to, is that there are very few places in the state to take your bulbs.  So many people throw them in the trash because they don’t know what to do with them.”
In recognizing the positive steps that industry has taken voluntarily, staff attorney Jerry Elmer of the Conservation Law Foundations added, “Despite the fact that 90% of the mercury in light bulbs has been removed and that we’ve moving away from CFLs, there’s still a lot of mercury in the waste stream that needs to be addressed.” Rhode Island Resource Recovery Corporation estimated that they spend around $6,000 to dispose of the 8,000 – 12,000 fluorescent bulbs which they collect.

While House Bill 7443 gives DEM the ability to promulgate rules to address fluorescent lamps, it contains a specific provision to allow a voluntary program to be created by the industry and submitted to the DEM for approval. In support of a potential NEMA voluntary program, Stone added, “This law allows for a voluntary program and we at DEM prefer that. Laws have generally been passed because the industry needs that nudging.”

Matt Prindiville, Associate Director of the Product Policy Institute, described the success of similar programs in other states. “We have over 200 collection locations in Maine, many of them at retail locations. It’s easy for consumers to find these sites.”

RI municipalities have also supported the concept of EPR. “Fourteen of Rhode Island’s cities and towns, representing 56% of the state’s population, have already passed resolutions in support of producer responsibility,” affirmed Amy Vitale of Clean Water Action during the hearing. “This is an extension of existing Rhode Island laws aimed at reducing human exposure to mercury. Though the industry assures us that fluorescent lamps containing mercury are being phased out, their long lifespan ensures that they will be part of our waste stream for at least the next decade.”

Clean Water Action (CWA) is a national organization with over 40,000 members in Rhode Island, working to protect our environment, health, economic well-being and community quality of life. CWA organizes strong grassroots groups and coalitions, and campaigns to elect environmental candidates and solve environmental and community problems.

Many organizations were on hand to support this proposal, including RI Resource Recovery Corporation, Conservation Law Foundation, Clean Water Action, the RI Product Stewardship Council, Sierra Club, the RI DEM, Environment RI, and the Environment Council of RI.

DL Providence presents: Faces you should know – Feb. 22 from 7 – 9pm

2012 is already shaping up to be an exciting year in politics.  Not only is it a presidential election year, but we have our local politics to keep us entertained.  With the ongoing redistricting fight, the many social and economic issues that will be at play in elections, and Netroots Nation coming to RI in June, we are getting the gang back together and kick-starting Drinking Liberally Providence.  New hosts – Kate Brock, Paula Hodges and Dawn Euer have joined Chris Blazejewski & David Segal to set things in motion.  So, with new hosts in tow, it is  fitting to make February’s DL theme about some other faces with new political gigs in Rhode Island.

On the Docket for next Wednesday:

Jamie Rhodes, RI State Director, Clean Water Action

Jamie formerly served as Clean Water Action’s canvas director from 2006 – 2009 before heading to law school in 2009.  For now, he’ll be splitting time between the Clean Water Action office on Westminster Street and his final semester at Roger Williams University School of Law in Bristol until he graduates in May.  Rhodes has also worked for Ocean State Action and for David Segal’s Congressional Campaign.

Paula Hodges, RI Public Policy & Advocacy Director, Planned Parenthood of Southern New England

Paula is a Missouri native who just relocated to Rhode Island in December. She last worked as Political Director for Missouri National Education Association (MNEA), the state’s largest public employee union and prior to that coordinated progressive labor, environmental and women’s groups’ electoral plans at the America Votes – Missouri table. Paula previously served as deputy director of policy for Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan.

Kristina Fox, Organizing Director, Ocean State Action
Kristina is a native Rhode Islander now living in Providence. After serving two years in AmeriCorps she organized with UNITE HERE! Local 217 and helped win contract victories at the Westin Hotel, Dunkin Donuts Center and East Bay School Lunch Collaborative. Before coming to Ocean State Action she co-managed a nutrition education program for low-income families with Farm Fresh Rhode Island.

So, please join your new hosts in welcoming new faces and Drinking Liberally at a new (slightly earlier) time 7-9pm, and the same great location (Wild Colonial).

Clean Water Action Hires Jamie Rhodes


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

I first met Jamie Rhodes while working on David Segal’s campaign for Congress and for the past year or so since he’s been with Ocean State Action.  He’s a great guy and will be a great addition for Clean Water Action as their new Director.  Congratulations Jamie!

Here’s the press release:

Clean Water Action welcomed Jamie Rhodes to the position of Rhode Island State Director on February 1, 2012. Rhodes was selected as the next director following the departure of long‐time director, Sheila Dormody, who has moved on to Providence City Hall as the city’s first Sustainability Director. Rhodes previously was Canvass Director from 2006 through 2009 before enrolling at Roger Williams University School of Law in Bristol, Rhode Island.

“We are excited to add Jamie to our leadership team,” said Cindy Luppi, New England Director. “Rhode Island has taken great strides towards being a national model for mercury pollution prevention, investment in renewable energy and creation of producer responsibility programs. Jamie has the right combination of talent, drive and experience that will add to Clean Water’s track record as a leading voice in Rhode Island’s environmental movement.”

“I am honored to re‐join Clean Water Action’s successful team here in Rhode Island,” says Rhodes. “I look forward to working with our allies in the fight for our water, our health and our communities. As working Rhode Islanders struggle, our state needs to continue its commitment to public health and environmental justice.”

In addition to Rhodes, Clean Water Action has also brought on former ACLU staff member, Amy Vitale, to promote the group’s legislative priorities on Smith Hill this year. “Amy will be a great addition to our team,” adds Rhodes, “Her years of experience working with the General Assembly will be invaluable for this year’s push to expand manufacturer‐funded recycling programs to include paint and packaging and to stop short‐sighted efforts to overturn Rhode Island’s decades‐long ban on municipal waste incineration.”

In addition to the work to promote progressive solid waste policies, Clean Water Action’s 2012 priorities include:

  • Promote sustainable funding for public transportation.
  • Establish environmental criteria for schools sited on hazardous land.
  • Elect pro-environmental candidates.

Clean Water Action is a national grassroots environmental organization with over 40,000 members in Rhode Island.

Leading Environmentalist Sheila Dormody picked as Providence’s first Sustainability Director

EcoRI reports that Providence Mayor Angel Taveras has hired the longtime director of Clean Water Action, Sheila Dormody, to be the city’s first Sustainability Director.  This hire is another impressive progressive hire by Taveras since taking office in January including: former blog godfather and SEIU/JwJ organizer Matt Jerzyk, trial attorney and Obama finance co-chair Jeff Padwa and AS220ist David Ortiz.

“I am thrilled that Sheila is joining our team and bringing with her a wealth of experience. I look forward to working with Sheila to make Providence one of the greenest cities in the nation,” said Mayor Taveras.

“Providence is well-positioned to be a great, green city,” said Dormody. “Providence has an abundance of committed leaders willing to help make the city the best it can be. I am looking forward to bringing people together to lower energy costs, reduce the city’s carbon footprint and identify environmentally conscious, cost-saving opportunities. I can’t wait to get started.”

Dormody has been involved in advocacy, grassroots organizing, and training activists for the environmental community since 1989. She is the outgoing New England co-director of Clean Water Action, an organization in which she has worked for since 2000.

She has served as the chair of the Providence Environmental Sustainability Task Force and co-chaired Mayor Taveras’ Environmental Transition Committee. Dormody won a U.S. EPA Merit Award in 2008 for her work to prevent mercury pollution.

Dormody has also led key collaborations to promote policies to that strengthen the economy, protect the environment and promote public health including the Coalition for Transportation Choices and the Coalition for Water Security.

She lives in Providence with her husband.

The Sustainability Director position is funded by a federal Energy Efficiency Conservation Block Grant (EEGBC).
As the city’s Sustainability Director, Dormody will oversee efforts to the reduce the city’s energy expenditures, manage Providence’s “Greenprint” initiative to align the city’s workforce with the green economy, develop a comprehensive sustainability action plan, implement a citywide composting program and increase recycling in the city.

The position was championed by City Council Majority Leader Seth Yurdin and established by the City Council in 2008, but has never been filled.

“I am pleased to see the Sustainability position finally being filled – especially by someone with a resume and background like Sheila Dormody,” said Councilman Yurdin. “This position will save the city money by implementing common sense, cost-saving measures that other cities have done. In addition, this position will move the city’s economy forward by creating green jobs and identifying renewable energy initiatives.”

Dormody’s colleagues at Clean Water Action are enthusiastic for the city’s leadership on environmental issues.

“We look forward to collaborating with the City of Providence on this exciting next chapter of revitalization, innovation and sustainability,” said Cindy Luppi, New England co-director of Clean Water Action. “We have every confidence that Providence will lead the nation in tapping into 21st century green potential.”