Is ‘anti-gay therapist’ Dr. Cretella a therapist or not?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Matthew Cuddeback
Matthew Cuddeback

The recent cancellation of anti-LGBTQ activist Michelle Cretella’s talk at Providence College by Dr. Matthew Cuddeback has taken a new turn.

Cuddeback initially invited Cretella, a founding member of NOM-RI (dedicated to preventing marriage equality in our state), a board member of NARTH (dedicated to “curing” homosexuality) and vice president of the American College of Pediatrics (a group that broke away from the American Academy of Pediatrics because of its support of adoption by gay and lesbian couples) not to discuss any of that work, apparently, but to “describe her journey to navigate the controversial issue of homosexuality as a physician and a Catholic.

Cuddeback defended inviting an Cretella because she “is not a therapist, and had no intent to speak as one. Her intent was to speak of her journey, as a physician, from rejecter to appreciator of the Catholic and natural law traditions concerning homosexuality.”

If Cretella is not a therapist, and had no intention to speak as one, how does one explain a piece she wrote on LifeSiteNews yesterday in which she said,

No therapy is free from harm. Regarding all forms of psychotherapy for any given condition a surprisingly high 14-24 percent of children deteriorate during psychotherapy.

This sounds like something a therapist might say, especially one who signs her piece as Michelle Cretella, MD and chairs the American College of Pediatricians’ Committee on Adolescent Sexuality. She certainly wants us to accept that her credentials somehow add gravitas to her opinions. Note also that this piece was to appear in the same week that Cretella was scheduled to speak at PC.

The piece she wrote yesterday never once mentions “natural law” or Catholicism. Instead, Cretella lays out her case as a lawyer might, filling her piece with footnotes and links to studies. To some her piece might look like a case made by a scientist or a doctor, but it is not. It is pure religious advocacy, dressed up as science to present an opinion, not fact. Cretella wrote the piece to argue against laws that prevent so-called therapists from attempting to “cure” those under the age of eighteen of homosexuality.

Cretella never mentions what some of these therapies entail. Cures advanced over the years for treating homosexuality have included Prozac, playing sports, hypnosis and gaining weight. One extreme example is aversion therapy, in which victims are shown pornography and their genitals are electrocuted when they react improperly. Ruined lives and suicides are often the tragic result of these techniques, but Cretella, who is not a therapist, is silent. Perhaps because, not being a therapist, she is not qualified to speak on these topics?

Cuddeback, in canceling the talk, said, “Because I sense that Dr. Cretella may be the object of animus were she to present at PC next week, I have advised her that we shall postpone her presentation.”

Cuddeback is being disingenuous. Cretella has earned every inch of animus aimed her way.

Providence College postpones controversial anti-LGBTQ lecturer


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
200x229MichelleCretella1
Cretella

From an outsider’s perspective, Providence College seems caught between wanting to be two very different things. On the one side, PC wishes to be an academic institution dedicated to free and open inquiry, pursuing the truth where ever the search may lead. On the other hand, it sometimes seems that there are those who wish this Catholic institution of higher learning to be a defender of the Catholic faith, promoting theology as science with an eye towards influencing public policy.

Back in October, PC came under criticism for canceling a talk by Wayne State University philosopher John Corvino because his lecture, in support of marriage equality, would be “in defiance” of PC’s “fundamental moral principles.” I took some hits from the conservative Catholic right for my position, but the controversy was all but settled when Providence College’s Faculty Senate passed a resolution, by an overwhelming majority, taking Provost Hugh Lena to task for canceling Corvino’s talk.

In seems that Providence College, for the most part, is more interested in being a free and open academic institution than in simply being a forum for Catholic apologetics.

That’s not to say that those interested in inserting pseudoscience and poor philosophy into the public debate have gone away:

Dr. Matthew Cuddeback, sponsor of the controversial “Who Am I?” talk by Dr. Michelle Cretella, has announced the postponement of the event due to concern that “Dr. Cretella may be the object of animus were she to present at PC next week.” Dr. Cuddeback alleges inconsistency in campus support for academic freedom.

Cretella has long been an opponent of marriage equality and LGBTQ rights, often injecting her ideas and opinions into our state’s ongoing discussion over these issues. In 2008 she, along with Bishop Thomas Tobin, joined the board of NOM-RI, the group that led the fight against marriage equality in Rhode Island.

Cretella is on the board of the National Association for Research of Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH) an organization that claims homosexuality is a mental disorder that can be cured. She is also Vice president of the American College of Pediatrics, “a socially conservative organization that formed in 2002 as part of a protest regarding the American Academy of Pediatrics support of adoption by gay and lesbian couples.”

As Megan Grammatico notes, “Dr. Cretella is… biased. She is the vice president of an organization that was formed originally to oppose adoption by gay and lesbian couples, and relies on bad science to do so. See the heavily criticized research of Mark Regnerus here.” Grammatico’s piece does an excellent job running down why Cretella’s positions and views put her far outside the definition of scientist, and should be read in full.

Apparently a level headed and on point critique of Cretella’s credentials and scientific honesty has caused Matthew Cuddeback to conclude that his invited speaker “may be the object of animus were she to present at PC next week” and so he cancelled the event, but not before playing the victim card:

I am struck that many of the indignant voices raised for academic freedom in the wake of the cancellation of Dr. Corvino’s talk have been absent or ambivalent in the discussion of Dr. Cretella’s talk. Where are those voices now? Some have been silent. Some are harrumphing about NARTH, science, and reparative therapy. Some, who proposed to advocate for a campus-wide discussion that would include all perspectives, are trying to shame faculty who invite a speaker holding one of those perspectives, as irresponsibly insensitive to LGBT students. Do they believe that the freedom to speak belongs only to those who agree with their position?

It is hard to believe that Cuddeback isn’t being knowingly disingenuous here. His line about critics “harrumphing about NARTH, science, and reparative therapy” indicates the value he places on fidelity to good science and honest discussion. John Corvino and Michelle Cretella could not be more different as academic speakers. Whereas Corvino uses peer reviewed research and cogent argument to make his points, Cretella misuses good research and presents discredited studies as fact to spread her theologically biased beliefs. Cretella associates with NOM, an anti-LGBTQ hate group.

In short, Cretella does not deserve academic support because she does not do academic work.

Matthew Cuddeback, who invited Cretella to speak, is no stranger to disingenuous arguments. His testimony at the Rhode Island State Senate marriage equality hearing in 2013 was a pointless, confused and almost incoherent ramble about biological and “psychosexual complimentarianism.” You can watch it here: