The town council approved the resolution 7-0. The resolution also included a provision that Council President John Pacheco III will testify against the power plant before the Energy Facilities Siting Board (EFSB) and ask other municipalities to join the town in opposition.

The vote in opposition breaks a long period of “neutrality” on the part of the town council, which the council maintained was necessary so as to not give the appearance of trying to politically affect the outcomes of advisory opinions from the town planning and zoning boards.

“The siting board and Invenergy can certainly never say we did not follow the process,” said Council President Pacheco.

But in the audience, townspeople were holding bright yellow signs that said, NO TAX TREATY, a preview of Monday night’s town council meeting to vote on an agreement with Invenergy to collect $94 million or more from Invenergy if the power plant is ultimately approved. Townspeople say that approving this tax treaty undercuts the council’s statement of opposition.

One by one the town council members explained their opposition to the project. Councillor Kimberly Brissette-Brown, who was absent, had her statement read by the town clerk. There was no public comment allowed, but the bright signs held by audience members spoke volumes.

On a personal note, I was extremely touched by the comments made by Councillor David Place and the reactions of the townspeople to the mention about RI Future and the work we’ve done on Burrillville. Thank you.

To be continued on Monday night. Here’s the full video:

The Burrillville Democratic Town Committee voted unanimously to endorse three candidates for town council. All three oppose the $700 million fracked gas and diesel oil burning power plant proposed for the town by Invenergy and supported by the present town council.

“In all these cases,” said Committee Chairman Stephen Mulcahey, “we have candidates who are committed to opposing the proposed power plant. In addition, these candidates have the experience and capacity to govern past this one issue”.

The three candidates are:

• Jim Alix, a retired school counselor (MSW). He and his wife, Kathy, a retired school teacher have been residents of Burrillville for over 30 years. Jim has been an active member of the Burrillville Parks and Rec program as well the Burrillville Extended Care Program.
• Michael Dutilly, a career firefighter and union president of the Harrisville Fire Department. Mike is a lifelong resident of Burrillville and a graduate of Burrillville High School. Mike is married and has a newborn baby boy.
• Bob Perreault, a multi-generational Burrillville resident. Bob is a retired Zambarano Hospital employee where he spent his career caring for patients. Bob was a Therapeutic Services provider and has a keen sense of empathy for our fellow residents at Zambarano Hospital.

It is thought that Councillors Nancy Binns and Kimberly Brissette Brown will not be seeking re-election. The only councillor up for re-election is Council President John Pacheco. Councillor David Place, not up for re-election, has plans to run for state representative, against Cale Keable. It’s unclear how this race would affect the make up of the Town Council.

A new Burrillville Town Council may come too late to have an impact on the Energy Facilities Siting Board (EFSB)’s decision regarding the plant. Close observers say the current make up of the Town Council supports the plant 4-3, with Stephen Rawson, David Fox, Place and Binns in support and Pacheco, Brissete Brown and Michelle Bouchard against.

At the same meeting, the Burrillville Democratic Town Committee gave its endorsement for reelection to State Senator Paul Fogarty and State Rep. Cale Keable, who made an unsuccessful play in the State House to pass legislation that would give voters in Burrillville the opportunity to vote on any tax treaties the town council negotiates with energy companies in the town. That bill died in the Senate under “curious” conditions.

The Burrillville Town Council opposes legislation moving through the State House that would give local residents greater say on the tax agreement between the town and the proposed fracked gas power plant.

“The ill-conceived legislation before the General Assembly that purports to give residents a voice in the matter – in fact does the opposite,” said a letter released to RIPR’s Ian Donnis last night. “It weakens the Town Council’s ability to protect its residents and obtain financial compensation for hosting the proposed power plant.

The documents were released to Donnis by Dyana Koelsch, retained by the Town Council to handle public relations on their behalf. Koelsch, a former journalist-turned-public relations consultant, told me in a phone conversation last week she was retained by the Town Council to facilitate better communication between the Town Council and local residents.

The release of these documents seems to have come some time after the House passed Representative Cale Keable‘s bill, H8420 Sub A, which, if it becomes law, will allow the voters of Burrillville the opportunity to approve or reject any proposed tax treaty the Town Council makes with an power plant by popular vote. In recent days opposition to this bill has been ramping up, with Invenergy purchasing a full page ad in the Providence Journal on Saturday, an op-ed co-signed by Laurie White of the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce and Michael Sabitoni of the Rhode Island Building and Construction Trades Council on Sunday, and a bellicose tirade on the Journal’s editorial page yesterday.

Despite the opposition of business leaders and unions the Keable bill passed the floor 64 to 7 as Burrillville residents applauded. You can watch the vote below and see the reaction of Burrillville residents below. The difference between the votes reported above and the votes pictured is due to some legislators entering their votes late.

The release of the Burrillville Town Council letter opposing the Keable bill provoked a flurry of responses on social media. At about 10:30pm Burrillville City Councillor David Place confirmed that the letter was indeed accurate when he commented on Burrillville resident and power plant opponent Jeremy Bailey’s Facebook page.

The reaction from Burrillville residents has been negative and angry:

• “I have NEVER seen such political BS in my life!!!“
• “Has to be a back room deal going on ! Obviously representing Invenergy’s interest over the citizens!!!!“
• “This is very disappointing and kicks us in the gut ! These council people are traitors and sneaky too, it’s not fair to the towns people!“

It’s unclear when the Town Council decided to write the letter, or if that decision was made at a public meeting.

The timing of the release is strange, since tomorrow evening there is a Town Council meeting scheduled, with public comment. Past Burrillville Town Council meetings have been contentious. Tomorrow night’s promises to be explosive. Why the Town Council would choose to invite the approbation of their constituents is a mystery. There is talk of a recall election for the four Town Councillors not up for re-election this fall.

The most startling thing about the documents released is that they contain details of the town’s negotiated tax deal with Invenergy, details that the Town Council has previously stated must remain secret while being negotiated. Though the tax deal is not yet done, the Town Council says there is “an agreement in principle on the following:”

• $2.9 million upfront payment – $1.2 million in guaranteed payments even if the EFSB denies the application
• $92 million – $180 million guaranteed payments over the next 20 years
• Protection for property owners near the proposed power plant site through a property value agreement
• Fully binds future owners if the plant is sold or otherwise transferred
• Protection for Town residents into the future by locking in place a decommissioning plan

The Town Council claims that the legislation weakens the Council’s ability to protect its residents and obtain financial compensation for hosting the proposed power plant, strips the Town Council’s negotiating leverage that can force Invenergy to compensate the town, and jeopardizes efforts to put financial safeguards in place for residents near the power plant and compromises an agreement for the decommissioning of the plant.

I reached out to Jerry Elmer, a Senior Attorney for the Conservation Law Foundation, overnight and he was kind enough to send me some notes on the various documents, which I will quote in full beneath the page he references.

Elmer said, in summary, “The bottom line is this:  The members of the Town Council of Burrillville know, with absolute certainty, that the sweetheart deal they are negotiating with Invenergy would be overwhelmingly rejected by the voters of Burrillville if the voters of Burrillville got the right to vote on it.  The members of the Town Council are correct in their assessment.  That is why they are urging that the Keable-Fogarty Bill be rejected.”

From Jerry Elmer: “Document 2, page 1, bullets at the bottom:  Town Council claims it has remained “neutral” on whether the plant should be built in order not to taint its comments to the EFSB.  Two things must be said about this.  First (and maybe more important), these documents show that the Town Council has not remained neutral, and that the Town Council very much wants to enter into a Tax Treaty with Invenergy.  The Town Council is urging defeat of the Keable-Fogarty bill which would give the people of Burrillville the right to vote on such a (possible, future) tax treaty.  That is not “remaining neutral.”  Second, the Town Council has (very seriously) misunderstood what kind of “neutrality” is required of it by Rhode Island law.  The Town Council has consistently refused to discuss the proposed Invenergy plant, even at public meetings, called pursuant to the state’s Open Meetings Act, even with a stenographer present.  The Town Council pretends that this is being “neutral,” but this is merely ignoring constituents.  And, crucially, this refusal to discuss the Invenergy proposal in open meetings is not required by any Rhode Island statute, law, rule, or regulation, including the state’s Open Records Act.”

From Jerry Elmer: “Document 2, page 1, bullets at the bottom:  Town Council says that the purpose of the tax treaty is “to properly compensate Burrillville” if the Invenergy plant is built.  However, what constitutes a “proper” level of compensation is a judgment call, about which reasonable people may disagree.  The main effect of the Keable-Fogarty Bill would be to return that judgment call to the people of Burrillville.”

From Jerry Elmer: “Document 2, page 3, bullet half way down page [above], Town Council says:  Having a tax treaty is a “guarantee of full taxability” of Invenergy.  This is factually incorrect, and it is inconceivable to me that the Town Council is not fully aware of that fact.  There is today, in the Town of Burrillville, a background, already-existing tax law that would cover this power plant (just as every municipality in Rhode Island, and indeed the United States, has an existing, background law on how to tax the real estate of individuals and businesses).  The only reason that Invenergy wants a tax treaty with the Town of Burrillville is in order to get a different, lower tax rate.  This makes sense:  Invenergy will not negotiate with the Town for a higher tax rate; no business would do that, because it makes zero business sense.  The reason that Invenergy would not negotiate for a higher tax rate is that Invenergy, without any negotiations at all, could get the currently existing tax rate.  The only purpose of a tax treaty is to give the applicant (here, Invenergy) a lower tax rate than the existing one.  This is true of this tax treaty, just as it has been true of every tax treaty since tax treaties were invented.  In other words, when the Town Council says that a tax treaty is meant to be a “guarantee of full taxability” that statement is just factually incorrect.”

From Jerry Elmer: “Document 2, page 2, Town Council says that having a tax treaty in place “eliminates costly appraisals” and “eliminates volatility in future appraisals.”  On these two points, the Town Council is speaking the literal truth, but in a deeply misleading way.  These statements of the Town Council are factually accurate, but what is left unsaid is that, if the Keable-Fogarty Bill is defeated, that defeat will eliminate the right and ability of the people of Burrillville to vote on a Tax Treaty that may be reached between the Town Council and Invenergy.  Let me use an analogy:  I am threatening to murder you in cold blood.  Before I do it, I tell you to think about the many “advantages” of being dead:  you’ll save money on food, you’ll save money on rent, and you’ll never again go to a movie that you end up not liking.  What I am saying is literally true, but what I am saying is misleading (in the extreme).  So, too, with the Town Council statement.  A tax treaty would eliminate costly appraisals — and would eliminate the right of the people of Burrillville to vote on a sweetheart deal reached between the Town Council and the people of Burrillville.”

Tomorrow the Senate takes up their version of the bill, S3037 in Senate Judiciary at 2:30pm in room 313 in the State House. The Burrillville Town Council meets tomorrow evening at 7:00pm in the Town Council Chambers, Town Building, 105 Harrisville Main St., Harrisville.

If turning wind into electricity is a tax free proposition, it logically follows that turning “natural” gas into electricity would be as well. For instance, Invenergy‘s proposed $750 million fracked gas and oil burning plant in Burrillville, may well have been a tax free proposition for the company under this ruling.

Fortunately, there is a specific statute to the contrary, R. I. Gen. Laws § 44-3-30:

• 44-3-30 Burrillville – Property taxation of electricity generating facilities located in the town. – Notwithstanding any other provisions of the general laws to the contrary, the town council of the town of Burrillville is authorized to determine, by ordinance or resolution, an amount of taxes to be paid each year on account of real or personal property used in connection with any facility for the generation of electricity located in the town, notwithstanding the valuation of the property or the rate of tax.

All well and good then. The Town Council of Burrillville has the absolute right to set the taxes for the proposed Invenergy plant at any level they wish “notwithstanding any other provisions of the general laws”. They could set the tax rate at $1 a year or a $100 million a year. In fact, if the Town Council were truly interested in stopping the proposed power plant, they could simply set the tax rate at $100 billion per year. It would stop the development cold.

Let me repeat: Despite the RI Supreme Court ruling, the Burrillville Town Council has absolute authority to set the tax rate for the new power plant at whatever level they wish.

Yet that is not how Town Manager Michael Wood and Burrillville Town Council solicitors Oleg Nikolyszyn and Michael McElroy seem to have reacted to the court’s ruling. Instead, the Burrillville Town Council, at a special meeting on February 23, asked Reps Cale Keable and Brian Newberry, as well as Senator Paul Fogarty, to “make sure that the existing [state level] legislation [cited above] we have will allow for the siting and construction of the new power plant in the town.”

Though it is apparent that Keable, Newberry and Fogarty didn’t make any changes to RI State Law 44-3-30 concerning power plant taxation and that no changes were necessary, that isn’t the only change the Town Council asked their state representatives to make regarding the state law around power plants. About a month earlier, at a January 27 Town Council meeting and two week after the RI Supreme Court ruling, a resolution was unanimously passed by the Burrillville Town Council to “respectfully request that our legislative delegation introduce legislation” to amend  R. I. Gen. Laws § 44-3-9.3, which governs “exemption or stabilizing of taxes on qualifying property used for manufacturing or commercial purposes.”

According to the minutes of the meeting, the motion to vote on the request to change the law was made by Councillor David Place, who has announced his run for State Representative against Cale Keable.

What is the major change in the law requested by the Town Council? The addition of the word “manufacturing” over and over again within the statute, expanding the range of the statute to make sure that power plants (which could be classified as manufacturers now) are covered. Now again, changing this law is not necessary in order for Burrillville to have full control over the taxation of the proposed Invenergy plant, and the Town Council never mentions Invenergy or manufacturing when discussing this resolution prior to passage. But the timing of this requested change is suggestive.

If this request was in response to the RI Supreme Court decision, it demonstrates that the Town Council was aware of Invenergy’s plans in January, not February, as previously demonstrated. Like the February request for changes in the General Laws, this request was also ignored by Keable, Newberry and Fogarty.

Whether or not the Burrillville Town Council, Town Manager and legal counsel worried about the DePasquale v. Cwiek decision, it is apparent that they have been keen to make sure that the RI General Laws are in their favor and that the court’s decision will not apply to their town or to the Invenergy plant.

But it’s also hard to believe that the Town Council is interested in stopping the power plant’s construction. If they wanted the plant stopped, they simply have to propose a prohibitively high tax rate, one Invenergy could not afford. Cale Keable, as reported by several Burrillville residents, is correct when he says that the power to stop this plant rests with the Town Council. Sure, the Energy Facilities Siting Board has the power to approve the plant, but the Town Council has the power to make the plant so unprofitable that Invenergy will never bother building it.

The tone for the evening was set when Jan Luby took the council to task for apparently deceiving the public at a previous town council meeting about when exactly they learned that Invenergy was planning to build a power plant in their town. Council President John Pacheco had said that the Council had learned about it in August of least year, but video has surfaced showing that they knew as early as February.

“So now that we know that there’s no question you knew in February, not August, of last year… we’d like to know how you stand now, as individuals. We are your constituents and we deserve to know,” said Luby, even as she understood that under the Open Meetings Act, the council members could not answer questions but only listen. Luby then went on to suggest that Town Manager Michael Wood be fired, to much applause.

Terri Lacey took issue with comments she has seen and heard on social media regarding citizens opposed to the power plant. “The comments that have gotten back to us, about us… are intentionally  demeaning,” said Lacey, “It gives the perception to the community that we are troublemakers… and we are not to be taken seriously.”

Jason Olkowski spoke for a long time about his love for his adopted city and the quality of life he enjoys with his wife and daughter in Burrillville. “I’m concerned by a Governor that marginalizes the people of Burrillville as protesters,” said Olkowski, referencing a comment by Governor Gina Raimondo about opposition to the power plant.

The most interesting part of the evening was when the Council finally got around to Agenda Item 16-119, filed by residents Terri Lacey, Andrew Vanable, Jason Olkowski, Jeremy Bailey and Deborah Yablonski. During the last Town Council meeting it was revealed that Town Manager Michael Wood, with Town solicitors Oleg Nikolyszyn and Special Assistant Council Michael McElroy have been negotiating tax breaks for Invenergy’s power plant, without the awareness of the residents of Burrillville. Nikolyszyn and Pacheco said then that since the subject was not properly on the agenda, it could not be discussed.

But now that the item is properly on the agenda, the subject is still off limits, said Nikolyszyn. As the item came up for discussion, Nikolyszyn rose and told the crowd that such negotiations are secret and discussing details would be a violation of the law. This seemed to infuriate the crowd.

Nikolyszyn said that the Town Council was going to be briefed on the details of the negotiations after the public portion of the Town Council meeting ended, in executive (private) session. Right now, Nikolyszyn maintained, the Town Council was unaware of the details of negotiations. Despite Nikolyszyn’s preamble, residents stormed ahead and asked their questions anyway, fully aware that the Council was shielding themselves from answering behind their lawyers.

At 10:15 in the video above, Jason Olkowski and Jeremy Bailey ask their questions. The question as to when the negotiations began, why the negotiations were undertaken and who approved them could not be answered, said Nikolyszyn. The details of McElroy’s involvement with the negotiations, and how much he is paid, said Nikolyszyn, is not a public record.

The details of all negotiations will not be publicly known until negotiations are complete, said Nikolyszyn.

“That is certainly unfortunate,” replied Olkowski.

Olkowski then asked what are the advantages of negotiating a tax break for Invenrgy, rather than just leaving the $750 million plant on the tax rolls. Nikolyszyn replied that he is prepared to answer that question tonight, but in closed executive session, not with the residents in an open meeting. You don’t discuss the pros and cons of a business deal publicly, Nikolyszyn maintained.

The subject of the Town Council’s “neutrality” towards the plant came up. After the last Town Council meeting, many residents have wondered why the Town Council needs to be neutral about the power plant when Governor Raimondo has been a strong proponent. “It was I who advised the Council remain neutral” with respect to the power plant, said Nikolyszyn. “We don’t want to give [our appointed boards] marching orders, like the Governor did with the [Energy Facilities] Siting Board.”

It what could be seen as a direct attack on Raimondo’s credibility, Nikolyszyn said that not maintaining neutrality until the boards’ decisions are finalized weakens your credibility. We wants the reports of our boards to be respected, and not seen as just “following marching orders,” said Nikolyszyn.

One of the most frustrating parts of the discussion occurred at the 34 minute mark above. Tracey Keegan asked, “Could a council member make a motion to end all negotiations with Invenergy right now?”

After minutes of legalese and hemming and hawing on the part of Nikolyszyn, and after Keegan repeated the question multiple times, an exasperated Town Councillor David Place finally answered, “Yes.”

No one did, though. Instead, in a statement released today, Council President John Pacheco said, “…our team was directed to continue discussions… I’m satisfied that negotiations are headed in the right direction.”

More video from last night’s meeting:

Last note: Two Burrillville residents rose in support of the Town Council and Town Manager Michael Wood. Both were members of a board appointed by the the Town Council

At the most recent Burrillville Town Council meeting, Council President John Pacheco said that “As a town council, we did not know this plant was actually going to happen until the Governor announced it.”

Pacheco was not quite telling the truth.

Videos from February and March 2015 town council meetings show that local elected officials – both the council and legislators – have been paving the way for the controversial Invenergy power plant for months before Governor Gina Raimondo officially announced the project, contrary to recent statements by the Council President.

Governor Gina Raimondo announced Invenergy’s plans to build another power plant in Burrillville on August 4, 2015. The town council met with local legislators Paul Fogarty, Cale Keable and Brian Newberry to discuss the idea seven months earlier.

On February 23, 2015 Burrillville Town Manager Michael C Wood, at a “special meeting” of the town council, said, “We’ve had some conversation. There’s the potential for a new power plant to come to Burrillville.” Present at this meeting was the entire Town Council except for Stephen Rawson and Donald Fox.

This special meeting was between the town council and state Senator Paul Fogarty, Representative Cale Keable, and Representative Brian Newberry. The meeting was held to discuss state level legislation of interest to the town council with their state representatives.

Wood told the council and legislators he wanted to “make sure that the existing [state level] legislation we have will allow for the siting and construction of the new power plant in the town.” The legislation concerns Burrillville’s ability to enter into tax agreements with power companies and can be seen here.

“It would be appreciated, Cale,” said Wood, talking to Rep Keable directly, “making sure that that legislation, as written, will allow the town to potentially entertain the possibility of a new power plant.”

“Okay,” said Keable, “We’ll look at that.”

As can be seen from this screen shot from earlier in the video, this meeting was poorly attended.

At another “special meeting” on March 18, 2015, Town Councilor Stephen Rawson talked about Burrillville water contaminated with MTBE. Several years ago some of the well water in Burrillville was contaminated with MTBE, a virulent carcinogen that some residents say sparked a cancer cluster in the town. The water that Invenergy wants to use for its cooling system will come from this MTBE contaminated well water.

Though Invenergy claims the water will be filtered and the water will be pure enough to dump in the Clear River when they are done, no one seems quite sure if the science adds up. Note also that as far as I have been able to tell, no one has attempted to use MTBE contaminated water to cool a power plant before.

In the clip below, Rawson says that, “Years ago Mike [Town Manager Michael Wood] had tried to make a proposal, and it was a good one, to run that water up to the [Ocean State] power plant as cooling water so the wells would be flushed and probably get rid of the MTBE that’s in the ground water.”

Rawson notes that Harrisville, which has authority over this situation, blocked this proposal.

Town Councillor David Place then says to Wood, “you and I had that discussion with that new power plant going in, of bringing back that idea of running a line to the new power plant and doing the exact same thing when that new power plant comes in. I think you said that that discussion had come up.”

“They have already reached out to Mike Kirkwood [General Manager of the Pascoag Utility District],” said Wood, “I don’t know about Harrisville…”

“They shouldn’t be involved at all,” said Place, because the wells and siting of the power plant will be entirely inside Burrillville, and Harrisville will have no control over the decision.

“To get to your point, Steve,” continued Wood, addressing Rawson, “that probably will happen, and that will help the well situation…”

Later in the same meeting Town Manager Wood says, “We need to set up something, maybe not right now, to deal with the new power plant… some professional help… to negotiate a deal with them.”

“How soon is that going to be done?” asks Council President John Pacheco.

“Not right away,” answers Wood, “But it should be on our radar screen. Probably within a year.”

“I’m sorry,” says a female town councilor (either Kimberly Brissette Brown or Michelle Bouchard), “What power plant are you talking about?”

“Invenergy,” answers Wood, spelling it out for clarification. “I-N-V-E-N-E-R-G-Y.”

The discussion then turns to the protesters who walked 28 miles, from Burrillville to Providence, in protest of the expansion of the compressor station in Burrillville. Wood laughs when he is asked, “Did those protesters ever make it to Providence?”

Contrary to Council President John Pacheco’s statement last week, the videos make clear that not only was the town council, as a whole, aware that Invenergy was planning to build a power plant in Burrillville, they have been actively involved with the project for months prior to its public announcement.

It also appears that Town Manager Michael Wood suggested the idea of using the MTBE contaminated water to cool the plant, one of the most controversial and potentially dangerous aspects of the plan. If the water isn’t filtered properly or cannot be filtered, dangerous levels of MTBE water will be dumped into the Clear River or released as airborne steam, potentially threatening the health and safety of thousands of Rhode Islanders.

At no time is the idea of not bringing the new power plant to Burrillville discussed by the Town Council. The idea of opposing the plant never seems to have occurred to them.

Many voters in Burrillville are aware of these videos and their faith in their Town Council and state representatives has been severely challenged or even shattered.

Council President John Pacheco III and the other councilors did not seem very receptive to the concerns of the citizens in attendance. In response to questions raised at previous meetings about half the town council recently toured the Spectra plant and examined the work being done on the pipeline. They left satisfied that the pipes were not corroding and that the noise levels were within acceptable limits.

One town councilor said that during the tour they were told that Spectra was digging up some pipelines, so the noise was louder than usual. She seemed surprised that those in attendance laughed. But it was less funny when the town council revealed that all the information they have on Spectra’s actions and all the information they have on safety and public health issues comes from Spectra, and there are no other sources of information available.

“We have no legal authority to regulate or look at their reports,” said Pacheco, “We have to rely on Spectra.”

This was the refrain of the Burrillville Town Council throughout the meeting. Only FERC (the Federal Energy Regulatory Agency) can regulate Spectra, claims the town council. Spectra doesn’t even have to obey the town’s noise ordinances. “We don’t have control over Spectra and we can’t enforce local ordinances” against them, said Town Councilor David Place.

Meanwhile the vibrations from the pipeline compressors are so overpowering that plates rattle in the cabinets of Kathy Sherman’s home, who lives across the street from Spectra, she said. She warned the town council that there may be dire impacts on Burrillville due to Spectra’s expansion that have nothing to do with health or the environment.

“When you have people leaving, not paying their taxes, you will suffer for that,” she said.

Said Kathy Martley of BASE, “The value of this town is going into the toilet. I urge you to pass a resolution to oppose this power plant.” The crowd overwhelmingly agreed, applauding and cheering Martley’s words. But the town council seemed unwilling to be moved by their voters.

“FERC and the governor have all the power,” says Councilor Nancy Binns, “we don’t.”

Several times Council President Pacheco tried to close off comment, and several times those in attendance had to insist on being heard. “Why don’t we get to vote on this?” asked a man at the back of the crowd, “Newport votes on gambling over and over again, but we just have to accept this?”

Instead of addressing the man’s concerns, Councilor Stephen Rawson insisted that discussing the new power plant would be illegal, since it’s not on the agenda, only the pipeline expansion is. This was news to Kathy Martley of BASE, who told me after the meeting that she’s pretty sure she asked that both items be on tonight’s docket.

Spectra held an open meeting recently in Burrillville. Residents were annoyed that “union people” holding signs in support of Spectra arrived early and took up all the parking spaces at the too small venue. Others complain that they don’t get proper notification about meetings from Spectra.

“Don’t you get notification of meetings?” asks a councilor.

“NO!” shouts virtually everyone in frustration.

“We asked about their notification process,” says Councilor Donald Fox, “they admitted that they aren’t as good as they used to be.”

Meanwhile, says Kathy Sherman, “No one from Spectra will return calls.”

The Town Councilors don’t want to be discussing this. They claim to be powerless in the face of Spectra. They recommend contacting Governor Gina Raimondo or State Representative Cale Keable. A man behind me says, referring to Keable, “He’s useless.”

Burrillville is home to two interstate methane gas pipelines, two methane gas compressor stations and the Ocean State power plant. Spectra Energy’s compressor station is already being expanded and a second expansion has been proposed. The proposed “Clear River” power plant plans to use Pascoag’s MBTE (methyl tert-butyl ether) tainted water supply for cooling.

In their press release, BASE suggested three things the town council could do in opposition to new methane energy infrastructure:

-Invenergy, the company that wants to build the plant, will try to negotiate with the town for a lower tax rate. If the Town refuses to negotiate with Invenergy and refuses to give them a tax break, the plant won’t be built.

-The Town will be asked by State agencies to submit official opinions about the power plant. If the Town Council says that they are against the plant, the State permits might not get approved.

-The power plant would need huge amounts of water to operate. The town has some power to deny Invenergy access to the local water supply and the pipes that will be needed to transport the water.

Amanda, another member of BASE, wants to know what the town council has done to move Burrillville towards a renewable energy future. After a few minutes of prevaricating, Councilor David Place is forced to admit that they’ve done almost nothing.

Invenergy also builds renewable energy power plants says Amanda, before demanding that the town council tell Invenergy to, “go solar or go home!”

After public comment on the subject is finally closed, and the citizens leave the building and gather outside on the sidewalk, no one seems happy with the performance of the town council. There is anger and frustration and talk of electing town councilors willing to stand with them against Spectra and Invenergy.

“When I started this two years ago, they could ignore me,” says Kathy Martley, of BASE, “They can’t ignore us any more.”