Inaugural Ocean State Oyster Festival a success


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Oysters from Salt Water Farms,  ready to be eaten.
Oysters from Salt Water Farms, ready to be eaten.

Saturday marked the first ever Ocean State Oyster Festival, celebrating the resurgent and exploding oyster industry in Rhode Island, held at the Riverwalk in Providence.

Attendees were both curious and hungry. Smiles and a light-hearted attitude infected all those wandering around the festival looking for the next shellfish to slurp.

“For me it’s the history, the direct heritage of it all,” said Steven Thompson, a Warren Town Council member who spoke at length the “rebuilding” of the oyster industry in his town, which he said was “decimated”and is now growing again.

Farms from across the Ocean State came to display and provide the all-important oysters while music played and smiles were brought to nearly every face.

Oysters on ice from Salt Pond Oysters, shucked and ready for slurping.
Oysters on ice from Salt Pond Oysters, shucked and ready for slurping.

Oysters are a cornerstone of Rhode Island heritage. According to the Ocean State Oyster Festival oyster farming as far back as 1900 was a thriving industry in RI, Point Judith Pond provided an unmatched bounty of oysters. The industry grew fast with the exponential boom putting immense pressure on local oyster populations. Over fishing decimated the shellfish nearly driving them into extinction. The growth of industry drove itself into near collapse.

About 20 years ago Rhode Island sustainable aquaculture movement began and sparked the current oyster farming climate.

“It’s blowin’ up. From a few farms 15 years ago to now almost 50,” said Travis Lundgre, an employee of Salt Pond Oysters.

When asked why he loves it Lundgre said, “The calm of it all. Oyster farming is just different, different from every other kind of farming.”

Jesse Kwan, of the Oyster Country Club, called them “the foundation of the oceans.”

Smiles at the festIn Rhode Island, oysters are the quintessential local food, with nearly every farm supplying restaurants around the state almost exclusively. Some of the larger farms, including Salt Pond Oysters, Walrus & Carpenter Oysters, and Salt Water Farms, do export their stock to other states and around the country as well.

“You could eat one and I could eat one and we’d taste two different things,” said Lauren Nutini of Salt Water Farms, the largest oyster farm in Rhode Island.

With programs like the Blount Shellfish Hatchery at Roger Williams University, Blount Fine Foods, based in Warren, provided the endowment to create the only shellfish hatchery in Rhode Island. Warren was historically an oyster farming community and now that same community is pulling together in efforts to restore the oyster farms.

Tents and PeopleThe farms themselves use sustainable farming techniques to ensure the oysters not only thrive but provide a healthy ecosystem around them.  One such practice is “reseeding” or pouring the old shells back into the farms allowing the baby shellfish something to latch onto and grow before popping off and being harvested.

Oysters filter nearly 50 gallons of water a day, with some farms having 6 million animals, that’s over 300 million gallons of water being cleaned cumulatively a day for years as they mature and grow.

“There’s nothing better after a day at the beach,” said attendee Fred Jodry, “It’s a mouthful of the ocean.” Jodry explained his intrigue with the resurgence of oyster farming in Rhode Island. “Industry took it out, and it’s nice to see this coming back.”

People enjoying the sun and seafood.
People enjoying the sun and seafood.

A good year for Grow Smart?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Scott Wolf, the executive director of Grow Smart Rhode Island, said there were some big wins for sustainable and equitable development in the last legislative session. RhodeMapRI was not one of them, he acknowledged.

Grow Smart RI's logo, courtesy of http://www.growsmartri.org/
Grow Smart RI’s logo, courtesy of http://www.growsmartri.org/

“A lot of the economic development proposals that we thought were good for smart growth passed,” Wolf said. “Those are embodied primarily in Governor Raimondo’s economic development package.”

He mentioned funding to incentivize development on the I-195 land, a fund for streetscape improvements on main streets of cities and towns, special incentives towards transit development, and others.

But the Rebuild RI tax credit could be the most impactful piece of the governor’s economic development package, he said. In its final form, there are opportunities for small historic rehabilitation projects, something that Grow Smart advocated for, and spoke to the Raimondo administration about.

“If the Rebuild RI tax credit does provide significant opportunities for large and small historic rehab projects, then that could be the single most important item,” Wolf said. “It provides continuing state incentives for redeveloping some of our tremendous collection of historic buildings, most of which are located in urban areas, many in distressed urban areas.”

Wolf added that the tax credit program also provides funding for the redevelopment of vacant lots in cities and towns. These lots could be turned into a number of things for public use, but Grow Smart is advocating for some to be converted into grocery stores, as many urbanites have difficulties accessing one.

“As a group that wants to see development occur primarily in cities versus rural areas, we think that this Rebuild RI tax credit is going to stimulate that kind of development,” Wolf said.

Looking toward the future, Grow Smart has plans for the short and long term. For the rest of the year, they’ll be focusing on educating towns and municipalities about the new tools they have, such as the Rebuild RI tax credit, to implement smart growth standards in their public centers.

“Our focus for the next four or five months is going to be to try to make sure that municipalities and developers, both for profit and nonprofit, that are interested in rehabilitating specific historic structures, fully understand how they can facilitate that through the Rebuild RI program,” Wolf said.

During this time, Grow Smart will become a resource for these groups to ensure that their process goes smoothly, but also to get as many historic rehab projects approved as possible. They’ll also be providing assistance for some of the bond issues that were passed last November, especially an environmental bond that includes $5 million for the redevelopment of contaminated sites, or brown fields. Wolf said that this bond is a big step forward, since it’s the first time that state money has gone toward such a project.

Wolf added that Grow Smart also plans to work with the governor’s administration to develop a technical assistance for local governments so they can better use the new tools that have been given to them for redevelopment, such as tax increment financing, which can be used to put the funds together for brownfield development.

In the long term, Wolf said they have several goals, but they all boil down to building a stronger economy, while maintaining Rhode Island’s personality. This all includes employment for city residents, strengthening farms and locally produced agriculture, and a more user-friendly transportation system.

“In a broad sense, our in Rhode Island, and the work nationally in the smart growth movement, is about changing the predominant development pattern in America, which has existed for the past 70 years or so, which has been a very auto dependent, suburban oriented development pattern,” he said. “We’re not anti suburban, and we’re not anti auto, but we think that we need a more balanced approach than what we’ve had in the state and in the country for decades.”

A successful year can’t happen without some marked failures, though. Grow Smart was a staunch supporter of Governor Raimondo’s RhodeWorks legislation, which tore a rift between the House and Senate last session. While the revised bill passed in the Senate, it didn’t even reach the floor in the House, with Speaker Mattiello urging for further study. The bill would use tolls on tractor-trailer trucks to cover the costs of rebuilding deficient bridges, as well as support a more modern transit system.

“We’re disappointed it didn’t pass both houses, but we think there’s a good chance it’s going to be approved either later this year or early next year. We’re working with the Raimondo administration, especially the state department of transportation, on that proposal,” Wolf said.

He was also disappointed that there was not a specific and significant commitment to multi-year funding for historical rehabilitation projects added to the state historic tax credit program.

RhodeMap RI was presented another sticky situation for Grow Smart. While it did pass as legislation, Wolf explained that there was so much controversy around the bill that it became hard to use it as the basis for any policy decisions. The bill included expansions for affordable housing, which conservative activists called “socialist,” fearing the takeover of municipal zoning regulations.

Although the plan was ultimately approved, Grow Smart’s main concern after the public uproar it caused was that it would sit on a shelf and have no policy effect whatsoever. However, Governor Raimondo’s economic development package includes many of the basic priorities that Rhode Map sought to achieve, and which Grow Smart supports.

“Our main commitment was to the goals and the proposed policies of RhodeMap, not to RhodeMap, the name or the brand,” Wolf said. “Our goal this sessions was to get as many of the initiatives that are in the spirit of Rhode Map approved as possible, and a lot of the governor’s economic development package is in that spirit.”

“If decoupling these ideas from RhodeMap is what’s necessary, politically, to have them enacted, then that’s a small price to pay,” Wolf added.

Even with the stigma surrounding RhodeMap, and the limbo that RhodeWorks currently lies in, Wolf said he is still very comfortable calling this legislative session a success for Grow Smart. As far as next year is concerned, their goals are still in the planning stage. For now, Grow Smart celebrates what they’ve already won, and not the battle ahead.

Protestors combat fracking in Rhode Island with Burriville power plant


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

After a fittingly stormy Tuesday morning, Governor Gina Raimondo announced a controversial plan at the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce to open a natural gas power plant in Burriville amid environmental protests and citizen complaints.

Protestors rally in front of Providence Chamber of Commerce as Gov. Raimondo announces Clear River Energy Center
Protestors rally in front of Providence Chamber of Commerce as Gov. Raimondo announces Clear River Energy Center

The plant, called the Clear River Energy Center, would utilize fracking to generate energy with natural gas. Fracking is a process that involves drilling into the earth, and then shooting a high-pressure water mixture at the rock to release the natural gas inside. Environmentalists have opposed the practice for a number of reasons. First, the process uses huge amounts of water that must be transported to the site. Second, many worry that dangerous chemicals used in the process may contaminate groundwater around the site. There are also concerns that fracking causes small earthquakes.

The company that is sponsoring and privately funding the $700 million project, Invenergy, says that the practice is clean and environmentally friendly because the new plant will prevent older, less efficient plants from emitting pollutants like carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and sulphur oxides into the air.

Invenergy has predicted $280 million in energy savings for Rhode Islanders once the energy center is up and running. There would be an overall economic impact of $1.3 billion between 2016 and 2034. Roughly 300 construction jobs would be added to the state’s workforce to build the facility, over a 30 month time period. There would also be 25-30 permanent, skilled positions to actually run the center.

“The construction of this clean energy generation facility will create hundreds of jobs while delivering more affordable and reliable energy to our businesses and homes,” Governor Raimondo said. “We are tackling our regional energy challenges, committing to cleaner energy systems in the long-term, and putting Rhode Islanders back to work.”

Even with this promise of clean energy, there are still many staunch opponents to the proposed facility. Fighting Against Natural Gas, or FANG, held an emergency rally in front of the Chamber of Commerce as Governor Raimondo unveiled her plan. Some even believed the facility to be a “rape” of Burriville’s air, water, and soil.

Robert Malin from Rhode Island’s chapter of the Sierra Club attended the protest, in opposition to the proposed facility. Malin believes that the government has been less than forthcoming with details for the project, and shouldn’t be trusted.

More protestors rallying against Burriville fracking.
More protestors rallying against Burriville fracking.

“The Governor has been saying that she doesn’t know anything about gas or fracking, and that this whole thing is just one little expansion that they’re doing, and by the way, we don’t have any money to build out the renewables, it’s a wish. Maybe in 20 years we’ll get around to actually doing it,” he said. “Then the next thing you know, they can dig into their pockets, they can pull out $700 million, and this thing that they’re planning, had to be planned in advance. They kept this whole thing under the table. Why wasn’t the public able to decide whether we want an explosive power plant building, bringing fracked gas, a deadly practice that was outlawed in New York state, that’s what we’re bringing.”

Malin explained that even though many don’t consider natural gas a fossil fuel, believing it lacks a carbon footprint, the energy source actually leaves what he called a “ghost footprint,” and still contributes to global warming.

“You’re trying to track a colorless, odorless gas,” he said. “Unfortunately, when it gets into the atmosphere, it’s called an accelerant to global warming. So, if you can imagine, you’ve got a big wood fire, and you take some gasoline and throw it on the fire. It flares up really quick. So if you’re not right there when you’re measuring it, when it flares up, then it’s very hard to track. The bad new is that it has the same carbon footprint as other fossil fuels, like coal and oil when it’s done.”

Stephen Dahl, from Fossil Free Rhode Island, said that Raimondo’s plan is short term, and that there are better options and avenues for the state to undertake.

“I think that is a very short gain that they are playing. In the short term, we’ll have jobs. For the longer term, if we follow countries like Germany and Scandinavia, and their mix of energies, in which we can build a transition to 100 percent wind, water, and solar for all purposes, both residential and commercial, here in Rhode Island, by 2050,” he said. “I understand that she has a limited term in office, and she wants to get something done. The way she’s chosen forward, though, is unfortunately, that short-term prospect, which will bring us more catastrophes. So, I object to it.”

Raimondo, and Invenergy’s Founder and CEO Michael Polsky both insisted that fracking, in combination with renewable energy sources, is only one of many puzzle pieces that can be put together to help slow climate change. According to Invenergy, the Clear River Energy Center will add more than 900 megawatts of new, cleaner energy to the regional energy grid, and will displace older, less efficient plants. It will also invest in well treatment and system upgrades, which will benefit 1,200 Pascoag Utility District water customers by contracting on a long-term basis for industrial water supply. Commercial benefits for the town of Burriville include millions of dollars in tax revenue, as well as the reduction of the property tax burden for homeowners.

Once approved, the Clear River Energy Center will begin construction in 2016, with operations scheduled to begin by summer 2019.

Office of Energy Resources proposes $14 million for clean energy investments


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The Rhode Island Office of Energy Resources has announced a plan to invest in clean energy, as well as reduce energy costs, by distributing $14 million in proceeds from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) auctions.

Commissioner Marion Gold, courtesy of www.energy.ri.gov
Commissioner Marion Gold, courtesy of www.energy.ri.gov

RGGI, which was launched in 2009, allowed participating states to establish a cap on carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fueled electric generating facilities. The power plants in these areas must possess a tradable carbon dioxide allowance for each ton that they emit, and these allowances are distributed through quarterly auctions.

“Rhode Island’s participation in RGGI is a vital component of the state’s energy and environmental policy framework. This plan will not only advance important energy goals, but it will also contribute to local economic growth by investing in carbon-free energy resources, including energy efficiency and renewable generation,” State Energy Commissioner Marion Gold said.

The $14 million will support a number of clean energy programs. Three million will support the capitalization of the Rhode Island Infrastructure Bank, and another $3.6 million will go towards supporting energy efficiency measures for residential, commercial, and industrial consumers. Two million more will support the installation of LED streetlights throughout the state, as well as support clean energy investments in state and municipal buildings. Another $300,000 will go toward funding residential rooftop solar panels.

LED streetlights will also be installed all along Rhode Island’s highways, not just within towns and cities. $2.8 million will be allocated towards that venture. Rhode Island Department of Transportation Director Peter Alviti said that energy efficiency is a top priority.

“The conversion to LED streetlights not only has the potential of reducing statewide energy costs by approximately one million dollars per year, but it also demonstrates the financial benefits of good environmental stewardship,” he said.

The Office of Energy Resources also stated that the plan will support job growth along with enhancing sustainability.

“This is a smart plan that will grow jobs, reduce energy costs, and help protect our environment,” Governor Gina Raimondo said. “By investing in innovative clean energy initiatives like the Rhode Island Infrastructure Bank, Solarize Rhode Island, and energy efficiency programs, Rhode Island can help lead the nation towards a more sustainable energy future while also growing our economy.”

The financial impact is only one part, though. These investments also have the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which will improve air quality throughout Rhode Island

“Each kilowatt-hour of energy saved or generated by a renewable energy source means one less kilowatt-hour generated from fossil fuel-fired sources,” said Department of Environmental Management Director Janet Coit. “Programs like these may start small, but the represent important steps forward toward achieving our greenhouse gas reduction goals and transitioning to a clean energy future.”

The Office of Energy Resources is currently taking public comment on the plan, and can be reached by emailing Barbara.Cesaro@energy.ri.gov, or by mailing One Capitol Hill, Providence, Rhode Island, 02908. There will be a public hearing on the proposal on July 29 at 10 am in Conference Room B on the second floor of One Capitol Hill.

 

Elorza launches green initiative for Providence


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Image courtesy of https://www.facebook.com/sustainPVD

Providence Mayor Jorge Elorza has taken a step towards a more environmentally friendly city with his new SustainPVD Environmental Program. The goal of the program is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and address climate change within the city by increasing recycling, expanding composting, and making municipal buildings more energy efficient. Residents can participate as well, by obtaining a home energy assessment at no cost through National Grid’s EnergyWise program, and by finding low to no-cost energy saving opportunities by joining Find Your Four. Residents can register here or here.

Residents are also encouraged to explore solar alternatives. To get a free solar energy assessment, sign up by July 31 by contacting the West Broadway Neighborhood Association at 401-831-9344, or WBNA@WBNA.org.

“Climate change poses significant challenges to Providence in terms of its effect on our waterfront, the impacts of extreme heat, and especially on vulnerable populations,” Mayor Elorza said of the program.

In order to help promote the initiative, Elorza received an energy audit from National Grid in his own home on Tuesday-his first after living there for ten years.

“Through my home energy and solar assessments, I learned how I can make a difference and even save money along the way. I encourage all residents to do the same and help Providence become a greener, healthier, more livable city.”

Providence ranks 32nd in the 51 largest cities in the country for energy efficiency, according to a report by the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy. The report factored in government operations, community-wide efforts, buildings policies, utilities, and transportation.

‘Environment is Everyone’s Business’ rally draws a crowd to the State House


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9903If there was one message that came through loud and clear from the 22 speakers at the Environment is Everyone’s Business rally held on the south lawn of the State House Wednesday evening, it was that the time to take serious action on climate change is running out, if the time hasn’t already passed. Over 150 people attended the event – people anxious for real leadership, on a state level, on such issues as renewable energy, rising sea levels, storm preparedness and greening the economy.

Robert Malin, on the executive committee of the RI Sierra Club, organized the event. At one point he apologized to the crowd for the seemingly never ending supply of speakers, but as he said, usually he asks a bunch of people, and most can’t come. This time, nearly everyone he asked to speak made time to be at the rally. Perhaps the people closest to the problem understand that time is truly running out?

Penn Johnson supplied some warm up entertainment…

…then Ray “Two Hawks” Watson sang a Native American song.

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9591

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9596

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9939

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9928

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9918

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9916

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9911

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9906

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9900

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9885

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9855

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9844

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9837

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9823

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9818

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9803

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9793

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9786

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9781

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9762

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9757

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9755

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9738

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9732

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9730

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9725

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9722

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9708

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9699

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9695

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9689

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9677

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9672

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9661

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9660

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9657

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9646

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9644

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9639

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9635

2015-06-10 Environment Rally 9613

Patreon

Greg Gerritt’s speech for Sierra Club State House rally


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Greg Gerritt

You can not heal ecosystems without ending poverty, you can not end poverty without healing ecosystems, and if you do not shut down the war machine, you will not do any of it.

I thought about what to say, and could easily give you a stump speech, but instead today I want to challenge you to think about something not really on the radar … the End of Economic Growth.

Ecosystems are in collapse, primarily to feed the ever-expanding maw of consumerism. We must have MORE. And without MORE civilization will end. Excuse me, but what planet are they living on?

Here on Earth, we need to use less, and considering how many people really do NEED more, then the one percent and the middle class in the industrial world are going to have to use less.

Some people think that is impossible or it would be horrible. But we have to think about prosperity rather than growth. We have to reduce inequality, heal ecosystems, close the war machine, create zero carbon emissions, reforest and farm our sprawl. Not build shopping centers or the next big thing.

There is much spending we could easily eliminate in ways that mean a happier, healthier, and more vibrant community while spending less money and refusing to exploit workers around the world.

For Providence’s prosperity start with food security and turn the I-195 land into farms, not biomedical labs or baseball stadiums. If we keep thinking economic development starts with real estate speculation and subsidies for the rich, we shall be stuck forever. If we think we need to relax environmental protections to grow the economy faster, remind yourself that for 99 percent of us growth left town years ago, and ecosystem health underlies our prosperity.

The I-195 land is a brownfield, and I agree that brownfields are among the keys to the future of the RI economy, but not how the clowns on Smith Hill think about it, where giving subsidies and tax breaks to the rich is the only thing on the table.

I want you to think about the connection between brownfields and tropical forests. The 195 land destroyed neighborhoods 50 years ago, so it is hard to think about the people who lived there, but think about a place like Olneyville where the brownfields still are embedded in a neighborhood. Who lives there, and who will benefit from Brownfield redevelopment?

Now think about forests. Forest health may be the most important indicator of ecosystem health on Earth, and no one has ever figured out how to build cities without a new supply of wood. Now think about the people who live in forests, who are often the most marginalized and disenfranchised people in a country, just like those who live near brownfields. Usually the wood supply was obtained by genocide.

With the forest more than half gone and our ever growing understanding of how important forest are to our communities people are wondering how to keep the forests healthy. The World Bank did a study and figured out that the best way to preserve forests and help forest communities escape poverty is to give the forest dwellers secure tenure, and then make sure that any economic development projects keep the benefits in the hands of the poorest people in the community, usually women.

Brought to Providence it is clear that as long as the benefits from the development of brownfields is directed towards the speculators and the inside dealers (the same people who steal forests from the people who live there) instead of the benefits staying in the hands of the people in the community, our wealth gap will get worse, our economy and ecosystems will crumble and the world will be a more violent place.

Keep the Pawsox in Pawtucket and make sure the benefits of redevelopment flow to the poor, not the rich. This is how you heal ecosystems and create prosperous communities. And one day I hope the clowns of Smith Hill will begin to comprehend.

https://youtu.be/luqAtrR566c

Study shows carbon tax would bring 2,000-4,000 jobs to RI


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Graphic courtesy of EnergizeRI
Graphic courtesy of EnergizeRI

A new study says a carbon tax in the state would create between 2,000 and 4,000 jobs, as well as create up to $900 million in state revenue by 2040. Scott Nystrom, a senior economic associate and project manager for Regional Economic Models, Inc. presented the study’s findings at Brown University.

Sponsored by the Energize Rhode Island Coalition, REMI’s study examined the possible benefits and consequences of instituting such a tax in the state.

Introduced this year, the Carbon Pricing Act has been tabled for the session but will be resubmitted next year. The bill, if passed, would be the first of its kind in the United States, setting an environmental standard for the rest of the country. More information can be found here.

Energize Rhode Island is currently promoting the Clean Energy Investment and Carbon Pricing Act, which would impose a carbon price (or tax) on all fossil fuels at the first point of sale within the state. The price would be $15 per ton of carbon dioxide for the first year the act is in effect, and raise at a rate of $5 per year.

The Carbon Pricing Act has two main goals – to provide a disincentive for using fossil fuel revenue to compensate for the cost of moving toward green energy. The price would be returned to Rhode Island’s economy in four different ways: a dividend check to households, a dividend to employers based on their share of state employment, a fund for energy efficiency costs, and administrative overhead.

According to REMI’s analysis, Rhode Island would receive positive benefits from implementing a carbon price.

“You actually have more jobs in Rhode Island that you would have otherwise with this policy,” Nystrom said during his presentation. Although the impact is relatively small, only around 1 percent of the jobs in the state, that’s still 2,000 to 4,000 jobs that were not there before. The Coalition says 1,000 of these jobs would be created within the first two years of the price’s introduction.

Total gross state product would rise as well, with the construction industry gaining roughly $86 million. The only industry that takes a serious hit due to the price is chemical manufacturing, which would lose $16 million. Real personal income would also increase between $80 and $100 million dollars during that time.

Nystrom also explained that instituting a carbon price could result in a population increase.

“Because the labor market is stronger, it draws more people to the state to an extent,” he said. “They move into the state as a consequence of the labor market, they buy a house, they settle down, and they increase the state’s population.”

With all of the new jobs and people living in Rhode Island, state revenues would be on the rise as well, earning between $200 and $900 million through the 2030s.

For all these benefits, cost of living would only increase minimally.

“Even though this does increase the cost of energy for states, It’s about a half a percent,” Nystrom said. “This means you have three months of extra inflection between now and 2040 than you would have otherwise.”

Carbon emissions were not the main focus of the study, but Nystrom did add that they would decrease over the course of a few years, and then stabilize.

“Emissions are purely a byproduct,” he said. “This is a result of the model.”

A cleaner Rhode Island through carbon pricing


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Graphic courtesy of the Rhode Island Carbon Pricing Coalition
Graphic courtesy of the Rhode Island Carbon Pricing Coalition

The Carbon Pricing and Clean Energy Investment Act bill before the General Assembly has two goals. The first is to create a tax on fossil fuels – coal, oil, natural gas, petroleum – during their first point of entry within the state, which would be $15 per ton of carbon dioxide that would be released by the burning fuel.

The second goal is to use the money collected from the tax to set up the Clean Energy Fund. Money from the fund would be used to coordinate and invest in development research and commercialization of different green practices, including energy storage, wind and solar energy, and “other projects that are deemed to be potentially revolutionary breakthroughs in clean energy technology,” as stated by the bill.

Other uses for the Clean Energy Fund would be paying for the administrative costs associated with collecting the tax, funding programs to assist in the installation of clean energy technology, contributing to a green bank in the state, or investing in public transportation. The fund will also provide dividends to households and businesses for the first two months of 2016, in order to avoid financial harm to them because of the carbon price.

Goldstein-Rose stated that the bill presents a unique opportunity for Rhode Island, because it will make the state one of the frontrunners in addressing climate change.

“Rhode Island can be the first state to pass a carbon pricing bill, catalyzing momentum for other states and national legislation to follow – essentially doing what we did for gay marriage, for clean energy,” he said. “We can also make our state a center for clean energy development and sustainable towns, which we’re already starting to do by being the first state to build an offshore wind farm, and which we can go farther with by passing a carbon pricing bill.”

The bill is being sponsored by Rep. Dan McKiernan and Sen. Walter Felag,. Felag said the bill will be heard in Senate Finance at the end of April.

The information session to be held on Saturday is hosted by the Rhode Island Carbon Pricing and Green Jobs Coalition, which is a group dedicated to making Rhode Island a national leader in reducing carbon pollution, as well as strengthening the local economy. It will take place at 1 pm in room 106 of the Urban Environmental Laboratory at 135 Angell Street in Providence.

Not all impervious surfaces equal when it comes to stormwater


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

stormwaterCentral Falls, Cranston, East Providence, North Providence, Pawtucket, Providence, and Warwick belong to the upper Narragansett Bay watershed. All of these communities except North Providence have been cooperating in studies of how to prevent stormwater overflow in the region. Phase I of the study is already complete, and Phase II is being worked on. Phase I essentially explores the problem, while Phase II will look into proactive solutions.

The problem, summarized briefly, is that the more impermeable surfaces the region has, the more of our fecal matter goes into the bay when it rains. The plan is to think strategically as a region about how to address the amount of impermeable surfaces we have.

A stormwater management district will assess some kind of fee, usually in people’s water bill, according to what kind of impermeable surfaces the user has. Ratepayers will be able to get credits for improvements to their properties that fix their stormwater issues. Assigning appropriate fees and credits is paramount.

But impervious surfaces aren’t all equally bad.

None the less, frequently advocates have turned to a measure of success based on the percentage of land that is impermeable, with the target percentage being under 10 percent. Percentages hide more than they show:

Screen Shot 2015-01-12 at 4.14.41 PM
Stormwater stats: I apologize for image quality. A better view of this is on p. 24 of the report. Click the image for the report.

Percentages lie

The highest percentage of impermeable surfaces in the region is in Central Falls, at 66.4%. Providence and Pawtucket are close behind. By contrast, suburban areas like Cranston, East Providence, and Warwick look to have half as much impermeable surface percentage covered.

If you look at the absolute surface area that is covered, it’s clear that Central Falls has the least area that is impervious. In a way this is common sense, because Central Falls is small, but the intuitive thinking about protecting water from overflow pollution is that a lower percentage is better. A really stark illustration of this is in the contrast between Warwick and Providence, for instance. Providence is almost twice as impervious as Warwick by percentage, but by absolute area the two are about equal!

Absolute numbers aren’t even giving the full picture.

If you go deeper still, you see that the per person impervious area is very small in the dense cities, and very high in the suburbs. Each of the 19,378 Central Falls residents has about three-hundredths of an acre of impervious surface to their name. In Warwick, it’s almost a full tenth of an acre per person, about three times as much per capita.

Not all impermeable surfaces are equal

Not every square foot of impermeability is equal, and a future stormwater district should not treat them as such. These images are roughly to scale (100 ft level on Google Maps). The top image is part of Warwick Mall, and the bottom one is part of Downcity, Providence. It’s really a toss-up as to which one has more impermeable surfaces. I might be inclined to guess that Providence has slightly less green space in this shot. It’s a clincher. But it’s very clear which neighborhood is making productive use of land.

Screen Shot 2015-01-12 at 4.54.35 PMScreen Shot 2015-01-12 at 5.01.17 PM

Incentivizing behavior

Phase II of the study, which is not yet completed, will look at solutions. We should be on top of this process to make sure that it incentivizes the right behavior, instead of green-washing the problem.

The Providence image shows that past errors have led to some knocked out teeth in the downtown, now as “temporary” surface lots. A stormwater district should make it clear that it is a positive benefit to the community to redevelop a surface lot into a building, even if the exact same impermeable surface remains. Surface lots don’t just create their own individual problems, but are the lead on land use and transportation misalignments across the board. When there’s a lot of parking, fewer people can live in downtown, and more people will need to drive, leading to wider roads.

The only policy measure floated about parking in the report is about using more permeable surfaces for lots (Central Falls already does this at its Ledge Street municipal lot). On page 87-88, the report states:

It is not enough to simply provide funding for the stormwater program, property owners need to help manage stormwater on-site, at the point it is generated. For example, roof runoff can be directed to a dry well on the property, and depending on the size, parking lot runoff can also be “disconnected” by draining to a lawn area, rain garden or other on-site infiltration or treatment system. Improvements made by property owners reduce the volume of runoff that must be managed by the town and thus reduce the town’s overall stormwater program costs.

To me, this line is like trying to trot out the best new fashions in colostomy bags in lieu of offering preventative measures against colon cancer. Why would we make deeper investments into unproductive land uses in order to deal with a surface symptom of the problems they cause?

The surface lot in the image of the Warwick  Mall, which is only a tiny piece of the much larger lot, is not something to be tweaked with an underground treatment system. Of course, kudos on making the owner of such a lot pay for the system him/herself, because it’s much better than having ratepayers see increases in their water bills. But the true solution we should be pushing for is recognizing the cancer of surface parking as what it is so that we can root it out.

Houston, we have a problem

We should look to our past mistakes with stormwater management to make sure we don’t repeat them. Houston is a stunning reminder that not all impermeable surfaces are the same. Houston had a huge stormwater pollution problem, which the EPA approached by disallowing new stresses to the sewer system (i.e., buildings with sewer connections) unless other stresses (other buildings) were removed. Houston developers replied to this well-intentioned regulation by tearing out neighborhoods and replacing them with towers in glimmering fields of asphalt parking lots. The problem remains to this day, and Houston’s downtown would make Warwick Mall blush.

The problem is discussed at some length in this Streetfilms video on parking craters.

Parking Craters: Scourge of American Downtowns from STREETFILMS on Vimeo.

The approach we take needs to understand that parking and wide roads are some of the biggest and most wasteful public liabilities we have, and that rooftops, though impermeable, are not. A surface lot induces more impermeable surfaces and gives the community nothing in return. A building helps to reduce the need for other surfaces, like roads or lots, by adding density, and gives the community economic development that it can use to eventually pay for even greater improvements, like street trees or green roofs.

This is not an idle point. I’ve only had informal conversations with Providence officials about this, but those officials have expressed a kind of quiet embarrassment about what they see as the city’s being behind on stormwater, and needing to catch up to Warwick and Cranston. With this attitude in hand, I’m concerned about what might result.

We need to make sure that those who are writing a stormwater management system do not blame urban areas by misusing the data, and focusing on percentages of impermeable surfaces. The absolute surface area and the per capita area are far more important. Under this analysis, areas like Central Falls are giving the state a credit through their lifestyle everyday, while residents in Warwick are detracting from the health of the state. The fee system set up for stormwater management should reflect this.

~~~~

Small correction: The Streetfilms video mentions Dallas, not Houston. Although, truth be told, Houston does in fact have the same problem. See for example this post from the Final Four competition at Streetfilms’ sister site, Streetsblog. In any case, the point is that we definitely don’t want to follow Texas in anything land use related. It’s a bad scene all around, and we can do better.

Lobby for the environment at State House Wednesday


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

art handy memeOn Wednesday, April 30th – to cap off Earth Month, and as state lawmakers begin the last leg of the 2014 legislative session – the Environment Council of Rhode Island (ECRI) is holding its annual “Earth Day at the State House” from 2:30 – 4:30.

With the Rhode Island General Assembly considering legislation to cap global warming pollution, expand renewable energy, ban plastic bags, implement statewide composting, and more, this event couldn’t come at a better time. Join environmental advocates, activists, organizations, and concerned citizens to lobby for Rhode Island’s environment and move key policies forward. All are invited, and RSVPs are encouraged.

We’ll have informational tables to educate lawmakers about environmental issues, a speaking program including the House and Senate environment committee chairs and the DEM director, and a group lobbying effort on ECRI’s 2014 legislative agenda, with a focus on six priority bills:

  • The Resilient Rhode Island Act (H7904) to cap global warming pollution and establish infrastructure for climate change adaptation.
  • Food Residuals Recycling (H7033, S2315) to create a statewide organics diversion program to compost food scrap.
  • The Plastic Waste Reduction Act (H7178, S2314) to ban single-use plastic bags from being distributed at point-of-sale in retail establishments.
  • Restoring the state’s Renewable Energy Tax Credit (H7083, S2213), which provides a tax credit for 25% of the cost of residential renewable energy projects.
  • The Distributed Generation Growth Program (H7727, S2690) to extend, expand, and improve Rhode Island’s key program to develop new in-state renewable energy production.
  • The Clean Water, Open Space, and Healthy Communities Bond (Article 5, Question 4 of the Governor’s budget), which would create a November ballot question to authorize the issuance of nearly $100 million in bonds for clean water, green infrastructure, and other environmentally important projects.

To RSVP to lobby and/or request table space at the event, contact Channing atcjones@environmentrhodeisland.org or 684-1668. You can also RSVP and share the event on Facebook.

Wednesday, April 30th; 2:30 – 4:30 pm
Rhode Island State House (82 Smith St. in Providence), main rotunda

Timeline:
– 2:30: participants begin to arrive, tablers set up tables
– 3:00: Lobbying 101 orientation and issue overview
– 3:30: speaking program including State Rep. Art Handy, State Sen. Sue Sosnowski, and DEM Director Janet Coit
– 3:45: group lobbying effort on above bills and/or other environmental issues
~ 4:15: environmental leaders honored on House and Senate floor

As the coalition representing Rhode Island’s environmental community, with over 60 member organizations and individuals, ECRI’s mission is to serve as an effective voice for developing and advocating policies and laws that protect and enhance Rhode Island’s environment.

State lawmakers have a chance this spring to distinguish Rhode Island as an environmental leader. As a dense coastal state, Rhode Island faces a unique set of environmental challenges and opportunities. Protecting Rhode Island’s environment––our air, water, and special places––will improve our quality of life and provide new chances for growth and innovation.

Watch: Civil Disobedience To Stop Keystone Pipeline


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

There will be civil disobedience at the White House today as a part of the build up to the rally this Sunday Feb 17th. This is to remind President Obama that the Keystone XL Pipeline action will show if he is serious about Climate disruption Action.

The Sierra Club has lifted its 115-year ban on civil disobedience for the action as the list of people risking arrest shows just how wide this movement is- reverends, ranchers, NAACP members, Bill McKibben, Michael Brune and Daryl Hannah.

You can watch it live here:

Live broadcast by Ustream

 

Here are some of the participants and their stories.

Abbi Kleinschmidt – farmer from a long line of farmers and ranchers, whose home would be crossed by the Keystone XL pipeline in Nebraska.
“I am fighting the pipeline because I believe it is my duty to stand up for Mother Earth and the health and well-being of all human beings and NOT allow a slimy, rich, foreign oil company to come in and cut through the heart of America. I cannot think of a more heartless act!! I am fortunate to live in a society where I have the right and can speak up for what I believe in. What this situation reminds of more than anything is what our ancestors did to the Native Americans. We came in and told them lies, cheated them, and moved them off of their land. I believe that TransCanada is capable of doing the same sort of thing, especially if there was a sizable tar sands spill. That company is ruthless, relentless, has an endless supply of money and only wants what is good for them. Since our politicians aren’t willing to take the appropriate stand, then power to the people and I would be one of those.”

Adam Werbach  – Co-founder of the sharing startup yerdle.com.  A lifelong environmental activist, Werbach founded the Sierra Student Coalition and was later elected president of the Sierra Club at age 23
“We’ve known all we need to know for decades now. Having spent the majority of my life trying to do something about climate change, I feel like a miserable failure. All of those nights away from my kids, all of those boisterous arguments about text in Kyoto, all of the grand coalitions we built, all of the clever message testing, and yet we’re nowhere near where we need to be. I remember meeting Al Gore in 1986 when I was 13 years old;  he spent a warm Spring afternoon explaining climate change and scaring the living daylights out of me. In 1989 I met Bill McKibben in Vermont at the Mountain School after reading the End of Nature, and I can vividly remember him looking hopefully upon my classmates as if to say, “I’m just a writer, you guys should go do something about this.”  So here I am.  I’ve never been arrested before, even when I served on the international board of Greenpeace. I thought I could achieve more with my voice and my pen. But no longer. I’m humbled to be asked to put my body on the line. I want my kids to know that I did everything in my power to protect them. I only pray our call will be heard.”

Allison Chin  – President of the Sierra Club Board of Directors
“If not now, when?  I’m here to help create the space for President Obama to exercise bold leadership on climate, because I agree with him that, in his own words, “failure to do so would betray our children and future generations.”

Andre Carothers  – Chairman of the Board, Rainforest Action Network
“22 years ago I walked onto the Nevada nuclear test site, and I am honored to return to action now to call on President Obama to take action on the most pressing issue of our time. It is urgent that he take leadership on an issue that does not allow for half measures.”

Julian Bond – Co-founder, Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, Former Executive Director of NAACP.

Betsy Taylor – President of Breakthrough Strategies & Solutions, chair of the 350 Action Fund and founder and former President of 1 Sky.
“What’s best for the oil companies is not what’s best for the American people.  We can’t ignore the reality of destructive weather and we owe it to our kids to protect them.  That means addressing climate disruption before it becomes irreversible.  Fossil fuel companies have a stranglehold on Washington.  Our political system is not responding to the overwhelming evidence of dangerous climate change.  I’m risking arrest because I feel a moral obligation to children and to those just being born. We must disrupt business as usual.  Those who say nothing can be done about climate change forget who we are and what we can do.   But we’re running out of time and we must tap our ingenuity and resolve to turn things around before it is too late.”

Bill McKibben – Author, activist, and co-founder of 350.org
“It is a great privilege to watch the Sierra Club break its century-old ban on civil disobedience–they’d clearly decided that KXL was an issue of such magnitude that we needed to change the way we do business. I hope the president will take a lesson from that. I’m very glad to see leaders and celebrities standing up to Keystone, but I don’t forget for a moment that it was 1,253 ordinary Americans going to jail who built this momentum in the first place. And it’s the tens of thousands who descend on DC this weekend who will push this to the next stage. We really shouldn’t have to be put in handcuffs to stop KXL–our nation’s leading climate scientists have told us it’s dangerous folly, and all the recent Nobel Peace laureates have urged us to set a different kind of example for the world, so the choice should be obvious. But given the amount of money on the other side, we’ve had to spend our bodies, and we’ll probably have to spend them again.”

Bob Haas – professor of poetry and poetics at the University of California, Berkeley, and former poet laureate of the United States

Bobby Kennedy – Senior Attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, Chief Prosecuting Attorney for the Hudson Riverkeeper and President of Waterkeeper Alliance.

Brenda Hillman – Olivia C. Filippi Professor of Poetry, St. Mary’s College in California
“I am joining other activists on Feb 13 out of concern as an educator, as a poet, as a mother and grandmother; I am convinced that the Keystone XL Pipeline represents a dire threat to the future of the planet and to many species in the path of it. We want to urge the President in the strongest possible terms not to approve the Pipeline and to develop energy alternatives that will be safer and will last longer.”

Cherri Foytlin – mother of six and the wife of an oil worker in Rayne, Louisiana. She co-founded Gulf Change, blogs for Bridge The Gulf Project, and walked to D.C. from New Orleans (1,243 miles) to call for action to stop the BP oil disaster.
“With scientists firmly establishing the horrendous effects this pipeline will have on climate change, we must ask the question: Who pays the price? The astounding consequences of weather related disasters, industrial air emissions and possible pollution from leaks will undoubtedly fall to low income and minority communities who already bear the crux of the burden of energy production in this country, and in countries around the globe. We have seen that these encumbrances have profound impact on the health, agriculture and economic struggles of these communities – in spite of their disproportionately smaller contributions to the problem. We must move rapidly and reponsibly toward a transformation in this country; toward a place in time where the societal decision has been made that we will not a sacrifice human lives to the procurement of cheap energy and corporate profit. This fight is no less than the moral struggle of our time.”

Pete Nichols – National Director of Waterkeeper Alliance

Danny Kennedy – President and Co-founder, Sungevity

Daryl Hannah – Actress and activist
“With global super storms floods and drought we are living the disastrous consequences of our actions. The good news is – we have everything at our disposal to turn things around, if we only have the will.  The Keystone XL pipeline, the tar sands strip mine it emanates from and all other forms of extreme extraction we have been increasingly resorting to are a death sentence. now is the time for n energy common sense and justice.”

Eileen Flanagan – Quaker leader representing the Earth Quaker Action Team, which advocates for a just and sustainable economy through nonviolent direct action.
“As I explained to my two children, I’m willing to risk arrest for the first time in my life for them and for the future of all children—from Appalachia to Africa. The urgency of climate change hit home last August when I visited friends in southern Africa and heard meteorologists and farmers talk about how food production has been devastated by new and unpredictable weather patterns. I came home convinced that the most important thing I could do as a citizen of the United States was to stop extreme extraction here. My organization, the Earth Quaker Action Team, is campaigning to get PNC Bank to stop funding mountaintop removal coal mining, and we are proud to stand with allies fighting the Keystone XL pipeline, which is another example of the reckless resource grab that threatens all of us.”

Ellie Cohen – President and CEO of PRBO Conservation Science, guiding PRBO’s 140 scientists to develop climate-smart solutions working hand-in-hand with public and private resource managers, on land and at sea, from California to Antarctica.
“I am here to help ensure that my kids have hope for a healthy future.  I believe we have already passed several climate tipping points globally and are on the path to runaway greenhouse gases that in just 100 year would turn our oceans purple and our atmosphere yellow– making our earth no longer blue from afar.  I deeply believe we can avert climate chaos and we can ensure a healthy, blue planet for all life as we know it but we have to act now, making climate smart actions a part of every sector of society every day.”

Erich Pica – President, Friends of the Earth
“We’ve seen too much inaction on climate change from President Obama and the U.S. Congress. Today I risk arrest with citizens across the country to demonstrate to President Obama that we expect unwavering leadership and that we will not idly accept climate inaction.”

Farhad Ebrahimi – founder and trustee chair of the Chorus Foundation, whose mission is to end the extraction, export, and use of fossil fuels in the United States.
“I’m willing to risk arrest because I don’t think any social movement has ever succeeded without the engagement of large numbers of people in a full range of tactics — including but not limited to civil disobedience. Thoreau put it better than I ever could: “It costs me less in every sense to incur the penalty of disobedience to the State than it would to obey.”

James Hansen – Professor, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences at Columbia University

Jacklyn Gil – junior at Brandeis university studying Peace & Justice studies.  As the daughter of Colombian immigrants and from a family of laborers, issues of economic justice and health equity are close to her heart and have become both academic and personal passions.
“I am happy to risk arrest because elected officials,succumbing to the lobbying demands of the fossil fuel industry, have repeatedly failed to take necessary climate action to ensure that the planet will be a habitable, safe home for my generation and for the ones to come. Rising food prices and increasing adverse health conditions are irrefutable evidence that sufferable climate crisis has already begun and today, I risk arrest as an urgent plea to the youth of the world to take action now in support of a more just, global coexistence – starting with standing firmly against the Keystone XL pipeline.”

Jennifer Krill – Executive Director, Earthworks
“I am going to be there to tell President Obama that we can’t frack our way out of a climate crisis. The story of our dependence on fossil fuels needs a new ending, and that requires a new path away from dirty energy and towards renewables like solar and wind power.”

Jerry Hightower – Texas landowner, fighting a land grab by TransCanada for the southern leg of the Keystone XL pipeline
“I am a Texas born American who loves my state and my country. For the last several months I have had to stand by and watch a land grab occur by a foreign company (Trans Canada) through my entire state and family’s front yard. This is all after President Obama was on the national news stating that he had stopped the pipeline. I want this path of destruction to end.”

Jessica Roff – anti-fracking and climate justice and food justice activist from New York City. She has been a full-time core Occupy Sandy organizer in the Rockaways since the Thursday after the storm.
“Superstorm Sandy literally brought climate change into the homes of thousands of people; I work in the devastation every day. The time is now to take decisive action against climate change if we want to protect our future.”

Jim Tarnick – Nebraska farmer, rancher, whose home would be just 50 feet from the Keystone XL pipeline
“I started out fighting the pipeline because it was coming on my land and close to the family farm house and livestock wells.  However, through what I have learned these past 6-7 months I am against it even more because it will impact us negatively economically in the long run and there are way to many ways it can harm our environment.  Landowners have been bullied by TC as our political leaders have looked the other way.  It is time to and this is an outstanding way to rise up against big money and say ‘We aren’t going anywhere. Ever!’”

Joe Uehlein – Founding President and Executive Director of the Labor Network for Sustainability, former secretary-treasurer of the AFL-CIO’s Industrial Union Department and former director of the AFL-CIO Center for Strategic Campaigns
“Sometimes a decision forces you to think deeply about what you believe in and how you act on those beliefs.   I believe we face an existential challenge that holds great opportunity to build a better world.  Climate change will either consume us, or we will reverse global warming and build a sustainable future for the planet and its people.  We must fight for a Just Transition strategy and for jobs that will truly “pave the way for better days” rather than destroying the future.  We can’t let climate protection make victims of workers who happen through no fault of their own to be in the way of changes that are necessary to protect the climate.  The time to begin drastic reductions in carbon emissions is past — we haven’t a moment to waste.  So, if not now, when?  If not this issue, what issue?  I am marching for the labor movement and its future, and for my daughter.”

Juliet Schor – Professor of Sociology at Boston College, winner of the 2011 Herman Daly Award from the US Society for Ecological Economics, and author, most recently of True Wealth: how and why millions of Americans are creating a time-rich, ecologically-light, small-scale, high-satisfaction economy.
“I am willing to risk arrest because decades of scientific evidence, argument and information have failed to move US elites to protect the planet and the future of humanity. It is clear that we need to take on the fossil-fuel industry, which is acting in a stunningly dangerous and amoral way. History shows us that major social change often requires civil disobedience. I consider this a generational obligation.”

Luis Garden Acosta – American pioneer for community driven, human rights activism. He is the Founder and President of El Puente, a nationally celebrated, Brooklyn based, community/youth development organization.
“Climate Change is the moral issue of the 21st Century. Latinos know the consequences of those who choose profit over principle-toxic neighborhoods and  a devastated Caribbean. It will only stop when we all cry, Basta Ya!”

Maura Cowley – Executive Director, Energy Action Coalition
“At his Inaugural address, the President committed to prioritizing action on climate in his second term. This is the first time in our nation’s history that we have heard such a loud and clear direction set by a President on climate change. The window to act on climate has opened, so now we must act fast to ensure that the President is pushed to make the commitment he made to all of us, and to future generations, as big and bold as possible. Because as he said, it’s our job to push him.”

Michael Kieschnick – CEO, president and co-founder of CREDO/Working Assets, a company dedicated to changing the world through progressive philanthropy and political activism
“I am returning to Washington committed to civil disobedience in opposition to the Keystone XL pipeline, representing the hundreds of thousands of CREDO activists who have marched, rallied, been arrested, called the White House, and petitioned President Obama to simply deny the required permit due to the horrific global warming consequences of saying yes.  As a business leader, I also want to call attention to the fact that strictly from a business point of view, no other possible energy investment could provide fewer jobs or less benefit to the U.S. that this pipeline, which will provide very few permanent jobs and serve only to transport dirty oil through the U.S. to export overseas.”

Mike Brune – Executive Director, The Sierra Club

Mike Tidwell – founder and director of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, as well as an author, filmmaker, and regular commentator on global warming issues for D.C.’s premiere NPR station, WAMU
“Why am I getting locked up on February 13th?: I’m doing this for my 15-year-old son, Sasha, the best curveball-throwing, skateboard-riding, drum-playing, and full-hearted person I’ve ever known. I can’t bear how innocent he is. Sasha: I’m on it”
Pamela Smith-  co-founder and managing member of Regeneration, LLC, which serves as a catalyst for economically sustainable and healthy urban communities by helping public agencies, faith and community-based organizations and businesses build capacity through effective operations and winning partnerships.
“I am joining in this action because I hope to bring light to a critical issue.  An issue that without a concerted effort by those of diverse backgrounds and without our country’s most urgent and immediate attention will continue to put our most vulnerable populations, communities of color and our children, at tremendous risk of environmental health disparities.”

Phaedra Ellis-Lamkins – American sustainability advocate and the CEO of the anti-poverty organization Green For All.
“I’d rather risk going to jail than risk the health and safety of people who would be in harm’s way if the Keystone XL pipeline was built. There are certain points in history, like the Civil Rights Movement, when the consequences of inaction are so great that we must make bold choices. Green For All is standing up to this pipeline because of its devastating consequences to human health, especially for communities of color, who are on the front lines of climate change, and who would be left with toxic air and water as a result of this project.”

Phil Radford – Executive Director, Greenpeace USA
“I am risking arrest because the risk to my family’s future if President Obama doesn’t act is so great that I must act in every way I can to change the path we are on.”

Randy Johnson – cattle buyer, and leader in the campaign in Nebraska to stop the Keystone XL pipeline.
“I am a Nebraska cattleman and landowner. I am fighting against the KXL pipeline for two very basic reasons. First of all, I feel very strongly that this pipeline represents an assault on the individual property rights of American citizens. There is something inherently wrong about the idea of American landowners being forced to subsidize the private enterprise of a foreign corporation with land that their families have earned through generations of hard work and determination. Secondly, I feel that the KXL presents a real threat to some of our nation’s most valuable natural resources, especially our rivers, streams and underground aquifers. These are priceless American assets that no amount of oil money, foreign or otherwise, could ever replace.”

Rev. Jim Antal –  Minister and President of the Massachusetts Conference of the United Church of Christ, lifelong environmentalist and organizer and activist to stop climate change.
“Ash Wednesday 2013 is a good day to be arrested as an advocate for God’s creation.  For Christians, Ash Wednesday is a day of conscience and conviction, when we take stock of our lives and our life-together on the planet, and we confess our self-indulgent appetites, our intemperate love of worldly goods and comforts, and our obsession with consumption of every kind.   On Ash Wednesday, we acknowledge that we are accountable to the God who gave us life and who entrusted the earth to our care.  Ash Wednesday — a good day to be arrested – a good day to realign our lives with God’s desire to preserve this good creation.”
Reverend Lennox Yearwood – President of the Hip Hop Caucus, and leader in the anti-war, environmental and social justice movements.
“This is a courageous moment for our movement, which in turn demands courage from for our President. I believe President Obama is a courageous leader who will make the right decision by rejecting the permit for the Keystone XL pipeline project, and when he does, the people who elected him for a second term – the young, the old, the working class, the middle class, the beautiful Black, Brown, Asian, White, and American Indian people of this country – will have his back.”
Rick Bass – a former petroleum geologist and wildlife biologist, is the author of 30 books of fiction and nonfiction, including, most recently, In My Home There is No More Sorrow: Ten Days in Rwanda, and A Thousand Deer

Steve Kretzmann – Founder and Executive Director, Oil Change International
“I’m risking arrest because stopping the pipeline is not simply a policy choice – it is a moral choice.  What our generation and this Administration does now will impact the lives of billions who are threatened today and for many tomorrows by climate change.  Business as usual is not an option – we must act with all the strength that nonviolent action can create.”
Susan Luebbe – Nebraska rancher, currently in litigation with the State of Nebraska to defend the state’s waterways and resources from reckless pipeline development
“As a 3rd generation cowgirl from the Sand Hills of Nebraska I have worked hard with others to get KXL off our ranch. I want to take this risk of arrest with many other landowners, and indigenous tribal members from Canada through the United States to end this fight. I want to make an impact in this fight for residents of Canada’s tar sands region to Eleanor Fairchild’s Texas property. TransCanada’s project cuts right through the heart of environmentally sensitive land and cultural history. I want the future generation to see what it takes to fight for something so precious that our ancestors worked so hard to build for all of us.”

Maria Gunnoe – Boone Co WV Organizer with OVEC – Organized Voices Empowering Communities. 2009 Goldman Prize winner, 2012 Wallenberg Medal recipient.
“President Obama must end mountaintop removal coal mining. Coal kills from the cradle to the grave. It’s a climate catastrophe and a personal one. We in Appalachia know first hand what it means when the coal industry moves in and takes over your community. Energy companies and government agencies root and pollute the land, air and water that sustains all our lives with energy as their excuse. This simply is NOT an acceptable plan for our children’s future. We deserve a healthy energy plan. One that ENDs mountaintop removal coal mining and its deadly impacts on Appalachian people. No one should have to die for electricity in America.”

North Providence Is Energized By Solar Project


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Mayor Charles Lombardi, left, discusses the merits of the solar landfill project with Town Council President Kristen Catanzaro, center, and member Alice Brady. (Tim Faulkner/ecoRI News)

NORTH PROVIDENCE — Local solar energy got a boost Tuesday night from the Town Council.

At the urging of Mayor Charles Lombardi, the council voted unanimously to move ahead with a plan to consider dropping property taxes for the development of a solar array at the town’s old landfill.

Lombardi has implored the council for several months to move forward with the project, to take advantage of a state renewable energy incentive program — a program that would deliver reliable revenue to the town. Six solar developers responded to an initial inquiry to develop a 3-megawatt array on the 15-acres site.

Lombardi said the town would receive an annual fee from the owner of the solar array in lieu of taxes. Other proposed uses for the site, he said, such as a playground and wind turbines weren’t viable due to noise and gas leaking from the former Superfund site.

“We’re trying to get additional revenue from a barren piece of property,” the mayor said.

A solar project, Lombardi added, would allow the town to participate in Rhode Island’s popular distributed generation program. The four-year trial program is designed to boost local renewable energy projects by offering incentives such as fixed pricing for electricity generated from wind, solar and hydroelectric projects.

Two residents spoke at the Jan. 8 meeting. Joseph Muschiano was skeptical of a project that had yet to receive a formal bid from a developer. “You’re just asking us to throw away 20 years of taxes and letting this guy come in,” he said.

James Grande liked that the project was quiet, unlike the dirt bikes and four-wheelers that frequent the area. “You want something that’s not going to create any noise versus creating noise,” he said.

Of the six initial proposals, the town has taken an interest in a submission from Belmont, Calif.-based SunEdison. All of the developers sought tax relief before moving forward with the project, Lomabrdi said. The Town Council must approve the tax deal. Tuesday’s vote by the council requests the town’s ordinance committee to move forward with the mayor’s request to grant the tax break.

Richard Fossa, Lombardi’s chief of staff, said the land isn’t suited for businesses or recreation. “You are not going to get any restaurant or people on the grass. Nobody wants to go there,” Fossa said.

Lombardi noted that the site currently has no access to public water, sewage or electricity.

The state Department of Environmental Management (DEM) classified the site as suitable for a solar project, according to Fossa. If built, the town would be responsible for cutting the grass at the site and monitoring environmental conditions at the former landfill. The owner of the project would pay the cost of building a fence around the site. DEM allows new construction to disturb 30 inches of the landfill topsoil, or cap. But Fossa said the solar project wouldn’t require digging and instead be secured by weights.

Chris Kearns of the state Office of Energy Resources presented an overview of the state’s distributed generation contract law, which the General Assembly passed in 2011. The program reserves an allotment of generated electricity each year to be used for renewable projects. The electricity is typically more expensive than standard fossil-fuel-based power. The cost for the green energy is subsidized by National Grid ratepayers.

Renewable energy, Kearns said, is needed to diversify Rhode Island’s power generation supply. Currently, about 98 percent of the state’s electricity is produced by natural gas. The proposed project also would help the state reach its goal of 16 percent renewable power generation by 2019.

So far, 15 solar projects and one wind turbine have been approved under the distributed generation program. Of the municipally backed projects, East Providence received a contract for a 3.7-megawatt solar landfill project. Westerly is considering a similar solar array on town land. Kearns said Bristol and Glocester are seeking permits for large solar energy systems.

The 70-acre site in North Providence was an active regional landfill from 1967-83. It was declared a Superfund site in 1989 and capped in 2007.

“I think this the best idea for the neighborhood,” Council member Stephen Feola said. “This isn’t going to generate any traffic. It’s a win-win. It’s a no-brainer.”

By TIM FAULKNER/ecoRI News

ecoRI News is a Providence-based nonprofit journalistic initiative devoted to educating readers about the causes, consequences and solutions to local environmental issues and problems.

Johnson and Wales to Host Compost Conference


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The Environment Council of Rhode Island, in conjunction with many partners in the Compost Industry, will present the 2013 Rhode Island Compost Conference and Trade Show. It’s on Friday February 8, 2013  beginning at 8:30 AM at the Johnson and Wales University Harborside Recreation Center, 305 Shipyard St in Providence.

This year there is both a new location, Johnson & Wales University graciously agreed to host the conference,  and a new format including a variety of panels focused on developing the compost industry and practice in Rhode Island.

The keynote speaker will be Gretel Clark, the spark behind the successful Hamilton MA compost collection program, which has spread from a pilot to a full community program.  She will have much to offer us.

Other featured speakers include Mike Merner of Earthcare Farm, Ken Ayars, chief of the RI Division of Agriculture, Matt Genuso of Chez Pascal discussing how to collect compostables at a restaurant, state representative Art Handy, chair of the House Environment Committee, Dr. Robert Rafka of the URI Master Composters speaking on compost science, Paul Frade of PF Trading discusiing the ahauling of commercial food scrap for composting, and vendors for Big Hanna and Biogreen 360,  in vessel aerobic systems for institutions.   We will see more sectors of the industry than at previous conferences and more for home composters than ever.

The trade show will include a number of compost oriented businesses highlighting new trends in the industry and products individuals and businesses can use to help them manage their food scrap.

Registration  is available at   http://www.environmentcouncilri.org/content/compost-conference-registration. For information Environment Council of Rhode island  401-621-8048

Trade show participants include:

  • Buxton Hollow Farm
  • Earthcare Farm
  • ecoRI News
  • Focused Sustainability Consulting Group, LLC
  • Full Circle Recycling
  • Johnson & Wales University
  • Newport Biodiesel
  • RI Resource Recovery Corporation
  • Southside Community Land Trust
  • URI Master Composters
  • Vegware
  • Waste Management

RI Compost Conference and Trade Show  Friday February 8, 2013  

Johnson & Wales University Harborside Recreation Center 

SCHEDULE

8:30 AM  Registration begins and trade show opens.

9  AM      Welcome    Greetings From hosts, conveners, and dignitaries

9:25 AM   Charge for the day

9:35  AM       Keynote  Gretel Clark     Hamilton MA compost program

10:15 AM  announcements

10:20 AM  head to workshops

First session of panels  10:30  to 11;25

Solutions for restaurants   Matt Genusio  Chez Pascal   Paul Frade PF Trading

Home composting   Nancy Warner  Worm Ladies of Charlestown     Reinhard Sidor URI Master Composters

Compost science  Dr. Robert Rafka  URI  Master Composters

The environment in RI for advances in composting    Frank Jacques  Buxton Hollow Farm     Greg Gerritt  RI Compost Initiative

Second session   11:35 to 12:30

Solutions for institutions  Scott Miller   JWU    Jim Murphy   RIC     David Temple Vegware

The state of compost on Smith Hill  Rep. Art Handy

In vessel aerobic composting   John Clifford  Big Hanna     Bill Hanley Biogreen 360

Compost, soil, and food in Rhode Island   Mike Merner  Earthcare Farm    Ken Ayars   RIDEM

Lunch and Trade Show at 12:30  in the exhibition hall

2 PM  panel   what next    Panelists    Michael O’Connell  RIRRC   RIEDC invited

3 PM  next steps  closing  

3:15 PM  Trade show 

2013 RI Compost Conference and Trade Show


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Preparations for the 2013 Rhode Island Compost Conference and Trade Show organized by the Environment Council of Rhode Island Compost Initiative are moving along nicely.

Several sponsors, including ecoRI, Full Circle Recycling, Shapiro Enterprises, and Waste Management have already signed on to support the event.  In addition to the sponsors there are commitments for exhibits from Big Hanna, Earth Appliance, Vegware,RI Resource RecoveryCorporation, EarthCare Farm, Ecoassets, and the URI Master Composters Program.

The speakers program is going to be very interesting with Gretel Clark, who developed the Hamilton Massachusetts compost collection program, keynoting.
This year there will be a number of workshops on compost related topics including home composting, what restaurants and institutions can do, the science of compost, and how to move the industry forward in Rhode Island.  Speakers lined up include Ken Ayars of RIDEM, Mike Merner of Earthcare Farm, Nancy Warner of the Worm Ladies of Charlestown, Paul Frade of PFTrading company, Scott Miller talking about innovations in compost at Johnson & Wales University, Dr Robert Rafka discussing the science of compost,  Reinhard Sidor of the URI Master Composters program, a speaker from Rhode Island Resource Recovery Corporation, and Representative Art Handy on the state of compost on Smith Hill.  Some of the panels are not fully populated, and if you have appropriate expertise and would like to speak for 15 minutes as part of a 3 person panel, please get in touch with Greg Gerritt.
Sponsorship and exhibition hall opportunities are also still available.   Packets on sponsorship and exhibiting can be obtained by emailing Greg Gerritt at  environmentcouncil@earthlink.net  or calling 401-331-0529.

Registration is available on line at http://www.environmentcouncilri.org/content/compost-conference-registration

The conference fee is $25.00 per person, but lunch alone at a place with the culinary reputation of Johnson & Wales ought to be worth the price.  Come join us on February 8 in Providence.
Tentative Agenda
RI Compost Conference and Trade Show  Friday February 8, 2013  Johnson & Wales University Harborside Recreation Center. 

8:30 AM  Registration begins and trade show opens.

9  AM      Welcome    Greetings From hosts, conveners, and dignitaries

9:25 AM   Charge for the day

9:35  AM       Keynote  Gretel Clark     Hamilton MA compost program


10:15 AM  announcements

 

10:20 AM  head to workshops


First session of panels  10:30  to 11;25

Solutions for restaurants   Matt Genusio  Chez Pascal   Paul Frade PF Trading

Home composting   Nancy Warner  Worm Ladies of Charlestown     Reinhard Sidor URI Master Composter

Compost science  Dr. Robert Rafka

The environment in RI for advances in composting  Frank Jacques  Buxton Hollow Farm     Greg Gerritt  RI Compost Initiative

 

 

Second session   11:35 to 12:30

Solutions for institutions  Scott Miller   JWU  , Jim Murphy   RIC     David Temple Vegware

The state of compost on Smith Hill  Rep. Art Handy (invited)

In vessel aerobic composting   John Clifford     Big Hanna

Compost, soil, and food in Rhode Island   Mike Merner  Earthcare Farm    Ken Ayars   RIDEM

 

Lunch and Trade Show at 12:30  in the exhibition hall

           

2 PM  panel   what next    Panelists from  RIRRC,  RIDEM, Massrecycle.

3 PM  next steps    

3:15 PM  Trade show 

 

What’s at Stake Nov. 6: The General Assembly, RIPTA

It’s time to take a look as some of our General Assembly candidates. Rhode Island’s universal support for the environment keeps it out of the ProJo and off the 11 o’clock news during campaign season. That doesn’t mean the voters should forget our November 6th choices will chart Rhode Island’s path for the next two years.

Lately, the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority has been a political hot potato. One freshman legislator, however, comes to mind as having the spine to fight for the fiscal health of RIPTA despite the risk—Representative Jay O’Grady (HD 46 Lincoln, Cumberland) sponsored legislation in both 2011 and 2012 to get RIPTA off of its failing gas-tax funding and create a more sustainable source of funds for public transit in our state.

Rep. O’Grady is one of the many that know that a reliable, extensive transit system is a win-win-win.  Keeping cars off the road and carbon out of the atmosphere is a key step for the environment.  It is also a key piece of our economy.  Businesses like to go where their workers like to live, and reliable, accessible, affordable transit service is high on the list of things skilled workers want in their communities.  At a much more basic level, transit availability makes it possible for lower income people to have jobs at all. Most Rhode Islanders live within a quarter-mile of a RIPTA stop, and it is sure a lot cheaper than $4/gallon fuel.
Rhode Islanders understand that the metaphorical “business climate” is supported by protecting the literal, actual climate.  And it is becoming increasingly difficult for climate change deniers in this state to make their case.  Never mind what the IPCC says or the latest scientific models—here in the Ocean State we can directly see the impacts of climate change in a very real and tangible way—particularly when it comes to sea level rise.
The residents of State House District 36 probably know this better than most, stretching across much of RI’s southern coast.  Donna Walsh has served her constituents well since 2007.  As vice chair of the House Committee on Environment and Natural Resources, she sets the standard for pro-environment legislators. While representing “the land of small business,” she continues to connect the environment and our economic strength.

The slate of candidates endorsed by Clean Water Action this election are, as always, smart legislators who understand how to act at the nexus of environmental, public health, economic and social policy—whether it’s Representative Handy working to protect children from lead poisoning; Representative Tomasso pushing for renewable energy projects in Coventry; or Representative Tanzi fighting for transportation choices in South County.  These candidates understand that protecting the environment isn’t at odds with or secondary to economic development. It is instead the foundation of it.

Check out our full slate of endorsed candidates here.

 

What’s at Stake Nov. 6: Our Shared Federal Lands


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

One of Clean Water Action’s core missions is to make democracy work. The cornerstone of this strategic focus is to hold our elected officials accountable to voters. A crucial problem underlying many pollution problems, we believe, is an imbalance of political power that distorts our political system and hampers good policy.

The protection of the environment, investment in the renewable energy economy and reduction in power of special interest takes strength in numbers. This holds true in Congress as well. For that reason, candidates must be judged in context of who they will call friends. Our Congress has few green-blooded environmentalists left.

First District, First:

Mr. Doherty:

 [The Infrastructure Jobs and Energy Independence Act] dedicates revenues from new energy exploration to slash our deficit, build clean-coal plants, clean up our air and water, increase our use of renewable energy, and rebuild our crumbling highways and bridges.

Not so bad. Though “clean-coal” is a fairy tale. There is as much clean coal in our nation as there are glaciers inFlorida. Even President Obama, endorsed by by CWA, Sierra Club and Environment America, has swallowed this pill in order to win Ohio.

 Mr. Cicilline, your rebuttal:

 …with gas close to $4 a gallon, it is time to end our addiction to foreign energy. David has been working hard to rein in excessive Wall Street oil speculation, which many experts agree is part of the rising price consumers are paying at the pump. David is also focused on the long-term energy independence of our nation. The only way to get gas prices down in the long run, while also helping improve our environment, is to support the development of renewable energy and advanced vehicle technologies.

It isn’t hard to be an environmentalist in Rhode Island. It is a single fishing trip off Point Judith, kayak tour of Narrow River, spring hike in Lincoln Woods or daring leap off the cliffs at Beavertail. Every Rhode Islander connects quality of life with the environment. Every Rhode Island Congressman goes to Washington. Folks in that town brought us the Safe Drinking Water Act and then exempted hydraulic fracturing chemicals from its oversight.

Doherty will claim to reach across the aisle if elected. Scott Brown said that too. A New England Republican might do so in support of environmental protections, see John Chafee and Mitt Romney v. 1.0.  Sen. Brown’s F on the most recent environmental report card indicates otherwise. This Congress took 297 votes to weaken public health and environmental protections. On which side of that aisle will Doherty sit? I think we can keep our support with Cicilline, he’s already spent two years supporting the environment.

Instead of canned website statements, let’s look at the 2nd District’s first debate. The environment was finally addressed with this interesting question (start at 51:00). Arlene Violet asks:

 Mr. Riley, on your website you say entitlements should be paid for by ‘revenue ideas’ not taxes to shore up the safety net. Specifically, what ‘revenue ideas’ or projects would you implement.

To which Riley responds:

 The revenue ideas I identified in the Riley plan have to do with the huge amount of federal lands that we own. As citizens we have assets, and we have liabilities. That is how you would look at the balance sheet of America…you and I, and everyone in this room, has a share in the land. Under these lands are a vast quantity of gas, oil, whatever, rare minerals, rare earth minerals, those kinds of things, which are laying fallow. We’re not using them. We’re not selling them. We’re not lending out royalty rights. Not doing leasing rights. That revenue is not coming in. That should be coming in to help pay down those areas like entitlements where we have underfunded them. Why do we always assume that we gotta to go and tax the richest guy we see? Why don’t we actually utilize our balance sheet and bring dollars in for everyone and pay down the problems?

I had to pick my jaw up off the floor. Langevin, after the question is changed to coal and fracturing, returns:

 I don’t believe there is such a thing as clean coal. Coal is a dirty fossil fuel and we have to get ourselves off our dependence on fossil fuels in general. In the short run I think we should explore and use utilize all of our energy resources… The real future of controlling our energy costs is developing alternative energy sources, whether it’s winds, solar or biofuels, and by the way, that’s a real jobs opportunity for Rhode Island. We could be the first state in the country to have a first, functioning wind farm off our coast. Those wind turbines would be built in Quonset-Davisville, in my district… If we are the first, we’ll be a hub for building these up and down the east coast and that’s real jobs for Rhode Island.

Langevin gives the best answer of the night. Clean coal is a myth! Build wind turbines at Quonset Point. Let’s get Block Island off diesel generators. Sounds better than leasing the Everglades.

 

 

What’s at Stake Nov. 6th: Remember Climate Change


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Today through Frday I’m going to put up a couple of posts about how our environment is going to be impacted by what happens on November 6th. With all the talk about jobs and the economy, I am continually surprised that so few are connecting these topics to the invaluable strides our nation has made in protecting our rivers, drinking water, air, oceans, parks, mountains and beaches over the last half century.

The economy is more than unemployment numbers, GDP and stock prices; it is a measure of our quality of life and participation in society. Let’s start looking at some of the issues that will have a profound impact on our economy and way of life in the future.

First, let’s take a quick trip in our “Way-Back” machine. Clean Water Action hard-wired it into all of our office computers a couple years ago. It is a useful tool for providing some context for the campaign rhetoric we are forced to consume every four years.

Here is an excerpt from a May 2008 speech by The Maverick, John McCain:

We stand warned by serious and credible scientists across the world that time is short and the dangers are great. The most relevant question now is whether our own government is equal to the challenge… In the years ahead, we are likely to see reduced water supplies…more forest fires than in previous decades…changes in crop production…more heat waves afflicting our cities and a greater intensity in storms. Each one of these consequences of climate change will require policies to protect our citizens, especially those most vulnerable to violent weather.

What a prediction! Can you imagine a Republican Presidential nominee uttering such words? But would he propose a solution to such a national issue?

 To lead in this effort, however, our government must strike at the source of the problem… We know that greenhouse gasses are heavily implicated as a cause of climate change. And we know that among all greenhouse gasses, the worst by far is the carbon-dioxide that results from fossil-fuel combustion… We will cap emissions according to specific goals, measuring progress by reference to past carbon emissions. By the year 2012, we will seek a return to 2005 levels of emission…by 2020, a return to 1990 levels…and so on until we have achieved at least a reduction of sixty percent below 1990 levels by the year 2050… And in pursuit of these objectives, we cannot afford to take economic growth and job creation for granted. A strong and growing economy is essential to all of our goals, and especially the goal of finding alternatives to carbon-based technology. We want to turn the American economy toward cleaner and safer energy sources

Doth my eyes deceive? Was that a plan to address carbon emissions? How would a Democrat respond to such specifics? An upstart Senator from Illinois said this:

And in the long-term, few regions [speech was in Miami] are more imperiled by the stronger storms, higher floodwaters, and devastating droughts that could come with global warming. Whole crops could disappear, putting the food supply at risk for hundreds of millions. While we share this risk, we also share the resources to do something about it. That’s why I’ll bring together the countries of the region in a new Energy Partnership for the Americas. We need to go beyond bilateral agreements. We need a regional approach. Together, we can forge a path toward sustainable growth and clean energy. Leadership must begin at home. That’s why I’ve proposed a cap and trade system to limit our carbon emissions and to invest in alternative sources of energy. We’ll allow industrial emitters to offset a portion of this cost by investing in low carbon energy projects in Latin America and the Caribbean. And we’ll increase research and development across the Americas in clean coal technology, in the next generation of sustainable biofuels not taken from food crops, and in wind and solar energy.

Perhaps I am complicit in my own deception. It appears that our two major Presidential candidates, only four years ago, ran on a shared a platform to address climate change. The halcyon days of 2008.

 

Despite my dismay that President Obama has maintained radio silence on how he will reinvigorate the debate around a cap-and-trade system and reducing carbon emissions, the President has taken action to warrant a reelection endorsement by the environmental community. A short comparison of President Obama and Governor Romney provides the following:

The President is only one piece of the puzzle. We need a U.S. Senate that is willing to take action. Addressing climate change is not just about wind turbines and solar power; it is about protecting American people and society. Weather patterns are continually more hostile for a much of American and global temperatures continue a steep rise, threatening our ocean and marine habitats. It is for a new path.

Take a minute (or 38 of them) and listen to Senator Whitehouse. I would not have said it better myself. Let us pull out a couple key points made by the Honorable Senator from Rhode Island:

Human actions have resulted in warming and acidification of the oceans and are now causing increasing hypoxia. Acidification is obvious — the ocean is becoming more acid; hypoxia means low oxygen levels. Studies of the Earth’s past indicate that these are the three symptoms . . . associated with each of the previous five mass extinctions on Earth.

When polluters were required to phase out the chemicals they were emitting that were literally burning a hole through our Earth’s atmosphere[remember CFC’s?], they warned that it would create “severe economic and social disruption” due to “shutdowns of refrigeration equipment in supermarkets, office buildings, hotels, and hospitals.” Well, in fact, the phaseout happened 4 years to 6 years faster than predicted; it cost 30 percent less than predicted; and the American refrigeration industry innovated and created new export markets for its environmentally friendly products. Anyway, the real point is we are not just in this Chamber to represent the polluters. We are supposed to be here to represent all Americans, and Americans benefit from environmental regulation big time.

A quick peak at the issues page on Hickley’s website shows specific support for increased use of fossil fuels and opposition to the, at one time, bi-partisan proposal for a cap-and-trade program that would provide the necessary economic incentives to reduce carbon emissions. We need a new path.

Of course,the Whitehouse – Hinckley race does not exist in a vacuum. If the United States is to take action on climate change there is one person who CANNOT control the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee: James M. Inhofe. Despite the 97% of all scientist which agree that climate change is happening because of human activity, Inhofe prefers to believe in a worldwide conspiracy.

Our choice in Rhode Island (and Massachusetts, Go Warren!) will impact our next steps. I do not want to support a single party in Congress, because the environment used to be a non-partisan issue, see Teddy Roosevelt and John Chafee. When the national Republican Party, however, stopped protection of open spaces, stopped preservation of the wetlands that buffer our coasts, and exempted  for hydraulic-fracking companies from disclosing what they are pumping into our groundwater, I figured it was time to take sides.

Oh, how I wish to return to the days when adults could talk about climate change without being accused of killing jobs. This is a short-sighted and narrow lens through which to view our economy. Developing a sustainable and beneficial economy for all of America requires attention to the elephant in the room: global warming. That’s right, I said it, global warming. Ever see the phrase “Rhode Island: 3% bigger at low tide”? Imagine sea level rise continuing at its current pace. “Rhode Island: 3% smaller every century

Stay tuned for tomorrow’s installment of “What’s at Stake on November 6th” where I will review some of the environmental issues facing the U.S House of Representatives in the next two years.

Clean Water Action Endorses Candidates


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
State House Dome from North Main Street
State House Dome from North Main Street
The State House dome from North Main Street. (Photo by Bob Plain)

With September 11th just around the corner, it is time for RI Primary voters to make up their mind. I’m sure you have been sitting up half the night wondering which candidate has the strongest voice for our environment. Look no further.

Clean Water Action is proud to announce that, after vetting the candidates who seek the green stamp of approval, we have a list of those that we believe to be valuable allies. Whether your concerns are about sustainable funding for public transportation, keeping the ban on incineration in place, preserving and extending the life of our landfill, investing in water infrastructure or, more simply, protecting the beauty of Narragansett Bay and our endless coastline, consider these candidates when going to the poll next week.

For next Tuesday’s Statewide Primary, Clean Water Action has endorsed the following candidates:

– David Cicilline (D) – 1st Congressional District

– Chris Blazejewski (D) – House District 2 (Providence)

– Libby Kimzey (D) – House District 8 (Providence)

– Joe Almeida (D) – House District 12 (Providence)

– Art Handy (D) – House District 18 (Cranston)

– Jay O’Grady (D) – House District 46 (Lincoln and Pawtucket)

– Stephen Casey (D) – House District 50 (Woonsocket)

– Gus Uht (D) – House District 52 (Cumberland)

– Gayle Goldin (D) – Senate District 3 (Providence)

– Adam Satchell (D) – Senate District 9 (West Warwick)

– Bob DaSilva (D) – Senate District 14 (East Providence)

– Lewis Pryeor (D) – Senate District 24 (Woonsocketand and North Smithfield)

– Gene Dyzlewski (D) – Senate District 26 (Cranston)

– Laura Pisaturo (D) – Senate District 29 (Warwick)

Clean Water is contacting its members in these districts by going door-to-door, making phone calls, and mailing letters to urge them to vote for environmental candidates. Another round of endorsements will be made for the General Election.

Sewage Treatment Gets Legislative Treatment


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
State House Dome from North Main Street
State House Dome from North Main Street
The State House dome from North Main Street. (Photo by Bob Plain)

In the waning days of the legislative session, can one be forgiven for suspecting that Assembly members don’t give a, well how about a quart of  sewage solids about the municipal governments they represent?  Sewage stories from Woonsocket and Warwick lead one to suspect otherwise.

Woonsocket first. Woonsocket is currently under a DEM order to drive nutrient pollution down beginning in 2013. Nutrient pollution, in the form of nitrates and ammonia, acts as fertilizer for algae blooms that use up oxygen in the water, killing the fish that aren’t driven away. The estimated cost of these improvements is around $35 million.  The system serves Woonsocket, but also some customers in neighboring towns, on either side of the border with Massachusetts.  The estimate is that this will add a couple of hundred dollars to annual sewer bills.

Woonsocket’s now-infamous House delegation, Jon Brien, Robert Phillips, and Lisa Baldelli-Hunt, tried to get the DEM requirement killed during the last legislative session. Unfortunately, DEM is only enforcing a federal EPA requirement, so it’s more complicated than just yelling, “stop.”

Complicating the issue, upstream from Woonsocket, the sewage authority over the line in Massachusetts is suing the EPA over the same rules. The dodge currently preferred by the city of Woonsocket and their House delegation is that Rhode Island wait for the outcome of that suit. Though it might seem to make sense to wait for the suit to settle, similar suits around the country have failed. Besides, clean water is — to most people — a good thing. Might the delegation have proposed helping Woonsocket pay for the sewage treatment upgrades?

Move now to Warwick. The Assembly repealed a law to mandate that homeowners along the new sewer routes hook their houses up to those sewers.  A typical hookup costs $1500-2000, and annual sewer bills are around $450. The mandate is/was part of the Greenwich Bay Special Area Management Plan, a plan to clean Greenwich Bay, once home to a thriving shellfish fishery, and now mostly closed to digging clams.

Governor Chafee vetoed the bill and the Assembly overrode his veto. Another victory for low sewer bills. Except that the finances of the Warwick Sewer Authority have budgeted in a certain number of hookups per year. This is part of how they borrowed the money to fund the expansion in the first place, and how they make their budget each year. Without those new hookups, the people already connected to the sewer will see their rates rise, both according to the financial statements, and to Janine Burke, the Warwick Sewer Authority director, who I spoke to about it.

Alternatively, the Authority has the legal authorization to charge a fee — a “connect-capable” fee of around $200 per year — to the houses along its route that aren’t hooked up. To date it has chosen not to do so (which puts it out of compliance with the Greenwich Bay plan), but it can revisit the issue. At any rate, overriding that veto in order to keep sewer costs down seems like it may be a losing strategy.

What both of these stories say is that the state is interested in seeing cleaner water. The Assembly gave no orders that DEM repudiate the EPA requirements. No one will go on record wanting dirty water and dead fish. They just don’t want to pay for the cleanup.

To a small extent, you have to give the Woonsocket gang of three a little credit for consistency. They don’t think cleaner water is worth spending any money on, and so reject both the money and the requirements, even if they offer lip service to clean water. Lisa Baldelli-Hunt told the Woonsocket Patch:

“I understand it’s important to decrease the pollutants in the water and I also understand that eventually, this must happen. But we can’t possibly move forward with this project at this time and consider ourselves fiscally responsible leaders.”

So their position is clean water, later. The rest of the Assembly seems ok with the idea of clean water now, so long as someone else pays for it. Neither perspective seems worth endorsing to me.

What about the perspective that clean water now is a good thing worth paying for?  It’s a good thing for Woonsocket, but it’s also a good thing for everyone downstream, which means Lincoln, Cumberland, Pawtucket, Central Falls, Providence, and everyone on Narragansett Bay. Untreated sewage currently flows into the water from the Warwick shore, but East Greenwich benefits from a cleaner Greenwich Bay, too. Given all that, why should the state insist that all sewage problems be solved locally?  Yes, Woonsocket residents pay higher property taxes proportional to their ability than nearly any other city or town in the state.  Sewer customers in Providence and Pawtucket have seen their rates climb dramatically in recent years for the same reasons.  Does the state have nothing to offer besides words? How about money?

Let’s end with a riddle. In 2010, our state’s economy, measured by the gross state product, was about $49.2 billion dollars. Corrected for inflation, this is larger than it has ever been in our little state’s history, despite our monumental unemployment rate. There are those who say that our economic growth is because of the dramatic drop in tax revenue over the past decades. That’s silly because growth has slowed or stalled as taxes have been cut. But slow growth or fast, the economy now is bigger than ever.

So remember, when you hear about how we can no longer afford clean water or good education or comfortable retirements — let alone find enough jobs for everyone — that our state is collectively richer now than it has ever been before. Ever. Feel better now?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387