Sheldon Whitehouse talks climate change denial Friday at URI


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

aaup-flyerOne side of the debate concerning climate change denial has been represented recently in Wall Street Journal and Providence Journal editorials, with both conservative op/ed boards taking Senator Sheldon Whitehouse to task for suggesting Big Oil should be held liable for lying about climate change.

“Under Presidents Clinton and Bush the Department of Justice brought and won civil lawsuits against the tobacco industry for its coordinated, fraudulent campaign to sow doubt about the potential harms of its product,” Whitehouse told RI Future. “I have asked whether similar inquiries should be made into the climate denial scheme that is steadily being revealed.”

The URI professors’ union (AAUP) is holding an Earth Day round table discussion on Friday to continue revealing the facts, and delve into the opinions. The event is called “Climate Change Science in an Age of Misinformation.”

Whitehouse will be there, as will former New York Times science editor Cornelia Dean, Kenneth Kimmell, the president of the Union of Concerned Scientists, J. Timmonds Roberts, a Brown University professor of environmental studies and Lee McIntyre, a philosophy fellow at Boston University. The public is invited to attend.

But what is climate change denial? The Wall Street Journal and Providence Journal pieces make it seem like Whitehouse wants to punish people for simply disagreeing with his position on climate change. Hardly, said Erik Loomis, a URI history professor who helped organize the event.

“It’s corporate funded pseudo-scientific research that is intended to sow doubt in people’s minds about climate change so that the entrenched interests can continue to profit off of the current energy regime,” he said. “It’s disappointing but not surprising that newspapers owned by media conglomerates are defending this.”

Whitehouse also offered his perspective on why such newspapers are defending climate change denial.

“This drives the fossil fuel front groups crazy,” he said about holding Big Oil accountable in the same way Big Tobacco was held accountable. “So the Wall Street Journal and others are trying to saddle me with an argument I’m not making – because they don’t have a good response to the one I am making. It’s tough to convince people that the fossil fuel industry should be too big to sue, or that it deserves different rules than any other industry under the law, so instead the Journal repeatedly and falsely has accused me of seeking to punish anyone who rejects the scientific evidence of climate change.  That is disproved by the tobacco case itself, which is one reason they don’t much like talking about it.”

Whitehouse will speaking at lunchtime. Dean and Kimmell are leading a panel in the morning. Peter Nightingale, who was once arrested in Whitehouse’s office protesting the senator’s lack of action against a proposed methane power plant in Burrillville is speaking in the afternoon about climate change activism and environmental justice. Bill McKibben is leading off the day-long event with a video recorded specifically for URI.

Talking beer, beauty, and murdered protestors with ‘Out of Sight’ author Erik Loomis


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Erik Loomis is a Rhode Island treasure.

Loomis book coverThis much is clear from his Twitter feed, his prodigious blogging, and – based on excerpts in truthout and In These Times – his latest book, Out of Sight: Long and Disturbing Story of Corporations Outsourcing Catastrophe.

If you aren’t familiar with Erik – Rhody’s own fire-spitting, NRA-fighting, grave-visiting, environmental/labor history guru – you’ll want to head down to AS220 on Wednesday night (November 18) at 5:30 p.m. to hear about how “our systems of industrial production today are just as dirty and abusive as they were during the depths of the industrial revolution and the Gilded Age, but…hidden in faraway places where workers are most vulnerable” (a quote from the book’s promo copy).

In advance of the event, I spoke with him about a variety of topics via email. (And, no, RI Future’s previous three interviews – here, here, and here – had not answered all of my questions.)

SCALE OF 1 TO 10, HOW UPSETTING IS THIS BOOK TO READ?

Hmmm….depends on how much you already know about these things. I’m going to guess a 9 for most people.

We mostly have some sense of the problems with the economy–we don’t have steady work, we don’t make enough money, we know the 1% is gaining more control over us. In Rhode Island, we know the jobs have disappeared and that long-term unemployment and urban decline is a big issue. So that’s expected. What people might find more upsetting is the horrors corporations create in the rest of the world in order that they can profit.

At times the book is pretty rough–child labor, pollution, workplace deaths, oil companies having protesters murdered, and climate change are some of the topics I talk about. And I think that readers will be pretty angry at finding out why corporations have moved the jobs abroad and all the different ways it affects our society today. So many of our problems stem, at least in part, to corporations being able to move jobs around the globe. It leads to the decline of unions, which takes working voices out of politics and creates a vacuum filled by wealthy plutocrats like the Koch Brothers. It turns workers and environmentalists against one another when in fact they share a common corporate enemy. It makes it harder to fight climate change. It kills workers overseas while making it harder to fight for a dignified life at home. But I also try to point at concrete ways forward where we can fight to make positive change.

So you should be pretty mad after reading this book. But you should also feel empowered to create changes instead of hopeless despair.

WHAT WAS ONE “HOLY SHIT!” DISCOVERY YOU MADE WHILE RESEARCHING THE BOOK?

I’ve been writing about this stuff for years so I wasn’t too shocked about most of it. But I think one thing that is surprising to me and will be surprising for most people is how many times the government has made attempts to regulate production and working conditions that can be useful for us in trying to fix these problems of global labor exploitation and corporate domination over our lives.

We are told that the free market is a force like gravity that can’t be stopped. But that’s absurd. It’s a series of choices made by people and shaped by governments. Government can allow corporations to exploit workers or it can help stop that exploitation. In many cases, including as early as the 1915 Seaman’s Act, which allowed exploited sailors on foreign ships to leave their jobs when they landed in the U.S. if the conditions on the ships were bad, the government has gotten involved, both at home and with foreign workers, to create something that looks more like a race to the top than a race to the bottom. We can get the government to take these steps again.

YOU’RE A GUY WHO’S BEEN INVOLVED IN SOME INTERESTING CAMPUS-FREE-SPEECH CONVERSATIONS. CARE TO WEIGH IN ON WHAT’S BEEN GOING ON AT YALE AND MIZZOU IN THE LAST WEEK OR SO?

I don’t have particularly strong opinions on the worrying so many people are engaging in about whether the protesters are right or are not respecting free speech. I find these conversations uninteresting and those who complain about these things tend not to support protest generally. Sure, the students may be strident. But protesting students are always strident! That’s what they are supposed to do! Reasoned, civil discourse is for older people. We need both. The reality is that there is a lot of racism throughout the nation. That includes on college campuses. That should be fought. Yale does not need buildings named about John C. Calhoun, architect of secession. And the president of Missouri was horrible and tolerated racist actions on campus. He needed to go.

WHAT’S THE GREATEST ALBUM EVER RELEASED?

It’s funny you ask that. I listen to music almost constantly, except when I’m reading. I cannot live without it. Some people can’t write to music. I can. So what is the best album? I don’t know, that’s so hard and depends on the minute. Jazz, classic country, rock and roll, soul, so many genres. Here’s a list of 10 great albums. We’ll say 5 are “classic” albums, before 2000. And 5 are from the last 15 years:

“Classic”

  1. Marvin Gaye, What’s Going On
  2. Miles Davis, In a Silent Way
  3. The Who, Who’s Next
  4. Millie Jackson, Caught Up
  5. Ray Price, Night Life

“Recent”

  1. Drive-By Truckers, Decoration Day
  2. Wussy, Strawberry
  3. Frank Ocean, Channel Orange
  4. James McMurtry, Live in Aught-Three
  5. PJ Harvey, Stories from the City, Stories from the Sea

YOU’RE A NON-NATIVE RHODE ISLANDER. IT’S ALWAYS INTERESTING TO HEAR HOW THIS STATE APPEARS TO, SAY, A WEST-COASTER. WHAT HAVE YOU NOTICED ABOUT THIS PLACE?

I grew up in Oregon. That’s pretty different than Rhode Island. There are some great things about the state–the seafood. Autumn leaves. Summers on the water. The proximity to New York and Boston. Cool old buildings.

There are some weird things about Rhode Island too. The crazy level of corruption in Rhode Island politics. The accents. That no one has been west of Pennsylvania. That Providence sets its water on fire while we Oregonians, um, don’t. And then there’s the winter. What’s the deal with the winter? How do people survive this every year? I think last winter traumatized me permanently. Not to mention the potholes and tire damage it all causes.

Finally, and I don’t want to alienate any readers, but the beer scene in Rhode Island is atrocious. First of all, a great pint of beer in Oregon runs you $5, tops. You can still find $3 happy hours for some of the best beers in the nation. The beer scene has improved here in my 5 years and I’m thankful for that, but we need more brewers, we need better brewers, and we need to find ways to sell this beer for less than $7 a pint. Rant over.

THE WORD “DISTURBING” IS RIGHT THERE IN THE SUB-TITLE OF THE BOOK. WHAT ACTIVITIES, IF ANYTHING, DO YOU HAVE FOR MAKING YOURSELF UN-DISTURBED? DO YOU EVER JUST TRY TO ENJOY THE DAY, LIKE NOAM CHOMSKY?

I laugh a lot at the world. I go outside a lot and enjoy the beauty of the country. I watch Oregon football, which usually makes me feel good if less so this year. You can’t let the bad parts of the world own your life if you can help it. There’s a lot of beauty in the world. Remembering that is important.

Eric Loomis on Bernie vs. Hillary: not as critical as defeating GOP

loomis2Bernie Sanders would only be a slightly more progressive president than Hillary Clinton, said Erik Loomis when I asked him which candidate he was supporting in 2016.

“I don’t think it matters very much,” said the URI history professor who will be discussing his new book Out of Sight next week – Wednesday, Nov. 18 from 5:30 to 7:30 at AS220. Earlier this week, RI Future interviewed Loomis about his book, and the TPP.

“This is out of no love for Hillary Clinton that I’m saying this,” Loomis explained. “My guess is that a Bernie Sanders presidency for progressives is about 10 percent better than a Hillary Clinton presidency because of the limitations and structure of American politics.”

Though he said a Sanders presidency would be more likely to oppose a trade deal like TPP than Clinton, he said the two Democratic candidates will likely be facing the same conservative Congress and courts.

“We have to stop thinking strictly through presidential politics as the answer,” he explained. “We’re never going to elect the right person. That’s not how power works. That’s not how the world changes. It’s not how it’s ever changed. It changes from below. It has to come through from people organizing on the ground.”

He said it was was more important to focus on defeating the Republican Party than which Democrat to nominate. “Where the rubber meets the road in 2015 is defeating the Republican Party who actually wants to literally bring us back to the era of the 1890’s and we don’t want that,” he said.

out_of_sight

Erik Loomis on TPP: the ugly, the bad and the good


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

loomisThe Trans Pacific Partnership knows no party lines. It is supported by Barack Obama and Marco Rubio, it is reviled by Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton has moved from supportive to evasive.

Nationally acclaimed author and URI history professor Erik Loomis’ new book “Out of Sight” deals with the exact issues the TPP would exacerbate – and he is anything but evasive on the topic. There may well be no one in Rhode Island who understands its complexities as thoroughly. We spoke at length about the new so-called trade deal, which he cautioned me not to see as a trade deal.

“The trade aspects of it are overrated,” said Loomis, who will be speaking about the TPP, as well as his new book, at an event at AS220 next week. “What it really is is a corporate rights agreement.”

In his new book, Loomis argues that we need to create international labor and environmental standards so that companies can’t keep moving around the globe to find cheaper places to pollute and people to exploit.

The most controversial aspect of the TPP are the Investor-State Dispute Settlement courts it would further empower. These courts, explains Loomis, allow corporations to sue countries when regulations infringe upon their profits. He says we need to flip this idea on its head and create something like a “worker-state dispute settlement court” and that they provide the “framework” for international regulations.

Below is our full 16 minute talk on the TPP. Tune in tomorrow to find out who Loomis is backing for president and why. Yesterday, we focused on his new book.

out_of_sight

Erik Loomis on his new anti-globalization book ‘Out of Sight’


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

out_of_sightThe so-called middle class was largely created by labor unions and government regulations during a brief 40-year window during the 20th Century, explains popular progressive author and University of Rhode Island history professor Erik Loomis.

“From the beginning of the 1930’s with the successful unionization of the American workforce and the New Deal continuing through the 1970’s,” he explains, “was a period where American workers were getting a bigger slice of the pie, where workers were dying on the job less and less, where workers themselves were demanding safer workplaces and promoting the creation of OSHA and the EPA and other agencies that are going to ensure that Americans lead decent lives…”

Loomis’ latest book is about what happened next.

“And then corporations figured out how to escape this,” he said during a sit down interview at his URI office in Kingston. “And they do this by moving jobs overseas.”

Aptly called Out of Sight, it’s about how big corporations abandoned the American middle class to bring bad working conditions and environmental degradation to third world nations.

loomis“This is an intentional move by corporations,” Loomis says, “in order to get away from union contracts, to get away from environmental regulations, move it overseas. They can recreate the bad old days, undermine the middle class here, increase their profits and force the burden of global production onto the world’s poorest workers.”

He will be discussing his new book at AS220 on Wednesday, November 18 from 5:30 to 7:30. The event is sponsored by RI Future. An evocative author and speaker of national prominence, Loomis is the Rhode Island’s top scholar on globalization. His book was featured on C-SPAN’s Book TV, as well as in Truthout, Counterpunch, In These Times and Dissent, among others. He’s a regular contributor to the Lawyers, Guns and Money blog.

Few understand the Trans Pacific Partnership as well as Erik Loomis and he’ll be discussing and answering questions about it at the event, as well. We discussed this at length in our interview – including a potential upside for workers and progressives. Tune in tomorrow for the second part of the interview in which Loomis discusses the TPP. Wednesday, we talk about who he’s backing for president, and why.

RIF Radio: Is Raimondo a progressive? What do NECAP math failures tell us? Will Lynette Labinger become a judge? Who was Roy Campbell?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Monday Jan 13, 2013
North Kingstown, RI – Good morning, Ocean State. This is Bob Plain, editor and publisher of the RI Future blog podcasting to you from The Hideaway on the banks of the Mattatuxet River behind the Shady Lea Mill in North Kingstown, Rhode Island.

Today is Tuesday, January 14 and our show today is brought to you by Largess Forestry, our first podcast sponsor. Forest preservationists and licensed arborists, no one will care for your trees better than Matt Largess and his crew. If you’ve got a tree or a woodlot in need of some sprucing up, call Matt today for a free consultation at 849-9191.

Rhode Islanders can expect rain and warm weather today, with temperatures getting close to 50 degrees. In other words, it will be easy even for the simple-minded to recognize the planet is warming today. Thanks God, for making it a little harder for the right-wing spin machine to spread lies about the health of our planet…

And speaking of conditions that question our assumptions about the world … General Treasurer Gina Raimondo, it seems, will be running for governor as a progressive. Her campaign logo even looks like RI Future’s!! For royalties, we only request that you pay us a visit here at the Shady Lea Mill and be our guest on the podcast.

mattatuxet river

 

The Right Needs A Head On A Stick; Erik Loomis’ Will Do


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

It’s been a bad end of the year for conservatives. After deluding themselves into thinking they were going to win the presidential election by a landslide, they instead found themselves routed by a president they’d labelled “socialist” and claimed that he “palled around with terrorists.” And then in the wake of a national tragedy which left twenty-eight people dead, among them 20 children and six educators, politicians decided that they were no longer willing to sacrifice the lives of American citizens so that a few people could own assault rifles. Mike Huckabee’s remarks that the removal of Christian worship from public schools was to blame for the Sandy Hook massacre didn’t go over that well.

In the face of these failures, the right wing fell back to the cultural warfare they so successfully waged during the 1980s and 1990s. With Christmastime a few weeks away, it wasn’t hard to resuscitate that narrative. Now, with gun control looking to be increasingly likely, conservatives needed a target. Enter University of Rhode Island professor of labor and environmental history Erik Loomis. A perfect target for the “universities are indoctrinating our children” theme of conservative writing.

Prof. Loomis, known best in left wing circles for his political blog, Lawyers, Guns & Money, tweeted that he wanted Wayne LaPierre’s (CEO of the National Rifle Association) head on a stick and that the NRA should be classified as a terrorist organization (he has since deactivated his twitter account).

In the civilized world, this is what is known as “hyperbole.” In the conservative world, this is calling for Mr. LaPierre’s assassination. Anchor Rising’s Marc Comtois postulated that Prof. Loomis was merely seeking attention. How did Mr. Comtois prevent him from receiving that attention? With a broadside blog post, that was later redistributed and linked to by “traditional” media on their Twitter accounts and websites.

Better people than I have already written in Prof. Loomis’ defense such as Prof. Daniel Nexon at the Duck of Minerva and Prof. Loomis’ colleagues Robert Farley and Scott Lemieux at Lawyers, Guns & Money. The academics who write for Crooked Timber issued a joint statement that went a bit further; they asked readers to contact URI’s Dean Winnie Brownell (winnie@mail.uri.edu), Provost Donald DeHays (ddehayes@uri.edu), and President David Dooley (davedooley@mail.uri.edu) in a polite, civil, and firm manner and tell them to protect free speech.

That’s the right manner of response. The wrong response was URI’s shameful and cowardly statement that played directly into the conservative bullies’ hands, while also elevating what was essentially a story contained to right wing loudmouths and left wing reactions into “real news”.

Let me be clear, the right wing are being bullies here. These are the same people that use hyperbolic language every day. These are the people who claimed that our President assists terrorists and was one himself, that he’s an Islamic Kenyan sleeper agent who hates America, that he’s destroying the nation with his godless socialism, that he’s a fascist fostering a cult of personality so he can end the American Republic forever.

If URI buckles to the demands of these hypocrites it will be a blow against intellectual freedom that will reverberate across the United States; and I do not believe I am being hyperbolic here. No academic’s opinions are safe, regardless of whether they’re left, right, or center. It will prove to the right wing that intimidation works, that no use of hyperbole that the right can portray as offensive anywhere should be protected speech. And tactics that work are often copied. The left will push back in the exact same manner, and then it will be a battle over who can collect more heads.

Universities and colleges need to be centers of academic freedom regardless of political belief, if only because we are all enriched when they can have debates that political discourse is too soundbite-based to have. It’s a near-sighted and hypocritical game the right is playing. And they should be condemned for playing it.

Netroots Asks: ‘What Does A New Economy Look Like?’


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

I stumbled across our editor Bob Plain at Beyond Occupy: What Does a New Economic System Look Like? which took place at 10:30 AM. Bob was unfortunately trying to coordinate with David Pepin on the budget live-blogging, leading to some furtive discussion on his cellphone that eventually attracted a few stares before Bob went outside. The panel discussion itself was somewhat disappointing. I was hoping for an articulated view of a new economic system. It was moderated by Jenifer Fernandez Ancona of the Women Donors Network; and features Sarita Gupta (Executive Director of Jobs With Justice), Simon Johnson (Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Sloan School of Management and former Chief Economist at the International Monetary Fund), Colin Mutchler (CEO and co-founder of LoudSauce), and Erica Payne (Founder and President of the Agenda Project).

As I said, if I was expecting a sort of map of how a new economic system is supposed to look, this was not it. Despite an early statement about this discussion being titled “Beyond Occupy” due to the fact that Occupy changed the nature of discussion but needs to articulate a vision, no such vision came forward. There were some interesting turns of phrase. Mr. Mutchler seemed to have the clearest vision of what an economy should be organized around: happiness. A commenter from the audience seemed to support that, but undercuts their own authority by saying that happiness is in the Constitution; it’s not. Ms. Ancona said that ultimately what happens are two competing views of the economy: that of the right which views it as a natural force and that of the left that views it as a human-created force.

Watch live streaming video from fstvnewswire at livestream.com

Most surprising was the fact that labor was de-emphasized here. At one point, Ms. Ancona turned to Ms. Gupta and said, “I don’t think I imagine a future with labor.” Ms. Gupta was somewhat tepid in her response, saying that the labor movement in America was too concerned with its specific members and hadn’t grown out of a class conscious movement. Which is both right and wrong. But it’s about what you’d expect; the “netroots” is largely non-union, who understand a union in theory but don’t feel the need to associate with the labor movement. It goes to show, “progressive” is a wide-open term.

While ultimately a “new economic system” doesn’t come forth (Erik Loomis of Lawyers, Guns and Money criticized this discussion as “5 people talking about the greatness of slightly reformed capitalism” on his Twitter feed), I think Mr. Mutchler was the most on the ball when he said that we’re living in an era where institutions (like big banks and even democracy) are breaking down; but that below the surface, new innovations are taking place. But there was no real takeaway here.