‘Recommend Rhode Island’


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

peet poemIndiana and Arkansas
Champions of religious law
Determined that the scriptures say
“You won’t be served if you are gay”

Rhode Island has religion too
Our common sense shapes what we do
“You’ll never get served if you’re rude
Or have a lousy attitude”

Indiana and Arkansas
Are family states where Ma or Pa
Want neighbors to be just like them
No handsome women or pretty men

Rhode Island’s more a people state
The mixing is what makes it great
Freedom to live and love and play
No matter what the scriptures say

c2015pn
Read Peet Nourjian’s previous poems here.

Cicilline to sponsor LGBT civil rights bill; would trump state RFRA laws


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

cicillineRhode Island Congressman David Cicilline is drafting a bill with Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon that would extend civil rights protections to LGBT people, he explained in an interview with RI Future.

The bill, long in the works, he said, would prevent states like Indiana from using so-called “religious liberty” laws to sanction discrimination based on sexual orientation.

“Many of us started to feel that the time had come to approach LGBT equality in a different way,” Cicilline said. “Why aren’t we putting together a comprehensive bill that prohibits discrimination against the LGBT community, period? We looked at a variety of federal protections that exist in the civil rights area based on race, and gender, and ethnic origin and religious tradition … why don’t we just add sexual orientation and gender identity to those existing categories that are protected from discrimination.”

Cicilline is co-chair of the LGBT Equality Caucus and, according to a press release, “one of six openly gay Members of the U.S. House of Representatives.” When asked about Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), he said: “The law permits discrimination, which it should not. It should be repealed.”

When I asked Cicilline about Indiana Gov. Mike Pence’s attempt to “clarify” the new law, Cicilline said, “It’s very hard to enact a law that discriminates against people or permits discrimination based on sexual orientation and then try to clarify that away.”

I also asked Cicilline if he’s ever been the victim of discrimination based on his sexual orientation. Listen to the full interview to find out what he said:

Right to Work (for Less)


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Waging war on public sector unionized employees last year, with Governors Walker, Kasich and LePage leading the charge, lawmakers are now gearing up to take on private sector employees in this year’s sessions in legislatures in states across this country. Indiana is in the forefront of the war against workers’ rights with its governor, Daniels, set to introduce legislation into a Republican-led legislature that will make Indiana a “right to work” state. Right to work states have enacted laws that do not require union membership of employees working in union shops, therefore allowing free-riders to enjoy all the benefits of being a member without having to pay dues.

However, with this year’s Super Bowl being played in Indianapolis, a high-profile union in the form of the NFL Players’ Association has issued a statement weighing in on subject.

“Right-to-work is a political ploy designed to destroy basic workers’ rights. It’s not about jobs or rights, and it’s the wrong priority for Indiana.”

The statement also notes that as union members, players aren’t alone; they are joined by employees working the concession stands and everyone else that brings the games to their fans. Making note of teamwork, how right to work laws will decrease the average income of working families in Indiana by approximately $1,500 and urging Indiana legislators to reject the  measure.

Right to work states were predominantly in the South and West but as Republicans have gained control of legislatures and governors’ mansions in traditional “Rust Belt” states, there has been a steady eastward and northward drive to circumvent what was once protected under the National Labor Relations Act. The Wagner Act, as it was first known when passed in 1935, ensured protections for union organizing with union security being one of its main tenets once employees had chosen to organize.

In 1947, the Taft-Hartley Act was passed by Congress, over the veto of President Harry Truman with the president calling it a “slave labor” act. A year later, Truman campaigned against a “do nothing congress” and won re-election in a landslide. However, the act gave states the right to impose a right to work status on workers and many did just that.

Just this week, the Republican-controlled house in Indiana passed a work to right to work bill through its Employment, Labor and Pensions Committee by a vote of 8-5 in what was called a “charade” vote by state Rep. David Bartlett after a five minute hearing where no amendments were allowed and no discussion heard. Fellow Democratic state Rep. Clyde Kersey stated, “I think the light of democracy just went out in the Indiana House,” after the vote was taken. A vote to pass the measure in full can be taken as quickly as later this week.

A few things known about right to work states is that on average, workers make $5,333 less a year than in non-right to work states. Workers are still protected from paying union dues if they conflict with their beliefs and workers are better protected in states where there are protections in place for workers. The only ones benefitting from a right to work statute are employers, not workers. Employers will save money from this law, not the other way around. In states where a right to work law was enacted, such as Oklahoma, where job creation was touted, no such job creation took place and manufacturing jobs have actually been lost.

This cynical and broad-based attack on workers’ rights from Republicans and chambers’ of commerce benefits no one and in the long run will hurt the economy of Indiana as workers have less and less to spend with lower wages. Now is not the time to be decreasing the earning and spending power of the local workforces.