PawSox versus the public: I-195 land inspires dueling imaginations


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
2015-07-13 It's Your Park 5875
The site looks like a big empty lot…

The parcel of land in Providence being eyed as the site of a new stadium by the new owners of the Pawtucket Red Sox became the scene of dueling imaginings as Charles Steinberg led a group of PawSox employees on a tour of the site with Paws, the PawSox mascot and PawSox ballplayer Matt Spring. Steinberg invited those in attendance to imagine the ballpark his boss, Boston Red Sox owner Larry Lucchino, wants to build on this land with public money.

Meanwhile, a Facebook group calling itself “No new stadium for Providence” invited supporters to see the parcel of land as the park it was originally intended to be. “The public is invited to preview the park by picnicing, walking dogs, kicking soccer balls, blowing bubbles, flying kites (it is that big!), riding bikes and tossing wildflower seeds all over this huge, breezy, sunny space.”

Steinberg’s patter was essentially the same as the talks he’s been giving at the various cities he’s done his “Listening Tours” in. Steinberg talks about baseballs being batted into the water (by left-handed batters), the stadium being open for public use year round and the businesses that will crop up around the park. Members of the public critical of the planned stadium openly scoffed at the idea that the park would bring business downtown.

If either side were making new arguments, I didn’t hear them.

Some of the PawSox employees engaged with the public, as Steinberg wrapped up his tour and the crowd broke up into smaller groups. When a critic said, “No one who lives here wants a stadium here,” a PawSox employee answered that he lives in the area, “and I would love to see a stadium here.”

My best count is that out of 30-40 PawSox employees and 50-60 members of the public there in opposition, only one person not employed by Larry Lucchino, RI Future contributor Mark Gray, was willing to publicly declare himself as being in favor of moving the PawSox to a new downtown stadium.

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 5866
…but it’s on the water, and has plenty of geese.

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 5878

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 5919
There are small sections filled with wild flowers.

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 5921

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 5931
the PawSox brought their own home plate…
2015-07-13 It's Your Park 5946
… plus Matt Spring and Paws.
2015-07-13 It's Your Park 5952
PawSox employees and the skeptical public listened to Charles Steinberg…
2015-07-13 It's Your Park 5969
Charles Steinberg

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 5974 PawSox

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 5976 PawSox

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 5978

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 5979

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 5994
The employees, including Paws, seemed convinced.
2015-07-13 It's Your Park 6001
The public is doubtful.
2015-07-13 It's Your Park 6037 Games
Imagine a park here…

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 6048 Games

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 6051 Games

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 6061 Games

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 6068

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 6069
Mark Gray

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 6078 Games

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 6089

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 6119 Games

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 6132 Games

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 6135 Games

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 6141
Paws, imagining a baseball park…
2015-07-13 It's Your Park 6194 PawSox
PawSox employees don’t like the attitude of the skeptical public…

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 6208 Games

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 6213 PawSox

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 6216
Matt Spring and Paws at Home Plate, but the public wasn’t buying into it…

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 6229 PawSox

2015-07-13 It's Your Park 6242 Games
Right field or a picnic area?

Patreon

NBC10 Wingmen: Charter schools, trucker tolls and PawSox


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Don’t be thrown off because Jon Brien and I start out with bickering over where the Pawtucket Red Sox should play ball, we actually end up having a pretty decent debate about charter schools – though we didn’t really touch on the real issue, which is how do we fund them.

News, Weather and Classifieds for Southern New England

brien bob

Mayor Grebien rallies support, says new owners are no Ben Mondor

DSC_3426
Don Grebien

The potential move of the Pawtucket Red Sox to downtown Providence has caused heated debate between the public and the General Assembly since the idea was first floated earlier this year. On Thursday, opponents of the move rallied outside of the State House to express their passionate disapproval for the move.

Pawtucket Mayor Donald Grebien shared his own memories of McCoy Stadium at the rally, saying that he knows that he’s not the only one with such an emotional attachment.

“Like many of you, the first baseball game I ever attended was at McCoy. As a kid, I used to go to McCoy with my parents and grandparents to enjoy the games and see the future Red Sox greats before they were household names,” he said.

“I am certain all of you have similar experiences and traditions that you hold dearly as well. The memories and traditions formed at McCoy are things we all cherish. Memories we fear Rhode Island’s kids may never get to experience for themselves.”

Grebien continued to speak about the stadium’s previous ownership under Ben Mondor, and how Mondor was dedicated to the Pawtucket community as well as the team. The new ownership does not hold such sentiment.

“The new ownership has a very different business model, one that some could say is totally contrary to what exists there now. It lacks the vision, compassion, and commitment to the core principles that have made the franchise so successful,” Grebien said.

After his speech, Grebien added that the citizens of Pawtucket have not been involved in any of the business decisions the new owners have made. Residents have not even been made privy to the feasibility study that was reportedly conducted to determine the condition of McCoy.

“What we’re trying to understand, and what we’ve asked for from the ownership, is a feasibility study that they’ve done to give us an idea. How bad is it? If it’s bad, show us it’s bad,” he said.

Grebien is not the only one who feels this way, though. Sam Bell, the Rhode Island State Coordinator for the Progressive Democrats of America, has his own reasons opposing the PawSox becoming the ProvSox.

“There’s so many issues,” he began. “It starts with the basic principles of the public planning. Taking away a public park, flooding the area with surface parking, clogging out businesses, creating massive amounts of noise that disrupts the residents who live there.”

According to Bell, most people who he has spoken with who live or work around the vacant I-195 lands, which is where the new stadium would be built, do not want it there. The request for public money to help fund the project is also wrong in Bell’s eyes.

“It’s the public’s money. The amount they’re asking for is grotesque,” he said. “The amount they are asking for here is obscene to a degree that we often don’t even see.”

“I actually think it’s bad for Providence, to move it into that location, which is going to be a park, and it would hurt Pawtucket to leave it. One of the great things about this is that there’s so many issues and people come at it with so many different perspectives, but everyone agrees, we have to stop this deal,” Bell added.

Economic development has been one of the biggest talking points in support of a new stadium. Sharon Steele, a board member of the Jewelry District Association, finds that exact reason is why everyone should be fighting against a stadium. If a stadium were to be built, it would only bring minimum wage jobs, rather than small businesses that could directly benefit the community. Steele also mentioned that the park would help to draw in business more so than a stadium.

“Parkland is a hugely important center place for appropriate development,” she said. “Whether you look at Central Park, or you look at all the other magnificent parks across the country, and the I-195 land was specifically made for economic development, and a stadium simply does not fulfill that specific requirement.”

With both the House of Representatives and the Senate in recess until September, it’s hard to say what the fate of the PawSox will be. Speaker of the House Nicholas Mattiello has given his support for the move, but he has also said that he will not go against what the public ultimately wants. Unless something major happens between now and September, the public seems to believe that the PawSox should stay right at home, in Pawtucket.

Sam Bell
Sam Bell

DSC00908

DSC_3444

DSC_3440

DSC_3420

DSC_3419

DSC_3417

DSC_3413

DSC_3411

DSC_3408

DSC_3398

DSC_3388

DSC_3382

DSC_3365

DSC_3359

DSC_3351

DSC_3350

DSC_3337

DSC_3325

DSC_3322

DSC_3309

Public park is a better amenity than baseball stadium


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

PawSox Petition 02The May 27th commentary that dominated the Providence Journal editorial page with yet another large, beautifully rendered artist’s conception of the proposed AAA ballpark features the headline DOWNTOWN PARK WILL BE R.I. GEM needs careful scrutiny. If only we could substitute ‘park’ wherever ‘ballpark’ is featured in the commentary’s 12 paragraphs, we could join Miami, Chicago, NYC, Westerly R.I. and countless other cities large and small that understand that the public park is the lungs of the city.

The commentary erroneously states that the ballpark “using languishing land can add 2.5 million to R.I. revenues.” That very land was set-aside at its inception to become the gem of the whole I-95 land for the downtown public park. Architects, designers, artists know the power of the visual image. The newspaper has generously featured and dutifully printed colorful images to accommodate the ballpark teams constant access to the editorial page. The lawmakers and other powerful groups for the most part seem to have been seduced, cheerleading the proposal or worst still sitting on the fence.

For an honest debate to continue on such a statewide important issue, each side should be given an equal chance to participate. The park advocates deserve access to the editorial pages as well where a small public fund should be set aside for a competition to select an image for the downtown park. We appreciate the push for job creation that the I-195 district offers. We must however understand that jobs must go hand in hand with quality of life and not lose sight that inside the new buildings that are being proposed there will be quality institutions and a workforce that values access to nature in the city as one of its highest priorities. The development of a state of the art park bordering our restored, rejuvenated, active river with its world renowned Waterfire attraction should be the first and the key parcel to be realized in order to set a standard for excellence equal to the NYC Highline Park and the ensuing inspired architecture it commanded.

State House leaders presented 13,000 signatures opposed to PawSox move


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

PawSox Petition 02David Norton, representing Organizing For Pawtucket, delivered petitions to Governor Gina Raimondo, Speaker Nicholas Mattiello and Senate President Teresa Paive-Weed on Tuesday afternoon. Over 13,000 Rhode Island residents signed the petition demanding that the PawSox stay in Pawtucket and that no tax dollars be spent on the construction of a new stadium in downtown Providence.

According to the press release:
Today we are delivering 13,000 petition signatures to Rhode Island leadership.  As the most powerful legislator in Rhode Island, Speaker Nicholas Mattiello has the power to say NO to PawSox principal owner Larry Lucchino.  We are calling on him specifically to take action on this issue.

13,000 Rhode Islanders and people at every point across the political spectrum in Rhode Island – from the Tea Party to the Progressive Democrats – are in agreement:  Speaker Mattiello, MAN UP and tell PawSox principal owner Larry Lucchino NO!

A small group, followed by news cameras, first went to the Governor’s office, where a staffer politely accepted a box containing copies of all the signatures. The group then went to the third floor and to the Speaker’s office, where the reception was a good deal more chilly. At one point the Speaker’s staffer got up and left the room, only to return a moment later to tell Norton to place the petition on the floor next to her desk.

The surprise came at the Senate President’s office, when Paiva-Weed opened the door to her office herself. Perhaps the Senate President was equally surprised to see a group of news cameras and activists at the door when she opened it, but if so, she didn’t show it, much.

Paiva-Weed graciously accepted the petition and promised to keep the interests of Pawtucket in mind during negotiations.

You would think it would be all but impossible to ignore 13,000 signatures.

You can watch the petition signature delivery below:

PawSox Petition 01

PawSox Petition 04

PawSox Petition 03

Patreon

Providence Foundation stadium report cherry picks data


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.011The Providence Foundation‘s report in favor of building a new stadium in downtown Providence for the PawSox  reads as a sales pitch for the PawSox owners rather than as a sober economic analysis of the pros and cons of a stadium being built downtown with public funds.

Identified as a “business-backed group” and “an affiliate of the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce,” The Providence Foundation released this report recommending that “the state, the city, the I-195 Commission and the [PawSox] team owners” come to an agreement and build a new stadium downtown.

Unfortunately, the first third of the report, in which the economic and “catalytic” effects of the proposed ballpark on “real estate development, economic development” and job development, commits egregious methodological errors.

The authors of the report reviewed eight “downtown stadiums” and came to the astounding conclusion that, “in all cases… [the stadiums] have been major factors in the increase of restaurant and retail sales in the area. The facilities have assisted the tourism and convention business and, in some cases, are selling points in the attraction of new companies into the respective cities.”

The stadiums selected for analysis were:

BB&T Ballpark, Charlotte, NC
Chickasaw Ballpark, Oklahoma City, OK
Durham Bulls Athletic Park, Durham, NC
Fifth Third Field, Dayton, OH
Fifth Third Field, Toledo, OH
Huntington Park, Columbus, OH
Regions Field, Birmingham, AL
Southwest University Park, El Paso, TX

No criteria is given as to why these eight stadiums were selected to be reviewed by the report or why dozens, if not hundreds of other sports arenas nationwide were left out. Could this be because the eight stadiums were hand selected by PawSox owners as representing the best eight examples of successful stadium building across the country? I asked Daniel A. Baudouin, executive director of the Providence Foundation for clarification on this point.

“[W]e selected stadiums that were in downtown areas that were constructed/renovated recently and ones that have some geographic diversity” he said in an email to RI Future. “We could have selected more stadiums that were built less recently and as we understand it, have been successes in being a positive force in downtowns (Memphis, Buffalo, Louisville, Norfolk).”

Three of the stadiums included in the report, Durham, El Paso and Toledo, were specifically mentioned by late PawSox owner James Skeffington in conversation with Dan McGowan back in February as models for the proposed Providence stadium. Skeffington mentioned BB&T Ballpark to reporters on April 2 during a tour of the I-195 land. Dayton is mentioned as an model ballpark by Skeffington in this Projo piece. Birmingham is showcased on the Baseball RI site that the PawSox owners are using to sell the idea of a downtown ballpark while Oklahoma is mentioned on the Baseball RI site here.

With all but one of the Providence Foundation’s case studies having been vetted by James Skeffington and the PawSox owners, people who stood to make millions from the proposed ballpark, it’s small wonder that the report was favorable.

Speaker Nicholas Mattiello’s stadium consultant Andrew Zimbalist said in 2009 that, “One should not anticipate that a team or a facility by itself will either increase employment or raise per capita income in a metropolitan area.”

Sports economist Victor Matheson, who spoke at the Blackstone Valley Visitor’s Center on May 13, agreed with Zimbalist. There is, said Matheson, “remarkable agreement among economists finding that spectator sports result in little or no measurable economic benefits on host cities,” said Matheson.

“To your question on overall economic benefits,” said Baudouin, “I will leave that to economists; we did not analyze the macro-economic impact.” That’s a fine distinction to make, except that one of the questions the report was trying to answer is, “Will the stadium be a positive force/catalyst for real estate and economic development in the vicinity of the stadium?” That’s a macroeconomic impact by definition.

In addition to picking only those examples that might prove the case they wanted to make, The Providence Foundation failed to mention the “substitution effect,” described by sports economist Brad Humphreys, in this piece by Melissa Mitchell:

As sport- and stadium-related activities increase, other spending declines because people substitute spending on sports for other spending. If the stadium simply displaces dollar-for-dollar spending that would have occurred otherwise, there are no net benefits generated.”

So how did the Providence Foundation come to such a radically different conclusion from all experts in the field of sports economics?

They cherry picked the data, of course.

Cherry picking, or suppressing evidence, is “the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position, while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position.”  It’s a well known logical fallacy, but when done intentionally, it is less an error than it is an attempt to deceive.

Whether by accident or design, The Providence Foundation report on a potential downtown Providence ballpark is not of high value, and its issuance calls into question the putative logic behind all the economic positions maintained by The Providence Foundation and the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce. Both groups regularly lobby state and local legislatures on a host of issues, such as minimum wage and progressive taxation.

It is way past the time to stop seeing the claims “business backed groups” as factually grounded, but to instead recognize them as sophisticated sales pitches.

Patreon

Video: Stadium opponent Tim Empkie


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Tim EmpkieDr. Tim Empkie came to Rhode Island 30 years ago for a job at Brown University.  In recent months, Empkie has become one of the most familiar and visible stalwarts in the ongoing campaign to prevent public funds being used in the construction of a new stadium in downtown Providence. He’s one of the driving forces in the voter initiative profiled by RI Future here. I talked to Empkie during morning rush hour at the corner of Point and Wickendon St.

We didn’t talk about the stadium so much as what the public reaction to his advocacy has been like.

Empkie also shared his thoughts on living in Rhode Island.

Patreon

Voter initiative launched to stop downtown stadium deal


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

providence-stadium-rendering-april-2015Since the idea first surfaced to move the Pawtucket Red Sox to downtown Providence, many Rhode Islanders have feared a backroom deal would be made – regardless of the project’s merits – between the affluent owners and local politicians. But Sam Bell says a start-up group calling itself the Providence Campaign Against the Stadium Deal has a plan to make sure the decision is made by the people of Providence instead.

“We are now more than halfway towards the 1,000 signatures we need to send our anti-stadium ordinance to the City Council,” Bell told RI Future in an email.

He explained, “Our voter initiative uses Section 209 of the Providence Home Rule Charter, which allows us to collect 1,000 signatures to bring an ordinance to the City Council.  If the City Council does not approve it, the Charter allows us to collect more signatures to put it on the ballot.”

The same Providence process allowed hotel housekeepers last spring to put on the ballot a $15 an hour minimum wage for that industry but the idea was squelched when the General Assembly passed a law forbidding municipal minimum wages that differ from state law.

Bell said the anti-stadium “initiative forbids the stadium from being built on the part of the I-195 land designated a public park, and it forbids Providence from providing any special financial treatment for the stadium, including tax breaks.”

He said the formal campaign against the downtown stadium began collecting signatures 8 days ago and has already amassed more than 500. There is no deadline for reaching the requisite 1,000, he said.

“Providence residents are incredibly opposed to the stadium deal, but popular sentiment is not always heard in the back rooms of the State House and City Hall,” Bell said. “What makes us so excited about this campaign is that it gives the power back to the people. We hope to win the support of the City Council and the Mayor in our campaign to stop the stadium deal.  If not, we will stop it at the ballot box.”

Andrew Zimbalist’s ‘problematic’ history


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

PawSoxSmith College sports economist Andrew Zimbalist has a long history delivering consulting reports that contain exactly what his clients want to hear. Has House Speaker Nicholas Mattiello hired the best person to “independently assess and review” the Pawtucket Red Sox proposal?

In 2013 Andrew Zimbalist was interviewed by Stephen Nohlgren for the Tampa Bay Times about moving the Tampa City Rays to a new stadium downtown. When asked if the Rays need a new stadium, Zimbalist was adamant that the answer was yes. When asked where the stadium should go, Zimbalist replied in a way that should be familiar to Rhode Island residents paying attention to his statements regarding the proposed downtown stadium.

Downtown Tampa. It’s very important in today’s economics that stadiums be located as close to a business district as possible — particularly baseball, that can play six or 7 games a week. It enables the team to attract members of the business community to the stadium at the end of the work day and sell season tickets and premium seating.”

Andrew-Zimbalist-590x900It was at this time that Tampa Bay sports reporter Noah Pransky first discovered that Zimbalist was a paid consultant for Major League Baseball. The Tampa Bay Times, in response to this information, said, “The Times did not know of any ongoing relationship between Zimbalist and Major League Baseball when it published an interview with him on Jan. 21. If we had, we would have disclosed that to our readers.”

Zimbalist seems to make a habit of avoiding full disclosure. Amy Anthony of the Associated Press exposed Zimbalist’s ties to Major League Baseball for Rhode Island readers the day after Speaker Nicholas Mattiello hired Zimbalist as a consultant for $225 per hour. This was not information either Zimbalist or Mattiello felt the need to disclose when the hiring was announced.

Zimbalist and Mattiello further failed to disclose that Zimbalist had toured the proposed downtown Providence site for the PawSox stadium with the late James Skeffington. It is impossible to imagine that Skeffington, who co-owned the PawSox with Boston Red Sox owner Larry Lucchino, did not give Zimbalist the full on sales pitch with the tour.

ProductImageHandlerNeil deMause is a journalist and a regular contributor to Vice Sports, Al Jazeera America, Extra!, City Limits, the Village Voice, and other publications. He’s the author of Field of Schemes: How the Great Stadium Swindle Turns Public Money into Private Profit for which Zimbalist was an important source.

I asked him about Zimbalist’s reputation as a gun for hire.

“I think gun for hire may be overstating it a little bit,” said deMause, “he is certainly willing to work for anyone who wants his services. And at times, it has caused problems for him.”

Zimbalist, says deMause, “was one of the first economists to really look seriously at stadium financing and has done a lot of great work on that. He also, in the last 10 to 15 years, has started doing a lot of consulting work. He has worked for various different sides. He has worked for cities trying to evaluate whether or not they should spend on teams and he has worked for the owners of the Brooklyn Nets, trying to argue that New York City should put money into an arena.

“One reason I think its problematic is that once you start taking money from someone who has a stake in the game, you have an incentive to spin your findings to make who’s paying you happy.”

One “problematic” example from deMause is a blog post he put together entitled “Zimbalist v. Zimbalist” in which Zimbalist’s statements made at different times for different audiences are contrasted.

Most of this public spending will be of direct benefit to the community, and a significant share will come back to the state and city. … As an investment, the Yankees‘ stadium plan is a winner for the Bronx and all of New York.
-Andrew Zimbalist, New York Times op-ed, 1/22/06

Practically every stadium that’s come on stream in the last 20 years in the United States has been accompanied by a consulting report – these are hired-out consulting companies – that are working for the promoters of the stadium. They engage in a very, very dubious methodology. They make unrealistic assumptions and they can produce whatever result they want to produce.
-Andrew Zimbalist, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, 12/22/04

Together with the development of surrounding commercial space and the prospect for a new Metro-North platform, the project will be a major facelift for the area and help gentrify the South Bronx.
-Andrew Zimbalist, New York Times op-ed, 1/22/06

The notion that you’re rejuvenating the waterfront because you put a baseball stadium there frankly is silly. … It’s used for four hours a day when it’s used. And those four hours have tens of thousands of people inside the stadium. They’re not outside milling around on the streets buying shirts and hot dogs. They’re inside spending money on concessions that are managed by the owner of the baseball team.
-Andrew Zimbalist, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, 12/22/04

At the time, deMause found Zimbalist’s opinions on a proposed Yankees stadium “puzzling” and “baffling.” deMause called an op-ed Zimbalist wrote for the New York Times, “shoddy work.”

For an example of seriously shoddy work from Zimbalist though, we have to go to 2008, when Zimbalist appeared in court as an expert witness in a dispute between the City of Seattle and the Sonics. As reported by Greg Johns,

“Zimbalist… told attorneys in a pretrial deposition that he produced a unique report on the Sonics’ situation after researching the situation, seeking up-to-date opinions from other economists and spending 20-25 hours writing the paper.

“But [Sonics attorney Paul] Taylor put page after page of Zimbalist’s Seattle report on a screen, adjacent to a 2005 report the Smith College professor prepared for a similar case involving the Anaheim Angels.

“The wording was virtually identical in both reports, with ‘Anaheim’ or the ‘Angels’ simply replaced by ‘Seattle’ or the ‘Sonics.’

“‘Did you just go into your computer and change words?’ Taylor asked.

“‘I have notes I use to draft my reports,’ Zimbalist responded.

After Taylor presented more and more identical pages, Zimbalist allowed that ‘it seems to be the same language.’

When Taylor asked Zimbalist ‘how many thousands of dollars’ he charged the city of Seattle for preparing his report, Zimbalist replied, ‘I have no idea what I have invoiced to date.’

“I think the problem,” said deMause to me in our interview, “is less the billing than that he took the same research and came to the opposite conclusion. That was a little problematic.”

When Zimbalist was working as a consultant for the New York Nets to secure public financing for a new arena in Brooklyn, says deMause, he was trying to find out, “how many people would go to a game in Brooklyn from outside New York. This is a huge issue, because is [the arena] really going to bring in new spending or will it be the people who are going to be in the city any way?”

deMause continued,

So he didn’t have Nets season tickets residents numbers, I don’t know why he didn’t, so he took the Jets number and he said, okay, they play in New Jersey, it’s pretty much the same thing… and uh, maybe? I mean, they have a different fan base, people travel to football games on weekends and basketball games during the week…

“That wasn’t necessarily the wrong thing to do, but it’s a temptation to say, okay, this will show the finding that I’m being paid for. It will make the client happy. It’s economically legitimate,  so sure, why not?

“That’s where Andy runs into criticism. Is he sticking to what he thinks is the absolute best economic answer to some of these questions, or is he justifying what the client wants?”

Speaker Mattiello is paying Zimbalist $225 per hour plus expenses, according to the contract acquired by RI Future. For this Zimbalist is to act as a consultant and adviser to the House Policy Office, “independently assess and review the Pawtucket Red Sox Proposal,” “provide a weekly progress update to the Director of the House Policy Office [Lynne Urbani]” and “be responsible for submitting to the Joint Committee on Legislative Services a summary” of his findings.

Zimbalist is “still a good economist,” says deMause. “I learned a ton from him when my co-author and I were working on our book. And he’s inspired a good, new generation of economists.”

However, “There are so many people out there who do not have this conflict of interest you could hire that it seems questionable to hire Andy Zimbalist when you could get Victor Matheson or a Brad Humphries or all these other people.”

Patreon

Video: Victor Matheson’s PawSox presentation


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
buckingham_matheson
Dr. Victor Matheson

The presentation Dr. Victor Matheson, professor of economics at College of the Holy Cross, gave to a capacity crowd at the Blackstone Valley Visitor Center in Pawtucket last Wednesday on the economics of public money funding sports stadiums, and specifically on public money building a new stadium in downtown Providence for the Pawtucket Red Sox (PawSox), has many people wishing that they were able to see and here it.

My write-up could only skim the surface of Matheson’s compelling presentation, which was an in depth condemnation of the very idea of public money for stadiums or an economic boom commensurate with such and investment. As we wait for sports consultant Andrew Zimbalist to complete his report for Speaker Nicholas Mattiello and for Governor Gina Raimondo to resume negotiations with the PawSox owners in the aftermath of the surprising and sudden death of the stadium’s chief proponent, James Skeffington, I can present Dr. Matheson’s complete talk, with the original slides from his PowerPoint presentation.

Maybe not as good as being there, but it’s a close second.

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.001

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.002

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.003

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.004

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.005

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.006

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.007

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.008

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.009

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.010

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.011

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.012

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.013

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.014

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.015

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.016

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.017

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.018

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.019

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.020

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.021

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.022

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.023

Minor League Baseball - Blackstone Valley 2015 -May.024

Patreon

Speaker’s consultant toured proposed PawSox site with Skeffington in April


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Andrew-Zimbalist-590x900
Andrew Zimbalist

James Skeffington treated Andrew Zimbalist to a private tour of the downtown Providence site he envisioned as the new home of the Pawtucket Red Sox on April 15, two weeks before the influential sports economist became a $225-an-hour consultant to House Speaker Nicholas Mattiello on the idea.

“I wasn’t in town for the tour,” Zimbalist told RI Future. “I was in town for a lecture at Brown that I was committed to for many months. Skeffington and I spent about 30 minutes together total. We shared no meals or drinks. I had never met him before. I requested a tour after multiple requests from RI media to comment on [the] stadium.”

When asked how the tour and the meeting with Skeffington affected his opinion of the proposed stadium, he said, “I didn’t change my tune.”

House spokesperson Larry Berman, told RI Future that the Speaker “was made aware that Mr. Zimbalist requested a brief tour of the proposed site when he was in Providence attending an event at Brown University.”

Mattiello and Zimbalist both said there was no involvement from PawSox owners in Zimbalist’s hiring. The Providence Journal reported that “Mattiello said he asked the House policy director, Lynne Urbani, to research experts in the field of baseball stadiums and Zimbalist came ‘highly recommended.'”

Berman said Urbani came to recommend Zimbalist after she “read several articles which [Zimbalist] authored and/or was quoted on as an industry expert on sports economics and stadium proposals.”

Zimbalist first entered the Pawsox story on March 27, when RI NPR’s Scott McKay quoted him in a commentary piece.

Andrew Zimbalist a Smith College professor, is one of the foremost baseball economists in the country. He says, in general, that taxpayer subsidies for a stand-alone stadium with little else nearby ‘tend not to pay off economically.’

“Yet, Zimbalist says that there are psychic values to having a baseball franchise. As those of us who love baseball can attest, teams create community and civic pride. A new stadium could be a venue for high-school state championships and clinics for the young.”

Zimbalist struck an equally cautious tone when he was quoted in the Boston Globe on April 15, on the same day he toured the proposed stadium site with Skeffington.

Andrew Zimbalist, a sports economist at Smith College, countered that the cultural significance of bringing the PawSox to Providence could justify some public spending.

“‘I think this is a tremendous opportunity for the city and the state,’ he said.”

After the tour with Skeffington, Zimbalist became more excited with the project, as this April 17 piece from RI NPR’s Elisabeth Harrison shows. Note that this piece does not mention Zimbalist’s tour with Skeffington, though it is obvious that he has visited the site.

“But from his office at Smith College, sports economist Andrew Zimbalist said this proposal is different. For one thing, it involves the actual game of baseball, not some virtual game. And the site on the banks of the Providence River can hardly be beat.

“‘This ballpark is spectacularly situated. It’s close to downtown, it’s on the river, coming along with a riverwalk, it probably will promote hotel development there, there’s going to be a miniature baseball field, lots and lots of parking. It’s just a wonderful synergy possibility,’ said Zimbalist.

“By synergy, Zimbalist means the potential to bring visitors and other economic activity to downtown Providence. He said the PawSox estimate of $2 million in annual tax revenue from the ballpark is conservative. He believes the real number could be considerably larger down the road. And he points out the team is not asking the state or the city to shoulder any bond debt or cover cost overruns from construction.

“‘The fact that the owners of the team are putting forward $85 million, I think puts this in fiscal terms on the more generous side of these deals.’

“Zimbalist said the PawSox proposal should be seen as a starting point for negotiations. And he and Matheson agree the stadium would be a draw for the Providence waterfront. But the question remains just how much public money is worth plunking down to achieve it.”

Though Zimbalist insists that he didn’t change his tune, the evidence from news sources indicates a shift in his enthusiasm for the project after the tour with Skeffington.

This is the second time that Zimbalist’s neutrality on the subject of the moving the PawSox to downtown Providence has come under scrutiny. Zimbalist’s close ties to Major League Baseball, as a consultant, were revealed shortly after his hiring was announced on May 4.

When Speaker Mattiello hired Zimbalist, said Berman, quoted by Amy Anthony of the Associated Press, he “was aware of Zimbalist’s consulting work” with Major League Baseball and his relationship with the owners of the Boston Red Sox. Red Sox Owner Larry Lucchino is one of the owners of the PawSox.

“Anyone with that type of expertise has to be engaged in the industry,” Berman told the ProJo.

Patreon

Rest in peace, Jim Skeffington


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

bob skeffingtonJim Skeffington, longtime Rhode Island power broker and new owner of the Pawtucket Red Sox who pushed hard to move the team to downtown Providence, passed away this weekend.

No one yet knows what this means for the controversial project, but I’m sure I speak for many in wishing his family and friends comfort in their grief. It was easy to not like the proposed relocation of the beloved team, but it was hard not to admire Skeffington’s pleasant demeanor and laser-focus on his goal.

Here’s video, unedited, of Jim Skeffington selling his idea to a group at the Mt. Hope Neighborhood Association on Thursday night. He was scheduled to give another such presentation tonight.

 

Sports economist Victor Matheson: No public subsidies for new ballpark


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
buckingham_matheson
Victor Matheson

Dr. Victor Matheson, professor of economics at College of the Holy Cross, spoke to a capacity crowd at the Blackstone Valley Visitor Center in Pawtucket on the economics of public money funding sports stadiums, and specifically on public money building a new stadium in downtown Providence for the Pawtucket Red Sox (PawSox).

Overall, Matheson was not very amenable to the idea.

Matheson is an engaging speaker, an economist who specializes in sports. He prepared his remarks and his PowerPoint presentation for the price of a PawSox game, a hotdog and a beer, a far cry from the money Speaker Nicholas Mattiello or Governor Gina Raimondo are spending for their experts.

“Let me just lay it on the table here,” said Matheson at the start, “I’m going to be a critic of public subsidies for stadiums.”

providence-stadium-rendering-april-2015Showing the ubiquitous artists rendering of the proposed downtown stadium, Matheson said that it “would be a fantastic stadium for the owners to spend their own money on.”

Studying stadiums and their impacts, said Matheson, generates the “weird impression that the newer the stadium, the higher the attendance or the older the stadium, the higher the attendance.” McCoy Stadium, where the PawSox currently play, is the one of the oldest stadiums in the country.

Built for $1.5 million, McCoy was the most expensive stadium ever, in 1942. It’s construction, said Matheson, was a “massive debacle.” In 1966, when owners talked of moving out of the region, $100,000 in upgrades were done to McCoy, mostly taxpayer supported. In 1999, taxpayers ponied up for most of the $14.9 in needed upgrades, once again because the  owners threatened to move.

Matheson is not a fan of “Economic Impact” studies. If there is one thing to take home from his talk, said Matheson, it’s that “any economic impact study published by the people who are trying to justify public subsidies, you should always take with a grain of salt. And many grains of salt.”

There is, “remarkable agreement among economists finding that spectator sports result in little or no measurable economic benefits on host cities,” said Matheson, pointing out that money spent on such ventures is then not spent on other things a city needs. (Such as infrastructure, school repair and Medicaid, I will point out.)

Matheson then went on to explain how modern stadiums, unlike Fenway Park in Boston or Wrigley Field in Chicago, are not centers of economic activity that benefit surrounding businesses. Instead, modern sports stadiums are self contained oases surrounded by parking. The restaurants and amenities are not located throughout the city but within the stadium itself, generating revenue for the stadium owners, not the city.

Matheson compared minor league baseball teams to average 16-screen movie mega-plexes. In general, they perform about the same economically, yet no one is suggesting that movie theaters be publicly subsidized in anything like the kind of deal that baseball stadiums traditionally receive. “Are movie theaters exempt from sales tax, property tax, market value leases, etc.?” asked Matheson, “We would say that’s crazy.”

The kind of low paying jobs a minor league baseball stadium would generate will end up costing the state around $80,000 per year, per job. Matheson compared this number to the good paying jobs lured into South Carolina with the new Volvo plant. Good middle class jobs there cost the state $3,500 per year, per job in subsidies.

Towards the end of his presentation Matheson explored the possibility of the PawSox moving out of state in the event that they do not get the deal and the land they want in Providence. Looking at population statistics and the current locations of Major League, AA and AAA baseball teams, Matheson doesn’t see many viable options.

Matheson talked about the threats made by the owners of the Patriots when they talked about moving to Hartford or Providence. After not getting the deal they wanted from these other cities, they decided to stay in the Boston area, and built Gillette Stadium, because it was the best location, just as the Providence region (which includes Pawtucket) is the best place for the PawSox.

I hope to have the slides from Matheson’s talk soon and will post a video of his talk with the slides as soon as possible.

Patreon

Progressives, conservatives unite to fight downtown ballpark


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

SkeffingtonAn unlikely coalition of opponents to the proposed downtown Providence stadium deal greeted new PawSox owner Jim Skeffington as he exited his chauffeured ride and quickly entered the Rhode Island Commerce Corporation (RICC) offices at 315 Iron Horse Way.

Representatives and members of the RI Tea Party, The Republican Party, the Progressive Democrats of Rhode Island, The Green Party, Direct Action for Rights and Equality, Occupy Providence, The Rhode Island Sierra Club, RI Taxpayers, The Rhode Island Libertarian Party, and the Capital Good Fund stood side by side to take a stand against corporate welfare.

This event was put together by Coalition Radio’s Pat Ford and David Fisher, with help from Lauren Niedel of the Progressive Democrats. Ford acted as emcee for the event, in which 13 speakers and one poet spoke to a crowd of about 80 people. Inside the RICC offices, more than 100 more people attended the meeting where Skeffington and other PawSox owners revealed that they were amenable to negotiating a better deal.

Gina Raimondo essentially rejected the first deal offered, which would have, in the words of more than one speaker, “socialized the risk and privatized the profits” of the new venture.

Pat Ford spoke first, saying that “it is not the role of government to subsidize risk for private enterprise.”

Lauren Niedel of the Rhode Island Progressive Democrats put the deal into stark economic relief: As Rhode Island prepares to carve $90 million out of Medicaid, how can we justify giving away millions of dollars to millionaires?

Andrew Posner, executive director of the Capital Good Fund, said that “every day I look at families that are hungry, that are poor, that don’t have jobs… that’s what we should be spending our time and money talking about.”

The Tea Party’s Mike Puyana said that the deal is “something called crony corporatism, it’s as far from equality under the law as it’s possible to get.”

“I don’t think I ever imagined that i was going to be at a rally with the Tea Party on the same side,” said Fred Ordonez of DARE, “but here we are!”

On a more serious note, Ordonez said, “Every time we see a huge development get all kinds of tax breaks and tax subsidies, the poor communities in providence get poorer and poorer.”

Larry Girouard, of Rhode island Taxpayers, said that a new stadium downtown is the last thing we need to spur economic growth. “The issue is taxes, regulation, infrastructure. This is just a diversion from the real problems.

The Green Party, represented by Greg Gerritt, brought up some of the environmental concerns, such as the risks of moving the new sewer line. “When you do things like that, you can do it right, but often it introduces more leaks into a system.”

“The state of Rhode Island has no business taking money out of the hands of taxpayers and giving it to millionaires,” said Gina Catalano of the Rhode Island Republican Party, “to be expected to make that investment with zero return, is ludicrous.”

Representing the Sierra Club, Asher Schofield, owner of the small business Frog and Toad, hit the crowd with a baseball metaphor, and tried to inspire us all towards something better.

Providence is not a minor league city. We are what we dream ourselves to be. What we want to be. And we want to be major league. These are antiquated notions, the idea of public financing of private enterprise. This [deal] is not the grand notion that we need to have as a city moving forward… These minor league aspirations are beneath us.”

This deal, says Rhode Island Libertarian Party leader Mike Rollins, “is the exact opposite of everything we stand for.”

Occupy Providence’s Randall Rose made excellent points, and even read from a textbook about how bad it is for cities to invest money in minor league baseball teams. Rose read from the book Minor League Baseball and Local Economic Development, noting that, “there have been books on this, the scam is run so often.”

“The economic impact of a minor league team,” read Rose, “is not sufficient to justify the relatively large public expenditure for a minor league stadium.”

Steve Frias of the Republican Party, noted that the assembled crowd was comprised of people with “different viewpoints, but we all agree that this is a stupid deal.”

Roland Gauvin, an independent political activist, promised politicians who support such efforts that “a vote for this is the last time [politicians] will ever be voting, because we will vote them out of office.” Gauvin had especially choice words for Speaker of the House Nicholas Mattiello, saying, “And I will be willing to go to any district in Rhode island, starting in Mattiello’s district, and work my way down.”

Finally, before the crowd moved inside to join the RICC meeting already in progress, Cathy Orloff lead the crowd in a participatory poem against the stadium, with five baseball references built in.

DSC_5146
Skeffington

DSC_5160

DSC_5161

DSC_5188

DSC_5219

DSC_5253

DSC_5254
Roland Gauvin
DSC_5281
Pat Ford
DSC_5282
David Fisher
DSC_5286
Steven Frias and Greg Gerritt

DSC_5290

DSC_5299
Asher Schofield

DSC_5307

DSC_5315
Lauren Niedel

DSC_5319

DSC_5321

DSC_5331

DSC_5342
Andrew Posner

DSC_5353

DSC_5362
Mike Puyana
DSC_5367
Cathy Orloff
DSC_5374
Fred Ordonez
DSC_5382
Larry Girouard

DSC_5389

DSC_5394
Mike Rollins
DSC_5403
Randall Rose

DSC_5423

Patreon

RIPDA is against downtown stadium deal


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

skeff and rapp

In spite of a progressive plea to accept new ownership’s proposal to move the Pawtucket Red Sox to downtown Providence, the Rhode Island Progressive Democrats joined a large and bipartisan chorus of opposition to the idea. At its monthly meeting last night, the group “voted unanimously to oppose the stadium deal,” said chapter President Sam Bell.

Here’s the group’s press release.

One of our long-standing concerns with public policy in Rhode Island has been the misguided and corrupting practice of corporate welfare. We view the proposal from the new PawSox ownership group as an especially egregious example. To help move the team from Pawtucket to Providence, they are asking for $4 million per year cash from the state—on top of a complete exemption from property taxes. This is obscene.

On top of this, the state will now have to figure out some use for McCoy Stadium, a modern stadium that has received enormous amounts of public funds. Given the amount of taxpayer money Rhode Island has poured into McCoy Stadium, we find deeply troubling that this new ownership group would be willing to abandon it without compensating the state. Indeed, we believe this speaks to the corporate character of the new ownership group, and we remain skeptical that they—or whomever they eventually sell it to—will be any more loyal to Providence than they are to Pawtucket.

The prime defense of this proposal has been that other stadiums have received preposterous deals, too. While this is largely true, those deals tend to take the form of a free stadium owned by the state. This deal, which involves direct cash payments, goes even further. Moreover, this argument underscores a deeper concern. We worry this deal will be cited as precedent every time a politically connected corporate interest comes to the state for a handout. With the proposed radical expansion of the powers of the agency that did the 38 Studios deal, we worry that our state’s shameful addiction to corporate welfare will only accelerate.

The conservative machine that runs Rhode Island is currently pushing for brutal cuts to Medicaid, cuts that will cause untold pain among our most vulnerable citizens. They argue they need to do this because they can’t find the money. To even consider handing over public cash to corporate interests while championing these devastating Medicaid cuts demonstrates the machine’s hypocrisy.

While we expect that Nick Mattiello and the conservative House leadership machine are unlikely to oppose these payouts, we call on rank and file representatives to take a firm stand against such an absurd deal. We also call on Mayor Jorge Elorza and Council President Luís Aponte to reject any property tax break for the stadium.

It is time for Rhode Island to take a firm stand against corporate welfare and reject these absurd subsidies. Working families need help, not wealthy corporate interests.

A progressive plea for a Providence ballpark


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

4Looking out the window of my office at 10 Davol Square, I can see the empty piece of Providence where they want to build the new baseball stadium.

Just five weeks ago, this particular parcel of land, left vacant by the relocation of a stretch of interstate, wasn’t any more or less interesting to me than any of the other plots in the Jewelry District. Now, of course, it ignites the imagination of this and many other Rhode Island baseball fans on a daily basis.

When the new Pawtucket Red Sox owners’ proposal came out this week, I didn’t have any strong feelings about it. It sounded like a lot of money, sure. But I know that any successful stadium project relies on some form of public subsidy. $4 million a year (net $2 million, if the economic study commissioned by the owners group is accurate) didn’t sound like too steep a price to keep a critical Rhode Island institution.

But my fellow progressives quickly tore into the proposal like rowdy fans heckling the opposing team’s pitcher. Now, negative reactions to the proposal have come from all points along the political spectrum. But while I certainly didn’t expect all of my friends on the left to endorse plan without some criticism, I’ll admit I was surprised by the steady barrage of unequivocal NO!’s that have come from the left.

Instead of taking a thoughtful, considered approach to this proposal, or carefully positioning ourselves to make a reasonable counter-offer, why are so many progressives rejecting the whole plan outright, unwilling to even hear an argument?

“Because we’re fed up!” some of my fellow liberals will undoubtedly say. Hey, I get it. The frustration is understandable and very real. But letting that frustration get the better of us is a huge mistake. Staking out a position of extreme opposition just feeds the worst stereotypes perpetuated about progressives: that we’re out of touch and inflexible. That makes us easy to marginalize and ignore.

This is not 38 Studios. I know, it seems like an easy connection to make–they both have to do with baseball! Except beyond that thin connection, the two scenarios couldn’t be any more different.

Rhode Island made a loan guarantee to a sports hero who had zero experience running a business, he just happened to like video games.

In this case, we’re talking about giving tax breaks to a group of experienced business people who have already proven their success, who clearly know what they are doing, and who are throwing down their own $85 million to get the thing off the ground. Instead of a software company that will employ a handful of people until it inevitably collapses, this time we’re getting a physical sports facility that will enhance our city and state.

Comparing this–or anything–to 38 Studios is the cheapest and easiest piece of political rhetoric that can be employed in Rhode Island. It gets lobbed from the left, the right and the middle. The comparison absolutely does not apply here. I don’t expect that fact to stop people from making it, but I will hope against hope that progressives, at least, can ditch this cliche in favor of something a little more thoughtful.

There will always be “something better” to spend the money on. Yes, I know the schools and the roads and the bridges are literally crumbling. I know the health care system is in shambles. I know that way too many people will sleep on the streets tonight. We absolutely need to make serious investments in all of these areas. But making any of those things an either/or tradeoff against this baseball stadium is wrong-headed and in some ways disingenuous. How often do we criticize conservatives for making the allocation of public funds a zero-sum game? And yet here are doing the same thing.

According to this rationale, we have to have full employment, state of the art schools in every community, 100% graduation rates, free college tuition, zero homelessness, a cure for cancer, all of our energy coming from renewable sources, guaranteed pensions for every Rhode Islander and protected bike lanes in all 39 cities and towns before we can even begin to think about a new baseball stadium. I disagree.

Can we please stop demonizing those we don’t agree with? This does not just apply to some of the personal insults I’ve seen hurled at Mr. Skeffington. This is becoming a really troubling trend among progressives. I know it can be satisfying to go on social media and make public figures out to be villains; it’s also petty, dickish, and the absolute definition of counter-productive. I expect it from right-wing talk radio. I’m appalled and disturbed by it when it comes from liberals and progressives. Please stop.

We have to consider the noneconomic benefits. I recognize that baseball is a business. I also know that baseball is a vital American institution. And whether they’re called the PawSox, ProvSox, RISox or Rhody Sox, our beloved baseball team is a treasure that must be kept in Rhode Island. The proposed new facility will have economic benefits for Providence and Rhode Island. Just as important are the social and cultural benefits which are difficult (if not impossible) to quantify–these cannot be overlooked. Again, it’s not a zero-sum game.

Let’s find a way to make this work. Let’s recognize the importance of professional baseball to our cultural and civic landscape. You don’t have to be a huge fan of the sport to be able to acknowledge the contribution baseball has always made to our history, our society, and our way of life–and to understand that to lose this team would be a devastating psychological blow to the Ocean State. I think most of those who will read this do understand. I think knowing just how much it would hurt to lose our Sox is exactly why the reactions have been so visceral. “How dare these rich people extort us like this!” some say. And rather than be backed into a corner, throw up their hands and say “Fine, take the team somewhere else! We don’t need you!”

Believe me, I do understand this sentiment, even if I don’t agree with the characterization that this is extortion. It’s business, and we’ve been wrestling with the tension between baseball-the-beloved-national-game and baseball-the-money-making-enterprise since the first professional leagues came about. But to dig in and shout “no!” instead of finding a way to move forward is a mistake. To give up on keeping the team because of some misguided principled stand would just feed another pervasive stereotype about those of us on the left: we’re all too ready to cut of our nose to spite our face.

I recognize how difficult it may be for many readers to come around to accepting the team owners’ proposal as it currently exists. That’s fine. But if the root of the word “progressive” is “progress,” then who better than progressives to craft an open, accessible, and constructive dialogue so that we can reach an agreement that benefits us all, rather than just toss our bat and retreat back to dugout just because we didn’t like the look of the first pitch?

Jim Skeffington and Jon Brien want a downtown ballpark


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

skeffington10Is a new ballpark in downtown Providence corporate welfare or economic development? It doesn’t have to be either/or – but isn’t the real question: what is the best way to develop that land?

On NBC10 Wingmen, Jon Brien and I debate whether moving the Pawtucket Red Sox to Providence is the highest and best use of the I-195 land or is it another baseball boondoggle.

Below that, watch NBC 10 News Conference’s Bill Rappleye interview new owner PawSox Jim Skeffington.

News, Weather and Classifieds for Southern New England

Bill Rappleye interviews Jim Skeffington:News, Weather and Classifieds for Southern New England

News, Weather and Classifieds for Southern New England

Pick-Our-PocketSox: The joke’s on us


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Repeat after me: It is not the job of government to make it safe for businessmen to get rich…

skeffingtonI really wanted to write a satire, but I just can’t get any more absurd than entire tax-payer-subsidy of a baseball stadium downtown.

A bunch of rich white guys bought some baseball cards… er baseball slaves… er a baseball team… and they want us to cover their costs so they can take their clients and grandkids to a game.

Let’s just look at the facts behind a few assertions.

The team is taking a risk building it’s 38 Studios Stadium… Bullshit!

“We shouldn’t be taxed on something we put the money into,”
— James Skeffington owner of the In-Our-PocketSox

Really, James? Why not? Isn’t risk what private ownership is all about? You’re not taking any risk. You want…

  • $4 million a year in kickbacks. (offset by a theoretical $2 million in tax revenue)
  • a 30 year tax-free lease at $1/year on prime land in the center of Providence. Wait…. 30 years? No property taxes for Providence… Isn’t the team already threatening to welch on a tax-free lease in Pawtucket?
  • The option to buy the land at fair market value after the lease expires. Hmmm. Let’s think about this. 30 years from now, after everything’s developed. They’ll argue that they have to pay to tear down the stadium to develop that piece of land, so… it’s not worth that much. And if they ditch again, guess who foots the bill for deconstruction?
  • Has anyone mentioned the “naming rights” to this stadium? I can see a big jewelry  company kicking in a few million dollars… Who gets this cash?

What risk are you taking? Fronting the money knowing that you’re going to get paid? I’ll tell you what… You promise to pay me $4 million a year, and I’ll give you $2 million a year. I promise!

Economic benefits for owners… And no one else

  • Yes. People will get paid for construction.
  • And politicians will get campaign contributions and photo-ops
  • But raise your hands folks… how many of you have ever made a special trip to a minor-league ball game? Haven’t people been doing that at a lovely stadium in Pawtucket for years now? How much economic impact has that had? (Answer: NOT MUCH outside of Pawtucket)
  • On February 21, The Providence Journal ran an article headlined, “Minor league baseball: Squeezed by low pay” Here’s a quote from the article, “It would be difficult to spin the numbers in any way that suggests minor-league baseball players earn minimum wage.”
  • On April 17, that same paper ran an article, “Playing for free at McCoy Stadium rankles some bands” The PawSox are too cheap to pay bands to play. Hotdogs and soda? And they have to provide their own sound systems? Really?

If we don’t give them the money then the land will be empty and Rhode Island will go bankrupt…

  • As I recall, this public land was supposed to be a public park. It wasn’t supposed to be the economic savior of the entire State.
  • While empty land generates no revenue, it costs little to maintain and remains open for a real opportunity in the future.
  • Future uses for the land could be:
    • Taxable
    • A benefit to the public
    • Open more than a few hours a day.
    • Useable in the winter time (which is fairly long…)
    • Useable without the permission of a private corporation.
    • Etc.

If we don’t bribe the team now, then there are plenty of other cities that will…

Bye bye. Good luck. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.

Is Jim Skeffington selling snake oil or saving a baseball team?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
skeffington
Jim Skeffington

Like everyone on planet earth, I’m not sure where the Red Sox’ AAA affiliate would attract the most fans, make the most money and/or do the most economic good. But I’m fairly certain new Pawsox owner Jim Skeffington is using some tricky accounting and very high pressure sales tactics to get Rhode Island to finance the relocation of the business he just bought.

First the tricky accounting.

The stadium will be privately financed, Skeffington said today. But he’s asking for $120 million in public subsidies after he privately finances it. The cost to build is $85 million, so Skeffington makes a net profit of $35 million for privately financing construction of the stadium.

Skeffington, a lawyer from Barrington, would like his $120 million in annual payments of $4 million, please. And the state needs to both rent from him and then subsequently sublease back to him the stadium. So he gets to be both the landlord and its the tenant while taking in $35 million.

Skeffington even had the gall to claim the people would only owe him roughly half that, so long as his sales and hotel tax predictions ring true for the next 30 years. Never mind the property taxes his publicly funded private project deprives from the Capital City. Oh and, by the way, existing zoning laws don’t allow Jim Skeffington to build a baseball stadium there. So he’s going to need some laws changed, too.

As if all this Orwellian accounting isn’t bad enough, Jim Skeffington is doing all this under the ruse that the people need to save minor league baseball in Rhode Island. Nonsense! The PawSox were a perfectly fine franchise – if not a model organization – before Jim Skeffington came along. The only thing endangering minor league baseball in Rhode Island is Jim Skeffington’s willingness to move the team to Massachusetts.

It’s his team now and, Ben Mondor be damned, he can do with it what he pleases. And I don’t begrudge him for wanting the best patch of dirt in the state. But I’m of the mind that Jim Skeffington needs Rhode Island a lot more than Rhode Island needs a minor league baseball team, especially given that Skeffington says he’s in it for all the right reasons and it will cost us a slice of the most prime real estate we’ll ever sell.

Let’s call this guy’s bluff. At the very least, let’s not treat him like he’s a savior while he rakes us over the coals. The PawSox will be plenty fun to go see in Massachusetts, and we’ll all love talking about how they used to be here. Jim Skeffington, on the other hand, will go down in Rhode Island history as the cruel lawyer who took our team to Massachusetts. If Skeffington is really in it for the right reasons, then it is the state that should be negotiating from a position of strength.

The Providence WetSox


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The first thing that popped into my head when I heard that there were plans to move the Pawsox to downtown Providence near the river was, “Didn’t anybody check out that CRMC/URI flood map?”

And apparently nobody did. I’ve seen articles in the paper. I’ve even tweeted reporters. Nobody’s asking the question, “Is this stadium going to be built on stilts?”

Here’s my mock-up of the location of the stadium cobbled together from the rough info we’ve received, plus an overlay of the flood zone maps.

rough-flood

This map assumes sea level rises and storm surges. It doesn’t have potential hurricane or the 100 year flood levels.

So, here’s the pitch question…

“What are the new Sox owner’s plans to deal with or mitigate flooding during and after construction of a proposed stadium?”

Disclosures: I love baseball. I love Providence. I like the Pawsox. I don’t like public subsidies of businesses that will make millions and return little in the way of revenue and long-term growth/momentum to a city. Oh, and I’m not a GIS mapper…


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387