Tom Sgouros’ new book explains problems, solutions to banking crisis


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

IMG_4772-001Coming soon to your winter reading list: Tom Sgouros’ second book.

His first book focused on conservative mythology about the Ocean State, and this time the RI Future contributor and well-respected progressive policy analyst sets his sites on a national level with a look into the banking industry. It’s called, ‘Checking The Banks: The Nuts and Bolts of the Banking System for the People Who Want to Fix It.”

He calls it “a primer on banking language and practices… a modest list of useful concepts, a discussion of how banks work, and how they fail, as well as some suggestions for new institutions that might help make change.”

Sgouros uses his talent for making complex subjects easier to understand

The growth of banks from small institutions to large has had profound effects on all of us, not the least because of the necessary change in strategies to manage banking risk. When a bank makes a loan, it takes a risk that the loan may not be repaid. Banking is fundamentally about managing that risk, and other risks associated with the enterprise. But there are many ways to manage a risk. One way is to get to know your borrowers, to assess their needs, perhaps even to help them repay the loan with the occasional extension or refinance. In the case of a business loan, a bank could sometimes ease risk through introducing the borrower to potential customers for his or her businesses. Another way to manage risk is simply to find someone else to assume it. One way manages risk by reducing it; the other simply foists it onto a sucker.

But he not only points out the problems the banking industry faces, he also offers solutions with chapters on regulations, starting a bank, government funding, public banks and credit unions, among other ideas.

Traditionally, starting a bank is something for rich investors to do, but there are plenty  of others out there who have the capaicty to have an impact on our financial system…

The book, published by Light Publications, a Providence company owned and operated by Mark Binder, will be available commercially in the near future.

Council 94 should hire Tom Sgouros instead

sgouros
Tom Sgouros, left, and former RI Future editor/publisher Brian Hull.

At least if Council 94 was going to hire a blogger to do opposition research on its behalf, it should have shopped local! This is not at all any kind of slight on Ted Siedle, but I don’t believe there’s anything he can uncover about our pension investments that Tom Sgouros can’t do at least as well.

Sgouros, in addition to being the policy/financial wizard, is also a progressive Democrat who decided not to run for treasurer after labor threw its support behind Gina Raimondo. He also just wrapped up a very similar kind of forensic investigation into how the state uses the NECAP tests. I think he’s well qualified for this kind of employment.

Shop locally, Council 94, and offer the job of blogger-for-hire to Tom Sgouros too!

Mancuso: RI Board of Ed will debate NECAP use


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Eva Mancuso, chairwoman of the new state Board of Education, doesn’t think the NECAPs are the best test to use as a graduation requirement and said the board will revisit the decision to use it as such. There are unanswered questions about the tests effectiveness and whether or not local school districts support it, she said.

This will be the Board’s first debate on the NECAPs as a graduation requirement and/or high stakes testing as a graduation requirement (two separate debates, mind you!). The idea was initially passed two years ago  (correction: Jason Becker said it was 2008) by its predecessor, the Board of Regents.

High stakes standardized tests as a graduation requirement, a major effort of the so-called education reform movement that is causing controversy from Seattle to New England, became a high profile political issue this year when 40 percent of high school mancusojuniors didn’t score well enough to graduate from high school. This is the first year Rhode Island is using a standardized test as a graduation requirement and, unlike other standardized tests, the New England Common Assessment Program  was not designed to be used as a graduation requirement.

Tom Sgouros has argued it isn’t an effective tool for measuring individual student performance. The Providence Student Union raised the profile of the issue even higher when they organized a group of adult community leaders to take the test; 60 percent of them didn’t do well enough to warrant a high school diploma.

WaPost: Gist controversial on national level too


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

ccs-i-am-hereDeborah Gist is not only raising hackles with the education community here in Rhode Island, she’s doing it on a national level too! On Tuesday, Chiefs for Change released a letter attacking labor leader Randi Weingarten for opposing high stakes testing. Gist is on the board for Jeb Bush’s Chiefs for Change group and she co-signed the letter.

Only problem is, according to the Washington Post, Gist and the letter criticized Weingarten for something she didn’t say.

How’s this for a trick? Jeb Bush’s “Chiefs for Change,” a group of former and current state education superintendents, have attacked American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten for something she didn’t say — without even mentioning her name!

That’s right, a Washington Post education blogger – a fairly well-credentialed one, at that – says Gist and Chiefs for Change were being tricky. Valerie Strauss goes on to explain:

Let’s get this straight: Weingarten didn’t argue (as testing experts do) that using student standardized test scores to evaluate teachers and principals is wrong because the results are not reliable. She didn’t call for a permanent ban. She asked for a moratorium to make sure everyone is ready. Given that teachers are being evaluated on the student test scores, it seems only fair to give them enough time to actually learn the standards, develop lessons around the standards, and give students time to absorb them.

I don’t know if she was referring to Tom Sgouros specifically when she wrote that TESTING EXPERTS DO NOT THINK HIGH STAKES TEST RESULTS ARE RELIABLE, but she did give a shout to to the states that are struggling through the politics of it (emphasis mine):

Students in some states this spring started taking standardized tests supposedly aligned with the Common Core and there have been enormous problems reported by teachers and principals.

It’s well worth noting that Sgouros’ loudest criticism’s of Gist have been that the NECAP test isn’t aligned with Common Core. And like this Washington Post blogger, he’s also called her out for being disingenuous, too.