Community speaks out to defend Memorial Hospital Birthing Center from closing


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Ana Novais, Nicole Alexander-Scott, Kenny Alston
Ana Novais, Nicole Alexander-Scott, Kenny Alston

At the third and probably last community meeting being held by the Rhode Island Department of Health (RIDOH) to discuss the potential closing of the Memorial Hospital Birthing Center, well over a hundred people turned out to speak. Since the massive protest outside Care New England’s offices last week the movement to keep the birthing center seems to have grown. One speaker at this community meeting drove over an hour to speak her piece about the closing, because the birth of her child at Memorial four years ago was such a positive experience and so important to her.

Care New England announced the closing on March 2, RIDOH Director Dr. Nicole Alexander-Scott scheduled three hearings because under the law, RIDOH must approve any such closing. The process is called a Reverse Certificate of Need and there are procedures connected to the process that Care New England seems to have skipped when announcing the closing of the birthing center. The process is “intended to ensure access to quality health services and healthcare throughout Rhode Island.” Dr. Alexander-Scott has ruled that she must approve or deny the facility’s proposal within 90 days.

Chris Callaci, an attorney representing the nurses who will lose their jobs if the facility closes, pointed out that Care New England has not actually filed a plan for closing the birthing center, as required by law. The public, he says, is being forced to comment on a plan without any of the details of the plan. Further, he says that scheduling the hearings with barely a week’s notice may be a violation of the law. Calico claims that the first meetings must be scheduled no earlier than thirty days after Care New England has submitted a complete plan.

Because of the vagaries of RI public hearing law, the officials in attendance do not comment or answer questions from the public. So Dr. Alexander-Scott, Executive Director Ana Novais and Chief Legal Council Kenny Alston sat silently as patients, medical professionals and community members spoke out against the birthing center’s closure.

Many who live in Pawtucket and surrounding areas object to having their inpatient obstetrics services moved at the 11th hour to Women & Infants or Kent County Memorial Hospital. To interrupt pregnancy care for women who plan to deliver in April and May is a terrible physical and emotional inconvenience for mothers and families, never mind the increased travel time and the last minute loss of a doula.

One woman who is due in early May said that the only information she has received on the closing of the Memorial Hospital Birthing Center has been from those advocating against the closing. Official communication from Care New England has been scant.

Central Falls Mayor James Diossa said he is very concerned about the interruption of services at the birthing center. But he stopped short of calling on Care New England to change their plan. He simply wishes to be involved as a community partner to make the transition as safe as possible for the residents of Central Falls and Pawtucket. This is similar to the position staked out by Governor Gina Raimondo, who has announced no plan to intervene in the closing but who says she understands the pain being caused “as a mother.”

A doula testified that despite Care New England’s promise that all providers would be credentialed at Women & Infants or Kent, there is no process in place for her to be credentialed. In fact, Women & Infants requires an OB/GYN be present during the process. Since Memorial functions as a community service provider, there is no way most people who use Memorial Birthing Center can afford to have two providers present during the birth of their child.

This has the effect of medicalizing birth, something many women who wish to deliver their children object to.

“If Memorial closes,” said a mother planning to deliver in June, “my choices will be to have a home birth, which I do not want, or go to Cambridge. There is no other place offering the options I want.”

Memorial Birthing Center Public Comment

Patreon

1199 SEIU pickets for fair wages at Women & Infants


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Woman and Infants 001About 150 Women & Infants hospital staff and supporters engaged in an informational picket outside the hospital yesterday on icy sidewalks in a flurry of snow. The picket was held, says Patrick Quinn, executive vice president of District 1199 SEIU New England, (1199 SEIU) to inform the public of two concerns.

The first is that excessive executive salaries at Care New England, (CNE) the Massachusetts based management company that runs Women & Infants, are negatively impacting patient satisfaction. The second concern is about “travel nurses,” out-of-state temps, being hired over qualified local nurses.

Woman and Infants 183Regular readers may remember the travel nurses issue being raised back in June of last year. Travel nurses are temporary employees that allow hospital management to avoid new hires and promotion within the ranks. Travel nurses arrive from out-of-state and take most of their earnings out of state with them when they leave. Travel nurses miss out on the orientation regular staff receive, resulting in more mistakes for the regular staff to correct.

Patient satisfaction has been down since 2011, says 1199 SEIU citing Press Ganey, “an independent auditor that tracks patient satisfaction.” Perhaps not coincidentally 2011 is the near Care New England brought CEO Dennis Keefe on board. 1199 SEIU maintains that Keefe’s salary doubled after his first year and now tops $1 million. Meanwhile, funding for hospital staff and patient care is shrinking.

“These folks think that this is their personal piggy bank,” says Patrick Quinn, “management has embarked on a whole scheme of things to basically cut costs, reduce staffing, increase workloads and frankly, we’re sick of it.”

Care New England has not responded to a request for comment.

Woman and Infants 019

Woman and Infants 021

Woman and Infants 026

Woman and Infants 034

Woman and Infants 040

Woman and Infants 049

Woman and Infants 073

Woman and Infants 081

Woman and Infants 115

Woman and Infants 120

Woman and Infants 200

Woman and Infants 250

Woman and Infants 253

Woman and Infants 255

Woman and Infants 276

Woman and Infants 278

Woman and Infants 298

Patreon

Nurses to Women & Infants Hospital: stop hiring scabs (‘travel nurses’)


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

DSC_0636An all day picket was held at Women & Infants Hospital yesterday to call attention to the problem of temporary, out-of-state “travel nurses” filling scheduling holes than hiring in-state nurses graduating from one of the many fine colleges offering nursing degrees in Rhode Island.

“There are many qualified graduates from our numerous nursing programs looking for jobs,” said Patrick Quinn, executive vice president of 1199 SEIU New England, “so it baffles me that Care New England management would take advantage of all the tax breaks of a non-profit but not give back to the community when we have such a high unemployment crisis.”

Care New England is the company presently managing Women & Infants.

Hiring travel nurses means that the salaries leave the state when the nurses are done. There are no savings in terms of wages as travel nurses make two and three times the standard rate of pay. Further, all full-time permanent nurses are given weeks of in house training and orientation that the temporary travel nurses skip. They are simply plugged into scheduling holes without any real orientation or training in hospital specific policies. This creates even more work for the regular staff, who spend time correcting the mistakes of the travel nurses.

Given these issues, why use travel nurses? To avoid hiring more union workers, of course.

This is just another example of a company engaging in dangerous, impractical strategies to avoid treating workers with respect and dignity. Even as the ACA funnels millions of new dollars into the health care industry, private companies, eager to squeeze ever more profits for their shareholders and overpaid CEOs, take shortcuts at the expense of their staff and patients.

My wife and I went to Women and Infants over 20 years ago to have our three children. The experience was top notch, and the nurses were fabulous. To think that the new management might threaten the reputation of such a fine hospital by playing games with the quality of the staff is appalling. As Wendy Laprade, a Registered Nurse in the Labor and Delivery Room said, “Women & Infants… will only remain the premier women’s hospital in Southern New England if we hire and train the next generation of RN’s.”

With all the talk surrounding a new nursing school being built in Rhode Island, and knowing that there will be a huge demand for nurses as the population ages over the next decade, Care New England’s policy decisions seem extremely short-sighted and counterproductive. Currently there are 30-35 traveling nurses estimated to be working at Women & Infants. This Pro Publica piece from 2009 highlights some of the dangers these policies exacerbate.

Supporting the union effort at Women & Infants were several other unions, as well as gubernatorial candidate Clay Pell and many other candidates for office. Also out in full support of the union’s efforts were three of the four hunger strikers, Shelby Maldonado, Mirjaam Parada and Yilenny Ferrares, and other hotel workers who worked so hard for a living wage in Providence, only to be cut down by backroom dealings in the General Assembly.

Quinn
Patrick Quinn, 1199 SEIU

nurses

pell nurse
Clay Pell

DSC_0672

DSC_0687

DSC_0688

DSC_0705

DSC_0717

DSC_0720

DSC_0725

DSC_0738

DSC_0748

DSC_0762

DSC_0767

DSC_0782

DSC_0788

DSC_0800

DSC_0813

DSC_0835

DSC_0838

DSC_0848

DSC_0872
Seth Magaziner
DSC_0899
Guillaume de Ramel
DSC_0904
Frank Caprio
DSC_0916
George Nee, AFL-CIO RI
Stan Israel
Stan Israel, retired SEIU 1199 organizer

DSC_0931

DSC_0937
Shelby Maldonado, former hunger striker
DSC_0938
Mirjaam Parada, former hunger striker
DSC_0947
State Rep. Frank Ferri

DSC_0952

DSC_0955

DSC_0956

DSC_0958
Maureen Martin

DSC_0962

DSC_0968
Aaron Regunberg
DSC_0972
State Rep. David Bennett
DSC_0975
Yilenny Ferrares, former hunger striker

DSC_0981