The Woonsocket Cross boondoggle


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The Call reports that $9,806 of the $23,135 collected to defend the Woonsocket cross against a possible lawsuit by the FFRF has already been spent, even though there is technically no legal case to defend against.

The cross gained statewide and even national attention when an unknown Woonsocket resident asked the FFRF to look into the constitutionality of the cross’s presence in the parking lot of a Woonsocket fire station. A letter from the FFRF sent to then-Mayor Leo Fontaine’s office sparked outrage among some in the community.

Fontaine, who during his tenure as Mayor did almost nothing to alleviate the financial hardships facing Woonsocket residents, used the FFRF letter to galvanize supporters around an issue he thought he could win. Staking his political future on this idea, Fontaine worked to make the Woonsocket Cross a cause célèbre among the mostly Catholic residents of of the city. A huge rally was held, hosted by John DePetro of all people, that presented Bishop Thomas Tobin and the sorely out of place Reverend Donald Anderson speaking out in defense of the cross.

Money was raised to defend the cross against the possible lawsuit. A local lumber company started producing and selling miniature white crosses to display on front lawns. Displaying a cross demonstrated that you were on the “right” side of the issue. Not displaying a cross on your lawn might arouse suspicion: Is that the home of the unknown person who started this kerfuffle by contacting the FFRF in the first place?

Christmas ornaments, emblazoned with an image of the cross, were sold out of Woonsocket City Hall. This money, along with donations from all over the country, went into a pool to be used to defend the cross in the event that the FFRF filed suit.

Joseph Larisa, Jr. is the lawyer who was well paid, ($170 an hour for 58 hours of work: How many people in struggling Woonsocket are paid that well?) to essentially research the history of the cross and prepare some sort of “What if?” legal scenario in the event of a lawsuit. (I did a decent amount of historical research into the cross for free over the course of a few visits to the Woonsocket Library.  I also documented the existence of a host of other forgotten monuments and places in Woonsocket dedicated to fallen servicemen, no of which are considered as special as the one site bearing a huge white cross.)

As new Mayor Lisa Baldelli-Hunt has pointed out, “there had been offers from other lawyers at the time to provide legal counsel to the defense at no cost.” Apparently “fiscally conservative” Mayor Fontaine decided to pay nearly $10,000 for legal services he could have received for free.

So where is all this research into the history of the Woonsocket Cross? A lot of it went into the production of a 15 minute movie Mayor Fontaine made. One gets the impression that being the mayor of a financially struggling city isn’t all that difficult, or at least provides plenty of down time to play with Final Cut Pro. Mayor Fontaine should probably have secured the rights to the Saving Private Ryan theme music he “borrowed” in creating his movie masterpiece, but doing that would probably have cost the city the rest of its defense fund.

Who could have imagined that a ginned up controversy in defense of an unconstitutional monument would result in well meaning people from a struggling community lining the pockets of an already well-to-do lawyer?

Everyone.

In the meantime, people can sit back and enjoy what their $10,000 has bought them:

Category One Memorial Designation Commission?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Woonsocket Cross 01Where can I find the Category One Memorial Designation Commission? As far as I can tell, it does not exist, despite legislation passed last year mandating the creation of such an authority.

After the Freedom from Religion Foundation challenged the constitutionality of a large Christian cross on public land in Woonsocket, the General Assembly hastily passed, at 2:59am on the last day of the session, an odd and mostly useless bill, H8143A. The bill was originally written with the intent of getting around the First Amendment, specifically the part that says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;” which the Supreme Court has routinely held applies to the erection of permanent religious monuments on public land.

This bill established the “Category One Memorial Designation Commission,” a body of five nominees who will “hear and make determinations on requests by members of the general public to designate items within the state as category one memorial items.” Category one memorial items are those that have “attained a secular traditional, cultural or community recognition or value,” are located on government owned land, and were in existence prior to January 1, 2012. The hammer drops with this line: “The potential identification of an item or the item having recognizable identification with a known or established religion shall not exclude the item” from being so designated.

Once an item or memorial has achieved “Category One” status, what then? “Upon deliberation, the commission may communicate their majority decision to designate an item as such in written form to the city or town clerk of the municipality wherein the item is located, for recording in the land deeds, and to the chief executive of the municipality.”

That’s it.

Wait.

That’s it?

The original version of the bill, H8143, the one that did not pass, took a much harder stance, and contained the line that, “The state of Rhode Island declares that a category one memorial item shall not be deemed or viewed as the making of a law regarding the establishment of a state religion” and “It shall be the policy of the state to defend against any non-governmental challenge to the placement or continued existence of any category one memorial item on any state or municipal property.” The bill would have established a $1 million fund for the Attorney General to use in defending such items from lawsuits.

Of course this version of the bill, had it passed, would have never survived court scrutiny. The legislature can’t pass a law that violates the Constitution by inserting a clause that says such violations don’t count, so the watered down version was passed instead.

I recently got to wondering what the status of the “Category One Memorial Designation Commission” is right now. According to the legislation, the permanent commission is to be made up of five members, three to be appointed by the Speaker of the House and two by the Senate President. In February 2013, an odd numbered year, the Commission was to “elect from among themselves a chairperson.”

None of this has happened.

According to the Woonsocket Call, as of March 5, 2013 Representative McLaughlin, who authored the legislation, said “he is working with legislative leaders to make the first appointments to the commission.” This delay means that the Commission won’t be able to be established or begin its work until February 2015, since the legislation specifically says, “The members of the commission shall, in February of each odd-numbered year, elect from among themselves a chairperson.”

In the meantime, how is the important work of declaring certain memorials “Category One Items” to get done?

Representative McLaughlin seems to have confused the original, unconstitutional legislation with the declawed and useless legislation that passed, saying, “the law is in place to protect the monuments and others like it.”

Even the Woonsocket Call, which is sympathetic to the Woonsocket Cross, could not help but point out that “As written, the law seems only to define a category one memorial item and create a commission to so designate such structures, but it doesn’t specify any protections from legal challenges.”

I’ve written emails to Speaker Fox, Senate President Paiva Weed, the chairperson of the Rhode Island Historical Society and the the Adjutant General of the National Guard, all of whom are supposed to be involved with the commission member selection process, and to Representatives McLaughlin, Hull, Dickinson and MacBeth who wrote and introduced the bill, asking about the status of the commission.

But so far I have received no response.

Progress Report: Religious Symbols on Public Property in RI, Curt Schilling’s Fib, Local Journalism


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

There is a major and potentially very ugly battle brewing in the Ocean State that has nothing to do with tax rates, struggling cities or bankrupt ballplayers: I’m talking about religious symbols on public property, and it’s getting out of control.

The most recent example (which you learned about first from RI Future), a cross that a car wash owner put on a strip of city-owned land that he has long taken care of, is an interesting example: is it a religious symbol, a memorial or an act of protest? The business owner, Peter Montaquila, told WPRO yesterday he put it up to stand in solidarity with the Woonsocket Cross, also a less-than-Constitutionally-clear case.

But issues of legality are relatively easy to sort out … the danger is that the non-legal battle lines are being drawn in the sand – and the situation is getting tense. Montaquila, like the owner of the flower shop who refused to deliver a bouquet to Jessica Ahlquist when she won her case against a religious symbol in Cranston West High School, said he doesn’t want to do business with those who don’t agree with him on this issue. Could we start seeing signs in business windows: “We don’t serve atheists.”

Politicians, like Rep. John McLaughlin of Central Falls, and shock jocks like John DePetro, are fanning the flames with angry rhetoric against those who see a line between church and state.  Their colleagues should call them out and implore them to be leaders rather than instigators.

People take both their religion and their Constitution protections very, very seriously and this is the third such nasty fight over the nexus of the two in a year here in Rhode Island. Someone should step and act like a leader before something really ugly happens.

Speaking of John DePetro, he is inviting some interesting karma picking on Gov. Chafee’s 18-year-old son for having a party … the mean-spirited talk show host could find himself in a similar situation someday…

Don’t believe a word Curt Schilling says about Gov. Chafee’s public comments about solvency crippling the company … the Associated Press reports that 38 Studios was already considering bankruptcy by the time the story went public.

AP reporter Laura Crimaldi obtained the confidential documents that led to this very telling development. Unfortunately for Rhode Island, today is her last day with the Providence bureau as she is moving on to a job with Boston Globe … what a way to go out Laura and best of luck in Beantown!

Speaking of great local reporting … no one covered the local effects and reactions to the Supreme Court’s decision on the Affordable Care Act better than Ted Nesi yesterday (check out his blog for a variety of different stories). We pick on Ted often because of the pro-business/pro-establishment bias he sometimes displays, but it’s also well-worth pointing out that he is far and away the most talented journalist covering the Ocean State.

One more note about local reporting … here is Kathy Gregg’s lede from her story yesterday on campaigns for seats in the State House: “How many Rhode Island lawmakers will return to the State House next year without having to face an opponent? The answer is: very few.”  And here is the lede on her story today: “One out of five General Assembly incumbents is running unopposed.”

Is 20 percent “very few”? On the contrary, we think it’s a great many. Perhaps the Projo can report this yet another way tomorrow…

 

 

Chafee Should Veto Woonsocket Cross Bills


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

At 2:30 AM on the morning of June 13th, an hour before adjourning for the year, the General Assembly approved two outlandish companion bills, H-8143A and S 3035 as amended. In direct contrast to the principles that animated the founding of our state, these bills establish a government commission with the blatantly inappropriate and unconstitutional role of deciding for religious faiths which symbols of theirs are religious and which ones aren’t. As a long-time and staunch supporter of separation of church and state, Governor Chafee should veto this ill- advised legislation.

The bills were prompted by the on-going controversy surrounding a town-maintained Latin cross in front of a Woonsocket fire station. But whatever one’s views of that monument’s constitutional validity, this legislation crosses a line that the First Amendment cannot tolerate. It not only extensively entangles government in religious matters, it epitomizes the worst fears of the founders of the Constitution, who believed that separation of church and state was needed as much, if not more, to protect religion from the state as to protect the state from religion. This bill would allow government officials to declare that even a sacred religious symbol, icon, inscription, or statue has attained a secular value. Thus, government could attack religion in the guise of protecting it, by degrading, minimizing and politicizing the sacred nature of religious symbols in order to “protect” them from those advocating separation of church and state. No government commission should be permitted to decree that a religious symbol no longer has a religious meaning or that it has become predominantly secular.

Further, rather than resolve disputes over government sponsorship of religious symbols, the establishment of a commission like this will only magnify them and politicize religion to an extremely uncomfortable degree. It is ironic that those who claim a desire to protect religion would promote a bill that essentially gives a state commission the power to strip religious symbols of their sectarian meaning.

Passage of this bill is even more ironic when one considers the attacks that Governor Chafee was subjected to from the right last December when, in line with his Republican predecessor, he referred to the State House “holiday tree” instead of calling it a Christmas tree. Yet many of those same people have rallied around a bill that now establishes a government commission whose stated purpose is to declare religious symbols secular! We are hopeful that Governor Chafee will see this legislation for the politically mischievous and constitutionally problematic bill it is and give it a well-deserved veto.

Cross Our Hearts: Rhode Island and Organized Religion


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

What does it mean to be a Christian? What does it mean to be an American? What does it mean to be a Rhode Islander?

Over the next few weeks I’m going to pen a series of reflections on the many hybrid religious and political battles our little state has faced over this passing year. It has been quite the year or so, hasn’t it? We’ve repeatedly generated national headlines. We’ve had holiday trees, prayer banners, marriage equality, veteran’s memorials, contraception controversy, and more. What’s a good Rhode Islander to do? What do we know about the intersection of politics and faith? What does our unique Rhode Island history tell us about religious freedom? Our rights to assembly? Our responsibilities? What are the alternatives to the current discourse?

I will write this series in as many parts as it takes to express these deep concerns. Hopefully, you’ll follow along, be you Christian, atheist, left or right. If you want to contribute directly within the post, start now! Email OmbudsRI@gmail.com with contributions… OR, of course, you could always wait and comment in the comments! Seeing how it was just the National Day of Prayer, I feel its apt to ask you folks to pray for me (or not, your call!)

Regards,

Ombuds

 

 

 

Who’s the Knucklehead in Woonsocket Cross Flap?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

While reasonable people can disagree about whether a religious symbol belongs on a war memorial on public property, most would agree that politicians should not call their constituents knuckleheads. Woonsocket Mayor Leo Fontaine seems to be the outlier here though.

Earlier this week he levied that insult at Freedom From Religion Foundation, an atheist group from Wisconsin, that is challenging the city’s war memorial at the fire house because it features a Christian cross. Yesterday, when I asked him about it, he extended the smack down to the Woonsocket resident who brought the issue to their attention.

“I said that they were so…” Fontaine said, not quite finishing the sentence, when I asked him if he thought residents who agree that the cross violates the separation of church and state clause of the Constitution are also knuckleheads. “For them to go forward surreptitiously to try to file a complaint over a monument that has been there for over 90 years yeah my belief is that there is a better avenue to try to resolve their differences.”

On the other hand, Annie Laurie Gaylor, the co-president of Freedom From Religion, seems to think it’s somewhat knuckle-headed for a mayor to not see merit in her complaint.

“It’s like saying the Founding Fathers are knuckleheads because they created a secular government,” she told The Associated Press.

Not surprisingly, Fontaine doesn’t see it this way. “There is core foundation that this country was founded on our judeo-christian values.”

He’s wrong actually. While our founding fathers may have held judeo-christian values, those are not the values they based our democracy on. In fact, in their infinite wisdom, they made certain to keep their private beliefs separate and distinct from the kind of government they created. To confuse the two is, well, knuckle-headed.