Many Roman Catholics look to those who hold exalted positions within the hierarchy of the church for guidance on moral issues, but if polls on the behavior of Catholics in their personal lives regarding such issues as birth control and marriage equality are any indication, most Catholics find their morality elsewhere.
Still, this does not stop some high ranking prelates, such as Bishop Thomas Tobin of the Diocese of Providence, from publicly pontificating on issues of concern to the church and using his not inconsiderable political power to influence the General Assembly to hue closely to Catholic ideals. As reported on RI Future, “The President, the entire congressional delegation, the governor and the House all would support marriage equality in Rhode Island. But ‘probably two handfuls’ of Catholic state senators still stand in the way.” Unfortunately, those two handfuls of Catholic senators give the impression of answering to Bishop Tobin first, and their constituents and the Constitution of the United States second.
Tobin is unafraid to take strong stands to advance the political agenda of his church in a very public way. In 2009 the bishop famously denied Rhode Island Congressman Patrick Kennedy the sacrament of communion because Kennedy supported a woman’s right to choose in matters of abortion and family planning.
Speaking on Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly show in December of 2009, Tobin said:
I think the Church has every right and indeed the obligation to be at the table in these important questions of public policy and certainly the bishops have been for a long time now involved in the question [of] health care and the legislation that’s been developing and lots of other issues too and as I’ve often said, if the church, not just the Catholic church, but the religious community, if we don’t bring these values, this spiritual vision to these discussions, who else will do that?
O’Reilly, to his credit, pushed back against Tobin somewhat, asking why he would deny legislators sacraments in the case of supporting abortion rights but not in the case of a politician supporting capital punishment. Tobin differentiated between abortion and capitol punishment:
Abortion we believe is intrinsically wrong, it’s always wrong. There are no circumstances under which abortion can be justified… the church has been very clear and very consistent about that. However the church has also taught pretty consistently the death penalty, while it is not necessary and probably immoral in our time, at least in theory there may be circumstances that allows the death penalty to be a moral option.
To a non-Catholic Tobin’s distinction may seem arbitrary or overly legalistic, but the bishop, when speaking on matters of Catholic theology and doctrine should be taken at his word. Tobin clearly intends to ground his public comments on political issues in morality as interpreted by the Catholic Church. He said as much recently on the May 15, 2012 Buddy Cianci Show. Talking about marriage equality, Tobin said:
We don’t want to fight with [proponents of same-sex marriage] but we do have the right and I think the duty to comment on these issues and the pieces of legislation we think are objectionable and we’ll try to do that but we’ll try to do that respectfully.
Odd then, that even given the distinction he makes between between abortion and capital punishment, Tobin would be more concerned with opposing marriage equality and standing up for such seemingly trivial matters as the prayer banner in Cranston or the cross in Woonsocket than in standing up against capital punishment. These other issues are not life or death propositions, though certainly the quality of life would be improved immeasurably for many in our state by the passage of a marriage equality bill.
Clarifying his position on the death penalty through the lens of the Pleau case, Tobin explains why he does not feel qualified to speak out on this issue on the May 10, 2012 John DePetro Show:
The position of the church on capital punishment is rather clear, that we do do not think that the use of capital punishment in necessary or appropriate in our culture and in our society today. I’ve intentionally stayed away from this particular issue because it gets quickly involved in constitutional issues and state’s rights issues and federal law and local law that I’m really not qualified to talk about. So while in principle I would support the rejection of the use of capital punishment I’ve intentionally stayed away from this particular [case] because it does get rather involved in technical legal issues that I’m not at all qualified to address.
Elaborating further, if a bit repetitively, Tobin adds:
…there are some technical legal questions involved and again that’s why I’ve deliberately tried to stay out of that issue because it’s well beyond my competence to try and say where the Federal law begins and where the state law begins and the responsibilities of the federal government and governor. While [Catholics] certainly reject the use of capital punishment in our culture and our society today because it is, again, the taking of a human life, we don’t think it’s necessary. This is a very complex issue that involves law and the Constitution on the one hand, but very deep and personal and heartfelt emotions on the other and it’s enormously difficult to balance the two.
So with this deft bit of verbal lawyering Tobin divorces himself from having to speak out on the issue of capital punishment because he is not a lawyer. This makes sense, in a way, because Tobin is a theologian, not a lawyer, and should optimally only be engaged in theological pursuits and providing moral guidance for the Catholics in his church. But how do we square Tobin’s reluctance with his earlier assertion that he and his church “…have the right and I think the duty to comment on these issues and the pieces of legislation we think are objectionable…”
Tobin can certainly sound lawyerly when he wants to. Speaking about the Cross in Woonsocket now at the center of a church/state separation debate, Tobin said:
It certainly has nothing to do with the separation of church and state, this is not the establishment of a denomination, it’s not the establishment of a particular church or the recognizing of a church by the state, this is a cultural symbol…
One might be led to believe that the Woonsocket Cross is not “a very complex issue that involves law and the Constitution” that Tobin is “not at all qualified to address” but is instead a simple moral issue that the bishop feels well qualified to speak out on. On this issue and others, Tobin is not prepared to claim legal ignorance but instead speaks out forcefully.
On the May 10th DePetro Show Tobin decried President Obama’s recent declaration that his position has evolved and that he now personally supports marriage equality. Tobin said:
It’s a very, very strange evolution. The man has no real moral foundation, moral compass. This is clearly politically driven… It’s unfortunate that the leader of our nation doesn’t have a stronger moral compass to direct him… and you know, some of the other politicians who have chimed in on this I think have the same lack of moral foundation, whether you talk about President Obama or Vice President Biden or the Senators, Whitehouse and Reed or the Congressmen Langevin and Cicilline, none of them have a strong moral foundation or compass, there’s not a single profile in courage among the lot.
Speaking of Reed, and the rest of the Rhode Island delegation, Tobin added:
I think the whole group … are driven by the Democratic agenda.
and
In many of these cases, for some of these politicians it’s more important for them to be a Democrat than a Catholic and in many cases they’ve abandoned the basic teaching of the church.
Let’s go back to Tobin’s attack on Congressman Kennedy, a Democrat. Let’s go back to the silly issue over the Christmas Tree, or Holiday Tree, as Governor Chafee’s office called it. Even though plenty of evidence was produced to show that former Governor Carcieri, a Republican, had also referred to the tree in the Rhode Island State House as a Holiday Tree on more than one occasion, Tobin never had an issue with the designation until Governor Chafee took office. Chafee, an independent who strongly favors marriage equality, is disliked by Bishop Tobin whereas Carcieri found in Tobin a staunch supporter.
This is likely why Tobin will not take a strong stance on the Pleau case. Governor Chafee is making a very strong, moral case that Rhode Island’s long and historic opposition to the death penalty necessitates exhausting every legal option, up to and including the Supreme Court, to prevent a Rhode Island citizen from facing the death penalty on a Federal level. Though it is a complex legal case, the morality of the death penalty is a comparatively simple moral stance to take from the point of view of a Roman Catholic, but Tobin balks. Though the bishop would, in theory, oppose the death penalty on Catholic theological grounds, he seems to not want to do anything that might make it appear that he is supporting the governor, a political enemy.
It should surprise no one that Bishop Tobin’s political bent is not progressive or liberal. It is right-wing and authoritarian in the worst way. He is anti-gay rights, anti-women’s rights, and even opposed to the constitutional separation of church and state. Tobin is a theocrat. Even the most progressive stance he espouses, that the death penalty is at least in theory morally wrong is shrouded in caveats:
…we do do not think that the use of capital punishment is necessary or appropriate in our culture and in our society today.
Note that Tobin qualifies that statement with the word, “today.” The death penalty was appropriate in the past (perhaps when the Catholic Church had nearly unlimited political power) and may one day be morally correct in the future (in that nightmare world where the Catholic Church has massive political power once more.) It is only today, when the moral certainty of the Catholic church is marginalized by secular society, that capital punishment is considered wrong by Tobin.
Tobin’s reactionary politics may be abhorrent to progressives and humanists, but in truth little more can be expected from a man so deeply vested in the ancient theocratic mindset prevalent in today’s Catholic Church. I would venture that Tobin’s tenure as Bishop has been devastating to Rhode Island Catholics especially since under his tenure the percentage of Catholics in the state has dropped to 44% according to a study by the Association of Statisticians of American religious Bodies. Indeed, Rhode Island can no longer claim to be the most Catholic state in the United States, that distinction now belongs to Massachusetts.
Worse than his politics is Tobin’s style of public discourse. On the marriage equality debate, Tobin said:
…let me emphasize [when] we [the Roman Catholic Church] participate in these public debates it’s never intended to be insulting or personally offensive [to people of] same-sex orientation. They are children of God and certainly our brothers and sisters in the community.
Apparently the insulting and personally offensive comments are reserved for those working to preserve the reproductive rights of women. On the Providence Diocese website RICatholic.com, The American Civil Liberties Union, Planned Parenthood, Humanists of Rhode Island, Rhode Island Medical Society, Brown Medical Students for Choice and Catholics for Choice were referred to as “radical promoters of death” for speaking out against laws that seek to limit a woman’s right to access birth control, including abortion.
Tobin equates atheism with a lack of morality, though even the most conservative Catholic theologians understand that people can be moral without a belief in God. Tobin is quick to make gross, sweeping characterizations about non-believers. Speaking on the April 24th John DePetro Show about the cross in Woonsocket, Tobin makes the following, almost paranoid statement:
Do we want a state and a nation completely free of any expressions of faith or references to God or moral values or spiritual values order we want a state and a nation where these things are part of our life and part of our culture. I think the church, the religious community, the faith community has so much to contribute to our citizens, to our individuals but to our common life together that’s the kind of nation state we have had historically, but unfortunately these other forces of secularism and atheism are encroaching upon us. You know the governor has that famous quote he said that “the world is changing” well I hope it’s not changing that much because then we’re going to be completely separated from God and we’ll be living truly in an atheistic culture and society and i don’t think most of our people want that.
Tobin fears living “in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute—where no Catholic prelate would tell the President (should he be Catholic) how to act, and no Protestant minister would tell his parishioners for whom to vote—where no church or church school is granted any public funds or political preference—and where no man is denied public office merely because his religion differs from the President who might appoint him or the people who might elect him.” Tobin fears this because in this America he would just be just another priest, ministering to his flock, watching his religion become ever more redundant in a world that has left ancient and medieval beliefs behind. By the way, the above quote is from John F. Kennedy in his address to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association from September 12, 1960.
Tobin seems well acquainted with this former president. Not only is former Congressman Patrick Kennedy JFK’s nephew, Tobin obliquely referenced the first and so far only Catholic president when speaking of the Congressional delegation from Rhode Island, saying, “there’s not a single profile in courage among the lot.” Profiles in Courage is a 1955 Pulitzer Prize winning book by JFK that “describes acts of bravery and integrity by eight United States Senators throughout the Senate’s history.” Tobin knows the popularity of JFK among his Catholic constituency, and his use of the presidents book title to disparage our present crop of senators and congressmen is particularly appalling given Kennedy’s expressed views on church/state separation.
Roger Williams, the founder of Rhode Island, famously said, “…when one mixes religion and politics, one gets politics” and that’s something that Bishop Tobin should pay more attention to. The more involved the Catholic Church gets involved in politics the less it becomes a church and the more it becomes just another conservative political lobby. Mythological belief systems may work to undergird a system of personal morality for some people but actively working to enforce those personal values on everyone in our secular society is theocratic, anti-Democratic and anti-American.
Bishop Thomas Tobin frocks himself in the garments of moral authority and spiritual leadership but his conservative politicking on social issues reveal him as a naked hypocrite. When it comes to morality and ethics, the Bishop has no clothes.
I think Tobin is disgusting but as a non-Catholic it is has been very hard to criticize the hierarchy even though they are so involved with, and influential in, public policy debates. But I will add the rot starts not with Bishop Tobin, but in the Vatican, where previous popes protected pedophile-protecting Cardinal Law, where they presided over worldwide child abuse, where they led a campaing against condoms that resulted in a worse spread of AIDS, and the current pope, like Tobin, has shown much more interest in trying to force ridiculous Catholic sexual views on the world rather than showing any interest in social justice aspects of Catholic thought.
As I’ve heard, Catholic schoolgirls for whom the indoctrination doesn’t take, say if the pope could get pregnant abortion would be a sacrament. And does anyone else remember the US Secretary of Agriculture say in this contact – if he doesn’t play the game he cannot mae the rules. Unimaginable nowadays.
Seriously, what is a bishop but a politician? When we joke that when every US Senator looks in the mirror and sees a president; the same is true for a bishop that looks in the mirror, except instead of a president, they see a cardinal. The truly intellectual and genuinely moral members of the Catholic priesthood routinely get overlooked for promotion in favor of the ideologues and secret-keepers. It’s disgusting.
As a former church going Catholic, I have to agree that this church has become nothing but another disgusting political party. I fought off the thoughts of hypocrisy for years and finally could not take it anymore. How can you politically stand behind an organization that protects pedophiles and promotes homosexuality from within its ranks? Instead of using their enormously full coffers to feed and clothe the poor (as they tell us we should do), they have used it to pay off anyone who claims to have been “touched” by one of their priests. This is basically another way to push sexual abuse allegations down and out of the media. They have been hoarding wealth for years and shamelessly continue to beg for more money every week. This is what eventually drove me away…
On the abortion vs. capital punishment issue… come on, it’s the same thing; the taking a of a human life. If you don’t believe that a fetus is a human life, then why do you have funerals for stillborns? Morally, it’s the same act regardless of the circumstance. There can’t be any “in some cases it’s moral to take a life” It’s either all or nothing. This is nothing but the typical wishy-washy-ness of a political party trying to gain favor with it’s constituents and pushing it’s political agenda.
I’d be interested in hearing what the Vatican and the bishop have to say about paying taxes. I mean it’s not like they don’t use any public services….
You’re portrayal of the Catholic Church as the only road block to same sex marriage is presumptuous at best. I’m no Catholic and don’t agree with them much but they are citizens like any other and are entitled to their positions. Secondly, you’re trying pile on by misrepresenting his position on the prayer banner. You’re blaming him for the votes of politicians who represent constituencies. This isn’t about the Church. It’s about politics and he’s just another voice. If you have a problem with hypocrisy, how about Democrats? The party of unions and living wages but also the party of illegal immigration and theft of jobs. The party of raising taxes on the rich until they’re in power. Now that’s some serious hypocrisy.
Steve and all:
This is really a well-researched article. Thank you for taking the time to do the detail work.
Duane
OTC
On the marriage equality debate, Tobin said:
And yet, when civil unions were approved, part of his statement in response said, “Can there be any doubt that Almighty God will, in His own time and way, pass judgment upon our state, its leaders and citizens, for abandoning His commands and embracing public immorality?”
So, God will punish Rhode Island for passing civil unions? I’d say that is more than a little insulting and personally offensive.
Thanks for your post. You did a good job pointing out his double-talk.
Tobin is real throw-back to the 1930′s era Catholic Church in Spain when……….
“In quashing democracy and timid agricultural reform, and in restoring the traditional hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church, the army, big landowners and an authoritarian state, the Spanish version of fascism was very much a fundamentalist movement. And like so many political and religious fundamentalisms, it had a particular ferocity toward women. Franco’s troops practiced gang rape to frighten newly captured towns into submission, and until media-savvy superiors silenced them, his officers even boasted about this to American and British correspondents. Tens of thousands of women had their heads shaved and were force-fed castor oil (a powerful laxative), then jeered as they were paraded through the streets soiling themselves. Many had their breasts branded with the Falangist symbol of yoke and arrows. In Toledo, a United Press correspondent reported, Franco’s soldiers shot more than 20 pregnant women from a maternity hospital. Much larger all-female groups were executed elsewhere. Troops marched through one town waving rifles adorned with the underwear of women they had raped and murdered. “It is necessary to spread terror,” one of Franco’s senior generals declared. “We have to create the impression of mastery, eliminating without scruples or hesitation all those who do not think as we do.””
www.nytimes.com/2012/05/13/books/review/the-spanish-holocaust-by-paul-preston.html?pagewanted=all
Well said Dog Diesel, Steve Ahlquist is anti Tobin and Anti Catholic Church all together. Like you said double standards.
On another note also mentioned in this article as far as I’m concerned the Pleau case should be handed to the feds and let the feds handle him. Death penalty or not – we keep defending the criminals and this is no different than the church defending the priests and people that were charged with child molestation. I can tell you that I’m surprised that no one in the Pleau family hasn’t taken the law into their own hands.
DogDiesel, I agree with you that they (the bishop) “are entitle to their positions”, but when you are the head of the diocese your position has far more weight than the average person. When the bishop denied Patrick Kennedy taking communion he was doing far more than expressing his opinion. He was using his authority in the church to either punish Kennedy or coerce him into falling in line. Should we have any doubt that this was also intended as a message to other politicians. And if you have any doubt that this kind of pressure has influence in the state house talk to a few legislators, and I think it will become clear.
“He was using his authority in the church to either punish Kennedy or coerce him into falling in line.”
You say that like its a bad thing! I think the church is wrong on gay marriage an a number of other issues, but no one is forcing Kennedy or any other person to associate themselves with the Catholic Church. Much like any other organization, if you want to identify as a Catholic (an enjoy their support) you need to play by their rules.
Fine by me. But if you think the church is involved in lobbying they should be paying their taxes like any other lobbyist.
I think it is a bit of a stretch to suggest that a church has to provide communion to an elected official in order to comply with lobbying laws, and denying a sacrament is a form of lobbying. But even if that were the case, I am sure I don’t have to tell you that all 501(c)(3) organizations, not just churches) are allowed to engage in limited lobbying activities without running afoul of tax laws – provided lobbying is not a substantial part of the organizations activities.
tlamora,
You’re inadvertently using the church as an excuse for politicians’ poor behavior. Like Sully said, you either identify with the church or you don’t. It’s your choice.
Well done, Steve. I am using your article in an review of mine for my History of RI class at URI. The book is Ballots and Bibles: ethnic politics and the Catholic Church in Providence by Evelyn Savidge Sterne, who also teaches at URI.
Thank you Steve, for this. The important point you make is that Tobin is a hypocrite and opportunist - only standing strong on the issues he wants to, not on all the teachings of the Church.
“Much like any other organization, if you want to identify as a Catholic (an enjoy their support) you need to play by their rules.” That’s the concern people had when John Kennedy ran for president. That the Catholic church would force him to play by their rules. It seemed far fetched at the time, not so far fetched today.
I think its less likely today than it was in the 60′s. I think the Church’s influence has decreased, not increased since then. Maybe I am naive, but I am not all that concerned about a church controlling a Manchurian Candidate.
I understand that the position of butler is open at the Vatican.
This is made for tv, a “situation tragedy” (thanks, Max,) if you will.
The pope is a former Hitler Youth with a self-confessed passion for nice cars and bling. THe angels want to wear his red shoes.
Now, we see that one of his boys got tired of holding the umbrella.
The Vatican is a money laundry and entire church congregations are being ousted so that Rome can pay its legal bills to victims.
Please, Bishop Tobin, lecture us further on morality– and give us a full, unvarnished report on the above-mentioned mess.
There’s a Fox contract in here someplace– as a reality show or as cultural defense. Sean, sharpen your pencils and call the Bishop.