Andrew Winters and institutional bullying at URI


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

winters“Midnight Tonight: Students Protest LGBT Campus Safety at University of Rhode Island.” This was the headline on a Campus Pride blog of September 22, 2010, announcing a round-the-clock occupation of the URI library “to ensure the safety and inclusion of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) students, faculty and staff.”

When the dust had settled in early 2011, students awarded their adviser, Andrew Winters, a “Certificate of Service and Admirable Citizenship,” honoring him as their advocate.

Within weeks, Andrew, at the time assistant to the VP for student affairs, received a blistering letter of reprimand. It consisted of unsubstantiated accusations and personal insults, and ended with a demand for his silence and the following threat: “If you do not comply with the above expectations […] you will face disciplinary procedure up to and including termination.”

Several weeks later, Andrew went on administrative leave; in June he succumbed to the pressure and left. Ever since, university officials have refused to comment other than stating to the press that he “retired,” and that: “Everyone was in agreement around the terms. He was not forced to retire.”

In fact, Andrew was bullied and coerced into a separation agreement that he signed under duress. Since then, also Joe Santiago, his former assistant, was “let go” from his position at the University without written notice or explanation.

Much of this, and another University of Rhode Island case of bullying has been on the news lately. See the Hummel Reports:

Also see this report in Unfiltered Lens, a student newspaper.

After what university administrators spun as retirement, Andrew has spent most of his time trying to correct these systemic problems with their countless victims of which he is one.

In spite of increasing awareness of the need for corrective action, elected officials and the Board of Education have, as is their pattern, neglected their responsibility. In Andrew’s case, inaction has been justified by: “He should take his case to court and have the separation agreement reversed.” But “liberty and justice for all” too often is an illusion for those who cannot act without the terror of losing their physical, emotional and economic health.

The root cause of the systemic failure at the University is that over the last 50 years state funding has dropped from 60% in the 1960s to a current low of less than 10%. As a consequence, university administrators have become public relations representatives whose main concern is financial rather than academic strength.

In the resulting environment of a privatized, bottom-line driven institution advocates for victims of bigotry, discrimination or sexual assault will be shot as messengers who threaten the “product brand.”

Silence and coverup also affect the public as this corporatized environment allows officials to enter into separation agreements with clauses such as this:

The University will not contest or object to Mr. Winters’ eligibility to collect and receive unemployment benefits or compensation.

As mentioned, Andrew Winters was coerced into this agreement. He would not have been entitled to unemployment compensation, had he retired voluntarily, as the University claims. He lost his job, and was qualified to collect, after he informed Department of Labor officials of the circumstances of his departure.

What excuse does the University have for doling out unemployment benefits and compensation via a ploy that cannot see light of day”

The regular citizen recognizes this for what it is: a conspiracy to defraud the People of Rhode Island. As in the case of 38 Studios, complicit officials leave it to the public to foot the bill for their shady deals.

The Rhode Island Legislature may have begun to address this misappropriation in the submission of House Resolution 2014 H 7669 “Creating a special legislative commission to investigate issues of fairness in the hiring and retention of certain faculty members and employees of the University of Rhode Island.”

Surely it is long past time to restore ethics and transparency to higher education and to public institutions in Rhode Island, and long past time to correct the injustice done to Andrew Winters, Joe Santiago and the People of Rhode Island.

We, the People, shall not rest until we have eradicated misappropriation, bullying, and suppression. We shall not rest until we have established a system of collaboration, transparency and justice for all.

Think big, URI. Guy McPherson does.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Fossil Free Rhode Island received a reply denying our request that URI divest from fossil fuels on March 14. Recent reports warn of stranded carbon assets and the looming popping of the carbon bubble. Even so, the URI Foundation continues to invest in wrecking the climate, and calls it “Building for the Future.” Now, that requires really Big Thinking!
McPherson20140412-color
Meanwhile, Fossil Free RI continues the climate conversation with a visit from author, public speaker, and “latter-day gadfly,” Guy McPherson, Professor Emeritus of the University of Arizona, who will speak on climate chaos and humanity’s reaction to it:

  • What does climate change actually mean for us as human beings? Can we still live compassionate, exceptional lives even if the odds are stacked against us?

Guy McPherson, who thinks human extinction will begin around 2030, is a knowledgeable, amusing and challenging speaker. This is a chance to hear about instabilities too hard to capture in climate models, topics that many “grown-ups” consider “too scary for the kids.”

McPherson’s view is more dire than that of the majority of climate scientists, but his arguments deserve our serious attention. First of all, there is the One Percent Doctrine which states that

If there’s a 1% chance […], we have to treat it as a certainty in terms of our response. It’s not about our analysis […] It’s about our response.

If this infamous doctrine provides cover for the 1% and its perpetual wars, should it not apply with a vengeance to climate change and the risk of ecocide it poses?

Guy McPherson’s talk will provide the vital counterbalance to the politically motivated censorship imposed upon the IPCC report:

The poorest people in the world, who have had virtually nothing to do with causing global warming, will be high on the list of victims as climatic disruptions intensify, the report said. It cited a World Bank estimate that poor countries need as much as $100 billion a year to try to offset the effects of climate change; they are now getting, at best, a few billion dollars a year in such aid from rich countries.

The $100 billion figure, though included in the 2,500-page main report, was removed from a 48-page executive summary to be read by the world’s top political leaders. It was among the most significant changes made as the summary underwent final review during an editing session of several days in Yokohama.

If you can make it, please join the Facebook event and invite your friends.

This event (no charge — donations accepted) is sponsored by Fossil Free Rhode Island: action for climate justice, urging public institutions that divestment from fossil fuels is the only moral choice.

Resiliency in Rhode Island: a panel discussion on climate change


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

URIPanelPosterAs part of Fossil Free Rhode Island’s ongoing fossil fuel divestment campaigns, the organization is sponsoring a panel discussion on climate change organized by the Rhode Island Climate Coalition (RISCC).

WHAT: Resiliency In Rhode Island: a panel discussion on climate change
WHEN: March 19, 2014, 7pm
WHERE: Lippitt Hall, Room 402, URI Kingston, RI 02881

From rising seas to severe storms such as Hurricane Sandy and Winter Storm Nemo to record heat waves, floods, and droughts, the challenges posed by climate change are intensifying around the world, the US, and in Rhode Island with its 420 mile shoreline … while it lasts.

Rhode Island is already experiencing the effects. From big storms to urban heat, the challenges posed by climate change are on the rise.

Forum speakers will outline the challenges climate change poses for communities and governance. There will be a discussion about how Rhode Island can tap its creative capacity and unique assets to respond to climate change in a way that will improve the lives of all its citizens.

The event presents an exciting opportunity for the community to get involved in the conversation and in new climate initiatives.

Speakers at the Climate Forum will include:

  • Margiana Petersen-Rockney — Rosasharn Farm, Young Farmer’s Network
  • Julian Rodriguez-Drix — Environmental Justice League
  • Jim Bruckshaw — OSHA Consultant from Matunuck
  • Judith Swift — URI Coastal Institute
  • ECO Youth organizers such as Abe Vargas, Kendra Monzon, and Juliana Rodriguez

In June of 2013, Fossil Free Rhode Island requested that the URI Foundation divest from fossil fuels. In a letter received today, this request was turned down. The URI Foundation expressed its commitment to honor the intent of its donors by investing responsibly, implying that divestment was at odds with this.

Clearly, whatever destroys Earth cannot possibly be a responsible investment. This obviously is a view shared by those alumni who told me in recent days that they plan to form an alternative fund in which deposits can be held until the URI decides to divest. This latest development will certainly be part of the panel discussion.

The event is sponsored by:

  • Rhode Island Student Climate Coalition, a statewide alliance of students and youth working for a clean, safe, and just future for all
  • Fossil Free Rhode Island, taking action for climate justice, urging public institutions to divest from fossil fuels as the only moral choice
  • URI Multicultural Center, dedicated to the development —by means of social justice, change and empowerment — of a campus united across culture, identity, and discipline.

If self-congratulation could save the Earth


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Yesterday, March 12, 2014, the sponsors of Senate Bill 2690 held a hearing on their bill which has the following summary:

An Act Relating To Public Utilities And Carriers – The Distributed Generation Growth Program (would Create A Tariff-based Renewable Energy Distributed Generation Financing Program.)

The discussion left me in the state of bewilderment I anticipated. Self-congratulation and lots of words, but a near-total absence of substance.  Why this frustration, you might wonder. Let me explain.

Windmills-Kinderdijk-Netherlands

Here is a quote from the report of the hearing in the Providence Journal:

They [renewable energy developers and environmental advocates] said that proposed legislation to extend the life of what was originally created as a pilot program and increase its size would not only boost the state’s economy by creating clean energy jobs but would also help the environment by reducing the carbon emissions that contribute to climate change.

“Reducing the carbon emissions!”  That should be good news for me and my friends of Fossil Free RI, who were well represented among the those who testified. Good news? Well, maybe. Let me mention that my testimony was in line with the views of  AFSC-SENE.  Of course, I am really shocked, shocked, shocked that none of my profound thoughts made into the ProJo report.  Here is the testimony I submitted for the record:

The DG bill is for a program to provide 160MW nameplate capacity over five years. What does this mean?

Power consumption per capita in the US is 1.5kW.  That is 1.5 GW for RI.

This five-year program will replace nominally 10% of RI Electric electric power: 2% per year.

The actual power is about 20% of nameplate power. That gets us to 0.4% per year.

Take into account that RI per capita power use is 60% of the national average and that electric power makes up for about 40% of our energy consumption.

Conclusion: the DG program will make a yearly change of 0.3% in our power consumption.

To prevent catastrophic climate change, we have to cut our carbon dioxide emissions by about 10% per year. In other words, to do what needs to be done, this program should be expanded by a factor of roughly 30; that might be “only” 20, if the “20% of nameplate power” is too conservative.

If the fossil fuel industry were to put in place a decoy program to guarantee their continued business as usual, it might look like this program.

This bill needs the following amendments:

  • A provision that power generation as a public utility be publicly owned and cooperatively operated.  The People of Rhode Island are fed up depending for power on National Grid, a corporation headquartered in the United Kingdom.
  • There will have to be:
    • occupational safety protections for the workers doing e.g. roof top installation and maintenance and
    • occupational injury benefits and retirement programs

By all means, please amend and adopt this bill, as long as you realize that it dramatically fails to accomplish what the physics of climate change demands.

This bill was probably formulated by people who may know exactly what they are doing. Whether that is good or bad remains to be seen, but the decisions are made by people who seem totally oblivious how many injuries and fatalities their plans may make and what   to do about these consequences. Nor did they seem to know whether they are talking about a 0.1% 1%, or 10% fractional solution of our share of the climate change problem.

Can anyone expect this process to produce rational decisions?  Of course not, all we’ll get is just more bloody capitalism!  Is it a surprise that the People have no confidence in their representatives and increasingly tune out of the fact-free reporting perpetrated by the corporate media complex?

Fossil Free RI puts Rhode Island climate bill in perspective


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Cumulative 1751-2012 emissions: USA with it 5% of the world population is responsible for 25% of the CO_2 emissions

Representative Art Handy, Chairman of the House Environment and Natural Resources Committee, hosted an informational briefing on Tuesday, February 25, in the RI State House Members  Lounge.  He will introduce a climate bill during this legislative session.

Fossil Free Rhode Island (FFRI) was available to present it concerns regarding the draft climate bill. Climate research shows that there is a limit to the amount of carbon-dioxide the atmosphere can absorb without causing a climate catastrophe.[1]  What counts is the cumulative total since the beginning of the industrial revolution; when and where do not matter. Generations inhabiting Earth have to live within a fixed carbon-dioxide budget.

Cumulative 1751-2012 emissions: USA with it 5% of the world population is responsible for 25% of the CO_2 emissions
Cumulative 1751-2012 emissions: USA with it 5% of the world population is responsible for 25% of the CO_2 emissions

Accordingly, a climate bill must contain a limit on emissions and a mechanism to check its observance. The draft climate bill overshoots humanity’s budget by about 25% when scaled to the level of the globe, assuming that people are created equally and live accordingly.

The science is problematic, but global fairness is an issue too. The industrialized nations, mostly in the global north, have vastly over-spent their fair share of the carbon-dioxide budget. We have created the global climate problem and without the admission that we are “carbon debtor” nations a way out of the global climate change problem will remain elusive. The massive walkout at the UN climate talks COP19 in Warsaw in November of 2013 is a reminder of this reality.

There is a third problem.  As some nations reduce their use of fossil fuels, the resulting surplus will be exported to be burned elsewhere.  Indeed, according to the Quarterly Coal Report of US Energy Information Administration coal exports have quadrupled over the last five years. To reverse this, carbon debtor nations must mount a global program to develop and implement carbon-free technologies and carry the burden that they have laid on the world.

This reality exposes as fraudulent major parts of the White House Climate Action Plan which touts natural gas as a “bridge fuel.”  With its life cycle emission likely to exceed that of coal, and with its extraction that poisons the local communities natural gas is a bridge to nowhere. See Howarth et al. in Atmospheric Methane.

Responding to economic pressure to export fossil fuels, the White House aims for fast-track approval of the construction of a facility at Cove Point on Chesapeake Bay to liquefy gas extracted in Appalachia.  See A Big Fracking Lie.

Here in the North-East, there is the Algonquin Gas Transmission Pipeline expansion project.  Spectra Energy’s proposed expansion of this pipeline with a compressor station in Burrilville would, as FFRI’s Nick Katkevich of Providence, RI, said: “expose residents to increased risk of headaches, dizziness, respiratory and cardiovascular problems, and cancer, as well as a greater risk of explosions.” Nick stressed that

kicking our oil, coal and gas addiction isn’t just about global warming, it’s also about protecting our communities from the immediate dangers of extracting, transporting and burning fossil fuels.

Among the latest maneuvers that jeopardize environmental safeguards are the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and Transatlantic Free Trade Area (TAFTA) negotiations.  The realization of such treaties, designed to pamper too-big-to-fail corporations, will compound an already dangerous economic and legal environment.

With the window dressing stripped away, the administration’s business-as-usual approach is painfully obvious.  The State Department’s release of the Keystone XL environmental impact statement is just one dramatic example. As FFRI’s Lisa Petrie of Carolina, RI, put it:

The Keystone XL pipeline will poison our water, impose on indigenous rights and even fails The White House’s own climate test. The Keystone XL Pipeline must be rejected!

Wakefield Vigil Against Keystone XL -- February 24, 2014
Wakefield Vigil Against Keystone XL — February 24, 2014, (Photo by Robert Malin.)

While Fossil Free RI appreciates Rep. Handy’s leadership in drafting a bill that is a huge step forward, we stress that it is of essence that a climate bill articulate a global perspective based on morality, economics, and science, the essential elements of the solution of the global climate change problem.  Compromise is not an option and triangulation may provide a sense of accomplishment but it will not suspend the laws of physics.

[1] A longer version of the paper Assessing “Dangerous Climate Change”: Required Reduction of Carbon Emissions to Protect Young People, Future Generations and Nature by Hansen et al. is available here.

No safety when people are disposable commodities


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

One of the events organized at URI last week was a panel discussion on Alternative Strategies for Maintaining a Safe Campus. Here is an updated informal version of the notes I prepared for the occasion.

Käthe Kollwitz: PTSD
Käthe Kollwitz: PTSD

Outline

  • Identify the problem: how does one create a safe campus in a society that idolizes violence on all scales?
  • What can we do about it?

Violence

  • Societies breed the sociopaths they deserve. The following two are manifestations of the systemic violence:
    • the lone-nut on a shooting rampage
    • police departments militarized with perpetual-war surplus
  • The physical abuse we teach in military training and employ abroad in expanding our empire sets the standard for oppression we use at home.  This is what happened to non-violent protesters of Disarm Now Plowshares when they resisted our nuclear weapons of mass destruction:
    • They —nuns, priests, and a nurse— were arrested, cuffed and hooded with sand bags.
    • At the trial the marine in charge testified:

      When we secure prisoners anywhere in Iraq or Afghanistan we hood them … so we did it to them.

  • The US has the highest incarceration rate in the world
    • home of 5% of the world population and 25% of the world’s incarcerated.
    • 5% of black men; 2% of Hispanic men; less than 1% of white men are incarcerated.
    • Read Michelle Alexander’s The New Jim Crow or watch this this video. Here is a panel discussion called End Mass Incarceration; it provides the missing links required to find alternative strategies.
  • With guns as god on our side we have 30,000 gun shot fatalities per year and 70,000 non-fatal shootings. These statistics dwarf the spectacular events that feed and are caused by the corporate media complex.
  • Pro Publica had an article about the effects of violence: The PTSD Crisis that’s being ignored:
    • vicious cycle: neighborhood violence → PTSD → compromised public safety → neighborhood violence
  • These are the effects on children when they grow up in poverty and violence:
  • Pediatricians refer to this violence to which children are subjected as toxic stress. The solution of the corporate media complex assisted by the United Global Union Busters? Blame teachers for their under-performing students and call in the privatization troops!
  • Death preventable by effective health care: If we had the French health care system in US, there would be 140,000 fewer such fatalities per year.
  • The real numbers are a state secret, but a good estimate is that US national “defense” costs $4,000 per person per year. This amounts to a lifetime expenditure of more than $250,000 per person.
  • Martin Luther King in his Beyond Vietnam speech at Riverside Church onApril 4, 1967, a year before his assassination said:

    A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.

    The system we have created is what spiritual death looks like: we are all zombies now! Two atomic bombs worth of fatalities each year, but nobody notices and nobody cares because it produces no gripping pictures on the home page.

  • This is an abbreviated list with lots of victims of systemic violence, but it’s all peanuts compared to the violence of global inequality, which kills about 25,000,000 people per year. Global climate change, which barely registers in the corporate media, may cause a number of fatalities bigger by one or two orders of magnitude. How can we begin to solve that problem, if we collectively ignore statistics like these?

What can we do?

  • There is the eternal question: “How do we deal with the danger of increasing crime?”
  • A famous Dutch criminologist, referring to a newspaper notorious for its sensationalism had a simple answer: “Read a different morning newspaper.”
  • My reply 30 years later:

    Tune out of the stupefying pap served up by the corporate media complex.

  • Get used to the idea that the brain acts as if it has two parts: (fast forward to the seven minute time mark in the video)
    • System one responds to pictures and anecdotes; it can barely count or reason and is easily mislead, but it’s fast and can save us from immediate danger.
    • System two can think systematically and critically; it can understand statistics, but it’s lazy, slow and painful to engage.
    • The corporate media talk to system one. Tune out and there will be fewer hysteria driven events such as the lock-down at URI last year.
    • Engage system one and you’ll realize that there is a war on the poor and people of color in America. The lone-nut shooter in a nice white, affluent neighborhood near you is responsible for only a minute fraction of the total number of victims.
  • How can an individual help solve problems of global scale? Follow Gandhi when he said: “Be the change you want to see in the world!” Maybe I’ll get to that, for now I’ll follow Martin Luther King with his:

    In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.

  • Once again, for the academic year 2013-2014 URI is in the bottom twenty of  LGBT unfriendly schools.
  • According to government statistics, the most prevalent hate crimes by far on university campuses result from bias involving race and sexual orientation. Drawing attention to their manifestations on campus is encouraged as long as it results in nice photo ops for administrators.  As soon as the message become a threat to the corporate brand image, the messenger is disappeared.
  • It happens all the time and it is what happened to my dear friend Andrew Winters at URI. First people get MLK peacemaker awards, but then something goes wrong and silence at URI sets in.  Andrew’s disappearance was covered in
    • CCRI’s Unfiltered Lens
    • The Brown Daily Herald
    • The Providence Journal
    • Options, RI’s LGBT community newsmagazine

    URI’s Good Five Cent Cigar, the Student Senate, and the Faculty Senate have all deliberately participated in the URI code of silence.  Blessed by the Board of Education and the Governor’s office, the tactic of choice remains loyalty to the corporate Think Big brand. As always, the tactic of choice is saying one thing in public, and doing the opposite behind the scenes.

    A perfect example took place when URI was featured in an article in The Chronicle of Higher Education. The university’s CEO wrote in his blog of March 9, 2011 under the heading Another Special Moment for URI:

    Many of your [sic] have heard me say that one cannot solve problems while trying to hide them, or by pretending they don’t exist.

    Sounds good until you find out that the photojournalist working on this article for The Chronicle was ordered off the URI campus.

Violence makes most of its victims one by one; the vast majority remain nameless.  The corporate media complex reports only on the spectacular outliers that produce juicy pictures.  Is it surprising that this feeds mass hysteria?

Meanwhile, capitalism keeps alive a health care system run by death panels consisting of criminally overpaid CEOs.  The system  perpetuates violence and oppression in the workplace, in the streets, in the prisons and a global scale. The alternative strategy that we are looking for has been formulated by Camus:

In such a world of conflict, a world of victims and executioners, it is the job of thinking people not to be on the side of the executioners.

Dirty Wars at URI


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Dirty Wars: The World is a Battlefield, URI, Kingston, Swan Hall, Thursday Nov. 14, 2013, 7:30 pm

The President is all fired up; cameras are rolling. Days of coaching by a talented theater director flown in from a small, elite college are paying off. The lines are delivered with poise and apparent compassion. With pregnant pauses and the cadence of her delivery, the President punctuates the gravity of her message:

Our preference is always to capture if we can, because then we can gather intelligence. But a lot of the terrorist networks that target the United States, the most dangerous ones, operate in remote regions and it’s very difficult to capture them.

Dirty Wars: The World is a Battlefield,  URI, Kingston, Swan Hall, Thursday Nov. 14, 2013, 7:30 pm
Dirty Wars: The World is a Battlefield, URI, Kingston, Swan Hall, Thursday Nov. 14, 2013, 7:30 pm

To reinforce the President’s message, White House Press Secretary, Jay Carnage, declares:

U.S. counter-terrorism operations are precise, they are lawful and they are effective.

To wrap up the media fib-fest, partisans of the In-List —bought from Google for a president’s ransom— receive a message affirming that the Unites States is a the moral leader and savior of the world. The message boosts the confidence of the In-team in their Leader. At the same time, the Out-List team receives a message that the Unites States is a the moral leader and savior of the world. It spells out that the President is weak on defense, asleep at wheel, and puts the Nation at grave risk.

Who is this President? The current one? A previous one or the next specimen? It does not matter. Political theater, designed to make slaughter look respectable, is as old as the hills, but it really thrives in today’s Google-Facebook surveillance state. Performances like this, assisted by mass media that are the envy of the world’s most vicious tyrannies, succeed phenomenally in their goal: only 11 percent of the population thinks that the use of drones should be decreased.

This Thursday (11/14/2013) the Center for Nonviolence & Peace Studies at URI will be screening Dirty Wars: The World Is a Battlefield

Dirty Wars follows investigative reporter Jeremy Scahill, author of the international bestseller Blackwater, into the hidden world of America’s covert wars, from Afghanistan to Yemen, Somalia, and beyond. With a strong cinematic style, the film blurs the boundaries of documentary and fiction storytelling. Part action film and part detective story, Dirty Wars is a gripping journey into one of the most important and under-reported stories of our time.

Jeremy Scahill is the reluctant star in this film, directed by Richard Rowley. Both risked their lives in its making, and it is not just foreign threats that they had to worry about.

The film —as does the book by the same title— chronicles the expansion of covert US wars and the security state. It focuses on the pervasive abuse of executive privilege, and features the elite military units operated by the White House and its War Lord in Chief.

Dirty Wars documents naked American exceptionalism and wholesale subversion of the Constitution. The film features the Party of Corporate America, represented by a duopoly of alternating right wings, and how it has bought into the idea that “the world is a battlefield” of undeclared wars.

Take this transcript of a conversation between Jeremy Scahill and Ron Wyden, since 2001 a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee:
Scahill: When there is a lethal operation and a high-value person is killed, the President then of course acknowledges that we kill …
Background voice: He can’t confirm that there have been any lethal operations outside of a war zone.

(Oh, oops, Wyden got drowned out, but he’ll be back soon.)

The Unitary Executive is unchecked by law or oversight. Ron Wyden has repeatedly asked the administration for its legal justification of killing of its own citizens without trial. What else can such requests produce but self-serving blather?

A major portion of the film is devoted to the life and death of Anwar al Awlaki, who may be the first American citizen to be assassinated by his own government under the guise of legality. He had not been indicted in any US court and faced no known charges. How would he have surrendered? And to whom? Also his son, a minor and an American citizen, was executed by presidential fiat without due process of law, in a flagrant violation of the Constitution.

The conversation with Wyden continues:
Wyden: It is almost as if there are two different laws in America, and the American people would be extraordinarily surprised if they could see the difference between what they believe a law says and how it has actually been interpreted in secret.
Scahill: You are not permitted to disclose that difference publicly.
Wyden: That is correct.

Is there any doubt that the presidency has become a national security dictatorship, solely guided by what it deems to be in the national interest? Farewell, checks and balances!

Kill-lists are perpetually replaced by kill-lists twice their size, and, without a doubt, blow-back is on the way. As always, the vast majority the victims are non-combatants, pregnant women and children. It makes you wonder with Ecclesiastes:

One of the children we terrorize with the drones bought with our taxes. From Robert Greenwald's Unmanned
One of the children we terrorize with the drones our taxes buy: “They buzz around twenty-four hours a day, so I’m always scared; I cannot sleep.” From Robert Greenwald’s new documentary Unmanned.

And look! The tears of the oppressed, But they have no comforter—
On the side of their oppressors there is power, But they have no comforter.
Therefore I praised the dead who were already dead,
More than the living who are still alive.

Violence perpetrated overseas comes home to haunts us, and the police is equipped with imperial war surplus and the mindset that goes with it. This is what we do with peace activists of Disarm Now Plowshares, a group made up of Sacred Heart nuns, Jesuit priests, and their nation-threatening ilk:

Once arrested, the five were cuffed and hooded with sand bags because, the marine in charge testified, “When we secure prisoners anywhere in Iraq or Afghanistan we hood them…, so we did it to them.”

This is what moral bankruptcy looks like at the level of the individual. Nationally, we see racist mass incarceration for profit, hand-outs to war profiteers bought with food stamps plus “change,” child poverty, inner cities worse than war zones; and the list goes on. We are way Beyond Vietnam, and as Martin Luther King said:

A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.

Our national priorities reflect the face of spiritual death.

At a global level, when it comes to dealing with the climate catastrophe, how much confidence should we have in our national security dictatorship that occupies the White House? None whatsoever, of course, but let me leave it at this, I’m starting to repeat myself.

I hope you will join us this Thursday, 11/14/2013, for Dirty Wars.

Capitalism is Bust; What’s next?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Seeding a Post-Capitalist Future: Discussion/video evening at the Voluntown Peace Trust. Friday, October 25, 2013: Potluck at 6:30 p.m. Program begins at 7:30 p.m. Voluntown Peace Trust

Hey 99%, how does it feel to be a disposable commodity?

A little over two decades ago Francis Fukuyama, political scientist and political economist, astonishingly argued in The End of History that in Western liberal democracy humanity might have found the “end-point of mankind’s ideological evolution.” Chris Hedges, a prophet of doom rather than hubris, in his The Death of the Liberal class expressed the view that: “Unfettered capitalism is a revolutionary force that consumes greater and greater numbers of human lives until it finally consumes itself.”

Fukuyama may have distanced himself from what he advocated in the nineties, but he drew a telling caricature of mainstream Western thinking. Even as deregulated capitalism riotously generates Hedges’s nightmares of social despair and destruction of the biosphere —as described in Days of Destruction, Days of Revolt— many of us have been so indoctrinated that we can no longer conceive of an alternative to our “free market” system of  entitlements for the rich.

Almost one hundred years ago Bertrand Russell wrote in Political Ideals:

Political and social institutions are to be judged by the good or harm that they do to individuals. Do they encourage creativeness rather than possessiveness? Do they embody or promote a spirit of reverence between human beings? Do they preserve self-respect?

Can anyone disagree with these values and doubt that we dramatically fail in their realization? After all, we spend about 60% of the discretionary budget on so-called national defense. Combine that with a prison system that disproportionately affects people of color and has  incarceration rate  that exceeds by an order of magnitude, the rates one finds in Europe, Canada, Australia and Japan, and it becomes difficult to disagree with Vijay Prashad when he states: “Prisons and war are the rational extensions of the system in which we live.”

Out-of-control war spending and incarceration are just a few “minor” symptoms of capitalism on its final descent into self-destruction. The mass extinction that might be caused by global warming  has the potential to produce death on a scale hundred  or thousand times as large. Will this happen and when? Nobody knows, but clearly the tipping point for run-away climate change is dangerously close.

<em>Seeding a Post-Capitalist Future:</em>  Discussion/video evening at the Voluntown Peace Trust. Friday, October 25, 2013: Potluck at 6:30 p.m. Program begins at 7:30 p.m. <a href="http://www.voluntownpeacetrust.org" target="_blank">Voluntown Peace Trust</a>
Seeding a Post-Capitalist Future: Discussion/video evening at the Voluntown Peace Trust. Friday, October 25, 2013: Potluck at 6:30 p.m.
Program begins at 7:30 p.m.
Voluntown Peace Trust

What are the alternatives?

This Friday the Land Stewards of the Voluntown Peace Trust will sponsor a discussion and video evening Seeding a Post-Capitalist Future. Although you would not read this in the corporate media —is there still anyone left who is reading them?— many of us agree, once again using Russell’s words, that

Capitalism and the wage system must be abolished; they are twin monsters which are eating up the life of the world.

We recognize what John Buck talks about:

I am supposed to be living in a democracy,” I said, “but I spend
much of my life at work in a basically feudal structure. There is a
Duke of Operations, an Earl of Administration, a Baroness of
Personnel, and so on. […] the only vote I have is with my feet
walking out the door.”

See We the People: Consenting to a Deeper Democracy by John Buck and Sharon Villines.

Few know that right now

  • 25% of the American electric system is co-op or municipal, essentially socialized.
  • Land trusts do development locally: profits accrue to the the public or non-profit.
  • California and Alabama use pension funds to finance in-state investments worker-owned companies.

Contrast this last item with Rhode Island’s use of pension funds to underwrite entitlements for Wall Street hedge fund managers.

To sum up, here is a list of topics for the discussion on Friday:

  • worker cooperatives
  • dynamic self-governance aka sociocracy
  • urban agriculture
  • prison abolition and racism
  • climate change (or catastrophy)

See you this Friday and please bring your friends and neighbors!

Climate change movie at URI an unqualified success


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Fossil fuel divestment is coming to URI

At 7 pm on Monday, October 14th, Fossil Free Rhode Island (FFRI) kicked off its campaign to push the University of Rhode Island to divest from fossil fuels with a screening of Do the Math, the ground-breaking new documentary from 350.org about the climate movement, to a packed house in Weaver Auditorium on the Kingston campus. “We stood … and we sat in the aisles to see Do the Math and to celebrate that fossil fuel divestment will come to URI,” I exclaimed enthusiastically even as I do physics at URI.

Fossil fuel divestment is coming to URI
Fossil fuel divestment is coming to URI

Tommy Viscione from Rotaract hosted, introducing Bianca Piexoto, President of Student Action for Sustainability (SAS), Evan Connolly, Vice President of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics Student Association (ENRESA) and Lisa Petrie, Chair of the Green Task Force of the Unitarian Universalist Congregation of South County presented information on their groups.

Senator Whitehouse, who was unable to attend due to the government shutdown, sent a personal message of support to the group.

“Thank you to the Sierra Club and to all the students participating in this event for taking action on climate change. Every week, I give a speech in the Senate urging my colleagues to wake up to the effects of climate change. The effects are all around us, and they’re only getting worse: sea-level rise, ocean warming and acidification, temperature records and heat waves.

Mother Nature is giving us some pretty strong signals, and we ignore them at our peril. I’ll keep fighting to get Congress to wake up, and your actions on campus are also critical. We need to spread awareness and encourage everyone to make their voices heard. Again, thank you for organizing this event, for pressing for divestment, and for joining the fight against climate change. I hope you enjoy the film.”

The audience sat in rapt silence as the film laid out the “terrifying math” of global warming: the fact that, barring drastic action, we will blow through our “carbon budget–” the amount of fossil fuels we can burn without utterly destroying the climate–within the next 15 years–and, still more frightening, that the fossil fuel companies already have on their books over five times that amount.

Beyond “the Math” it documented the emergence of the burgeoning climate movement in the U.S., from the protests against the proposed Keystone XL pipeline to the divestment campaigns that have sprung up on over 300 college campuses and in scores of cities nationwide. A pre-recorded video message from Bill McKibben, The Next Chapter, was shown after after the movie.

Since we launched the Do The Math tour sixteen American cities including Providence … seven or eight big universities, some of our big denominations like United Church of Christ. (They have plans to divest.) There’s a lot of momentum so we need you in this fight pushing ahead…We continue to fight Keystone in every way we can. There are 75,000 people who have pledged civil disobedience — we hope that it doesn’t come to that, but if it does, you know where I will be … Very glad to see lots of people out for Summer Heat to shut down Brayton Point, the last coal fired station around here. Time to to shut it down.” In fact, last week, the new owners announced plans to retire the plant.

“The movie made me feel hopeful about the possibility of ending the use of fossil fuels and saving the earth and all its inhabitants!” said Jan Creamer of Wakefield.

Then Sarah Martin, ENRESA President, introduced the panel: Abel Collins, RI Sierra Club, Rachel Bishop, Brown Divest Coal, Nick Katkevich, founding member FFRI and Pat Prendergast, a second year environmental and natural resource economics master’s student and a URI Energy Fellow.

A lively discussion followed and the panel adeptly handled a wide range of questions beginning with what Larry Kelland of Wakefield described as a creeping expansion of corporate “rights” cementing the influence of fossil fuel companies influence on public policy due to the Citizens United Supreme Court decision. Other topics that came up were: widening the divestment strategy and asking if the group was looking into asking philanthropic foundations to divest so as to be consistent with their charter to “do public good.” Liz Marsis, formerly of the George Wiley Center, pointed out that diverse environmental groups must band together with social justice groups in demanding change. Nick Katkevich echoed this sentiment, noting that

we need to move outside our silos and see the connections between the crises we face. Climate change will unleash a wave of migration such as the world has never seen, making immigration reform more urgent than ever. The same banks that are financing mountaintop removal mining are forcing families out of their homes.

Judging from the conversations before hand, perhaps as much as one third of the crowd came to get information. There seemed to be groups in which one person was very well informed while others came to learn. Judging from the response and questions, the audience left convinced that there was no doubt that the evidence was compelling and immediate action was needed. Terry Cummings, a member of Occupy Providence and URI alumn said “(it was a) great success. I dig the film (second viewing) yet, it’s the peeps and their awakening that moves me as well.”

Maureen Logan of Westerly, who is also a member of the Raging Grannies, asked about hosting a screening of the documentary there. Terry Cummings, a member of Occupy Providence and URI alumnus, said “(it was a) great success. I dig the film (second viewing) yet, it’s the peeps and their awakening that moves me as well.”

Tommy Viscione, wrapped things up with announcements of upcoming events and actions. Later that night Abel Collins posted his thoughts that summed up the feeling of the event:

I am going to bed tonight with a deep sense of gratitude. Thanks to the great work of URI student volunteers and the member/volunteers of Fossil Free RI, , and the Rhode Island Sierra Club, we had standing room only in the auditorium.

The film was inspiring, but it was the community that came together to experience it and the great discussion that we had afterward that made it meaningful.

Of spying and genocide


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

A couple of days ago, WIRED ran a story: Lawmakers Who Upheld NSA Phone Spying Received Double the Defense Industry Cash. After reading the WIRED post I posted this on the Occupy Providence Facebook page:

A case in point: Jim Langevin supports spying. Bribed to the tune of $119,750, he is near the top of the list of those supported by the defense and intelligence industry.

Of the top 10 defense payola recipients only one House member — Rep. Jim Moran (D-Virginia) — voted to end the NSA spy-on-the-People program.
Of the top 10 defense payola recipients only one House member — Rep. Jim Moran (D-Virginia) — voted to end the NSA spying program.

Most of us have been so indoctrinated that we barely notice that our corrupt electoral system and pervasive scare-mongering are the vehicles that bring us Orwell’s 1984 with its Perpetual War and its Big-Brother-Is-Watching-You.  However that may be, I am not the only one with Orwell on my mind. Almost at the same time, I had an email exchange with a friend in a thread — re: Obama and Orwell — that he started with:

The White House then condemned Amash/Conyers this way: “This blunt approach is not the product of an informed, open, or deliberative process.” What a multi-level masterpiece of Orwellian political deceit that sentence is. The highly surgical Amash/Conyers amendment – which would eliminate a single, specific NSA program of indiscriminate domestic spying – is a “blunt approach,” but the Obama NSA’s bulk, indiscriminate collection of all Americans’ telephone records is not a “blunt approach.” Even worse: Amash/Conyers – a House bill debated in public and then voted on in public – is not an “open or deliberative process,” as opposed to the Obama administration’s secret spying activities and the secret court that blesses its secret interpretations of law, which is “open and deliberative.”

It’s impressive that anyone can write a statement like the one that came from the Obama White House without dying of shame or giggles.

My reply:

I agree. In fact, my impression of Obama’s Climate Action Plan is the same. Here are a couple of red flags.

I came across this in the plan:

In 2012 the President set a goal to issue permits for 10 gigawatts of renewables on public lands by the end of the year. The Department of the Interior achieved this goal ahead of schedule and the President has directed it to permit an additional 10 gigawatts by 2020.

It turns out that this represents less than 0.05% of total US power consumption, way smaller than the accuracy with which this total is known.

Then there was this in the plan:

Natural Gas. Burning natural gas is about one-half as carbon-intensive as coal, which can make it a critical bridge fuel for many countries as the world transitions to even cleaner sources of energy. Toward that end, the Obama Administration is partnering with states and private companies to exchange lessons learned with our international partners on responsible development of natural gas resources.

This is highly misleading. “Burning” ignores extraction. It’s not known how much methane escapes in the process, but it may be a couple of percent. Methane is two orders more effective as a greenhouse gas, although it decays with a decay time on the order of a decade.

If I were a reviewer of a scientific paper with these characteristics, and had little time, I’d tell the editor: “Hey, bro/sis, don’t publish this crap until you get a full report and these and similar issues have been addressed.”

Should a plan upon which the survival of a large fraction of the biosphere depends be judged by anything less than scientific standards?

Where in the plan are we being told that, if we continue along the current trajectory, humanity will within 20 years have put the amount of CO2 it can “safely” put into the atmosphere by 2050?

Where does this plan mention that the US per capita produces five times the global average of CO2 and that we have to cut our fossil fuel habit by roughly 90%, unless we claim US exceptionalism?

I ran some of these comments by the local (New England) head of the EPA. The discussion was interesting. First, this federal cheerleader tried to convince me that I was focussing on only a tiny detail of the plan. I admitted that that was indeed the case, and replied: “Suppose I have a grad student who wrote a paper that I presented at a conference about the solution of a problem. I ‘d be less than amused to find out that I used precious time talking about 0.05% details.”

He changed course, and said that the alternative, namely scaring the population, was a bad idea. If the situations were less serious, it would have been fun to see him squirm.

Conclusion, as Orwell said: “Political language […] is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give the appearance of solidity to pure wind.”

The email exchange ended with this comment of my friend:

I am getting more and more convinced that humans really are no different from any animal whose predators disappear for some reason so that their population runs wild and they destroy their ecosystem. In fact, we are far worse in that we are destroying the entire planet.

Your EPA guy is afraid of scaring people? Ask him to watch this Duck and Cover movie made to warn children about how to protect themselves from atomic bombs! If we can show this to kids, surely we can talk about global warming…

My closing sigh:

This particular EPA guy undoubtedly is one of the enlightened souls. How do you fight these clowns?

Maybe this exchange between physicists is a little too condensed for a general audience;  let me provide some further explanation. In Sustainable Energy — without the hot air David McKay presents a graph showing that globally we produce five tons COequivalent per person year. (“Equivalent” means that other green house gasses, such as methane, have been replaced by the amount of CO2 that has the same warming effect.) In the US per capita we produce five times the global average.

According to Bill McKibben’s Global Warming’s Terrifying New Math, we can put no more than 600 giga tons of CO2 into the atmosphere by mid-century if we want to keep global warming under 2°C.  McKay writes that we were dumping 34 giga tons into the atmosphere in 2000. At that long-surpassed rate mankind will have exhausted its total allotment in 20 years. In other words, mankind today has to cut its rate in half globally to get to 2050 within the maybe-safe limit.

Is it a surprise that the US has been sabotaging Kyoto Protocol, the Durban Platform, the Copenhagen Accord on so on, if our rate of energy usage is about five times the global average? Clearly, if we have to cut our consumption by close to 90% today, tomorrow we’ll need an even bigger cut.  It sounds as if climate plan is to suspend the laws of physics given that “the American way of life is not negotiable.”

The war criminal of the previous administration whom I just quoted also advanced a One-Percent Doctrine: “If there’s a 1% chance that Pakistani scientists are helping al-Qaeda build or develop a nuclear weapon, we have to treat it as a certainty in terms of our response. It’s not about our analysis … It’s about our response.”

Let’s apply this “wisdom” to the issue of methane escaping during natural gas extraction. This might be a controversial topic, but should we not deal with the future of the globe according to a One-Percent Doctrine and pay attention to statements like the following?

Compared to coal, the footprint of shale gas is at least 20% greater and perhaps more than twice as great on the 20-year horizon and is comparable when compared over 100 years.

Maybe some like to believe the America’s Natural Gas Alliance in its critique of the Cornell paper, Methane and Greenhouse-Gas Footprint of Natural Gas from Shale Formations, the origin of the quote above.

Obviously, the One-Percent Doctrine is just that: yet another perpetual-war ploy to further the interests of the 1%. That may have been the previous administration, but I remain to be convinced that the current White House  with its All of the Above approach is not just more of the same presented with better PR. “Fool me once, shame on you; fool, … uh,  …, uh, …”

Why should we trust a White House climate plan that sweeps problems under the rug when recognizing them would not go over well with its fossil fuel paymasters?  Why should we rely on a plan, brainlessly echoed in the national media, that presents less-than-0.05% effects as part of the action? Is the White House treading carefully so as not to scare the kids or is it ignoring reality in its attempt to perpetuate US Dreams of Empire?

1st colonial independence, now let’s do fossil fuels


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Fossil Free Rhode Island's Night of Resistance
Fossil Free Rhode Island

In 1776, Rhode Island was the first colony to declare its independence from the British. In 2013, it is time for Rhode Island to become the first state to declare its independence from fossil fuels.

Fossil Free Rhode Island (FFRI), a growing group made up of community members and alumni, faculty and students from Rhode Island’s colleges is calling on the State of Rhode Island to divest from fossil fuels.

“Every day that goes by without action, means that more and more fossil fuels are being extracted and burned, leading to the wreckage of the climate and the poisoning of our communities,” explained Sherrie’Anne André. “Rhode Island has a moral obligation to act, and the time to act is now.”

Sign the petition here.

FFRI has an ongoing campaign to convince the administrations of the University of Rhode Island, Rhode Island College and the Community College of Rhode Island to divest from the fossil fuel industry. FFRI, joining forces with the divestment movements at the Rhode Island School of Design and Brown University, recently celebrated the Providence City Council’s decision to commit to fossil fuel divestment. Now that the City of Providence has committed to divestment, the time is ripe for the State of Rhode Island to make history, once again, by divesting its multi-billion dollar pension fund from the fossil fuel industry.

The following are just a few examples of the surprisingly rapid growth of the fossil fuel divestment movement:

  • Individuals, governments, corporations, universities, andreligious institutions have successfully used divestment to create positive social change.  Indeed, as President Obama said in
    his June 25 address on climate change: “push your own communities to adopt smarter practices. Invest. Divest.”
  • Massachusetts is considering divestment in Bill S.1225, “An Act relative to public investment in fossil fuels.”
  • The state legislature recently acknowledged the seriousness of climate impacts for our state:  on Friday, June 28, it created the Rhode Island Climate Change Commission to adapt to climate change and to increase economic and ecosystem sustainability.

FFRI cites the following motivations for divestment:

  • To keep global warming under 2°C, mankind can put no more than 600 gigatons of additional CO2 into the atmosphere by midcentury. Current reserves of the fossil-fuel industry total close to 3,000 gigatons, five times the safe limit.
  • The fossil fuel industry has a business plan that involves burning all those reserves, and thus wrecking the climate in total disregard for the biosphere.
  • As climate impacts become more severe and governments curb the burning of fossil fuels to keep global warming to below 2°C, the “carbon bubble” will pop and fossil-fuel share prices will plummet.
  • It is immoral to invest in companies that spend millions of dollars lobbying against clean energy solutions and promoting climate change denial.
  • Divestment will help to suspend the social license of the fossil fuel industry, and will expose “Big Oil” as a morally bankrupt enterprise.
  • Historically, divestment campaigns have been effective, as in the case of helping to end apartheid in South Africa.

Indeed, as the divestment movement gains traction, a growing number of politicians are voicing their support.  Meanwhile, investors across the globe are contemplating the results of over-valuation of oil, coal and gas reserves held by fossil fuel companies and the uncertainty of their future.

With more coastline per square mile than any other state, Rhode Island suffers disproportionately from the worsening reality of climate change.  Ocean acidification, sea level rise and extreme weather events have already taken a heavy toll on our communities. Citing this reality in its recently started petition drive FFRI declares: “We must act now to avoid catastrophe. […] We, the People of Rhode Island, urge our leaders to divest all state funds from fossil fuels to protect our future.”

Prov City Council votes to divest from fossil fuels


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

providence chity council president meme

In a victory for the national movement urging colleges and cities to divest from fossil fuels, the Providence City Council voted this Thursday to divest from the fossil fuel industry. The resolution, introduced by Council President Michael Solomon and Council Majority Leader Seth Yurdin, commits the city to divesting its assets from the top 200 fossil fuel companies because of the industry’s contribution to the climate crisis.

“The Council has a moral obligation to ensure that no public money is being used to promote industries or practices that harm the health and well-being of the people of Providence,” said Yurdin. “Fossil fuels are a major contributor to rising amounts of carbon dioxide, and global warming is already approaching dangerous levels.”

With this resolution, Providence joins 15 other municipalities –including Seattle, San Francisco, and Madison– as well as 6 colleges that have already pledged to divest. Amongst the cities, Providence is the first state capital and the largest east coast city to divest.

Abel Collins, manager of the Rhode Island Chapter of the Sierra Club, celebrated the council’s decision. “Cities around the country will follow the leadership of Providence, the schools of the city too. In the process, more people will be educated about the danger posed by the fossil fuel industry, and perhaps even the political will to deal with the problem in Washington will at last be found. The City Council should be applauded for being on the right side of history.”

At the vote on Thursday, a group of Rhode Island climate activists rallied outside the council chambers in City Hall to show their support for divestment. The group, called Fossil Free Rhode Island (FFRI), is calling for divestment of the state, as well as all Rhode Island municipalities and public universities. To date, Fossil Free Rhode Island has collected over 400 petition signature in support of divestment, and has received the endorsement of a number of local business and nonprofits, including the South-East New England Program of the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC-SENE). FFRI is part of a national fossil fuel divestment campaign that has spread to over 300 colleges and 100 cities, states, and religious institutions over the last 9 months.

“The growth of the national Fossil Free movement has been incredibly quick, and the victory in Providence will inspire the divestment movement at Rhode Island’s colleges. Divesting from fossil fuels is crucial for institutions truly dedicated to providing their students with a sustainable future.” said Peter Nightingale, a professor at The University of Rhode Island and a member of Fossil Free Rhode Island.

(The material presented above is from a press release issued by Fossil Free Rhode Island yesterday. For the resolution of the Providence City Council follow this link.)

Fossil Free RI targets higher education


Fossil Free Rhode Island fights for fossil free:
Hey, folks, unless we act now,
The globe, our home, will boil.
Divest! Divest from coal,
and from tar sand, gas and oil.

Over the last three years, public campaigns to divest from coal, oil, and gas companies have emerged on more than 300 college campuses across North America. Fossil Free Rhode Island (FFRI),  is part of this national movement and is officially kicking off its campaign this week.

FFRI is an organization made up of students, alumni, faculty, staff, and community members and has been collecting signatures from individuals and organizations for several weeks. Earlier this week, FFRI presented letters to the presidents of the University of Rhode Island, Rhode Island College, the Community College of Rhode Island, and the Rhode Island Board of Education.

To commemorate the launch, Fossil Free RI will be hosting a “Night of Resistance” at the First Unitarian Church in Providence on Thursday, June 6th. There will be a screening of 350.org‘s Do the Math, which highlights the movement to take on the fossil fuel industry, followed by discussion on what can be done here in Rhode Island. The event will also feature updates from several groups involved with fossil fuel divestment and climate justice work, including: the Divest Coal Campaign at Brown University, Divest RISD, and 350 Massachusetts. The program starts at 6:30pm and is free and open to the public.
In these letters FFRI urges public higher education in Rhode Island to divest its endowments assets from fossil fuels.
The FFRI campaign is motivated by the following concerns:
  • It is an established fact that more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere leads to higher global temperatures.[1]
  • In 2008, Hansen and collaborators wrote: “If humanity wishes to preserve a planet similar to that on which civilization developed and to which life on Earth is adapted, paleoclimate evidence and ongoing climate change suggest that CO2 will need to be reduced from its current 385 ppm to at most 350 ppm.”[2]
  • The level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere recently reached 400 parts per million, higher than at any other time in recorded history.[3]
  • The average temperature in the U.S. has increased by about 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit since 1895, with more than 80% of the increase occurring since 1980.[4]
  • During the middle of the 20th century, extreme weather events covered much less than 1% of Earth’s surface. Shockingly, now 10% of its surface endures such events.[5]
  • The extraction and burning of fossil fuels are clearly and directly linked to climate change and extreme weather.
  • According to the World Health Organization, global warming causes 150,000 deaths and over five million illnesses a year, and these numbers could double by 2030.[6]
  • Responsible citizens must act now to preserve a livable planet for themselves, their children and future generations.
Education is an investment in the future, but there is no future unless educational institutions and humanity as a whole enact a fundamental change in their investment policies.
[1] The Discovery of Global Warming, http://www.aip.org/history/climate/co2.htm
[2] J. Hansen et al., Target atmospheric CO2: Where should humanity aim?, Open Atmos. Sci. J. (2008), vol. 2, 217 (http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.1126)
[4] Federal Advisory Committee Draft Climate Assessment Report Released for Public Review,
[5] James Hansen, et al., Perception of climate change,
[6] Third World bears brunt of global warming impacts, http://www.news.wisc.edu/11878#continue

(The material presented above is from a press release issued by Fossil Free Rhode Island)

Keep Rhode Island campuses gun free

 

Still before the Rage released at the Board of Education meeting on May 23, 2013.

On April 4, 2013, the University of Rhode Island campus was locked down for hours after, as the Providence Journal reported, “people in a lecture hall said they heard someone say they had a gun. Police found no gun or a shooter.” In response to this event, a URI committee proposed arming the campus police.

At their May 23, 2013 meeting, the Board of Education is expected to voted to allow URI, Rhode Island College and the Community College of Rhode Island, to arm their campus police. URI President, David M. Dooley, endorses the introduction of guns on campus. This and the decision to move URI commencement exercises indoors for security reasons are all symptoms of a society that has lost its way in blind fear, and appoints its university presidents to groups of no academic consequence such as the Homeland Security Academic Advisory Council.[1]

According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, more than 30,000 gun related deaths occur in the US each year, while approximately 100,000 Americans are physical victims of gun violence. How do we even begin to quantify the grief caused by guns in this relentless slaughter in our midst?

A decision to introduce more guns fails to acknowledge that fear on the part of armed police leads to the shooting of unarmed people, often people of color. A tragic incident at Hofstra University, just days ago, confirms this pattern.[3] The introduction of more guns ignores the fact that the UK has a mostly unarmed police force and a fire arm fatality rate that is 40 times lower per capita than in the US. A review of the shooting incidents on college campuses shows that armed police responding with weapons of deadly force failed to protect these communities. Arming campus police may, in many, create the illusion of safety but reality belies this perception. The experiment has been done globally, and the results are in: more guns spells more violence, more victims and more fatalities.

We are alarmed by the prospect of armed police on campus with yet more guns to be introduced into our hyper-violent society with the sociopaths it creates in its image. Since the mass killing in Newtown in December of 2013, there have been more than 4,000 gun fatalities in the US[2] This statistic has not penetrated our national awareness. As a society, we pay attention to spectacular events, but we fail to notice the frightening reality of the numbers of fatalities due to violence, and racial, economic and environmental injustice.

In particular against this backdrop, it is an essential function of our educational system to teach non-violent conflict resolution. Arming campus police is fundamentally inconsistent with this critical function of education.

References

  1. URI President appointed by Secretary Napolitano to new to new Homeland Security council
  2. How many people have been killed by guns since Newtown?
  3. Hofstra University student shot and killed by police trying to save her. A Hofstra University student was accidentally killed by a police officer on Friday during a home invasion and robbery, according to reports.

Arming URI Campus Police: Bullet Points

On April 4, the URI campus was locked down for a couple of hours after, as the Providence Journal states it “people in a lecture hall said they heard someone say they had a gun. Police found no gun or a shooter.”

Today, there was a forum at URI about arming campus police. In his invitation to the event President David Dooley wrote:

Chafee Hall under siege, April 4, 2013

Our desire is to have an informed dialogue about the issue on May 8. Our goal is NOT to attempt to reach consensus, but to assist our community in developing a thorough understanding of the issue and its implications. If additional forums are needed to foster broader dialogue about approaches, strategies, or potential improvements, we will arrange for such meetings.

Does that not sound a little condescending? The timing is a tad unsettling too: this is a time when students are taking finals and faculty are desperately trying to wrap up the semester. Oh, cranky old me, I must be just having a really bad day! However that may be, I attended the forum and made the following points:

  • I am concerned about the preliminary report about an individual who allegedly had a gun in URI’s Chafee Social Science Center on April 4, 2013.
  • Why am I concerned?
    • Here is the essence of the report: police entered Chafee with a five-minute delay caused by the fact that campus police is unarmed and had to wait for armed assistance.
    • To solve this “problem” URI will spend $300,000 per year to arm campus police.
  • I am concerned because the report provides little more than violence- and fear-enhancing recommendations.
  • The report fails to acknowledge that fear on the part of armed police leads to the shooting of unarmed people, often people of color.
  • The report ignores that the UK has an unarmed police force and a fire arm fatality rate that is 40 times lower per capita than in the US.
  • Campus security should be based on nonviolent conflict resolution. Not a dime in the proposal for that approach. Why were the experts of our own Center for Nonviolence & Peace Studies at URI not consulted? [Here is a link to Paul Bueno de Mesquita’s, the center’s director, input for this forum.]
  • Do we really need to spend $300,000 per year just to avoid a five minute delay?  A delay is often good; it allows for a considered response rather than one dictated by panic.
  • I am concerned about the proposed solutions; they are symptomatic of a hysterical, hyper-violent society.
  • I am concerned about solutions that seem to come straight from the Homeland Security Academic Advisory Council of which President Dooley is a member. [What I did not mention at the forum is that Chancellor Linda Katehi was on this very same council when she infamously had Occupy UC Davis students pepper sprayed in the fall of 2011.]
  • This proposal is an agenda looking for an opportunity, all in the spirit of never letting a good crisis go to waste.

More was said at the forum, but not much time was left after two URI administrators had claimed fifteen minutes “developing a thorough understanding of the issue and its implications,” leaving the rest of the hour for Jane and John Campus Public.

Also the Board of Education has been talking about arming campus police. The board had as one of agenda items of today’s meeting: “Establish a Policy Enabling URI, RIC and CCRI to Make Individual Institutional Decisions to Arm Campus Police.”  See also House Bill Number 6005, which is on tomorrow’s agenda of the House Committee on Judiciary.

Privatization of Higher Ed Violates State Constitution


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

As reported  here and here, the University of Rhode Island has spent close to $500,000 on repairs of its president’s tuition-funded home, which is among the fringe benefits that come with the president’s job, such as a car, an expense account, and club dues.

Excessive administrative spending is but one of many results of nationwide privatization of public education.  Particularly distressing in this context is the root cause of this development, namely the decline of the fraction of the URI budget that comes from the Rhode Island general revenue, a percentage that has dropped from 60% in the 1950s to less than 10% currently.

Privatization has resulted in an explosive increase in tuition.  As documented in Trends in College Pricing 2012, a College Board publication, inflation-adjusted tuition and fees have increased by more than 350% since the early 1980s. Excessive spending on presidential perks, in particular at URI, typifies a litany of deplorable policy decisions that coddle university and college administrators at the expense of public education.  Recent examples are:

  • URI’s previous president got a 14 percent raise in 2008-09.
  • The previous president cashed in with a retirement incentive of 40 percent of the $183,000 “faculty” salary he earned after his resignation as president ot the university, a salary which happens to roughly 80 percent higher than full professor faculty salaries.
  •  URI’s current president started his tenure at a salary about 25 percent above what his predecessor ever made.
  • A study performed for the American Association of University Professors found that between 2004 and 2010 spending on instruction and academic support at URI declined by 10 percent; while spending on administration increased by 25 percent.

In spite of all of these excesses and skewed priorities, the almost defunct Board of Governors of Higher Education routinely justifies the tuition hikes and administrative bloat it authorizes by claiming concern for quality education.  Of course, the ultimate responsibility for the neglect of public education rests with the Rhode Island legislature.  The legislature and its serial enablers of the Board of Governors for Higher Education, which is tasked with oversight of public higher education, are duty bound to uphold the Rhode Island Constitution and pertinent statutes.  Their collective failure in this respect is monumental. As Sections I and IV of Article 12 of the Rhode Island Constitution state:

  • […] it shall be the duty of the general assembly to promote public schools and public libraries, and to adopt all means which it may deem necessary and proper to secure to the people the advantages and opportunities of education and public library services.
  • The general assembly shall make all necessary provisions by law for carrying this article into effect. It shall not divert said money or fund from the aforesaid uses, nor borrow, appropriate, or use the same, or any part thereof, for any other purpose, under any pretence whatsoever.

 Title XVI [of the Rhode Island General Laws] adds:

  •  […] the purpose of continuing and maintaining the University of Rhode Island […] in order to promote the liberal and practical education of the industrial classes in the pursuit and the professions of life […]

Privatization is sold as if it provides better services at a lower cost to the taxpayer, but the real costs to Rhode Island and its citizens are hidden.  In education, chief among those hidden costs are increased tuition and interest on student loans, which exclusively benefits moneylenders.  The examples listed above are just a small sample of the many symptoms that characterize a society unable to keep in check the predatory impulses of a small minority.

Songs of Rage


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 2448

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

“What do I know that would cause me, a reticent, Midwestern scientist, to get myself arrested in front of the White House protesting? And what would you do if you knew what I know?” With these questions James Hansen opens his riveting presentation Why I must speak out about climate change on TED. Hansen, whom the Bush administration tried to silence in one of their numerous attempts to change reality by denial, is known for his 1980s congressional testimony in which he started raising awareness of global warming and its threat to the biosphere.

I too start with questions: “What would cause us, upstanding seniors, to stand on street corners, dressed like fools, singing songs with our own, supposedly epoch-making Raging Granny lyrics? And, you who know what we know, what are you doing?”

Raging Grannies protesting. (Photo by Danielle Dirocco)

What, in fact, do I know that deeply concerns my inner scientist-grandfather? As Hansen explains, greenhouse gasses cover the Earth with a blanket that makes it absorb more solar power than it radiates back into space. To restore the energy balance, the Earth heats up as required by laws of physics, laws soon to be repealed by an ALEC inspired legislature near you.

Let Hansen speak:

The total energy imbalance now is about six-tenths of a watt per square meter. That may not sound like much, but when added up over the whole world, it’s enormous. It’s about 20 times greater than the rate of energy use by all of humanity. It’s equivalent to exploding 400,000 Hiroshima atomic bombs per day 365 days per year. That’s how much extra energy Earth is gaining each day. This imbalance, if we want to stabilize climate, means that we must reduce CO2 from 391 ppm, parts per million, back to 350 ppm. That is the change needed to restore energy balance and prevent further warming.

Those of us who are not addicted to this so-last-century medium called TV know the problems caused by global warming, but not all may realize the magnitude and frequency of the extremes that have ravaged the Earth during the last decades. Yes, we have seen the heat waves, the droughts, the wild fires, and the record breaking hurricanes and typhoons. But nothing is more variable than the weather! So, why should we be worried by a list like this? Indeed, no particular item is anything new under the Sun, but new is the frequency of extreme weather events. Hansen and coworkers[1] did the statistics and found —emphasis mine— that:

An important change is the emergence of a category of summertime extremely hot outliers, more than three standard deviations (3σ) warmer than the climatology of the 1951-1980 base period. This hot extreme, which covered much less than 1% of Earth’s surface during the base period, now typically covers about 10% of the land area. It follows that we can state, with a high degree of confidence, that extreme anomalies such as those in Texas and Oklahoma in 2011 and Moscow in 2010 were a consequence of global warming because their likelihood in the absence of global warming was exceedingly small. We discuss practical implications of this substantial, growing, climate change.

How does the focus-group driven world of denial, aka American politics, respond to this string of disasters? In an interview with Jessica Sites of In These Times indefatigable Amy Goodman of Democracy Now!’ comments:

We are the ones making that connection; the corporate media does not. In all three debates between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, do you know how many times the words ‘climate change’ came up? None.

Am I the only one who thinks that these so-called leaders should be tried for complicity in a conspiracy to commit genocide? It seems that to those of us who do not have their brains washed by the Supreme Courtisans of the Corporate States of America this should be a clear a case:

Article II of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide: “(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;”

“Group” here refers to that half of humanity who cannot afford privatized, distilled water, and filtered, cold air, to be sold by the Corporations of Mass Destruction that own government.

Oh well, those ElecToon debates took place before we won the elections, which, as we all know, ended in a mandate for change, as they always do. Yet, somehow, we are wasting time on inane fiscal cliff theatrics. Why? To further the bipartisan program of shredding the social contract by unbridled privatization and imperial overreach, brought to us by the “world’s best military.” Indeed, as Major Ralph Peters describes it: “The de facto role of the US armed forces will be to keep the world safe for our economy and open to our cultural assault. To those ends, we will do a fair amount of killing.”

Chief Sitting Bull (Tatanka Iyotake) diagnoses this sick conduct of the “developed” world like this:

Strangely enough, they have a mind to till the soil, and the love of possessions is a disease in them. These people have made many rules that the rich may break, but the poor may not! They have a religion in which the poor worship, but the rich will not! They even take tithes of the poor and weak to support the rich and those who rule. They claim this mother of ours, the Earth, for their own use, and fence their neighbors away from her, and deface her with their buildings and their refuse. They compel her to produce out of season, and when sterile she is made to take medicine in order to produce again. All this is sacrilege.

You can find this quote in Days of Destruction Days of Revolt, Chris Hedges’ and Joe Sacco’s agonizing account of their travels in “sacrifice zones,” those areas ruined in the name of unbridled profit, progress, and industrial advancement. This exchange between
Chris Hedges and Bill Moyers sums it up perfectly:

CHRIS HEDGES: There’s no way to control corporate power. The system has broken down, whether it’s Democrat or Republican. And because of that, we’ve all become commodities. Just as the natural world has become a commodity that is being exploited until it is exhausted, or it collapses.
BILL MOYERS: You call them sacrifice zones.
CHRIS HEDGES: Right.
BILL MOYERS: Explain what you mean by that.
CHRIS HEDGES: Well, they have the individuals who live within those areas have no power. The political system is bought off, the judicial system is bought off, the law enforcement system services the interests of power, they have been rendered powerless. You see that in the coal fields of Southern West Virginia.
[…]
And when we flew over the Appalachians, and it’s a terrifying experience, because you realize only then do you realize how vast the devastation is. Just as when we were both in the war in Bosnia, you couldn’t grasp the destruction of ethnic cleansing until you actually flew over Bosnia, and village after village after village had been razed and destroyed.

And the same was true in the Appalachian Mountains. And these people are poisoned. The water is poisoned, it smells, the soil is poisoned. And the people who are making tremendous profits from this don’t even live in West Virginia—

Of course, the World according to Peabody Coal Company and Bechtel Corporation, assisted by their flunkies of government by and for the Ruling Class was documented in Broken Rainbow(1985). Libraries have been filled with accounts of our colonial exploits. Indeed, in 1860 the Dutch writer known by his pen name Multatuli wrote about the former Dutch colonial sacrifice zone, today’s Indonesia, and lamented: “I told you, reader, that my story is monotonous.” Therefore, let us sing Songs of Rage by Grannies Marlies and Paige, and the Raging Grannies of Greater Westerly:

Miner’s Lament
(Tune of My Darling Clementine)

In the cabins
In the canyons
Live our families on the dole
They have asthma
They have cancer
And the wind blows black as coal

Oh my homeland
Oh my homeland
Oh my Blue Ridge Mountain home
Once I was a simple miner
Now the mountain tops are gone

With the treasures
In our valleys
We should all be millionaires
Corporations took our profits
Left the landscape scarred and bare

Oh my homeland
Oh my homeland
Oh my Blue Ridge Mountain home
You are lost and gone forever
And the mountain tops are blown
        (right off!)

Fiscal Cliff Talk
(Tune of Little Boxes)

Fiscal cliff talk as the globe warms,
Fiscal cliff talk as they dilly dally,
Fiscal cliff talk on the bube tube,
Fiscal cliff talk is a scam.
There’s the wild fires and the dust bowl,
And the heat waves and the hurricanes,
And the pols seem but to dilly dally,
And they all want just the same.

Fiscal cliff talk on the bube tube,
Fiscal cliff talk but to dilly dally,
Fiscal cliff talk, fiscal cliff talk,
Fiscal cliff talk is a scam.
There’s the Blue Dogs and the Red Dogs,
And the Dem talk and the Repub talk,
And they all seem but to dilly dally,
And they all want just the same.

See the people on the bube tube
Carry water for the ruling class,
Medicare cuts, Medicaid cuts,
Payoffs for gigantic greed.
And there’s home loans and there’s student loans,
And the debt collectors agencies,
‘Cuz the rich need their entitlements.
Let the common good be damned!

With austerity and with deep cuts,
They shall tear up social safety nets.
For all drama ’bout posterity,
Fiscal cliff talk is a scam.
With their pipelines and their tar sands,
They will sell off the environment,
But they don’t care ’bout posterity,
As they buy and sell the Earth.

1. Hansen, J., Mki. Sato, and R. Ruedy, 2012: Perception of climate change, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 109, 14726-14727, E2415-E2423, doi:10.1073/pnas.1205276109.

Raging Grannies Protest Forbes, Hinckely Event


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Steve Forbes, a multi-failed candidate for the presidential nomination of the Republican Party, will be hosting a fundraiser for Barry Hinckley’s campaign and the Raging Grannies of Greater Westerly will be present at 4:45pm to welcome them.

The event will be at The Ocean House in Watch Hill on Wednesday, August 29.

Mr. Forbes is famous for supporting many proposed reforms of entitlement plans. He has been a time-honored supporter of a program called Trickle-Up Economics, one of the major bipartisan productions that, during the last thirty years, has allowed the rich to appropriate a disproportionate fraction of the wealth of the USA, where the richest 400 people now own more collective wealth than the bottom 150 million.

Mr. Hinckley’s candidacy will continue in this tradition of entitlement programs designed to serve the wealthy. For instance, he told the Providence Journal in April of 2011 that he would cut Social Security benefits: “Citing Social Security as an example, [Hinckley] said he would not change benefits for people already collecting, but would change the assumptions for people who are still years away from collecting. ‘Future generations that are not in the program have to have their expectations reset. End of story,’ he said.”

Instead of receiving social security, in the world according to Mr. Hinckley, people will be doing their own private investing. In so doing, they will pay for an entitlement program for unearned income and bonuses of Wall Street bankers.

Mr. Hinckley is also on record supporting plans to turn Medicare into yet another entitlement program for the 1% by transforming Medicare into a voucher system as of 2022. This will leave seniors at the mercy of private insurers. His plans would do for Medicare what has already been accomplished for the health care insurance industry, where 20 cents of every premium dollar goes toward administrative costs and profit, so that only 80 cents is left to pay for actual health care. Medicare, by comparison, currently pays out more than 98 cents of each premium dollar for actual health care. The difference between the current corporate health care system, on the one hand, and Medicare For All, if it existed, on the other, costs every single one of us about $2,000 per year.

The Raging Grannies note that in spite of the already excessive contribution of the People to entitlement programs benefiting the wealthy, Mr. Hinckley and Mr. Forbes plan to hand over more and more of the nation’s wealth to their corporate paymasters and their criminal Wall Street friends.

URI Contracts and the Privatization of Higher Ed.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

At the March 19 meeting of the Rhode Island Board of Governors of Higher Education, the board was supposed to discuss the tentative agreement that had been ratified that very same day by URI faculty. Unfortunately, because of the disruption of this meeting by Occupy URI and the Raging Grannies, the board was so shocked that thediscussion about the tentative agreement had to be postponed. At least, that was the story line originally put out by the board. It now seems that the tender soul of the board was so traumatized that it even postponed a meeting originally planned for April 2.

At its meeting this week, on May 7, a bitterly divided board rejected the tentative agreements with faculty at URI in addition to agreements with professional staff associations at RIC and CCRI, and the agreement with URI’s graduate assistants.

Here is what I had to say at the public forum at the May 7 meeting:

I am a member of Occupy URI and affiliated with The Ad Hoc Committee to Defend the University. Governor Chafee interjected himself in the contract negotiations stating that a 3 percent raise is unacceptable “in a time of strained state finances.” He turned eleven month process into a farce. Take into account the increases we pay for health care and you find that faculty have been sliding back for at least five years. Meanwhile, America’s CEOs leap forward by 15 percent in a second year of double-digit income hikes. More than a decade ago Lehman Brothers advised their clients: “[…] we can privatize the educational system, make a lot of money of it.”

How is this done? One engages in union busting, assaults faculty tenure, and puts CEOs in charge of universities. Here are some numbers:

  1. URI’s former CEO got a 14 percent raise in 2008-09.
  2. Our former CEO cashes in with a retirement incentive of 40 percent of his $183,000 current “faculty” salary. Last time I checked faculty salary was about $100k per year. Hey, you got to show your former CEOs a little love!
  3. Our current CEO started off at about 25 percent more than his predecessor ever made.
  4. Between 2004 and 2010 spending on instruction and academic support declined by 10 percent; spending on administration increased by 25 percent. Meanwhile, this board justifies tuition hikes by claiming concern for quality education!

Explaining the perverse priorities of this nation in three minutes is tough. Let me just mention that we spend $4,000 per person per year to support the imperial war machine. For a quarter million dollars per person over a lifetime we could have free public education for all, and then some!

Rather than making a trip to Washington to do something about this immoral waste of money, governor Chafee went to Afghanistan just last week to boost the war economy.

If you want to do something about state funding, call Speaker Gordon Fox. Tell him to stop blocking a floor vote for the Cimini-Miller Tax Fairness bill (H-7729). The idea contained in the bill has the support of 70 percent of the Rhode Island population: it would undo the Carcieri tax cuts for the rich and generate $135 million additional revenue per year. Fox’s telephone number is 222-2466.

Is it a surprise that in this time of unrelenting attacks on educators and their unions, the California Faculty Association produced a 95 percent voting majority authorizing a September strike?

Under these circumstances, I will vote for any job action the AAUP might propose!

Bringing more bad news from the privatization front, Peter Kerwin posted the following message on the
Occupy URI Facebook site
:

“Hi there. I’m looking to talk to someone in the organization about trying to compile stories from students about bad private student loans. Please contact me at pkerwin3@cox.net so we can set up a meeting. I am the Chief of Program Development at the Rhode Island Higher Education Assistance Authority and am trying to get some of this info to a ProJo reporter who has expressed interest in doing a story. My agency has been the subject of a hostile takeover by the Rhode Island Student Loan Authority, a private student loan business which is trading on its very thin connection to the state to trick students into taking their private loans, which are not as consumer-friendly and lack the repayment options that come with federal student loans. Thanks!”

Peter Kerwin was fired from his job, as of May 1, after a board meeting that took place on April 20. All of this happened –oh, coincidence!– after he filed a whistle blowers complaint with the Attorney General’s office, the Federal Trade Commission, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and the US Department of Education. The complaint was that “members of the Rhode Island Student Loan Authority board have a potential financial stake in taking over Rhode Island Higher Education Assistance Authority and its data.”

The takeover is part of an ongoing process of privatization of student loans, something that was introduced as part of the reconciliation process of the Affordable Care Act, which should probably be known as the Care and Feeding of the 1% Act. We are planning to post a steady drip of information about this issue on the Occupy Facebook page in the coming weeks.

Finally it is worth mentioning that the May 6 edition of the Providence Journal reported that “the board chairman is trying to build support for the Office of Higher Education absorbing the Rhode Island Higher Education Authority.” Or might that be the Rhode Island Student Loan Authority, possibly with all the problems mentioned by Peter Kerwin? Sounds like an interesting development; let’s see who will take over whom.

Why Did LGBT Expert Leave URI?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

To announce an event to be held a the LGBTIQQ Symposium, running from April 2 through 6, URI issued a press release in which it announced the symposium while highlighting the following: “The University of Rhode Island will present a panel discussion focusing on the unique workplace experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, intersex, queer or questioning individuals as they navigate life after graduation.”

In the context of its discussion of  “unique workplace experiences,” the panel should raise the question of why Andrew Winters is no longer at URI, his former workplace. This is a particularly harrowing question, as, since the mid nineties through last spring, Andrew Winters was the primary organizer of this very symposium.  Indeed, thus far many questions have been raised, but not a single one has been answered.

Here is a short summary of what has happened:

On April 5 of 2011, a number of concerned members of the URI community wrote a letter to URI President David Dooley.  In the letter we stated, with a sense of alarm and profound regret, our objections to the letter of reprimand that Andrew Winters had received from Kathryn Friedman, at the time Interim Associate Vice President in the Office of Community, Equity and Diversity.  Ms. Friedman alleged that the LGBT URI community had “without exception” expressed no confidence in Andrew Winters.

The two words “without exception” capture the unprofessional nature of this communication and the atmosphere of intimidation and bullying that characterized Andrew Winters’ “unique workplace experience,” once the university administration decided that his tenure at URI would be terminated.  Many also understand that it was precisely Andrew’s unrelenting effort to address bullying and harassment at URI that rendered him unwelcome in eyes of the URI administration.

Our esteemed colleague URI President David M. Dooley, replied: “This issue, however, pertains to a confidential personnel matter and I am not at liberty to meet with you to discuss the situation.”

The trouble with this administrative response was that it applies to any conceivable form of arbitrary and capricious conduct of the administration directed at anyone.  By definition, any such abuse of power by administrators could be construed as “a confidential personnel matter.” and, following this reasoning, would therefore be beyond scrutiny, discussion, and accountability.  This objection, predictably, drew no response.  The same happened to the letter to the Rhode Island Board of Governors of Higher Education.  The Board never had the courtesy to acknowledge receipt of our letter, and to date has failed to take appropriate corrective action.

Fast forward to Tuesday, Jan. 24.  At that date, The House Commission to Study Public Higher Education Affordability and Accessibility in Rhode Island visited URI for a public hearing to collect expert testimony to improve affordability and accessibility of higher education.  At the hearing, I made the following statement and raised the following questions, which are recorded in the minutes of the meeting:

As of August 2011, URI is number 14 on the Princeton Review list of the bottom 20, least LGBT friendly schools. Clearly, URI is not accessible to students for whom the LGBT climate and safety is a concern. URI operates under the cloud of what it has done to Andrew Winters, who, as we know, was bullied out. Your committee should look into several issues:

1. To force Andrew Winters’ departure, how much money was spent on URI’s offer he “could not refuse?” How much on unemployment benefits to which he is entitled?
2. The URI administration has stonewalled every single question by hiding under the cover of confidentiality. How can there be public oversight of URI procedures, governance, and due process?
3. How can there be progress, unless URI is held fully accountable for the injustice done to Andrew Winters?
4. How can Andrew Winters’ successor, Annie Russell, operate effectively in a climate in which messengers of bad news are not tolerated?
5. With all the above questions looming unanswered, how can there ever be adequate support for LGBT students at URI?
The charge of the committee explicitly refers to student support and governance issues. In other words, all the issues raised here are germane to the committee’s charge.

Since its inception, the URI LGBTIQQ Symposium has been conducted in the tradition of promoting cultural sensitivity and advocacy for fair and equitable treatment of LGBTIQQ people.  In keeping with this tradition, I respectfully ask that the citizens of Rhode Island demand redress of the injustice done to Andrew Winters and correction of the University governance that made this possible.


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387