Bob Flanders announced his campaign for a US Senate seat today in Central Falls, where he was once the court-appointed receiver as the city went through bankruptcy. The Rhode Island Democratic Party responded by pointing out how much money Flanders made in that role.
“There’s no question that the million dollars Robert Flanders and his deputies collected from city coffers placed an extraordinary burden on taxpayers and retirees during the most difficult time in Central Falls’ history,” Kevin Olasanoye, the executive director of the state Democratic Party, said in a press release sent out as Flanders made his announcement.
The Democrats were calling attention to a recent RI Future report that revealed Flanders and Gayle Corrigan’s consulting company together took more than a million dollars from Central Falls’ struggling coffers. RI Future obtained the information through an Access to Public Records request to Central Falls while looking into Corrigan.
The Democrats’ press release says, “Flanders and his frequent business associate Gayle Corrigan extracted more than $1 million in fees from Central Falls’ bankruptcy.” It shows how the specter of Gayle Corrigan, the embattled and controversial rookie town manager in East Greenwich could hang over his campaign.
In June, Flanders, an East Greenwich resident, told RI Future he was an early advocate of Corrigan’s to EG Town Council President Sue Cienki, prior to Corrigan being formerly considered for a consultant role. “Gayle was someone we did talk about, yes,” Flanders said. “We talked about her skill set and what she can bring to the table. We talked about doing some sort of analysis.”
Corrigan was chief of staff to Flanders in Central Falls. Since Corrigan became town manager of East Greenwich, Tim Cavazza, a partner in Flanders’ law firm, has taken over talks with the local fire fighters, whom Corrigan and Cienki began targeting when Corrigan was first hired as a consultant.
Cienki, an early fundraiser for Flanders’ campaign, was at the event today (as seen in the tweet below).
Waiting for Bob Flanders to announce his bid for US Senate. Protestors lined up outside. @ABC6 pic.twitter.com/dgsiS3ToMq
— Melissa Randall (@MRandallABC6) November 16, 2017
The Democrats also accused Flanders of being a “rubber stamp” for the Trump agenda, “providing tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy at the expense of working people, stripping health insurance from families, decimating the Social Security and Medicare benefits Rhode Islanders have earned over a lifetime of hard work,” said Olasanoye.
Flanders said he voted for Donald Trump, saw merit in the so-called Muslim travel ban, and would have supported a Trumpcare bill before the Senate, he told RI Future in June.
But at his event today, Flanders said he is running for office to combat hyperpartisanship. He said he supports a ban on bump stocks, which can turn a semi-automatic gun into an automatic gun.
In June, Flanders said he falls somewhere between Jack Reed and Mitch McConnell on the ideological spectrum, and thinks he can help engender compromise between Republicans and Democrats. “We have to have someone who can get something done and compromise,” he said, “not just lob bombs at the other side.”
Known more for his sharp wit than his penchant for bringing people together, ss the receiver for Central Falls during bankruptcy, Flanders infamously said public sector workers had a choice between a haircut and a beheading. Then he lampooned his role at the Follies as Darth Vader, Lord of the Pink Slip.
He’s been a Barrington Town Council president, a Rhode Island Supreme Court justice, the chairman of the state Board of Regents for Elementary and Secondary Education, and a board member of Common Cause Rhode Island.
But before he earns the right to face Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, the Democratic incumbent looking for his third term, Flanders will have to best Coventry state Rep. Bobby Nardolillo in a Republican primary.
Both Flanders and Nardolillo are fiscal conservatives, with Flanders more socially moderate than Nardolillo. Nardolillo will likely appeal to the Trump wing of the GOP with Flanders appealing more to the old guard.

It may be of interest that NPR reported that Flanders attacked Senator Whitehouse for being concerned about climate change. Sad! I take this as an indication that he would be a rubber stamp for Trump’s anti-environment policies.
I didn’t see it that way.
I see it as an indication that he (Flanders) stands by our constitution and the first amendment. Whitehouse thought people who’s opinion differed from his on the so called ‘settled science’ of man-made global warming should be prosecuted under the RICO act. Preposterous thinking for a US Senator, IMO.
Whitehouse === EXTEMEMLY partisan left wing ‘my way or the hiway’ type.
Flanders===right leaning centrist willing to reach across the isle for the good of the country.
It’s early yet and I’m sure they’ll be more to come. I’ll try to keep an open mind but, it’s difficult when a hypocrite like Sheldon is on one side of the scale.
This is not protected speech…
Harvard study: Exxon ‘misled the public’ on climate change for nearly 40 years
http://money.cnn.com/2017/08/23/investing/exxon-misled-climate-change-harvard-study/index.html
…and as an allegedly concerted effort, organized over decades likely illegal under racketeering laws. Frankly ridiculous to suggest the 1st Amendment includes protections for companies to knowingly make false or misleading statements.
Who to believe? He said…she said…
From Forbes:
“These biased, misleading, and totally irrelevant “surveys” form the best “evidence” global warming alarmists can muster in the global warming debate. And this truly shows how embarrassingly feeble their alarmist theory really is.”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/05/30/global-warming-alarmists-caught-doctoring-97-percent-consensus-claims/#1ae2b204485d
My post was in response to Barry’s post about Flanders seemingly not being concerned about climate change when that clearly is NOT what he said. Whitehouse says basically ‘we’ve got to do something before we cook ourselves’ but, where does he stand on the power plant proposal for our area. Bluster and rhetoric is what I hear from Whitehouse, not action. That would take courage.
I’ll keep reading about both sides of this issue and I hope you do too. Happy Thanksgiving.
Gasp! Another “think tank” funded by the usual suspects thinks we should ignore the problem.
http://freedomfoundationfacts.com/index.php/2016/01/24/who-funds-the-freedom-foundation/
Who to believe? I’ll stick with the scientists.
Central Falls.
Some think….Flanders.
Others think… Fuerza Laboral.
I hope that those who rally around Fuerza win out, short term and long.
But, maybe the carnival to the bottom has to run its full course.
Ultimately, you can’t protect people from low-level cons, if surgical short term emoluments
are really the name of the cynical game.
Maybe, though, years and years of slow and steady will result in
an “overnight” sea change.
Even a police chief got the boot.
The hapless Obama administration set the country on its course to De Vos
when our private school president solved the public education crisis by backing
a school superintendent who couldn’t cut the discipline of Jamestown.
Much love, CF. Find a way.