SEIU, Raimondo reach agreement to improve early childhood education

Last week, Governor Gina Raimondo and SEIU District 1199 New England reached an agreement concerning family childcare providers that are part of the state’s Child Care Assistance Program. This agreement was made in part due to legislation from 2013, which established collective bargaining rights for family childcare providers. The SEIU unanimously approved the two-year agreement.

Photo courtesy of http://www.seiu1199ne.org/1199-history/
Photo courtesy of http://www.seiu1199ne.org/1199-history/

One of the largest parts of the agreement is a $250,000 investment by the state to establish a jointly administered training and professional development fund. This program will help to improve the quality of care and early learning delivered by care providers. Those who are part of CCAP will also receive their first reimbursement rate increase since 2008.

“We have taken a big step forward in making it easier for working parents to find quality child care options in their communities that meet their work schedules,” SEIU District 1199NE Executive Vice President Patrick Quinn said. “All workers deserve a living wage and this historic agreement shows that Rhode Island is ready to recognize and live up to the value of the important work of our early educators.”

RI KIDS COUNT data shows that more than 70 percent of Rhode Island children under the age of six have parents who work, and are in child care at least part time. The Department of Human Services also reported that CCAP served approximately 5,800 families and 9,400 families in July 2015.

“Investing in our kids, and the systems that care of them, is essential to ensure everyone has an opportunity to make it in Rhode Island,” Governor Raimondo said. “Providing quality, affordable child care removes a critical barrier to getting and keeping a job for many of our hardworking families, improves the development of our kids and prepares them for success in the classroom. I am pleased that we have reach an agreement with SEIU to enhance our commitment to high quality child care and support working families.”

Rethinking the Proper Role for the State Politician


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
State House Dome from North Main Street
State House Dome from North Main Street
The State House dome from North Main Street. (Photo by Bob Plain)

There’s a “What can you do for me?” mentality about politics that I doubt anyone in Rhode Island will dispute.

People say over and over again, “The legislature stinks, but my guy is ok.” And then they vote for the incumbent.

Sitting legislators have the power of the budget to fund and disburse. Line items in the budget are a great way to fund important projects in local neighborhoods, but they’re also a great source of pork, influence and publicity.

When a politician builds a playground, what is she really doing but returning your tax money to your block? She might have shown up on groundbreaking day to hoist a shovel. And she’ll show up again for the ribbon cutting.

One voter recently told me that my opponent had regularly donated $2,000 to an organization she cared about. I asked if it came from him or from his campaign committee*, and she didn’t know. I said, no. I can’t do that, and I can’t even promise that I’ll have enough power to swing a line item. If you want business as usual, I told her, then you can vote for my opponent.

What is shocking is how inexpensively Rhode Islander’s sell their votes. A playground here, lifting a parking ban there, getting a sidewalk fixed here.

Even the pernicious practice of getting rides to the polls implies that a voter doesn’t care enough to walk or drive or arrange a ride to cast a ballot. Remember those pictures of women in Iraq with the purple fingers? They made it hundreds of miles and waited days to cast their ballots.

No politician is going to promise to raise taxes in an election cycle. And no politician is going to say, “We’re going to cut your funding.” (Well, the Democrats are saying the first about the rich, and the Republicans are saying that to the poor, but let’s set aside those quarreling minorities ;-)

So, in a time of shrinking tax bases and increasing costs, how can we solve our problems? Can a politician help?

Creating Connections

Not long ago, I met a woman who was taking care of her two grandchildren, ages 6 and 2. She’d had a good job, but had been laid off. When she did, she lost her child care, and now she couldn’t get a job because she couldn’t find someone to take care of the kids while she looked for a job. Catch 22.

I told her that I had no idea if I, as a possible State Rep could do anything to help her, but I’d see.

Half a block up the street, I met another voter who told me that Casey Family Services had a grandparents group.

The next day, I called them and learned a bit about The Rhode Island Partnership for Family Connections. 

Here was a group of grandparents helping other grandparents. I emailed the grandmother the information, and hope that she follows through.

A few days after that, I met with Ray Watson at the Mt. Hope Community Center. He said that his organization couldn’t host something like a baby-sitting group, because of insurance liability concerns. He also said that he would be happy to help or connect people any way he could.

“We try to make this organization part of the community,” he said. “We’re open most of the time. People can just stop by.”

We also brainstormed that a local FaceBook group to connect people with similar issues might be another low-cost solution. Another email went out to the Grandmother. I haven’t heard anything back yet.

Connecting the Threads

A few days later, I was at one of those unique Rhode Island meetings where twenty people spend an hour discussing the placement and economics of four or five crosswalks.

Held at the Rochambeau Community Library after hours (the next time someone asks why we have libraries, aside from the wealth of knowledge, they serve as one of our key non-religious meeting points), the purpose of the meeting was to explain the future traffic calming measures near the Hope Street “business district.”

The short version was this: because the Narragansett Bay Commission was going to repave the streets, the Hope Street Merchant’s association hired a firm to design a traffic calming plan. The NBC offered to pick up the tab for the new raised sidewalks (think Kennedy Plaza not Smith Hill) and pedestrian bumpouts. The only problem was that the NBC’s mandiate stopped at the Cumberland Farms, just north of Rochambeau Avenue. In other words, the one place in the neighborhood where children cross the street most frequently—the library—was on the outside of the domain.

Fortunately, most of the players were in the room, so I asked a few questions:

  1. Was the NBC hiring a contractor to do this work?
    Yes.
  2. Since the contractor would have workers, machinery and supplies on-hand wouldn’t it be more cost-effective to build six crosswalks instead of five?
    Maybe.
  3. Why maybe?
    Building any raised crosswalk creates drainage problems. Since the NBC was redoing the sewers and rebuilding the streets, they could pre-grade the streets to handle the runoff from the five they were agreeing to do.
  4. But it’s possible to build the crosswalk, right?
    Yes. Provided someone does the study and it doesn’t cost too much to fix the drainage problem.
  5. Does the City of Providence have money for this?
    Probably. There are some federal funds and some neighborhood funds that might be available.
  6. Would the city look into this?
    Yes.
  7. What’s the deadline?
    Before Christmas. If the City conducts the study and finds the funds and informs the Narragansett Bay Commission, they can write it into the contract with their construction firm and make it happen.

On the way out of the meeting, I explained this to Councilman Jackson. The architect joked that this was the first meeting he’d ever been to where people actually wanted more construction.

There oughtn’t to be a law…

In both of these stories, both the problem and solution were in the same geography. One woman’s answer was a block away or a FaceBook group away. One sidewalk’s answer was in the same room, just missing someone to rethink the problem.

Did the “politician” solve either problem? No. Someone else will have to follow-up and make sure that the solution is implemented.

What I did was create opportunities for these problems to be solved without raising taxes, levying fines or writing legislation. No closed door meetings or back room deals either.

Not a bad few days.

———–

*Campaign bank accounts can be used to make donations to non-profits, something I’ve already promised to do with the whatever small funds are left in my account after the election.