Sierra Club endorses 17 candidates for legislature


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

RI Sierra Club Logo QuahogThe RI Chapter of the Sierra Club has endorsed 17 legislative candidates – 12 running for a seat in the House of Representatives and 5 running for Senate seats.

“Our political committee based these decisions on a shared questionnaire with Clean Water Action, sent to every candidate, that focused heavily on what the two groups see as the top challenges and goals of the upcoming legislative season,” according to a news release from the Sierra Club. “The candidates below are the ones the Sierra Club believes are both willing and capable of creating a truly resilient, renewable and environmentally responsible Rhode Island.”

The Sierra Club said it will be “adding more endorsements in the days to come for those unopposed or facing/ posing a November challenge. The below list of endorsements is specifically focused on the candidates involved in races we have determined to be key primaries.”

Representative in General Assembly
Moira Walsh, District 3  – Providence
Marcia Ranglin-Vassell, District 5  – Providence
Grace Diaz, District 11 – Providence
Lisa Scorpio, District 13 – Johnston/Providence
Nicholas Delmenico, District 27 – Coventry/Warwick/West Warwick
Teresa Tanzi, District 34 – Narragansett/South Kingstown
Kathleen Fogarty, District 35 – South Kingstown
William Deware, District 54 – North Providence
David Norton, District 60 – Pawtucket
Jason Knight, District 67 – Barrington/Warren
Susan Donovan, District 69 – Bristol/Portsmouth
Linda Finn, District 72 – Middletown/Newport/Portsmouth

Senator in General Assembly
Doris De Los Santos, District 7 – Providence/North Providence
Matt Fecteau, District 8 – Pawtucket
Daniel Issa, District 16 – Central Falls/Pawtucket
Dennis Lavallee, District 17 – Lincoln/North Providence/North Smithfield
Jeanine Calkin, District 30 – Warwick

Sierra Club mobilizes to prevent veto of Keable/Fogarty power plant bill


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Raimondo
Gina Raimondo

The Rhode Island Chapter of the Sierra Club has sent an email to their subscribers asking them to call Governor Gina Raimondo and urge her not to veto the Keable/Fogarty bill that will allow Burrillville voters to vote on any tax agreements their Town Council makes with Invenergy for the proposed fracked gas and diesel oil burning power plant in Pascoag.

The Sierra Club has “made it our top priority to fight the proposed billion dollar fracked gas and oil power plant that a major corporation wants to build in the beautiful town of Burrillville, Rhode Island.”

Here’s the good news: there is legislation making its way through the General Assembly that could stop this insane new plant. In fact, a bill by Rep. Keable and Sen. Fogarty that would give the town of Burrillville the authority to hold a local referendum on the proposal is looking likely to pass both the House and the Senate!

Now here’s the bad news: Governor Raimondo is a big supporter of the power plant, and she has threatened to veto this legislation.

The email goes on to say, “Make no mistake, a veto by the governor would be a betrayal of everyone who cares about our planet, and of future generations of Rhode Islanders. It would represent a suicidal double-down on the dangerous fossil fuel economy that has taken our climate to the brink and that promises so much more destruction in coming years.”

The email conatins a handy button to contact the Governor, reproduced here:

You can also reach her office can be reach by phone at (401) 222-2080, by email at governor@governor.ri.gov, and online here. The Sierra Club asks that callers please repeat this message, as loud and clear as you can:

Governor, I urge you to stand by your campaign commitment to fight climate change. Please do not veto the Keable/Fogarty legislation to give local voters a say in this massive new fossil fuel investment. This decision will define your environmental legacy – I hope you make the right choice, for the sake of our children, grandchildren, and all future generations of Rhode Islanders.

Representative Aaron Regunberg, a co-sponsor of the bill in the House, echoed the Sierra Club ask but also wrote in an email to his constituents that,

“There are a lot of good people in the building trades who support this proposal, and I feel for them – they need work, and they see this project as their best chance to support their families. That’s why I also commit to fighting – just as hard – for a renewable energy agenda that will create good, family-supporting jobs for folks who need them. We know it’s possible, and I’m ready for the fight.”

RI Sierra Club stands with striking Verizon Workers


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

2016-04-13 Verizon 001The Sierra Club’s ally the Communications Workers of America (CWA) is currently on strike against Verizon and Verizon Wireless (Verizon) in 9 northeast and mid-Atlantic states, including Rhode Island, after contract negotiations broke down. (The other states are MA, NY, NJ, PA, MD, DE, DC and VA). CWA members have been critical allies to the Sierra Club on issues ranging from democracy to trade to climate disruption. Now it is our turn to stand up for them.

While Verizon employees are struggling for fair jobs, communities from Baltimore to Appalachia are struggling to transition to the 21st-century clean energy economy without access to high-speed internet due to Verizon’s neglect. This denial of access to an essential tool of the 21st century economy is a prime example of the links between environmental and economic injustice.

Verizon has been raking in billions of dollars of profits every year, yet they are still trying to outsource good union jobs, transfer technicians away from their homes for months at a time, take away employees’ health benefits and avoid paying federal income tax. At the same time, they are still refusing to expand their FiOS high-speed internet to low-income and communities of color, despite getting tax breaks and subsidies to do so. To make matters worse, Verizon is refusing to sit down and negotiate a fair contract with its employees.

In negotiations over their union contract, Verizon employees are coming together to fight the outsourcing of their union jobs and to make sure that everyone has access to quality service. If Verizon employees lose this round of contract negotiations, other companies will see that they too can get away with shoddy service, offshoring jobs, contracting out work, and poor treatment of their employees.

We must ensure that our friends and neighbors have jobs that sustain their families and bolsters the economy in Rhode Island. For good jobs and a just transition, Sierra Club stands in solidarity with Verizon workers.

[From a press release]

Fossil Free RI statement on Invenergy power plant hearing


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Fossil Free RIAt its public meeting today, the Rhode Island Energy Facility Siting Board postponed ruling on giving grassroots groups and individuals the opportunity to get a fair hearing of their objections to the Clear River Energy Center, a fracked-gas power plant proposed by Invenergy, based in Chicago, IL.  The board will announce its final ruling on this matter at the next public hearing, scheduled for January 29.

The two remaining members of the three who should make up the board serve at the pleasure of Governor Raimondo, who is on record supporting expansion of the “natural” gas infrastructure. As a result, Janet Coit, one of the two board members, is in a bind.  She is Director of the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management and an avid environmentalist.  Last summer, she spoke at the Sierra Club-sponsored rally, “The Environment is Everyone’s Business.”  Coit is painfully aware of the toll climate change is already taking on life in Narragansett Bay.  At the rally, she referred to a “profound experience” she had looking at colonial nesting birds on Hope Island. She said: “There are several islands in the Bay that used to host colonies of nesting terns and now they are submerged.”

Said Lisa Petrie of Fossil Free Rhode Island: “We’re calling on Governor Raimondo to wake up and recognize that building more gas-fired power plants threatens the future of our state and of humanity as a whole.”  Indeed, the Invenergy proposal is inconsistent with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s 2009 Endangerment Finding, which determined that greenhouse gas emissions endanger public health and welfare of current and future generations.  This language parallels that of the 2007 denial of a fossil-fuel plant permit by Roderick Brembly, Secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment. Obviously, team Raimondo is lagging reality by almost a decade.

Fossil Free Rhode Island reiterated that Governor Raimondo’s policies violate Article 1, Section 17 of the Rhode Island Constitution, the supreme law of the state, which clearly specifies the duty “to provide for the conservation of the air, land, water, plant, animal, mineral and other natural resources of the state.”

The Conservation Law Foundation has put forth that, by increasing Rhode Island’s greenhouse gas emissions, the Clear River Energy Center would violate the Resilient Rhode Island Act of 2014. The foundation urged the Board to terminate its deliberations, which would effectively deny Invenergy the permit it seeks.

The Burrillville Land Trust, in a blistering take down of Invenergy’s proposal, argued for the same and writes: “We are being denied an opportunity to respond in a meaningful way because of mis-information, inadequate information and outright absence of information.”

Governor Raimondo has tried to make the case that Invenergy’s Energy Center will bring jobs to Rhode Island.  The Rhode Island Building and Construction Trades Council, in its request for late intervention, agrees with the governor. This view is untenable and Fossil Free Rhode Island referred to a recent report of the Political Economy Research Institute of UMass in Amherst that states: “New investments in energy efficiency and renewable energy will generate more jobs for a given amount of spending than maintaining or expanding each country’s existing fossil fuel sectors.”

Fossil Free Rhode Island once again drew attention to current research that shows that, given the urgency of dealing with climate change, “natural” gas has a larger greenhouse gas footprint than coal and oil. In other words, Invenergy’s proposed power plant is bad for Rhode Island on all counts: physics, economics and morality.

Sister Mary Pendergast, one of the individual intervenors, said: “I do not think that the spiritual and moral issues of environmental ethics will be adequately represented by excluding my testimony. Any decision the Siting Board makes that is good for the corporation, but not for the environment, is a bad decision and we will live to regret it.”

The Board referred to the ambiguous rules under which they operate.  They seem to interpret the rules as the requirement of attorney representation. This interpretation would exclude virtually all members of the public who filed for the status of intervenor.  Pat Fontes, representing Occupy Providence, said: “The refusal to admit the voice of Occupy Providence in the deliberations of this board would symbolize and contribute to the likelihood that ‘government of the people, by the people, and for the people’ will indeed perish from the earth.”

[From a press release]

RI Future covered the hearing here: Strong public opposition to Burrillville power plant at hearing

Protestors combat fracking in Rhode Island with Burriville power plant


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

After a fittingly stormy Tuesday morning, Governor Gina Raimondo announced a controversial plan at the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce to open a natural gas power plant in Burriville amid environmental protests and citizen complaints.

Protestors rally in front of Providence Chamber of Commerce as Gov. Raimondo announces Clear River Energy Center
Protestors rally in front of Providence Chamber of Commerce as Gov. Raimondo announces Clear River Energy Center

The plant, called the Clear River Energy Center, would utilize fracking to generate energy with natural gas. Fracking is a process that involves drilling into the earth, and then shooting a high-pressure water mixture at the rock to release the natural gas inside. Environmentalists have opposed the practice for a number of reasons. First, the process uses huge amounts of water that must be transported to the site. Second, many worry that dangerous chemicals used in the process may contaminate groundwater around the site. There are also concerns that fracking causes small earthquakes.

The company that is sponsoring and privately funding the $700 million project, Invenergy, says that the practice is clean and environmentally friendly because the new plant will prevent older, less efficient plants from emitting pollutants like carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and sulphur oxides into the air.

Invenergy has predicted $280 million in energy savings for Rhode Islanders once the energy center is up and running. There would be an overall economic impact of $1.3 billion between 2016 and 2034. Roughly 300 construction jobs would be added to the state’s workforce to build the facility, over a 30 month time period. There would also be 25-30 permanent, skilled positions to actually run the center.

“The construction of this clean energy generation facility will create hundreds of jobs while delivering more affordable and reliable energy to our businesses and homes,” Governor Raimondo said. “We are tackling our regional energy challenges, committing to cleaner energy systems in the long-term, and putting Rhode Islanders back to work.”

Even with this promise of clean energy, there are still many staunch opponents to the proposed facility. Fighting Against Natural Gas, or FANG, held an emergency rally in front of the Chamber of Commerce as Governor Raimondo unveiled her plan. Some even believed the facility to be a “rape” of Burriville’s air, water, and soil.

Robert Malin from Rhode Island’s chapter of the Sierra Club attended the protest, in opposition to the proposed facility. Malin believes that the government has been less than forthcoming with details for the project, and shouldn’t be trusted.

More protestors rallying against Burriville fracking.
More protestors rallying against Burriville fracking.

“The Governor has been saying that she doesn’t know anything about gas or fracking, and that this whole thing is just one little expansion that they’re doing, and by the way, we don’t have any money to build out the renewables, it’s a wish. Maybe in 20 years we’ll get around to actually doing it,” he said. “Then the next thing you know, they can dig into their pockets, they can pull out $700 million, and this thing that they’re planning, had to be planned in advance. They kept this whole thing under the table. Why wasn’t the public able to decide whether we want an explosive power plant building, bringing fracked gas, a deadly practice that was outlawed in New York state, that’s what we’re bringing.”

Malin explained that even though many don’t consider natural gas a fossil fuel, believing it lacks a carbon footprint, the energy source actually leaves what he called a “ghost footprint,” and still contributes to global warming.

“You’re trying to track a colorless, odorless gas,” he said. “Unfortunately, when it gets into the atmosphere, it’s called an accelerant to global warming. So, if you can imagine, you’ve got a big wood fire, and you take some gasoline and throw it on the fire. It flares up really quick. So if you’re not right there when you’re measuring it, when it flares up, then it’s very hard to track. The bad new is that it has the same carbon footprint as other fossil fuels, like coal and oil when it’s done.”

Stephen Dahl, from Fossil Free Rhode Island, said that Raimondo’s plan is short term, and that there are better options and avenues for the state to undertake.

“I think that is a very short gain that they are playing. In the short term, we’ll have jobs. For the longer term, if we follow countries like Germany and Scandinavia, and their mix of energies, in which we can build a transition to 100 percent wind, water, and solar for all purposes, both residential and commercial, here in Rhode Island, by 2050,” he said. “I understand that she has a limited term in office, and she wants to get something done. The way she’s chosen forward, though, is unfortunately, that short-term prospect, which will bring us more catastrophes. So, I object to it.”

Raimondo, and Invenergy’s Founder and CEO Michael Polsky both insisted that fracking, in combination with renewable energy sources, is only one of many puzzle pieces that can be put together to help slow climate change. According to Invenergy, the Clear River Energy Center will add more than 900 megawatts of new, cleaner energy to the regional energy grid, and will displace older, less efficient plants. It will also invest in well treatment and system upgrades, which will benefit 1,200 Pascoag Utility District water customers by contracting on a long-term basis for industrial water supply. Commercial benefits for the town of Burriville include millions of dollars in tax revenue, as well as the reduction of the property tax burden for homeowners.

Once approved, the Clear River Energy Center will begin construction in 2016, with operations scheduled to begin by summer 2019.

Why the left should embrace a ConCon


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
ri constitutionSome progressive groups and labor unions are actively opposing holding a constitutional convention. Indeed, I just got a letter for the head of the RI Federation of Teachers to that effect. It seems there was no rank and file input into that decision. Similarly as a member I had no input into the ACLU decision to oppose.
This is a disappointment, as Rhode Island is not doing that well, especially for working people, and much of the public is cynical about government, disengaged from civic activity and the political process. This is not in our interest as ultimately we need a more positive attitude to get the public support needed for government programs.
A constitutional convention can address this by reforms getting at the who-you-know insider system, Assembly procedures allowing midnight sessions with rules suspended, judicial selection abuse, 38 Studios type end runs around voters, fair redistricting, campaign finance, ethical requirements on legislators. It can build democracy, especially if voter initiative is approved, as it almost was the last time. The RI Sierra Club chapter had supported VI because of our experience elsewhere where it was used to pass environmental legislation, including CA coastal protection that real estate interests had blocked in their Assembly, and “bottle bills” blocked here by the throwaway industries. Indeed much of the energy these day on voter initiative is in the progressive direction, raising minimum wages, paid sick days, labeling GMO food, repealing anti-labor laws, expanding a bottle bill, but many of our progressives seem not to have caught up with that.
Civil rights is a legit concern, but I see little threat voters will restrict the rights of minorities in RI. MA is similar to RI but though they have voter initiative, this has not been a problem. Indeed a constitutional convention or VI could EXPAND rights such as the right to privacy, rights of the terminally ill, rights of children to an adequate education (recently ruled not now a constitutional right,) the right to vote, maybe even improved rights to shoreline access.
As for reproductive freedom, it is a big factor in my support for a con-con in hopes of getting Voter Initiative which of course the Assembly would never voluntarily give up any power and allow. Think ahead. If the GOP wins the next election, a shift of 1 US Supreme Court justice could overturn Roe v Wade, not an unlikely prospect. What are our prospects in the Assembly then, especially with Mattiello and Paiva-Weed in charge? Very low. Pro-choice people would be much better off with the voters, but without VI we’d have no recourse.
I think it would damage the union movement and the progressive community if they are seen as being afraid of the people voting, especially as Rhode Island voters consistently support infrastructure, transit, and public higher education investments, facilities for veterans and the disabled, and environmental protection, even voting pro-choice when that was once on the ballot. We have a small progressive group, Just Reform RI, that is advocating for the constitutional convention, we are developing a website www.justreformri.org and a “civil rights pledge” asking candidates for any convention to sign pledging not to reduce the civil rights of anyone. Please consider meeting with us as appropriate. Lets give democracy a chance!
Barry Schiller

Notes from the People’s Climate March


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

13sep21_pcm_42ndst

Four solid miles of people — 400,000, according to organizers — marched through the heart of New York City to show that climate change is no longer an abstract threat, and to demand action from national and international leaders.

They carried signs and banners, made music, rode bicycles, pushed kids in strollers, and made noise in a line so long that when lead contingent arrived at 34th Street and 11th Avenue, the tail of the march had just begun to move from 86th Street and Central Park West. It made the usual crush of people in Midtown Manhattan seem sparse by comparison. Imagine roughly half of the people in the state of Rhode Island marching together.

There were plenty of Rhode Islanders there, including a half-dozen busses with folks from groups including the RI Sierra Club, Fossil Free RI, the RI Progressive Democrats of America, the Humanists of RI. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse was in the march, we spotted him as he stopped to talk with students from Brown and URI.

The march was timed to coincide with Tuesday’s UN Climate Summit, which aims to build international support for action before the next round of climate talks, and in an unusual move, Secretary General Ban Ki Moon himself joined the marchers. RI Future caught up with former Vice-President Al Gore, and he expressed his hopes for action at the Summit.

The People’s Climate March was grouped into six sections, who each had a several-block stretch of Central Park West where they began marshaling early this morning. The weather had been predicted hot, but an overnight rain left the streets cool and damp when people began assembling around 8am. Leading the march at Columbus Circle (an irony acknowledged by the organizers) were the people on the “Frontlines of Crisis” — indigenous people, climate justice groups, and impacted communities. Next was “We can build the future,” comprising labor, families, students, and elders. Following them was the “We have solutions group,” with renewable energy people, food and water justice groups, and environmental organizations. Then came “we know who is responsible,” with anti-corporate campaigns, peace & justice groups, and others. After them — and we were up to 81st street now — was “The debate is over,” featuring scientists and interfaith organizations. Finally, the last group, “To change everything, we need everyone,” included NY boroughs, community groups, neighborhoods, other cities, states, and countries.

Each section had its own floats, banners, and themed signs, and each began the morning with a mini-rally at the head of their staging area. Not only was the street packed, solid, for those twenty blocks, but the sidewalks on both sides and slowed to a crawl as people moved up and down the line to find their contingent.

Sallie LatchThe tone, energized and upbeat throughout was notable. There was definitely plenty of anger — at corporations, at international leaders, at the system — but from the youth contingent near the front enthusiastically chanting “This is what democracy looks like” to the many folks who had clearly been at this for a while, there was a positive energy.

Sallie Latch, with the group globaljusticecenter.org, held a sign on 81st Street saying “I can’t believe I’m protesting this crap after 60 years.” Smiling, she told RI Future, “More than 60 years. We need to do something. We can’t wait for our politicians and corporations. This is about system change, not climate change.”

Although the march stepped off on time, it still took hours for those in the final groups to begin to move, as the line snaked across 59th Street, down 6th Ave, then across 42nd to 11th Avenue, where they headed south to a post-march celebration/block party between 34th and 37th. This reporter had walked north along the entire staging area to get a sense of the groups (see the photos on Flickr) and was able to catch the subway and get to Times Square in time to meet the frontline group headed West on 42nd Street.

The final marchers made their way along the west side about six hours after the event began. This reporter grew up in NY, and cannot recall seeing anything with this scale since the anti-nuclear protest back in 1982.

NY Climate Convergence conference attacks roots of climate struggle


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Jill Stein speaks to attendees at the Converge for Climate conference, St. Peter's church, NYC
Jill Stein speaks to attendees at the Converge for Climate conference, St. Peter’s church, NYC

With a display of the full-throated, unabashedly leftist critique usually absent from American policy discussions, the NYC Climate Convergence conference kicked off last night at St. Peter’s Church in Midtown Manhattan with a diverse lineup of speakers who all sought to reframe climate change as a social justice issue. Through the two hours of talks — which often prompted prolonged applause from the more than 300 attendees in the hall and a video overflow room — ran a deceptively simple theme: “System change, not climate change.”

“We need to connect the dots,” said Jill Stein, the 2012 Green Party presidential candidate, who served as emcee and introduced the five speakers. It is impossible, Stein argued, to address climate change within a context of neoliberal capitalism and unfettered corporate self-interest, but that through building a collective, human-focussed movement change is possible. “The moment we get together we are an unstoppable force. The name of the game is coming together and overcoming this framing of divide and conquer.”

That’s the aim of Climate Convergence, which has leveraged the People’s Climate March on Saturday to bring together hundreds of scholars, unionists, artists and activists from around the world for a two-day series or talks and workshops exploring how communities around the world are building transformative alternatives and, according to their web site [convergeforclimate.org], to “build and strengthen an environmental movement that addresses the root causes of the climate crisis.”

The evening began with an introduction by the Indigenous Environmental Network and a blessing delivered by water walker Josephine Mandamin, who focused on the link between the water she ceremonially carries and the health of the Earth. “One day, the earth will be clean,” she said. “This is the work that has been left for us to do.” The climate comprises every drop of water, and, “That little droplet of water unites us all.”

Ann Petermann of the Global Justice Ecology Project stepped through the history of failed efforts of previous United Nations conferences to achieve meaningful international agreements. Outside pressure, she argued, was the only way to push for change. “I’m very excited about what’s going to be happening this week around the UN Summit,” she said, citing the Flood Wall Street action planned for Monday. “Direct action is the antidote for despair.”

Immortal Technique (Felipe Coronel)
Immortal Technique (Felipe Coronel)

Hip-hop artist Immortal Technique (Felipe Coronel) talked about his personal journey from Peru to Harlem, and the critical need to be “proactive in our progressiveness” across all the intersectional oppressions that contribute to climate change. “We are human beings who have been conditioned to believe in a non-sustainable system,” he said, “The people who are ruining our planet are not going to be the people who fix it.” He closed with a devastating rap, “Sign of the Times.”

Erica Violet Lee of Idle No More stressed the very direct threat to indigenous people from tar sands work in Canada. “To get to the oil-rich lands, they need to move our families out of the way,” she said. “The intent of Idle No More is to draw awareness to the legacy of colonial and paternalistic policies.”

Nastaran Mohit
Nastaran Mohit

Nastaran Mohit, a New York labor organizer, challenged attendees to move beyond conferences and marches, and drew pointed illustrations from her work with the people of the Rockaways, an 11-mile long peninsula in Queens devastated by Hurricane Sandy. “Some of the poorest neighborhoods in New York City had the roofs ripped off them,” she said. “Sandy was the first time that Occupy activists had the opportunity to connect with low-income and marginalized communities. As beautiful a movement as Occupy was, it lacked that connection.” She described the difficult, sometimes painful work that volunteers had to do.

“As a labor organizer,” she said, “I look at unions. The New York State Nurses Association sent out hundreds of volunteers, canvassed hi-rise buildings, met some of the most frightened residents. What those nurses came back from that experience knowing, they saw first-hand how frightening it is when a climate catastrophe hits New York.”

“What did you do to help?” She asked attendees; not, she said, to induce guilt, but to prompt consideration of what meaningful action requires. “Am I willing to be uncomfortable? Am I willing to really go out and connect with these folks who are on the front lines of climate change?”

Oscar Olivera
Oscar Olivera

The evening’s final speaker, Oscar Olivera, talked about the work which won him the 2001 Goldman Environmental Prize: building a coalition which successfully overturned the privatization of water distribution in Cochabamba, Bolivia’s third-largest city. He drew a parallel to the United States: “Cochabamba is in Detroit right now.”

There are two interlinked challenges, Olivera said, communication and organization. “When the water was privatized,” he said, “There was a law, there was a contract, and the people did not understand anything. Our biggest challenge was how do we make this technical economic language simple for people to grasp.” Second, he said, “We have to have new means of organizing against that whole cadre of business that are threatening our environment. The only way to prove to those in power that we exist, the only way they will understand us is by mobilizing.”

In Cochabamba, he said, “We didn’t just recover water as a public good, we recovered politics, and for us, politics means our collective capacity to make decisions for today and the future.”

He urged attendees to recognize their responsibility, as people from the North who maintain the largest military, the largest transnational corporations, and the highest consumption. He closed by asking attendees to “Commit not only to resist, but to re-exist.” “We pledge to be like water, transparent and in movement,” he said. “We promise to be like children, joyful and creative. We promise to believe that the power is within us — without leaders, without parties, without bosses. Hasta la victoria.”

After the event, a group from FloodWallStreet.org conducted a training outside the church for a group of about 30 activist volunteers for a direct action that will take place on Monday morning at the New York Stock Exchange. Aiming to spotlight the threat to Lower Manhattan from climate change, the group plans to dress in blue and mimic the flooding that crippled the area in the wake of Sandy. Watching the volunteers “Surge and sit” offered an eerie, powerful echo of Olivera’s call to “be like water.”

Flood Wall Street activists train volunteers outside the Converge for Climate Conference
Flood Wall Street activists train volunteers outside the Converge for Climate Conference

Be the ‘Disruption’


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Whitehouse PCM ThumbnailIt was a beautiful day yesterday (unless you’re a die-hard Pats fan), not the kind of day you want to spend inside. Nevertheless, I found myself in a darkened classroom at Brown University in order to watch “Disruption,” a documentary that dropped online yesterday and which is designed to drive people into the streets to demand action on the climate. The film gave me goosebumps several times, both anticipating the impending People’s Climate March in NYC on September 21st and reminiscing about the giant Forward on Climate Rally in DC last February. It runs a little over 50 minutes, and it makes a compelling case for people to show up in New York. [stream it here]

Did I mention you can get a Climate March bus ticket roundtrip for as little as $15 and the deadline is Wednesday? CLICK HERE FOR THE TICKET PAGE  (If it says the tickets are sold out, please join the waiting list. More buses are being arranged)

The People’s Climate March is expected to draw more than 200,000 people, all to make the statement that global action must be undertaken to drastically reduce carbon emissions. The film builds excitement for the march by interlacing behind the scenes clips of the amazing organizing work being done to make it all run smoothly with interviews of renowned climate activists. The organizers’ perspective on the march is reinforced by periodically counting down the days until September 21st, beginning 100 days out and ending with 14 to go.

One of the renowned activists who makes an appearance in “Disruption” is our own Senator Whitehouse. The Senator held his annual Energy and Environmental Leaders day, and we were able to pull him aside for a moment to get an exclusive video interview. Among other things we asked him why it’s important to go down to New York City. This is what he had to say:

Even if you know you can’t make it to the People’s Climate March and disregard the Senator’s invitation, I recommend watching the movie to get a sense of the scale of the movement we need to create in the coming decades in order to save civilization as we have known it. It requires unprecedented action, and it’s made more difficult by human psychology, which isn’t biologically designed to grapple with problems that emerge and must be resolved over generations. This challenge is acknowledged in “Disruption.” The theory in the film and behind the march itself is to get enough people onto the streets to reach a cultural tipping point, to find a place in our collective consciousness where we can plan for the long term and act accordingly.

We are closer to this tipping point than we realize, and each new pair of boots on the ground brings us a step closer. In New York and beyond, if we want to disrupt business as usual, we must be the disruption.

Buy Your Ticket Now!

 

‘Disruption’ at URI


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

disruption_poster_exportJoin us for a screening of ‘Disruption’, a fast-paced, cinematic journey through the wild world of climate change: the science, the politics, the solutions, and the stories that define the crisis at this critical point in the history of Earth.

The movie is close to an hour long, and afterward, we’ll have a discussion about what all of us can do together about this crucial issue.

The screening will prepare the way for the People’s Climate March in New York City on September 21st, when a vast quantity of people will converge in New York City for what may become the largest climate march in history to date. As we march, reported world leaders will be attending the UN for a special summit on the climate crisis.

URI students will join with people from other schools, community organizations, unions and hundreds of other groups from across the country and around the world for this historic occasion. We’ll take to the streets to demand the the climate justice that is within our reach.

There will be buses departing from Kingston and Providence to New York City on September 20th (Providence only) and 21st, and returning on Sunday, the 21st.

Tickets will be $30 round trip, with low-income tickets available for $15. You can purchase your bus tickets here.

There also is an RI site for donations.

Please fill out this interest form if you are planning on attending the People’s Climate March.

The screening of Disruption is sponsored by:

Finally, here Sophie Robinson explains what motivates her to organize for the People’s Climate March:

… the worst fear

That can ever be hurled

Fear to bring children

Into the world

(Bob Dylan’s Masters of War)

Senate President Paiva Weed wins Sierra Club endorsement


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

paiva weed ft adamsThe environment has a friend in Senate President Teresa Paiva Weed, who again earned the endorsement of the local Sierra Club chapter this campaign season. The state’s highest ranking senator who represents Newport and Jamestown has won the Sierra Club’s support going back to at least 2006.

“I sought out the Sierra Club’s endorsement because I have great respect for them as an organization,” she told me. “Anyone who crosses the Newport Bridge as often as I do can’t help but take in the beauty of Narragansett Bay and realize how important of an asset it is to our state.”

Paiva Weed has a mixed record on progressive issues – she was a holdout on same sex marriage but has pushed hard to fight poverty. She’s never been wavering on her commitment to environmental causes though, including habitat restoration efforts and growing green jobs. This past year she was an early and ardent supporter of the recently-enacted Resilient RI climate change bill that will help the state prepare for rising sea levels, super storms and other climate change impacts.

Rober Malin, political chair of the Sierra Club said she obviously knows her stuff.

“The endorsement committee was impressed that Teresa Paiva-Weed displayed a depth of knowledge about environmental issues when answering our questions and has been outspoken in her views on the importance of dealing with climate change,” he said. “In the interview it was clear that she is someone who understands that prioritizing this problem is essential to Rhode Island’s economic future.”

Paiva Weed said she thinks coastal communities like the ones she represents have shown a stronger commitment to addressing climate change and a clean environment. “Often it’s more of a priority for those of us from coastal communities than those from urban districts,” she said.

RI, others to EPA: make Midwest, South stop polluting Northeast


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

air pollutionRhode Island, and seven other nearby states, have formerly asked the EPA to require nine Midwestern and Southern states to do a better job mitigating the air pollution caused by fossil fuel industries because it affects air quality here in he northeast.

“Our goal is to eliminate Ozone Alert Days in Rhode Island,” said Governor Chafee in a statement. “Rhode Islanders still face bad air days each and every summer because of air pollutants from upwind states. Stronger controls, including the expansion of the Ozone Transport Region, are needed to level the playing field and improve air quality in downwind states such as Rhode Island.”

The eight states petitioning the EPA are: Rhode Island, Vermont, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland and New York. The states being asked to regulate carbon pollution in the atmosphere better are: Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia.

The EPA will rule on whether to approve the tougher regulations for the nine Midwestern and Southern states.

According to a news release from the governor’s office, anywhere form 70 to 98 percent of ozone pollution comes from such upwind states.

Abel Collins, program director for the Sierra Club said:

We applaud Governor Chafee for working to protect the health of Rhode Island families from out-of-state pollution. We are confident this is a sign that the Governor plans to take similar action to promote renewable energy locally to reduce the demand for dirty energy.

Environmental Protection Agency data shows that in many parts of Eastern states, like Rhode Island, more than half the harmful smog and air pollution associated with coal plants originates from out of state. By working together to protect our families from out-of-state pollution, these eight Governors are showing a commitment to public health and a readiness to lead our nation away from the dirty energy sources of the past toward a clean, renewable energy future.

As the cost of coal continues to rise, clean energy prices have become competitive and affordable, saving money for consumers. Governor Chafee can lead the way by acting to and invest in cleaner, healthier wind and solar power in New England.

Rhode Island Can Be Heroic On Climate Change


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

“By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail”~ Ben Franklin

Fourth Economy Consulting, a firm out of Pennsylvania hired as part of the federally funded “Sustainable RI” grant, recently submitted its preliminary report of the strengths and weaknesses of Rhode Island’s economy. The first recommendation in the report’s initial guidance section is to “Create One Voice–Set a Clear Course.” This idea is not new. In fact it’s been a common refrain in the state since before I started paying close attention to economic development policy. We need an identity that we can market to the world in order to draw and retain talented people to our workforce.

New York has finance, art, media, and fashion. Boston has education, bio-medical research, and healthcare. Thus these metropolises dominate the playing field of the “knowledge” economy that we are seeking to compete on, and our city-state isn’t even in the same league. How do we separate ourselves?

As much as I hear people talk about it, I don’t hear a lot of ideas about what our special brand is going to be. As an outsider, Fourth Economy wasn’t so bold as to suggest what our singular voice should be, but as one of those home grown young professionals the state is looking to keep, I will.

Here’s my thinking: for as far into the future as we can see, there are two storylines that dominate economic policy. On the one hand is the depletion of the natural resources we use to achieve our luxuriant civilization, and on the other, the related story of global warming. There will doubtless be other stories, but these two are as inevitable as death and taxes.

As a small state with nearly 500 miles of precious coastline and no fossil fuel deposits to speak of, we have a lot at stake in these stories. Sea level rise will affect us disproportionately harshly, and the laws of supply and demand will make any dependence on oil and other dirty fuels foolishly costly.

Fortunately, we can play the hero in both tales by transitioning from our current carbon intensive economy to a carbon neutral one. Our identity, our one-voice clear-course brand, can be the ecology economy.  This pragmatic transition will build a strong economy now and leave us with a resilient Rhode Island for the future of certain upheaval.

Let us emulate Sweden which aims to wean itself entirely from fossil fuels by 2020 or Norway which plans to be carbon neutral by 2030. Massachusetts and Connecticut have passed Climate Solutions Acts that have the goal of 80% reductions in emissions by 2050. We can up the ante. I bet we can reach 100% by 2050. Let’s leave our neighbors in the dust for once.

A list of specific prescriptions to kickstart our economic makeover might begin with:

  • Make the Rhode Climate Change Commission’s report “Adapting to Climate Change in the Ocean State: A Starting Point” required reading for policy makers from Town Hall to the State House. It will serve as a good planning document going forward.
  • Make major new investments in our public transit system (House bill 5073 is a start). Given our size and the distribution of our population, we could have the best bus system in the country. Adding a second hub in South County to create a circulator which doesn’t have to go to Providence would be pleasant and efficient. Also, let’s work with Massachusetts and the federal transportation authorities to let RIPTA  run service into southeastern Mass. Tell your Rep to invest in transit here.
  • Create incentives and opportunities for clean energy. Restoring the Renewable Energy Tax Credit (House Bill 5116, Senate Bill 127-Action Alert here) is a good way to revive the residential solar industry in RI. Currently installment of photovoltaics and solar hot water systems is limited to electricians and plumbers who are in short supply.  Creating a new licensed profession of solar installers would speed renewable development and create jobs. This industry presents opportunities for an apprenticeship program and the growth of local micro-financing.
  • Demand that the Economic Development Corporation embrace the opportunity of small scale agricultural business. We love visiting our local farms and eating our local food. Our tourists like it too. The EDC would do well to promote the “eco” in ecotourism.
  • Make Senator Reed’s Blackstone Valley National Park initiative happen!
  • Expedite the high speed rail, commuter rail, and large scale renewable projects in the works and bring the industry to supply their construction to Quonset.

Even these first steps toward an ecology economy will offer us handsome economic returns and leave us more competitive. Making them happen is more a matter of determination and commitment than large amounts of public money. As we shine more and more brightly in the new economy we will become a better place to live and work; as our name spreads far and wide as a beacon of hope we will attract more of what we want and need.

Luckily, everywhere you turn in Rhode Island you find politicians who are avowed environmentalists.  The Governor and those in the Congressional delegation can sell our new brand nationally and internationally.  We also have a public that grasps the challenges we face and that is eager to cheer these politicians on. With “one voice,” let’s declare that our economic failures are at an end. We will be prepared.

 

“This Op-ed first appeared in the Providence Journal on March 16, 2013. Many thanks to Bob Plain for reposting it here on RIfuture.”

Feb 17: Protest the Pipeline


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The environmental movement – and the planet it wants to protect – will come to a fork in the road on Feb. 17. Tens of thousands of people will descend on DC to demand that President Obama kill the Keystone Pipeline once and for all. And he might do it. On the other hand, he might not.

In the first instance, activists from around the country will rejoice and be energized to build the environmental movement necessary to win the fight of all our lives. In the latter, the environmental movement will have failed to stop a single project that in and of itself will ensure the release of enough carbon emissions that you can kiss goodbye any hope of preventing the worst climate scenarios [you know, the ones with at least 7 feet of sea level rise and billions dead from drought induced famine, heat waves, disease, and war caused by water scarcity] .  If that were to happen, it would leave the environmental movement in disarray.

February 17th will mark a pivotal moment in the history of the human race, and it is not at all clear which path Obama will point us down. One thing is sure though, the more people who turn out to be heard, the more likely it is that he will do the right thing.

Now, I know it’s not easy to go down to Washington. I mean it’s hard to cross the Pell Bridge, right?! Well, extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures, and I hope that you will join me and hundreds of other Rhode Islanders on February 17th in the Capitol.

If it makes the decision easier, you can get a round trip bus ticket for just $20.

Environmental Disobedience


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

For those of you trapped in caves, the weather has been getting unruly of late. 2012 was the latest in a long string of very hot years, the hottest on record in fact. It brought with it extreme drought, raging wildfires and Superstorm Sandy. The accumulated damage is still being tabulated but it will be in the hundreds of billions of dollars and countless lost lives. Climate scientists, conservative by nature and cowed by bombastic and well funded deniers, have finally grown so alarmed with the rapid progression of global warming that they are sticking their necks out and attributing the extreme weather to climate change.

Hallelujah! Now armed with overwhelming science and growing public support, it’s time for environmentalists (by which I mean everyone who would like to have a habitable planet) to get unruly, too. That appears to be the rationale behind my employer the Sierra Club’s recent decision to endorse civil disobedience for the first time in its 120 year history. As our national executive director Michael Brune says in his recent “From Walden to the White House” letter:

“For civil disobedience to be justified, something must be so wrong that it compels the strongest defensible protest. Such a protest, if rendered thoughtfully and peacefully, is in fact a profound act of patriotism. For Thoreau, the wrongs were slavery and the invasion of Mexico. For Martin Luther King, Jr., it was the brutal, institutionalized racism of the Jim Crow South. For us, it is the possibility that the United States might surrender any hope of stabilizing our planet’s climate…

We are watching a global crisis unfold before our eyes, and to stand aside and let it happen — even though we know how to stop it — would be unconscionable. As the president said on Monday, “to do so would betray our children and future generations.”  It couldn’t be simpler: Either we leave at least two-thirds of the known fossil fuel reserves in the ground, or we destroy our planet as we know it. That’s our choice, if you can call it that.”

Fight, or resign ourselves to a climate that threatens civilization as we know it: it really isn’t much of a choice is it? Sierra Club and numerous other organizations have been using traditional grassroots and institutional advocacy for decades to fight climate change, and it hasn’t been enough. Others like Bill McKibben’s 35o.org and many individuals have already crossed the line of civil disobedience in the effort to save the planet. It’s about time we all stand as one and make it clear that our halfhearted and incremental progress in reducing greenhouse gas emissions is unacceptable.

With that in mind, let’s do it. On February 17th, there is a massive climate action rally planned and you’re invited. This will be the biggest such rally ever held and should draw more than 25,000 people to the White House to tell President Obama among other things that the Keystone XL Pipeline must not be allowed to proceed.

A bus or buses will be going down to D.C., cars full of people too. Can you make it? You can pledge your attendance and find out more information on how to get down there by following this link.

Prospects Brighten for Transit Financing Fix


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Over the last 31 years, the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority (RIPTA) has come to the public 28 times to tell us of the need to either cut service or raise fares, sometimes both. Last summer RIPTA proposed a 10% service reduction in the face of a 4.6 million dollar deficit. While RIPTA has been able to forestall such drastic cuts by finding internal efficiencies, negotiating with the Amalgamated Transit Union, and carrying forward a deficit of 1.7 million dollars into next year, nothing has yet been done to fix the source of RIPTA’s financing problems.

In fact, the projected deficit for 2013 is 8 million dollars, a significant deterioration in the authority’s finances.

The problem is that RIPTA derives the majority of its operating budget from proceeds of the gas tax, and the yield per penny of the gas tax continues to be in perennial decline as fuel prices increase and people drive less or buy more fuel-efficient vehicles. Of course, the sky rocketing fuel prices also put upward pressure on the operating budget, so RIPTA gets squeezed on both ends just as demand for public transit is highest.

Unsurprisingly, public transit advocates have long been trying to push legislative reform to either supplement the gas tax or switch to a different financing mechanism so that RIPTA can preserve and even expand service to meet growing demand. These efforts have not been rewarded, but there are reasons to believe 2012 will be the year that public transportation finally gets the support it needs. What makes this year different?

Three things:

1. With leadership from new board chairperson Warwick Mayor Scott Avedisian, RIPTA management and labor have put aside their differences and are putting forth a united effort to secure more funding.  The Board of Directors unanimously endorsed the Public Transit Investment Act at their last meeting, and Avedisian, RIPTA CEO Charles Odimgbe, and ATU local 618 President Paul “Fuzzy” Harrington have all been on message at the Statehouse. These circumstances stand in stark contrast to last year when RIPTA was noticeably absent on Smith Hill until the very end of the legislative session, and even then seemed unsure of what it was asking for.

2. For the first time, Rhode Island’s public transit riders have organized to advocate on their own behalf. RIPTA Riders, a grassroots group of more than 600 members that largely coalesced last summer during the service cut public hearing process, has brought an astounding amount of pressure to bear on state policy makers. The Save RIPTA petition that the group started now has more than 5000 names on it, including 28 members of the House. You can see and hear more about the RIPTA Riders story here.

3. Urgency. Staring at a minimum of a 9.7 million dollar deficit, the problem can no longer be avoided. If public transit does not get additional funding this session, there will be service cuts of at least 20% in the fall. Such cuts would be a serious blow to the fragile economy of the state, particularly with gas prices as high as they are. More than ever, Rhode Islanders need affordable and convenient access to transportation.

With RIPTA Riders, the traditional coalition of transit advocates, and RIPTA itself all pulling in the same direction at the right time, transit financing reform is finally getting serious attention. You can get on this bus, too. Please take a second to click on the petition link above and put your name on it, and once you’ve done that please also send your State Rep a letter asking them to support the Public Transit Investment Act.