House Republicans neglect justice, Tea Party even worse


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

th-5-2-400px“But woe to you Pharisees!
For you…neglect justice…”
Jesus (Luke 11:42)

The House is in crisis.

Favoring the wealthiest 0.2 percent, House Republicans would eliminate estate taxes, increasing deficits for a decade by $320 billion. Do families of megarich magnates, who own more than the bottom 90 percent, need charitable relief?

As for spending, Republicans’ 2015 House budget chops food stamps by $125 billion; cancels Pell Grants for many students; and block-grants Medicaid, cutting health care for the destitute.

Mainstream Republicans also oppose health coverage for 16 million new insureds; obstruct realistic laws reducing the annual carnage of 32,000 gun deaths; and reject crucial infrastructure repairs and jobs.

House Republicans neglect justice. They eagerly demolish both taxes and spending to benefit the uberwealthy—at everyone else’s expense.

The Tea Party believes these policies are not sufficiently strict. Jim Jordan of Ohio spearheaded the sequester’s automatic dire cutbacks—too large to execute—but enacted due to right-wing rigidity.

With a dysfunctional process, America’s AAA credit rating was downgraded, triggering historically high debt-servicing costs. Louisiana’s John Fleming contended, “If we miss the deadline it’s no big crisis. We can use it politically.”

Jordan organized some 40 iron-fisted Tea Party members into the “Freedom Caucus.” Their Dickensian proposals make establishment Republicans appear liberal.

Consider Louie Gohmert of Texas. He introduced a farm bill amendment to cut off food stamps for 47.6 million needing food—including 16 million children. Afflicting America’s most vulnerable, this survival-of-the-fittest mentality would deliver many diseases and death sentences.

Kansan Tim Huelskamp and numerous colleagues promote privatizing Medicare. This would boost premiums and co-pays considerably, eliminating coverage for millions.

Libertarian David Brat of Virginia advocates demolishing Social Security and Medicare, cutting benefits by two-thirds. He also justifies decimating education funds: “Socrates trained in Plato on a rock. How much did that cost?”

Instead of balancing national debt interest with the deficit—nearly achieved—Arizonan Matt Salmon joins many Tea Partyers who claim we must balance the budget. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner says this would “kill the economy.” This requires ripping apart America’s safety net, discarding all discretionary programs, and significantly reducing Social Security and Medicare. This crushing austerity also slams the brakes on the economy, substantially increasing unemployment.

Colorado’s Ken Buck wants to privatize the VA. After criticism, he denied favoring “fully privatizing” veterans’ health care. As to Medicare, Medicaid and ‘Obamacare,’ he states, “We need to let the market work, make people responsible for their own insurance…” Such free-market fundamentalism is despicable, denying health insurance to about 100 million seniors and indigents.

Some howled when Florida Democrat Alan Grayson depicted the Republican health plan for the uninsured who get sick: “Die quickly.” Actually, about 19,000 lives are saved annually by Obamacare, yet the Tea Party pushed for more than 50 votes to expunge this essential health care. They offer no bills to replace it.

Tea Party austerity neglects justice.

In a 2013 Mother Jones exposé, “Inside the Republican Suicide Machine,” author Tim Dickinson concludes, “[Tea Party] insurgents are championed by wealthy ideologues who simply seek to tear down government.”

Mainstream Republicans inflict austerity measures, but Tea Party austerity is even worse: Slashing taxes for the wealthy is combined with plundering programs affecting disabled, jobless, working-class and middle-class Americans. This poisonous plot would delight Ebenezer Scrooge.

So why don’t voters choose Democrats? In 2012, they did—by 1.4 million votes. The outcome: Republicans, 234 seats; Democrats, 201. The system is rigged. With gerrymandered districts, voters don’t choose politicians; politicians choose voters. Analyst Sam Wang calculated that to control the House, Democrats needed to win by seven, not 1.2, percentage points.

Democracy is defeated. Austerity adored. Justice neglected—as the Tea Party worships the wealthy.

The House crisis is deeply rooted. It may require several election cycles but, with passionate resistance, perhaps our nation will yet overcome Tea Party tyranny.

Rev. Harry Rix is a retired pastor and mental health counselor living in Providence, RI. He has 50 articles on spirituality and ethics, stunning photos, and 1200 inspiring quotations available at www.quoflections.org.

Progressive Dems call out conservative Warwick mayoral candidate


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

What was supposed to be a casual meet and greet for the Warwick Progressive Democrats quickly went downhill when Sam Bell, the state coordinator for the Rhode Island Progressive Democrats, called out Democratic Warwick mayoral candidate Richard Corrente’s merits, saying that he’s an embarrassment to the party.

Photo courtesy of http://correntemayorwarwick.com/about-richard/
Photo courtesy of http://correntemayorwarwick.com/about-richard/

Corrente’s campaign has been an all around unorthodox one. He began campaigning for mayor last December, with almost two years until the next election. Corrente has also released a publication called “Warwick Taxpayers News,” which some believe suggest that he may align more with the Tea Party, rather than the Democratic party. The first page reads that Warwick is “Taxed Enough Already,” stylized to spell out the word “TEA.”

His main objection to current Mayor Scott Avedisian’s administration is that he has raised taxes every year for the past 15 years. Because of this, Corrente said, Warwick has lost 5,800 taxpayers in the last ten years, and has closed 4,666 businesses.

“If we keep going the way we’re going, we’re going to be a ghost town in six or seven years,” he said. “I disagree with that. I don’t think that’s the way it should be. I want to cut taxes, I want to cut spending, and I want to repopulate the city of Warwick so that we don’t have 9,000 people in our schools when we used to have 19,000.”

Corrente is dedicated on running for the Democratic ticket, even though some doubt that he’s actually a Democrat, and would effectively represent the party.

“We need to elect a mayor of Warwick who is a Democrat, […] but it’s important that Warwick have a Democratic mayor, and a Democratic mayor who cares for Democratic values,” Sam Bell told meet and greet attendees. Bell then proceeded to read Corrente’s publication aloud, blatantly stating that it does not align with progressive Democrat values.

“I believe in Democratic values. I think it’s an embarrassment that Warwick has a so- called Democratic candidate for mayor, who, inside his booklet for a fundraiser, says “TEA” as his slogan. We don’t need a Tea Party Democrat,” Bell said after the meeting. “It epitomizes everything that’s wrong with the Rhode Island Democratic Party. I think that a city like Warwick, which has some decent Democrats on the council, can do a lot better. It’s an embarrassment, and I want the folks in Warwick to know that. Warwick needs a better Democrat running for mayor.”

Jennifer Siciliano, the Warwick Progressive Democrats Coordinator, was also somewhat perplexed by Corrente’s campaign.

"Taxed Enough Already"
“Taxed Enough Already”

“He should probably be running as a Republican, but he probably assumes that Avedisian will get the Republican nomination, so he’s just trying to run as a Democrat,” she said.

“I’ve seen conservative Democrats but not this far conservative,” she added. “I think its beyond conservative.”

Even with the criticism, Corrente not only remains positive, but adamant about running as a Democrat. When asked exactly what a “Tea Party Democrat,” was, he said, “a progressive Democrat.”

“I consider myself a progressive Democrat,” he said. “I want to do what’s right. Whether it’s raise taxes or lower taxes, and in this case it’s lower taxes.”

Corrente added that he doesn’t believe in TEA, but rather TBARD, which stands for “Taxed Beyond All Reason.” He believes that Warwick taxpayers are at a point where they are unable to pay the taxes, and will move away from the city.

His reasoning for running as a Democrat can be boiled down to the fact that he doesn’t believe in labels, but thinks that one is necessary for such a situation.

“I am running as a Democrat, because although I am fiercely independent, if I had to pick a party, it would be the Democratic Party,” he said.

“I don’t believe in labels. I don’t believe in Republican labels or Democratic labels. I don’t believe that if you are striving for a certain principle, it makes you a Democrat, or it makes you a Republican,” he added. “I consider myself progressive, and I consider myself a Democrat.”

Cut Taxes!
Cut Taxes!

Corrente said he would not entertain the idea of running as an independent because he believes a candidate is more respected if they belong to a particular party, and have a label they can be associated with.

“A candidate that belongs to the Democrats or the Republicans has a personality that can be associated with. It labels them a little bit more- they stand for something. Therefore, I think the independent voter will respect a candidate more, if they are represented by the Democrats or the Republicans,” Corrente said.

Warwick’s mayoral election is still over a year away, but if Corrente does succeed in winning the Democratic ticket, he’ll be fighting an uphill battle against Mayor Avedisian, who has been mayor since 2000.

Pigs Fly: RI Tea Party endorses government regulation

Who knows what else will happen?
Who knows what else will happen?

In a stunning turnaround, the RI Tea Party today made a full-throated endorsement of some of the most intrusive government regulations on the books. In a fundraising email, the group called on its supporters to “…rise up against this assault on everything you’ve worked your entire life to earn” — by defending existing zoning and land-use regulations throughout the suburban and rural parts of our state.

For years, suburban communities in Rhode Island (and elsewhere) have stood firmly against affordable housing through land use regulations demanding such things as minimum lot sizes, height restrictions, and prohibitions on multi-family housing.  Making it perfectly clear that land-owners’ rights to property are not absolute, these zoning regulations set very clear limits on what can and cannot be built on a piece of land, the key reason it is such a surprise to see these restrictions endorsed by the RI Tea Party and other “property rights” defenders.

There is demand for affordable housing in almost every community in Rhode Island. Were the housing market a free market, it would be built, and there would be affordable housing all over the state. But in the suburban and rural communities, local land use regulations often prevent such housing from being built anywhere in town. 

A sensible state would not throw out land use regulation — building codes and zoning regulations exist for a good reason — but would recognize when those rules and regulations had been used in ways that encourage segregation and make finding affordable places to live so difficult.

This is exactly what RhodeMapRI proposes — in the very passage the RI Tea Party quotes in their fundraising email shown here — and perhaps is why the plan enrages them so. Apparently they prefer the old restrictions on market forces to new ones.

Looks pretty persuasive, doesn't it?
Looks pretty persuasive, doesn’t it?

Rumor had it that this endorsement would have come out a week or two ago, before the RhodeMapRI plan was approved by the RI Planning Council, but that there were delays in filing the paperwork necessary to renounce the group’s previously held pro-market, anti-regulation, views.

For the RI Tea Party to endorse the status quo of zoning regulation was a surprise for many local observers. As one put it, “It’s really remarkable how flexible they are. It’s almost as if the political philosophy they espouse is just a cover for, well, something else.”

Another man on the street said, on the contrary, it was laudable for the group to be flexible about the government regulations they hated. “It’s the mark of a sophisticated mind that it can believe two completely contradictory ideas at the same time. Somebody smart said that once, wasn’t it Socrates or George Washington or someone like that?” He went on to say, “It’s like Mitch McConnell running against Obamacare in Kentucky while endorsing, and even defending, KyNect, Kentucky’s popular Obamacare exchange. If that kind of flexibility is good enough for Mitch McConnell, it’s good enough for the RI Tea Party!”

A random woman accosted on the street said, “Let go of me!”

RhodeMapRI forces state to burn your house!


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Yes, *your* house.
Yes, *your* house.
What it will probably look like.

In yet another breathless press release from The Center for Freedom and Apple Pie today, I learned that the controversial RhodeMapRI plan will call for the incineration of your house. Right down to the ground.

Be afraid. Very afraid.

Yes, it’s true, your nice comfortable suburban house, the one you dreamed about for years, is to be sacrificed to build an affordable housing skyscraper in its place. The plan calls for you to be offered a semi-private apartment, since private apartments are to be phased out. But you won’t mind sharing the kitchen and bathrooms with your less fortunate neighbors. After all, you’ll be commuting together on public transportation, since the RhodeMapRI also envisions the end of private automobiles. Your car is to be taken via eminent domain and resold to UN bureaucrats, with the proceeds made available to help keep the subsidized birth-control vending machines full in the lobby of your new home.

For those late to this party, the Center for Freedom and Apple Pie has warned all of us about the impending danger to the state posed by “RhodeMapRI” an insidious plan to end capitalism hatched within the bowels of the Rhode Island Division of Planning. The official Rhode Island Tea Party similarly warns of the terrible peril, as do totally-100%-they-promise unaffiliated citizens like Colleen Conley and Gary Morse.

Just in time these citizen activists have alerted us to the dangers within. The jack-booted planners ensconced in a Smith Hill building made of — can you imagine! — pink marble, have gussied up their world-domination plans with such appealing catch-phrases as “sustainable development” and “affordable housing.”  You might think their economic development plan looks like an appealing alternative to the plans of the past. You might be distressed that “economic development” has always seemed like a synonym for “give business whatever they want” and that it’s high time to see economic development plans that actually take everyone into account. You might even think that economic plans that emphasize sustainability are precisely what our state needs these days. But that’s because you’re just an ignorant patsy whose house is going to be burnt.

Remember, the only sensible government plans either benefit rich people or are completely ineffectual. Aren’t you glad to have such patriotic citizens as the folks at the Center for Freedom and Apple Pie to make sure that’s true? I know I am.

Gary Morse stokes suburban fears with racially-charged half-truths


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

garymorseIn a Nov. 17 piece in the Providence Journal, Gary Morse, an anti-affordable housing advocate who lives in Barrington, laid out his reasoning for opposing the RhodeMapRI plan.

“Strip away all the happy talk about walking communities and bike paths, and what RhodeMap RI is really all about is HUD’s demand that low-income housing, particularly low-income rental housing, be implemented side-by-side with existing housing in every neighborhood across America,” he wrote.

Two nights later, Morse gave a presentation that in some ways closely mirrored his more-public op/ed – with one very notable exception. The presentation focused on the idea that the federal Housing Urban Development agency, and by extension RhodeMapRI, wants to force racial integration on affluent suburban neighborhoods.

Compare the op/ed and the presentation.

“This kind of fear mongering is racism at it’s worst,” Steve Fischbach, a member of the RhodeMapRI Social Equity Advisory Committee, said of Morse’s presentation. “He’s lying and trying to scare people.”

Fischbach added, “Morse’s presentation plays on the fears of White people, falsely accusing some outside boogeyman of forcibly moving Blacks and Hispanics into housing projects that will be built in single family – meaning White – neighborhoods. It’s not even that coded. It’s pretty explicit.”

The SEAC is a central problem with RhodeMapRI for Morse and other tea party types opposed to it. And Fischback, a housing and civil rights activist, has been vocal that the opposition to RhodeMapRI is rooted in racism. NBC 10 reported on a state Planning Commission meeting at which RhodeMapRI was hotly debated and Patrick Anderson filed this overview for Providence Business News.

“To me, he’s a segregationist who is opposed to the Fair Housing Act,” Fischbach said of Morse.

According to Morse’s speech, the Fair Housing Act is a root of his concern with RhodeMapRI. This is part of what he said about it at about 2 minutes into his presentation:

Morse said evidence that RhodeMapRI is a social equity plan is that, “if you read the document you find social equity in the document seven times.” RI Future compiled seven examples (not a complete list at all) of Morse indicating RhodeMapRI will result in more people of color living in affluent suburbs from his Monday night presentation.

“He’s trying to scare white people into thinking that HUD and the SEAC will seize control of properties in White neighborhoods to build low income housing,” Fischbach said. “He accuses RhodeMapRI of engaging in social engineering by which the engineering is moving non-white people into predominantly white neighborhoods.”

As he did in his Providence Journal op/ed, Morse spoke about a court decision from Westchester County, NY. But unlike his written piece, he said, “the terms of the settlement agreement was you that you go back and count all these census blocks and look for minority populations and then you start with the census block groups that have the least number of minorities, you don’t start somewhere else, you go to your million dollar neighborhoods and you start putting in low income rental housing.”

Through much of Morse’s presentation, he stated that HUD’s and the SEAC’s mission is to deconstruct neighborhoods. In this clip he says HUD will introduce affordable housing into communities “starting with the ones with the least minority populations.” This is incorrect, Fischbach said. “A lot of what he is saying is incorrect, which further builds fear into the minds of Rhode Islanders.

In this clip, Fischbach says Morse again misrepresents maps highlighting areas of opportunity as maps of where minorities are concentrated, even though no racial data was used in the preparation of the maps. Says Morse, “The people in RhodeMap would say this is where we need to be putting in low income housing because after all look at the color we must not have any minority populations over there.”

In this clip he says there are “federal mandates to balance minority populations.”

Morse explains in this clip how developers will use the social equity committee as a way of “force fitting” an affordable housing project with people of color in neighborhoods such as the most exclusive waterfront neighborhoods in Rhode Island.

RI Future wrote about Gary Morse in May, 2013 when he had a completely different reason for opposing affordable housing. At the beginning of his presentation he says he hopes his lawsuit against the affordable housing project in Barrington can eventually “link up” with the “folks designing the RhodeMap property tax aspects.”

Here’s Morse’s unedited 26-minute presentation:

At the request of Morse and his allies, House Speaker Nick Mattiello asked for a vote on the plan to be temporarily delayed. That vote is now scheduled to happen on Thursday, December 11 at 9:00.

Racial injustice vs. property rights: Ferguson, RhodeMapRI and the American Dream


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Ferguson protestThere are two political gatherings today in Rhode Island that may have more in common with each other than it seems on the surface.

In Providence, there is a “march against police violence” in solidarity with the on-going Ferguson protests at Burnside Park, 7pm. In North Kingstown, there is an “informational meeting” about the ongoing RhodeMapRI flap at the Carriage Inn, also 7pm.

These two events will look much different. The march is at the center of urban Rhode Island and the meeting is on the outskirts of the suburbs. The march takes place on public property while the meeting is being hosted by the private sector. The march starts at the same park where Occupy Providence protested. The meeting is at a new upscale restaurant; salad = $9, steak = priced to market. The march will be multiracial while the meeting will be mostly white people. At face value, they will even be voicing very different messages: the march will focus on racial injustice while the meeting will focus on property rights.

But a deeper look at their concerns shows they are both dancing around the same issue. In Rhode Island life is nice in the suburbs, and some people want to preserve that. Life is not as nice in our cities, and some people want to change that. It’s absolutely not a coincidence that the area where people are looking for change are predominantly populated by Black and Brown people while the areas where people are looking to keep things the same are predominantly populated by White people.

The marchers want police to wear body cameras in hopes it will make law enforcement more accountable when tragedy occurs. But the people opposed to RhodeMapRI are vociferously opposed to any and all new government expenditures. The anti-RhodeMapRI activists feel strongly that affordable housing programs are bad, and that neighborhood planning is best left to market forces. Ferguson activists believe the invisible hand is largely responsible for the continued racial divide in Rhode Island and more, not fewer, public sector tools are needed to remedy this.

“We are fed up with economic injustice and inequality,” reads a Facebook invite about the march. “We are fed up with institutionalized systems of racial oppression. We are fed up with a system that serves the ruling class instead of the people.”

All citizens of our state should be made aware of this most insidious plan which will deconstruct our American Dream right here in Rhode Island if allowed to be adopted!reads a Facebook invite about the meeting.

Both events are about the American Dream. The Ferguson activists want more access to it. The anti-RhodeMapRI activists want to keep it for themselves.

Wingmen: Why did Chafee call out the tea party?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

wingmenThis week on NBC 10’s web-exclusive Wingmen segment – starring me, Rapp and Justin Katz – we discuss the tea party’s influence on state government and why Governor Chafee called them out in his State of the State speech.

I do think the tea party has an outsized influence on state politics and public debate. (They have their own radio station, for crying out loud!) I also think Rhode Island gave austerity a pretty fair shake and it hasn’t served us very well.

News, Weather and Classifieds for Southern New England

How the Koch brothers planned and parsed the shutdown


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Koch-Brothers-ExposedIt’s not hyperbole to say the Koch brothers and the tea party are systematically working together to defund the American government. According to an article in the New York Times, that’s exactly how the government shutdown happened: wealthy Republicans, well-financed Super PACS and stink tank leaders got together with tea party members and planned it out at the beginning of President Obama’s second term in office.

“I think people realized that with the imminent beginning of Obamacare, that this was a critical time to make every effort to stop something,” former Ronald Reagan staffer and friend Edwin Meese told the New York Times.

According to the very insightful Times article:

Groups like Tea Party Patriots, Americans for Prosperity and FreedomWorks are all immersed in the fight, as is Club for Growth, a business-backed nonprofit organization. Some, like Generation Opportunity and Young Americans for Liberty, both aimed at young adults, are upstarts. Heritage Action is new, too, founded in 2010 to advance the policy prescriptions of its sister group, the Heritage Foundation.

The billionaire Koch brothers, Charles and David, have been deeply involved with financing the overall effort. A group linked to the Kochs, Freedom Partners Chamber of Commerce, disbursed more than $200 million last year to nonprofit organizations involved in the fight. Included was $5 million to Generation Opportunity, which created a buzz last month with an Internet advertisement showing a menacing Uncle Sam figure popping up between a woman’s legs during a gynecological exam.

The Times even dug up a a Defunding Obamacare Toolkit that was put together for astroturfing (astroturfing is when in politics something appears to be a grassroots effort but it is really being funded and formulated by powerful political players).

It seems Justin Katz got some material from the toolkit for our appearance on 10 News Conference this weekend. I asked him if we both agreed that everyone should have insurance and he replied that everyone should have health care (3:00) but not necessarily insurance. Here that is, right on page 11 of the toolkit, right under “Suggested Responses to Congressional Offices & Members of the Press about Defunding Obamacare.”

Why libertarians should defend me


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

doreen-costaIf tea party extremists ran Rhode Island I would still be a fugitive from justice.

North Kingstown conservative Doreen Costa brought the Providence Journal’s attention to my traffic stop last weekend. But she also voted against the reason for my traffic stop during the last legislative session. According to a police report, I was detained because an East Greenwich officer noticed I wasn’t wearing my seat belt while we were both stopped at a red light. Costa voted against a bill that allows police officers to make a traffic stop based primarily on not wearing a seat belt.

According to State House lawyer Richard Raspallo:

“Doreen Costa voted against the primary seatbelt bill 6/29/2011. She again voted against removing the sunset on 5/9/2013, and against the Sub A (lowering the fine to $40.00) that passed after the bill came back from the Senate on 6/28/2013. I believe she agreed with the lowering of the fine, but since she was against the primary seatbelt law to begin with, she voted against the bill as a whole, not really against the idea of lowering a fine alone.”

Earlier this year, she told Matt Allen: “We have to stop controlling every single move we make in this state,” she . “If someone wants to get in the car and not buckle up, that’s their responsibility. The government can’t be controlling what people want to do.”

Justin Katz, who first publicized my run-in with The Law, was also a strong opponent of seat belt violations being a reason for police to pull over a driver – and he’s pointed out to me several times that a more libertarian society would have done me well. Perhaps, though one barometer will be whether or not I learned me lesson.

Katz, to his credit, has been really respectful and very professional throughout my public shaming. It was a good get on his part, and I can’t say I wouldn’t publicize his arrest either. He even wrote on his blog that I’m not a terrible person … or at least not based on my public record, I’m not!

With the possible exception of the recent drug charge (depending on your politics), progressive blogger Bob Plain’s rap sheet is essentially a story of failure to comply with rules and hardly indicates a criminal mentality.  It is, rather, evidence of the obstacle course of compliance that modern life has become.

I’m not sure how I feel politically about a seat belt snafu being a primary offense but we both agree that drug laws should be reformed. Maybe RI Future and Anchor Rising can find a way to work on that issue together?

Wheels are coming off the local tea party too


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Tea party failThe Republican Party “is acting as if the entire world is a GOP primary,” moderately conservative talking head Mike Murphy told Chris Cillizza of the Washington Post. “That is a very dangerous way to operate. We have massive image problems with the greater electorate, and the silly antics of the purist wing are making our dire problems even worse.”

Allen, in his piece titled “Republicans are their own worst political enemy,” then went on to list a number of examples from across the country in which what he called the “tea party wing” has become the biggest thorn in the side of the GOP “- more than anything Democrats have done,” he wrote.

Is a similar struggle going on here in the Ocean State in which the moderate wing of the GOP is being overshadowed by the conservative fringe? Let’s go through a partial list of ways in which the Rhode Island Republican Party has made news recently and ask yourself if to political outsiders the local GOP looks more like John Chafee or Barry Goldwater.

  • Catholic Bishop Thomas Tobin says he joined the GOP. This comes after he led a very high-profile and divisive campaign against same sex marriage. At the announcement he was asked for his opinion on “abolishing the welfare state and encouraging private charity in its place. ‘I think Jesus would say that’s terrific,’ Tobin replied.”
  • North Kingstown Rep. Doreen Costa, one of the most fiscally and socially conservative legislators in the state, demands an apology after confusion over whom she asked the Bishop to punish at that same meeting. Cranston Rep. Art Handy chided Costa in a press release after WPRI reported that she and others asked Bishop Thomas Tobin if he could somehow “punish” legislators who supported same sex marriage. Costa insists she was talking about the congressional delegation’s support of Obamacare. “My conversation had nothing to do with the civil rights of the gay community as Mr. Handy said,” she said in a press release that did not address the larger issue that she was accused of asking the church to help meter out political punishment.
  • Tea partiers and other local hard-line fiscal conservatives led and promoted a protest over a toll on the Sakonnet River Bridge that had already been reduced from $2 to ten cents  (that the state has said it won’t actively collect). When the tolls were set fire the day before the protest, both Matt Allen, of WPRO, and Justin Katz, editor of the Anchor Rising blog and employee of a anti-public sector think tank, both said the fire was a sign of how irate people were about the situation. Organizers distanced themselves from the arson but advocated for lawful forms of sabotage such as sending toll payments in checks to make collecting the fee onerous for the state.
  • Woonsocket group, RI Taxpayers organization sues the city of Woonsocket over a tax increase that was instituted by the state-appointed Budget Commission after two ALEC-aligned local legislators defied the mayor and City Council by defeating a similar proposal in 2012. At issue is that the city doesn’t have enough taxable revenue to pay school costs.
  • Right wing think tank RI Center for Freedom and Prosperity send out an email alert denying climate change. Yep, the same group that wants you to believe the doing away with all sales tax would be good for Rhode Island want to you to also know they think climate change is a myth.
  • GOP Chairman Mark Smiley and Anchor Rising blogger Patrick Laverty both accuse the General Assembly of focusing more on the so-called “calamari bill” than fixing the economy. It would be hard but not impossible to quantify but I’d be willing to bet the aforementioned conservatives in this post have talked about the so-called “calamari bill” more than the entire rest of the state combined, and well more than the General Assembly ever did. It’s certainly true that the talking point has more legs with the far right than the legislation ever did with the rest of Rhode Island.

With tolls, tea party got the government they demanded


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

newport bridge tokenWhen I was a cub reporter I subsidized my habit of writing for the Jamestown Press by working as an arborist on Aquidneck Island. To do so, I had to pay a lot of tolls going over the Newport Bridge. And not the ten cent kind like those crossing over the brand new Sakonnet River Bridge this morning. To get to Newport back then it was shell out 10 bucks for 11 tokens or pay 2 bucks each way.

So I can certainly sympathize with the folks who live in Tiverton and Little Compton – as well as Fall River and Westport – and need to get to Aquidneck Island, or vice versa. It adds up, I know. (On some days I would toss as many as six tokens in that blight at the bottom of the bridge!)

In political theory, too, I support this cause. Bridges, like buses, have a value to users and non-users alike and – in a perfect progressive world – both should be paid for communally through taxes not user fees.

But paying for anything, especially something as expensive as a bridge over Narragansett Bay, with such a simple solution is not so easy in Rhode Island in no small part because of the same conservatives fighting against the tolls.

Justin Katz, one of the most outspoken Tivertonians on tolling, says the expense should be borne by taxpayers. Meanwhile, his day job is to advocate against taxes. WPRO made the Providence Journal last week when fictional small government hero John Galt call into the Matt Allen Show to advocate against tolls. The yellow “don’t tread on me” snake shirt that graced yesterday’s protest is an iconic emblem of the tea party movement.

WPRO, Allen, Katz and the tea party are among the most vocal critics of government spending in Rhode Island politics. It stinks that people have to pay a user fee to cross the Sakonnet River Bridge but it stinks because of what small government and austerity actually look like when not fictionalized in novel or talk radio or blog post.

This isn’t big government sticking it to John Galt, Matt Allen and Justin Katz. This is what small government looks like.

The whole thing reminds me of the HL Mencken quote: “Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.”

Picture of old Newport Bridge token:

newport bridge token

 

Ken Block: Why Progressive RI Should Agree With Me


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Ken Block

Ken BlockWhile I might not agree with where Ken Block invests his energy and determination, I certainly have a lot of respect for his energy and determination. Even after I compared him to PT Barnum and likened his SNAP fraud investigation to Anthony Gemma’s voter fraud investigation, he still took the time to write an essay for RI Future on why progressives should support his efforts.

But either before or after reading Ken’s thoughts, please read my editor’s note at the bottom of his piece, and Sam Howard’s excellent analysis about how and what we communicate about those who live in poverty.

Here’s Ken’s piece:

There are two fundamental truths when it comes to social service spending programs—1) even now, these government assistance programs are not fully meeting the needs of low-income Americans and 2) there will always be people who say the government spends too much on these efforts.

The recent Washington Post story highlighting the effect of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) on the residents of Woonsocket was a powerful reminder not only of the impact of the program, but how it is leaves people struggling to make those benefits last.

The issue of targeting waste and fraud in these programs is one that makes some in the progressive community uncomfortable, because they fear that highlighting real-world abuses of welfare programs will give fodder to the forces that want to eliminate them. But let’s be honest: no degree of welfare reform, not even the most effective effort to stop waste and fraud in the system, will be enough to silence those who want government to stop funding social service efforts.

So is it best then for the progressive community to fight for state and federal expansion of programs like food stamps and housing assistance, while simply ignoring whether waste and fraud are limiting the effectiveness of those programs? I say no. If we truly believe that these programs provide lifelines to individuals and families who desperately need help to get by in today’s difficult economy, I would argue that while fighting to fully fund these programs, progressives also need to make sure that the people who need help the most are getting it.

If government isn’t moving to add additional funding to these programs, then the next best thing is making sure that waste and fraud isn’t taking money away from families in Woonsocket and other parts of the state who need it.

I have spoken to people who run Health and Human Services programs here in Rhode Island and in states across the country. They are good people who know how to get assistance dollars out the door and into the community. But they are not always as effective when it comes to making sure those dollars are creating the desired outcomes. So when I talk to them about the importance of program integrity, they get it and they realize it is a way to maximize their effectiveness and to make an even bigger difference in the lives of the people they are trying to help.

What is program integrity?

It’s a way to make the most of a limited pool of dollars. It’s a way to get the most bang for our social spending buck. And it’s a way to help make sure that people in need don’t get left out because assistance dollars are going to those who don’t deserve them.

Program integrity is the formal name given to efforts to ensure that spending in public assistance programs is consistent with the mission and rules of those programs. I believe that program integrity should be an issue that the progressive community backs whole-heartedly.

In SNAP, the key program integrity issue involves stopping unscrupulous retailers (most often small convenience store owners) who facilitate the conversion of food benefits in the SNAP program into cash. Like payday lenders who prey on those without access to the banking system, these people take a cut of the money for providing this service—often as much as 50% of the total benefit due to a recipient. The beneficiary is then able to use whatever cash is left for non-food items that SNAP would not pay for otherwise. An effective program can red flag retailers engaged in this practice and put an end to it, so that funds aren’t being channeled to retailers and so that the children of SNAP beneficiaries aren’t left going hungry because the funds the family was counting on went to pay for cigarettes, alcohol or other non-food items.

In programs like housing assistance, there are finite financial resources and a limited number of available housing units. Using program integrity here helps to ensure that the neediest citizens are not unfairly denied assistance. Section 8 housing can often have a waiting list of many years. If someone living in a subsidized housing unit is misrepresenting their financial situation and hanging onto the unit as a result, a needier family is being denied access. This is an issue of basic fairness and if the agency providing the benefits has the ability to make sure everyone is playing by the rules, they have an obligation to do so.

As with any effort that throws off a lot of data, there will be people who misconstrue and attempt to misuse program integrity data to undermine the mission or activities of the agency involved. But with or without data, those attacks will go on from those who are hell-bent to force the elimination of these necessary social service programs. But by gathering and acting on this data, program integrity initiatives produce a larger good—ensuring that taxpayer dollars targeted for social service programs provide the best possible results. And in the long run, improved results will effectively marginalize the empty noise made by those whose agenda does not involve producing positive outcomes in our communities.

I truly believe that government should always strive to measure the effectiveness of all programs and initiatives to determine if those programs are achieving their stated goals and operating efficiently. That holds true whether we are talking about evaluating economic development incentives, tax policy, social service spending programs or even something as unglamorous as DMV waiting lines or wait times for service at the Department of Labor and Training. To me, this analysis is a cornerstone of good governance and an indicator of government accountability to voters and taxpayers. And that’s something progressives should be proud to support.

 

And here’s my equally long editor’s note:

  • I firmly believe Ken Block’s efforts on this report was not the work of someone who would make a good governor. I think he is really smart and obviously hard-working, but, as Howard writes, it is “full of conjecture and insinuation that wouldn’t receive a passing grade in a college course.”
  • Holding such an opinion does not equate to supporting public sector fraud. In fact, many have suggested areas of government where both more fraud and more potential savings can be found. Scott MacKay suggested physician and health care industry fraud, for example.
  • I think the most common takeaway from this piece will be that the progressive left doesn’t value good government initiatives.
  • I think because of the way the mainstream media reported on Block’s SNAP investigation, the biggest effect of his efforts will be to further foster the false narrative that there is a widespread social services abuse among those who live in poverty (Again, see Sam Howard’s post).
  • I might be wrong, but it’s worth considering that I’m right. It is an indisputable fact that local Republicans and other fiscal conservatives are using the media swirl around his report to counter progressive proposals – see this video of Dave Fisher asking House Minority Leader Brain Newberry about tax equity.
  • If I’m right, it’s an example of how politicians and pundits have learned to manipulate the marketplace of ideas, which is still largely driven by print and broadcast journalism/journalists/pundits.
  • Ian Donnis and Scott MacKay are the best around at using the tools of unbiased journalism to get Rhode Island politicians on the record, and it is well worth listening to their probing interview with Block from last week.
  • However, it’s worth mentioning that MacKay, who dismissed Block’s report last week in this op/ed, tipped his hand in the interview: When Donnis asked Block if teaming up to form a “taxpayers” group with members of RISC and the tea party – probably two of the most conservative groups in the state – cast a shadow on his reputation as a “moderate,” you can actually hear MacKay laugh when Block responds by saying, “I became the president of a re-branded, move to the center organization…” (It happens at 6:55 here … perhaps MacKay coughed, but it is laughable to suggest that joining forces with Lisa Blais, Harriet Loyd and Donna Perry is an attempt to move to the center.)
  • So much of what Ken Block does reminds me of the famous Thomas Pynchon line from Gravity’s Rainbow: “If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don’t have to worry about the answers.”
  • Only news in his post: Ken Block says it is more important to increase funding to SNAP than it is to investigate waste and/or fraud.

Ken Block Is PT Barnum, Rhode Island The Suckers


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Joke picture that someone sent to me. Not an actual picture of Ken Block.

Ken Block is the new PT Barnum of Rhode Island. He’s dominating local politics like it’s his own private three ring circus. Too bad he’s treating Rhode Islanders like suckers in the process.

Block got an amazing amount of positive press for his report on fraud and abuse in the state SNAP program. Technically, this is called earned media but the term is a little bit of a misnomer in this instance: his report shows virtually no fraud and/or abuse. This is not unlike how Anthony Gemma got unearned media for accusing David Cicilline of voter fraud, without producing any credible evidence whatsoever.

He did the report under the guise that he could save the state a quarter billion dollars a year, even though state money isn’t spent on many of these programs. Where I come from that is called being a snake oil salesman. How is it that no one in the governor’s office noticed that Block was offering to save us more money than we spend?

Instead of saving us millions, he unearthed two homeless guys and a few dozen ACI inmates who are bilking the system and hardly identified even one dollar in savings. Talk about not producing on deliverables! In fact, one could argue that because we are now investing additional resources to ferret out the miniscule amount of fraud that does exist, the report actually costs taxpayers money! (not to say that we shouldn’t invest our tax dollars in our principles … in fact, it seems like a pretty good way to foster a principled society to me!)

But here’s what the report did accomplish: it made poor people and Gov. Chafee look bad. Those two memes – true or false – drive a lot of buzz in the local media. I’m not saying either are non-stories, but I do think several local media outlets did their audience, if not their advertisers, a disservice this week by focusing on this melodrama when much more important stories were equally ripe for the picking.

But the press just can’t resist Ken Block as of late.

The Providence Journal ran a picture of him today with what looks like people saluting him. This wasn’t even the same story as the A1; I thought an editor had botched the jump from the pope story! And the lede was written as if Ed Achorn, who was there, wrote it: “Rhode Islanders do not understand how the so-called “master lever” or straight party voting option works and no one has come forward to provide a compelling reason why it should stay.”

In his third appearance in the Providence Journal of the day, he wrote about an education issue. His expertise on the matter: “One of my dear friends teaches in the Pawtucket school system.” (Hey Sailing magazine, I have a good buddy with boat; want me to be your correspondent in French Polynesia?)  Is this really the best copy the editorial page had to use today, or is the paper of record just gaga for Ken Block?

And ere’s how the ProJo described Block’s SNAP report:

The report, more than a year in the making, does not quantify how much waste and fraud might be occurring in Rhode Island’s health and human services programs, nor does it claim to be comprehensive.

But the 16-page document, characterized by Chafee and two of his cabinet members as one piece of a broad effort to fight waste and fraud, provides a rare glimpse into the ways that some of the more than $3 billion that the state spends on social service programs can be wasted or misspent.

This is a great example of how what is commonly referred to as “unbiased journalism” an be 100 percent true and entirely inaccurate at the same time. Some examples:

  • “A year in the making” Yeah, same with my book about my Occutour. That doesn’t mean I’ve put a lot of effort into it, or that it’s going to be any good!
  • “does not quantify how much waste and abuse might be occurring … nor does it claim to be comprehensive” An unquantifiable amount of fraud and abuse that isn’t even comprehensive, stop the presses!!! Or, in other words, the report didn’t tell us too much.

Here’s WPRI lede from yesterday: “A company hired to investigate waste and fraud in the state’s welfare programs found prisoners and deceased people receiving food stamps…” Translation: company = small government activist who is probably going to run for governor. Hired = allowed to do so after he pretty much begged for it. That the lede implies prison inmates are engaging in a problematic level of fraud is particularly gross.

First of all, there are more than 3,100 people incarcerated in the ACI and only 60 of them are getting food stamps. Not 60 who are committing And even if all 60 were gaming the system, that’s still just .01 percent of the population. More importantly, of all the crimes that are probably being committed at the ACI, welfare fraud is so totally low on the list of ones that are making our community a better and/or affordable place to live. Sam Howard . Me too.

I have to believe Block knows he’s trafficking in outrage porn too. His new group of cohorts from RISC and the tea party have been specializing in this stuff for years. Even just that Block calls himself a moderate is getting to be a joke.  If you look at the RI Taxpayers legislative agenda, there is nothing at all moderate about it. He’s the president of this group. Earlier today I wrote that .

It’s all a bunch of ridiculous stuff trying to bend the debate toward otherwise unpopular politics. It’s not a bad strategy, but it’s pretty devoid of integrity.

This morning he offered to write a post for RI Future about why rooting out fraud is a progressive issue. He knows we have this in common. My opinion is he wants to make it seem like this blog or me or the progressives are pro-fraud. As a point of fact, we are opposed to fraud. That’s why I wrote this post.

Conservative Talking Points And Conspiracy Theories


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

In response to our post this morning about how increasing income taxes by 2 percent the tax rate for the richest 2 percent of Rhode Islanders, I got a couple responses on Twitter.

One came from the RI Tea Party that I thought was particularly ridiculous, but I think it also speaks to a way fiscal conservatives are manipulating the debate here in Little Rhody.

RI Tea Party on tax equity

Storified by Bob Plain· Tue, Mar 12 2013 08:35:24

Redistribution of wealth = theft “@RIFUTURE: Tax equity bill would yield additional $66 million for Rhode Islanders. http://ow.ly/iNJkC”RI Tea Party
@riteaparty I think you are taking a very radical view of income tax reform.Bob Plain
@bobplain Persecute the wealth producers of RI by giving $ they’ve earned to those who have not? If that’s radical, we’re guilty as charged.RI Tea Party
.@riteaparty you think paying taxes is being persecuted? really? #firstworldproblemBob Plain

Here’s a multiple choice question about the tea party tweets: When they tweet that tax reform is “theft” and/or persecution, do you think this is:

  1. A realistic expectation from  a civil society that has long ago decided against anarchy
  2. Purely philosophical, and not meant to be taken seriously as a matter of political debate
  3. Pure histrionics meant to make a pretty moderate progressive tax reform proposal seem like Stalinism.

If you guessed 1., you will probably enjoy life a little more in Alaska, or certain remote parts of Montana. If you guessed 2., I’d really like to have that conversation with you at another time (maybe after the session). And if you guessed 3., chances are you understand how the political/economic narrative in Rhode Island is being distorted by radical libertarian talking points.

Seriously folks, this is a real issue in Rhode Island.

In today’s Providence Journal Ed Achorn actually put forward the idea that perhaps Governor Chafee and the legislature want people to move out of Rhode Island because that will make them more politically powerful. This is a paid staffer for the statewide paper of record who wrote this!!

I once worked for an editor in Oregon who believed that September 11 was planned by the Bush Administration and that the United States faked the moon landing, and he opined about such things! Achorn’s allegation is equally credible. Personally, I don’t suspect either of them believe in such conspiracy theories … I think they all just enjoy writing ridiculous things.

Barry Hinckley: Tea Party Republican of Choice


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Remember when Republican Senate candidate Barry Hinckley courted out-of-state political donors by saying, “Although many of you who live out of state cannot vote for me – remember, I can vote for you.”? Well, it seems as if one out-of-state group has taken him up on the offer.

Hinckley was endorsed by the Freedomworks PAC on Tuesday, which on its website describes itself as “leading the fight for lower taxes, less government, and more freedom.”

You can say that again.

Freedomworks is the anti-tax astroturfing group that secretly organized the first tea party protests in 2009, according to The Atlantic.

Here’s how a article in The Guaridan described the group:

It was set up by one of America’s richest men, David Koch, an oil tycoon who has funded rightwing causes for decades.

FreedomWorks receives funding from the tobacco conglomerate Philip Morris, as well as from Richard Scaife, another business tycoon, who for years helped fund dirt-digging investigations into Bill Clinton. Local branches of Americans for Prosperity have also received tobacco money; the group has opposed smoke-free workplace laws and cigarette taxes.

In the environmental area, too, there has been an affinity between the groups and the corporate interests that back them. ExxonMobil was a sponsor of Citizens for Sound Economy, and both FreedomWorks and Americans for Prosperity have campaigned vigorously against Obama’s plans to reduce CO2 emissions through a cap and trade scheme, working closely with the American Petroleum Institute.

It’s endorsement of Barry Hinckley should speak volumes to Ocean Staters. I’m pretty certain most Rhode Islanders want our Senators to represent Rhode Island, not the Koch Brothers and ExxonMobile.

Tea Party Uses True the Vote Tactics to Stifle Votes


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

It turns out Anthony Gemma isn’t the only one using allegations of voter fraud to prop up his political agenda. Local tea party groups are doing so too, using both his tactics and his allegations, under the auspices of True the Vote.

“True the Vote’s plan is to scrutinize the validity of voter registration rolls and voters who appear at the polls,” according to an article in today’s New York Times. “Among those in their cross hairs: noncitizens who are registered to vote, those without proper identification, others who may be registered twice, and dead people.”

This all sounds well and good but read further into the story and you’ll find True the Vote is doing much more than just looking for voter fraud. Here’s what the Times reports about True the Votes efforts in the Wisconsin recall vote:

True the Vote began working in Wisconsin in 2011, the same year it received a $35,000 grant from the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, which is based in Wisconsin and is a major backer of conservative causes, including Americans for Prosperity. The foundation’s president and chief executive, Michael Grebe, was Mr. Walker’s campaign chairman for his 2010 campaign and for the recall election, which he won.

The accountability board concluded that about 900,000 signatures were valid and, in a memorandum reviewing True the Vote’s work, criticized its methods. For example: Mary Lee Smith signed her name Mary L. Smith and was deemed ineligible by the group.

Signatures deemed “out of state” included 13 from Milwaukee and three from Madison. The group’s software would not recognize abbreviations, so Wisconsin addresses like Stevens Point were flagged if “Pt.” was used on the petition. Signatures were struck for lack of a ZIP code.

It’s pretty clear True the Vote has political motivations outside of cleaning up voter rolls. According to the Times, “it grew out of a Tea Party group, King Street Patriots, that [was] founded in Texas. An examination shows that it has worked closely with a variety of well-financed organizations, many unabashed in their desire to defeat President Obama.”

So why should Rhode Islanders care?

Because the local incarnation of the Tea Party is using True the Vote methodology to scrutinize elections here too.

This from the Ocean State Tea Party in Action’s August newsletter:

Marina Peterson of East Bay Patriots, is heading up a project to clean up voter rolls. The work must be done within the next couple of weeks. The work can be done on your own time, in your own home with the use of a computer.  Help identify potential voter problems – people registered at commercial properties or vacant lots, numerous people registered at one address, etc.

If you want to be part of a movement that helps protect the vote of the individual and stops the fraudulent casting of votes, then please sign up at http://www.truethevote.org/volunteer/.  The cost to register is $25.  Ocean State Tea Party in Action will reimburse you for this cost.
In fact, True the Vote is even trafficking in Gemma’s unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud lobbed at David Cicilline. In this post it links to a story from the American Spectator, but it’s really just a reprint from the local Tea Party group’s media ally the Ocean State Current, an arm of the conservative Rhode Island Center for Freedom and Prosperity.
Update: The East Bay Patriots say they are not a tea party group.

GOP Strategy for General Assembly Needs Work


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

So, according to RINPR’s Ian Donnis, RI Republican Party chairman Mark Zaccaria only plans to run 40-50 candidates for the 113-member General Assembly (about half of the number who ran in 2010 during the Tea Party Revolt). Mr. Zaccaria says that the goal is to force floor fights over every major piece of legislation, and that the focus on fewer candidates will allow for deeper distribution of resources.

I’m not buying it. First, Democrats are extremely well-equipped, monetarily, to fend off challengers (for instance, Speaker Fox alone has a quarter of a million dollars, search the filings here). Second, I’d be more inclined to believe that the RI GOP was a strong and credible organization if they actually came off that way. But go to their website and tool around for a bit. I found these problems with it:

  • The carousel only has one thing on it, leading to lots of clicking on those arrows.
  • The sole item in the carousel asks if you’ve heard their radio ad, but clicking on it just brings you back to the home page.
  • The “At The Front” blog has one article, which discusses Rhode Island Democrats and hardly mentions the Republicans.
  • There are no events on the events page.
  • The lead story in “Latest News” is the selection of Delegates for the Convention.
  • There’s a Twitter feed, but it’s used so rarely (tweets from 13 and 28 days ago) that it might as well be static.
  • RIGOPtv (their YouTube channel) shows a video from 2011 about the jobs plan put out by the U.S. House Republicans.
  • The “About” section is about Mr. Zaccaria, not the party.

Obviously, the Democrats have a much better website (they also have more money to spend on it). And obviously, you can have a crappy website and still be a really great organization. But in the 21st Century, we should note that websites are often the first impression you make on people. And RIGOP.org is not an inspiring impression, though its big candidates (Brendan Doherty & Barry Hinckley) have much stronger websites.

My main issue is with any political organization (Republican, Tea Party, Democrat, Progressive, Green, Moderate, etc.) looking to undo the establishment is that “less is more” does not seem to be an actual functioning approach. There’s just so many things you get from more candidates:

  • A Sense of Movement: When you have a lot of people standing up and declaring themselves under your banner it makes people take notice. It also means that you have more chances to win. If you can’t assist everyone with your meager resource, then focus on those you believe have a chance, and make it clear to those you can’t that you’ll help them if you gain those resources.
  • Larger Networks: Each candidate brings in a different social network. The more candidates that are running, the greater amplification of your organization’s message through their networks. Also, the people they attract to their campaigns are going to be your next generation of candidates and supporters. With fewer candidates, you’re restricting yourself.
  • Drowns Out the Wackos: Some people just have weird beliefs. And they’re often dedicated enough to act upon those beliefs. More candidates means that you’ll keep those folks from totally defining your organization. Obviously, if you’re not a political party, you can exert more control over your candidates. But since the only way to keep someone from running under your banner as a party is to primary them, more candidates means you can show such candidates to by atypical.
  • Free Experience: Training people requires work and time. While it behooves you to offer training to candidates and their staff, there’s nothing like real, on-the-job experience. Yes, inexperienced people screw up. But that’s how people learn. Your goal as a political organization should be to minimize and counteract those mistakes, making it easier for people to participate without sinking your candidates.

Those are benefits I see. Certainly, I’m no heroic field director or party organizer. I think for the Republicans to announce that they’re fielding almost half of the candidates they had in the last election makes it look like they’re contracting, rather then expanding. Which makes them look far weaker then might actually be the case. And if the emphasis is going to be on quality rather than quantity, you have to be of better quality then your opponents.

The other issue here is that perhaps the Republicans have set their sights too low. Forcing a floor debate on major bills isn’t exactly the rallying cry that inspired Tea Party activists last election cycle (“We Want Our Country Back!”). If someone promised me they were going to lose a lot while talking a lot, I’d laugh in their face. The promise needs to be big: our members are going to have control of the state. That should be the promise of any party or organized faction in the state. Republicans aren’t even promising to take one chamber of the General Assembly.

Because but no matter your goal, you’re probably not going to live up to it (unless you’re the ruling Democratic Party). And if you’re going to go down, go down kicking and screaming, because whimpering doesn’t look strong.

The State’s New Economy Wrong Way Run

 Disturbing hints this week from EDC director, Keith W. Stokes, that the state plans to continue it’s new economy wrong way run, even possibly eliminating financing of the Slater Technology Fund, this on the heels of the positive news of a $9 million federal grant.

“The hope would be that we can continue to maintain state support consistent with past practice or, better still, increased levels of investment,” [Slater managing director Richard] Horan said. “Given the cost-effectiveness of the program … there is certainly a case to be made.”

But Keith W. Stokes, executive director of the R.I. Economic Development Corporation, says the $9 million from the U.S. Department of Treasury’s State Small Business Credit Initiative should be a major step toward Slater becoming self-sustaining. “That money [now provided annually by the state to Slater] has to go to more economic development.”

Slater currently receives $2 million dollars from the state, money well spent and an amount itself reflective of the steep funding cuts doled out by the state in 2009.

Yes, there certainly is a case to me made for the cost-effectiveness of the program. In recent years Rhode Island moved from a middling 29th to as high as 11th in 2008 in national rankings, a needed bright spot in the state’s business outlook. When we look back in a few years at where we are, will we wonder why we let Tea Party type, anti-tax gone haywire conservatism trump sound business sense?


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387