Whitehouse On SCOTUS: ‘Corporate Activism’


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Sen Sheldon Whitehouse at RIC for a meeting of the RI Healthcare Exchange Commission.

Following President Obama’s lead, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse chided the Supreme Court saying some of its members have become more interested in activism than jurisprudence.

“If you can’t tell the difference between health care and broccoli there’s a real problem,” he said this morning at RIC, referencing Justice Antonin Scalia’s line of questioning as the court debated Obamacare last week.

Whitehouse even offered a reply to Scalia’s broccoli comparison.

“If you house burns down, we don’t rebuild your house,” he said, while talking to a group at RIC for the Health Care Exchange Commission meeting he attended. “But if you go to the hospital, we fix your broken leg.”

Later in the day, on a conference call with Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-NY, he said, “There comes a point when have to be able to tell the truth about the Supreme Court, and that is it’s activist and is becoming even more activist. One might even say corporate activism.”

Whitehouse, a member of the Judiciary Committee, was once considered by President Obama for an open slot on the high court.

He noted the irony in Republicans and conservative-leaning Supreme Court justices taking issue with individual mandates, saying the idea was often trumpted by Richard Nixon, the Heritage Foundation and longtime moderate Republican from Rhode Island John Chafee, Gov. Linc Chafee’s dad.

“It was the insurance companies that wanted mandates in the bill,” he said, noting that only because of federalism, the idea that some decisions are best left to the states, is the issue before the Supreme Court.

“Every state can require mandates tomorrow and there isn’t a lawyer in the country who would say that is unconstitutional.”

Whitehouse said many Republicans in Congress agree that universal health insurance would be good for society, but said many are afraid of raising the ire of party extremists.

“I know people who say, ‘you’re absolutely right but I can’t talk about that because I’d get a Tea Party primary opponent if I do.'”

He added that both Republican and Democratic leaders agree that once you drill down into the deficit the big drivers are often related to health care, saying, “If we don’t do it this way, the way we are going to do it is when China says you guys are out of control and we’re not going to loan you any more money.”

 

CWA Supports Product Stewardship for CFLs


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The House Environment and Natural Resources Committee heard testimony last week on several pieces of legislation aimed at involving producers in the end-of-life management of their products.

This concept, known as Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), creates financial incentives for manufacturers to design products that are less toxic, more durable, and more easily recycled. Rhode Island already has three EPR laws on the books. The collection of electronic waste, mercury auto switches, and mercury thermostats are managed through programs that are created and funded by manufacturers.

House Bill 7443 takes the next step in keeping mercury out of our waste stream, requiring manufacturers of florescent light bulbs either to develop a voluntary program to address the disposal of their bulbs or allow the Department of Environmental Management (DEM) to convene a stakeholder group charged with the creation of a mandatory program.

Sponsor of this bill and Committee Vice Chairperson, Rep. Donna Walsh (D-Charlestown) opened the hearing to a packed room by stating, “Producer responsibility is here to stay.” She also emphasized the flexibility of the bill. “There is a voluntary program in this. There are options.”

“I am excited about the NEMA’s (National Electrical Manufacturers Association) new position on producer responsibility,” said Jamie Rhodes, Rhode Island Director for Clean Water Action. “There was near universal agreement on the need for further action to prevent any additional mercury from being disposed of inappropriately. It is always a positive experience when we can work with manufacturers to develop a plan that works just as well for them as it does for all Rhode Islanders.”

Janet Coit, Director of Rhode Island DEM stated, “It looks like we’re moving towards the same thing.” The driving force behind DEM’s support for fluorescent lamp product stewardship is the hazard of improper disposal of mercury. Coit continued, “Mercury is a powerful neurotoxin and we do want to deal with that.” Liz Stone, spokeswoman for DEM, added, “What it comes down to, is that there are very few places in the state to take your bulbs.  So many people throw them in the trash because they don’t know what to do with them.”
In recognizing the positive steps that industry has taken voluntarily, staff attorney Jerry Elmer of the Conservation Law Foundations added, “Despite the fact that 90% of the mercury in light bulbs has been removed and that we’ve moving away from CFLs, there’s still a lot of mercury in the waste stream that needs to be addressed.” Rhode Island Resource Recovery Corporation estimated that they spend around $6,000 to dispose of the 8,000 – 12,000 fluorescent bulbs which they collect.

While House Bill 7443 gives DEM the ability to promulgate rules to address fluorescent lamps, it contains a specific provision to allow a voluntary program to be created by the industry and submitted to the DEM for approval. In support of a potential NEMA voluntary program, Stone added, “This law allows for a voluntary program and we at DEM prefer that. Laws have generally been passed because the industry needs that nudging.”

Matt Prindiville, Associate Director of the Product Policy Institute, described the success of similar programs in other states. “We have over 200 collection locations in Maine, many of them at retail locations. It’s easy for consumers to find these sites.”

RI municipalities have also supported the concept of EPR. “Fourteen of Rhode Island’s cities and towns, representing 56% of the state’s population, have already passed resolutions in support of producer responsibility,” affirmed Amy Vitale of Clean Water Action during the hearing. “This is an extension of existing Rhode Island laws aimed at reducing human exposure to mercury. Though the industry assures us that fluorescent lamps containing mercury are being phased out, their long lifespan ensures that they will be part of our waste stream for at least the next decade.”

Clean Water Action (CWA) is a national organization with over 40,000 members in Rhode Island, working to protect our environment, health, economic well-being and community quality of life. CWA organizes strong grassroots groups and coalitions, and campaigns to elect environmental candidates and solve environmental and community problems.

Many organizations were on hand to support this proposal, including RI Resource Recovery Corporation, Conservation Law Foundation, Clean Water Action, the RI Product Stewardship Council, Sierra Club, the RI DEM, Environment RI, and the Environment Council of RI.

RI Progress Report: Teachers v. Tuition, Ciccone, RIP Peter Lord


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Rightfully, Sen. Frank Ciccone is emerging as the biggest loser in the incident in which his senate colleague Dominick Ruggerio was arrested for allegedly driving drunk and refusing a breathalyzer. Ciccone is accused of attempting to coerce Barrington police officers to let Ruggerio off by threatening legislative retribution. We’re not sure exactly which is more dangerous to society: inebriated elected officials operating motor vehicles or inebriated elected officials using their positions to gain personal favor. Neither should be taken lightly.

Rest in peace, Peter Lord, the hugely-respected Projo environmental reporter who died yesterday of a brain tumor, and thank you so much for your years of explaining our natural world to us.

Thank you Gov. Chafee, for declining to give URI professors 3 percent raises at the same time that tuition is going up 9.5 percent. (I’m sure to hear from an ex-prof or two for this line, but oh well…)

As Providence is asking retirees to take a cut in benefits, the city failed to apply for $1.6 million in federal reimbursement from the Affordable Care Act to help offset these kinds of costs. Remarkably, the Capital City said it asked two health care providers to complete the application for it! I guess the old saying is true: if you want something done right, do it yourself. If you don’t, hire a health care provider.

More bad news for Barry Hinckley’s campaign for Senate. His spokesman John Loughlin has resigned after an erroneous attack on Sheldon Whitehouse’s Buffett Rule bill.  No word yet on whether Loughlin will be replaced by Hudson Hinckley, the previous campaign insider to give the candidate some bad press…

Congrats to Allan Tear, founder of Betaspring, who was asked by President Obama to join him at the White House today when he signs a bill into law that will help small businesses like his raise ore investment money.

Sen. Jack Reed will be at the soon-to-be-operational Wickford Junction train depot this morning, which is slated to start service later this month. The developers of the project have been waiting some 30 years for rail service in North Kingstown.

Turns out ALEC, the secretive business-backed group that quietly pushes for local legislation often bad for democracy and citizens, was behind the law that allowed Trayvon Martin’s killer to walk away without being charged.

Please, local media, give us less updates on lottery winners …. after all, lotteries are little more than a “cheap tax on the poor.”

Congrats to President Obama, who now seems guaranteed to get to run against Mitt Romney for re-election. “I’ve yet to meet a single person in the Republican establishment that thinks Mitt Romney is going to win the general election this year,” GOP cheerleader Joe Scarborough said yesterday.

 

A Possible Progressive Flameout in CD1 Race


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Rep. David Cicilline (D - RI 1)

The line I’ve been toting is that Congressman David Cicilline isn’t as beatable as his approval ratings suggest. First off, I doubt that his approval ratings are low because of his time in Congress, where’s he’s been a reliable progressive vote (as he was always going to be). What seems to be the zeitgeist is that Mr. Cicilline is disliked because Providence is having budget issues.

I still think without a progressive anti-Cicilline in the primary race, progressive voters who fear that Mr. Cicilline might lose aren’t going to abandon him. Progressives are warming up right now, though they haven’t caught fire (they seem to have a knack for picking disappointing candidates).

If soon-to-be-announced primary opponent Anthony Gemma runs as he did last cycle – like he was running for a different office – then the only way he’ll win is through voter antipathy towards Mr. Cicilline, and not for any love of Mr. Gemma.

Let’s consider that possibility for a second. If you’re a progressive, here’s the question I have to ask: where do you go from there? Who do you vote for in November? Do you vote for Brendan Doherty and give a seat to the Republicans on the off-chance that Doherty will be defeated in 2014? Do you vote for Mr. Gemma, a right-wing Democrat who appears more likely to side with the Republicans than the Democrats and who’s competence you don’t have much faith in, but if elected is likely to stay there for years to come? Or do you just skip voting in CD1 come November?

I’m suspecting the last one for many progressives. The issue is that there is no “white knight” in the wings. Since progressives are over-reliant on the Democratic Party, there’s no way to do an end-run around the Democratic nomination process and run a progressive independent. That independent would also have to be well-financed and well-known (and at least popular with a decent swathe of Rhode Islanders); or otherwise risk media marginalization (a very stark possibility). If Mr. Cicilline goes down in a primary duel with Mr. Gemma, that will be it. Two non-progressives will battle for the center-right of Rhode Island voters.

It’s a sad problem to have. The only progressive candidate is terribly flawed, making what should be an easy waltz to reelection an obstacle course.

Secretaries Shouldn’t Pay More Than Millionaires


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Sen. Josh Miller and Rep. Maria Cimini, sponsors of a bill that would raise taxes on the richest 2 percent of Rhode Islanders.

What’s wrong with our tax structure in Rhode Island?

If you’re part of the 98% of Rhode Islanders making under $250,000 a year you’re paying your fair share and more. So why does the General Assembly say we don’t have the revenue to invest in affordable housing for all Rhode Islanders, making college affordable, or school breakfast programs in our public schools?

The problem is the way we’re raising revenue.

Rhode Island’s tax structure is inherently regressive, that means the poorer you are the higher share of your income you’re paying in taxes. And the numbers are astonishing!

When you combine all the taxes we pay, sales, property, income and car taxes, the 20% of Rhode Islanders who are living on $18,000 a year or less are forking over 11.9% of their annual income in taxes. For the top 1%, the people making over $390,000 a year it’s just 5.6%.

Think of it this way. If Warren Buffet and his secretary both go buy the same toaster and they both pay 7% sales tax on it, that flat tax rate means a lot more to his secretary. Its money that she can’t spend on basic necessities, but for Warren Buffet it doesn’t even make a dent.

We can start fixing our regressive tax structure this year with the Miller Cimini Tax Equity bill, and we need your help to do it!

Tell the General Assembly to stop balancing the budget on the backs of the middle and working class workers! Secretaries shouldn’t pay higher taxes than millionaires!