Rhode Island Republicans Want To Lose Elections


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

After the shellacking on November 6th, political voices across the ideological spectrum called on the Republican Party of Rhode Island to adapt or die. Words like “moderate,” “women,” and “Latinos” were thrown around, often with reckless disregard for their meanings. Appeal to these voters, so the story goes, and the Republicans will regain competitiveness.

Now, maybe the Republicans can swallow their revulsion towards immigrants, slap some lipstick on that elephant, and somehow pretend they’re alright with government helping people out and not mandating what can and cannot be done in the bedroom; but I really doubt it. That’s just too much change.

Americans got the Full Monty of Republican radicalism in 2012. And they straight up rejected it. Todd Akin’s “legitimate rape” comment wasn’t something new; Republican candidates have been using pseudo-science for years to justify their positions. Same with Mitt Romney’s 47% speech. One doesn’t have to look very far to find that kind of thinking; if you don’t watch Fox News, read the comments on the Providence Journal or GoLocalProv.

The other thing is that the RI GOP has a great hatred of Rhode Island and its people. Certainly, most of their candidates tend to know better than to express that outright. But I guarantee you the nativist comments on the Journal‘s site aren’t coming from Democrats. I’ve scrolled through enough comments to know that insulting Rhode Islanders’ intelligence is probably what passes for sport among these Republican commenters. That’s if they’re not actively encourage us to flee our homes.

“Surely Sam, these are the worst elements of the Party, on a medium with virtually no filters,” you might protest. That’s probably true, I’m sure most Republicans are good-hearted folks who just want the best for everyone. But here’s the problem: I’m not seeing those good-hearted folks. I’m reading horrible words written by really terrible people. That’s the Republican Party I see every day.

Not “moderate,” “women,” or “Latinos.” As if you can compete solely on those voters. “Blacks,” “the poor,” “young people.” All won by Democrats by significant margins, but ignored by Republicans. In fact, Republican commentator Travis Rowley asserts that Republicans don’t have to appeal to any of the former types of voters at all! Latino and women voters will magically fall in line with Republican values.

Could that be more delusional? Latinos have been in this country since Texas was annexed (probably before), and the Mexican-American War added thousands more. The point being, it’s been about 170 years. And women have been voting for nearly a century. You’d think they would’ve come around by now. You’d think Republicans would be gaining their votes, not shedding them.

Perhaps so few Republicans ran in RI because they felt that competing in the democratic process was beneath them. Those filthy, stupid citizens of this state get to vote? The nerve of them!

Kidding aside, Republicans have spent years denigrating community organizers and even longer denigrating union organizers. Those people don’t sit idly by every election. They take time off, and they go work for candidates who will help them. Their jobs are to organize some of the most difficult people to organize, and/or in the most hostile of conditions. They ain’t idiots when it comes to getting people to turnout for things. But since Republicans have written off unions, and organizing in general, they wouldn’t know that organizing really does matter.

What does the party of privilege know about organizing? What does a party so hostile to the very concept understand about it? The lessons of 2008 permeated nearly every campaign for every Democratic candidate across America. Look for 2012’s lessons to likewise be applied. Democratic campaigns are going to get more sophisticated.

But there conservatives go, telling themselves it was because Mr. Romney was too moderate. Or, laughably, it was because he was “progressive”. Or Democratic “lies”. Not that the GOP is becoming increasingly unpopular and increasingly outdone on the electoral ground game.

American conservatives are starting to parallel German conservatives in the 1920s; unable to fathom their loss in World War I, they made up excuses for how the German Empire could’ve been defeated rather than re-evaluating the ideals and policies that led to that defeat. Likewise, Republicans have a handy set of excuses for their defeats, born of the alternate reality they created during the campaign, and are showing an unwillingness to re-evaluate the ideals and policies that brought them to this mess.

I don’t think the RI GOP can change. I don’t think they have it in them. I think they’re content to lose.

Study: Young People of Color Have Political Power


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

In the days since the election, there has been a renewed attention on our country’s changing demographics, given the overwhelming Obama/Democratic successes among voters of color. The increased margin of support for Democrats among Latino voters was significant enough to cause some GOP leaders to choke on their pretzels, and now it appears that a bi-partisan discussion of immigration reform is once again (thankfully) underway.

A report (pdf) issued last week by the Black Youth Project digs into several findings on the changing racial composition of our country’s electorate, and brings a particular focus to the key role of young people of color in Obama’s re-election.

As anyone who volunteered for the Obama campaign during this election could tell you, youth of color were an important element (along with women & union members) of the Democrats’ highly-energetic ground game. The study, however, focuses on their growing significance as a voting bloc — noting that the share of young voters of color in the overall electorate has continuing to grow over the last three Presidential elections. For the Democrats, it helped to make up for a fact that I found surprising: among white voters under 30, Obama actually lost to Romney.

That’s right — while 54% of young white voters supported Obama in 2008, according to exit polls only 44% voted for Obama in 2012.  Of course, some of us graduated from the U-30 bracket in the intervening years, but that’s more of a discussion between me and my retreating hairline — and it doesn’t explain the turn towards Romney among those who “replaced” us in this demographic group. (This shift merits further analysis, to be sure.)

Here are a few other highlights from the report (the emphasis is mine):

Blacks and Latinos comprised an increasingly larger share of the voting electorate in each of the last three presidential elections. In 2012, young people under 30 years of age accounted for nearly 20 percent of the voting electorate, and Blacks and Latinos made up almost half of young voters. […]

People of color—and Blacks and Latinos specifically—comprise increasingly large portions of the voting electorate. Not only are people of color gaining numbers in the population (especially Latinos), but voter turnout among these groups is also increasing relative to whites…Since 2004, the proportion of white voters has decreased from 78 percent to 72 percent, while the proportion of Black and Latino voters has increased from 18 percent to 23 percent. […]

Overall, 60 percent of youth supported President Obama in the 2012 election, down slightly from 66 percent in 2008—but considerably greater than the 54 percent of the vote that youth provided John Kerry in the 2004 election. However, contrary to the idea of a monolithic youth vote, there is considerable variation by racial group among young people in whom they support for president [and] these differences have increased in recent presidential elections. […Because] of the increased percentages of young people of color that are voting, these populations have played an increasingly important role in selecting the nation’s president, and will continue to do so.

The Center for American Progress has a longer (pre-election) discussion of what I think is the bottom line here: any party or candidate that wishes to remain relevant to American politics must have a platform and program that speaks (and listens) to the concerns of young people as a whole, and young people of color in particular — or else be relegated to that proverbial dustbin of history.

Progress Report: Homeless Families ‘Flood’ RI; Israel v. Palestinians; Caramadre as Robin Hood; Driver’s Licenses


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Ft. Wetherill in Jamestown at dawn last week. (Photo by Bob Plain)

The number of Rhode Island families that have stayed in homeless shelters so far this year has increased by more than 30 percent, reports the Providence Journal this morning. If that isn’t startling enough, some 60 percent of the families staying in shelters aren’t even unemployed. That’s right, they have jobs but still can’t afford or can’t find housing.

As Crossroads President Anne Nolan told the ProJo, “It’s trickle-down economics. The people at the bottom have been pushed out and are continuing to be pushed out.” And Nolan is  not to be confused with a strict Keynesian.

Meanwhile, the AP reports this sad news: “Police believe a Warwick man barricaded himself in his home and then killed himself after being served with foreclosure papers.”

And as Rhode Island continues to crumble from the bottom up, the Middle East continues to tear itself apart. Let’s hope lame duck Secretary of State Hillary Clinton can inject some peace into the escalating crisis between Israel and the Palestinians.

I really don’t have a good sense of what Rhode Island, or the local progressive community, thinks of this situation. Is Hamas engaging in terrorism, or is Israel engaging in apartheid? Of course, these two loaded terms are in no way mutually exclusive of each other and we like our geopolitical strife to be much more black and white than this conflict is. Unfortunately, it seems it’s not something we debate on the local level. To that end, I’d like to invite a wide variety of voices to share their thoughts on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Joe Caramadre may have pleaded guilty to fraud, but I’m not convinced it’s entirely accurate to say he “preyed on terminally ill people.” ProPublica wrote in August that it can be argued he was a Robin Hood-like character, who stole from insurance companies and split the ill-gotten gains with those on or near their deathbeds. I certainly can’t fault him for taking a bigger slice of the take, as he bore a lot more of the risk than did his elderly clients, but they bore some and there’s no evidence he apprised anyone that what he was doing could be construed to be illegal. and given how clever Caramadre seems to be, I’m guessing that at least occurred to him…

I think it’s ridiculous to think that a judge can’t be impartial because a couple of her family members have financial stakes in the case. Though I should add I don’t think it’s unreasonable that the case be delayed until that question is reasonably flushed out. I should also add that it’s very reasonable for the state to delay the cuts until their legality is reasonably flushed out. Besides, won’t all judges have a direct financial stake in the case?

Gov. Chafee met yesterday with activists who say driver’s licenses should be given based on the ability to drive, not where one was born.

The Hollywood Reporter addresses its dark past in blacklisting communist sympathizers.

I second Ian Donnis’ call for more tweeting by elected officials … politicians, I promise your constituents will think better of you for doing this, whether they tweet themselves or not.

I also second Dan Lawlor’s call for mandatory press conferences by legislative leaders. Seriously, it’s comical what reporters sometimes have to do to get a quick quote from either the Senate President of Speaker of the House after the session. In fact, in addition to cars, they also each have security guards whose sole job sometimes is making sure I can’t ask them a question or two.

On this day in 1962, President Kennedy banned discrimination in federal housing programs … 50 years later we’re still trying to implement the spirit of this executive order

America Says No Christmas Before Thanksgiving


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Nope, it’s not just you. It turns out most Americans don’t want to deal with Christmas until after Thanksgiving, according to a new poll by Harris Interactive.

According to the survey, a whopping 75 percent of people surveyed don’t want to see holiday decorations in stores until after Thanksgiving. Similarly, 78 percent said they didn’t want to hear holiday music in stores until after Thanksgiving.

“The results of our Holiday Readiness Survey show that Americans think stores shouldn’t ‘Deck the Halls’ until after Thanksgiving,” said Tom Lounibos, the CEO of SOASTA, the online testing company that commissioned the poll.

I’d think that would mean we generally don’t want to start shopping before Thanksgiving either, let alone on Thanksgiving – as the retail industry would have you believe.

Oh, and by the way, I stand corrected … there may be some labor protests at local Walmarts after all. According to this Facebook page, there will be actions at the Walmarts in Fall River at 11am, Seekonk at 1pm and at the Providence Walmart at 2pm.

According to a press release, here’s the methodology for the poll: “This survey was conducted online within the United States by Harris Interactive on behalf of SOASTA from September 17, 2012 – September 19, 2012 among 2,346 adults age 18+. This online survey is not based on a probability sample and therefore no estimate of theoretical sampling error can be calculated.