ACLU, Phil Eil sue DEA for public records requested 3 years ago


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

acluThe ACLU of Rhode Island filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit Wednesday on behalf of local journalist, Philip Eil, who has been stymied for more than three years in his effort to obtain access to thousands of pages of public evidence from a major prescription drug-dealing trial.

The lawsuit, against the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), seeks a court order to release the documents, a declaration that the DEA has wrongfully withheld and redacted documents, and an award of attorney fees. Filing the suit were ACLU volunteer attorneys Neal McNamara and Jessica Jewell, from the law firm of Nixon Peabody.

The request in question involves the evidence used to convict Dr. Paul Volkman, whom the Department of Justice has called the “largest physician dispenser of oxycodone in the United States from 2003 to 2005.” Volkman was indicted on 22 drug trafficking-related counts in 2007, and, in 2011, after an eight-week federal court trial in Ohio that included 70 witnesses and more than 220 exhibits, he was convicted of, among other charges, prescribing medications that caused the overdose deaths of four patients. In 2012, Volkman was sentenced to four consecutive life terms in federal prison — one of the lengthiest criminal sentences for a physician in U.S. history.

Volkman attended college and medical school with Eil’s father, and, in 2009, Eil began conducting research and reporting for a book about the case. After Volkman’s trial ended, Eil requested access to the trial evidence from the clerk of the U.S. District Court in Cincinnati. This request was denied, as were Eil’s subsequent requests to the Ohio U.S. Attorney’s office, the U.S. District Court judge who presided over the case, and the clerk of the 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.

On February 1, 2012, Eil filed a FOIA request with the Executive Office of U.S. Attorneys, which eventually transferred the request to the DEA nine months later. The DEA still has not completely fulfilled the request, despite numerous efforts by Eil to expedite a response. Pending with the DEA for more than 800 days, Eil’s request is eight months older than what the federal government-operated website, FOIA.gov, reports as the agency’s longest pending request.

DEA MOSTLY REDACTED SLIDESHOW SLIDE

One of the 133 slides released to Mr. Eil. The substance of nearly every slide was redacted.

In addition to the time it has taken to process the request, the DEA has withheld 87 percent of the 12,724 pages it has thus far processed for Eil’s FOIA request, and stripped most of the substantive information from the remaining 1,600 pages it has “released.” For example, as the lawsuit notes, one of the nine installments of releases to Eil included “a 133-page slide show where the substance from nearly every single slide is redacted.”  In another one of the “partial releases” of information, the DEA withheld 1,225 of 1,232 pages it processed.

“You can’t have a true democracy without a transparent court system, and this case represents an egregious failure of judicial transparency,” Eil said. “The right to a public trial is a basic tenet of our society, and it’s scary to think that any trial in the United States, especially one of this magnitude, would be retroactively sealed off from public view, as this case has.”

All too often at both the state and federal level, agencies address the public’s right to know as they would an exceedingly unpleasant chore – reluctantly, with some disdain, and with little care for the finished product – instead of as the fundamental and essential engine of democracy that it is. Mr. Eil’s efforts and this lawsuit are a reminder of the importance of persistence in holding government agencies accountable to the public.

Eil is an award-winning freelance journalist who, most recently, was news editor and staff writer of the Providence Phoenix until the paper’s closing in 2014. He has taught classes on writing and journalism at the Rhode Island School of Design, where he will return as an adjunct lecturer in September. He has conducted more than 100 interviews, across 19 states, for his book about the Volkman case.

The DEA’s actions in Eil’s case follow a disturbing pattern of FOIA-related behavior from the agency in recent years. In 2012, reason.com reported that DEA FOIA rejections had increased 114 percent since 2008, and earlier this year, the agency told a FOIA requester it would cost $1.4 million to process his request.

The lawsuit was filed in the middle of Sunshine Week, a week designated to educate the public about the importance of open government.

Open gov’t groups blast Kilmartin on public records law


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Peter KilmartinCalling it “a new low” in the state’s enforcement of the Access to Public Records Act (APRA), five open government groups blasted an opinion issued by the Attorney General’s office which held that public bodies can charge members of the public for the time it takes to compose a letter denying an open records request.

That interpretation of the law was embodied in an AG advisory opinion, Clark v. Department of Public Safety, issued yesterday. It arose in the context of a Rhode Islander who had sought BCI and personnel records for an individual in the State Fire Marshal’s office. When the requester was denied access to the records on the grounds that they were confidential by law, he was charged a $15 fee. He then filed an appeal with the AG, leading to yesterday’s opinion. (The complaint raised a number of other APRA objections, which were also rejected in the opinion.)

APRA allows public bodies to charge for the “search and retrieval” of public records. The opinion appears to argue that because the time spent redacting records has been held to constitute “search and retrieval” time, then the time spent composing a letter to deny access can be charged as well. The portion of the opinion addressing this issue is on Pages 6 and 7.

Below are quotes denouncing the decision from representatives of Common Cause RI, ACCESS/RI, the ACLU of Rhode Island, the League of Women Voters of Rhode Island, and the New England First Amendment Coalition.

Rosanna Cavanagh, executive director of the New England First Amendment Coalition:

“The legislative intent of the statute is thwarted by the Attorney General’s new interpretation which in effect replaces the clear meaning of ‘search and retrieval’ with the opposite meaning of ‘search and denial.’ If this interpretation takes hold it would make Rhode Island the least access friendly state in New England in this regard.”

John Marion, executive director, Common Cause Rhode Island:

“By upholding the DPS’s decision to charge a citizen the costs associated with composing a letter denying their request, the Attorney General’s office has provided a blueprint for government officials to discourage public records requests.”

League of Women Voters of Rhode Island President Jane Koster:

“Too many public bodies already treat the open records statute like a series of recommended guidelines instead of a law that must be followed.  This opinion only exacerbates the many problems the public already has gaining access to information.”

Linda Levin, chair of the open government group ACCESS/RI:

“We call on the Attorney General to reverse this position in future decisions. If the office does not, ACCESS/RI stands ready to seek legislation that would establish into law that the public cannot be charged in any way when records are denied.”

Here’s my statement, as the executive director of the ACLU of Rhode Island:

“Allowing agencies to charge people for the privilege of having their request for records denied makes no sense, has no basis in the statute, and represents a new low in interpreting the open records law. It adds insult to injury, and is like sending a ‘Dear John’ letter postage due.”

Progress Report: Legislative Ninth Inning, Buddy Cianci, Obama, Pot Policy Homelessness and Buying Happiness


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

The legislative session is slated to end on Tuesday and if it does without the General Assembly approving a supplemental tax bill for Woonsocket residents the struggling city will probably have to file for bankruptcy … don’t worry, though, this isn’t a surprise to local legislators Jon Brien and Lisa Baldelli-Hunt, who won’t support the measure. Indeed, it’s the reason. Brien, an ALEC board member, is employing the old Grover Norquist approach to governance: shrink it until you can drown it in a bathtub. Baldelli-Hunt, on the other hand, covets the mayor’s office and thinks she can raise her stock by lowering the current mayor’s. In both cases, it is morally reprehensible to play such political games with the financial security of the city.

Also as the session winds down, Ted Nesi calls out Teresa Paiva Weed for standing in the way of a new public records law and a local version of a disclose law. Public records laws are uber-important to us journalists and by extension to the public.Compared to other states I’ve worked in – Oregon and Vermont, to name two – Rhode Island’s public records rules are repressive and seemingly designed to oppose open government rather than foster it.

The public records legislation is by no stretch the only bill that gets quietly killed by leadership … While “Paiva Weed’s chamber” gets a lot of grief for blocking marriage equality, Speaker Gordon Fox and House Finance Committee Chair Helio Melo both go virtually unnoticed for blocking income tax reform, even though there is more than enough evidence to show that tax cuts not only don’t benefited the local economy, they hurt it.

Speaking of public policy that is bad for the public, here’s to the Projo editorial board for calling out Buddy Cianci as being a big reason for Providence being in such financial straits as it was his administration that allowed for 6 percent annual pension increases. It’s been odd, to say the least, to hear Cianci call on Carcieri to speak up on 38 Studios while he’s never really addressed his own role in Providence’s pension mess.

The national media, or at least the National Journal, has picked up on a troubling scenario for Democrats this November that percolated up during Netroots here in Providence: progressives may not rally around Obama in 2012 the way they did in 2008. Stay tuned…

Another narrative to be amplified as a result of Netroots: Rhode Island isn’t nearly as liberal as local conservatives would have us believe.

One may argue that an exception to this rule might be the legislature’s recent relaxing of rules regulating marijuana … but as David Klepper of the Associated Press reports this really isn’t all that out of step with the rest of the country.

The US Commission on Civil Rights is opening an investigation into the racial bias of Stand Your Ground Laws.

Even in bastions of liberalism – like my old stomping grounds of Ashland, Oregon – cities across the country are cracking down on sleeping outside … the whole effort amounts to criminalizing homelessness.

Cars kill. And former ethicist Randy Cohen isn’t talking about accidents.

Who says money can’t buy happiness … in fact a new study shows the affluent are trying to purchase it more than ever

Legislature Considers Better Public Records Act


Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387

Deprecated: Function get_magic_quotes_gpc() is deprecated in /hermes/bosnacweb08/bosnacweb08bf/b1577/ipg.rifuturecom/RIFutureNew/wp-includes/formatting.php on line 4387
Mike Field, of the Attorney General's office, testifies at a hearing on a proposal to update Rhode Island's Access to Public Records Act.

Rhode Island’s public records law may get some much-needed revisions if a bill heard by the House Judiciary Committee last night becomes law.

The proposal, introduced by Rep. Michael Marcello, D-Scituate, would be the first amendment to the Access to Public Records Act in 15 years. It would: decrease the amount of time a public agency has to make public records available from ten to 7 days; require municipalities and government agencies to designate and train a public records officer; require police departments to make initial arrest reports available within 24 hours; and would make correspondences between elected officials regarding policy public documents.

Officials with the Attorney General’s office, which submitted a separate bill that doesn’t reach as far, the Department of Administration and local and state police took issue with the legislation, advocates for civil liberties and open government applauded the effort.

“This may impose some additional burdens on government employees but it should be accepted as an important part of their work,” said Steve Brown, the executive director of the RI ACLU.

Brown said people and organizations that seek public records in Rhode Island often run into problems obtaining them. He said the changes would improve citizen’s access to public records.

While police are against compelling arrest reports to be made available within 24 hours, saying this could be onerous for officers, John Marion, the executive director of  Common Cause RI, said making arrest reports available as quickly as possible is an important function of a free society.

“Arresting someone is the strongest action the state can take against an individual,” he said. “When the state takes away someone’s liberty – that’s what an arrest represents – the state should provide information about that in as timely as manner as possible.”

There is also a Senate bill, sponsored by James Sheehan, D- North Kingstown, that would update the Access to Public Records Act that open records advocates say doesn’t go as far as this one in ensuring that citizens have easy access to public records.