The Morning After

Judiciary HearingIt seems fitting that the Providence Journal editorialized in support of making Plan B, the emergency contraceptive drug, over the counter the very morning after Rhode Island’s annual abortion restriction hearing in the State House.  Over sixty supporters came out in waves of pink to support the work of the RI Coalition for Reproductive Justice and Planned Parenthood as the House Judiciary Committee heard five abortion restriction bills.

Interestingly of the five bills heard, only three of the legislative sponsors came out to support their own legislation.  Rep. Fellela who sponsored the sex selection ban and Rep. Palumbo who sponsored the wait period “women’s right to know act” were noticeably absent. Over all, little time was spent explaining how any of the bills heard would reduce unintended pregnancy or abortion rates in Rhode Island, both of which are some of the highest in the New England region.

As the legislature enters its final five weeks of what has already been an active session with passage of marriage equality, we hope the General Assembly will remember that Rhode Island already has a range of restrictive regulations and laws on the books, many of which are unconstitutional and unenforceable.  Rhode Island already requires “informed consent” prior to abortion, prohibits public funding for abortion services and is subject to all the federal laws including the late term abortion ban upheld by the US Supreme Court in 2009. There is no need to replicate these policies in state law.

However, Rhode Island persists as an outlier in New England for its high unintended pregnancy and teen pregnancy rates.  Although those rates have been on a decline over the last ten years thanks to advances in long acting reversible contraception methods and greater public awareness of family planning services, none of the five bills proposed here today address unintended pregnancy and will do NOTHING to reduce the abortion rate in Rhode Island.

486698_960446246222_1333361226_n

The  General Assembly does however have the opportunity this session to expand the Medicaid family planning benefit to include more low income women, and Rhode Island will receive $9 from the federal government for every $1 we spend on this program through the state’s Global Medicaid Waiver. We can and should do better in Rhode Island.  It’s time to move beyond the divisive political attacks on reproductive health and work together toward real solutions to real problems in public health.  Rhode Island is not North Dakota.  Rhode Island is not Texas.  Rhode Island is not Arkansas.  Rhode Island can do better.

In case you missed the hearing you may watch it online (the hearing on the abortion bills begins at minute 85).

Organizations & Individuals who testified in Opposition to Abortion Restrictions in RI

Paula Hodges – Planned Parenthood Southern New England

Steve Brown – RI American Civil Liberties Union

Carolyn Mark, RI NOW

Rev. David Ames, Planned Parenthood Clergy Advisory Board

Rick Harris – RI National Association of Social Workers

Kristina Fox, Ocean State Action

Mary Chace, RI League of Women Voters

Steve Alquist, Humanists of RI

Dr. Emily White

RI Medical Society

Sarah Kramer – Brown Medical Student

Marie Deluca – Brown Medical Student

Micala Venta, Brown Medical Student

Caitlin Naureckas – Brown Medical Student

Rachel Orsinger, RI Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Barbara Colt – Rhode Islanders for Abortion Rights

Rev. Elizabeth Barnum

Margret (Penny) Guyer

Rachel Bloom

Lauren Niedel

Jessan Dunn Otis

Gus Uht

VN:R_U [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
The Morning After, 10.0 out of 10 based on 1 rating

3 responses to “The Morning After”

  1. Barry

    I thank Paula and all those who spoke against these hideous bills aimed at destroying reproductive freedom.  The “anti-abortion” lobby is so misnamed as they are also (mostly) opposed to promoting contraceptive services that would actually reduce abortions.   Another hypocritcal part of the antiabortion movement is though though they (mostly) rail against “big government” but not in this case.  Though I know there are some well meaning people caught up in the “pro-life” moovement, at heart I believe it is a movement concerned not with life but with forcing a cruel version of their religion on everybody (in that the power of government would be used to force women to bear children against their will) in response to fear of female sexuality.

    VN:R_U [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. Johnnie

    This debate around abortion is about reinforcing male supremacy and patriarchal domination and control of women and their bodies. Women exist to serve men, either to bear his children or for his pleasure. These cretins can couch it in any terms they wish but it is always about male privilege.
    A centuries old Chinese proverb says it all: “A women married is like a pony bought, I’ll whip her and ride her as I please.”
    Break the Chains! Unleash the fury of women as a mighty force for revolution.

    VN:R_U [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. Lauren Niedel

    I would like to thank several members from RI Progressive Democrats of America for testifying and showing our opposition to the bills.  Gus Uht, Steve Ahlquist, Nancy St. Germaine (who was not given the opportunity to speak and myself all attended the hearings.  Lisa Beade who unfortunately was home sick was unable to attend but did submit personal testimony.

    VN:R_U [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.